foods. the home delivered grocery program serves low income and frail in unable to access healthy food choices and unable to come to the pantry site. so for this ad back funds we are allowing golden gate senior services to expand their program and to serve additional seniors and adults with disabilities. be able to add additional service scope for volunteers and recruitment and development. as we know volunteers have been a critical important piece in this program. for the in the presented budget you can also see that there is a 138,000 actually goes to the subcontractor,, richmond district neighborhood center who actually operated a home delivered grocery program and food pantry program. so

with this additional ad back actually for the home delivered grocery we will be able to increase from 3500 250 5200 bags. for the new pantry bags we will be able to add in around 17,000 bags distribution to the eligible target populations. so pending your questions i seek your approval to modify this grant. >> thank you good any comets or questions from the commission? and he comes of questions from the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item ee. requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with san francisco marin the food bank for the provision of food pantry program are in the period of july 1, 2012 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of 589,007 or two dollars

for revised total grant of $1.2 million less a trend 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed $1.3 million. what a motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> thank you. sarah >> san francisco marin food bank pantry program as it provides food bags to the above mentioned home delivery rose 3 programs. and other partners. also, with this ad back expansion we will be will to serve additional clients. you can see the program actually increased a lot increased a lot increased a lotabout roadcrew a lot. so the program actually was calledbrownback program but

it was a five-year contract and this year is actually the last year. so we only ask to modify this year. the ad back funds will enable us to add additional 82,000 food bags to restore the service level 215-16 and also significantly expand our services to meet the growing needs to the target population which are seniors and adults with disabilities. the contractor is able to expand the participating pantry sites to up to 21 sites and we were able to see that across the town and basically every district will at least have one pantry site that we can reach our target population and will be easier accessible to our target population. so the revised above budget in front of you will include both pantry food bags and home delivered grocery food bags. pending your

questions, i will seek your approval to modify this grant. >> thank you. any come to questions of the commission? comments or questions of the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> item ff requesting authorization to modify the grant agreement with the san francisco marine food bank for the provision of home delivered groceries during the period of july 1, 2012 through june 30, 2017 in the addition amount of one or $43,000 to revised total of $612,000 plus a 10% contingency for revised total grant amount not to exceed $673,000. motion to discuss? >> moved and seconded. >> san francisco marine food bank partnership with home delivered meals providers to deliver those bags this grant

is actually five years of agreement and until the end of this fiscal year again this is the last piece and the ad that will enable dos to add an additional 11,000 bags to restore the services up to the 15-16 service level and enabled to expand the services to include one additional undeliverable deal partner and to meet the growing needs in our community. the budget presented in front of you actually shows there is around 120,000 it is a pass through to the home delivered meal providers who deliver those bags. you see it is both the food cost, the food bag cost and the past through with the

partners. so pending any questions my secure approval to modify this grant. >> thank you. and he comes of questions? >> on this last food preparation. i just have a comment because i been attending meetings regarding emergency preparedness, earthquake and what have you. i just want to the nutrition people to think about that because they expect that san francisco a lot of elderly will be affected. so not only the people who are not getting deals here but we may have an additional people who have their own separation of doing their own meal. so we might want to think of that. the library is on board with looking at earthquake and recreation and parks. i think

what they are saying is that the population of the elderly and the handicapped particularly, the elderly will be affected in san francisco. so i just want you to think about that >> thank you. that's a very good point >> for looking up preparation what were doing about that. >> right. that's a good point. the cities already in conversations with home delivered meal providers and congregate meal providers around emergency preparedness and has been for actually many years. so we have been talking and thinking about that and planning for that. >> okay. >> okay, thank you >> any other comments or questions commissioners? any, so questions of the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries. >>[gavel] >> just an observation a suggestion i don't know if it's possible but at least 10 of these contact one of occasions for less than $25,000. couldn't put on a consent agenda? >> again this is john-ages 800 this answer a lot of debate between program and contacts

whether we put on the consent agenda where we show it individual. this represents a whole set of ad backs and where distributing the funds that were we sought needs trying to meet the needs of the population in terms of delivered foods and congregate meals. though the question really was, in terms of transparency and showing the public as was the commission we are we are distributing the funds and how much, to put it all on the agenda were to section off a part the 10 items into do it as consent, depending on the preference of this commission we can do it either way. in the future good enough to be good for us to know how you want to proceed with that. >> thank you. it's up to the chairman but my suggestion would we have this many contracts as many as we can put on the consent agenda is transparent and of any commissioners have questions they can raise and it would expedite the process. just a suggestion >> yes. the only thing all of

the reports,, i know we just was just so much. so we don't want to do this too often to our advisory council and all the other committees that want to report. so i think it would be a wise to put this >> i would say myself on a contract that was kind of pushing to have the information more out there. what program adjusted was to actually identify the items in the general memo that you received so you know these are items included but not to have them as separate agenda items that we can do that in the future. >> i would say that i am fine with that for most noncontroversial or very standard low-budget increase. the place where i would call exception of things like this to mosey centerlines negotiation where i think it's important for us to expose

those fax in the public forum just because there's a contract for at least that's under negotiation apparently is unsettled. we are awarding money in at this patient will be. it's a little bit important for that to be publicly exposed. >> okay. >> thank you. >> final item, gg review and approval of revision 1 to the 2016-17 dda area plan budget. martha peterson present in. >> good morning executive director mcspadden president james and commission. my name is martha peterson i work with the human services agency budget unit them here before you this moment last for your review and approval for vision number one to the fiscal year 16-17 area plan budget. the net effect of these changes from the base plan budget this year six and-17 is an increase of

238,000 in the area plan budget for new total of $5,000,506,000 . i will of this total 150,000 or six and 46 is from reallocated or increase allocation from the federal government. additional one-time state funding of $66,593 specifically for the home delivered meals program and $21,309 from additional state funds for the state health facilities penalties account. attached to the commission memo details the area plan fluctuations in federal and state funding by title and dos program staff recommended actions. the program defendant include support services congregate a home delivered nutrition disease prevention

family caregiver ombudsman and elder abuse prevention as well as administration funding for these programs. the local support is not included. an earlier version of this commission memo included an incorrect total for the ombudsman program. provides annual contract total is four and $76,000 when it $36. 621% of this increase in the area plan funding is a spike in the nutrition program with a total of 46,300 in the congregate meals program and $99,000 for the home delivered meals program. these one-time funds were included with the app back dollars overallocated earlier today. which with approval of this item staff will make the appropriate contract modifications please, let me know if you have questions. >> thank you. any constant questions from the commission? >> yes. on the combustion state health citation account. what is that about? >> those funds are actually,

they are collected as a result of state and federal civil penalties imposed against health facilities for noncompliance with state and federal laws and those funds are broken out into a federal account and a state account. so when the state funds-when the state receives those funds they allocate those according to the and allocation limits abided by all of the counties within the states. so that we allocation of those funds back to the county. >> okay. >> thank you. any other comments or questions from the commission?, took questions from the public? hearing none, all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] opposed? the motion carries >>[gavel] >> we are at the end of the agenda. >> any general public comment. >> we tabled everything did not push anything to the end. >> do we want to continue?

the things we tabled you want to do them now would you want to - >>[inaudible] [off mic] we will table them thank you everyone. >> we have an announcement? >> any announcements? >> any announcements? i apologize to the people i have asked to table your viewport but we were afraid that we might not be held over and we want to make sure all these contracts get her good so i apologize. i have to buy some ice cream but anyway, thank you very much for your time. any public comment? no announcements can deny the motion to adjourn >> moved and seconded. >> it's been moved and second. we are to adjourn the meeting. all those in favor say, aye >>[chorus of ayes] the ayes have it. the motion carries.

>>[gavel] >>[adjournment] >> >> >> light for our city and our streets illuminating our ideas and values starting in 2016 the san francisco public utilities commission is xhoefl that light with new led with the did i audits for better light for streets and pedestrian and they're even better for this vitally lasting longer and consuming up to 50 percent less energy upgrading takes thirty minutes remove the old street light and

repeat 18 thousand 5 hundred times while our street lights will be improving the clean energy will remain the same every san francisco street light is powder by 100 percent godfathers hetch hetchy power in one simple word serious as day turns

>> tuesday, october 18, 2016, meeting of the san francisco entertainment commission my name is a bryant tan the president and a few housekeeping items one please turn off your cell phones or on vibrate not to interrupt the meeting and two if you're a member of the public i don't see