amended, mr. schenn, does that mean we need to pass it and then send it back to the ethics commission for clarity? mr. schenn, just for clarity, so at this time, the goal was to pass -- to take the vote on the amended legislation and then to kick it back over to the ethics commission. >> now in the hands of the ethics commission? >> president breed: i'm asking you just to clarify. >> up to you, do you want a motion to return it?

>> president breed: at this time, we are not going to vote to approve it, we need to forward this item to the ethics commission for review and hopefully approval. so can i take that motion? moved by supervisor tang, seconded by supervisor cohen, can we take that without objection? without objection, the item is in your hands. >> thank you, madame president.

i would like to summarize the amendments that have been discussed so we can all be clear on what the ordinance contains at this point. commissioner cop, >> thank you, madame chair. i recommend that the commission consider the now broadly amended version at its april meeting. i would not vote for such version tonight. after i have an opportunity to

read a final product, and not a summary from the city from our staff. i will be prepared to consider voting for it. >> thank you, commissioner cop. your suggestion is to continue the item until our next regularly scheduled commission meeting. and that would give the city attorney an opportunity to work with staff and the board of supervisors to make sure that the ordinance we're considering incorporates all the changes that we just discussed. please stand by.

>> yes. madam chair, as i had advised you, that i believe i'm unavailable for the regularly scheduled meeting on the 20th of april, and i would ask if you could check to find another date before that date when we could have the meeting because i'm prepared to vote for this -- this ordinance. >> we do have a may 7th meeting, but that's further out from our april 20th meeting. i would like to ask madam executive director, is there a possibility of continuing it to the call of the chair to a special

and i do so for the following reasons: much of the body of legislation that is being debated this evening was introduced by this supervisor almost two years ago and has languished in front of your commission. much of the amendments that have been discussed this evening were introduced by supervisor kim almost a year ago and languished in front of your commission. i believe with actual desire by you, not for nefarious or malicious purposes, but because the president of your commission who quit in a huff, had a vision of making a grand change. and rather than actually taking the amendments and the reforms that these supervisors

introduced one by one, you decided you were going to have a huge package, which you could not internally agree on. i cou you could not internally agree on giving one of your members by giving the courtesy of a vote, that on this body happens by common courtesy every single meet. it is frankly embarrassing. the notion that you could not find a room in city hall, we will help you find a room in city hall, miss pelham. president breed will do, that myself, supervisor peskin will do that. the clerk will help you do that. we will help you find a room. this was supposed to be done long ago so it could be in place for the june election. it was not our fault that your president quit. it was not our fault that one of your members was out of the

country for the vast majority of the month of march. hence our meeting today, april the 3rd. i would like for the vesecond time to ask commissioner kopp to reconsider. okay. chair to commissioner kopp? >> the supervisor appears to ask me to just vote irrespective of my beliefs. that is a serious expectation, which unfortunately through the chair, supervisor peskin, i cannot honor. >> okay. oh, supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: one last statement, madam president, and to my colleagues on the board of supervisors and to the four members of the ethics commission. this was setup by whatever genius who's sitting here in the audience as an iterative

process. as it should be, this requires a super majority vote, four out of five members of an ethics commission, one of whom is appointed by the board of supervisors, one by the city attorney, one by our assessor, one by our district attorney, one by -- who are you appointed by, yvonne? the mayor? there you go. so this is a multiheaded hiatra. it requires eight out 11 members of the board of supervisors. it requires an iterative process. and of course i am not asking you to abandon your principles, judge kopp, but i am allowing you to allow this iterative process to continue to work. that is the spirit i dropped

process 15158. i'm asking you to not forget your principles, but to allow us to continue to collaborate together going forward. i will, one last time, reiterate my request, your honor. >> supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: thank you. just a point of clarification through the chairs, if the commissioners were to vote on the package that we send them, isn't it so that that needs then to sit for 30 days, any way? and then secondly, wouldn't there be an opportunity during that time for all the commissioners to review that package, and if they had additional issues, they could make additional amendments at that time and send them back to us if they were substantive?

so in effect, what i'm saying is if the supervisors were to vote on this, there is still opportunity for the ethics commissioners to make changes before and after that 30-day period, is that correct, or not? can someone answer that question? >> mr. hsu. >> so let me see if i can try to answer your question. during this evening, i tried to flag which amendments would be substantive or require a continuance. the only one that was in that category was commissioner kopp's proposal, which failed. the vast amendments that have been considered on the floor and have been adopted by the commission have not been substantive. if there were a meeting of the minds for those bodies, then we would be done. >> supervisor safai: so

through the chair, just point of clarification, if the commissioners were to approve what we had just approved, is there still an opportunity after tonight if they wanted to amend that, or is it done? >> i mean, it's a -- through the president to supervisor safai, i mean, i guess there are all sorts of permanent permutations out there. >> supervisor safai: i guess what i'm saying is, if the commissioners were to vote and approve after we've just done this now, they are going to have a regularly scheduled meeting. at that regularly scheduled meeting, they could make the decision to rescind their vote at that time, make additional amendments and send it back to this body, or they could make the decision to take no action and just approve what they approved tonight? >> yeah. it's certainly possible. it's certainly up to the

commission. >> supervisor safai: so i guess i would just add onto what supervisor peskin has just said. since we've gone through this iterative process, judge kopp, you want to have the opportunity to review that. it sounds like what the city attorney just said to us, you still have the opportunity to review that, you still have the opportunity to change your mind, if you were to schedule this in front of your commission at your next regularly scheduled meeting, and then you could make a final decision at that time. would you consider that, please? >> commissioner kopp? >> commissioner kopp: through the chair, who are we kidding? this isn't going to be applicable to the june 5th election? the best chance we had is it might have been applicable to the november whatever it is election, but that's gone out

the window because it isn't going to take effect until january 1, 2019. who are we kidding? there have been some common sensical comments made about scheduling the meeting, and madam chair woman, i would suggest that the executive director can inform us within the next 24 hours of what's available. commissioner renne won't be at the april 20th meeting, as he has stated, for good cause. that would mean no action until may. let's get an alternative date before april 20th, madam chair woman, and meet then. and at that time, we will be fully informed with as to what the heck was happened here, and why all of a sudden, it's hurry up and vote this out of these

chambers. >> president breed >> thank you, commissioner kopp. i would like to say on behalf of myself, we absolutely are wanting to collaborate and work together to craft this legislation. i think our presence here today is really he have denevidence that i respect my fellow commissioners' requests to take the time to review the ordinance as has been amended, you know, both by us and by you, and it's been a long day, and would like to ask my executive director to please, with all due speed, determine a date prior to april 20th, and would ask all of your help in making the wheels of city hall turn a little faster so that we can find a room that could be televised so that we can take this up and bring it to a really successful conclusion i

think that we're all waiting for, and the city and people of san francisco are waiting for, as well. so i would like to move forward with putting it to the call of the chair, and that we will take this up at the next meeting of the commission as soon as can be practically scheduled. is there a second? >> is there a second? can -- can you call the vote,

please? [ roll call. ] >> clerk: am i correct with three votes of the commission, and with a majority, the vote passes. >> okay. this hearing has been held and is now filed, and would you like to adjourn your meeting, if you -- unless you have other business? >> we have other business. the ethics commission will continue, so for purposes of completing the business today of the ethics commission, we will now recess and recon conveniereconvene on the actions, the commission will reconvene in city hall room 264. >> okay. so the ethics commission will continue its meeting in another

room to finish up its business. here at the board of supervisors, madam clerk, is there any further business before us today? >> clerk: yes, madam president. >> supervisor peskin: can i just make a motion to table item 42. >> we have a motion to take item 42. >> president breed: okay. motion to table item 42, madam clerk, do we have any further busines business. >> clerk: yet. we have item number 43, which should be forwarded to the ethics commission. >> is there a motion to forward item 43 to ethics commission, made by kim, seconded by tang, so we will forward item 43 to

the ethics commission. is there any further business before us tonight? >> clerk: that concludes the calendar. >> president breed: we are adjourned.

>> good evening, to part two of the san francisco ethics commission joint meeting with the board of supervisors. like to call item number 4, public comment for items appearing or not appearing on the agenda. >> hello again, commissioners, san francisco human services network. it's late, i will be brief. i would like to express sincere

appreciation for tonight's hearing and for your thoughtful consideration and open mindedness -- can't say it, it's so late. open mindedness to the many amendments that have been suggested and we look forward to continuing that conversation as this process continues and i am feeling much more optimistic about the passage of this significant reform legislation in a way that will be helpful and will achieve the real goals to stop undue influence but with a balance that takes into account the needs of the general public, including non-profits and donors that it may affect. so, thank you. >> thank you. >> no more public comment. >> adjourn. >> second. >> all in favor? we are adjourned.

>> the office of controllers whistle blower program is how city employees and recipient sound the alarm an fraud address wait in city government charitable complaints results in investigation that improves the efficiency of city government that. >> you can below the what if anything, by assess though the club program website arrest call 4147 or 311 and stating you wishing to file and complaint point controller's office

the charitable program also accepts complaints by e-mail or 0 folk you can file a complaint or provide contact information seen by whistle blower investigates some examples of issues to be recorded to the whistle blower program face of misuse of city government money equipment supplies or materials exposure activities by city clez deficiencies the quality and delivery of city government services waste and inefficient government practices when you submit a complaint to the charitable online complaint form you'll receive a unique tracking number that inturgz to detector or determine in investigators need additional information by law the city

employee that provide information to the whistle blower program are protected and an employer may not retaliate against an employee that is a whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittal employees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle blower protections please seek www.

>> good morning and welcome to the treasure island mobility management agency. my name is jane kim and i am joined by commissioner yee and ronen. commissioner yee is the vice chair of the committee. i want to recognize our clerk alberto alberto quintanilla. i would like to take a moment to acknowledge charles and mya hernandez at sfgov tv for broadcasting the meetings and making sure they are available to the public. mr. clerk, please call the roll call. >> commissioner kim, present. and ronen is present. commissioner yee. >> yee present. we have quorum. >> thank you. would you please call items two and three together. >> items two and three are the consent agenda and items are routine. staff is not planning to present on the items but are prepared if desire. if a member objects, any of the

items may be remoouvend considered separately. >> thank you very much. so are that there any questions our comments from colleagues? not colleagues from colleagues. seeing none, we will open for public comment on these two items. seeing no public comment, these items have closed. >> we need a motion and second. >> and motion to approve the minutes. >> do we have a motion? we have a motion and we have -- >> a second. >> can we do that objection? >> we need to do roll. >> roll call on items two and throe. >> con the consent agenda -- on the consent agenda, commissioner kim. >> aye. >> a commissioner ronen. >> aye. >> a commissioner yee? >> we have approval. >> great. so we will move forward with item two and three. can we please call item number three. >> item four? >> i'm sorry, four. >> item four, recommend amending the developmented fiscal year 2017-18 budget. this is an action item.

>> thank you. and rachel hyatt is here to present on this item. >> good morning. the overall development program had a launch date for occupancy of new homes in early 2020, january 2020. that has since shifted 18 months into mid 2021. so accordingly our work program for the year has also shifted. we're moving a number of activities that we expected to start and really get underway this year into next year, so we don't get ahead of ourselves. the work that we are doing this year which we need to advance this year is in the planning

area. there's policy areas especially on the affordability program side that we're working on and working with the bay area toll authority on reconciling policies with them. we are working on the transit path which you will see a presentation on today. but the work in the engineering part of the program so the civil design and the systems design, the software design, that's work we originally anticipated starting and really getting understoodway this year. there was some pretty heavy lifting from engineering support associated with that that we built into this year's budget. we are now proposing to shift that work, not going the launch that work until next fiscal year. so accordingly what you see in the budget amendment is moving those costs and anticipated costs and the revenues over to next year. we will not lose those revenues, though. they're shifting out to next year. so the work that we built into this budget was going to be funded by a federal grant.

the advanced transportation -- technology for congestion management deployment grant. and that's matched by local tida funds one for one. so that's the source of funding. we still have it and four years to make use of that and we will. but not starting until next fiscal year. also on the funding side, i wanted to note it was great we worked with shari at one treasure island, formerly the treasure island homeless development initiative to submit a letter to the bay area management pilot trip reduction program for the on-off island shared van pool to operate. we will hear about that in may. so i described some of the work that we're continuing to do this year. we're working in these areas and that work still remains in the budget and will continue even into next fiscal year. so that's context for the budget amendment. and in your memo, you can read the specifics about this

starting on page 13. it is a decrease in expenditures mostly on the technical and professional services side, the engineering services side of $2 million. and that will be moved to next year and will be funded by the federal grant matched by local tida funds. >> question. >> commissioner yee? >> kind of get the decrease in the expenditures for the technical and professional services. can you explain a little bit more about the personnel? seems like you are either not fully staffed or i don't get that piece. >> right. that is right. so the the sfcta board adopted new organization, i think it was in december of 2017, and that included two positions associated with the timma work. the imthe tim program manager and a system manager. and we did expect that starting

this fiscal year as that major engineering work started that we would fill that position. we now don't expect to need to fill that position until next fiscal year. >> got it. >> what's the reason for the delay? >> on the development front, sure. bob, would you like to speak to that? bob beck with treasure island development authority. >> thank you. as rachel said, bob beck with the treasure island mobility management agency development authority. we had some delays in getting the final permit approvals and final maps for the initial sub phases of the development. i am pleased to report, though, that the developer treasure island community development has wrapped up that for ybi and on april 10, we expect the final subdivision map for w.b.i. to be at the board of supervisors. that releases the street

improvement permit and over the next year, there will be a lot of work on the horizontal infrastructure on the island so that the vertical development can start roughly a year from now. >> could you tell us a little bit more about the horizontal development and permits that are necessary before the vertical development begins? >> yeah. on the island, we will be constructing new water storage reservoirs to supply both treasure island and we will also be reconstructing mcculla road which is a main artery. we need to widen it and shift the alignment of it. and then there's also some other minor roads that will be constructed. as part of the development of both islands, we are building out entirely new utility infrastructure and many of the roadways are either being

replaced or significantly reb l rehabilita rehabilitated. >> are these permits that you seek proi marly through public -- proi marly through public works and the sfpct? >> and also involvement with the planning department, mayor's office of disability, and the fire department. >> do we have to do any work with the state on these permits? >> not on these permits, no. >> how is that process going? i always hear mixed reports from developers on working with our city departments, post entitlement. >> it has been challenging, but we -- there is a city wide effort to improve this process, and with issues the permits on the first y.b.i. and subphase on treasure island, the developer is shifting to start preparing the next subphase application which we expect to come in next fall, and hopefully we'll have learned a lot from these first

few maps as well as the process improvement that we won't see the same types of delays on the next sub space. >> how is the financing going for the infrastructure development? >> the ticd, the treasure island community development is self-financing the development and they have all the funds in place for this initial subphase of development. then as they start preparing parcels for development, some of those will be sold to continue to finance the subsequent phases of infrastructure. >> okay. thank you. >> sure, thank you. >> thank you. all right. so i think at this time we'll open up for public comment on this item. seeing none, public comment is now closed. colleagues, can we take a motion on this item? >> sure. i'll make a motion to approve

the adopted fiscal year budget for 2017-18. >> thank you. >> can we take that motion -- and that motion is seconded. can we take this without objection? and the motion passes. mr. clerk, please call item five. >> item five, update on the transit pass design, this is an information item. >> a hello, commissioners. i will be presenting the transit pass study. today i will go through

primarily on initial alternative recommendation and some other findings and next steps. and the first two i have already covered on the last committee meeting. so this is a map of the three modes that will be contributing treasure island to east bay and san francisco. here are the use cases that we studied for this transit pass. our five goals and objectives for this transit pass. and here is our top three alternative for transit pass with 10 alternatives and these are the top performing. first is treasure island access pass which will provide an access to all muni and a.c. transit and the ferry connect g ing treasure island to san francisco. and then there is transit cash which is a certain amount of value uploaded on to the clipper card an use it in any transit agency in the bay area. the last one we just added,

treasure island flex cash where a pass holder can buy any products such as a.c. retail transit pass and we added this at the request of one of the stakeholders who wanted to see how would this pass perform given our goals and objectives if we have s.f. muni and s.f. ferry pass. so we had an assumption in the future there would be a pass where it has all s.f.muni and ferry included in it. along with this, our goals and objective, we also conducted outreach in winter 2018. at this outreach, we had four focus groups. two with residents in this -- residents focus group had spanish and chinese translators. also the residents focus group represented treasure island demographic.

we had businesses focus group and san francisco tourism to understand the need of visitors and with developers to understand the need of future residents. we also presented at the tidal board and food pantry. during this focus group, we tries to understand what were the needs assessment as we are designing the affordability program. we ls a did a dot exercise where we -- we also did a dot exercise where we asked the participants which path would you prefer better. transit cash or access pas pass. i will show a result in a minute. so with our goals and objectives and our outreach, here is the complete list of the alternative analysis process. access pass has the most users included. it also has the most trip coverage compared to the other two during our fall outreach dot exercise about 90% of the participants preferred access pass due to simplify transfer

policy and people didn't have to think about which mode to choose since it is unlimeited. also, the benefit for access pass is unlimited product to choose whichever direction they want to go to. the drawback is an agency restriction. this pant is only for s.f. muni and the ferry line to and from san francisco. some of the benefits for the transit pass is the flexibility that you can use this anywhere in bay area, any transit agencies, but the drawback is there is a limited amount, so it is not unlimited travel. the benefit for flex cash is people can buy a retail product as they choose. and the drawback is it is not bidirectional since there is no retail product that includes

east bay and san francisco, so a user has to make a decision whether they want to travel most ly in san francisco or east bay. here is the initial recommendation. access pass for residents and worker, and transit pass for visitors in year 2025. now, i'll go a little bit more in detail of each of these two transit pass is unlimited travel on s.f. muni in year 2021, opening year, and at full build out will include the s.f. to treasure island water island service. the user group for it is one pass per household for market rate residents. that is mandatory. and for all the workers this will be an opt-in option so they can choose to either buy this

pass or not. it is not mandatory. >> when you say mandatory, with is it part of the rent fee or h.o.a. fee? >> yes. >> but what if they were a renter? >> it would probably be part of the rent free is included. >> how much is this group going to be. >> that is a large group of folks. >> for past cause, the interim value we are estimating and proposing between $95 to $115 which will be determined by a.c. transit fair which is not determined yet and for full buildout, it is not decided yet because there is fares to be made in 2025 and we'll come back again for a proposed fare price. the fare was estimated based on

customer value. we looked at other retail products and what modes are included in other retail products. one of the retail products is muni a-pass with bart and muni on it priced at $94, so ours will have a.c. transit and s.f.muni on it and that is why we proposed this. we did an and we did a financial sustainability to recover the fare rates, and with this range, it is possible to achieve that recovery. >> an i'm sorry, just to clarify, so the access pass, which could be on a clipper card or something like that, will access ferry, transit, and s.f. sms muni, but cash is only available on a.c. transit or muni?

>> if it is cash, it is anywhere. it is a clip we are certain value. you can use it for bart, s. s.f. muni or a.c. transit. >> what is not an option with just the unithe flex cash option which is retail product that people can buy. so either they have to buy it an muni product which is muni and pass or a-pass or her to into a.c. transit, so if it's a cash l va, why can't they use it on either? >> in that scenario, we are assuming it would be a retail product such as a pass. so would that option even be

allowed? >> the idea for it was to see how would an alternative perform with s.f. muni and the ferry service. >> wouldn't the clipper card be -- >> it is in clipper card. >> and muni, ferry, and a.c. transit. >> your questions is about the flex cash option. >> why would you include it if there is a cash option used on all the transit lines? >> so we did this in response to weida's request. they wanted something very specific, to see us look at something that would involve a retail pass that doesn't exist tod today, a retail pass that is a muni plus local ferry. the same thing as a muni plus

bart bart, the a-pass, except a ferry version of that. it would involve treasure island ferry, ferry to and from mission bay t local pier 41 ferry. and -- >> do you get a better price point? >> not necessarily. you just use a clipper card with cash on it to use on any operator. >> they are thinking about the benefit of this is that many people would take the ferry coming from their perspective, they thought this type of pass would draw more people to ferry. >> why? >> to bundle unlimited ferry with the muni pass. >> the flex cash is not really a cash system. it is a pass. >> what the way it would face the customer is the mandatory customers would be required to purchase something or either cash or retail product.

in their theorizing, they would choose the ferry -- >> doesn't the all access pass, isn't that unlimited? >> yes. >> we recommend it. it is simpler, it's including all the benefits. >> i would just take that option out. you're not recommending. sorry. skipping ahead to the end. >> just very confused why we event brought it up. okay. >> it is very confusing because when you say cash, it sounds like a per ride fee, which is what i do. i put cash on the clipper card because i don't ride it enough so it is a per ride fee. >> can i ask a background question as well? i never heard of a mandatory transit responsibility for renters or owner. has this been done anywhere else? i am courses you about it.

>> i believe that there will be a version of this with hunter's point to choose a cash value or a muni fast pass and is like a mandatory between the two options. >> this is included in the housing deed? in the development agreement. that is interesting. >> so that is exactly right, and bob can say a little bit more about the requirement in the development agreement, but the analogies elsewhere in the city and this is something that the city is really including as a development in the mayor and started with the hunter's point and is continuing in the major peer developments on the east side. >>ened a for the development of treasure island in particular, the transportation and transit challenges of being connected to

the bay bridge were significant hurdle to any development. and the mandatory transit pass was put into the development agreement. and will incorporate that into their homeowners association dues or rent as the case may be. >> thank you. we view it as a benefit for people because it's going to be a monthly pass that you have automatically and we help you get it and a unique benefit that provides access to all the modes that will be serving the area. we consider it as a benefit for

folks. >> you should be able to get a benefit from packaging it. one of the advantages is everybody pays into it so it's cheaper for everybody because they realize not everybody is going to use it, and i would assume that same concept will apply to this. >> that is definitely part of the anl si we found that -- analysis and we found there will be unused passes, but there is another, and there are two groups. it is optional. so they will be able to get to choose whether they want to buy it or not. the next part of it is we will also have an affordable version of this pass which all below

market rate resident households will be eligible for this pass if they want to buy it. the pass cost will be 50% less than market rate. if the market rate is $95, below market rate would be $48. for the distribution of the pass, timma will mirror the same process as they do with market rate resident. also to note here that m.t.b. completed the means-based fare study that recommended 50% off any retail pass product or one-way fare. it is up to each transit agency to implement this recommendation. it is very close to what we are recommending for timma, too. it is 50% off. if the below market residents qualify for a means-based fare product, they can choose between the timma or that product. both of the options would be available to them.

going through the implementation process of the pass, and starting in 2021 and the transit policy fair adoption in fy-2019. and the clipper implementation of this pass will take between 2019-2020. and timma's transit pass management of distributing the pass and the travel usage will take between fy-2020 and 2021. for ak desz pass in 2025, the to-do list is to make sure that a placeholder is in place to get updated as phase two is updated so our pass is easily implementable in year 2025. it will be in the clipper pass. the transit cash visitor pass is

another recommendation and is a mandatory product where per hotel room will receive a transit pass. the visitor pass will be launched with when the treasure island hotel is developed and that is expected to be year 2025. so the visitor will receive a daily cash value into their clipper card or any other mode and they will be able to use it anywhere in the bay area including from sfo to treasure island. the visitor pass pass is to be determined starting in 2025 and when the fares get set, we will get closer to the cash price. as we are going through the study, one alternative stood out and i wanted to inform the committee about this. it is monthly accumulator. accumulator is pay as you go structure until the user hits a certain and cost level or number of trips.

for example, if one had an accumulator and they will pay one-way fare up until 36 trips and then rest of the monthly trip will be included in that pass. the benefit of this pass is there is no up front payment. you can pay as you go and the portion of it if you are five trips away from earning the pass, you are more encouraged to take transit, but currently it is not possible in the clipper system because clipper card can only hold up until 10 trips, not 36 or higher amount. this is the capability that will be designed with clipper 2.0, but some of the other issues would be different transfer policies and one-way fare differences. we recommend that clipper executive board and clipper staff consider an accumulator structure when designing or updating the clipper program.

some of the other features would be beneficial to timma as clipper 2 is implemented and one is account base which will help us to do accumulator if we want it for timma. a smart foen application or -- a smartphone application or web portal to manage to see how people are traveling and using this pass. and if we are really meeting the needs of the pass holder. also be able to integrate with third party such as bike share, car pool, so people can have one seamless transit experience. and open payment will help with the fare integration so you can pay your payment or fare at one platform, not in different pieces. again, a kind of seamless experience of using transit modes. next step is we are preparing to share some of the findings in spring and summer outreach and

starting a multimodal integration concept as part of this study to look at some benefits for timma to integrate with a third integration and what it means to have the seamless experience. and we will release the report in summer or fall of 2018. thank you so much. questions? >> i actually have a question that is not directly related to your presentation. but it is sort of related. what is the projected maximum population that's going to be residing in on treasure island eventually? we are expected to have 8,000 unit uni units with the resident

population. >> and with the bart and potential second tube, but what the second tube, is there any consideration to maybe have a stop at treasure island? >> we appreciate the question. it is really early to say yes or no or preclude any option, but so far no one has suggested or highlighted that level of detail in the planning. it is very early, but i would say it is possible, but nobody is focused up that level. >> i guess my argument is if you want to have 20,000 people there, that is probably more people than some of the stops that we already have for part. >> fair point, thanks. >> all right. any other questions or comments? we will open for public comment.

seeing no public comment, public comment is now closed. i have been getting a ton of feedback on the mobility management program and the access pass program and there continues to be a lot of concerns for existing residents in particular the low income and are considered market rate and frankly don't make market rate wages. because this program is to many years away from the current date, i imagine that is why the public is not really coming out yet. but just as we continue to move forward, i think that we should really have some income or means programming with the market rate residents as well because market rate covers such a huge range of salaries. we'll see where we are as a city in a number of years, but i think that residents continue to

question and bring concerns to our office about what the future of the program is. but we have a lot of time. that being said, i think it's a very interesting program that we are putting together and really looking at innovating on how we pair transit and housing development together. and a little bit of news work to do to not overburden working class families as well. thank you very much for that. at this time, mr. clerk, can you call item six and seven. >> item six, introduction of new items, information item. item seven is public comment. >> is there introduction of any new items by commissioners? okay. item seven and we will open up public comment for item six and

seven as well. >> good morning, commissioner yee. the one kindness and one should take the right path of patriotism, wisdom, and great courage upon your missions. on behalf of the people apart from pains and difficulties of world tragedies, one must seek solutions for offering open help for our people. this must be the true way of economic development and lick prosperity of the the current good for our society to fight for justice and areas of injustice and inquality. one must work hard for the unity of the nation to show patriotism and righteousness. and even undergoing big challenges and difficulties, one should march forward along the path of your missions. one should tolerate one's mighty spirit for