five. two on leland and three on the raymond side. what we also showed here, too, i think there was confusion about the landscaping. we have some areas where the lots are wider. we've plan to put landscaping to screen the buildings. you can see we're keeping the mid-block open space here. typical floor plans for the houses, 4 bedrooms on raymond. on leland, 3 and 4 bedrooms. i will go through them quickly. raymond street profile of the new buildings. there's existing buildings here. what you see, too, in our landscape elevation, this is the condition of the raymond cul-de-sac. our clients are taking on their own response to clear some of the trash that's being dumped out here. the church building is there. there's a 40-foot height difference between the cushion the corner from the leland area.

and these are the drawings showing you the context of the buildings. again, our landscape, as you can see, this end lot is much wider. this is approximately 35 feet and landscaping it, putting in a new fence, which is a willow, wood fence horizontally laid in there. this is a condition, like you see from visitation. this large tree in the center is on park property and that will remain. here's the church building. again, i think one of the concerns from the last planning commission meeting was a view from the park. this is a new landscape we're proposing. here's the fence, the willow wood fence mounted horizontally that we designed with our landscape architect. here's leland avenue street. and here's raymond avenue street. other views we generated -- this is a quick plan of the house on

a triangular lot on leland. this is the cul-de-sac as it is now. the area has been excavated, 598, 596. again, just the floorplan showing the relationship to the property line to the house with landscaping on the side of the house. again, the rendering. this is what it looks like from the street. we modlate where the buildings are going. the church sits on a 10-foot-high terrace. and that's why it's -- you have the steps here and the landscaping. again, our landscaping, again, on the street, as you can see, and i'm available to answer any questions that you might have.

>> president hillis: all right. thank you. we may. first, we'll take public comment in support of the project and opposed to the d.r. mr. smith? >> good afternoon, again, corey smith. obviously a little bit away from what we're typically going for or advocating for on an active basis. it's not park land. and it's sipping -- single-family homes. and specifically, the word is, families. it will be an opportunity for families live in san francisco. we want access to the park to be maintained and continue to be used by the community. we're speaking against the d.r. and want the project to move forward. thank you. >> president hillis: thank you. any additional public comment? seeing none, ms. martin, 2-minute rebuttal.

>> sorry. i have to get assembled. several years ago, the planning department held the eastern neighborhoods master planning process. originally vis valley was included, but dropped without notice or reason. we have suffered from piecemeal rulings that have been a problem. in the past, there's been a denial of master plan and allowed our neighborhood to be used for what the rest of the city doesn't want in affluent

neighborhood. our main concern is that the land not be built upon, particularly on the raymond side. if the land were to be sold, there is possible financing with the vis valley developers fee, which our organization initiated. malia cohen supports our efforts to save open space at the 590 leland site. there's been a slow reduction of the park. in the recent past, housing was build on private property adjacent to mclaren park, creating a fortress around the park. the easy access and visibility has been denied to our community. the city needs to adhere to the general plans. shadowing, public accessibility, and integrity has to be taken seriously the focus is on housing and much-needed amenities. planning should look at the entire vis valley neighborhood and think about creating a

healthy community in a high-needs neighborhood expecting 5,000 to 10,000 new units of housing in the near future, which, by the way, we promoted from the beginning. this project adds no value. it just diminishes our neighborhood. allowing it to go forward is shameful treatment of a community that has supported high-density housing that other neighborhoods reject. >> president hillis: thank you, ms. martin. project sponsor? 2-minute rebuttal. >> commissioners, just pack from my diagram here. as we pointed out, the pathway that many of the public has referred to is still intact right here. this is the pathway. some of the work has gone in here, but this is the pathway.

sorry. this is the pathway that many of us refer to. there are already tall trees that you saw here that's on the public property that casts shadow. we had discussions with malia cohen's office and their aide. and in all of our discussions, we were not aware of any positions taken by the office, but we kept them apprised of public concern. the housing, which is noted here, is when the lot -- the lots were never divided. the lots were actually combined for billing purposes to one lot and then resplit through a compliance letter so that the intention of urban development for this site is the continuation of single-family housing. it's the type of structuresable uses that is predominant in this neighborhood and we feel it's compatible and it adds to the neighborhood by adding more

housing. in this development, there's an opportunity for this site to be a buffer between the more established housing and the other housing and the park because of the landscaping and buffering that we propose on the site. we would like the opportunity to develop this property. we feel it's a good value project for an in-fill project, particularly for a site where the structure is unutilized and vacant right now. we've had numerous break-ins on the church and police reports where we've been asked to get vandals and vagrants out of the property. so it's been a problem for us to manage it and would like to develop it into single-family homes. >> president hillis: that closes this portion of the hearing. we'll open it up for commissioner comments and questions. >> commissioner melger: i'll start. so it's been a year since we saw

this presentation. and i'm wondering if i could ask the d.r. requester if there has been any progress made. i remember a year ago, you had talked about the conversations you had had with the parks folks about -- can you come up? thank you. this is, as you know, private property and we're limited as to what we can do, but you've had a year to have discussions. did you make any progress? >> in terms of rec and park, i have to be careful what i say. we have had discussions, but it's -- i'm not allowed to

reveal. i know it sounds strange, but i can't say. yes, we've had talks. and they've been -- there's been some support in rec and park and i think if you recall there was a vote to support aquisition of the site and one of the things holding it up is financing. and we could get the financing quite possibly through developer's fees. when we talked to supervisor cohen, i don't know how much it would cost. my concern is that it not be built on. we had to stop home depot. we had to get community planning going there. once you build, it's all over. we will never be able to do

anything at that space. it's not an enormous amount of money. i've been on transportation authority cac and different groups and $1 million or $2 million. it's a lot of money to me but in terms of the city, it's not that much. in terms of the value that will be added by this land to that open space is im measurable. and -- i don't have an answer. i know that the community does not want it. we have different groups. we work with kids. there as school right there. there's senior housing. i don't think that -- as jim mentioned, the land, where it comes in, it narrows down.

there's that -- there's two paths that are -- a sidewalk and a pathway, that are proposed to rec and park and dpw and, you know, the powers at be. >> commissioner melger: okay. thank you. my question was only about if you made any progress during this year. i have a question for the project sponsor, if that's okay. so when we heard this the last time, there was a lot of concerns from the neighborhood that were raised about the path going from raymond avenue cul-de-sac down to the community garden and i understand that there's no impingement from the project, but i remember that you had put up pictures of a very tall fence and, you know, i remember my worry being, well, so the kids are used to going down that concrete path right now a the at sort of left edge

of the top of the hill. and now you will make them go around? and i'm wondering if you put a big, tall fence how that will go. so you showed some pictures of a newly designed fence, but i didn't get a sense of it. can you show them again or if you have a better -- >> sure. i'm one of the sponsors. we've met many times with the d.r. requesters and in one of the earlier ones, they raised the question. we sat there eight hours, four hours one day, four hours another, not holidays. we didn't see a single student. there was a lot of suspect activity at the end of ray monday, if anything. we didn't see anybody in two different school days walk up

and down. there were a couple of people with dogs walking, excuse me, maybe in all that. there's a distinguish ed panel speaking against the item, but with every item, 293, you will see a lot of pictures that we took that show that almost none of the issues, if not all of them, are invalid. we're not blocking anything. most of the area, as it is, of our area, is already -- already has a structure on it. we're not taking anything from the park. i have a lot of pictures here showing you up a the garbage that's all over the place. >> commissioner melger: i understand. i wasn't questioning that stuff. i was asking about the fence, if it's been redesigned or if we can look at it. >> may i add something? we got an urgent call from rec and park asking us to meet them at the site. we get there, talk to them. they were concerned that we

would block the path. we show them everything. we talked. we asked if they had any interest. they said they had none, but maybe they don't know. i can't say. the only concern is that they were going to redevelop or do something with that path that goes sort of along visitation avenue, that we're not touching it, not putting anything on it. we have a slide showing 37 to 36 feet from our lot. there is no issues of soil. it's flat. it's full of garbage, but it's flat. that's what rec and park told us over a year ago when we met them there. they had tremendous concerns that we're going to destroy the path or do something. it's out of our private property. we're not touching anything. >> commissioner melger: thank you. my question was about the fence.

nothing else. [laughter] >> i have this problem with my wife, too. i don't answer her questions right away. let me pull that up real quickly. this fence. there's another image, too, let me get to that, right here, that shows a fence to the right of raymond right here. this fence. it's a willow wood fence. it's made so that you can see through it, so it's not a solid barrier. >> commissioner melger: all right. >> you can see the landscaping. it's more like a filter. >> commissioner melger: okay. thank you. that's better. >> president hillis: commissioner moore? can i ask a question on that same topic? behind that and adjacent to 590 between the city property and 589 raymond where you are showing that fence, what is the use of that land? >> that's a side yard for that house. >> president hillis: so it has a large side yard? >> correct. let me get to a site plan.

>> commissioner moore: which one are you referring to? >> president hillis: raymond avenue along the cul-de-sac. >> this is the 35-foot-wide that you saw with the rendering. this is a side yard to this house. and it's landscaped. >> president hillis: has there been any discussion about is that? it's a large side yard. it's nice for the property to have that side yard, but i'm wondering, is there any -- is there any way to somehow utilize that in a better way with no fence or remains an open easement between your development and the city property there? >> i -- well, i think what's important to note there is that the site is very steep in this area. it also drops off very quickly. it's not as flat in this area where the -- as it is out along where the trail is. so this is -- if you can see it,

there's a drop about 40 feet from this curb height to this curb height. >> president hillis: yeah. what is the drop from that curb height at the corner to the -- to where the building starts at 589? >> probably 4 or 5 feet. i think you see it here on this -- let me get to this image. you see here's the -- if you can see the dotted line, that's where the street is in front of the house and here's the high point of the triangular corner, okay? so there's a drop. it goes down from there. [please stand by]

>> the very large building is at the edge of the open space and the building is the maximized

single residential in comparison to what is adjoining to the south. and i'm wondering why you pushed that particular building against the property line. >> if i could have the image up on the screen, we have the site plan here that shows it might appear on the garage level plan where the building and stairs are against the property line, but as it goes back, this footprint steps back. this is at grade. commissioner:i am using the overall site plan which is a cumulative image of all pieces together that outlines the building footprint as coming all the way to the property edge. and i don't know if that has changed. >> the one that we submitted to the staff is this one where it actually steps back, and it's not against the property line. >> commissioner: for the

commission, i am referring to this drawing. dated 12-16-2017, so that's for today's packet. is the lead page and each of the five buildings with the building in question highlighted in yell yellow. >> that is 598 leland, correct? >> correct. that is the only one this sits aggressively on the property line. >> this is what was submitted to staff. >> commissioner: that is accurate to what is in the drawing set. if you look at the, i guess, it's hard because they're all labelled 590.

and the one package for 596 leland, you will see there is more detail provided. >> right. and this diagram, i think this is the pdf sent to the staff, it is part of the record. what we do notice sometimes is when we send the pdf to the staff and they go and print it, the clarity of the prints that come from the printing house aren't the same as we get in our office. but if you look at this one here, this is 598 leland that shows the footprint in sort of that orange color and then the landscaping that is against the property line and the fence is there. if the building is not intended to be against a triangular property line, it is intended to have landscaping and grade. >> commissioner: and i don't have the one you are referring to. i have a site plan similar to what you are showing, and i'd be happy to show you the copy here. >> sure. >> commissioner: i'm concerned

that one building makes the project look rather massive. i don't have anything -- the buildings otherwise are fine. they are large. they fit the neighborhood. it is definitely a kind of like developer-driven housing. and is not spec housing and the building that looks similar architecturally i think they are fine. it is just that they are very large. and because they are large and you have a very sensitive site on which they occur, there is a little bit of crowding at the edges. that would be the best way i would describe it. >> is there a way to -- that 598

lela leland, kind of the last jog of that property, could you eliminate that? >> i think we could work with staff to, how can i say, remove the love handles that you see on the side of the building. >> commissioner: right. the last 1/3. the last 1/3. >> yes. >> commissioner: if you look at your design. >> and kind of emulate the 25-food module already been expressed. >> commissioner: and the bedroom on the main floor and extra room on the top floor. i agree with that comment. i think that would be a good kind of effort. i don't think we're at a place, at least i'm not comfortable in a place to deny this project. it's private land. i get that the folks from the area have worked hard to maximize open space in the neighborhood, and thats a kind of been supportive of development in the neighborhood. and this is not a city-owned site. there doesn't seem to be any movement towards -- >> i think that suggest would create more massing relief

between the city property and the family house. >> yes. >> commissioner: commissioner moore? >> commissioner moore: since there is no reaction from park and rec, which i would have liked to have had to go through the larger ideas, hear their larger plan, and get a feel for what they think, i feel that what is really in front of us is five residential buildings which come forward as design on a large lot, subdivided into five individual lots. and that is basely cha it is. there's nothing wrong with the unit. i think the modification that we are talking about here at least aleaves some of my anxiety of the -- alleviates some of the anxiety on my part and the more flowing nature of the garden next to it. and that's where i am. >> commissioner: is that a

motion? do you want to adjust the 598 leland portion project to maintain that 25-foot, i think, width of the building throughout? >> and the module. >> commissioner: so you wouldn't bump it out at the last. >> correct, correct. >> second that if that is a motion. >> commissioner: it's a motion, yeah. >> president hillis: we have a motion and a second, jonas. >> if i understood that correctly, it's just the motion is to take dr and approve the project with the amendment that the 598 leland project maintain the 25-foot module to be consistent with the other properties. on that motion, commissioner fong. commissioner koppel. >> commissioner richards. commissioner president hillis, excuse me. >> thank you. that motion passes unanimously 5-0.

>> that is it, right. so meeting adjourned. thank you. >> self-planning works to preserve and enhance the city what kind hispanic the environment in a variety of ways

overhead plans to fwied other departments to open space and land use an urban design and a variety of other matters related to the physical urban environment planning projects include implementing code change or designing plaza or parks projects can be broad as proipd on overhead neighborhood planning effort typically include public involvement depending on the subject a new lot or effect or be active in the final process lots of people are troubled by they're moving loss of they're of what we preserve to be they're moving mid block or rear yard open space. >> one way to be involved attend a meeting to go it gives us and the neighbors to learn

and participate dribble in future improvements meetings often take the form of open houses or focus groups or other stinks that allows you or your neighbors to provide feedback and ask questions the best way to insure you'll be alerted the community meetings sign up for the notification on the website by signing up using you'll receive the notifications of existing request the specific neighborhood or project type if you're language is a disability accomodation please call us 72 hours before the event over the events staff will receive the input and publish the results on the website the notifications bans feedback from the public for example, the feedback you

provide may change how a street corridors looks at or the web policy the get started in planning for our neighborhood or learner more mr. the upcoming visit the plans and programs package of our we are talking about with our feedback and participation that is important to us not everyone takes this so be proud of taking a job. >> my name is heather i'm an society engineer start as an interim about the knowing that and after completed my certificates i received my professional engineering licenses and became a an social engineer i work on a chain of multi engineering we work on a

plan through conduct and take ownership and are involved from the beginning to the he said end i take a lot of pride. >> where you, you planning on uss this. >> at the top. >> at the top of interference. >> it's regarding i've been given more challenging projects working as a designer on smaller projects to tuvenl managing project i'm a huge go property of getting revolved in jerry, it is a field that month women don't know about the more educated they'll apply for college i love the professionals and the projects i work with its very - >> tenderloin is unique neighborhood where

geographically place in downtown san francisco and on every street corner have liquor store in the corner it stores pretty much every single block has a liquor store but there are impoverishes grocery stores i'm the co-coordinated of the healthy corner store collaboration close to 35 hundred residents 4 thousand are children the medium is about $23,000 a year so a low income neighborhood many new immigrants and many people on fixed incomes residents have it travel outside of their neighborhood to assess fruits and vegetables it can be come senator for seniors and hard to travel get on a bus to get an apple or a pear or like

tomatoes to fit into their meals my my name is ryan the co-coordinate for the tenderloin healthy store he coalition we work in the neighborhood trying to support small businesses and improving access to healthy produce in the tenderloin that is one of the most neighborhoods that didn't have access to a full service grocery store and we california together out of the meeting held in 2012 through the major development center the survey with the corners stores many stores do have access and some are bad quality and an overwhelming support from community members wanting to

utilities the service spas we decided to work with the small businesses as their role within the community and bringing more fresh produce produce cerebrothe neighborhood their compassionate about creating a healthy environment when we get into the work they rise up to leadership. >> the different stores and assessment and trying to get them to understand the value of having healthy foods at a reasonable price you can offer people fruits and vegetables and healthy produce they can't afford it not going to be able to allow it so that's why i want to get involved and we just make sure that there are alternatives to people can come into a store and not just see cookies and candies and potting chips and that kind

of thing hi, i'm cindy the director of the a preif you believe program it is so important about healthy retail in the low income community is how it brings that health and hope to the communities i worked in the tenderloin for 20 years the difference you walk out the door and there is a bright new list of fresh fruits and vegetables some place you know is safe and welcoming it makes. >> huge difference to the whole environment of the community what so important about retail environments in those neighborhoods it that sense of dignity and community safe way. >> this is why it is important

for the neighborhood we have families that needs healthy have a lot of families that live up here most of them fruits and vegetables so that's good as far been doing good. >> now that i had this this is really great for me, i, go and get fresh fruits and vegetables it is healthy being a diabetic you're not supposed to get carbons but getting extra food a all carbons not eating a lot of vegetables was bringing up my whether or not pressure once i got on the program everybody o everything i lost weight and my blood

pressure came down helped in so many different ways the most important piece to me when we start seeing the business owners engagement and their participation in the program but how proud to speak that is the most moving piece of this program yes economic and social benefits and so forth but the personal pride business owners talk about in the program is interesting and regarding starting to understand how they're part of the larger fabric of the community and this is just not the corner store they have influence over their community. >> it is an owner of this in the department of interior i see

the great impact usually that is like people having especially with a small family think liquor store sells alcohol traditional alcohol but when they see this their vision is changed it is a small grocery store for them so they more options not just beer and wine but healthy options good for the business and good for the community i wish to have moit. >> shop & dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challenges resident to do their shop & dine in the 49 within the 49 square miles of san francisco by supporting local services in

the neighborhood we help san francisco remain unique successful and vibrant so we're will you shop & dine in the 49 chinatown has to be one the best unique shopping areas in san francisco that is color fulfill and safe each vegetation and seafood and find everything in chinatown the walk shop in chinatown welcome to jason dessert i'm the fifth generation of candy in san francisco still that serves 2000 district in the chinatown in the past it was the tradition and my family was the royal chef in the pot pals that's why we learned this stuff and moved from here to have dragon candy i want people to know that is art

we will explain a walk and they can't walk in and out it is different techniques from stir frying to smoking to steaming and they do show of. >> beer a royalty for the age berry up to now not people know that especially the toughest they think this is - i really appreciate they love this art. >> from the cantonese to the hypomania and we have hot pots we have all of the cuisines of china in our chinatown you don't have to go far. >> small business is important to our neighborhood because if we really make a lot of people lives better more people get a job here not

just a big firm. >> you don't have to go anywhere else we have pocketed of great neighborhoods haul have all have their own uniqueness. >> san francisco has to a

>> (clapping.) >> in san francisco the medical examiner performs the function of investigating medical and legal that occurs with the city and county of san francisco from a variety of circumstances in san francisco there is approximately 5 thousand deaths annually i'm christopher director for the chief mr. chairman the chief my best testimony a at the hall of justice on 870 drooint street that is dramatically updated and

not sufficient for the medical chairman facility i've charles program manager public works should a earthquake of a major are proportion occurs we'll not continue to perform the services or otherwise inhabit the building before the earthquake. >> we're in a facility that was designs for a department that functions and in the mid 60s and friends scientific has significantly changed we've had significant problems with storage capacity for evidence items of property and also personal protective if you're doing a job on a daily basis current little storage for prirjs are frirnlsz we're in an aging facility the total project cost forever ever commercial is $65 million the funding was

brought by a vote of go bond approved by the voters and the locations is in the neighborhood the awarded contract in 2013 and the i'm the executive director we broke ground in november 2015 and that started with the demolition of existing facility we moved into the foundation and january so pile foundation and then with second construction of the new facility. >> one of the ways that we keep our project on time on budget and we're having quality to have regular meeting and the variety of meetings with construction process meeting as well as cost of control meeting and i'm a project manager for public works the office of chief

commercial we want walk the project site when we sign up and also with a contractor insinuates for a change over we need to verify what or what was instead of. >> the building is 42 feet tall so it is two stories and 46 thousand square feet roughly we're that's a great question to be on time and budget have the roof complete a the exterior moving with the site work. >> and as you can see we've got a lot of the interior finishes installed. >> in an effort of an differentiate the facility that designed to work for 72 hours. >> not taking into account there was a lot of structural updates made into this building not seen in other construction throughout san francisco or other barriers we have friday morning examiners from 8 to one public comment monday to friday

because of air circulation we literally have to shut the doors and so the autopsy is done without staffing being able to come and go or exit the space and literally lock down the autopsy in the new facility we have bio build one door opens and closed behind you you can gown up and go through a second seizures of doors that has its own independent air supply and now in the exterior opt space having that middle space have greater flexibility of staff as they move in and out of the area. >> in the current facility investigative unit has small tiny, tiny place in the area of the new facility is almost

doubled in all divisions from the current facility and the new facility. >> the planning we have here gives them the opportunity to have the pool needs to complete theirs jobs in a much more streamlined fashion. >> we're looking forward to have secured parking to minimize the egress of you know visiting and the members of the public but really to minimize the investigators remaining remains from our advancing and so the facility. >> we have a new visitors area we're building that is a little bit more friendly to families. >> one thing you may notice in the room no windows there is no natural light not good for most autopsy but in the new facility at new hall we made that an

objective they want to insure we were able to look up in the middle of exam and see the sky and see natural lights. >> that's one of the things the architect did to draw in as much light as possible. >> we have staff here onsite we insure the design of the new design enables the investigators and other investigators skiefksz to consider to house on site this meant we needed to design and plan for locker room facilities and shower rooms the ability to sleep. >> third of the construction going into the building has been by contributions of small businesses. >> part of the project is also inclusive to the sidewalk have all new sidewalks and new curve cuts and landscaping around the

building we'll have a syrup in front of the building and rain guardian. >> the medical examiner's office has been a several if in their contributions of the understanding the exception and needs. >> it's a building that the chief medical examiner has been looking forward to quite a few of the. >> it is extremely valuable contribution to the, neighborhood address san francisco as a whole. >> the building will allow is to have greater very much and serve the city and county of san francisco and the neighboring >> look at that beautiful jellyfish. the way to speak to students and

motivate them to take action, to save the planet, they do, they care and my job is to speak to them in a way that they can understand that touches their heart and makes them feel powerful with simple actions to take every day. ♪ ♪ >> i was born and raised in the desert of palm springs, california. my dad was the rabbi in the community there. what i got from watching my father on stage talking to the community was learning how to be in the public. and learning how to do public speaking and i remember the first time i got up to give my first school assembly, i felt my dad over my shoulder saying pause for drama, deliver your

words. when i was a kid, i wanted to be a teacher. and then when i got into high school, i decided i wanted to get into advertising and do graphic art and taglines and stuff like that. by the time i was in college, i decided i wanted to be a decorator. but as i did more work, i realized working my way up meant a lot of physical labor. i only had so much energy to work with for the rest of my life and i could use that energy towards making a lot of money, helping someone else make a lot of money or doing something meaningful. i found the nonprofit working to save the rainforest was looking for volunteers. i went, volunteered and my life changed. suddenly everything i was doing had meaning. stuffing envelopes had meaning, faxing out requests had meaning. i eventually moved up to san

francisco to work out of the office here, given a lot of assembly through los angeles county and then came up here and doing assemblies to kids about rainforest. one of my jobs was to teach about recycle, teaching students to reduce, reuse, recycle and compost, i'm teaching them they have the power, and that motivates them. it was satisfying for me to work with for the department of environment to create a message that gets to the heart of the issue. the san francisco department of environment is the only agency that has a full time educational team, we go into the schools to help teach children how to protect nature and the environment. we realized we needed animal mascot to spark excitement with the students.

the city during the gold rush days, the phoenix became part of the city feel and i love the symbolism of the phoenix, about transformation and the message that the theme of the phoenix provides, we all have the power to transform our world for the better. we have to provide teachers with curriculum online, our curriculum is in two different languages and whether it's lesson plans or student fact sheets, teachers can use them and we've had great feedback. we have helped public and private schools in san francisco increase their waste use and students are working hard to sort waste at the end of the lunch and understand the power of reusing, reducing, recycling and composting.

>> great job. >> i've been with the department for 15 years and an environmental educator for more than 23 years and i'm grateful for the work that i get to do, especially on behalf of the city and county of san francisco. i try to use my voice as intentionally as possible to suppo support, i think of my grandmother who had a positive attitude and looked at things positively. try to do that as well in my work and with my words to be an uplifting force for myself and others. think of entering the job force as a treasure hunt. you can only go to your next clue and more will be revealed. follow your instincts, listen to your gut, follow your heart, do what makes you happy and pragmatic and see where it takes you and get to the next place.

trust if you want to do good in this world, that >> good morning. today is wednesday, january 17, 2018. regular meeting of the building inspection commission. i would like to remind everyone to turn off all electronic devices. first item is roll call. president mccarthy. [roll call taken] we have a quorum, and the next item is president's announcements. >> good morning. and welcome,