stated in the poem inscribed on the statue of liberty. give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. what are our values as a country? what is our commitment to basic human rights. president trump and his administration through their actions are causing massive trauma for thousands of children and their families and as san franciscans we should join the ever louder chorus of families calling to the end of this practice, including senator feinstein who introduced keeping families together act that will prevent the department of homeland security from taking children from their families at the border. thank you to my colleagues for co-sponsoring this legislation. i will be in the streets with thousands of others in san francisco and across the

country on june 30th and every other day demanding an immediate end to the separation of children from their parents. thank you. >> president breed: thank you, supervisor fewer, supervisor yee? >> supervisor yee: i just want to thank supervisor fewer for bringing this forward. trump stated he doesn't want our country to be a refugee camp. i think what he wants is a concentration camp for immigrant children. >> president breed: thank you, supervisor. super voixesor kim? supervisor kim? >> supervisor kim: submit. >> president breed: supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you, i will submit in memoriam for sammy botswan, store on north beach columbus avenue who died last week, three days after being knocked over by a fleeing shoplifter. i knew him and met him many times.

bay city news reported that 31-year-old suspect was taken into custody after the incident and, as i said, 3 days later, sammy passed away. he was beloved by the neighborhood and it is tragic beyond words. to his widow madelaine and son zed, my sincere condolences on behalf of the board of supervisors. the rest i will submit. >> clerk: thank you, supervisor peskin. supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: thank you. i want to follow-up on supervisor fewer and yee's words about the children being separated from their parents at the border. i'm jewish and when i grew up i heard lots of stories about my family being torn apart in europe during world war ii. and in fact, i had a great aunt

and cousin who hid in the countryside in france during the war while my great uncle fought in the underground resistance and was captured and sent to auschwitz. he actually survived the camps but i grew up learning the history of how jewish people and many others as well were rounded up, taken in trains to camps, and then parents torn away from their children and the children being killed. and for the first time in the united states of america, i feel like something close to that is happening. i haven't been able to sleep. i have been racking my brain on what we can do about this. i was listening to the radio this morning while taking my daughter to camp and hearing about a congresswoman who went

to a prison to visit several hundred women who were being detained there because there's no more rooms in the detention centers for immigrants throughout the countrythey are sending people to prison. and of the hundreds of women she met there, only two knew where their children were. i turned around to take my child out of her car seat and i got this sudden you know, pit in my stomach and lump in my throat, what would i do if the government took her away from me, if i didn't know where she was, and i had no power to do anything about it? and i just felt a rage and a sadness that i have never felt before in this country. and i just feel like it's incumbent upon every single one of us who is not in that circumstance right now to be doing everything in our power to fight back. children should never be used as pawns and bargaining chips

to get anybody's policy through on anything, no matter what it is. and i got, i forced myself, i don't know if this was stupid or not but i felt i had to be educated and aware about what's going on. i forced myself to listen to the recording that was smuggled out of the center and the children crying for their mothers and their fathers. and the person there saying in spanish, oh it sounds like an orchestra, making fun of it. i just don't know what we are coming to in this country. but i do know that we cannot stand silent. and that we all have to stand together and do whatever we can to fight back and to make this absolutely unacceptable. i'm really grateful to senator feinstein for introducing legislation at the federal level, the keeping families together act. i'm grateful there are big actions planned this weekend

and next. in fact, my office, together with the mayor farrell are working together to make sure all the permits are there so we can have a massive, massive rally. i've been racking my brain with my colleagues. what can we do? should we send a delegation to texas. should we hold a board meeting in front of the warehouse where they are caging children? what can we do? should we organize a national strike? but i do believe this kind of conduct, in this country, deserves a type of response that's different from our normal response. and i will continue to brainstorm, to work with anyone and everyone who feels the same as i do, to fight. to fight back. to protest in the streets. to use civil disobedience, to support our federal delegation fighting to change the law in washington.

but this, this is -- president trump, who is the president of the united states and holds a majority from his party in congress, this is their fault, and this is their doing, and it is incumbent upon every single one of us to fight back. and towards that end as well, i'm introducing a ballot measure today that sets in place a set of checks and balances to ensure that we don't use our local funds to support and discriminate against historically marginalized groups. whether immigrants, lgbt community, women, muslims, all people of color. this administration has enacted countless policies attacking these groups of people and we must not participate. the measure would also serve as a counter to any measure on the ballot that seeks to weaken our strong sanctuary laws in san francisco. and i want to thank supervisors

yee, tang and fewer for joining me in introducing this measure, and the rest i submit. >> clerk: thank you, supervisor ronen. supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: thank you, madam clerk. today i just have one in memoriam. i would like to end in memoriam of patty delaligue. she was a long time employee of the sfmta. she moved to the bay area as an undergraduate at stanford and studied engineering. she was the type of person that really didn't sit on the sideline and was active in many ways in the community. she was a faithful attendee of

saint aiden's episcopal in diamond heights. she served on the excelsior improvement district for several years and in our district we just celebrated our 60th anniversary of that association and much of the work and reinvigoration of that association was under her leadership and the work she did with many of the other leaders of that community. she created the excelsior book club and was very fond of many authors, particularly around the french revolution. but, you know, many people in our neighborhood will be missed as they pass away. but patty was one in particular that touched our hearts. she was a really, really sweet person. she loved working with the sfmta, as i said. and as many of you have heard me talking about the parking wars we have in our neighborhood, she tried to tackle them and come up with strategies ways to alleviate

some stress neighbors have, rather than fighting with one another and was very successful, actually. i committed to her, right before she passed i would not shy away from that issue. that we would continue her legacy and continue to work on those issues as it pertained to trying to improve the issues of pedestrian safety and pathways for elderly to pass and those with young children and also trying to alleviate some of the parking stress. there will be a memorial of her life this saturday june 23rd from 1-4 at the mira loma park clubhouse, 350 o' shawnecy. >> i would like to adjourn in memory of bruce billing ham, a long time columnist for the marina times.

he passed may 8th, following a long illness and he was 66 years old. bruce was absolutely indispensable to the marina community. his commentary was peppered one-liners. we honored bruce at the board in 2007, when we were done he said to all of us, may i now go back to making fun of the board? bruce's work influenced and was influenced by herb cane who was a friend and mentor to him. in addition to his incisive wit in his writing he was known for many talents, cooking, and playing instruments. bruce loved his work as much as he loved this city and more than anything bruce always reminded us to not take ourselves too seriously. he is survived by three brothers and former wife. there will be a memorial

service at the new life church at the nazarene located at 300 elois street. his writing resonated with many in the marina and beyond. he will be dearly missed by friends, neighbors and readers alike. i have another in memoriam for lilliana presiado. she was tragically killed in an accident last week, one of the few female plumbers with the city and county of san francisco and member of local 38. she joined the sfpuc in 2012 as an apprentice plumber and soon thereafter promoted to utility plumber, she was a dedicated public servant, beloved daughter, friend to many. local 38 established a fund to her daughter. and there will be a memorial service friday june 22nd at 10:00 a.m. at saint peter's catholic church. i have one last thing.

with regard to the horrific acts of the trump administration. just one second, please. sorry. where did it go? okay. so colleagues, along the lines with supervisor fewer and supervisor ronen, i too, have been absolutely devastated by what's been going on. and i'm introducing a resolution supporting senator feinstein's keep families together act. a little different than what supervisor fewer is doing and i think anything we can do on this is an action we should take. as a mother, i've just been sickened and outraged that our

government is separating parents from their children at the border. i too listened to that audio last night in horror. to the cries of the children that have been ripped from their parents. i'm probably going to have to just submit this because my daughter, whose 8, asked me last night if anybody would ever do this to us. i promised myself too that i would never cry at the board of supervisors, but if anything would make me, if anything was going to make me cry, it's going to be this. i'm not going to read the rest of my notes because i think we are all coming from the same place, the sense of feeling hopeless and helpless and sense of being in complete and utter shock that our government could do something like this. and i want to be, i'm so glad

we live in a city that all 11 of us find this so intolerable and disgusting and i will do whatever i can to work to make sure that we undo the evil that has been perpetuated on these parents and on these children. thank you. >> clerk: thank you, supervisor stefani. supervisor tang? >> supervisor tang: submit. >> clerk: supervisor yee, did you want to be re-referred. supervisor breed? submit? supervisor cohen. >> supervisor cohen: thank you, madam clerk. today, colleagues and those in the chamber i would like to take an opportunity to recognize and commemorate june teenth. june 19th is juneteenth day. while the emancipation

proclamation was signed in 1862 it went in effect in 1863. black people were still held as slaves until 1865 and today's holiday is called juneteenth and i understand there are few that know or understand the significance it has in this country. it recognizes the day that, when the last people being held of slaves resided in galveston, texas, they realized that they were free. as most people know and recognize, slavery was disgusting, it was brutal, evil, century-long institution of our nation's history. the impact of which casts along shadow on our country today. slavery killed an untold number of black people without regard for the value of their lives, or the contributions of exploited physical labor to build this country.

even after the abolition of slavery, state sanctioned violence and terrorism persisted during the reconstruction period, particularly in the southern states. this violence particularly lynching was a system of oppression and terrorism to teach black people lessons about staying in their place. the goal was to send the message that no matter what, black people were to remember that they would always be considered beneath or lesser than white people. and this message, which was reinforced, or over looked by the government, that so many soon would protect them led millions to flee the south and seek refuge in northern and western states. and what is known as the great migration. this internal migration is something i want to highlight, not only in the context of

juneteenth but in the moment of disgraceful national history, when our government, is systematically punishing parents seeking refuge in united states of america. parents seeking asylum at our shores and borders are being punished in the most evil of ways, being separated from their children. their crime? their crime is simply just believing that the united states is still a beacon of hope from their dire situation and that immigrating away from terrorism, much like those black folks who came to the place called california almost 80 plus years ago will mean living in peace and having a better opportunity for their families. the department of homeland

security recently revealed that almost 2,000 children have been taken from their parents in the last six weeks under the federal administration's new policy. children were housed in cages, on concrete floors. and don't always have access to anyone who speaks their native language. we are causing harm and trauma in real-time. the last impact of which remains to be seen. the lasting impact of which remains to be seen. we have seen familiar moments in history. there is no excuse for these actions. so today, i am happy to join supervisor fewer as a co-sponsor on a resolution opposing the current practice of separating children from their family. i would like to request we close today's meeting in the memory and recognition of the

millions of black people held in captivity as slaves, whose names we will never know, whose stories we will never know, and of course for the children and the family currently entangled in this horrific saga of misguided state sanctioned immoral violence. the rest i submit. >> clerk: thank you, supervisor cohen. [ applause ] madam president, seeing no other names on the roster, that concludes the introduction of new business. >> president breed: thank you for your comments. and with that, we have a 3:00 p.m. special order. and madam clerk. >> clerk: items 35-38, madam president. these items were continued from february 13th 2018. >> president breed: yes. let's call our first 3:00 p.m. special order. >> clerk: item 35 is public hearing in persons interested in a community plan evaluation

issued by the planning department under the ceqa august 30th 2017 for the proposed project at 2918-2924 mission street approved on november 30th, 2017 to demolish an approximately 5,200 square foot one-story commercial building and adjacent 6,400 square foot surface parking lot to construct an 8-story 85-foot talleres den shall building with ground floor retail. item 36 is motion to affirm determination the mission street is exempt from further environmental review. item 37 motion to conditionally reverse the department's determination and item 38 is motion to direct appropriation of findings to reverse the community plan evaluation determination. >> president breed: thank you. colleagues, for this hearing today we will be considering the adequacy, accuracy, sufficiency and completeness of

the planning department's determination that the proposed project at 2918-2924 mission street is categorically exempt from environmental review under a community plan evaluation. without objection, we will proceed as follows. up to 10 minutes for a presentation by the appellant or appellant representative. up to two minutes per speaker for those who are in support of the appeal. up to 10 minutes for presentation by the planning department. up to 10 minutes for the project sponsor or their representative. up to ten minutes in speaker in opposition to the appeal. and finally, up to 3 minutes for a rebuttal by the appellant or the appellant representative. and with that, colleagues, are there any objections to proceeding in this way? seeing none. supervisor ronen, as a supervisor who represents the district, do you have any remarks? not at this time. so with that, we will begin

this hearing with the appellant or the appellant representative. you will have 10 minutes. >> thank you, madam president and members of the board, my name is scott weaver, i'm here on behalf of the calle cuatro. there are a number of things about this project. the direct impacts on the school children, preschool children everyday for 18-24 months will see construction, noise, dust, debris, fumes maybe. and disruption to their learning, to their play time, and to their nap time. we are also troubled by the lack of an up-to-date assessment of cumulative impacts on projects such as this. especially giving everything

that we have seen on the ground between 2008 and now. cumulative impacts is why all environmental regiments require a cumulative impact including ceqa. section 15065 considers impacts cumulative in light of past, present and probably future projects. nowhere does it say just built projects. it's past, present and foreseeable probably future projects. and after all, isn't that what planning is about? looking into the future? trying to figure out the big picture. and maybe make adjustments along the line. because there may be unintended consequences down the line if you don't do that and it hasn't been done here.

the eastern neighborhood plan e.i.r., most aggressive being 2,054 units for the mission. that's our exhibit 12 describes that. but as of the fourth quarter 2017 there were 3409 units in the pipeline for the period between 2008 and the present. the original scoping of 2054 units was for the period 2000-2025, not 2008. i know for a fact at least another 400 units have to be added to that 3400 number, because at least that number of units was built in that 2000-2008 period. and this doesn't include some of the smaller projects which i was not able to include in the

grid, exhibit 14 because of the intensity of the work that would have been involved. this is consistent with what is happening throughout the eastern neighborhoods. scoped at 9,000 units between 2000-2025. and according to quarter 4 2015 eastern monitoring report the number is 11,000 units. as to jobs, the number of jobs projected for the eastern neighborhoods was 22,000 but the monitoring report showed there were 30,000. plus another five million square feet of office space to be built. that's about 30,000 additional persons, so population wise, we are way over. and remember, the eastern neighborhoods actually a pretty small geographic area and the mission is even smaller.

only one square mile so these will be pretty significant impacts. we will have seven more years of probably impacts that the pipeline doesn't start, it doesn't stop on december 31st, 2017. how is it possible for the e.i.r. that only scoped 2,000 units to discuss cumulative impacts on more than 3400 units, probably closer to 4,000 units. i'm not saying we don't need to build housing. we should do this thoughtfully and equitably because the future of san francisco and the mission is at stake. the world in 2018 is so different than it was in 2008. we have had this unprecedented growth. we have had higher rents at a rate not anticipated, i don't believe.

we have had extensive gentrification of our neighbors, again not anticipated at least if you read the text of the e.i.r. we have had changing modes of transportation. i could go on all the things that changed from 2008 that couldn't have been foreseen. the eastern neighborhoods plan e.i.r. could not have taken into account those changes. so what will the eastern neighborhoods and mission look like in 5, 10, 15 years from now. and of course the impacts are going to be greater than the eastern neighborhoods plan envisioned. we could expect to see problems related to traffic pedestrian safety, open space needs, child care, schools and community benefits. this goes hand in hand with achieving or not achieving, as the case may be, the planning

priorities under the mission area plan which call for a very high level of priority, i might add. the preservation and enhancement of our commercial corridors. and we are going the wrong direction on that right now. so exhibits 74 describes a number of, it's the crisis on mission street. there are about maybe 25-30 projects that are happening. not all housing projects. about a dozen are restaurant conversions, upscale cafes coming in. a climbing gym on mission street? this is happening right now. what is it going to be like 5-10 years from now? mission street is the backbone of the mission. and it supports its cultural and commercial needs. but it's getting upscaled from

low-price point community serving businesses to fancy restaurants and wine bars and high-end rl. this is by definition what gentrification does and the gentrification this project creates will only throw another log on that fire. in map 2020, the collaboration the community has done with planning and the mayor's office we have attempted to ameliorate those problems and we have had some successful things, i think. but the forces at work here present a high tide that is difficult for us to fight against. finally, i want to circle back to the impacts on the children at the preschool. t rodriguez. construction, noise, vibration,

debris, dust, ceqa required study of direct impacts affecting health and safety. and the e.i.r. is insufficient in this case, in this particular case, in this particular school yard because there are several unique factors at play. first these children are very young. they are preschoolers and exposures such as these could have long term consequences on their physical and mental health, i provided literature that supports that. secondly an especially vulnerable socio economic population. third the school campuses and playgrounds are directly adjacent to the project site. and fourth, i wanted to point out that there is a speech and learning center right next to the site. these children are already delayed. so can we say with a degree of certainty that the mitigations

in the eastern neighborhood plan e.i.r. are sufficient? has the city done all it can to make sure the city is safe to put all precautions in place. am i sure these mitigations will actually work?

i have to ask those questions because otherwise i would feel i was a bad parent. after all, we want the best for our children and i do not believe that what we have now is -- [buzzer] >> president breed: thank you very much. now we will open it up to public comment for those who are here to speak in support of the appeal only. so if you support the appeal, please come forward, you will have up to two minutes. if you are opposed to the appeal, there will be a time for you to speak later on during this hearing.

>> if you talk about it, i support it, they should have all the support in the mission district. i've seen what they have done in my district. no thought of queen bee because she could only do so much, now she is the queen bee, [buzzing] she could go all over the city doing whatever she wants. i'm here to talk about my district. now that queen bee is stepping up in the game i could speak what i want to say about london, not london but the western addition. i'm here to say dog gone it if you could do it, do it for them because our ace is on the case make sure they are going to reset, rewind and come back to the community i've been born and raised in.

and it's called bilmo but i call it the fill no more. we are talking about the feds, and the state. where the black folks at hunter's point. they lie to us about toxic, billions of dollar and took our black businesses away from us, i am only 63 i have seen them revitalize and tuck it away. we are here in 2018, what does that mean? we got queen bee y'all and we will make sure it happens but i want to tell all y'all in city hall, i'm here protecting queen bee. i will be looking out for anybody who will seize the queen now. our black folks aren't but that many p but dog gone it you better not do anything to the queen while she is in that seat because she will be looking after us, and my kids and my grand kids. my great granddaughter said daddy, is she the mayor of the city now? i'm about to introduce her to the queen. >> president breed: thank you,

mr. washington. >> clerk: next speaker. if you are here to speak in support of the appellant that is the topic of the hearing. proceed. >> i'm here for that. good afternoon, supervisors. researchers at the harvard center on the developing child found early experiences environments which children develop in their earliest years could have a lasting impact on successes in school and life. the more adversity a child faces the greater the odds of developmental delay and later health problems. the children attending the rodriguez school are 3-5 and in their most formative years. the project sponsor has chosen to have their own study conducted. it found to cover one quarter of the mission playground prior to 9:00 a.m. and bartering would cover almost the entire playground between the hours of 9-11 a.m. i work at mission neighborhood centers.

at m.n.c. they are rotated to play outside exactly between the hours of 9-11 a.m. we know the children will be forced to play in the shadows at the bartlett street location. while study may show no impact on the mission side we need to be sure. whatever damage is done by the project while the permanent irreversible and detrimental impact not only on growth and development but on future opportunities as well. they are relying on you to be their voice and protectors. supervisors if this was your child attending your school what would you want done to protect your child? what i'm asking you to do is to measure twice and cut once. when the choice between expedited development and the

health and safety of a child's life the answer should be a no-brainer. we need another study subjective by the planning department so we can confirm these children can live and play and develop in the sunlight and in a healthy productive manner. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please? >> hi, i'm allison hayes. with transportation impacts, pedestrian and bike safety and air quality, it should be obvious that the thing that needs to be analyzed is what will happen after this and related projects are built rather than what is already there. planning and the developer rely on a fair memo that compare traffic to earlier baselines somehow concluded there will be no future impacts.

done on a week day afternoon. the three intersections they chose make no sense. there's no baseline in the plan e.i.r. you could throw out mission and 24th analysis since the baseline was before red lines went in and traffic was diverted to other streets. that leaves the trail and 23rd which recently went on a road diet and is nearly three quarters of a mile away. notice also the plan e.i.r. measured congestion while the memo looked at volume, that's two different metrics. under v.m.t. conclusion that mission development won't cause significant transportation impacts is based on an old 2002 and 2010-2012 modeling that ignores new realities. for example, there's zero indication t.m.c.'s were considered or e-commerce is fueling the dramatic rise in the number of delivery vehicles. public transit studies in the

memo are equally flawed showing speeds either increased or decreased depending on study date and direction traveled and no analysis of this projects direct or cumulative impacts in the future. simply put these studies are worthless and claims the eastern neighborhood's plan e.i.r. is still relevant are a flimsy fantasy. thank you. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> walking, biking and other modes of transportation, while affluent residents prefer the convenience of having everything brought to their door including their transportation.

they prefer privatized t.n.c.'s and shuttles while their less affluent neighbors who can't afford these services rely on public transit and added private vehicle congestion and double parked cars will slow vital traffic. groceries, toilet paper, meals, even a single cup of coffee or a single smoothie and i've seen both of those. deliveries arrive in trucks and private vehicles at all times of the day and into the evening. the impacts of traffic growth lead to greater impacts on pedestrians, increasing the likelihood of pedestrian injury in an area where parents walk and bike on smaller side streets. in a city attempting the goal of vision 0 this has insufficient mitigation to the potential harms on the pedestrian population.

imagine the tnc's and shuttle 67 of 75 units dropping off and picking up there everyday. imagine the vehicles circling the block, idling and queuing further patrons from warning. know we have insufficient data request readily observe these impacts and further study as necessary. thank you. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, board. my name is rafael, i'm a member of the calle cuatro district. we strive to ensure our children and early child education centers have the right to develop appropriately. to have access to their development and access to safety and help. this construction being built on 25th and mission will

critically hurt the development of these children in the preschool this is a very critical point in their development and as they grow, this can affect their long life learning abilities. further adding construction that causes further health hazards will continue to put our children and community behind. how could we do that putting their health safety and development at risk? so part of what we are asking here today is to really take thought in this process of what's really more important.

we also look into how this study was done. and that we need to have a third independent study of the shadow and the wind study. because i think funded through the developer as well as through the planning department. thank you. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> hi, my name is susan, i'm a public school parent, member of plaza 16 coalition and former pediatric nurse and i want to comment about three things. the physiological needs children have for sunshine, the need for an independent shadow study and the effect of construction on an elementary school. i know from experience with the developers near the marshal elementary school that their shadow study and the shadow study that one of our parents who is an environmental engineer did showed a different result.

what 'surprise. they claimed by elevating the playground one story it was going to eliminate the shadow on the school playground, that was not true. it's impossible to have one's need for vitamin d met completely through dietary intake. kids need sunshine. otherwise they develop ricketts which has a long list of negative impacts for children. they need sunshine. it's not just something that makes them happier. the third thing i want to say is to comment on my experience with construction near an elementary school. outside of the marshal elementary school they were putting in one streetlight.

one streetlight. for the entire four hours they were working on that, absolutely no teaching or learning went on in the school. there was so much noise. that was one streetlight. imagine the disruption that is going to occur during the construction of this building. so those are my three points and i hope you will take those into consideration, i'm not going to use my whole two minutes. thank you for your time. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> my name is mary mendoza, a teacher with sfusd and member of calle cuatro. i want to talk about two points, the need for children to have recess. i'm teaching children with severe autism and it is

absolutely essential the children be able to go outside and play as part of their curriculum. their ability to interact socially is encouraged by their time outside and their exploratory sensory development, especially in the sunshine when it is a sunny day, makes for a really special day for them and it's necessary for them to be able to develop, as an individual. they are already so challenged with their needs and abilities. and so, you think, oh recess, you know, big deal, it's fun time, but it's really a necessary part of the day. so that's one thing i wanted to speak on. the other thing i wanted to speak on, it's come to my attention that reds cafe, that their rent has nearly tripled and when you think about the

businesses, you know, in the community that you live and work in, that currently live about a block away, this is a restaurant where the servers know your order when you come in. when they greet you with sincerity that they know, you know, how long it's been since you have come into the restaurant. that's a rarity to have people who really care about you when you come into a business and have that neighborhood feel and that's something that the mission is losing, same as minute by minute. [buzzer] >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> [inaudible] i own a small business in the mission, we do design fabcation and work in the construction industry, the construction of this proposed building time with large

quantities of concrete require drilling, blasting and release harmful particles in the air. chrystalline silica is found and can travel into the lungs causing an incurable lung disease caused by even small exposure. also causes lung cancer, c.o.p.d. kidney disease and could trigger asthma in young children. in september last year after years of known risk and thousands of fatalities due to exposure, osha enacted new regulations to make work sites safer for its workers with the goal of preventing 600 deaths every year. i'm concerned we don't have proper protections for secondary adjacent exposure.

they are at greater risk of harm. thank you. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> hello, i'm karen cliff, i'm a retired social worker and so for -- >> [off mic] could you use the microphone? >> sorry, karen cliff. karen cliff. >> clerk: ma'am, i'm resetting

your time, so please begin. >> sorry, i'm a retired social worker, so for more than 50 years have been concerned with providing and protecting basic human needs such as housing. this project does not provide sufficient affordable housing. i have been in district 9 for 34 years and have been lucky and don't have to move, i hope you could provide and protect affordable housing for those not so lucky in district 9. >> clerk: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> hi there, my name is vicki. i'm born and raised in the mission district san francisco. from calle cuatro as well, former non-profit worker. one thing that hits me the most are things disappearing in the mission. from sunlight to working families to school children, it's really sad when i walk

around, i don't see them any more. i wish people could see the mission i grew up in. also, i just am amazed that people don't know the impact of children, when you are doing a lot of luxury development, let's look at the neighborhoods even if you are saying you are exempt from a community evaluation plan, let's look at the children nonetheless. we have to protect them. and the fact they are special needs children they need more protection, right? i would think that alone, just the fact we have children involved here, it warrants considering this appeal, approving this appeal. the businesses are suffering. i think about everything that's disappeared and i think of red cafe. i agree with ms. mary here who red cafe is one of the last institutions been there a long time. so i walk by there occasionally waiting for the day that i will see those signs before they disappear.

i'm sorry, i get emotional but it's my hood where i grew up and it's no longer that. also i'm part of the alex memorial committee and something not considered is the sight line, one thing more and more people from the mission could see the memorial and the one sight line that is a perfect site is the 26 mission site right in front of red cafe, we put up this building the memorial won't be seen by the community that fought for it. so considering all these factors we need to make sure that community is involved. we have to make sure that community is involved or else basically disappears, it's important and it's critically important that we make sure we save everybody -- [buzzer] [please stand by...

>> i urge you to defeat this. we don't need more empty units that will be error b. and b. or affordable by people who can

afford to have their latte delivered on an electric scooter. that is what it's going on here. you will build another big thing that will be half empty in the market will take a hit. >> thank you. >> thank you for your comment. >> my name is richard becker. i'm a local coordinator. it should be a national holiday. i would hope that the board, today is not going to pass a resolution declining the treatment of children along the border, and then vote in favor of this building. [applause] you know, if you travelled down -- i lived in the mission for 37 years. we are very close. i live a couple blocks away. when you travel down mission street now, there are scores, at least 60 or 70 shut down businesses, interspersed

with the expensive restaurants. that's what this form of development has brought about. and is not only that, the soaring rents, the number of people who are homeless, you know, we hear that we are supposed to combat the blue wave to rescue us from this despicable administration in washington. but the blue wave swept over san francisco many, many years ago. it swept over the state of california too. and yet we have soaring rents, and more and more homeless people every week. people are being driven out of their homes. you know, robert tillman says he will see you if you vote in favor of this appeal. you have a whole battery of attorneys here, and they can defend you. but you need to defend the people of san francisco and the people of the mission, the children in that center and the people of the city in general. i am a union member. i'm a long-time union support

your. i would appeal to our brothers and sisters here from the construction trades not to go on record in support of this building. we need more housing, but we don't need this project. it is a terrible project. >> supervisor breed: thank you for your comments. before the next speaker i will remind the audience that we recommend -- we welcome your presence here. if you like to show your support, you can use your support of hands. next speaker, please. thank you, manager you can provide your public comment when it is your opportunity. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon. i am a mission resident. i moved to san francisco in 1971 from a small town in california. we moved to san francisco, and my parents worked at my aunt's bakery on 24th street. unit 1977, my parents opened up a bakery on 24th and full sen

send, and it is my obligation here, my obligatory sense of community to come here today and asked -- ask you guys to stop this building, because a community of san francisco's mission district is unique, just ask chinatown and just as fillmore it wasn't just as a hunters point was at one point. and what we are doing, as we are just breaking apart fabric of the city, and in the end, as many have already mentioned, it is going to become homogenized and we will just be another ivory town on the hill. again, san francisco, for me has been a place of culture. we moved here in 71 and we were best to chinatown school. we were late your best to hunter process point. i got to meet a lot of -- a lot

of people in those years of my upbringing. they were black, white, chinese, filipino, korean, city college. i'm a product of city college. i see 24th street in the mission district in general as being whitewashed and gentrified. i don't even have to see -- go further than just gentrification and you understand what's happening to the mission district. please stop this building from being billed and raised, as well as protect the children who are not just in that school, but all schools in the mission. there is the 16th monster, there's a 23rd street and false and building going. it will be over casting the school. there is a lot of stuff that is happening. >> supervisor breed: thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> hello everyone. my name is marcella. i am a citizen. i am an african-american and i want to say that my opinion is

to build this building, i don't support it because i see more buildings like this and other parts of the city, and in the mission district, it's better to not build it, because for one thing, it is a shadow, like it was mentioned. it will disturb the children. it is an opportunity for the kids to have that fun life and it is important for them for their growth. and also in the air. that way we will prevent dust and the shadow. and if it is a building to be kept, to be built, it is better more like a low income building for housing for people who really need it. and also it is best to keep it more as a mission the way it is. i member at those back then they used to be a mission theatre and it is not there anymore. it is good to keep it the way it could be capped