are going to need independent expertise and kind of an independent style of action from your executive officer. so i would just express that i hope that those things will be sound in this individual and we look forward to working with him. thanks. >> supervisor fewer: thank you very much. seeing no other public comment, public comment is now closed. commissioners, do we have any comments among commissioners? seeing none. and in response to public comment, the -- the process and i think all the interview results will be public after, is that correct, mr. ing. >> correct, it'll be available after contract award. >> supervisor fewer: okay. thank you very much. so i'd like to make a motion to accept the panel's recommendation and direct the interim administrative officer to begin working on a contract.

colleagues, is there a second? okay. commissioner pollock has seconded. moved by commissioner fewer, seconded by commissioner pollock, without objections that we accept the panel's recommendation and direct the interim administrative officer to begin working on the contract. thank you very much. madam clerk, please call item number ten. >> clerk: item number ten is public comment. >> supervisor fewer: any members of the public like to speak during this time? seeing none, public comment is now closed. madam clerk, please read item number 11. >> clerk: item number 11 is future agenda items. >> supervisor fewer: this item is up for public comment. is there any public comment on this item? >> eric brooks again, san francisco green party and our party san francisco. just to amplify and reiterate because i had very little time to mention it, two things --

well, two things. one is that on sacramento lemgs lation, i would strongly ur lation, -- legislation, i would strongly urge you, chair fewer to have staff cue up for the next meeting an action item for potential legislation in sacramento so that by then -- by the beginning of next meeting, we will probably know what the problem bills are pretty clearly. we're already getting a sense of that, and we can send you e-mails before that and maybe hopefully staff at sfpuc and staff at other bodies will be able to contact you and say these are the problem bills, calcca. and that way, you will be able to take action next month before this stuff really starts flying through committees. so i'd really urge you to do that. i'd just like to amplify on the tetratech thing, so tetratech is a company that works for the

navy all over the country, has been caught falsifying date a toxic public cleanup. our organization went with an organization called clean action, i specifically asked them about treasure island and yerba buena island and said, well, tetratech also did the same kind of work out there. why aren't we also hearing that there's an investigation of that work? the response that we got from the epa was frankly a lie. they told me that it wasn't a -- that treasure island was not a superfund site. that's not true. it's just not on an active investigation list, so that's the kind of thing we're dealing with. and what i've seen last tuesday what was introduced to the board of supervisors, is only

specific parcels will be introduced for action and not comprehensively redoing -- [ inaudible ] >> supervisor fewer: thank you very much, mr. brooks. seeing no further public comment, public comment is now closed. are there any future agenda items to note, commissioners? seeing none, i'd like to mention that our next meeting is scheduled for may 18th. madam clerk, is there any more business before us today? >> clerk: that concludes our business for today. >> supervisor fewer: thank you very much. we are adjourned.