process i'm sorry you don't know i don't think so what is so calculated about that. >> the financing of it. >> the financing portion but not the actual plan. >> except for financing how much dollars into this if we go in that direction. >> is there a plan to finance. >> that's something we'll have to determine and again, if we - figure out how we can move our dollars if this is the necessary match for us so that's where we need to have more conversations. >> to be totally clear i don't want the department to come back in thirty days and not have anything if 90 days is the reasonable timeframes in 90 days this board can expect to the transportation demand management plan but not necessarily the financing plan.

>> that's right that's right. >> and over the long term i understand that we have so many large projects and i believe that is a long term process the estimate for the plan that is not articulated is roughly 32. >> 32 to 28 and a $32 million from ucsf to offset the loss that would be helpful in getting the transportation demand management to get the plan in 90 days to get a sense of the $10 million can cover in the offset and hopefully significant portions of the plan so their peace meal i know capital improvement plan and plans you it would be nice to move pieces forward as is financing comes in versus you know we have this $10 million that will sit there because the overall plan didn't

have portions that can move forward diddling to mitigate that will be one of my suggestions the second as you said on top of the $10 million will be expected parking revenue do you know what that projected revenue is? >> per year. >> supervisor i don't have the precise figures with me and there are shades of this as supervisor peskin referred to one of the calculations is not only how much revenue is generated by the space but the net of the revenue and the operating costs. >> right. >> so that we will not impact the base funds for the muni system and we're committed to that but that is one of the things we are in the process of working throw at mta and the controller's office is to determine what that level of

incidentally credential funding and part of analysis that will take us more time. >> do you think we'll be able to have that analysis in 90 days if we get the revenue generated minus the cost of running that service. >> absolutely one 90 days to present the economics of the overall expansion would look like and what the impact of the new spaces and rate changes. >> so in terms of the $10 million that has been committed by ucsf to offset the loss of those one and thirty parking spots where will the $10 million fit. >> and is it in one lump payment and will be in the department of health there is a provision in the l d da that essentially says that will set

in a segregated account for the dedicated use and little department of health is spend down the $10 million at any point. >> yes. as along we've identified a use that is consistent with the $10 million. >> and that we have succinct to appropriation authority. >> i'm curious from the budget committee had considered putting this on budget committee reserve to make sure that is a plan before the board and did board what review it before the spending of the dollars. >> certainly in the reason it didn't come before the budget committee it is coming the concept of the apprenticeship $10 million is going coming to you in the lbd a secondly, the money has not been appropriated

and will not be appropriated before this is a subsequent action so start spending 2 at many times explicit with a the approval from the board of supervisors appropriately the dollars. >> that will be through the larger budget process or separating. >> a larger budget process that will be another approval. >> the reason i propose it should come from the larger budget committee your intimating involved with you know i think the board gets a lot of different balls in the air so we may not be fine tuning through the line by line the duct bucket in terms of how they're spending down this money for the tdm i think this board is particularly

interested in the proposal that would be my suggestion to get a separate presentation on the tdm so we can get feedback as well to the dpw and mta and as well as our community resident and neighbors that brought those concerns about traffic and congestion they can give input my suggestion would be to put the $10 million on the budget committee reserve to the budget committee can get a presentation on the tdm before that money is spent down allows the public to weigh in on their priorities as well and be they like the whole plan but this portion is should move forward that's how we want to prioritize that's my suggestion not the l dda but the tdm program not before us that's why everyone is asking lots of questions before necessary vote

on the l dda but to move forward to focus on the pieces that you know this board is concerned about on behalf of the permit holder community. >> supervisor we're comfortable with that and work with the controller's office so those dollars are flagged and we'll have a separate presentation and accounting so we have the boards blessing to move forward with the expansion. >> just to the ucsf community as well i want to recognize that your work is unique and different from other types of employers here in san francisco i know if our conversation last week i was made to see the employees that walk and bike to work i thought unusually low that would be great if mta will work with ucsf to there the

modes of transportation we understand that people are working night shift they'll want to drive and not as high as other employers in san francisco i think that is that is important for university of california, san francisco to help our city meet our goals around a transit first city and where employees can bike do car share and take public transit to figure out those incentives sluchs and i've seen the uptick in traffic and great to continue to work on that as a long term goal for all the stakeholders that are here today. >> supervisor farrell. >> okay supervisor president breed. >> colleagues i think

supervisor kim you summoned that up presidential making sure we separate the issues but they're part and parcel to our conversation director garcia i appreciate the comments and the notion we've talked about so forth on the continuance and coming back and reporting and continue can you can you talk a little bit about how that effects the project itself. >> barbara garcia director of health i'd like the supervisors to take the vote on the l t b.a. i feel that ucsf has made their commitment for the parking that will be displaced i don't want to delay this we need to get the regents to go forward and move on their process this is a my position i understand the supervisors. >> just to understand there is a timing issue related to this.

>> the construction and beginning of construction. >> okay. >> thank you supervisor farrell supervisor cohen thank you very much the conversation was robust i want to acknowledge that often all the doctors and medical professionals in the chamber you guys are the senate itself ones in the room with the terms and terminologies you're for familiar with i want to acknowledge supervisor kim's rashgs those are the same remarks why we're here and the issue we're here to discuss and that is the l dda the least disposition and the land use term and i wanted to talk about to the point that supervisor ronen mentioned she asked we can continue one week to get a what in writing exactly through the chair. >> supervisor ronen. >> so i just learned from the

city attorney we can amended the ordinance before us today to note the commitment on behalf of the uflgz university of california, san francisco to maintain one and thirty parking spaces for the faculty and staff at the mission bay campus if we are able to do that today and that is the contract is amended before us to include that that makes me comfortable to approve it today. >> supervisor cohen. >> thank you very much ladies and gentlemen, that's democracy in action that is how good policy is created thank you supervisor ronen he was going to - and commissioner tang you worked collaboratively with the city attorney supervisor kim mentioned something about a budget committee reserve could ucsf i want the difference continue budget committee reserve and controller reserve.

>> i'm sorry ben rosenfield the controller. >> supervisors ben rosenfield controller different reserves are practiced by different parties i think mr. wagner was referencing flagging the budget committee can consider putting a board require. >> a board reserve. >> that's correct that's what i understand. >> i understood that two but supervisor kim said budget committee reserve i wanted to make sure that we are clear so show me guidance through the chair please. supervisor kim. >> yes. i'm sorry, i said budget committee board of supervisors reserve. >> okay. >> it essentially assuring that the budget committee gets a presentation on dpws spend down

of the especially $10 million before me spend it down it will happen before the money gets spent that will allow the board an opportunity to get impact to the department of health and sfmta on the plan and will allow the members of the public and our constituents to give feedback as well either on components that might be missing things they like strengthened or the prioritization of what parts of plan gets funded first clearly the $10 million will not funded the entire. >> i appreciate supervisor kim our clarity i'm in agreement i want to see support a budget reserve ladies and gentlemen, that are here we want to bring to your attention we're not taking public comment we took if the but if you stand in support of this project please stand up we can recognition you thank you

very much for being here you may have a seat. and all people standing in opposition please stand point oh, a couple back there. >> please no attacks after the meeting thank you. >> i also want the roesht to say there are registered concerns about this particular item so we have as a matter of public record to speak it into existence in closing he just want to say thank you to everyone that is really been hands on on that particular project i'll supporting this project as it move forward and the amendments before us thank you very much ladies for being part of discussion and i want to

recognize the incredible staff at the ucsf that helped us to get over the hurdle and dpw and recognize i don't i don't chang on any staff and hillary ronen staff and other staff thank you supervisor ronen. >> i wanted to note that was supervisor tang who figured out that we could make the amendments today to relieve my concerns thank you you've been looking at for mirror my my constituents so swp i'd like to make a motion to amend the ordinance to reflect that ucsf will maintain one and thirty parking spaces for the offset of one thirty parking spaces from

ucsf campus. >> seconded by supervisor tang colleagues without objection, without objection the amendment passed unanimously anything else supervisor ronen that's it okay. >> supervisor safai. >> thank you just one last point of clarification we were talking about putting money on reserve and spending down apprenticeship $10 million in determining can answer one more quick question the $10 million will replace and expand the parking space we're talking about expanding the garage we're talking about a spend plan clarify the $10 million will be used for parking mitigation. >> oh, and. >> used for the expanding. >> might not be used inform expand the parking.

>> i can't answer that. >> just to be clear that decision will come before this body. >> before anything it spent; correct? >> supervisor sheehy. >> that's it as okay supervisor sheehy yeah through the chair add one voice that's not been present as far that's the patients so it is rare for a major academic research institution to desolate resources that impact people living if poverty the people that can't afford insurance people talk about ucsf and all the money important mission bay that tends to look at a different set of diseases than san francisco general i really want to commend supervisor ronen for finding a way out of this if i understand the parking issues and in that neighborhood

because every weeks delay means a cure for someone who gets care at san francisco general is one week away and so i think that is really important to remember the urgency felt by patient who needs 20th century this vital research to alleviate their suffering to commend supervisor ronen for her brilliant and supervisor tang for figuring out this out seeing no other names on the roster, madam clerk on the item as amended can you please call roll. >> supervisor farrell supervisor fewer supervisor kim supervisor peskin supervisor ronen supervisor safai supervisor sheehy commissioner tang supervisor yee

supervisor breed supervisor cohen there are 11 i's. >> the ordinance as amended passed unanimously on first reading. >> (clapping.) >> thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for being here. >> all right. we'll have a special order 2:30 p.m. - supervisor ronen will be doing the special order 2:30 p.m. - and thank you to all the doctors and researchers and staff that came out today. >> thank you oh, nice please exit the chamber quietly thank you. >> see you soon

(laughter) see you soon. >> thank you. >> that's good work katie thank you. >> if you guys can clear the chambers thank you take that conversation outside so we can

continue. >> all right. folks if we can student down and stop talking we'll go to the recognition of commendations. >> if i can call up nancy and kathy up to the mike. >> so i'm going to - yes. >> (clapping.) >> so i'll start with a question had was harder being on a 4

hundred or 200 and 70 foot crane for 14 hours or listening to the board of supervisors talk about an ground lease for a half an hour i'm sorry it took so long. >> staying hours we are similarly thankful. >> the excitement so i want to say that i can't feel for honor and pride today in recognizing you both you know for those of you who don't know nancy hernandez and karen two counselors resisters who along with 5 mechanics of green peace the majority of women liemgd a 200 and 70 foot crane in washington, d.c. wednesday january 25th frontals

climbed the crane damaged for 14 housing i can't believe that you did that hanging a banner that said resist in clear view behind the white house. >> (clapping.) >> so i want to tell you a little bit about 80s incredible women nancy hernandez a bernal resident 5th on eviction if bres that's a whole other issue is a mission activist youth worker and mural i thought that spent over 18 years incorporating art and direct action into the bay area social justice movement and dedicated to the youth and known for her beautiful murals and

works at goornz i saw mario who was here in the mission district and has been a local drummer for how many years. >> a lot and is really just an inspiration for so many which of us in the mission i want you know that my husband calls you the popular person in our household karen as been involved with green peace and served on the brovrz president and not only a freelance but activist we're till a district 8 resident by supervisor sheehy and i are

fighting over you want to claim you we'll share and you live on guerrero street i was so excited to learn your murder to peg stevenson of the controller's office. >> (clapping.) >> incidental everyone needs to see that live and work this is incredible we attempted up a video of nancy on the crane are sending a message to everyone in san francisco i want you to see that for effect ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ ♪ it is a message to it effects more than that plus a love letter to you it is our responsibility to fix it that's why we're out here today >> i'm very, very afraid of heights but today, i climbed up one hundred feet to get out of any comfort zone to say resist. >> (clapping.) >> ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

. >> (clapping.) >> before interning it over to supervisor sheehy we're facing unprecedented treats to our freedoms and constitution and really is creative non-violence actions that will safe this country so i cheer everyone i've watched that several times when i needed precision that is that truly that spying but on behalf of the board of supervisors thank you to fighting and inspiring us i also want to briefly mentioned i am glad to see our form controller you came out to join us in recognition you today so thank you so much. >> (clapping.) >> thank you supervisor ronen for honoring this heroic work

that is powerful and like to expend the boarders honor to my resident of my district i'm very yes, ma'am athletic have a fear of heights myself i can imagine what that was like but hanging a message of december sent you had that fear of heights sends a powerful powerful message of resistance to it administration i want to note - so i worked for green peace in the early 90s so knock on doors across the bay area and develop actions during the day thank you for your your thirty years of commitment and ed for your doesn't the to the organization we're living in difficult times this kind of resistance is what we need so thank you, thank you, thank you.

>> (clapping.) >> so i want to say that resistance begins at home and i'm regrateful to the city and the people of san francisco for instilling within me a deep sense of justice and a fearlessness i know we have heroes every time you stand up for people is highly commendable i hope the rest of the board looks to supervisor kim it she's a fearless leader for the people you guys have a position of power and in this climate will be a lot of brussel in front of us a lot of the young people have tons of fear about immigration status fears of their parent taken from them our center was rated by ice last week the fear in the midst and

the fear the police and the fear that officers have been getting away with murder and killing people without repercussions and fear of evictions a resolution that was put up in front of you guys to protect the teachers from being evicted during the school year that was constituted u shut down there is a fear you guys love the city more than the city loves you when the police officers association cantonese comes after i hope that type of resistance this banner can come to mind that our ability to conquer our fear of heights and the conquer fear of being arrested pass on a fearlessness you have the police officers association and have a ton of people maybe hating on you when

and lennar in our area and corporations building condos and van guard and out companies trying to evict families when you stand up for the people of san francisco you are in defiance against those who prioritize profits over people when you do that and stand up are for people in opposition to profit your inspirational when you are quiet and stick your headnote stand with that current administration around climatic change we see that i hope that message is a message of hope that we're not focusing on saying not to delay this president or any one policy but a symbol of consistent vision for a better future and so i hope that some of of our fearlessness will be passed on i got it it from the students we

hope you guys can stand up as stoppage as you possibly can to the forces that are in front of the i that choose to sell san francisco's soul out to profit. >> (clapping.) >> i want to thank the board of supervisors for recognizing our resistance high above the city of washington, d.c. i've been an activists for more than 35 years monthly the government's response to my work is sue me i've been on trial twice and defended meaningful in rhode island and connecticut and arrested more than 35 times in 5 states always with the vision and hope for a better world whether it is a worlds mount without nuclear weapons or a

world we protect the human rights of everyone i do this with a strong commitment to non-violation when i was stavrnd one hundred feet above the ground i had to crawl on the platform because standing up was way to difficult i stayed those and tweeted and did interviews and took photographs because that was far more important than anything else our physical fears with nothing in comparison to the fear i have of what this government can do without 0 voice whether plants or animals or people that physically can't speak out they fear deportation or incarceration so that is why i do what i do i will continue to do what i do and grateful for the city of san francisco for

recognizing the importance and criticalness of non-violate direct action our country was built on it next we're doing one of the actions who can i call on to do that with me who supervisor jane kim we will ask you to join us we need you thank you. >> (clapping.) >> thank you. >> thank you so much. >> i only live a block away - >> i'm loyal to district 8 percent. >> i know you're good at hanging banners. >> the last time i got arrested for the record but

advocating for justice. >> 1, 2, 3 rode 1, 2, 3 we had people lie e rode 1, 2, 3 we had people lieye you. >> thank you and congratulations. >> (clapping.) >> okay with that, madam clerk let's go back to item number 28. >> item 28 an ordinance to amend the tax regulations code to remove the one hundred there's penalty from one of the penlites failing to register and remove the fee from a duplicate

register certify. >> roll call. >> supervisor farrell supervisor fewer supervisor kim supervisor peskin supervisor ronen supervisor safai supervisor sheehy supervisor tang supervisor yee supervisor breed supervisor cohen there are 11 i's. >> the ordinance is passed unanimously on the first reading next item. >> >> the airport development plan including in the requirement for a feasibility study and the board of supervisors determination prior to initially the environmental review but for the future individual projects under the recommended airport colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection the ordinance

passed on the first reading next item. >> thirty for the tax regulations and police code to eliminate fees comboetdz by the city. >> same house, same call? without objection this ordinance passes unanimously. >> item 31 to appropriate 34 point applies to the department of emergency management for public safety in fiscal year 2016-2017 and to place appropriation on the controllers reserve for the procedures from the financing same house, same call? without objection the ordinance passes. >> item 32 a resolution to fix the prevailing wage rates under the city contractors for public works and improvements. >> same house, same call? without objection it is that item passes. >> madam clerk item 33 through

37 together. >> item 3 to authors the department of the environment to accept and expend 46 thousand from the association of bay area to perform activities as part of by the way, regional program through 2015 and item 43 a resolution to authorize the rec and park department to accept a one and 47 in kind grant from the parks alliance and resolution to retroactively authorize the department of health to accept and expend an approximate 4 hundred plus grant from the department of health for the prescription drug overdose through august 31st, 2019, and item 36 to retrofitting to send 200 plus grant from the community clinic consortium for health care for the homeless or health captains

through 2016 and waving indirect cost and retrofitting direct the department of health to accept and expend three hundred plus from the department of public health department to participate in the project known as the cam launch through june 2019 and waving the indirect costs colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection the resolutions are adopted unanimously. >> item 38. >> to improve an emergency declaration for the replacement and repair the equipment at the wairmentd with the total expected costs of $435,000 interest same house, same call? without objection it is adopted unanimously. >> item 39 to amend the planning code to establish the

citywide transportation demand management program required to incorporate the design features and incentives and tools that support a constitutional form of transportation to create an administrator fee for various sections of planning code and make ceqa and other other appropriated fshtsd and determinations. >> supervisor cohen my understanding you have amendments. >> thank you for recognizing me colleagues we want to briefing present to you some legislation that was sponsored by our former colleague supervisor avalos i sent picked up as a sponsor and want to recognize any co-sponsor supervisor sheehy so the the item before you establishes the transportation demand management or tdm program spoken a lot about it earlier item item 27 i think that is a fact we've acknowledged and accepted that will 10 thousand new people will

be arriving in san francisco every year and projected the city will add one and 90 thousand jobs and one hundred homes 2040 that's why we embarked on the tps when is a multi-agency effort to improve the transportation so we may accommodate this new growth the tps has 3 commons first the transportation steering committee's sustainability fees the board of supervisors took action last year the second element we have replaced our level of service analysis with analysis that looks at vehicle

miles traveled v m s is consistent with the state policy and a better standard for environmental review and the third and finally element of tdm program that will be the item we're voting on to through that program developers will provide an onsite amenities like bike that concludes my remarks and childcare and car share that will reduce driving trips from other projects now essentially the city has developed a memo of 66 sustainable transportation option the people will incorporate into their projects developers use the t memo to choose the measures that will get the target thresholds i don't want to get into the weeds

foerdz the planning commission has approved but the specific item before us is the tdm ordinance which clearly sets out the policy and articulates the. >> be mriblt plan reminders the planning department mta said the last year reaching out to various are stakeholders and including transit advocates, affordable housing advocates and developers to help us shape this program we also had many robust land use committee meetings about this item and where we discussed various amendments and jaufltsz this is the result of a collaborative effort i want to acknowledge a few people the planning department and mta victor wise and wade w and corey teague i'm sorry wade i can't pronounce your last name close

enough maybe i need more time to work on tdm to get down that name want to acknowledge those folks are committed their lives to this particular piece of legislation and been tireless leases on this program so, so i several amendments to address concerns we've heard from the community input on the draft tdm plan first loud and clear the public wants to weigh in an tdm plan prior prior to project approval i believe those amendments speak to those concerns you have those amendments in this document that was circulated earlier this afternoon the first amendment is simply clarifying line 6 through

8 adds development agreement unquote to clarify that both development applications and development agreements approved before the effective date of ordinances are not subject to the tdm program the second amendment before us on page 9 line 18 which requires the project sponsors discuss this prior to the project application including preapplications meetings and solicit feedback from the community to be take into consideration in preparing the proposed testimony plan the third amendment and final one on page 9 line 18 is simply required a draft tdm plan be submitted with any preliminary applications or assessment and

this most certainly includes p pa circulations thank you, again i hope to have our sport and want to acknowledge the collaborative effort that transpired to make that a document we can get behind. >> thank you cobra madam clerk add me as a co-sponsor supervisor cohen has made a motion to amend seconded by supervisor peskin colleagues without objection, without objection the amendment passed unanimously supervisor fewer. >> yes. thank you supervisor president breed so i want to thank supervisor cohen for taking the leadership on this and apologize to any colleagues, of course, i have been just in my office less than a month i'm catching up i appreciate this conversation about how to shift the residents for miles of travels from

depending on a car for reliable alternatives whether walking or biking considering there is some spent a lot of time 45 thousand uber and lyft drivers it is critical there is a transportation demand management program in place i do, however, have concerns with the draft memo of options in the current form when i look at the memo of 66 options to reduce the traveled miles i'm concerned for example, having the measures to improve the walking conditions is one point but shuttle service gets a because of of 7 to 14 points why only one to 5 more affordable housing by voting on the tdm program today, we are making a policy call san francisco has taken a statement we're a vision zero city and transit first city the point

system tells me a different story he how we calculate the transportation measures i don't believe we share more than 7 to 14 points for providing shuttle service and invite this to further define the sustainable transportation so i am asking around about the c c-6 point and how those were developed i understand i'm coming in what's to the conversation so just asking for edit information how this aligns with vision zero plan. >> thank you supervisor fewer are your comments directed to the sponsor the legislation. >> yes. please. okay supervisor cohen. >> yes. thank you yes supervisor president breed. >> with you like to defer to

staff. >> yes. i would like to defer to staff to respond. >> good afternoon wade senior planner planning department the way we developed the memo and the assignments of points for the individual measures in the memo was around the policy of reducing vehicle miles traveled so that was the policy framework we remember working in the points were allocated based upon how effective they are at reducing vehicles miles traveled so you're calling out the shuttle measure that was identified as a lot of points because it has been proven to be effective averages and vehicle miles traveled just because there is a point value and a number of points

higher than versus other measures those options are available didn't mean those make sense for every development and doesn't necessarily mean that the city would approve every measure selected by a developer in their tdm plan and the shuttle measure in particular there are - we don't think this measure will be selected infrequently it is a costly measure the shuttle is at a minimum of 15 minutes during peak housing or thirty outside of peak hours that is a costing type of operational expense for a development that most developments will not select and second the measure requires a staff recommendation from the sfmta regarding whether or not it should be approved and mta can speak to some of the considerations they'll look at t at that particular measure but

again, we don't - we think this is a ones in a few year type of measures that will be selected in regards to you know the comments about walking and the point values i'll state that we believe that every measure actually on the measure improves the walking conditions every walker vehicle miles reduces the crash exposure to people that are walking most vulnerable citizens and the transportation network so this policy again is about reducing the vehicle miles traveled and other things to improve the walking and but this is focused on the new development what we can do. >> thank you may i direct any questions to the speaker. >> yes. >> my concern that the point value system of 7 points

initiation to walking is one point you say you don't think that that option will be used very often because it is costly, however, when i look at how i think we should be setting policy we have a policy in place about dislocation with vision zero goals actually is that i think actually vision zero should be a policy that is considered while you're considering this point system and not only just to reduce the amount of what we call it the v m t actually we should be enkm other policies we've adopted and already working towards the goals we look at a shuttle system for example, 7 points and other 14 points out that's correct. >> 7 or 14 that's what it goes up to yeah. >> i think that is - i just question sort of the point

system and the value of those points and what it encourages and we put one point towards walking improvements and put 7 points toward a shuttle and have questions about the shuttle service quite frankly that puts more transportation on the students i'm concerned how that point system encourages people not to have cars and also aligns what the vision zero commitments. >> supervisor through the incident the vision zero is something that all staff and mta been one of the additional benefits from reducing the vehicle millions traveled the goal of this program to reduce bmt the

narrative we'll have all along and very data driven how effective each the measures are at reducing that so - that is the narrative we have taken and the approach we've taken other things the city is doing around vision zero that new development has to consider through environmental review around vision zero it is just the focus is on reducing the vehicle miles traveled. >> okay. thank you. >> anything else supervisor fewer did you have any followup. >> any main question i know your looking at reducing vehicle miles traveled but i just think doing a policy like this we should consider the other policies that we have in place and every policy we have should be working towards vision zero goal and so i just question not

why you added the shutter shuttle i'm questioning the value you place on the points that's my question thanks. >> thank you, supervisor kim. >> i had a different set of questions to add on to what supervisor fewer said i think so the intent of this policy to reduce the vehicle usage mode on the roads but having negotiated several policies in the district i can imagine if not a lot of points for requirement of a project that there maybe less incentive to negotiate vision zero pedestrian safety improvements i think that ddas are exempt from this policy we see with developers they have

multiple goals to achieve reducing vehicle miles on the road and reiterate the points that supervisor fewer made i think that is important to figure out how we balance all the goals that our city has around development to assure we're disincentivesing and achieving other goals reducing the number of vehicles on the road i have a question i'd like to have a member of planning come up i know that corey teague was in conversation with any office any questions were around the kworment mechanisms in place for the ordinance now the way i read the ordinance that was silent in terms of penalty that were put in place plus or minus tcertificate of

occupancy you want to make sure they're put in place before we issue a certificate of occupancy any questions are related to a after the opening of commercial space beyond the monitoring and have reporting and nooifrt the site what is the actual penalty if the property owner decided to remove parts of tdm in the future. >> thank you, supervisors corey smith on behalf of the housing coalition. corey teague we'll have a monitor plan for the site environmentalist reporting requirements to help to insure that all the features of the tdm plan stay in place that is a new components as you may know

typically our enforcement complaint based we open a case we research if if so a violation we go through the due diligence and if so a penalty phase that progress will remain during the monitoring and reporting process staff determined their tdm plan was out of compliance they'll for the property owner and if it was something that can be brought immediately into compliance that will be done if they're unable or unwillingly to bring into compliance we'll create an enforcement case and the process will unfold we essentially sends them the required violations and it from the abated the same penalty phase that exists right now for any other code enforcement issue

i can go both detail if you like. >> all code visions are equal they are assessed the same. >> we're capped how much we can charge as 200 and $50 a day for a code violation we can't go above but require the property owner in violation covers staff times additional fees on top of the penalty fees additional to that the city attorney can also assess civil penalties and take additional enforcement action outside of planning department to assure enforcement. >> so regardless of the scope of the violation how big, small whether missing bike rack or a shuttle bus. >> that's 200 and $50 a day

and that's the maximum in the codes. >> i see when you say max to the discretion of the planning department how much to charge up to $250 a day and zoning administrator can charge up to $250 a day. >> what's the assessment of the fees a timeline bye bye which we'll assess those fees that came up with some of the popos in the district three or four years later no fees were seated this is great to have this in place but not helpful if so not assessed the timeline there is a due process in terms of the property owners are noticed and have a chance to respond request a hearing for a case and the

zoning administrator issues a violation letter that kind of firms an opportunity for the property owner to appeal to the board of appeals when it is exhausted and the violation is final at that point the daily fees may started accruing i. >> i think i have official i understand this tdm policy will be under the umbrella of the overall policy scheme he look forward to working with place of business on that we called for a report and hearing on that thank you for answering any questions. >> sure. >> thank you, supervisor kim supervisor yee. >> thank you supervisor president breed my questions would be similar to supervisor fewers we want to

thank supervisor cohen for working on this legislation and that the concept of the tdm is something i really do support and make sense to go forward and develop the measures around this issue and- i've been staff has come to any office to explain the overall concept of the tdm to us and talked about a lot of those measures in terms of rattling them off i'm not comfortable with not figuring out how to weigh these things and so forth so today, if we are passing this i think what i'm understanding if we pass is this

concept that then basically the board of supervisors have no say so on what those measures are and how that is weighed and so forth i'm wondering if there is a way for the understanding what the measures are and how that is weighed either through a hearing before we vote on that or can we - can we ask that we approve the measures in the future when they are totally finalized can i ask there the board president to the city attorney gibner. >> mr. gibner. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. so the as you said supervisor yee the ordinance in its current

as the scheme is conceived the board adopt the tdm requirement and planning adopt the tdm standards the board could adopt the tdm standard itself that's not how this has been conceived and not how it is drafts the board can require that planning approves the standard and bring them to the board the board will adopt by ordinance a future ordinance if you want to make that amendment i would like to discuss it with planning how exactly that fits and how does that work and ask that we at least the board continue the item to later in the meeting and maybe continue it a week entirety. >> i know for any district

probable other district supervisors in their computes that care about this our balboa reservoir and when not in discussion the laguna honda boulevard and forest hill project and the 5 hundred more units, 4 hundred more units the issue of how do you deal with transportation demands have come up over and over and over and over one of the major topics we talk about development that is important for me to understand this so i can explain to any constituents what this is all means and if right now i don't you know i don't feel comfortable with the

fact this is the overall plan and do whatever you want with this. >> if i may other options the board can sorrow asking planning to present the hearing to the full board or to the land use committee on the current standards or come back to the board the ordinance requires reporting in a year and 4 years thereafter but frequent reporting at the outset or a report before planning considered any future changes to the tdm standard so the board can weigh in and, of course, at any time in the future the board can adopt a future ordinance that rise the theme and takes the authority to adopt the standards themselves.

>> oh, lots of options. >> i think personally i'll be happy to weigh in with the initial measures and i know that there will be adjustments going to be made as you know further down the road and that is something those will be minor relatively speaking i think they have so many measures right now i can't forgathom to amend the measures. >> thank you kneeing

supervisor cohen before we get to supervisor yee i'll call of planning i want to hear from them as well supervisor i want to start at the top in some of the things i've heard and comment on supervisor fewer just to assure her what we're dealing with is a living document and that will will be updated as new data comes in i want to note that dpw deducting came to the land use committee to support this particular item and said this program is important to the vision zero tool i think supervisor kim you had questions about that i also want to call out the department of health vision zero with sfmta and supervisor yee a couple of thoughts and call on planning and possibly mta to

speak but - the format the way we are formulating that policy is similar to construction of formula retail and the board does a framework and the planning does the standards as i think mrib mentioned want to acknowledge we could require via a hearing to get more information how planning come up with the measures and points so this they can explain the literature review and the data foundation those are the critical pieces i'm hearing concerns from any colleagues this initial piece of policy the initial one the planning had hearings on 3 hearings on the standards and frankly, we've

heard it twice in the land use committee with that, i want to bring up the planning department does mta want to speak next okay. we'll hear from planning first address supervisor yee's concerns. >> yes. >> supervisors wade senior planner through the incident so you - we've been trying to assign the points in the meow memo the first thing we identified transportation demand management measure and we had two criterias reduce the vehicle millions traveled and some data evidences literature becomes

research indicated it independent and two needed to be under the control of a project sponsor that is filing an application with the department there is a larger world of tdm mta larger manages that but this was about what we have legal authority to community-based organization on a developer and what we can monitor we started that with one hundred not hundreds but 50 or so narrowed that down to the measures in the options that are before you and then started assigning points based on that literature and data said we also based on outreach came up with invite measures with the tdm friendly and had 3 hearings at the planning commission and 3 at the land use committee we are more than happy to dive

into the wheeze about the technical details and we envision that might come up and for future planners besides the document we have a document not adopted boutique justification for how we develop the memo and how we assign the points that cites numerous studies and kind of the day to day work we did to develop the memo that's how we got do o to where we are and creating a program that is responsive enough to update over time that's why the way the ordinance was structured to reference to the planning commission so we have the ability to be nimble we don't anticipate as substantial changes over time in terms of

the vast majority of memo items but may find new measures and find out that new measures are not effective we'll assign that to the planning commission and have the ability to approve that mta if you want to say anything. >> thank you wade through the chair victor i want to step back and address vision zero appreciate supervisor fewer you bringing that up we're committed to that policy the point value that is assigned is really data driven about reducing vehicle miles traveled one of the tools we have in vision zero to reduce the frequency of collisions in a way if you think about it globally retail use the vehicle miles traveled it what it is about it is complimentary to the other policies we're doing to make

sure the city achieves the vision zero and not reflect we don't value walking in the city so the point values is a reflection of the reduction of vehicle miles travel globally the more vehicles we reduce traveled fewer incidents and fewer opportunities with collision with pedestrians or anyone else holistically the reduction of vehicles traveled supports the vision zero policy the department of health as supervisor cohen mentions was in support of this program overall the program really aims to not only by the way, not only the vision zero goals but the reduction - >> carly one comment in response to other policies in

the city that we have and hold dear as city agencies a number of measures support other city policies but the way for instance, points more affordable housing points more affordable housing onsite not because of affordable housing policies they're allocated and others as well so we've tried to stay focused on the primary goal of the program reducing the driving and doing so i think been helpful not only to provide the signals of how effective different measures are but also we've had a number of different interests come to us and want more points for their measures

or their measures in the memo there is not data to support so staying true to the concept of demonstrated our best practices and reducing the vehicle miles traveled helped us to make that program. >> supervisor cohen any other comments. >> supervisor yee. >> supervisor cohen thank you for your suggestion i think rather than holed up everything i know that people have been working diligently on that and i appreciate there are measures that give credit for family-friendly housing pieces in here. >> childcare. >> and give that - i'd like

to have a hearing to dive dive into the weeds and feedback on the board that you'll take it seriously i'm going to have to trust you'll take it seriously otherwise say we should pass the measures if you can accept that i will ask for a hearing even though it has been heard in land use u land use but this is in the weeds do i need to ask for a hearing i'll ask for a hearing for the measures of the tdm. >> thank you supervisor yee and seeing no other names on the roster, we're done with the conversation it looks like unless any other - nope

supervisor safai. >> just really quick commend supervisor cohen add me as a co-sponsor. >> thank you. >> and madam clerk on the item as amended please call roll. >> supervisor farrell supervisor fewer supervisor kim supervisor peskin supervisor ronen supervisor safai supervisor sheehy supervisor tang supervisor yee commissioner london breed o supervisor breed supervisor cohen there are 12 i's. >> the ordinance as amended passes unanimously on the first reading as next. >> for the subdivisions to require a design important a tentative partial map for services activities to each

parcel and firmer the ceqa determination. >> supervisor farrell. >> thank you supervisor president breed as the internet has evolved as is 21st century offender power and water i introduce this towards the future when a new bring us on the residential and commercial see they can support the video and communication services for residents and businesses for the next century so the policy is straightforward our local law has no sub divide to parcels within a new subdivisions that implements the state provision that adds in the reminded within a new subdivisions the snaungs from a cost and labor perspective is minute all and in most cases will raise the property value with the importance of the communicates services and certainly going

forward i want to make sure we introduce 24 to put san francisco if a breeder good place going forward i think that is golf course that the owner adds this in the illustrate subdivisions codes for the first time in the history we're taking a step to codify those illustrates as they are thank you, john the city attorney and the development and land use committee for the positive recommendation and my staff in particular hope to have our support. >> thank you and seeing no other names on the roster, colleagues, same house, same call? without objection the ordinance passes unanimously on first reading so amend chapter four 1 for the hotel conversion. >> supervisor peskin. >> thank you, madam president and colleagues with the update to chapter four 1 of our

administrative code or the hotel conversion ordinance as commonly called we're taking a historic step to preserve one of the our most precious source of affordable housing stoke in san francisco as well as to strengthen the tenant protections thank you, my co-sponsors supervisor jane kim and supervisor safai and supervisor jeff sheehy and is supervisor hillary ronen in the order of our co-sponsorship for your support and humbling ask for all of your support today that legislation seeks to protect our incredibly valuable sro heretofore that has house the low wage and immigrant families and seniors disability residents and artists and musicians and at least in north beach the beloved neighborhood eccentrics after a wave of sro

demolitions that swept not only san francisco but cities across the united states in the 19 san jose and 1980s and the 1990s san francisco in the late 19 san jose passed a moratorium on the conversion of sro rental units to tourist units or demolition ♪ 1981 reuben, junius & rose can tells you but adopted chapter 41 of the administrative code that regulated the way those unites are reinstated as well as the way they can be converted and during that time as a matter of fact if you read chapter four 1 of the administrative code the recitals talk about in the 19 san jose north of 33 thousands of those units today less than

20 thousand a hair more than 19 thousand that laws was updated in 1940s a quarter of a century ago and needs to be brought both is the dawn of the 15 today, i want to thank the many, many individuals and organizations that have been involved first and foremost thank the department of building inspection and specifically rosemary bosque our housing inspections at dbi as is here and her staff is the endorser of this legislation now since it's inception this update to chapter four 1 does the following things that stops the practice of short term leasing the residential rooms in sros and updates the perpetrates and conversion fees

and strengthens the hotel forgive requirements monitoring and overall enforcement housing of dbi many things in the legislation larger untouched with the seasonal benefits to lease out tourists use rooms during the high tourist season if their vacated and finally one non-substantive addition today to the hotel requirements to include a floor plan with the various residential and tourist designations clearly delineated on the map and those are very simple changes on page 9 at line or page 8 at line 25 to insert in the last line along with a graphic floor plan per floor

reflecting the designations and at package 9 starting at the line 9 insert the graphic floor plan on file with the department of building inspection, and finally on page 14 at line 10 insert including the graphic floor plan at beginning of line 10 these amendments have been reviewed by deputy city attorney rob i want to thank deputy city attorney rob for his work and specifically my staff sony for her many months of work on that came after the previous board that half of us or two-thirds served on that put a intern moratorium in place while we updated chapter four 1 and specifically thank the sro collaborative's admission and central city and the aids

housing alliance the human rights committee and soma and united local 2 the tenants union and the many individuals including individuals who i've heard from the hotel operators and he owners and if i can ask all the supporters of this to stand up i want to thank you all very, very much for your support as this was formulated >> (clapping.) >> ms. boskey is here and is available for questions and with that, i will cede the floor. >> thank you supervisor peskin supervisor safai. >> thank you first and foremost supervisor peskin and his staff for putting forward this important legislation that is in times like those i enjoy

put putting often any city hat as you said chapter four 1 is dedicated to the history of this affordable housing it can't be lost how in many ways san francisco is the leader for the nation because we have for sight in the early 80s, noticing to protect this housing all over the country they allow this housing to be demolished or transformed into the other forms of housing this type of housing that houses our null arrived guns or disabled many if not for this housing would not be living in san francisco. >> and so we should be honored we're moving forward aggressively we need to protect

the vulnerable i'm proud to be a sponsor i'll add in those times with the extensiveness of this city and the most vulnerable to prioritize them 0 is thank you, again supervisor peskin. >> thank you. >> (clapping.) >> and supervisor ronen i also want to thank supervisor peskin and his staff for taking the lead on this important legislation and proud to be a co-sponsor i represent the mission district which is home to about 2000 sros unit and one of the neighborhoods with the highest rates of tenants displacement it is critical we preserve one of the last rhyming stock of homes available to low income people sros shelters the immigrants and seniors and documented and undocumented and people that are. >> leaned the revisions

proposed are long overdue and will protect low income housing if conversion recently, i received mostly supportive comments i want to remark but say some remarks about an e-mail owe received actually a threat from the general manager of hole trap can that is an hotel in the mission he threatened he'll stop renting 3 to 8 sro hotel rooms to women that give birthday or recently gave birth that didn't work probably unintentional he is illustrating with his threat

why this ordinance is so desperately needed i want to insure the homeless prenatal and the department of homelessness to find replacements for women both to give birth and he led the general manager of the hotel tropican tropicana. >> i'm reminded the foegz in the chambers clapping is not allowed. >> thank you, madam president today i'll be voting in support of this important ordinance and thank you supervisor peskin so for bringing this forward i can't think of anything more important than protecting the

sro stock i've sensitive to their needs many of those folks live in the hotels and make good faith to provide good descents housing for the vulnerable resident the operators the implementation of them and pledge to work with supervisor peskin the rest of any colleagues and the owners and operators to make sure that ordinance is workable for all thank you. >> thank you supervisor yee. >> i just want to thank supervisor peskin for this important piece of legislation it is something that means a lot to me. >> you know in the san jose, 60s, san jose he should say noticing and lie, san jose he

work with a lot of families in chinatown or north beach town and most of them live in sros not the best environment for families if not for that they wouldn't be here as supervisor safai mentioned then my brother came over from china in the 60s and 70's he know first hand the value of those units they're not the best conditions necessarily sometimes people trags transitional piece

and some long term but we can't keep on losing those units that is a vital part of housing stock in san francisco so thank you. can i be a co-sponsor. >> thank you supervisor yee. >> supervisor yee. >> thank you supervisor yee and seeing no other names on the roster, - supervisor peskin. >> i have an amendment i made i don't know if it was seconded. >> seconded by supervisor ronen colleagues without objection, without objection the amendments passes nauchlz and on the item as amended colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? without objection the ordinances passed unanimously on the first reading congratulations, everyone. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> all right.

madam clerk let's go to the next item >> item 4 it through 45 madam president. >> yes. please ass and those comprise the person's interested in the adopted midst negative declaration under ceqa for the promotion project on market street, items 43, 44, 45 are the motions associated with that appeal. >> colleagues he understand the appellants are withdrawn the appeal recommended to the negative declaration for 950 through 974 market street can i entertain a motion to adopt items 43 and table 44 and 45? move forward by supervisor sheehy - i got that seconded by supervisor tang is there any public comment on this particular item next year please come forward

>> hello supervisors my name is bryan the director of the key foundation here in san francisco and here to represent the appellants t gi p and the saint james and thank you supervisor jane kim for your leadership through this sometimes difficult process we've been able to create a compton transgender cultural district the first transgender legal district in the world that as profound profound accomplishment i thank everyone for your support and thank you to joel for engaging in this process with us and thank you for your gift to mitigate those historic resources because of you it is happening and really a profound

profound thing and look forward to working with the neighbors as as thirty odd something resident of the district i'm happy we are taking the first steps in starting conversations about to e how to preserve the disenfranchised group our groups don't have resources to own and control property didn't mean our mists are not important i look forward to our ongoing dialogue how we can respect all of us so on behalf of the appellants we hereby withdraw our appeal and support the project on 950 market street. >> thank you very much. next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors what a historic and powerful day for residential hotel tenants we're seeing two measures back to back that that concludes my presentation. to the residential hotel tenants

to see the hotel conversion updates is to moving to see all of you recognize the needs for stronger protection but also to see this project 950 market street is another residential strength some of the tenants are worked with the developers over one and a half years to find a way to move forward that benefits the tenderloin communities that represents the low income tenants and really assures that any potential harms were mitigated we are here 0 continue to support this project because of a benefit with the support of supervisor kim's and with group i support and long hours and dozens of meeting by residential unit hotels $300,000 secured for job developments for tenderloin resident to make sure to get union jobs at the hotel

we have money secured more affordable housing just two blocks away at rates for the tenderloin residents can afford and making sure that the in front line will be trained in deesclation and mental health and sensitivity so those are aspects of is an agreements we've not seen and historic citywide we're proud of the work the tenants did and appreciate the support from the st. joseph's and thank you for group i hope this can be a model for further benefit and partnerships between developers and the communities and thank you so much for the tenants that committed hundreds of hours and continue to work hard to make sure the project works well, for the neighborhood. >> thank you and. >> next speaker, please. >> jordan davis we want to say briefly owe do support like the

as a condition the establishment the transgender district that is necessary pioneering - it's been back to back as a transgender we've come a long way woman i want you in my court just for clarity the members of the public that is specifically public comment on this particular hearing so not general public comment. >> thank you. >> my name is maria a community planner in the tenderloin and i also here representing the tenderloin development without displacement initiative and we just want to let supervisors know that we are happy with the

sro protection that supervisor peskin and all of have voted on today, we also are very happy to support 950 market street and on behalf of the tndc we're happy those two things went forward so we can help us mitigate the displacements of low income people and especially people of color that live in low income communities thank you. >> any other members of the public that would like to specifically speak on this particular appeal we plan to table? seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor kim >> thank you supervisor president breed we want to thank autopsy i autumn the communities members that are involved in that lengthy progress in accounting one of the what will be one of the major development projects on the mid block cord

many of them spoke today conversations around the 900 block of market street began my first on the board of supervisors along with the mayor's office there was a strong interest what will go on a block vacant for many many, many years it took several years to get to a project proposal or p pa there was strong interest in grouping a number of vacant building together to develop this project on site but we also knew that was a very sensitive location the 900 block of market street at the is z of market street and downtown and shopping retail areas as well as is tenderloin and 6th street the tenderloin is a refuge for so many people in san francisco i say often either the first

neighborhood that you land in or the last for so many reasons and the tenderloin has been a neighborhood and you see this when you walk through the streets a place a refuge for immigrants for the lgbt and reeflgz and formally homelessness and long term san franciscans that can't afford neighborhoods and sick and struggling the tenderloin accepts everyone and concrete and very valid concerns what a major development means for a neighborhood it is empowered area like union square our hotel and the van ness corridor it was a long process thank you group i for taking on that

controversial site and working on a proposal with our office and community whether that be an art center sites or a different centered site and coming to the one that is before us today, i also really wanted to thank the community members for holding audible from a land use perspective how we impact the neighborhoods when we put in a development the sro collaborative and the key foundation in particular stepped up to say you know if we're going to support this development which we have concern for those are some of the things we want to see as we grow our neighborhood great to have hotel and market-rate apartments but make sure that our residents have train to get the jobs in the hotel that is being built our community heard out the

interests of having art on site and the developer moved in a partnership with the magic theatre he look forward to working with the magic theatre and their programming includes did t lgbt community and the sro residents and oats boys and girls club and the development center amongst many others i want to recognize this is the first development that comments to a land dedication on one 80 jones a parking lot that builds step up housing for sros resident this is a long ongoing conversation when i campaigned in 2010 two or three issues i

consistently heard from tenderloin residents one get us a grocery store i'm sorry about that but you came up with the gardens and that's been amazing, two roommate bodecker park make it safe a victory that has happened and that park is an oasis a step up housing for sro residents that will have been living in single-room occupancies hotels and ready to move on to affordable housing so this housing will create approximately 60 units of step up you housing for sores sores residents that currently have no more to go restricted by their income pay their rents on time but give back to the

neighborhood so this deal will i'll be introducing $18 million to the tenderloin neighborhood and finally understanding that there are real mitigation impacts to a neighborhood and community that has long been known to be in particular a transgender non-gender conforming neighborhood when other neighborhoods were kicking the members of t out of lgbt it is the tenderloin those members come to underground bars and shows and cafeteria to the sro hotels and we need to recognize there had been impacts from market-rate development on the historic resources and so this contribution from our developer to the city to assure we can plan a historic district as well

community serving center and retail space so we're employing our folks in the community and having active engaged and living resources not just a historic district but a living district i think is credibly important and so many of the concerns that came up through the appeal was assuring we were mitigating the loss of historic resources to the t lgbt and what i'm most looking forward from the city is working with the planning department the mayor's office of housing, mayor's office of economic workforce development to really examine what the resources are how to examine their value in the future this will not be the last project we're looking at this issue and moving forward not just preserve the history of the community and hour their interwoolen but make sure it stays alive i said this

earlier i love that san francisco is a sanctuary city we're proud wear a sanctuary city for the refugees and immigrants and t lgbt community it didn't matter for a sanctuary city if none can afford to be here and if none has safe spaces and community centers that serve us this is an important step assuring we're not just staying a sanctuary city but welcome everyone in the tenderloin has always been is epic center of welcoming everyone i see that thank you to everyone for your work a complex and long process for everybody and want to appreciate everyone's willingness to work through tough and complicate issues and issues we're facing for the very fit so i know the appellant have

withdrawn their appeal given that you had good conversations how to mitigate some of the impacts to the neighborhood and so colleagues now that public comment is closed. i'm going to make a motion - sorry. >> to. >> supervisor kim we already made the motion it was seconded before i opened up to public comment i apologize. i forgot who made the motion. >> supervisor sheehy wants to make some comments. >> i'll keep that brief salute the district again commend the obviously superb leadership of supervisor kim that was challenging to work through this win, win, win for

everyone is a fantastic outcome so thank you, supervisor kim. >> all right. this is there is a motion that has been seconded on the motion to - to approve - i'm sorry item 43 and table. >> table item 44 and 45 oh, supervisor kim. >> i'm so, so sorry one last thing i forgot to actually thank the specific individuals and organizations want to recognize the 950 market coalition and alexander goldman and jackie and mike the coalition and (calling names)

the staff of the mayor's office of housing and department of real estate and planning and oewd staff and the city attorney and, of course, the project sponsor and finally want to recognize april and bobby lopez for playing the awesome intermediatey role for all steps the process. >> thank you seeing no other names on the roster, madam clerk please call roll. >> on the most to approve 43 and table 44 and 45 and supervisor farrell supervisor fewer supervisor kim supervisor peskin supervisor ronen supervisor safai supervisor sheehy is supervisor

tang supervisor breed supervisor cohen there are 11 i's. >> the motion that item passes unanimously congratulations once again all right. madam clerk what is up next. >> the introduction of new business. >> all right. role for introduction. >> supervisor farrell is first up. >> thank you, madam clerk so colleagues, i have submitted a few items already i want to take a moment to address something that is on our minds we've been working on the past few days that is president trumps muslim ban that has been impacted over the weekends i was at the airport on sunday i know the vast majority of us were there

it was inspiring and humbling and scary i admire the enthusiasm was incredible and throughout the country was president trump is doing is deplorable attempting to blow up the torch of the status of liberty that is a beacon of hope inform so many people from my recipients from ireland like i said time and time again, our city is born of immigrants and it is simply who we are and in attempting to ban people based on their religious beliefs is complete bull i don't care if our cardiac or muslim or judiciously are buddhist didn't matter by our constitution and

hunt everyone is equal under our constitution in the united states and this is really hit home in many ways we are all have immigrant families aced supervisor safai knows many of my closet and dearest childhood friends including any best friends or of iran descents to see side affect on their families and not an individual everyone has people directly affected it is sad and it hits home so hard and what is happening is so unbelievable i'm proud to be here with you because as our board of supervisors and many of us have done press conferences and introduced things our mayor and city attorney we're standing

united as a board of supervisors i'm proud to be with you and continue to be united with you that considers that man to be our president donald trump. >> thank you supervisor farrell. >> supervisor fewer. >> yes. thank you in the last week seen horrendous attacks on people muslim and woman and more communities have been revealing from the executive order the one million dollars of supplemental fund pays for nonprofit legal services will provide legal services in the community it is understood as anti cabinet administration ramps up their activities more and more of the residents will be detained and unfortunately, we're not currently providing the scale of resources for the guns our city

takes a stands for as a sanctuary city we heard that loud and clear from the mayor and xhvn from the colleagues in order to think about how to provide legal services i requested the office of budget analyst to prepare a report on the program development of immigrants legal services from an municipality outside of san francisco and our you squanderers i have sponsored a supplemental given the moment for legal funding to the growing population of people who are detained i'm in discussion with the mayor's office of housing about the supplemental and will think reaching out to any colleagues on this issue i supported sponsored a source of funding for other services like rental subsidies for homeless and working with supervisor peskin office to schedule the

appropriation to be heard at the beven and hopefully, we can make right the council and due process and protect our neighborhoods against hate and discrimination mar mentioned financing for misrepresent family buildings of 5 toe 25 through the small site program this thing funding will stable i's the buildings with low income people that are susceptible we passed prop c that provide one and $5 million to low interest loans for organizations to buy at risk properties in san francisco with more than 3 units once purchased broke out up to code and made permanently housing any district in the richmond is amongst the

highest hit by no-fault evictions and seen the most loss of affordable housing units we have development that on a large-scale projects it is critical to say a healthy and functional acquisition program to stand the tide of avalos and develop our neighborhoods permanently housing stock to this ended i'm asking a hearing for the mayor's office of housing and the community-based organizations that that make this program work on the state of the program to bring the affordable housing like the richmond that lack affordable housing options thank you >> thank you supervisor fewer. >> supervisor kim. >> i'll do add the item we

discussed and proud to introduce a historic legislation that will create the first transcenter t gi l lgbt known as is compton district funded by a compton t lgbt fund by the developer project on 950 market in and of itself to be a living breathing expression to our t lgbt community in particular to the transgenders non-conforming the tenderloin past and presents not only a commemoration of events as that caused the cafe riot that predated stonewall but a partnering with our office to assure we can integrate affordable housing and economic opportunities and retail by being a hub