in trying to better understand what's happening, i've had many conversations who -- with elected leaders in emoryville, in the smaller cities that makeup the larger alameda county, and there's a diverse perspective. i think one thipg that is uniform that is everyone values the exercise, and i value the exercise, so my question to my staff at dem is how can we as the fiscal sponsors extrapolate the vendor portion of -- of -- of the exercise? how can we exercise more oversight and influence and ensuring that there are none xenophobic, racist, islamophobic sexist comments

written in the scenarios. do you want to comment? [ inaudible ] >> -- with the department of emergency management. well, you have my word, i will consult with my executive director as soon as she returns from d.c. >>supervisor cohen: well, to be fair, you gave me your word that you were going to work with supervisor yee, and you didn't do that. >> we have met with him several times, and we have a differing dialogue, to be fair, but i will work with the director, cronenberg, and i'm sure it's a conversation she will have with the other community members and sheriff ahern, absolutely. >>supervisor cohen: at this time, i'd like to ask the assistant sheriff of alameda county to come up. i just wanted to give you an opportunity to give some feedback on some of the remarks you heard here today, going a little further than the two minutes that you had in public

comment, and i assume out of the representatives, i am the most senior. >> yes, ma'am, i am. do you mind if i grab my notes. >>supervisor cohen: grab your notes. i'll just continue talking until you get back to the podium. thank you for being here, because i think the short coming of this conversation is you guys have not been here at the table in san francisco, so thank you, and i appreciate you being here. >> and i appreciate those comments, and in the future, i will make sure that there are people here from alameda county to address any questions. if i could start by saying, i know that there's been some comments that urban shield has evolved over the years. it started out as a police exercise and has evolved into an emergency management exercise. we have heard the concerns of the community over the years, we have heard the concerns of some of our elected officials, and we have made changes as a result of that. we had a significant amount of community involvement.

we've always had citizen and community volunteers with urban shield, however, you heard we had neighborhood response team exercises, we had the gray command, very successful. heard the issue about the oath keepers. we don't have interaction with them. they requested to come at the last minute. had we known that there was a perception that they were an extremist group, they would not have been allowed to be there. those were not used to identify suspects. there were many wearing those, at what i believe to be the incident in question. they were strictly being used as a protective measure. many people here in the united states of america now wear those when they're in certain environments to protect those

in sun. >>supervisor cohen: with you we're in alameda county. we don't have strong one. we can discuss climate change, but the reality is it doesn't enhance the exercise in any way. you see how it makes you look bad? >> yes, ma'am. i do tunds. i just want to make it clear that we were not using it to identify suspects, and we do not use them to identify suspects in any kind of incident or anything like that. there were about 70 vendors there primarily targeting an audience of police and fire. out of those almost 70 vendors, there were five of them that did have firearms displayed. they're not sold on the premtss, bpremt premtss -- premises. >>supervisor cohen: correct me if i'm wrong, to the point, there's other trade shows and

other opportunities to evaluate new weapons. >> yes, that's correct. >>supervisor cohen: so it doesn't necessarily need to happen with this -- at this event. >> that's correct, and also you had mentioned the funding that comes from that, the funding that comes from that is utilized to pay for things that we cannot bill to the grant, for example, so the amount of funding that results from that is pretty small in the grant scheme of things, and i am planning on speaking to sheriff ahern about possible making some adjustments going forward with the vendor show. i have had some discussions with my staff regarding that this year, but i will be planning to have further discussions with the sheriff to see what his thoughts are on the matter. >>supervisor cohen: i would appreciate that because times are changing, and i know the sheriff is also up for reelection, i don't know if there's anyone that's running against him or not. >> not yet. >>supervisor cohen: but there is -- times are changing, and i

think that we would be -- we would be foolish not to acknowledge the change, and that we have to respond accordingly. you took an oath to protect and to serve, and that means everyone. and when i think about the all too numerous shooting occurrences that have happened, even in our state of california, when you think about a few weeks ago, north of san francisco, i mean, we need -- i do believe we need to be prepared. >> i -- and i couldn't agree more, ma'am. and just on that note, i would like to state that -- that the number of shootings, at least in the region, have declined significantly over the recent past, and not that that's attributed to urban shield, but just so you know, swat operations that take place, most swat operations are resolved in a safe manner without a use of force, and part of that is a result of the

equipment that's utilized at those incidents, if you will. years ago, swat operation was basically, you know, busting down a door and flooding into a house as fast as you possibly could to overwhelm the occupants. that's not the case anymore. now what swat teams typically do is they do surround and call outs. it's very methodical, and they try to bring out the people inside, and a lot of that equipment is utilized during urban shield. >>supervisor cohen: thank you. i appreciate your extra commentary. supervisor yee? >>supervisor yee: so, we just concluded that one can go to other shows and get the same information. that's one thing, and you just said that the show brings in some funding, but it's a small

piece of the funding. so why are we doing this, and if we're -- i guess from my point of view, if we value that we don't want our personnel to participate in shows where they're selling a bunch of weaponry and if they're not selling it there, they're raffling it off -- i hope next year, they don't raffle off a tank or something. but i guess the question is if this is a point of contention for many that's here, is it really worth the money that you get to do this or can it be made up in a way so that the controversial issues can go away so that you can actually have these exercises, that many people can see that there's some value in it? >> i think that is possible, and again, that's some of the

discussion that i've had with my staff this year that oversaw the vendor show this year. part of the reason -- the primary reason why we do it is again, there's things that we can't pay for with county funds or bill against the grants. for example, meals that are served at dinner at what we call the hot box. that gets paid for through money that's veefd from -- received from vendors, so it would result in a change of probably some of the things that we receive for some of the participants, but i think it's a discussion we should have yee ayee -- >>supervisor yee: one of the things you can do is there shouldn't be any vendors that's

going to display military weaponry. >>supervisor cohen: i appreciate it. we're going to move on and take up the issue that we have here, and i understand it's interesting. i would be offended if somebody came into my county and told me what to do with the money, but in order for us to continue to move forward, i think collectively, otherwise, we're going to have the same problems, we're going to have the problems, we're going to have the protests, we're going to have the unrest, and we have an opportunity to bridge a gap here. the department of emergency management is responsible for administering the grant fore the bay area uasi, ensuring that the grant funds are spend according to grant guidelines and ensuring that each of the bay area counties and cities that they may receive a portion of the grant funds, that they adhere to the grant and fifrk will guidelines cht i want to read into the record for those of you that don't know the summary budget as follows, because i think we need to

bring some clarity. equipment, equipment is approximately $6.3 million. planning is approximately $4.4 million. training is $1.8 million. exercise is what we -- line share of our conversation was about today is $1.8 million. organization is $6.8 million, and the management administration is $1.1 million, so this is still, in total, a significant amount of money. we're asking -- we're being asked to accept and then expend approximately $22.5 million from the federal department of homeland security, so this is not an insignificant amount of money and there are a lot of very concerned people that are paying attention. so supervisor yee or supervisor tang, i don't know if there's a motion that you'd like for us to begin to take on. let's start with item 18.

there was a series of amendments that were read into the record by supervisor yee. there were two in particular. the last two, further resolved clauses in the back. supervisor tang, i think you had -- are you able to support both or are you able to support one or none? >>supervisor tang: first, for item 18, i support all of his amendments. it was item 19. >>supervisor cohen: okay. fantastic. so -- by the way, i just want to acknowledge that public comment is closed. i'm not sure if i did that. so supervisor yee has read into the record his amendments. i'm happy to accept both of the amendments as well, supervisor, and we can take that without objection. >>supervisor yee: yes. >>supervisor cohen: okay. so as amended, we will accept i guess two additional further resolved clause. >> clerk: and that will be referred to the full board? >>supervisor cohen: that will be referred with a positive recommendation to the full board. thank you. item 19, there were three

amendments that were proposed, three additional whereas clauses to the mou, and let's take them one by one. okay. i'll read them. the first one, whereas the city and county of san francisco does not condone training that promotes militaryized training that promotes stroo types and focus on religious programs. we accept this without objection. next item you be for consideration is the second whereas clause that says whereas the city and county of san francisco are -- in incorporating or principles -- that is an amendment, supervisor tang? is that a yes or a no. >>supervisor tang: oh, no. >>supervisor cohen: okay. supervisor yee. we'll do a roll call vote on this particular amendment.

we'll start with supervisor tang. >> clerk: yes. tang, no. vice chair yee? >>supervisor yee: yes. >> clerk: yee, aye. chair cohen? >>supervisor cohen: no. >> clerk: cohen, no. the motion fails. >>supervisor cohen: the third and final whereas clause says whereas if uasi funding is used for programs that are incompatible with the values and goals the board of supervisors may consider legislation restricting participation in uasi in the future. we can do a roll call vote on that, as well. >> clerk: on that motion, supervisor tang? >>supervisor tang: no. >> clerk: tang, no. supervisor yee? >>supervisor yee: aye. >> clerk: yee, aye. chair cohen? >>supervisor cohen: no. >> clerk: cohen, no. the motion fails. >>supervisor cohen: all right.

we have one amendment in item 19 that has been accepted, and i'd like to make a motion to move this forward to the full board with a positive recommendation as amended. >> clerk: madam chair, i believe there's one more amendment to the dem to make the matter retroactive. >>supervisor cohen: that's correct. we can also take that with the final vote. >> clerk: yet. >>supervisor cohen: so we'll accept the amendment from dem as well as the one remaining amendment that supervisor yee introduced, and we can take this without objection. >> clerk: yes. the matter will be amended and forwarded to the board of supervisors with the full recommendation. >>supervisor cohen: all right. are there any other matters before this board? >> clerk: that concludes the agenda. >>supervisor cohen: all right. we're adjourned.

thank.

>> hi, i'm ryan a prlth letting project manager with the sfpuc working at the sfpuc is a fast-paced environment the puc is american people eye person so breath and depth allows us to

work on allows me to move across my career path. >> fill the roadway. >> our unique projects is the heritage puc water treatment long-term improvement plant it's one of the largest projects i've managed and supervised to be successful as a project manager you have to be hard working and self-motivated and being adaptable is important because the construction it is very fabulous that get me up in the morning you're going to be project solving and seeing the project go to me that's fun, i like coming to bayview.

>> a lot discussion how residents in san francisco are displaced how businesses are displaced and there's not as much discussion how many nonprofits are displaced i think a general concern in the arts community is the testimony loss of performance spaces and venues no renderings for establishes when our lease is up you have to deal with what the market bears in terms of of rent. >> nonprofits can't afford to operate here. >> my name is bill henry the executive director of aids passage l lp provides services for people with hispanics and aids and 9 advertising that fight for the clients in housing insurance and migration in the last two years we negotiated a lease that saw 0 rent more than

doubled. >> my name is ross the executive directors of current pulls for the last 10 years at 9 and mission we were known for the projection of sfwrath with taking art and moving both a experiment art our lease expired our rent went from 5 thousand dollars to $10,000 a most. >> and chad of the arts project pursue. >> the evolution of the orientation the focus on art education between children and patrol officer artist we offer a full range of rhythms and dance and theatre music theatre about in the last few years it is more and more difficult to find space for the program that we run. >> i'm the nonprofit manager for the mayor's office of

economic workforce development one of the reasons why the mayor has invested in nonprofit displacement is because of the challenge and because nonprofits often commute technical assistance to understand the negotiate for a commercial lease. >> snooechlz is rob the executive director and co-founder of at the crossroads we want to reach the disconnected young people not streets of san francisco for young adults are kicked out of the services our building was sold no 2015 they let us know they'll not renew our lease the last year's the city with the nonprofit displacement litigation program held over 75 nonprofits financial sanction and technical assistance. >> fortunate the city hesitate

set aside funds for businesses facing increased rent we believable to get some relief in the form of a grant that helped us to cover the increase in rent our rent had been around $40,000 a year now $87,000 taylor's dollars a year we got a grant that covered 22 thousands of that but and came to the minnesota street project in two people that development in the better streets plan project they saved us space for a nonprofit organization national anthem and turned out the northern california fund they accepted us into the real estate program to see if we could withstand the stress and after the program was in full swinging skinning they brought up the litigation fund and the grants were made we

applied for that we received a one thousand dollars granted and that grant allowed us to move in to the space to finish the space as we needed it to furniture is for classes the building opened on schedule on march 18, 2016 and by july we were teaching classed here. >> which we found out we were going to have to leave it was overwhelm didn't know anything about commercial real estate we suggested to a bunch of people to look at the nonprofits displacement mitigation program you have access to commercial real estate either city owned or city leased and a city lease space become available there is a $946,000 grant that is provided through the mayor's office of economic workforce development and that's going to

go towards boulder the space covers a little bit less than half the cost it is critical. >> the purpose of the organization trust to stabilize the arts in san francisco working with local agency i go like the northern california platoon fund that helped to establish documents of our long track record of stvent and working to find the right partner with the organization of our size and budget the opportunity with the purchase of property we're sitting in the former disposal house theatre that expired 5 to 10 years ago we get to operate under the old lease and not receive a rent increase for the next 5 to 7 years we'll renting $10,000 square feet for the next 5 to seven years we pay off the balance of the purpose of this and the cost of the renovation.

>> the loophole will that is unfortunate fortunate we have buy out a reserve our organization not reduce the services found a way to send some of the reserves to be able to continue the serves we know our clients need them we were able to get relief when was needed the most as we were fortunate to arrive that he location at the time, we did in that regard the city has been - we've had tremendous support from the mayor's office of economic workforce development and apg and helped to roommate the facade of the building and complete the renovation inside of the building without the sport support. >> our lease is for 5 years with a 5 year onyx by the city

has an 86 year lease that made that clear as long as we're doing the work we've been we should be able to stay there for decades and decades. >> the single most important thing we know that is that meaningful. >> it has been here 5 months and even better than that we could image. >> with the economic development have announced an initiative if ours is a nonprofit or know of a nonprofit looking for more resources they can go to the office of economic workforce development oewd.com slashing nonprofit and found out about the mayors nonprofit mitigation program and the sustainability initiative and find their information through technical assistance as much as how to get started with more

fundraising or the real estate assistance and they can find my contact and reach out to me through the circles of the city >> . [gavel] the meeting will come to order. this is november 30, 2017 regulr meeting of the commission. i am sandra lee fewer joined bye chair cynthia pollock on my rigd hillary ronen on my left. the clerk is alisa somera and ie to thank the staff at sfgovtv, t

dam clerk. >> clerk: please submit any doco the clerk. >> supervisor fewer: item two. >> clerk: approve of the lafco s from the november 9, 2017 specil meeting. >> supervisor fewer: do you commissioners have any changes e minutes? seeing no changes, we'll 0e7 thr public comment. any members of the public who wo comment on item 2? no? seeing no public speakers, publc comment is now closed. do yo i have a motion to approve minutes, please. we'd like commissioner -- commir ronen and seconded by commissior pollack. these are approved. >> clerk: item three aggregation activities report, a status updn the cleanpowersf program. >> i believe we have a brief stf presentation from the san franco

public utilities commission. >> [off mic] >> is this working now? yes. we went to our commission and gt authorization for moving forwarh those power contracts. that authorization would allow r general manager to execute the y

contracts with certain conditio. similarly, we are bringing an io the board of supervisors that wd allow us to move through the prt of supply process at a pace thas what the market requires. so that we can supply the progrd begin serving a new group of cus by july 1, 2018. the california public commissios before it issues regarding the r charge and dairches justment, te fee charges community choice agn customers to cover the above-mat costs that pg&e incurred on thef before they left. we'll see decisions there in de. then we'll come back to you andr own commission in the first quaf it 2018 with the results of tha.

we also have been active in a cn the retirement of the de diablor facilities. pg&e is proposing in that settio retire the plant which we suppot they're proposing to invest $1.n over the next six years in replt power and energy efficiency. for us, we think that means siny don't have customers to serve, e community choice aggregation coy is supplying customers, that mee pcia costs. we've been arguing at the galifc to stop that from happening. that will have an impact on ourd we expect a decision in early 2. with that, i'm happy to take any questions you may have. >> supervisor fewer: any questim

commissioner? >> just as a clarification, youd that you would begin serving new customers july 1, 2018? >> yes. >> that is our plan. >> not 2019? >> we're expecting to do two moe enrollments, one july 2018 and y 2019 and by then, everyone wille enrolled in cleanpowersf in sann francisco. >> i love this. >> are there any members of thec to comment on item three? >> thank you. jeff hoaltsman. i would speak to say if you hapo know any members of the board of supervisors getting the approvae authority to the sf puc, i knowe monetary value might be higher n usual, but it's in line with ota programs that don't have to gete authority from boards like thiss

the only way that the pra fram d move at business pace and make m program could move at business d make progress. >> thank you very much. >> eric brooks, our city and san francisco green party and califs for energy choice, i think i mie mentioned this in a previous he, but in january, legislation is o come forward again in sacramento privatize and regionalize the ca electricity grid. right now, the california electy grid is run by the cal iso whica california nonprofit. as soon as it becomes regionali, bircher hathaway which is a coay corporation will be the biggesta in that room and will - get conr

that. it will bring cheap coal in ande with community choice a moong or things. even worse, because it's a we l grid, that would pument the trud straition and regulatory commisn it charge of californian's elecy grid. i don't know if the interim exee officer can do this, but right n january, that bill was introduct year and it was a two-year billd fought it and stopped it last yy of us working on the state levee text is available and we knee lo staff to look at it right away e proactive about that so that ass that bill hits the legislature,e lafco can oppose it and encourae mayor to oppose the bill legisle

>> supervisor fewer: any other e public comment? seeing none, public action is c. madam clerk call the roll. but miss hill. >> in light of mr. brook's comms the puc following the regional f the grid and have you taken a pn on that? >> barbara hail assistant generl manager for power. the puc has been following thatd following it more through the ca municipal utilities associationr publicly-owned eu timent capaci. we are -- utility capacity. i don't think the city took a pn on the regionalization bill in t session. but it's on the table in terms f the issues that we expect as mrs

said to see come back and it wio through the legislative positios that the city takes. >> do you see that coming in tht two months? or would it be at a timeframe te could perhaps just direct staffi guess, to add on to an existingu said that the regional body of s was -- >> the regional body of publicld utilities. that's the california municipal utilities association. we're also members of the califa community choice association. and this -- just to give you moe information on this effort, we n oregionalization of the grid isf governor brown's pursuits. he sprung some change changes on

the last legislative session to accomplish this objective of hi. but for the fact that it came ld surprised folks, i think it -- e governor proposes something ands everyone it's a key priority oft usually has momentum and passes. this time it didn't i think lary because of the surprise factor. i think we'll see a more regular approach to regionalization wouy expectation in the next legislae session and san francisco will e opportunity to take positions os to arrive at a position and come that to the legislative. >> okay. i think my only request and char can weigh in on this is just, is taken at this time, which i thif

no action is taken at this timeh is premature, if a change occurt you would send just an alert, tn fyi to the chair. >> very good, we'll do that. >> thank you. madam clerk, item four. >> clerk: item four, the interim administrative officer's report. >> through the chair to the memf the commission angela calvillo. the budget of lafco is currentlg for the duties you're pursuing currently. i do not have a report. we've been working to get to the workshop and the detail around e workshop, otherwise, to be brieo not have a report at this time. >> supervisor fewer: thank you y much. now, are there any public speakt would like to comment on this i? >> jason [inaudible] private ci. i apologize for making this quik

comment. i realize that february of next, wore public seats come up. you might want to give instructn totion the administrative offico start the process for noticing d putting out notifications if thc seat. the clerk as office has the pros down. i'm looking at how this commisss made up could become an issue oo figure you can work with legal l because two commissioners cannot approve. in it body, you need three commissioners. there is discussion on how you'g to do that next step. i wanted to make sure you were g attention to that. it will could provide tricky mag of how you do appointments to tc seat. >> supervisor fewer: any other c comments in seeing none, publict is closed. item five.

>> clerk: item five is discussin lafco's strategic plan. >> i would like to express our o pamela miller for the local agey formation commission that agreee today to assist us in our stratc planning discussions. miss miller. >> thank you madam chair and mef the commission. pamela miller, the executive dir with cal lafco. i appreciate the opportunity ton in front of you and have the din earlier about strategic opportus for this particular lafco. and with your permission, i'd lo just summarize what it was thatu discussed in terms of ideas thae thrown ow out and opportunitiese

concerns. >> supervisor fewer: that's thee of the chair. >> do i have permission to use e flip charts as props? or should i just read from them. >> supervisor fewer: you can uss props. do you need any assistance? thank you. >> so your commission actually p with four initial items to delvr into for future focus of this commission. out of those four, you actuallya deeper dive in terms of conversn opportunities and concerns on tf them. the first topic was sea level ra result of climate change. the second was public/private partnership opportunities. the third was municipal banking.

the fourth that you chose to noe any further at least for purposf today's discussion was level ofg and navigation centers to solvee homelessness problem. with respect to the sea level re conversation, the opportunitiest this commission identified woult this would be a collaborative e. lots of public discussion regare existing plan. what are the effects of the neighborhood? your commission had indicated tt neighborhood flooding is a prob. so an opportunity to explore th. to perhaps look at and enhance a coordinated plan to the creatioa

sea level rise adaptation plan. your commission noted that thism is inevitable. so it will is time to plan and e for the disasters that will occa result of sea level rise. it will allow you an opportunitk at any current existing emergenn and recommend improvement. im-- improvement on those plans. some of the concerns that your commission talked about should s particular issue be undertaken s lafco is that there could be a r additional funding that there ae limited funds for this lafco. and so find ag finding additione

sources that are legal issues te mindful of and certainly your ll council is your guidance in tha. you would need to define a cleae of this study. this is a huge -- all of the tot you discuss are huge. defining a scope of your study g to be important for you. that there are existing processd ownership of those progresseses. it's incumbent upon this lafco e for yourself the value and the e that you bring as a partner to s conversation. so that was the discussion aroua level rise. the next topic for potential stt you discussed in more detail wae public/private partnership scem. the opportunities you identifiee

was that this would be an opporo review benefits to the city andy by getting at what is it that -s it that private entities can pum sorry, that is risk analysis. is the city and county getting e benefits that are appropriate is of the partnerships? also a risk analysis. how can a private ebb at thi eny and county at risk in terms of s partnership? to explore benefit packages negd by hospitals, to take a look ate private and for-profit transit s using the streets of the city. to look at financing, to look ag rights. this is an opportunity to shinet on the need to increase transpan

the formation of the partnershi. to gain insight into the depth d breath of the partnerships thatt today. and to -- for the lafco to be te city-wide watchdog and mechanist the appropriate governance of te partnership. the concerns that you talked abt relates to this particular issue similar to the ones for sea lev. you have limited funding. you have need to find revenue s. be mindful of legal issues. you have to define the scope an, there are existing processes and ownership. so being clear with yourself ang able to define the value of lafg a partner in these conversations going to be important as well an additional concern that was ide, and that is these existing proc, there is a private industry aspo

that that adds a different layef dimension for your consideratio. finally with respect to municipl banking, the opportunities thatu identify there was an opportunio develop and present a scope thas complimencliment ri and adds to- climent r -- yousee potential fr this. you said it allows a several iss under one umbrella and in us dig those, you identified them as c, affordable housing, local buildr cca, homelessness and fiberoptic broadband.

then, you talked about diversifk and focus. you had a belief this adds highn terms of adding to the intereste board as well as increasing dem. some of the concerns, again, ths sea level rise. mindful of legal issues. the need to define your scope, d to define your value as a partne mindful of all of those existing partnerships in the conversatiot may be going on. this is really a long term issu. you also indicated that for this particular project, or focus, ta high level of expert analysis we needed on the longer term. and you had conversation aroundg for that. there was also the concern idend

for a potential high resistancem real estate capital. those were the three major issut you identified and discussed ine bit more detail in terms of opportunities and concerns. and with that, i'll turn it bac- >> thank you miss miller. is there any comments from the commissioners? >> first, i wanted to thank misr so much for coming and helping s through this process to help ust could be potential work of the d i want to thank my fellow commis for engaging in this exercise we which is what i needed to get bk engaged in this body and excitet the work ahead of us. it worked, it happened and i'm g forward to working with you on e

potential, exciting future work. with that, of all the things the discussed in weighing both the opportunities and concerns and g through capacity and budget, i d suggest that we continue the wot we've been doing with cca, thatt a new work area and look into ap define thdefinethe work furthern francisco and work on and pursue of work for analyzing public pre partnerships. i think if we limit the body's , these are big topics. if we limit the scope of the pr- of the topics and limit the scon

further with the help of some st that we can bring on, i think id enough for the body to continueo innovate and add new work in the but narrow enough to focus and s moving on some work projects thn really add value to the city any of san francisco. if i can make that particular m, but i wanted to start the discu. >> supervisor fewer: let's havea discussion then open it to publc comment then entertain a motion. >> just to echo the commission's thoughts in thanking miss miller facilitating our workshop, i the sometimes need to see it on theo realize where there is synergy,o

realize what exciting work is af us. i think -- i want to echo commir ronen's thoughts on municipal bd expanding and continuing our won cleanpowersf. i'm excited about the public/pre partnership just exploring whate public/private partnerships aren the city and county of san frand understanding the scope of that. i think one thing i would mentid did mention it in the workshop t for the cca and public bank opt, those would be things that i dok that we have to make a motion on on because this body has voted e before. we would need to for the publice

sips of partnershipprivatepartne could begin work on all three. we would use the money from the. for cleanpowersf to begin a stuy similar to the next report and t could be something we could dirf to begin an rpf when staff is o. it seems like we could begin soe special reports as soon as we hf to scope everything out for us. >> supervisor fewer: thank you. i also wanted to echo the appren to miss miller for getting us o. i think we had a lot of discussd we were just kind of floating is over. it took really some of your expo come in and put it on paper, ano

organize it so we could see a py for lafco to work on these thin. thanks so much. and thank you to the california association of local agency forn commissions to give us this reso help us to do this. thank you so much. i would like to now call on memf the public that would like to cn item number five. >> thank you chair fewer and commissioners. jed holtsman. i support your involvement in c. i think that's important to getn francisco to where we need to be vis-a-vis greenhouse gases. the partnership issue could brin revenue. i think we're all expecting thae might find -- i shouldn't make assumptions, as a member of the, i think we'll find that these public/private partnerships dong

the full weight of benefits to . i think one dollar per renting b space comes to mind. this is great. this could bring money into they which we want. a general opportunity that i wao point out, i know that you're cd about duplicative cork, which yd be, but we have an odd situatioe one body with a fairly limited f staff does work of a city councd board of supervisors in some ca. i would argue that you have moro than most legislators. i this there is a way to shoalde work. because having been to many of r committee meetings after the fir sixth hour, the level of engaget

might start to dip. i think this is actually an oppy for a lot of synergy and supplementation. thank you very much. >> supervisor fewer: thank you. >> good afternoon, i think it i, commissioners, eric brooks san o green party and local grassroots organization in our city. i want to give a thumbs-up to wt commissioner ronen has put forw. i think what you've got crystalw is the issue of public bank, the of public/private partnerships r existing program clea cleanpowed all the other programs that we'e discussed like public broadbandt would be funded by a public ban. this is like what is the publice relationship. how do we get public funding tot more public and building stuff.

this is -- to me, that is what s all about, that kind of vision. so thumbs up. >> supervisor fewer: thank you. any more speakers from the publ? seeing none, i'll close public t now. [gavel] i want to thank the public for g out and participating in our wop and also reminding us how impors body is. your commitment to it body too,k helps us to boost our commitmeno lafco and the exist tense of la. i want3me to thank you very mu. commissioners, it look likes wee some options. i would like to ask commissioner pollack, i know -- pollock, you mentioned doing public outreache collecting some thoughts from te public. i am wondering if we made a decn today, wout