flects that.orturety i would encourage any large business in san francisco to g riouslyonvertin upgrading to the cleanpowersf service. it's good for the environment, it's good for business and it's good for the community. >> clerk: good afternoon. nd use committee meeting i'm katy tang. to my left, supervisor safai and i think we'll be joined by a

erica major. madam clerk, any announcements? >> clerk: please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices. any documents to be submitted in the file submitted to the clerk. they will be on the june 4 agenda unless otherwise stated. >> supervisor tang: let call item 1. >> clerk: to re-authorizing the section 210 concerning new production, distribution and repair space and development of new production and distribution and repair appropriate findings. >> supervisor tang: afterwards, we'll have planning staff after. chair, tang. and good afternoon. good afternoon toyou, as well, supervisor i. i'm andea cohen's office. and we're here to ask for your support for item 1, which supervisor legislation designed

to incentivize permanently affordable pdr space. it somhat l on-site affordable housing model. higherncome, mixed use office space offset the cost of intaining afforp.d.r. it's a narrow region and p.d.r. spaces across the city. if we don't build these spaces, they will cease to exist and we want to reserve as much p.d.r. space as we can. the legislation was -- this really is removing a sunset from a pilot program that was established in 2015. and it uses a cross-subsidaon model, with the ground p.d.r. and the other 2/3 w o spaces. no residential allow. the project sponsor must submit

a detailed business plan as specifying who the tenants will be, measures they're taking -- measures to ensure the building ak an effort to work p.d.r.ers with theco the on hiring workers from disadvantaged ackgros. i will invite planner diego sanchez up to give a few more technical details about how this would work. >> supervisor tang: great. thank you. and also in your presentation, you could maybe sure results of the legislation and the -- upon its expiration, i'm sure it's helped many projects in the community. if you could share if it had expired what we would be prevented from doing. >> diego sanchez, planning department staff. superviso supervisors, the planning department heard this may 3. several members of the public testified to show their support and how successful it's been at 100 hooper site. several commissioners remarked,

e e expressing their gratitude to supervisor cohen f establishing this and they voted unanimously to approve the ordinance. that's the report from planning commission. if you have further details, we can fill those in as well. thank you. >> supervisor tang: do we have any questions, commts? okay. seems like it's a good thing. so we'll good to public comment on item 1. any members of the public that wish to speak, please come on up. >> supervisors, katervsf maid and i will just answer directly as the project sponsor and now owner of 150 hooper, which is part of the 100 hooper campus. this legislation is really the only tool we have right nowo incentivize new construction. and very importantly, on sites that are basically empty. these are p.d.r. sites t t n ihing usable and this

is really addng densitynd making it possible for these kinds of projects topenc . 150hooper itself, which is a portion of the 100 hooper project wil bepe actual later this summer. it's four stories, 60,000 square feet of significantly below-market space it will house dozens of manufacturers with guaranteed more than 60% of their employee across the building being low-income at the time of hire. so it's been a resounding success and we're very excited to see more of these kinds of projects move forward. we hope you will consider supptitoday. thank you. >> supervisor tang: thank you very much. any other members that wish to comment on item 1? okay. yes? come on up. >> good afternoon, supervisors. thor sizloski, 1850 bryant project in the mission, a fitrouilding that we're building in the p.d.r. 1g

different hit. we're in support of this legislation we'd like to see if can be considered to include affordable housing as part of this. and also child care, understanding that to incentivize p.d.r. development in the city is to create public benefit as well, to allow things that create public benefit. if you can aofwce, which is something that will generate income for the project, which is a public benefit. so just wanted to submit that for your consideration. >> supervisor tang: thank you very much. any other members ohe public wish to comment on item 1? seeing none, public comment is now closed. we're joined by supervisor kim. can we have a motion on item 1? toen it to full board with otion positive recommendation. >> supervisor tang: we can do that without objection. so moved. thank you very much. madam clerk, item 2, please. >> clerk: item 2 a president ofhe navigation the continued

center located at1950 mission street through september 30, 2018, and the continued operation of navigation center located at 20 12th street through december 31, 2021. >> supervisor tang: thank you very much. and this is an item that is sponsored by the mayor's office and supervisor kim, i don't know if she wanted to make any opening remarks? do --okay. >> supervisor kim: thank you, colleagues.this su extenn of two of our first navigation centers at 1915 mission and at the civic center hotel. because the construction will ted, we're just ginally tici arilor extending 1915 mission until september 30 of this year and continue the operation of our civic center navigation center through december 31, 20 thi ensur as we're waiting for construction to begin, that

vacant sites are not being left unused and continuing to house people that live oour streets at the navigation center. as soon asstrucon is ready to go and ready to build the housing at 1915 mission, it will be 100% affordable hng for families and that the space will be available and we will have our other navigation centers, which are currently under construction, ready to open. we do he the department of homelessness and supportive services here as well. not sure if you want to make any comments. >> supervisor tang: with that, we'll bring up emily cohen. >> thank you, supervisors. superr ki said, this resolution before you will extend operations at the original 1950 mission street and civic center hotel. you all are quite familiar with what navigation centers are, so i w into much detail. the 1950 mission street navigation center opened in

march, 2015. it launched our building other centers. t's beenta solution to e meess. the development on site has been delayed until at least fall of this year. we're proposing to exten our operations there until the end of september, which will allow the replacement site to open in time, so guests that remain at that navigation center can transition and so that we don't have an ongoing, vacant pcel at 1950 mission. civic center hotel is a 93-room former hotel being operated as navigation center. it will be developed into housing a contionchas been delayed and they don't anticipate beginning the construction on that site until the end of 2021, so we're proposing to continue the use of the site as a navigation center until they're ready to break down. replacement sites that -- or

currently sites we're currently working on in terms of navigation centers, bayshore navigation center will have 128 beds. quinn navigation center will have 125 ds nd the somaiga cenr at 5th and bryant will have 86 so we're continuing to grow capacity and preserve the space available to do so. articulates the extensions that we're requesting and this this articulates how manye hple been served at each of the navigation center sites since opening. as you can see, theams a g for critical people unsheltered in our community and we want to continue this as long as possible. happy to take any questions that you might have. >> supervisor tang: great. thank you for the update. questions and comments? seeing none, i know we've talked about a lot of these centers and want to thank the department for atthis time, we'll open up item

2 to public comment. any members of the public that wish to speak, please come on up. >> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is dale seymour.ime erson in the city of san francisco and in the tenderloin. nt mf longe homeless, living out on the stso know a little bit about this situation with navigation centers. so now i run a school that hopes formerly homeless people that gets their lives together and there's a good number of my students that are living in navigation centers, so they're very important part of the fabric of t city. i just spoke at a land use summit last week in seattle, washington, and almost every question was directed at our navigation centers. so we really should realize what e hnhese navigation centers.

the navigation center civic center when i was homeless, lived in there. the department of homelessness put me in there for two years. so i know the importance of having a p t call youelf home, even if just for a few more days than we're expecting it to be. both of the navigation centers, actually improve the neighborhoods. i know what civic center was before it game a navigation center. that street was nothing nice whatsoever. i know what mission was before the navigation centers. some people that are protesting it say the navigation center brought all of that population to tmihe ion. no, it didn. no, it didn't. that population was there way before. and it's people that are in the navigation system that go in and on anyone and heir ous they're actually improving their . so whatever you can do to keep this extension going until september, we may have to be here again in september in case construction doesn't start. i don't want to see that block

being vacant not one day for your forg. congratulations. -- thank you for your consideration. >> good myannotte leonard wiki d we're with community partnership. we're here to support the centers in san francisco. the civic center has been a safe respite for 336 street homeless adults. we've served folks that otherwise would not access shelters, including 125 women and transgender women that are particularly vulrable living on the streets. and we have 46 participants that identify as veterans. housing takes time and it's a limited resource, but in our tit nt we've ensured that 153 formerly homeless adults are now in safe and permanent housing. that's 58% of our total.

prior to coming aion center, the neighborhood wasn't so great. the ground floor was mostly boarded up windows and neighbors expressed concerns about quality of life and safety issues. with our navignente in place, the entire ground floor is used. it's light and bright and we've rejuvenated the block and addressed concerns. remo te civic center would create opportunity form the community to erode. continued support enables us as a prior to focus on the folks meant to be serving. the continued operation as navigation centers and civic nter navigationter particular displays to the community that serving people experiencing homelessness with respect and is aing nitty is a san francisco priority. thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors.

my name is dennis mccray and i'm the director of shelters for al cepmunity services. we are the operator of the 19 missieton navigation center. as you can see from the statistics, we serve nearly 2,000 people there and we continue to serve people. we have 75 beds there right now. we are -- we are aware that there has been some concern about the impact that the navigation center on the immediate neighborhood where the navigation center is located. we actually are quite diligent about making sure that the immediate landscape around the navigation center is kept as decongested as possible. 95% of the peoay s on bock are already housed. and they have no connection to the navigation center.

so we are diligent in making sure that staff go out every day. we clean up every hour. they go out on a regular basis to fks to move on. hen we see a tent out there, we immediately call the hot team, to hve them come a address folks and if they are actually interested in services. we have an incredible relationship with the san francisco police department and they come by quite often. and we've been puttig u no loitering signs outside. so we will continue to do due diligence to make sure that that area is kept clear. thank you. >> how you doing? i'm joseph livingston. i stay at the navigation.

it's a good program. i was homeless. i've beomess since '95. and they're helping me find a place. i think yhould keep that. no don't put no other buildings up because you need buildings like that so they can h on' de buildings like that, how they going to get housing? you put it in places you trying to build, you know what i mean? keep the place. they doing a good job. and them people that hang out front, they've been hanging out there since that was a school. police didn't get them away from there then. they're not trying now. they're trying to make us look bad. thank you. >> good afternoon, board of supervisors. my name is george agler, i'm a resident over there at navigation center. now they help people that want the help. and they have helped me so much. i wish there was more of them.

it's great. and -- excuse me. you don't know how much they've med and i wish there was more of them, you know, to help everybody that was it, you know? an extension would be great to help everybody else like they helped me. eyed me tremendously get off the street and try to get a roof over my head. it's -- they're doing so much work for us, you know? and i want you to understand how i fe in my heart for the place. if you would just think about it. it gets a lot of people off the streets and puts a roof over their head and they help so much the people that want it and a lot of people want it. and the people that are hanging in front and stuff like that, i imaginehe there. don't know. but they don't get involved in our stuff. the people coming out there, they come out there and clean thearea, me sure everything's right, you know, for the residents that live in

there. and i just -- my heart wishes that you would give the extension and it would carry on, you know? the navigation center has done so much for everybody there, especially for me, you know? thank you. >> supervisor tang: thank you so much. are there any other members of public that wish to comment on item two? please -- please come on up, if you would like to speak on item two. name is michael rodriguez. and i'm a resident at the navigation center. i've been homeless for five or six years, directly i this neighborhood. if there wouldn't have been a navigation center, i wouldn't have been able to get myself get together again. we've had focus and focus on the things that we need in the community.

i've worked with the hot team to show them wre the encampments are at. in reality, they don't have enough help. there are not enough facilities to house everybody. there's not enough housing. we get circulated. we go in and get cleaned up and try to work on our paperwork and work on housing. if there is no housing, there is nothing they can do. we go back on the streets again and go back to the same camps. it's just a circle. and i think it's terrible that people are trying to criminalize housing, criminalize being homeless. you know, what we need is some affordable housing. i mean, who can afford $3,000 to $4,000 for a 1-bedroom. i don't make that much money in two months. so, yes, i believe that the

navigation center needs some kind of extension and maybe even open up other facilities to help us get us off the streets. >> supervisor tang: thank you very much for sharing that. any other members of the public, please come up for item 2. >> i guess you got to hear some opposition sometime. i guess my problem with the navigation center is is the city and county of san francisco is

not trained in standards of care in the contract. jeff kaczynski and his people have actually blocked the monitoring committee of doing spections of the navigation center. so we're at a point where we don't really know what's happening and i don't know what -- i don't know if the city auditor has done another audit to see what's happening, how long have been stayed, what type of services are happening. we just have a lot of problems because the grievance policy, the shelternpolicy, we -- it's just -- it just seems like they've thrown all of the protections with the navigation centers out the window. all of them.

the shelter extension policy. the griev policy. the shelter trainingmanual. it's an excessive list of them just throwing out laws to protect the homeless. ion tat s hraas horribledi c dump homeless people somewhere and just ignore the laws and protections that people have fought five, 10, or more years for. i think i just really believe that you should do something as to how jeff kaczynski and episcopal servicesf san francisco has refused overtly to follow the laws of -- and their contract of the ci and county >>upervisor tang: thank you very much. any other members of the public that wish to comment on item 2?

okay. seeing none, public comment is closed. coguquestions, further comments on item 2? okay. seeing c we get a motion to pass this forward with positive recommendation as a committee report? >> supervisor safai: so moved. >> supervisor tang: okay. we'll could that without objection. thank you, colleagues. madam clerk, any other items for us today? >> clerk: there's no further business. >> supervisor tang: okay. thank you. we're adjourned. .

>> working for the city and county of san francisco will immerse you in a vibrate and dynamic city on sfroert of the art and social change we've been

on the edge after all we're at the meeting of land and sea world-class style it is the burn of blew jeans where the rock holds court over the harbor the city's information technology xoflz work on the rulers project for free wifi and developing projects and insuring patient sta of at san francisco general hospital our it professionals make guilty or innocent available and support the house/senate regional wear-out system your our employees joy excessive salaries but working for the city and county of san francisco give us employees the unities to contribute their ideas and energy and commitment to shape the city's future but for

considering a career with the city and county of san francisco

>> good afternoon. thank you for coming i'm happy to be joined this afternoon by sfmtator russ kin and howard -- as you know powered scooters appeared on our streets overnight in march. they pose some really challenge. emissions free transportation and makes it easy to connect with public transit is a good thing and something that we welcome but we cannot sacrifice public safety. these ridden on sidewalks pose danger. there are reports of broken

bones and near misses. the city has received nearly 1800 complaints about scooters inin them blocks public space. it can hurt local businesses and affect the ability of all of us toe ou n city. the city supports scooter scaring to the point it makes our transportation system safer, more equitable. we are here today to announce the launch of san francisco powered scooter p and pilot program. this permit program represents a thoughtful, coordinated and effective approach to make sure that san francisco strikes the right balance. the program incorporates the

importance of my earlier cease and desist letter, and state and local laws, that prohibit riding on sidewalks and itlu new component. we have have innovation but it must keep your sidewalks safe and accbor all pedestrians. the program provides the framework though make sure that the companies operateing in the public right of way of doing so lawfully and accountable for their business and tools for the city tueorceent a needed. permits are available today on the sfmtv website and ed russ

kin will provide more information about them in a moment. i would like to note that this has been a collaborative effort pervisors, my offce, pof wor and other. began in legislation passed at the board of supervisors and signed by mark farrell. i would like to thank aaron peskin who has ad o this legislation. under that legislation any company operating shared powered scooters in san francisco must have a permit from the sfmta a june 4 to have their scooters parked on sidewalks or any public space. that means any scooter company operating is required to mover e it's scooters by june 4.

only those issued permits may be able to continue. san francisco supports transportation innovation but it can't come at the price of privacy, accessible, and safety. this permit program strikes the right balance. i would like to introduce ed russ kin to talk more about the new permit ro>> thank you. i want to thank the city attorney for hiseadersp an the great support of his staff as we have been developing the legislation that required the permits the legislation by board of dirtors to establish the permit program and their support for us in developing the application itself. as the city's transportation department we excted about

the prospect that these powered scooters could bring. their zero emission and compact and i haven't ridden one, but i hear their pretty fun. this is something that we certainly want to be s of, but it's the if that is really at question here in tomorrows of why we are putting a regulatory pcess i place. last year the sfmts board of directors and san francisco board of supervisors, and transportation authority adopted a set of principles set to govern emerging technologies and services on our streets and these principals embody san fransco policies as relate to equity and affordable and

environment and transparency and consumer protection and worker right. we have taken those principles and embedded them in a permit program that we have established and you will see in the permit aapplication. just become something is innovative doesn't mean it's good for our city. we arehis to put in place the regulatory for example work that makes sure that we can get the best of the transportation benefits for the people of san francisco without some of the detriments such as we have seen on the streets already. the city attorney made reference to sty and that is our number one concern. we want to make sure that the use of the scooters is being

donecephaly and appropriately when used and when stored and not using them to on sidewalks or block sidewalks and there are the two main concerns we have seen and weo the permit will require a robust plan to show how they will ensure the proper u a storage of their scooters. there are provisions that speak to the people. who support the scooter share programs whether employees or contractors, there are privacy protection. we are in the business of transportation and mobility but not in the business of permitting harvesting of personal data, so one of our requirements is making it clear that any permitee would have to

make apparent to them what data would be collected and how it would be used and give them the opportunity to take out of sharing that data and still be able to take the service. there are numerous other aspects of the permits we are establishing as part of this one year pilot where we will be able to work with a successful perm permitee to make sure this service can be manifested in our streets that works for san francisco. we will issue up to five permits for a total of 2500 scooters, 1250 in the first six months and if things are goingl expand up to 2500. during this period we will require the submission of data and gathering data from external sources and 311 complaints and others so that we can evaluate

how well these scooters are working whether meeting their promises and addressing some of the issues that we have seen to date. at that pointwoe at a decision point of whether to terminate the program, continue the program, discontinue the program, expand the program. we expect to learn a lot f enforcement is part of the program and we want to make sure to the extent that we grant a it and we have appropriate mechanisms in place whether confiscating scooters or taking the permit. we don't want to get there, but we need to be able to give the public assurance that in granting access that we are going to enforce the conditions of the permits that we

established. one of our great partners and enforcement in the public right-of-way and really in the management is san francisco public works and w wked with them in the permitg application and will continue to work with them as this plays out. i would like to pass the mic. to our director ofublic work. >> i am excited that we are putting a pilot permit program in place as many of you know when these scooters handed in our secretos in fran, we have been working really hard to try and make sure that at least they are following some kind or d siny handed we have had to pick up over 500 scooters on the streets that have been parked inappropriately, means not put in a safe place and created trip and falls or not

been parked in the right place, so this permit process that will be in place is one that will help the city understand if these actually belong on our streets in san francisco. start june 4, we will then be picking up scooters anywhere because the good lines have been set forth as we have heard. we will pick them up and not an easily retrievable process. tily will be held as evidence this permit process is in place. w w theity and most importantly we want to see if there is a place for them in san francisco so, this pilot will encourage the corporations to apply and go through the process and we willel the right people and see how it work. thank you. >> thank you ed and mohammed.

with that we will take questions and they will be dealt with appropriately by one of us up here. >> how will theoter under t law if someone is helping abet a public nuisance and they have notice, they can be held liable, so thecoot sr companies are responsible for conduct that they know is occurring once they have been put on notice. if you look at the cease and desist letter that i have sent, we have put them on notice as to things that we would expect from them, so certainly they can be held responsible for conduct of people that they are encouraging to ride. >> fines? >> if i was to bring an action

against mass balance for public nuisance certainly, but that is not what the nature t enforcement action has been so far and not what isontemplated under the permit program but we s a public nuisance to bring an action if so nolteed. i think that what you have seen so f the city in a cordnated way has been operating to try and mitigate any potential public nuisance so far. in terms of a letter to cease and desist and the director of public works dedicated the resources needed to ensure that we minimize the possibility that there were scootersances on from the three of us

collectively standing here in terms of resources already dedicated and the quickness with which the pilot program has been made available that the city willing toicat the resources that we nee moke s w sehat right balance betweenromotions transportation invasion and not ill you address helmets in cnie. any way . >> the current state laws requires person using scooters to have a driver's license are a helmet and ride in the street. our permits say that they have

to comply with state and local law. >> does it require they offer helmets? >> it does not. we are not being too prescriptive but telling them how be client with the specific permit of what they are applying for. >> what steps are you going to take into account when deciding who gets these permits? we will absolutely be accounting for their pst pema it's notnt t ba punitive way, but i think their past performance will be a good indicator of future performance

they ability to be client with the esting state and lca laws as well as pential permits, so w directed to factor that in and we will absolutely do so. >> the soter permits are available effective today and t is the soonest one might get one? >> the applications are available today so any scooter company will be able to go to the website and pull down application. we areng a deadline or june 7 for the submission so this is a fixed one year pilot program, so we will likely wait until june 7 until we have collected any and all applications at which point we will endeavor to review them as quickly as possible. applications will be working with companies to get them

complete as soon as possi the city attorney said we are hoping to issue permits by the end of june, so as soon as the end of june given our exper with pas perm proms it probably wi take some time to get complete applions and complete the review but we are shooting for the end of june to have these permitted. as quickly after that as they can get them out on the street will be up to them. >> look at how quickly this has been developing the fact that in leha couple of months that we have a program that has been designed by the mta and we are taking applications today and you have a tight turnd i tha the degree to which the city collectively uses this as impo botrtnt in of erinst transportation

invasion, but also protecting the health and safety of people on our streets the ans and i wao applaud the mta for how quickly they have designrogram and the enforcement assistance of the department of public work. w isre you saw the city coming together to recognize that this is important for our city. one more question. >> how many -- [indiscernible] >> three. we have had heard rumors of more that will be applying so you have heard the three that are out there. >> will you be likely to not get a permit based ono far? >> i don't want to speak for the msa director and we don't know who is going to apply yet.

>> is there past behavior tha would preclude them from getting a permit. >> i don't want to prejudice the application and review process. we have some information about t th the others but we want this to be fair and we will give a fair review of their application. >> is the c >> yes,ur intent is to recover our cost. the state law restricts us to cost recovery only and i don't have permit fee. there is few different fees that apply includin rerveould reire them to submit to address any others that the city has. this isesigned to keep the city whole in terms of

expenditure. i sent out mynd letter and as of june 4 until such time as the permits have been granted, they should not be operatingn public rights of way or parking on public streets, that is correct. we have made it clear that as of june 4 they have to be off of city sts and think the mta director has made it quite clear that past behavior will be taken into account in terms of the application process, so i think it will behoove everybody to follow the directive issued today by having them off public street it is on june 4 and in the event they are not the mta director will review that

behavior and i will reserve the right to do anything legally to make sure that the law is followed that i need to do. thank yo sfgovtv.org. >> neighborhoods and san francisco as exists and fascist as the people that i think inhabitable habit them the bay area continues to change for the better as new start up businesses with local collaborative spaces the as the community appeal is growing too.

>> what anchors me to the community i serve is a terminal connection this is the main artery of the southeast neighborhood that goes around visitacion valley and straight down past the ball park and into the south of market this corridor the hub of all activity happening in san francisco. >> i'm barbara garcia of the wines in the bayview before opening the speculation we were part of bayview and doing the opera house every thursday i met local people putting their wares out into the community

barbara is an work of a symbol how the neighborhood it changing in a a positive way literally homemade wine that is sold in the community and organized businesses both old and new businesses coming together to revitalizes this is a yoga udioy a t be able a part of community going on in the bayview i wanted to have a bectually doing that with te support of community. >> how everybody reasons together to move each other forward a wonderful run for everybody out here. >> they're hiring locally and selling locally. >> it feels like a community effort. >> i was i think the weather

is beautiful that is what we can capture the real vibe of san francisco i love it i can go ongoing and on and on aboutn the at 62942

together we can support your children. it's been my dream to start is a valley school since i was little girl. i'm having a lot of fun with it

(clapping) the biggest thing we really want the kidsav a lot of times parents say that valley schools have a lot of problems but we want them to follow directions but we want them to have a wonderful time and be an affordable time so the kids will go to school here. we hold thees to no longer 12 and there's 23 teachers. i go around and i watch each class and there's certain children i watched from babies and it's exciting to see them

after today. the children learn how to follow directions and it ends up helping them in their regular schooling. they get self-confidents and today, we had a residual and a lot ofe tagend i hope they get the bug and want to dance for the rest of their