issue. the aclu, the american civil liberties union have written a letter which i have provided you which strongly has opposed, as they have for many, many years, more than ten years, and yet the supervisors have quiet approve this unfortunate, and, for some people may become a disastrous installation. i hope that you will think about that and oppose. >> thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, my name is karen fleshman. i come here tonight as a mom, as a mentor, and as a community

member. if young black women can't be safe in the bay area, where can they be safe. i ask that this body recognize that it is racism that is killing our young people and to work tirelessly to end racism. white people, public officials, new comers to san francisco like myself, tech professionals, ending racism is on us. we must change ourselves and our relationshipst and our spears of influence and use our influences

and hire people of color, stop applying our brilliant to developing some stupid app, and apply it to creating a safe community. supervisors, more police officers will not keep our young people safe. more police officers will lead to more oscar grants, more mario woods, i please with you, do not hire 200 new officers. create the commission supervisor yee called for to study what size police force we need in san francisco. if 50% of our calls are for people in mental health distress, sfpd is not the answer, we need a core of mediators without guns in our community who can deescalate, work with mentally ill people. this is your responsibility.

>> thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> hi, can i have the projection, please. my name the the super girl of san francisco and i am here to talk about nia wilson. i am here because we have been called to action to do something about black lives and brown lives who have been taken by hatred and racism. i, as a person who has lighter skin, is considered caucasian and white is here to speak out. the murder of nia wilson, may

she rest in peace, the power she was denied is unspeakable. it cannot be met with silence. there is a funeral service in oakland on august 3 at 11:00 a.m., and i would ask all of you to attend that service, and furthermore, god has put it on my heart to do something important. i have created something called the unity group. we are going to hold a kneel, stand, and salute to honor the memory of nia wilson being murdered by hate. i will kneel, stand, and salute because her life cannot be silenced and i'm going to go there with other people, and i

am inviting you on august 3 to attend the oakland athletics game on friday night at 6:05:00 p.m. we are going to have candles and a vigil and we will be inside and outside of the stadium. i ask all of you now to come with me in solidarity to tell the media, the radio, social media, don't let her life go unsong and don't let hatred continue to thrive. >> thank you for your comments. >> hello. hello, everyone. my name is roderick coleman, a vetran of the united states army

and i just over came abusing drugs in the tenderloin districts. i came here to let you know that i am in a program called fresh start. it is a program that helps the vet to get help to heal internally inside and has helped me get my life back in order. we would like for someone other than supervisor tang to come and visit our facility. we have a long waiting list after a lot of veterans have heard how this program has helped a lot of veterans, and we would like your support to come out and pay us a visit. we set up a booth for mary breed when she was doing her campaign and we are giving back in ways that we have been taught to give

back, and i feel great to know today that i got my life back in order. supervisor tang, we hope to see you. we have a surprise for you, so we are looking forward to seeing you and your information is with your interns. thank you for your time. i just wanted to share this information with you all. >> my name is amanda, and i live in san francisco and work for the american lung association and am part of the coalition san francisco kid versus big tobacco. i wanted to thank you for passing the ordinance that will end the sale of tobacco products. as you know it was voted on june 5, and 67% of voters saying

yes to proposition e. our coalition has been working to learn more about the implementation of proposition e. this ordinance is set to dpw into effect on july 20, yet from our understanding, there isn't a set timeframe for implementation, so i'm here to let you know about that, and so-to-sato say that we are hoping for switch implementation. >> tom gilber gilberte, the clinic i have been going to is shut down. for our police department, i

want them to retire safe, healthy, and happy, which is a hard thing to do. their own alcoholism rate and divorce rate is real high. recruits from san francisco, i would like that to be a priority. also the rookies after they have graduated training, i would like to see them involved with a team of ten-year veterans that have never fire add bullet, so it becomes a three-person team, and one of those are always without a gun. you can be a good policeman without a gun. we would like to lighten up their belt and if it's for a month, item 65 good. it could be cool to be a policeman. we need to stop shooting things at people. we want the police on our side and we want to be on their side. our democracy right now, how

would you compare it to our global climate? are we as polluted as the skies are? in guatemala from iran, panama, chile, haiti, we have involved ourselves with governments who voted to be represented by their people and we didn't like that and inflicted our dictators on that. here in san francisco -- could they be a drug pusher. wells fargo, they made billions and paid $1 million back in fines. all for greed? [bell ringing] thank you. >> thank you. next speaker.

>> my name is tony and i just wanted to say that prop e is pretty heavy on what it accomplishes. the plague was ended during the renaissance with the combination of nicotine and menthol. we have a lot of parasites around the world right now that have become a lot strong ter since antibiotics were introduced in our foods in the '90e90s and people don't realize that it was a whole way to deliver thing like parasites to the body. no one talks about how things get inside of them and how things were designed to keep that out of you, so removing that from our shelves in the options of things that work for different people's bodies is a serious health consequence that people don't often think of.

a form of tobacco that is used and still is used to keep bugs away. it is great at getting bed bugs away from your bed, very scary parasites that affect the housing industry rely on things like nicotine and menthol. in addition to prop e and the issues created by that, the 24% tax on cannabis has thrown the cannabis commune into array. you have so many different strains used for various purposes from adhd to hormone-like situations, that you would use something like cortisone for are not accessible because of that tax. the u.k. has had am huge problem

with gamma rays and how that has affected the breakdown of cannabis. >> thank you for your comments. next speaker please. >> good evening president cohen, and ladies and gentlemen of the board. since this body is apparently of the opinion that there is no constitutionally significant difference between involuntary medication with antipsychotic medication of outpatient citizen of this city and county and involuntary antipsychotic information of a inmate within a prison. i would like to read you accounts of antipsychotic medication of a patient in context. the first, speaking truth to

power published in volume 20 of the new england journal pages 301-302. indiscernible. once the inmate fails to arrive at the medication line, the nurse or doctor proceeds to this or her cell and an exchange ensues in which the inmate refuses to come out of his cell. at this point a special tactical unit is notified and the unit is locked down and a special team complete with visors and command codes arrives to extract the prisoner from his cell. they forcibly place him against the wall where the medication is administered by injection. [bell ringing] the second is in washington

versus harper. indiscernible. forcing psychotropics also produced -- oh, i am out of time madame clerk. >> thank you for your comments. >> supervisor cohen: thank you is there any other public comment? >> i am requesting information from the rules committee i have am trying to figure out when will the rules committee have a hearing or whatever they do regarding the shelter monitoring committees quarterly report. i guess my other situation is, the protections in the shelters systems are so weak over the

past two to three years of me actually going to a shelter. i has been excessively abused and i am at the point with my situation with the shelters, that i would not recommend going to the shelter system and i have been a victim of violence between staff and the clients and it seems like nobody is trying to do anything to make any of these things better. i mean, i believe i have been to the local homeless coordinating board and the shelter monitoring committee, and it seems like there is no political wheel to make these shelters safe from the violence that i have received. it also seemed like there has been excessive and numerous contract violations and policy and procedure violations, and it seems like it gets swept under

the rug like nobody is caring whether or not the contracts are being followed. [bell ringing] i am at the point where i believe the local homeless board is overtly and maliciously bigoted against the homeless. it just seems like they are just -- i have lost any and all faith in the local coordinating homeless board to do anything but protect the service providers. >> thank you for your comments. >> supervisor cohen: any other members of the public that would like to speak? seeing none public comment is closed. thank you. madame clerk. i believe the next item is item 69. would you please call it. >> item 69 is a resolution to

support california state proposition 10, the affordable housing act on the november 6, 2018 ballot. >> supervisor cohen: supervisor tang. >> supervisor tang: , i was asking if we could sever item 69. >> of course. >> and we have just called it madame president. >> supervisor cohen: i know. >> supervisor tang: i was just asking if we could continue this given recess. >> supervisor cohen: madame clerk when is the next board meeting? >> clerk: september 4. >> supervisor cohen: septembese. i would like to acknowledge the house has changed. madame clerk do we need a role call vote?

>> clerk: yes. [roll call] >> supervisor mandelman: i have a question. >. what is the reason to continue it. >> supervisor tang: she doesn't need one. >> supervisor peskin: if i may, matters on the adopt with that committee reference calendar except for motions, resolutions require a unanimous vote. if there is not, it goes to committee, so a continuance is a polite way to then have a vote at the next meeting, but that requires eight votes. aye. [laughter] >> thank you you. [roll call]

there are 10ayes. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. next item please. clerk io time 70. [ reading item 70] >> supervisor peskin: thank you madame president and i want to thank the clerk for preparing the appropriate amendments before everybody and i would like to move them and add one more, which is based on our earlier action today where in the t. n. c. gross receipts tax wasn't submitted to the ballot and i would like to strike the words online 22 to page 23 at

line eight and then adopt the other amendments as presented by the clerk. >> supervisor cohen: i would like to modify the language. it should read cannabis business tax. >> clerk: which page? >> supervisor cohen: i believe it is on page -- it starts on page three madame clerk. i am looking for the exact line. i am looking at the amendments you circulated for us, so amendment e, it just says initiative ordinance cannabis tax. i have want to change it to

cannabis business tax. >> i believe it does in the legislation. >> supervisor cohen: that is right i just wanted to make sure we were consistent. >> supervisor cohen: supervisor peskin made a motion, is there a second. second bysym by supervisor fewer. can we take the amendments without objection? we can take the amendments without exception. the motions are amended. without objection the motion is approved as amended. madame clerk, is there any other business? >> clerk: yes, today's meeting willing adjourn on behalf of the late ms. mercedes rouis, for the

late phillip scott ryan, and for the late mr. gus constantinutus. >> supervisor cohen: thank you very much. i want to bring to your attention by legislative aid britney, today is her last day and she is going on maternity leave, and she and her husband are expecting their first child. she has been a delight to spar with intellectually. we haven't seen eye-to-eye on a few things but for the most part have enjoyed each other and i want to thank her for her thoughtfulness and incredible ability to give shade. she was the most impeccable dressed woman in my office. if you see her between now and

the next five minutes, please thank her. britney, i wanted to say thank you on behalf of the city of san francisco for your time and also for your talent. thank you, ladies and gentlemen, we are adjourned. [gavel] [meeting adjourned]

. eting adjourned] >> all right. let's get started. the meeting will come to order. this is the regular meeting of the vision zero committee meeting for tuesday, july 31,

2018. i am supervisor -- i guess i'm a commissioner. i'm commissioner norman yee, and i will be chairing today's meeting. i am joined by commissioner aaron peskin and commissioner kathrin stefani will be joining us in a few minutes. the committee clerk is albertoquintanilla, and the staff would also like to acknowledge the staff of sfgov tv who record each of our meeting and make the recordings available on-line. mr. clerk, do you have any announcements? >> clerk: no announcements. >> supervisor yee: okay. we have to silence our phones or anything? our cell phones?

before i call the first item, i want to say a few words. the vision zero of the transportation committee meets quarterly, but recently, there's been a gap of -- with meetings, so i'm happy to be back on track for the new fiscal year, and hopefully, we'll just get back into our quarterly meetings and be a lot more productive in the coming years -- or coming months. then, vision zero's not about bulb outs and red curbs. vision zero is about, really, people in this case. all san francisco residents and visitors have the right to transverse our city safely as a pedestrian, a bicyclist, a motorist or on public transit. i look forward to the updates that's going to be presented this -- this morning in our

future meetings, also, and want to ensure that actions -- action items will be presented in the future. today, we won't have any action items, but i think we're going to try to start moving into a direction where we actually, in this committee, look at what possibilities there are to move agendas. so mr. clerk, please call item number one. >> clerk: item one, roll call. commissioner peskin? >> supervisor peskin: present. >> clerk: commissioner peskin present. commission stefani? stefani absent. commissioner yee? >> supervisor yee: present. >> clerk: commissioner yee present. we have a quorum. >> supervisor yee: there doesn't need to be a motion on roll call? >> clerk: no. >> supervisor yee: i didn't think so. so call number two.

>> clerk: number two is approve the minutes of the last meeting. >> supervisor peskin: pursuant to public comment, i would move to approve the comments of the april 22 meeting? >> supervisor yee: okay. is there any public comment on the minutes? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> clerk: the roll call for the first action item. >> supervisor peskin: we can do that in committee, but i guess under the rules of the state of california by -- >> supervisor yee: i will do that to make the state happy. roll call, then. >> clerk: yes. on item 2, commissioner peskin. >> supervisor peskin: aye. >> clerk: peskin aye. yee? >> supervisor yee: aye. >> clerk: yee aye. we have approval. >> supervisor yee: can we call

item three? >> clerk: item three is information item. >> supervisor yee: okay. we will have a presentation. >> good morning, commissioners. thank you for having us. i'm hava cronenberg. commissioner yee, i think it's been about nine months since we were here, so i'm going to go through beliefly some of our current statistics about vision zero and the progress we've made on our current action trot gee. very high overview. i know we have a packed agenda, so i'm going to move quickly. we report to you, as well as our committee -- community and

committee vision zero task force, which has been meeting quarterly quarterly. i know you've seen this slide, but this is our fatality report from 2017, which was our least deadly year in san francisco recorded history, with 20 fatalities. pedestrians of those fatalities were still overrepresented, so we have a downward trend. motorists still continue to be overrepresented, and bicyclists as well. just looking through midway through this current calendar year, we're continuing to trend lower on average, but we still have eight recorded fatalities this year.

we're hoping to see a downward trend as the year continues. really important, and again, thank you, commissioner yee, for calling our hearing about older adult seniors, pedestrians, people we always see overrepresented in our fatales are older people in san francisco because they are less likely to survive a crash. we continue to see trends on the highway industry next work, which is the very high number of streets, 13% of our streets that represent 75% of our fatales and severe injuries. so just to talk about some of the highlights of our safe streets program, there's going to be really great, stunning pictures come up. we had over 500 measures installed in 2017 citywide to improve safety, so that can include refreshing a crosswalk or installing a signal. and on the linear side, 56 new

miles of safety treatments citywide, and 20 specifically on the high injury network, so we're doing work both citywide and addressing our most critical streets. so these are going to be alphabetical. here, we have 7th, which now has a great protected bike facility. 8th, which had two different phases, both of which are now complete to construct a protected bike facility. turk was a tremendous win in the tenderloin. we've had some really great feedback from our police department as well as our community, so the current senior center has written letters of thanks. this is working -- this street is now working better for everybody for all sorts of reasons. down in our outer neighborhoods, new speed humps, new safety areas for people who are getting into the park in

mclaren, upper market, which is one of our new bike routes, we're continue to look at loading as we work with the merchants on market. diverter on scott street, refreshed paint, refreshed crosswalks, and this was a collaboration with the public utilities commission, so we also have stormwater infrastructure. coming up, now a ten-year-old project, masonic, which is fully green, tremendous improvement for streets that had some tragic fatalities on it years prior, and we hope to see a large improvement and positive feedback from the neighbors on this project. looking ahead, so currently where we're working here in 2018, we still have a -- 13

miles of improvements planned in the hyde street corridor. i think that shows your strong commitment and our city's strong commitment to this program. how did we pick these projects that are coming up? it's really the focus again, on that high injury network. we're building on the planning efforts completed by the planning department, the transportation authority, and our own group how we're pivoting to the next step for projects. we don't just build something, we hope there's been a strong planning effort prior. we're working both end quarter levels s levels and in areas. so currently we have a community based transportation plan starting in the bayview to hear more from that community in terms of what they're interested in seeing in terms of safety mobility and all

improvements. and as we do install legislate long-term quarter projects, our goal is to immediately put in safety projects commendsurrate. the real goal about vision zero is to think synergistically how we have all those other goals. how do we address vulnerable populations in particular. are we ensuring we have work at the citywide level, are we being responsive to the kind of constituent requests that we're hearing? for instance, resiliency is something that's now really important, as we see the effects of climate change, so how are we thinking about safety and making our street ready for sea level rise at the

same time. and lastly, incredibly important is affordability. so we're partnering with housing grant to have commensurate street projects go in. our education and enforcement programs, i hope you've all seen these bright yellow signs up everywhere. the district attorney did speak at our last meeting a week ago, so we now have a program on senior safety from the district attorney's office? we've been working hard with the motorcyclist's community because they're overrepresented in our deaths. recently won an award is our campaign on motorcycle safety? additionally we have a distracted driving campaign which is supported by our traffic company? we have a street team which i hope you've seen at sunday streets or any other community

fair or event that are in your neighborhood, but it's engaging people on the topic of vision zero and asking citizens to just think about how streets are in their neighborhood and what they can be doing to contribute to the safety of that street? and they've reached thousands and thousands of san franciscans. on our data systems side, very nerdy, but very important. we continue to refine the collision data that we're getting, and we continue to be nationally noticed in this area. i hope to embarrass my colleague megan weir. she presented at a federal function about the safety data that we collected especially since we joined our hospital and collected data from our hospital about injuries? important to you as commissioners and the supervisors, we need to pursue a legislative agenda in addition to all the work we do here in the city and county because we have goals that we cannot do without some changes to our legislation, and so unfortunately, i think most of us know that we weren't able to pursue the automated speed

enforcement in the assembly in our last session. there are some priorities that include the vision zero task force, and we're hoping that we can use all these new efforts as new bills get submitted in january to spring board or speed enforcement campaign in addition to any other legislation that we see as a city is important for us to pursue our vision zero goals. so that is very brief. any questions? i know that we have a lot of speakers behind me, so i don't want to take up too much of their time. >> supervisor yee: i guess, just going back to the automated speed enforcement piece, what kind of new strategies have we been thinking about to actually, you know, have a change of direction with the state

legislation? >> i think we're definitely going to take the feedback we got about where this was opposition? i think a strategy we've talked about sort of broadly is how do we work with the committee members and family in those committee members' districts who have the ability to vote up or down on the speed enforcement campaign? i don't think we've quite put the full strategy together and i'm hopeful to work with you and your office and our legislative team to help fo formulate that? i'm going to say it's not quite there yet and we're taking input on that as we speak. >> supervisor yee: we would love to be active on that effort and hopefully, we're reaching out to families for safe streets to be part of that strategy. >> yes, definitely. >> supervisor yee: okay. thank you. any other questions? okay. next presenter. >> thank you very much. >> clerk: item four, highlights. >> supervisor yee: oh. >> clerk: sorry.

public comment. >> supervisor yee: this is part of item three, i think. >> clerk: excuse me. >> supervisor yee: good morning, commander. >> hi. i always need help with these things. all right. from our last meeting, there's a -- there were questions about the causes of the collisions as well as the times, and so we looked at -- at those -- those things and came up with some numbers for 2014 and 2018, and

if we can get the slide up. i mean, you look at this slide, we combined some of the vehicle code violations into -- into one, and i can give you those if you'd like. we broke it down into miscellaneous. there were four collisions under vision zero foreseen i don't remembers, one was unsafe backing, one was on the wrong side of the road, bicycle riding against traffic and then being hit by a vehicle, and then a solo vehicle collision, unsafe turn and collided with a parked vehicle. that would be the miscellaneous side. and then, we have two d.u.i.'s, driving under the influence, five red light violations, one speeding violation. and then, pedestrian in the road way, there were nine.

and then, failure to yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk. the thing that was very glaringly obvious to us in talking with my investigators was the amount of seniors that were in crosswalks that were contacted. they told me when they looked at the cases -- and there's a significant amount -- there's 44 cases between 2014 and 2018, but the one thing that was obvious to them was the left -- left-hand turn, which has always been a conversation with the vision zero partnerships, is that that has been one of the larger causes of these collisions, and so concentrating and looking at that is important. and then, i added fatalities by age groups. so the range, we broke it into 65 years and older. there are 13, 70 years and

older, 16; 80, 14; and then, 90, 1. and then, females are 20 victims, and males, 24. and then, the time comparison that -- that the supervisors requested, this is the breakdown. obviously, after midnight, there aren't a lot of collisions. i believe there's just one, but it's obvious that at 13, between 9:00 in the morning and 12:00, and then, 12:00 to 3:00 in the afternoon is the peak time that these occur. >> supervisor yee: just curious, for these -- these during the daytimes, do you know if the seniors, where -- where they were going or coming from? >> we try to look into that from looking into the cases

from 2017 to 2018. those aren't questions we routinely ask, and so that would be a very intense -- we'd have to call a lot of the victims' family members to find that out, but we don't do that in the course of the investigation. it also pertains to the investigation itself. >> supervisor yee: i imagine it's pretty difficult, too. i know, for instance, that one of them that happened recently on ocean, the woman was actually -- it was around this time -- was going to do her laundry, so -- >> yeah. no, the gentleman was going on his daily walk. we know that from home. as far as investigations go, i also wanted to give you the numbers for noncriminal versus criminal cases that we are looking at. 41% of the 44 cases are noncriminal, and the criminal is about 59% that we've

actually gone criminal and submitted to the d.a.'s office for prosecution. >> supervisor yee: and how many of these criminal cases were hit and run? >> hit and run? you know, the only -- what i saw was two. >> supervisor yee: only two? >> yeah. the pedi cab was one, on embarcadero. >> supervisor yee: yeah. i have a question to presenters. is there anybody actually presenting on item four for the seniors? because it seems like we're heading these -- the notes, any ways. i don't know who's presenting. >> good morning, commissioner yee.

we had planned for item number four to have commander euens present on the known statics followed by a presentation on the hawk, and then i was going to present a couple slides representing the overview of the hearing. >> supervisor yee: sure. i realize we're hearing some of the information. >> i apologize. we should have had a more formal introduction. >> supervisor yee: yeah. was anybody else -- >> actually, we are planning on turn it over to caltrans for specific questions on the hawk. >> supervisor yee: we're on item three right now. >> we're on item four. >> supervisor yee: so anybody else presenting on item three? okay. then, is there any public comments on item three. all right. item three is now closed. please call item four. >> clerk: item four, highlights from board of

supervisors meeting on senior injuries and fatalities, and recommended improvements. this is information item. >> supervisor yee: come back here. >> good morning again, commissioners. my name is megan weir, and we'll just present a brief recap of our hearing on senior pedestrian safety that we had last week. thank you, again, for -- to commissioner yee for calling the hearing and bringing attention to this important issue. in the hearing, we briefly

provided an overview of our multiagency -- thank you -- collaboration and approach to addressing senior injuries and deaths in san francisco, including work by the department of public health to monitor senior injuries, our outreach to seniors, as well as sfmta. our district attorney's office targeted safety campaign. our police department spoke with respect to enforcement, and also, our interagency coordinated responses to fatalities, both the rapid response addressing injuries and the crisis response, which is an agenda item today, so i'm not going to cover that in this presentation because my colleague will be going into that in depth. briefly, from the department of public health, our safety streets for seniors campaign focuses on education outreach to seniors and services providing services to seniors and have reached over 1300

seniors to date at 40 locations. i wanted to highlight there's currently an r.f.a. out. an important piece of this multilingual community based initiative is providing grants to seniors serving c.b.o.'s and there's an r.f.a. out right now for another two years of grants to those awardees. we also highlighted a map that my team recently completed, looking at locations where seniors, as well as people with disabilities are injured, overlaid with attractors that senior particularly travel to which included senior centers, libraries, a paratransit locations as well as areas with high densities of senior injuries. we are excited to share this work to inform a proactive approach to prioritizing investments for seniors. we also talked about sfmta's

recent policy change to increase senior pedestrian crossing time citywide and this was in response to a lot of the safe streets for seniors advocates who really helped elevate this issue to the city to helped proactively address signals city -- crossing at signals citywide moving forward. we will be evolving the traffic calming program to address some other locations, including a lot more community engagement. and finally, really, the seniors are the most disproportionately impacted population for vision zero, particularly pedestrians, so through our education and

communication campaigns, how can we raise senior visibility and we're really excited about our senior safety campaign. at the hearing, we also heard a lot from our community stakeholders, including the youth commission, walk san francisco, our senior c.b.o.s that are working in soma, and chinatown, and we look forward to continuing to advance that work in the coming years. >> supervisor yee: so in the other presentation by the commander, she mentioned that there's the issue of the left-hand turns. is there -- are we -- do we have any plans to address that? i mean, now that there seems to be some data to support that it is a problem. >> i'm so excited that you

brought that up. john nexway is leading an education campaign that's going to be focusing specifically on left-hand turns and working with our team at the department of public health on data analysis as well as behavioral psychologists to really take a deeper dive, you know, into what -- what happens with respect to left-hand turns and how vision zero can more proactively address that and i'll look to him to see if he has anything else he wants to ad. yeah, i'm -- add. yeah, i'm sure he'd be happy to answer any questions. >> supervisor yee: tell me about the education piece on this. >> the shore answer is we don't know yet, so we are convening a group of experts in september to look at how we can best communicate with this. what we do know is left turns are not simply a function of people not understanding the rules of the road but there's a

lot going on related to making a left turn. people's sense of self-preservation. the brain often focuses much more on the perceived threats or concerns than let's say the pedestrians who we are obviously very concerned about but our brains can filter that out. so we're looking at how we can communicate and make changes in the environment to address that. but we haven't developed a specific campaign that we'll be rolling out yet. we'll be back later in the fall with a clearer idea of how we're moving forward. >> supervisor yee: so i'm assuming that the focus is on the drivers. >> yes. i -- i would say that the main focus is on drivers, but we are remaining open to -- we're clearly not going to do something that's going to make it difficult to cross the street, but if there are anything that come out of our

analysis that help keep people safe, we would certainly not be closed to the idea of talking to pedestrians, as well. >> supervisor yee: in regards to the -- those incidents, the collisions with the left-hand turns, do we know whether or not these are basically small streets turning into larger streets or larger streets turning into larger streets? and the reason i ask is that if -- if it's the more than two lanes going in each direction, streets that are of concern, that it seems the logical thing to do is put more no left-hand turns or have a left-hand turn signal there. i know it's harder for those sort of residential streets with those left-hand turns because of the -- it probably

doesn't make too much sense. so do we know whether or not, in these collisions, where they occurred? >> not -- not yet. we haven't gotten to that level of analysis of those collisions, but that will be something we'll be looking at. we'll also be going out to some of the higher impact level of intersections and watch what's happening, besides the behavior, what is happening on those -- in terms of the design, absolutely. so next time we're back here, hopefully, we will be able to answer that question. >> supervisor yee: yeah. i personally think those no left-hand turn signals are effective. >> yeah. >> supervisor yee: be only to the drivers but also to the pedestrians. they seem to understand that when this is green, when there's a turn, they don't cross. >> yes. >> supervisor yee: okay. thank you very much. >> thank you.

>> supervisor yee: in regards to -- i really appreciate the -- the effort of extending the pedestrian walk time. how are we doing that? are we focusing on particular intersections or are we going to eventually make this universal for san francisco? >> i'm going to ask ricardo oleja who is implementing that to come up and speak to that issue. >> good morning, commissioners. >> supervisor yee: good morning. >> yes, we are in the process of updating our crossing times for pedestrians. this is the time that the pedestrian count down signal uses to display the pedestrians, and it gives us the current time of 3.5 feet percrossing persecond, and we'll be using a 3 feet

persecond. >> supervisor yee: this is for all of san francisco? >> yes. currently, federal guidelines allow that on a case by case basis, but we decided since san francisco has a senior population present at many intersections, we didn't want to make that distinction, so we're gradually going to be doing that all over the city. >> supervisor yee: and how long will that take to complete? >> when we went from 4 feet persecond to 3.5 feet persecond, that took about eight years, so that was at a time when we weren't doing as much signal timing. i think we'll be able to do that quicker, because we're doing the downtown area as a well, which includes the western addition, north of market, and south of market, which is already about a third of our system. we're working on implementing that change, and looking at major corridors like geary boulevard to change that, and we are doing that on ocean boulevard and other sensitive

vision zero corridors. we'll be able to get there quicker, but i don't have a timeline because it somewhat depends on staff resources and how many intersections are we touching? because each time we touch an intersection, i will make those changes. >> supervisor yee: when can we get a timeline? i know you're saying it depends on the resources. for the resources that we have now, what is the timeline? and then, if we can get additional resources to speed it up. i mean, i won't know if it's worth trying to get additional resources without knowing it's capable -- not you, but if an agency's capable of doing at this point. so with the current resources, how long would it take approximately, do you know? >> i don't know. we haven't really planned it out. the policy was just adopted, and like i said, the main goal

was to focus on the high impact corridors first and -- and establish a policy so that all future signal retimings would be done. we did not establish a formal program that would retime the city by a particular year, but based on your request, we can take a look to see what is a current timeline based on some realistic resources and what could we do if we reallocated resources for that project. >> supervisor yee: so the next meeting for this committee is three months, i think that's plenty of time. >> yeah. >> supervisor yee: and if we could speed it up if there's some additional resources to -- that would help speed it up substantially, i think it's worth looking into. is that right, miss chen? can