tv Planning Commission 92916 SFGTV September 30, 2016 8:00pm-10:01pm PDT
8:00 pm
8:01 pm
state your name for the record. those folks that are standing need to find a seat can't stand in front of of the doorway if you can't find a seat i'll call to accommodate for an overflow room i'd like to call roll at this time. commissioner president fong commissioner vice president richards commissioner hillis commissioner koppel commissioner melgar and commissioner moore. >> we do expect commissioner johnson to arrive shortly commissioners, the first item on your agenda items proposed for continuance item 1 24th street avenue conditional use authorization is proposed until october 6, 2016, item 2 at polk street conditional use
8:02 pm
authorization is proposed for continuance october 6, 2016, and items 3 ab 20th street is proposed for continuance until december 8th and further commissioners under our consent calendar we received a request from the project sponsor to continue item 4 for case van ness avenue conditional use authorization if you want to accommodate that request we'll fit it on october 21st schedule. >> thank you any public comment? items proposed for continuance okay comment is closed. commissioner vice president richards. >> move to approve to the dates specified. >> commissioner moore. >> i forgot any words. >> second.
8:03 pm
>> second. >> very good commissioners to continue all items as proposed commissioner hillis commissioner koppel compare commissioner moore commissioner vice president richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places. >> as acting da i'll continue item 3 b to the dates specified. >> expirations that places us on your may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. item 5 case eddy street conditional use authorization,
8:04 pm
item 6 at san jose condominium conversion substitution and cashing anymore conditional use authorization planned unit development there are no speaker cards. >> any public comment on the items on the consent calendar okay not seeing any, public comment is closed. >> commissioner moore. >> move to approve items 5, 6 and 7 as noted. >> thank you. >> commissioners on that motion to approve matters under our consent calendar commissioner hillis commissioner koppel commissioner melgar commissioner moore commissioner vice president richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places us under commission matters for item 8 consideration of adoption of
8:05 pm
draft minutes for september 16th commissioner moore submitted some non-substantive sort of minor tweaks to her comment they will be incorporated if you so approve. >> thank you any public comment on the draft minutes public comment is closed. commissioner vice president richards. >> move to approve second. >> thank you, commissioners on that motion to adopt the minutes for september 8th commissioner hillis commissioner koppel commissioner melgar commissioner moore commissioner vice president richards commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on tome 9 commissioners questions or comments. >> okay. it appears no comments thank you. >> very good commissioners
8:06 pm
that might be a first that places us under drourment. >> good afternoon, commissioners i don't have anything new to report either i'll pass. >> item 11 event of the historic preservation commission no historic preservation commission hearing good afternoon aaron starr, manager, legislative affairs. for the planning department at that land use committee the committee heard an ordinance to amend the zoning and height and bulk indict for fulsome changing from the designation with the height and bulk of 50 to your own mixed use this was harder on july 28th with a 5 to zero vote the commission recommended that the board adopt the proposed ordinance as a transportation committee hearing only a few brief commenters in support of ordinance and moved to the full
8:07 pm
board with a positive recommendation at the full board this week the amendments to the housing balance sponsored by supervisor kim passed its first reading and the midtown was considered by the full board the board hearing supervisor yee moved to remove the amendment adam by supervisor wiener and land use committee that subjected the midtown to the accessary dwelling program supervisor campos seconded the amendment the board voted to pass the amendment with supervisor wiener the only dissenting vote no introductions this week that concludes my report. thanks. >> okay. thank you. >> commissioners on behalf of the zoning administrator the board of appeals met last night with only item of interest the appeal of unoccupied buildings permit for 14 pier 80 thirty, with the dr that hearing commission took the dr and added
8:08 pm
a restriction for a single-family dwelling to the dr for the potential to use the ground floor it was an appeal by the neighbor if maintained the layout of the appeal the board approved the permit at the planning commission commissioners under general public comment not to exceed 15 minutes minutes at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. with respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission up to three minutes. i have no speaker cards. >> >> any general public comment? wow. >> okay. thank you. >> very good commissioners that places us under our regular calendar for item 12 the upper market street planning code and zoning map amendment.
8:09 pm
>> you guys are moving really fast good afternoon, commissioners aaron starr, manager, legislative affairs. the the item before you is a proposed ordinance probation officer amends the zoning map for the deletion of the commercial district and reclarify the castro street and misrepresenting from upper market in c district to the upper market commercial transit district this ordinance is a clean piece of legislation in 2013 that commission voted to extend the nct from nov to castro the two tell us were left out of the ordinance we were within 5 hundred feet of supervisors residence those policies prohibit the supervisors from sponsoring ordinance that impact the property the vote the planning commission recommended that those two parcels are rezoned to the nct, however, there were not included isn't final ordinance because a separate notice is
8:10 pm
required to rezone them the two main difference are fir nct don't have density limits that are determined by lot area a dwelling unit density units of one per 4 hundred square feet the density in the nct by how large the building the be height and bulk and other exposures and open space speaks waldo called formed based density and two the nct don't have minimum parking requirement the upper market nnth district one parking space for every dwelling unit and the nct didn't allow a half a space and .75 so for every dwelling unit with conditional use authorization did tell the court be height and bulk limitations rear yard requirement and maximum non-residential and hours of operation and floor
8:11 pm
ratios will not be alternated by the ordinance and eligible for the height for ground floor commercial as a standard in the nct sdrints the allowable commercial use will remain the same after publication of the staff report with the help felt neighborhood association found a fix of those i have those jonas if you wouldn't mind psa them out basically, it will subject the proposed zoned nct to the market octavia planned area development impact fees and the affordable housing fees so it in nodding the board passed an ordinance sponsored that subjected those parcels to the market street impact fees, however, with the 2003 rezoning that was not updated to reflect the rezoning of those property the two property are zoned today are subject to the market
8:12 pm
octavia impact fees but not the other properties on the block the texts will correct this in the upper market nct to the market octavia impact fees even if their outside of the market octavia planned area so staff new recommendation for approval with modifications and i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you. >> commissioner moore. >> public first have a comment. >> any public comment on this item? not seeing any, commissioner moore. >> this was discussed along a long time ago i'm very secretary glad you amended 2 you read into the record i'm in full support at a time the form basis was very, very deliberately made and move to approve with modifications. >> second. >> thank you, commissioners
8:13 pm
there is a motion that has been seconded to do you want a recommendation for approval with the amendment read into the record by staff on that motion commissioner hillis commissioner koppel commissioner melgar commissioner moore commissioner vice president richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places us on item 13 for case amusement in the mixed use planning code amendments. >> you're moving faster supervisor kim's office wanted to be here for this item and not here yet. >> so i'll go over my presentation good afternoon the item before you is a planning code amendment that allows the amusement in the south of market in the mixed use district this ordinance is proposed a bar
8:14 pm
arcadia named coin game room is seeking to allocating on forest street for the light industrial the regulations will not allow the arcadia to open as a use it prohibited in the zoning and let april continue thank you. >> good afternoon. i'm april from supervisor kim's office and here to speak about this piece of legislation and ask for your support with some modifications we were approached by business that was interested in being locked in our district is arcade games in 1992 the police code prohibited this in san francisco
8:15 pm
and our current zoning and allow the arcade not permitted in some districts he previously amendments to the planning code that allows the arcade i believe in the upper market and the hate street commercial district and this legislation before you will allow arcade games in particular district and in this case the legislation was introduced in the south of market and had in the broader eastern neighborhoods but i have received calls from some community members in the south of market that were concerned about the broad change and a desire to have more community process as it relate to oar can do games allowed in the south of market and i imagine the eastern neighborhoods as a hole i
8:16 pm
presented and small business commission therapy in support of this legislation is it so really our attempt to support small businesses or a small business and also address something i think that has been a hold over from times past but i definitely want to expect that each neighborhood has a community process and this definition should be changed if desired ti at a citywide level perhaps the goals 7 and 8 reorganization a full discussion about this but as a relatives to this particular business and that particular location what i suggest as an amendment to limit this permitted use in service light industrial that will allow the business that is interested in moving forward it's appropriate, it's currently an entertainment a night life use
8:17 pm
and a precedent with the western soma present south of harrison and that falls south of harrison arcade use associated with a bar so that's what i would suggest as a way to move forward that supports the businesses that is interested in the change and also replacements the community process and desire to have more input open that which was. >> thank you. we may have questions mr. starr do you want to conclude. >> yeah. i'll conclude the rest of my presentation was an staffs recommendation given the narrowing scope of the ordinance i'll say this department recommend approval as amended thank you. >> thank you. >> opening it up for public comme
8:18 pm
comment. >> good afternoon henry on the south of market business association this matter come up before this commission and approved amazing the younger generation in the games and the games are popular as the aide to jane kim mentioned the change of the legislation and the zoning in the area to permit this but again considering we had not heard of anyone is against it i got a call from the aid a while back she would up to date make it for the n l ii love had it we support that and move forward it is a venue that is in operation for agree a long time about restaurants and about restaurant
8:19 pm
and the arcade games what happened you can only have 10 or less machines that will change to have as many as you want they're small times i'd like if you support this legislation. >> okay. thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners my name is jeffrey the past chair the south beach citizens advisory may be one of i i doubt any of you were on the committee when sue - i worked for 10 years on the eastern neighborhood of my countless hours and thousand of meetings we carve outed this with a broad brush you'll allow in the south of market with absolutely no community input whatsoever south
8:20 pm
park we'll fight in legislation tooth and nail it you want to know what that means ask larry bear the vice president of the giant how much it cost him to build his ball park they tried to do the same thing without community input you guys owe to us a resident and stakeholder and business owners to open this up to community involvement brother you pass it a lot along we can work you, you. >> cac was one of the most pro-active cacs in the city lou gehrig's disease for businesses appropriating located this is not the kind of legislation that had been blind-sided an affront to every resident in san francisco that has within through planning in the last 20 years i suggest what you do i take this off our calendar today
8:21 pm
and call for community hearing we have the south beach rincon and director rahaim you know that i'm completely blown away that is ram rotted down our throat i ask for a continuance thank you. >> i'm one the own and operate to start of i'm a little bit shocked to hear the gentleman before me with all due respect from the entertainment commission we've had things in our doors part of neighborhood i'd like to hear from him that we're working with the neighborhood as well much like an conversation moving forward not necessarily on the back
8:22 pm
docket with that said, i want to share some thoughts on the proposal of arcade you know we are more is a see a restaurant bar we are using the arcade as an accessory to our use and i want to go over the evolution is it so not a common word but a trendy thing across the city across the country so arcades we remember the renewed interest has to do with with in a staflg - that kind of things that make it market for generations your
8:23 pm
generational gap and we looked at the south of market is the reason to be looked at how it is becoming the kind of entertainment the airport and there's a bowling alley and ping-pong bar in the neighborhood we offer is entertainment that is a lot more affordable you're going to certain places and spending $0.60 of combined entertainment and with that said, there's almost a necessity in the neighborhood because of the generation wide that the south of market has and home to some of the biggest companies in america electronic arts and others i believe that's it sony
8:24 pm
we nevertheless, feel we fit the neighborhood and any concerns we are open to hearing that we're really not ram rhodes the issue i disagree and thank you for your time. >> thank you >> next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, commissioners i worked in arcades for 3 years within that time i witnessed arcades bring a positive vibe in a sense of belonging community to an establishment a place where neighborhood businesses come after work and grab something to eat and enjoy themselves people discuss business and meet new friend a place anyone can be themselves and have a great time it is positive for everything i've seen in the neighborhoods i've worked in i feel on the
8:25 pm
game room in the corridor will brighten the plain clothes with a dynamic of entertainment a necessity as a subway with the trolley to mission bay area and thank you for your time. >> next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, commissioners thanks for taking the time i'm joseph and i'm the head of arcade operations for coin up gave himer a little bit about me i grew up in san francisco born and raised third-generation was all around the development of the ball park i worked for a major plumbing company in san francisco at the time and saw growing up who it was about what everything was going on in the downtown in the
8:26 pm
soma, etc. one thing i take from myself of myself is the diversity going to grammar school and going to high school that was one thing that san francisco always spoke to me was the different cultures different you know ideas and the arcade scene for me is really the basis of bringing multiple generations together in our sacramento location one thing i see day to day i will see customers that are say middle-aged and placing a game and next to them 20 somethings they're a playing pinball for
8:27 pm
t the same time i see the conversations between the generations of people that's the diversity i see us bringing to gave himer in the soma district that is really a positive influence what we bring to the area so thank you for your time. >> hi commissioners my name is ken one of the 4 owners that own the building that coin up 19is going on into i other people a small business owner and have a stake in four rauntsd in san francisco and one in oakland i'll say this from a landlords perspective we interviewed a lot of tenants and we wereing i
8:28 pm
intrigued they presented an interesting business plan we visited a bunch a food operations that wanted to do deliveries in the city backed by capita lifts but we poke to the we were impressed with the arcade restaurant bar that plays out in the context of our neighborhood but talking to people that been to the location in san diego and out in sacramento we were impressed how well, they computed their business and the types of investors to have their businesses in san francisco this in conjunction with any general knowledge how business is conducted in the city. >> what appeals to certain neighborhood was very much in support of approving how o how these guys open up their business and looking at their
8:29 pm
construction as they've been you know rolling out things in the past couple of months impressed with the quality of detail and the profit to the space i'm very much in support of these guys and hope you guys are too. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good afternoon my name is a peter i'm the assistant general manager of coin up sacramento through my time being there i've seen first hand how our concept is a designation downtown on cat street not gentrified we're bringing people to us who are more than likely not becoming downtown we're getting state capital workers, local business
8:30 pm
employees with the arena coming in downtown we're at the forefront of bringing all that new people can new money downtown one of my favorite things about coin up likely said misrepresent generational people are 75 and people 21 everything about coin up is amazing one of my favorite places when i'm at work not at work we worked in contact with the downtown partnering and the sacramento police department we've tried to make downtown a safer place a know our limit program where the police come in and talk to people having a couple of drinks to see where they're at yeah. i hope you guys approve coin opt san
8:31 pm
francisco thank you very much. >> hi commissioners i'm a local binder in san francisco for 10 years from the sacramento area how i got involved i was back home and - went down to the coin opted opt and had a blast and it is amazing how to say changing everything and bringing people downtown to the area kind of the same thing whether the bartender i worked additionally we went to the giant games and hang out after we were walking home not the nicest of areas and it will be a great asset to the city and bring in a lot of revenue and people i've seen businessmen in
8:32 pm
sacramento playing street games with a construction worker and seeing how everybody gets along the vibe inside of bar people are not sitting at a bar but walking around and meeting people and it is just a different vibe it is awesome i hope you approve this. >> good afternoon. my name is she low parrot of opening staff in coin opt sxooment i noticed how much so forthtion of the community we need to create community and part of my personal experience of being a queer and growing up a lack of social spaces to have people engage in my community is
8:33 pm
placard by substance abuse but adults can come together and gave me sober there is no pressure to drink no pressure to do things that young 20 something years old do it is a way to interact with each other this spot will be incredibly an important space especially in the area and provide a physical space for people to build community it is a place where people flourish and take care of themselves and provide an alternative space we don't necessarily have i'm excited to have the community to have a stronger community and this space will a great place for
8:34 pm
that thank you. >> thank you. >> my name is grazie came here to speak i live on the east bay this is a nice place for people to come over and experience something in the city and have somewhere to go to doesn't put pressure but introduces you to a new community i never came in 9 fillmore but now i've been introduced to marlow and other places in the community and people in the community and i think that will be a really good benefit to have to have a place in that area thank you. >> hi there
8:35 pm
my name is staffing on a resident of san francisco i used to live in san diego and know the owners of coin opt coin up of opt arcade will be a place where people in braurgsdz come together in sloorld and there's a class in san francisco and that place can mend that divide one of the purposes in arcade to bring people together for joy and that creates a higher vibration and people operating on a higher vibration this will create a happier san francisco thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners my name is pauline i've been in the industry for quite a while one of the biggest things we bartenders provide you with a
8:36 pm
wonderful experience and have found in that experience in coin opt we get to open it we'll bring a lot of communities together and destress and get you, your farther drink and play whatever game you like to do that's wonderful i hope you guys approve it thank you for your time. >> okay is there any additional public comment? >> okay not seeing any, public comment is closed. and opening that to commissioners, if i may start april thank you for coming and sort of breaking and entering break it is down to specific locates he personally ran an arcade at fisherman's wharf and had control of '75 games knew how to fix them and unjam coin
8:37 pm
slots and pack man and frond but the point is i agree with some of the speakers that that brings people together and you can be playing or against maybe an enemy or acre enemy but for that moment brought enjoyment to folks a good thing i'll be supportive of the change to approve this specifically for this location to the opposition i agree this shunt shouldn't be approved to the district this is not what we're intending but this participate operation i think is fine commissioner moore. >> i he'll appreciate you're talking about your past i was asking you to - i grew up. >> i'll community-based there hopefully. >> i grew up watching other
8:38 pm
people being very funny about using those machines it is a great story in the technical 21st century things are coming back and offering something else i'm interested in reading the description about the recurrent and i think site specific consideration that is the project mentions by the supervisor i will consider it i will agree with you that's where i think the supporters are not aware what is in front of the commission is the support for your site specific approval wrapped up in a much, much broader form of legislative amendments that effect people that have not been asked it is in that particular area particularly this commission and the neighbors that will be engaged are looking at rewriting
8:39 pm
of article 7 and 8 the redefinition of particular uses and how we're starting to use and streamline our code to agree with the eloquent summary of commissioner president fong i'll support this with a much narrower and site purpose for 508, fourth street but that's as far as i support it so the supervisors recommendations will guide any recommendation for the proposal. >> commissioner vice president richards. >> i guess a question for mr. starr can we go ahead and narrow this to this parcel. >> uh-huh. >> no, no not just the parcel but the item. >> how many parcels will the district cover. >> that's the broader brush i'm hearing. >> i don't know commissioner i
8:40 pm
don't think that is a lapsing district anymore. >> okay i guess the gentleman from south park rincon can you come up. >> so if we narrowed it to the s l i how about that. >> i'm troubled by the s l i and the central soma bryant street is s l i zoned i believe that bryant street are bodies s l i zoned it is troubling if you use that as your basis i'll not be opposed to the location did location 19is appropriate for the proposed arcade but if you use that broad-brush and say this is an approved use without
8:41 pm
cu that makes it troubling if you understood - but make it a s l i and in an inappropriate location we can participate best to have that interaction with the neighborhoods you get the input from the people and the businesses people that are directly impacted known is against entertainment we have a 42 thousand entertainment the ball park in the nation but that of those because we finally got the giant to concede and able to work with them in that manner so - >> okay. a question for the city attorney if we tried to narrow it beyond the s l i zoning to just a parcel how
8:42 pm
about. >> deputy city attorney mirena burns. the question so i understand that rather than have this be a zoning map amendment for the - and the s l i. >> you would make to this particular parcel. >> yeah. and in the public process to engage with the public and expand beyond the parcel to the s l i and other zoning districts. >> i'm sorry. >> to have the department to have a public process to expand beyond this parcel to the s l i when engaged in the be neighborhood. >> if i can interject with the conditional use authorization to allow more thorough review of those projects 0 sethey come up from the future to do just a project specific to allow this
8:43 pm
use you'd need an sud this is a map amendment you couldn't do that. >> i'll support rezoning with the cu with the future projects. >> commissioner moore. >> i'd like to see a border definition i'd like here to look at the second look the s l i and the western edition task force that spent decades on carefully working without and the land use that few of us understand the great deferred i don't want us to be too broad but i believe i'd like the supervisor to listen to what we're saying and follow-up individual decisions but leave it basically with a
8:44 pm
focus on the property in question and it will be someone expertise to do it in a manner that is expedite and supportive of a small business and in principle we're supportive that's the use on that side being an arcade. >> okay commissioner hillis. >> so i want to clarify we're recommending you know making recommendations to the board who ultimately have to make this change to the code i'm a little bit - certainly those - i mean those ordinances were put in place place in arcade we don't have whatever issues there were spur putting the limited in and i'm
8:45 pm
hesitant to say you have to come back for an arcade with a cu when no really anything that troubles me about an arcade i suggest we recommend approval as april pointed out with the modifications and s l i but encourage the board to limit this further or look at the cu and go out and talk with the impacted neighbors so we may not be thinking of all them that's all i move to recommend approval as proposed by supervisor kim's office but encourage them to consider a further limits to geogratefully or by the zoning code or in the future. >> second. >> commissioner johnson.
8:46 pm
>> i seconded the motion but highlight commissioner hillis we had that hearing being the arcades in another district the hate and spent a lot of time about the police code and how to be for amazement arcade uses like this i think that one was slightly different on the second story an additional element but the same i read this case i don't see the policy i understand there was a lot of - work on the eastern neighborhoods but in terms of the policy reasons to say additional scrutiny on that type of project i'm not seeing it i'll second the motion to encourage the board to see if we have blind spots but not in favor by this - so with that said the only other thing in the question maybe the city attorney
8:47 pm
if this legislation were passed with a cu may be added as the type of approval later on does that mean that has to come for that approval. >> deputy city attorney mirena burns. yeah, you don't have this specific project only the planning code from the legislation requires a conditional use authorization in order to do this type of use you'll see that application in front of you with future arcade. >> right now the legislation is permitted so they'll go through to get a building permit again, i second the motion but strongly encourage from the supervisors want a cu to look at that and make sure the scrutiny is here i don't see it maybe there are blind spots.
8:48 pm
>> commissioner vice president richards. >> i really want to support this legislation, however, i agree with commissioner moore i'd like to support it if this business for all the reasons that everybody said, however, i don't know how many parcels are covered from the s l ii heard this side of bryant tan deposit and that side of bryant tan daughter-in-law i'll vote no. >> i want to ask the supervisors representative to perhaps ask you please answer a question for me i've very much perceptive the author back and forth the commission and very much interested to see the last points by commissioner hillis and commissioner johnson being a guide double we're addressing the concerns for the supervisors that the people are looking at land use. >> i appreciate you all trying
8:49 pm
to balance the neighborhood process and also support for business and we're also trying to balance this too so i think what i would ask is to narrow the geographic area for permitting arcade to s l i and zoning in particular is going through its own process because s l i is part of the central soma plan only and not beyond that there will be an additional process for s l i zoning i've taken sxhifksz recommendation around the cu but will appreciate the ability for me to talk with the neighbors and the business to talk about what the best way to move forward on whatever to apply a cu in this case but would ask that we
8:50 pm
have time to kind of work that through so basically i'll asking for you to support this legislation to permit arcade in s ii and have that conversations with the neighbors and businesses. >> okay. >> commissioner vice president richards. >> one point i'd like to make in the western selma a bar called the organizational. >> i can't hear you. >> a western barn called the echo electronic device more s l i than you think i'll hearing a no. >> oh, sally s a l i. >> supervisor continues to the
8:51 pm
neighborhood outreach i can support this great. >> okay jonas. >> commissioner moore sorry. >> wouldn't the motion be there is an intent because what is in front of us. >> it is just a recommendation. >> just a recommendation thank you for commissioner hillis. >> okay. thank you. >> very good commissioners there is a motion that has been seconded to adopt a recommendations for approval of this legislation as it has been amended by the supervisors office restricting the s l i zoning. >> commissioner hillis. >> commissioner johnson commissioner koppel commissioner melgar commissioner moore commissioner vice president richards commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero commissioners that places us on item 14 cap street conditional
8:52 pm
use authorization. >> okay one moment. >> okay. >> thank you. >> good afternoon planning commission chris planning department staff and welcome the two commissioners the item before you a continual use authorization for the proposed demolition of an existing single-family dwelling with detached building to the rear and the construction of a new 4 story 78 hundred square feet residential with 4 dwelling units pursuant to the planning code section an application for a permit that has a loss of one or more units for a cu application and shall be subject to that authorization on the west side of cap street between 24th street on a 25 wide lot the parcel is central locate
8:53 pm
within the block and currently contains two vacant eagle one single-family home and the rear building a two-story accessory building it is locate within the mission neighborhood and the block is composed of single and misrepresent family residential building with three or 4 story street wall and two churches on the block one in immediately adjacent to 9 site and on cap street the the subject property is also well-served by transit the bart station a block away in the neighborhood served by muni bus lines the proposed 40 foot tall structure will provide 4 dwelling units with 3 seriousy off-street parking and had class 1 bike parking spaces the proposed mixed use is two, two
8:54 pm
bedroom and 3, three bedrooms with private decks and a shared roof deck all over it is contemporary in design and includes horizontal wood siding and a natural limestone base with regards to the public comment no public comment to date and i'll go through 9 important characteristics first, the project is consistent with the zoning district no density limit rather the density is regulated by the property development standards and the residential design guidelines this district is intended to accommodate a greater density whereas the current lot has a single single-family dwelling four unit with 14 hundred square feet and two, three bedroom and
8:55 pm
2, three bedrooms compatible with the neighborhood and contribute to the mid block open space and 40 no tenants are are displaced as a result before i clouk the presentation we want to read into the record a minor slight revisions on page 5 condition item section 7 i'll hand out now. >> this is the findings that addresses where the project removed the units the handful is passed out now the findings currently reads no rent-controlled units will be removed and not subject to the arbitration the finding shall read the single-family dwellings are vacant and the platt cannot define it is to the arbitration
8:56 pm
ordinance the adapt department can confirm no tenants are living in the dwelling that concludes my presentation. i'm available to answer any questions. >> thank you project sponsor please. >> hi, i'm speaking on behalf of the project sponsor who is stuck in traffic i come to speech in support my name is a john strickland i own the property next door and meeting met numerous times i asked him to shave back his building he did so but i'm not the sponsor only he's in the car i guess he called me. >> all right. any other speakers i'm sorry opening up for public comment i have one card felix flores.
8:57 pm
>> felix flores okay. >> good afternoon. my name is felix flolz going to speak in behalf of the church, i used to be is that 856 and 854 cap street that 854 is the backhouse of church i would like you to have a consideration of that property that belongs to our church and all the church in the neighborhood the president to demolish you know but want to start by the 854 property but that's the half of the
8:58 pm
church. >> that's all. >> okay. thank you. >> is there any additional public comment? >> open this item. >> not seeing any, public comment is closed. and commissioner vice president richards. >> i guess here we find ourselves not really completely understanding where our dwelling unit or dwelling units we see a shed in the back up the street from me a project that was submitted inside that a dwelling unit and the project went to the braid that was appealed overturning our decision in a single-family home there was a - i find it hard to believe that nobody has done a visible inspection of the property without the rent board telling me whether it is a - i
8:59 pm
think this commission will do us a favor to ask the rent board to ask whether or not the dwelling units are rent-controlled we shouldn't be playing the victim card we need more information. >> commissioner johnson. >> thank you to sxhifksz comment and globally i agree with you but we have seen the rent board come to the planning commission and try to explain their process and it is so convolute i don't know how they do it is in a straightforward thing to determine whether or not something is rent-controlled it is easier whether which there are tenant to look at some sort of history with that said, lo although i'm frustrated not having the answer he weigh that against the projects to be
9:00 pm
considered here and the other policy objectives that may help us i think having 4 unit rather than one there may be some discussions go about it's relationship to the church next door and enough of a policy consideration to not holed up the project to have that answer especially i don't know if we continued or pushed the rent board to provide us more information we'll get anything clarifying. >> commissioner vice president richards. >> i i guess i'll ask staff and maybe the director what happened on the san bruno we were overturned 11 zero what information came out we didn't see i'd like to understand that are we facing the same thing here could we be. >> so commission based on my understanding there was confusion about the unauthorized dwelling unit so is relative to the approval that was provided
9:01 pm
the commission so there was kind of a back and forth on whether or not the unit which was separated by or the area was separated by a wall and a gap between what we consider a structure or 2 structure and whether or not that was occupying a separate structure as opposed to a continuous structure. >> seems like sheds are not what their labeled if you were up to me a person was living there it was like the shed got demolished so without a visible inspection i'll zero on this yeah, we'll get 4 unit and 14 hundred a square foot a starter home so i can't support this
9:02 pm
absolutely not. >> commissioner hillis. >> one of the how did will - i don't think we're saving an affordable home we have a look at this rent control gentrification which we talk about a lot so i think there are two ways to go seems by looking at the pictures and the google maps this is a single-family home we asking can ask the staff to look at this and determine there is not a home in the back i don't know from the project sponsor. >> didn't look like the project sponsor is here. >> and go get an opinion from the rent board this is a single-family home and not subject to rent control. >> they're able to seek that if we want to. >> i posed the same question to the project sponsor in the process and confirmed in writing
9:03 pm
this is entirely vacant with no tenant and reinforced by the plan and from the building department. >> i guess to commissioner vice president richards someone could put a unit in the back in the by permit i don't care if it makes it rent control but i think the property owner can go to the rent board and see 24 the not subject to rent control. >> director ram. >> sorry commissioners, i wanted to remind you relate to the findings the rent control is only one of the criteria but not something you have to meet specifically a consideration relative to the longer list of criteria that we examined under residential demolition so not a yes or no question basically it is one of the many factors have you to consider and maybe in the
9:04 pm
applications so - >> okay commissioner moore. >> the responsibility of having proper demolition o information weighs heavy on us every week people telling us we're acting on insufficient information not to get into the information about the demolition career we have the right to get someone to go to the site inside that is and look at it whether that has been i'd like as a living and correct your observation there are unusual places that are opted out from garages to others i think enough evidence we need clear support from the department to encourage us in a timely manner when it comes to us have the right to make the right decisions in support or in opposition that's not been done today and
9:05 pm
commissioner moore. >> i'm sorry. >> commissioner melgar. >> go ahead so i release that are several criteria we should be looking at i support maximizing the density of this particular parcel i think you know in the neighborhood that spell needs housing i support that but it is he heart of you know neighborhood that is near and dear to my heart and whether or not it is occupied that's important i e-mailed this piper didn't give me a lot of confidence having set up a disk for a few years the issue of whether a little was opted out is not straightforward it means
9:06 pm
we looked at utility bills and once we do it i feel confident i think all the other things that project brings are good things i'll support it but folks living there i don't want to make things worse. >> commissioner johnson. >> okay so i think i'm not going to make this motion i don't ago with that people need more time to go back all over the place get more information i'll say two things the first, we think to get more perspective 50 years from now those 3 unit will be hopefully, some form of rent control versus the one house and shed that may or may not be occupiable space that is right there right now that's right the perspective i try to have 50 years 3, two or three bedroom unit i think 4
9:07 pm
that will be rent control or older housing stock i think the other thing i building in general so for those sort of things we need to not try to boil the ocean in terms of having our objective standards what we're consider the proper amount of information to support those projects we've seen he can name two or three that are seared in any memory and outside the approximately may not be as a high priority a big deal we dug and dug and dug none seems to be able to be confident we had enough information particularly whether or not a unit is occupied and whether or not it should, rent stabilize fine if people want to go back with specific information to make people comfortable but not
9:08 pm
an objective based on of evidence xyz we know one thing is on one side of line or the other we had those fwooment we ask people to stand isn't doorway and wait for someone to come home to an those cases i don't know if it is where we need to be as a planning commission. >> commissioner moore. >> i recall the department very constructively working with us in questionable situations i'll say exclusively no disappointment of myself sitting and making informed decisions i can rattle off a couple of addresses but 4 or 5 or 6 was indeed brought forwarded not because of departments short coming but taking a look all we're asking for taking into account a look the
9:09 pm
gentrification of the site has 124i9s - it will be discussed in a supportive way i move to approve - to continue the projectile the missing information is substantiated and, of course, i'll ask that the issue about mechanical rooftop equipment further examined by the department no section into the package that shows you what that means. >> second. >> commissioner vice president richards. >> i'm not against gentrification by the way, it will not be rent-controlled it can't be retired after 1995 so 50 years will be different this is where the most displacement in the city in their 24th street and the quatro for no affordable
9:10 pm
housing this is for something working with new construction and displace people in the neighborhood not to look at the local businesses they want to shop at this story repeats over and over should this house stand i don't know it might be better off as four units but not enough information given the information i ask this commission to please send a letter to the rent board telling them of our struggle and help us understand better, more information we have a more comfortable level of information. >> commissioners to respond to a couple of points part of issue we haveness a respondent basically the rent board can't defyly state if there's a
9:11 pm
rent-controlled or make a determination or not so 411 unless the side of a tenant to confirm what the rent board is seeking in terms of that so - >> lastly at the board of supervisors the rent board said on tape i assume every unit is rent-controlled unless proven no otherwise proven we ask that be our guidance from, no on how much simpler they would assume this is rent-controlled. >> commissioner johnson that's my point i feel we have established the level of evidence that will make us feel
9:12 pm
comfortable not clear to the tenant and oats rent board has limited tools to give us the facts and commissioner vice president richards you made my point if we assume something that rent-controlled units unless proven otherwise that is entered into any calculation of which a unit rent-controlled is one i'm saying there are other policy considerations for this project before us and other discussions to be had about the relationship to the building next to it aesthetics and r5069 equipment and other things to discuss i believe that delaying this project for more information that is about things that are unclear if we can't prove something it can t take 2 as a truth why not discuss that - the other merits of project. >> commissioner hillis. >> i mean, i'm supportive of a
9:13 pm
continuance to get more information especially given what the board did a couple weeks ago as a rule about rent control are not as clear as we think and people add unit prior to 1979 and after 1979 if f there were a single-family home and you illegally added a shed didn't make it rent-controlled you can petition a rent board and get it is as is a single-family home not subject to rent control so sunk it is a complicated not very clear area and you add an aunt after 1979 into a single-family home you may be able to get the unit not rent control he suggest we continue to look at this for two weeks and have staff to look at evidence of a second unit and ask the rent board for
9:14 pm
clarification but clearly agree single-family home i think that is definitive it is not. >> at issue the department can request information from the rent board but has to come from the applicant so the departments is limited in terms of its powers it has to be part of submission and commissioner johnson. >> so i think i want to make that time limit before i is that note trying to get into a back and forth i like working with you. >> me, too me, too. >> rent control as a policy and sort of legislative matter happened in 1979 if the units were under and another up to this time in the future maybe coming we looking at rent control from the units are there you have something to work with
9:15 pm
with that said, i'd like to take a look at our future calendar i'll be a team player make a motion for a continuance. >> we have one. >> oh, was 2 seconded and october 13th. >> october 13th? >> shall i call the question? >> yeah. so - commissioner, i want to get clear direction on what staff needs to move forward with in terms of providing additional information to the commission i've heard a site visit if there are any evidence after a site dwelling unit and certainly advise the applicant keeping in mind if there's a respondent on the other end the rent board might not give back any type of resolution. >> from the project sponsor comes before us and provides
9:16 pm
that information as part of the project wouldn't that be of benefit. >> the issue that the rent board might not give them angle affirmative unless a tenant or someone on the side to confirm research one way or another the rent board - >> i hope i want the rebld here this the quadrant a form based two unit one was built two r before 1979 it was rent-controlled. >> maybe have the rent board here maybe the rent board to have the changes. >> commissioner hillis. >> i mean more me all indications point this is a single-family residences if our code not zoned but in the database and looks like a
9:17 pm
single-family residence i'll ask the department to inspect that to make sure this is not evidence of a second case we can handle that single-family residence is clear in the rebld they're not subject to rent control i'll be comfortable with that but evidence of a single-family residence we want to take to the next step to ask the rent board for a determination on what - >> commissioner moore. >> and want to remind you of my request for additional information on the design relative to a crossing cross section that is clearly indicated on drawings 8.2 what the equipment looks like in the section. >> commissioner to continue this matter until october 13th. >> commissioner hillis. >> commissioner johnson.
9:18 pm
>> commissioner koppel commissioner melgar commissioner moore commissioner vice president richards and commissioner president fong no. >> so moved, commissioners,. that motion passes 6 to one with commissioner president fong voting against. >> members of the public you may have come in after the original amazement for those of you can't find a seat we have one remaining item you all are here for if you want to occupy those chairs you can go ahead we have only one more staff person coming out to make their presentation i'll save one seat for her i take that back more than one you guys i apologize we'll need 3 seats for staff if you can't find a seat we have accommodated a overflow room if you could let the people outside know the south light court on
9:19 pm
the first year is convert into an overflow room you'll be able to see and hear the procedures in this room when your name is called if you're interested to submit our public testimony make our way into this room to submit our public testimony okay. but if you can't find a seat you'll not be allowed to stay in this room. >> jonas the commission will go ahead and take a short break. >> okay. very good very >> okay good afternoon and welcome back to the san francisco planning commission regular hearing for thursday, september 29, 2016, i'm reminded members of the public that
9:20 pm
any kind. proceedings. and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. also always your part of project sponsor team those of you standing and can't find a seat make your way to the light court when our name is called make your way back up to the roomed to make a public testimony unless you don't have a seat and not part of project sponsor team you'll have to exit the room. >> there is an oerment room on the set light court on the first floor you'll watch and hear those procedures
9:21 pm
great, thank you the commission chair has determined the project sponsor will receive a 10 minute presentation and the public comment will be limited to two minutes per person. >> good afternoon, commissioners nancy department staff also other colleagues that before i begin i've described hard copies of the categorical exemption and the material and sent e-mails to the commission and documents for review full name is a conditional use authorization request to establish institutional school use on cotter street it is an irregular shaped zoned rh1 in a height and bulk district located in the outer mission within an area of residential two or three single-family dwelling 31 thousand generate is a shared
9:22 pm
between the tenant of the garden and project sponsor the project sponsor gotten bridges school owns the property and will change the use the proposed institution will a be a second story with 41 bike parking spaces for loading and unloading i want to clarify for the record that the incorrect figures for open space and onsite the correct space is 31 thousand square feet plus not 33 thousand square feet and includes areas for living roof and walls and retention measures and rear calls open space for 20 students and full area part time staff
9:23 pm
and operations from 8:30 to 3:40 p.m. a summer program is proposed with operational between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to improve the circulation for a pickup and drop off with a school bus and traffic kaimg measures and modes of transportation to and from the school in 2010, the planning department opened a case while changes to the urban agriculture it became 234ri789d even if zoning district without entitlement in 2012, the neighborhood was established on cotter street for change of use one of the goals of inner ordinance to develop property owners to allow temporary
9:24 pm
agricultural on properties waiting developments such changes doesn't preclude other than agricultural from being established since publication of case report the department has public communication in support for beneficial use and beautiful and careful project design and others opposition with pollution and stormwater concerns the department supports the project finding the school use necessary and desirable with the neighborhood and represents approval with conditions for the following reasons the project does not seek modifications from standards, the project is consistent with obtains and policies of the general plan it has an educational plan and encourages alternative means of
9:25 pm
transportation and improves the environment it provides neighborhood educational use for the support of families in san francisco that concludes my presentation. i'm available to answer any questions and as are the environmental planners. >> the project sponsor please. we have a power point. >> okay. >> to the computer. >> nooimentz a jesse one of the founders of the school and the administration sdriks director gotten is the only outside school children spends 40 percent of their days on cotter street outside and it include raising children to have compassion empathy through experience or learning and story telling and artistic - we have
9:26 pm
never turned away a family for the lack of funds we're a neighborhood and will most of families live one $20 million and 2350i percent within walking distance of the site on cotter street founded in the mission district where the preschool is located and purchased coter street currently we have 67 grade school and gradually grow we're currently operating auto outing of the dimension height out of preschool and in the mission district and using the outside farm and san francisco parks and running out of space next year in terms of our community outreach we've had over a dozen
9:27 pm
meeting with the terrace and the excelsior improvement associations pleasing malia cohen's and joining the collaborative to listen and share information about the growth of our conditional and held that community meetings inviting the 5 had had feet radius in the excelsior to learn about our projects we've had several months of door to door can having in the excelsior district are we've sent 16 letters to residents either in the three hundred foot radius and met with supervisors in the past 3 years. >> in all of this neighborhood communication we've originally presented a completely different sightly planner we changed arithmetic and redesigned the campus now 74 percent of land is open space for use of farm and play, we've front yard the stormwater management including
9:28 pm
green roof and buyer planters and per marble pavers and added a circle to stop the drop off - we've added escaping to eliminate noise disruption we've had nearly. >> thousand letters of support is from the southern neighbors in san francisco over a hundred letters of support from a half a mile from the site and over 5 hundred loser that includes the green dots where all the families live we've done research on the schools in the 94402 and found nearly half of the 26 were in rh1 zones and one advantage is in an rh1 zoning and longfellow
9:29 pm
elementary has a lot of backyard neighbors and 11 across the street neighbors and done traffic studies i'll not borrow you mostly to say that it is already a light impact area where we'll agreeing add less than one car or less than 2 cars perishing per minute at peak time and written up a traffic management plan including the school bus and walking distance for schools grades our ad individual bikers? outside people that want to keep their kids outside and moving we've added 5 loading spots to add to the drop off off and pick up and includes strike enforcement measures. >> the stormwater management we understand it a very big deal
9:30 pm
for this property not only this property but bye the entire neighborhood experience flooding and recently received the san francisco public works did a model test of coter street with a hypothetical development and all of those shed no flooding intensity for 5 year storms we've added bio reconversation or retention and green roofs and will reduce this by 10 percent in a two year storm green roofs and 74 percent is left open to absorb water at sfpuc has said we're in compliance with the stormwater management ordinance and be resolved from the typical approval process over the cu and the school community is dedicated and telegraph hill working and lobbying with the puc to continue forward with the
9:31 pm
longer plans to solve the solution on a greater level. >> as important preserving the site use the golden bridge school will turn what is called a temporary commercial farm into a permanent and sustainable place for children to learn about farming our lease agreement with little city garden and the prior tenants stated the farm was temporary gotten bridge can not subsidy the farm we've spent over one thousand dollars to pay the mortgage for that space as well offering a cash subsidy to the farm gotten bridge schools reached out to the farm to find a permanent home and involved the city in the process ease offered our help our actually man power help to move.
9:32 pm
>> i'm sorry to pass this. >> good afternoon, commissioners stanley the architect wolf dissolve has a significant architecture originally are the work of rudolph and today, this means architecture that connects land and people and grows out of the site our building is woven with nature a landscape absorbing the sunlight and collecting water and changing with the seasons alive a building as a garden with a pathway of the golden bridge an hour glass of land with deturned around are attached houses the entry is on coter setback and keep that in mind the street into public plaza and drop off ear behind the school is a red perforated with open
9:33 pm
courts every room opens to the outside one side of the classmate the other common spaces stays in an accelerator that gives assess to the second level this is the second level of the classrooms there are 3 means of egress the building is sprinklers and one fire rated essential and dedicated safe dispersible area on the left of the slide the project has been reviewed by fire and building as well as independent code consultant and the other section is the classrooms and courts all of the rooms are green and vertical walls and gardens all the courts landscaped and planned with trees and have a friendly section of site 74 percent of
9:34 pm
land is unbuilt landscape the facade with hill with windows popping through evenlg the public front yard and drop off area at the end the school dissolves have the gotten bridge with a wild and primal on the left and orchard in the central third and playground and outside classroom courts and the front drop off on the right at the center of the school is a large multi purpose ramon room that opens from courts on 30 sides this is the heart the space open and closed with a golden bridge interjects on both levels on the gallery that building or building restraining
9:35 pm
order building and garden are about teaching the present and materials the object and land is part of a building this building is an educational landscape here the imagination and common sense of children what about nurtured and grow and creates an electrical ability to flourish to meet the members of society those wholesome values are the basis of this school. >> okay anyone else in the project sponsor team? that concludes okay opening up for public comment a lot of speaker cards going to call a bunch of names in batches if you're in the waiting room or the other room time to come up
9:36 pm
we'll ask supervising when in their name is called cue yourselves up on that side of room and two minutes i expect folks are similar comments if you can keep them educate to yourselves keep the process going >> (calling names). >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm clara local resident in bernal heights as a parent in preschooler and second grader at the gotten bridge school i'm here to voice my support i'm sure you know how important, however, i'm here to
9:37 pm
can you be u talk about was at the heart of the on or about our support for san francisco before i was a parent activists a teacher and talking about taught in the uk is an essential and unique school our families choose this because of the learning any children are thriving at the school this is this school is searching for a permanent place and in glen canyon and golden gate park and everyone afternoon we see by the color of the dirt on days he went to the farm he smells of architecture we know the wild areas and feels a confident and responsibility for farm and to the earth how they spent their days as we adults fight for who
9:38 pm
gets this piece of land how much our children connection with the land i calculate that over who years stanley spent many years and they've haeftdz and prepared 18 bowels of soup the land is having nor impact on people in the way the school needs the be longer or long term we stay here and halfway around the world wus of this school if we can't fulfill adversities vision my family will be forced to leave san francisco. >> next speaker, please. >> there we go. >> good afternoon. my name is banning a lifelong parents in the area i live in sunny side
9:39 pm
your son has been with the school going on 4 years i want to starter by saying what a unique school gotten bridges has the unique values to be creative and community oriented citizens i've seen my son grow in focus and values other people and the earth those are fundamental things and building that ass values are critical to san francisco in general it is a disservice to not raise up the standards the school has pan responsive in dooiks knowing both the community surrounding the farm i honestly feel the residents are lucky to have this school as a neighborhood rather than a developer or other school that doesn't hold the values
9:40 pm
earlier this year we are evicted from our home in the go mission district and this is a difficult time we had a new baby it was difficult to leave the home we started our family and we feel we did a lot of soul searching and our sons with golden bridge support it critical i've had a lot of conversation with families didn't feel that san francisco doesn't love us but the generous it is a real ray of hope in the city if they can't find a permanent home our home here is in in question i hope you'll say this as part of the issue thank you. >> good afternoon,
9:41 pm
commissioners my name is heather i'm here to voice my support for the proposal and so that a kindergartener at golden bridges we bike to the farm our family choose golden bridges because of it's dedication to social justice and the outdoor experiences before my son starting going to golden bridges we want to preschool in the mission everyday i felt sad dropping him off - sorry i was sad that he had to stay inside the whole time it is emotional sorry we come to love golden bridges our family is so them happier knowledge there because 83 he comes home from school and he
9:42 pm
empties his pockets instead of focusing on star wars and other things his attention a captured by the way that a seed can't be grown into an apple it is not only unique because of it's focus on outdoor education. >> scenic so education and justice this is the only school i know of that parents and faculty come together and talk about making the school an anti racist school not just talk it is become a place we can openingly talk about race and economic diversity and to me that is important because i'm a mother of mixed race children and i like others hear that it is a from the school can't find
9:43 pm
a home we'll face the decision whether or not we can stay in san francisco thank you. >> you're next. >> okay my name is john brown a husband of claire and i wanted to say that i wanted to talk about what it is that makes the education at the golden bridges the wall puts an emphasis on a beautiful place that feeds the child's natural creativity and deputies the. >> and nature we've seen how our son relatives to the open space on the street but the school needs a permanent home it needs to be a local one and which we and the other families
9:44 pm
can cycle or walk to i remember with fondness of days we and other families spent clearing the trash from the land on coter street and the commitment of determination to work through tough stuff and creating a beautiful learning environment this is a viable long term use for the lands and something the community and neighbors can be proud of and provides affordable local education opportunities to help families live in this part of san francisco that's why i think you should approve the application thank you. >> good afternoon. my name is rita i'm a neighbor i am the treasurer of mission terrace improvement association and an retired kindergarten teacher from san francisco unified school district speaking against the project there are two background points
9:45 pm
i'd like to make our neighborhood suffered collateral damage by the construction of interstate 280 and bart the sewer system was not properly engineered our neighbors have floodwater and sewage into as to their home secondly, the land on coter street is needed to mitigate the continuous flooding that exists on the lot because of if underground creek fast forward the structure by the project sponsor will add to the flooding problem more will think pouring into the sewers and less absorbed by the land little city gardens is a wonderful neighborhood their use of land absorbs the water we were so happy when little city gardens opened on coter street this long vacant lot was a place of beauty
9:46 pm
and open space and spliegs at late the lot was as gem in the neighborhood the garden blending that harmoniously with the potential on the rise, however, the promise where is broken the process that was in place to stash and sustain this urban farm was swept aside i suggest you. come and visit the sites the scale is inappropriate to the neighborhood we need help to correct the sewer system and the land on coter to remain a farm we love the peace and sincerely resilient of the peace please help us keep the place liveable and peace physical. >> we'll offer some accommodations folks with let's go kids if you have little ones
9:47 pm
if you want to come on up ahead of the line that would be great (calling names). >> how about i'm max speaking in support of school i'm born and raised and played hunger hippo at pier 39 i wanted to thank to the commission for hosting us today it is very comfortably to know there are systems and procedures in place for a school that needs to move forward and i
9:48 pm
know there are a lot of emotions by great to have a great system a system to fulfill our collective focus on having good way to run this city and how the city will be for the next generation looking at the vision i pulled from the wednesday night making san francisco the world's this is from our website the most liveable vision i share it the introduction to the school i saw just now kind of aligns with that i'm in the sustainable food business i believe in sustainability and the importance of teaching that to say the next generation i use it every single day this is from winning bat out of hell delta berry to cherish what remains of the architecture and fosters it's renewable our hope important survival those are
9:49 pm
tough words we're facing challenged as a community and it's important the next generation learns what we they need to wherever so how do we make san francisco the most liveable urban center how do we cherish the land and foster it's renewable everyone understand that green space and urban farmz is one method to doing that that is what is important about this school is brings that into the classmate how do we build that strong foundation working with the next generation. >> i'm sorry sir, your time is up. >> if you do run out of time you have something preempted written leave it on the railing. >> thank you very much. >> good afternoon. i'm margaret fox a parent of a new
9:50 pm
second grader at the golden bridges speaking in support my family my mom from san francisco moved here two years ago in 2014 one week before public school began and looking at that vantage point i no idea how complicated 1, 2, 3, 4 school system we navigateed until we found out about golden bridges from the research it is one of two schools the other one in the richmond that is even marginally affordable outside of catholic schools question have a 3-year-old that will be joining us at golden bridges we're brand new to the schools brought a level of calm and comfort to our family a very open and welcoming
9:51 pm
place and i think i'm a practical level so needed in the city so have a place for the candle stick park to go to school and have options thank you very much. >> hi, my name is wendy i'm a - live on cayuga directing around the chiropractor from the proposed development i'm speaking in opposition we want to say this project has high powder financial support question are small office spaces we have flooding was the inadequate sewage back up our homes are flooded with sewage a major health hazard and currently a latitude pending against the city of san francisco by neighborhoods residents because of the loss and gage of the inadequate
9:52 pm
sewage system we face the rainy season with dread and sandbags around our property some people have inches and some feet of raw sewage that was a fema site with personal belongings lynn the street the puc natural management asset adding more people to the neighborhood flushing the toilets is not a good thing their rainwater system doesn't go help this will add add water for the flooding situation we face every rainy season i want to say we're not against schools my daughter attended an independent school this school has a lovely program
9:53 pm
not about that but the development will be a disaster for the neighbors putting us in further risk of damage this any large development adds to our stress we have a lot to deal with i'm talking about sewage in our homes this will cause nor damage to our homes thank you. >> once you start speaking sfgovtv about turn that on. >> let's talk about flooding i live director across the street from this i've lived in san francisco since 1987 this development and rooted in a way to do good is the wrong idea for
9:54 pm
this piece of land planning code section states that such feature as proposed will not be detrimental to the health or safety or a injures to property for those unfortunately living and working in the terrace this puts our health at realistic the pictures can you see those this is what happened in 2014 the picture on the left a picture taken of the lot in front of the 203 coter spewing fees the pictures on the right is the sewer blowing on the corner of san jose and the top picture it has mat people shifting through our blornz belongings. >> this next picture -
9:55 pm
>> is actually our home our home received 2 feet of stormwater and sewage the plans on file address did two year rain event point out that mission terrace received two, 10 year storms and 5 every two the plans on file are inadequate to address climatic change will make that worse you have a study we believe the b mp uses invalid assumptions and last night we received for the fit new information from the puc and dpw we've not addressed or look at. >> thank you, ma'am, your time is up. >> thank you. >> thank you.
9:56 pm
>> next speaker, please. >> hello thank you my name is rick on coter street director across the street from the farming yes might house was flooded during the storms in 2014 i'm here to talk about traffic and my concerns about the parking and traffic at the proposed project as it was add a substantial amount of traffic to cot era 1 way narrow street from san jose avenue down to alamany boulevard i have a slide here or an image if you want to turn on the overhead to show you the narrow street let's see here - >> all right. well okay. this is not doing an adequate job a 1 lane street with parking
9:57 pm
on either side of the street and i think one of the concerns we have it makes this school location such a danger is the 200 accomplice students and participants and faculties that will be going down the street in an event of an emergency you know as we witnessed i've witnessed as a parent and students are dropped off they street no immediate parking they double park in the middle of the street blocking traffic with the hazard lights on where this becomes critical in the event of a fire, flooder earthquake or some disaster and the question if participants are coming to collect their children and no place to park and double park in the street with the hazard how are emergency vehicles to get to this location it is a critical concern so just something to
9:58 pm
think about. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hi my name is keri lived in san francisco for 23 requesters and moved to mission terrace in early 2011 my home as well as has flooded this is a diverse group of people diverse languages and seniors and surprising a large number of educators and hard working people part of what made this neighborhood great has been to the 3203 coter street and bauptd our neighborhood together give extra vegetations and flowers to the neighborhood and put on poetry reading and have a gathering place for neighbors
9:59 pm
they really are the heart of the neighborhood we have had 8 hundred and 29 petitions that oppose the development and trying to preserve the open space for golden bridges a number of their letters actually are from not they say they're from san francisco residents but actually from places outside of san francisco outside of bay area outside of california we found one from australia so the people in san francisco that are 0 supportive you need to understand from the beginning when this was proposed we were told it would be a small school a handful of people working in conjunction and we were in support of that but every turn it has the defied the scope i know i'm being cut off i implore the commission to listen to the people that live in mission
10:00 pm
terrace and impacted by the real concerns so for our homes please do right by your neighborhood preserve your shrinking open spaces and preserve the open spaces to make this city great i appreciate thank you for your time. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> thanks for letting me jump the line i'm an excelsior resident a parents of 2 eventually 3 kids my family lives 3 blocks from the location if you're a parent you know how excited i am to be walking my kids to school i want you to know what the school means to me we navigated the unif i had lottery we didn't get our neighborhood school
51 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV: San Francisco Government TelevisionUploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1583057277)