that is done, and i in this moment don't have that subtly. >> supervisor safai: i just wanted to know what you mean by tweak the e.i.r. >> no, i didn't mean tweak the e.i.r. we need to approve it, and start the housing or we need to disapprove it and keep the balance of housing in the e.i.r. >> supervisor safai: i don't have any other questions. thank you, commissioner. i'll just say some of the things that we talked about on the record. one of the things that i'm interested in having a conversation about with the planning commission, for the record, is we've been advancing the conversation about accessory dwelling units. i think there was some misunderstanding in the public or not whether going forward, a new construction that maybe did not have any demolition, we could add accessory dwelling units. i spoke with commissioner moore and commissioner richards. they said they were open to that conversation going forward, so i think we're going to bring that back up because

thinking about the opportunity to add density where there is new introduction but not incentivizing any way demolition i think is an important conversation to have. another thing we talked about was what supervisor yee and supervisor stefani talked about in terms of process improvements and how you balance the respect of neighborhoods and neighborhood process and moving forward. i think there's an overarching question and i'll just say for the record i think this is something that the planning commission is dealing with on a daily basis. we have a number of units that are entitled, they've pulled permits. they're in the process of being developed. there's a whole host that have not even begun to pull permits. why, we need to understand that, but at the same time, there's a question of our population is growing.

we are the most rapidly growing city in the united states, but we are bound on three sides by water and an additional county and city. we are confronted by conversations about height and character and neighborhood preservation along with this issue of density, so there is a general question about what is the proper number for san francisco and at the rate and what is the proper rate of growth and balancing that history? but i will say, you know, given the history of the city, when we started out as a city of 10,000 by 1848, and then by 1849, we were pushing 60,000. the rate of change in the gold rush was very different than it was today, but it's very similar. i think the commissioners do a good job in keeping that in mind and balancing it out. i appreciate the comments and questions and thoughtful comments. and all the public that have come out to comment on questions one and two shows the level of support and the

importance of this commission and the importance the role these commissioners play. so any additional comments from commissioners on these items -- i mean, excuse me from supervisors, colleagues? sorry. committee members. okay. so entertain a motion, then. supervisor stefani? >> supervisor stefani: yes. i'd like to approve supervisor yee's nomination for dense i say richard for a four-year term ending july 31, 2022, and approve supervisor fewer's nomination for kathrin moore

for a four term ending july 31, 2022. >> supervisor safai: can we do that without objection? without objection, that matter is sent to the full board of supervisors. please call item three -- oh, maybe we can do three and four together. >> clerk: just to clarify, item one and two have been amended to approve the appointment, and those are forwarded to the full task force with recommendation. item number three is it a motion approving, rejecting the mayor's nomination of the appointment of rodney fong to the planning department for a term ending july 31, 2022, item four is a motion approving, rejecting the mayor's nomination of the appointment of milicent johnson to the

planning department for a term ending july 31, 2022. >> supervisor safai: commissioner fong, please come forward. >> president fong: good afternoon, supervisors. i won't take much of your time, but i think the conversation we just had was a fascinating one, and needs to continue beyond the confirmation appointment. i think the questions you asked are the questions we asked. it's been discussed, balance, some art, some science of how to shape the city going forward. i'm a fifth generation san franciscan. i hate when people say that -- >> supervisor safai: why do you hate it when they say that? they throw that out there? >> president fong: they throw it out there. but my house, and in yours, i'm dealing with young kids, college kids, i'm dealing with people ageing in place, and

we're all dealing with this question, how are our kids going to afford to live in this darn question. my focus on the commission in the last eight years has been future forward, in asking those questions. the questions about you supervisors, what does the future look like? what does it hold? how do we build more housing on top of transit? the topic of transit hasn't come up today, but i think that's a significant piece of solving how large cities continue to grow. i think it's a regional piece. there's job creation in san francisco, but there's still little housing built outside of san francisco, and i think it's incumbent on us to come together regionally to speak with other mayors in other cities to see how we solve this as an area. i seek your reappointment. it's been a pleasure and honor to serve this. i understand the power and

responsibility of this seat and take every single vote with great thought, thinking about who's involved, who it affects, and while i'd like to say sometimes it's a science, it is certainly human compassion that plays a large role in making decisions on a weekly basis. >> supervisor safai: thank you, commissioner. we'll call you back up when we have questions. we'll allow commissioner johnson, thank you. >> commissioner johnson: good afternoon, chair safai, supervisors stefani and yee. thank you so much for hearing me today. i am incredibly honored to have been renominated by the mayor to the san francisco planning commission, and i am excited to express my qualifications and desire to serve. i was just here a few months

ago, but i think it's important for members of the public to hear my story. my passion for public service is inspired by my family and specifically my mother who worked hard to give me the best of everything, even when it was hard to make ends meet. she believed that getting a good education was the best gift she could give me, so when it came time to give me the gift of school, she did her research and moved just a few blocks away where the best school was. it was in that moment where i decided that i wanted to find ways to make sure that everyone who live s in cities has the opportunities that my mother worked hard to give me. a few career highlights, in college, i majored in social justice studies is did my senior thesis on the legacy of red lining and discrimination

and interned at the national housing coalition. my first job out of college was running an asset development program, helping low-income people realize their dream of home ownership. i chaired several interagency working groups on housing enforcement, code enforcement and land use policies. this is where i came to understand the planning process including my share of eight to ten hour public meetings and where i deepened my commitment to building opportunity rich and resilient communities. i came to california in the height of the foreclosure crisis to work for an organize called the green lining institution, and i talked with organizations. i brokered several community reinvestment agreements between financial institutions and those communities and brought together all members of our community from elected officials to the provide sector to the nonprofit sec to have to create win-win partnerships

that invested in and supported the resiliency of those communities. i worked with tipping point community to reunite the private sector to do good in our community and sit them around the table with our city's nonprofit leaders to facilitate partnerships that would address our city's twin challenges of housing affordability and homelessness. i built my career on that. as an african american, a renter, someone who hopes to have a family in the city one day, and a person who has dedicated my career to working in the nonprofit and public secto sectors, i bring a unique complementary perpeculiartispe the commission. i take great joy in rolling up my sleeves and doing homework, proactively engaging city staff, planning staff, project

sponsors and community members and working hard to come to the most thoughtful and balanced determinations. i have been committed to being an open and accessible commissioner because i believe that the solutions to our most challenging problems lie at the intersection of these different stakeholder groups, and i'm committed to developing housing for people of all income levels, focus on expanding our affordable housing stock, and where needed working to build bridges between project support ors, community groups and city agencies to strengthen our collective work and the fabric of our community. it is ultimately my mission to work alongside you and all of our colleagues to do everything we can to create the conditions in which people of all backgrounds and income levels have the opportunities to live, work, and thrive in our beautiful city. and so i humbly ask for your support in my reappointment to the planning commission. before i close, i just want to note that i submitted for the

record a letter in support from tipping point community. i also just want to thank those that have come out to speak on all of our behalves, and to say that i fully support all of my commissioners. it has been a pleasure and honor to work with them. there is a level of integrity and professionalism that i really appreciate, and even if we don't always agree, i know that we will work together, one, to benefit the city, and two to push each other to come to the movst balanced and thoughtful determinations possible. so i fully support them. thank you, and i'm here to answer any questions you might have for me. >> supervisor safai: thank you. commissioner yee? >> supervisor yee: so i think you heard me questions, and i'll try to repeat it. the first one's pretty straightforward. what's your views on neighborhood input in the planning improvement processes? >> commissioner johnson: yes. so you know, i'm fortunate to be the newest member of the planning commission. and so i'm looking at everything with fresh eyes. so for example, when the

mayor's process improvements came before the commission, i was simply able to kind of take a step back and take a moment and say, you know, can you walk us through the moment from when someone applies for preapplication to the moment when we actually sign off and approve their permit, what does the process look like? and little by little as the department began to describe what that looked like, we were able to notice moments where there might be 30-days or 60 days where, you know, a permit might just sit there as we do noticing and other types of things. i think there is a lot we can do internally to improve our processes and figure out how we can amend them to expedite the process. >> supervisor yee: okay. which really answers my second question, which is about streamlining the processes. and i know we had the

discussion already in my office about family friendly housing, meaning families with children. >> commissioner johnson: yes. >> supervisor yee: would you be able to work with your fellow commissioners? >> commissioner johnson: yes. this is something that i shared with you. in my background as a community organizer, i think i've learned two important lessons, which is to define the change you're trying to make in the world, and to be clear about what it's going to take to get there. i think we need better definitions for family housing that take a holistic approach, not only the size and numbers, but making sure they have access to parks, to transit, to libraries, and quality schools. i think better confining definitions like that extends to things like affordable housing. we know that affordable housing means different things to different communities, including communities that have been traditionally left out of

the economic mainstream, making sure we know what we mean by affordable housing, and making sure that folks have access to community serving retail, possible transit, so i'm fully committed to working along with my colleagues to better defining family housing in particular. >> supervisor yee: thank you for your answer. and i have the same questions for commissioner fong, but maybe you have questions. >> supervisor stefani: thank you. it's good to see you again. i know we spoke when you were first up for appointment, and at mayor breed's inauguration, so it's good to see you. i was just thinking about something in terms of zoning in our merchant corridors and having walkable neighborhoods. and i have a lot of seniors in district two, and there are areas where it's difficult for people to get to a grocery store. and we have a grocery store

that recently shutdown. and i -- i just -- when you are considering projects that come before you, i mean, what do you think about in terms of making sure that our neighborhoods are actually walkable? i mean, obviously, there are so many reasons to make our neighborhoods walkable, but what do you think about how you do approach decision making when it comes to making sure that we have access to all types of services and -- in our neighborhoods? >> commissioner johnson: great. thank you for asking that question. that's actually something that's near and dear to my heart. i'm 34 years old, and i don't have a driver's license by choice. i choose to walk everywhere because it's the best way to see the city, and so i think walkability is very important to me. i think we recently had a project in the design district that was being built that was a really interesting kind of p.d.r. mixed space. and they took the extra step of consulting with walk sf and

with the san francisco bike coalition to make sure that the development was actually going to be a benefit to the surrounding community by improving kind of the curb cuts, the walkways, making a very unsafe intersection safe. that's the type of thoughtfulness i think that i look for and that i try to encourage in all of the projects that we see, really, and kind of engaging those stakeholders that can help strengthen projects. so ultimately, when we approve a project, it's something that benefits all of our members of our city. >> supervisor safai: i just want to say for the record, i know i ask a lot of the same questions. you've just been appointed a few months ago, so i think i'm happy to give you an additional term. i know that you've been working hard on the commission. i know that supervisor yee and stefani asked you a lot of different questions, but i think the most important thing is have you enjoyed being on that commission, because i

myself personally, i said this to all of you when i met with you. i mean, we have long meetings here, but i don't -- they pale in comparison to the time you all have to sit in committee meetings. it's a true test of stamina. i mean, we have other obligations also outside of our tuesday meeting, but the preparation that you all put in, it's commendable, so i want to say that to all of the commissioners. and i said that to you privately, so thank you. i don't have any additional questions, and same thing for our fifth generation president fong. so i think that there's been a lot of time and effort put into these conversations, and the questions that we've had. we met -- i think it's really important, and i'll just say it again for the record. i think it's really important to be thinking about how you balance this desire for moving into the future with additional units in demand and preserving what makes san francisco so

special. >> supervisor yee: so i was going to ask commissioner fong the same questions. >> supervisor safai: oh, okay. great. >> president fong: i think there are some road blocks. i think there are some opposition groups that don't want to see the same thing necessarily. i think there are some economic things that are happening, construction cost, land parcel costs play a part in why we have so many projects that are entitled but not being built, and i think you are going to continue to see that until construction prices start to drop some. with that, i think there are some opportunities for us in particular, sites that have owned the property for a long time, and that includes some of the city sites where the land basis is low, and you can spread out the construction over time. but if someone's paid top

dollar in the last 24 months and wants to try to pay price persquare foot to build, that is a difficult performance to reach. i think anybody will argue, if you look at the math and you look at the performance, it's difficult. the challenge is if you press that, and you add the affordable housing piece, the mandatory housing piece, what happens is the mandatory units meet the threshold of the affordable housing piece. in addition, design begins to suffer, and you end up with less than top quality projects. so i don't know the answer to your question, i'm not sure if that's exactly the answer to your question, but efficiency in trying to expedite as much housing is important, and no crystal ball or silver bullet to that, but would love to continue those conversations with the housing commission, the planning commission, and the board of supervisors. >> supervisor yee: it's really interesting that looking at

the -- what are the issues as the laying some projects, and you spoke about a few of those reasons. and then, but what i've seen more legislatively in the recent year or so is to look at the external piece of the neighborhood's always complaining or the delaying of the projects, so let's eliminate the amount of opportunities or time they could actually appeal to -- or to provide input into a project. yes, maybe there's some of that, but there's very little that's looking at well, there, you have entitlement already. and projects have been sitting there over ten years, so the excuse that, you know, why didn't they get started ten

years ago when construction was -- wasn't that expensive? and what about these vacancies? so those are good answers to me, that we also need to look at those issues when it comes to the housing crisis that we're facing. >> president fong: and i think it would be a good time. when i first came on the commission eight years ago, the mayor had asked to take a look at all the projects that were entitled or weren't building and started construction, and look at them and categorize them, why they didn't start. was it an economic problem, was it a finance problem? i think it would be a fair time to look at those projects that we've entitled and look at why they struggled. >> supervisor yee: so did you look at them a few years back. do you have the results. >> president fong: i'm sure we have them. >> supervisor yee: can you get us a copy. >> president fong: yes. >> supervisor yee: and the other question i asked was

about family housing. would you agree to push for some universal definition we can all agree on? >> president fong: absolutely. i think the under lying idea is to keep san franciscans in san francisco. that's a multifold answer that has to do with school, with getting your first choice school near your neighborhood. that's affordability, that's how far you have to drive to your work. many people live in san francisco but work outside, and that just eats into expenses and family time. so as far as defining that, yes, i'd be, obviously, part of a discussion to help build that sector of housing. >> supervisor yee: okay. thank you very much. >> supervisor safai: great. we'll call you back up if there's any additional questions, but any member of the public wishing to comment on item 3 and 4, please come forward. >> clerk: one minute? >> supervisor safai: yes. do the same time as before. >> commissioner richards: i just wanted to chime in here.

i know i should have spoken for commissioner moore, as well. i think the commission is functioning really well, and i think that commissioner fong and johnson really add to that clo colorful debate. commissioner johnson has only been four months, but we have some great conversations. commissioner fong is going to be in his ninth year. he brings that experience with him, that gravitas with him. he's a great calming influence. i absolutely hope that you support the renominations. >> good afternoon. my name is alex lofton. i'm here to speak on behalf of the nomination of milicent johnson. i know commissioner johnson from our work together on projects related to the future of work here in the bay area as well as working on housing issues for all in the bay area.

i actually rush an organization that's focused on helping middle class afford home ownership in the bay area. why milicent? one as a fellow operator in the space? i've seen her approach as being balanced, fair, and compassionate, and her approach to life is one that acts with integrity at all times, and that's one that i want working for me, and she brings that and more to this board. i hope that you reappoint her. thank you. >> supervisor safai: thank you. next speaker. >> greetings, all. my name is shakira simley. i am the acting director of the southeast facility here in the bayview, and i'm here to demonstrate my strong support for commissioner johnson and

her reappointment. [please stand by]

. >> hello, everyone. my name is mara dilley. i'm a neighbor and friend of my i cent johnson, speaking on her behalf today. i think many of her supporters will speak to her racial and social justice and equality. her career has risen up alongside technology and innovation here in san francisco. and her passion for both of

those things, how can we be sure that this rising tide raises all ships, that's what milicent's going to look out for. thank you. >> hello. my name is brian pritchard. i'm glad that there's a fifth generation that's going to be on the board. i support both these people. they bring great opinions to san francisco and to the planning department. thank you very much. >> hello, again, supervisors. joe el koppel, district four resident, here to speak in favor of my fellow commissioners and their moving forward with the reappointment. both of them play vital roles in the commission as a whole, keeping it ethnically diverse, and milicent, the newest commissioner, as me being closest to the newest commission, knows how it is to start off, and i think she's

incredibly on ramped very well and do something but succeed in the future. as well, president fong exudes culturalness. he's very well travelled and forward thinking. thank you. >> lisa ferber from community hill. i just wanted to say a word about milicent johnson. while she's new to the commission, i do think that she does bring a fresh perspective and represents different viewpoints in terms of generational, perhaps, and adds a diversity to the commission. i think she understands that people are behind planning and land use, and i think she's generally respectful to the

neighborhoods. thanks. >> good afternoon. ossie roman with neighborhood council. i just want to support commissioner johnson as the only my lenni on on on only milennial on the commission. we're very supportive. we welcome the fact that we have someone that is going to be representing that generation, and we'll look forward to working with her. thank you. >> hello again. anastasia yanaopolous, district 8 resident in support of

commissioner johnson for reappointment. she's been on the commission a short while, and she's a breath of fresh air. she brings a wealth of experience with the background she's had, dealing with groups, community organizing, and i feel that she's an asset to the commission. commissioner fong brings a balance to this commission, as well. >> good afternoon. todd david, speaking on behalf of myself today. i want to say that i think both of these commissioners do an outstanding job. i really think that it's great that rodney is a parent raising children in the city really brings a perspective that myself as a parent raising children in this city, it's helpful to have a parent. i'd love to see more parents on commissions. when milicent speaks, i feel that everything that i'm thinking comes out in her mouth, and it's so beautiful when she says it. when i say it, it gets all

screwed up. she does a great job of talking about the core values of equity, of making sure that we're building well located housing in all levels of affordable throughout the city, and that we have, you know, people have access to really great housing at all neighborhoods at all levels of affordability, and i really commend that she's taken that message and is driving it home in her short time on the commission, so thanks. >> supervisor safai: thank you. any other members of the public wish to comment on this item, please come forward? seeing none, public comment's closed? [ gavel ]. >> supervisor safai: any additional comments from colleagues? seeing none, can i entertain a motion? oh, sorry. supervisor stefani? >> supervisor stefani: yeah. just want to add, very supportive of commissioner fong who i've known a very long time, and commissioner johnson, who i've met recently and very impressed with both of this records. there's something that cory smith said that struck me, that

i thought was good when he said that because someone's xyz, and he's xyz, that person is the best to represent somebody, and it got me thinking that just because someone is an xyz doesn't mean they weren't once before. so i think it's really important for us to all understand that commissioner richards said that it's really important to work with both sides. if you're not xyz, you need to reach over the aisle and understand xyz. the highest level of empathy requires profound purpose larger that the self-kind of understanding. so i am thinking, when he said that, it just struck me that it's really important to be able to identify with people, but that -- if you -- you have to be able to understand people that are different than yourself, and i hope that our commissioners do that. i think we have a planning commission that does that, and i just want to move forward.

commissioner fong and commissioner johnson, and approve their nomination to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> supervisor safai: great. and can we do that without objection? great. so that is ordered. congratulations again, commissioners. >> clerk: i believe the motion was to amend the motion to remove the rejecting and to refer to the full -- >> supervisor safai: board with positive recommendation, and we're sending both item number one and two and three and four -- >> clerk: there is no need -- >> supervisor safai: it will be automatically on the 31st? >> clerk: yes, it will. >> supervisor safai: okay. great. congratulations. please call item number five. >> clerk: item number five is a motion approving, rejecting the treasurer nomination of ben rosenfield, reeta madhaven, kevin kone, eric sandler and aimee brown, terms ending june 17, 2022 to the treasury over

sight committee. >> supervisor safai: great, and i think we have someone here from the treasurer's office to speak. >> thank you, supervisors. amanda confried from the office of the treasurer's. i'm pleased to announce the most recent appointments to the treasury over sight committee. this is an advisory body to the treasurer, primarily comprised of c.f.o.s from department are oztiare -- or agencies that invest in our commission. this is a body that's created by state law and is active in most counties around california. with your support, we recently updated the authorizing legislation for the committee to clarify the comsignificanpo

we're approving several members at a time. they are appointed as part of their duties as controller or c.f.o. there are coming before you in the future three remaining seats, one representing the community college board and two public members. if you'd consider it, i'd like to ask that you consider -- that you continue the consideration of aimee brown, a public member, so that we can bring both of our public members to committee at the same time, and -- and we are still working with community college to identify an appropriate representative. we are currently accepting applications for the public seats, and members of the public can find the information on the treasurer's website, which is sftreasurer.org. i thank you for your appointment of ben rosenfield, reeta madhaven, kevin kone, and eric sandler. and i will note that not

everyone was able to attend today, but i am happy to speak to their qualifications and we have a few of them here today, if need be. thank you so much. >> supervisor safai: i don't think we need anyone to speak today. that's fine. so what you're asking us to do is you want us to continue aimee brown? that's the only one? >> correct. >> supervisor safai: so you want us to sever that, but otherwise, you want us to move forward the whole package. >> yes. >> supervisor safai: the whole proposal? okay. i'm fine with that. supervisor yee, do you have a question? >> supervisor yee: no. i just needed a clarification, and you asked the same clarification, so i'm fine. >> supervisor safai: okay. so why don't we have a motion to sever aimee brown from the proposed -- >> supervisor yee: i'll move it. >> supervisor safai: so moved. without objection, it's ordered. [ gavel ]. >> supervisor safai: and then, may i have a motion to approve -- >> supervisor yee: i make a motion to approve the nomination of ben rosenfield,

reeta madhaven, kevin kone, and eric sandler to the full board with a positive recommendation? >> supervisor safai: any members of the public wish to comment on this item, please come forward. seeing none, public comment's closed. and can we take that without objection? okay. great. congratulations. thank you. [ gavel ] plea [ gavel ]. >> supervisor safai: please call item number six. [agenda item read] >> supervisor safai: i've been informed that one of the applicants withdrew, so we have one applicant. that's commissioner steven lee, unless i'm misinformed. commissioner lee, please come forward. thank you for your patience.

this is like being in a planning commission meeting. >> i am steven lee, i have not missed a meeting in six years. i actually learned a lot over the years, and with some of the new tools we have to help keep night life vibrant is working. and i enjoy making comments and doing -- my focus is about public safety. even though i'm not a public safety seat, but i do want to have a voice for the capacity clubs of over 300 that draw a lot of attention to this city. and things are changing now because of economics, as you know, you know, with affordable housing, not enough housing, people moving out of the city. it is happening for the business owners, as well. i'm very -- i own small businesses in -- in the city, and there's a lot of empty

storefronts in each of your districts that i noticed. and i know that even for myself, even trying to start-up new businesses in the city, with the c.u. process being as long as it is, it does discourage a lot of people from making an investment or even trying to attempt to have a new lounge or a new bar or restaurant in the city. and, you know, night life, i love night life. i still go out. i'm still out to 4:00 in the morning. i enjoy the different generations of -- of clients, i guess, or clientele or friends that i have met over the years. and i just enjoy the -- you know, being that person to give some advice to people that want to get in business or maybe there's a -- a club that, you know, i see, you know, just around town that might be slipping somewhere. i might make a suggestion.

but other than that, you know, i just love being here, and i want to serve four more years. >> supervisor safai: great. thank you. any questions -- so i just want to double-check. can you call the other person's name, just to make sure that you're not here. >> clerk: thank you, commissioner. hold on one second. amy baylor-nobler. >> supervisor safai: yeah, i don't think she's here. i think she withdrew her name. any comments or questions, commissioners? i think you answered commissioner yee's question about the attendance record. you passed that initial question. i will say i had the pleasure of working with commissioner lee on a very important issue for our community. this was a nuisance bar in the neighborhood where a security guard at that bar had, unfortunately -- well, let's

say, has been arrested subsequently for the shooting and murdering of a patron. we -- obviously, that case is working its way through court, but the result of that was a continued and highlighted behavior of a very violent and nuisance bar in our neighborhood. we subsequently had a hearing. the license -- entertainment license was suspended temporarily. that was all the power they had within the jurisdiction of their commission. and then, subsequently abc went in and found additional violations, and we were able to shut that bar down. now, we're not in the business of putting businesses out of business, but when there are nuisance businesses that are causing extreme stress and danger to our community, we want to act, and i want to say, i think commissioner lee was very responsive and helped us in that process, along with some of the other cases that we've worked on in helping to

entitle and promote small business in the community and working with particularly those that are in the monolingual community that have a harder time transversing the small -- traversing the small business environment. commissioner lee does a good job in that regard. so i just wanted to make those comments for the record. any members of the public wishing to comment on this item, please come forward. >> good afternoon, commissioners. henry -- >> clerk: one moment please. would you like one minute or two minutes at this time? >> supervisor safai: i think given the pattern, i think we'll just stick with one minute. >> clerk: thank you. >> supervisor safai: thank you. >> good afternoon. i'm the president of the san francisco district of merchants associations. this is one of the most difficult commissions to be out there, the entertainment commission, that steven lee has been very dedicated to make it

work. it is that sort of industry, you get all sorts of people in there, and things happen. but at least he's out there and making sure he's going out there and making sure these businesses operate by the law. lastly, i want to mention we had an event in the summer of love, and we're trying to find a band to play some 50's music -- i'm sorry, the beatles music, and i will tell you, they're great. they were fabulous. thank you, steven. you're awesome for all that you do. i urge you to reappointment him to that position. thank you, supervisors. >> clerk: next speaker. >> hello. thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak today. my name is ray bobbit. i am part of the south of marketen tainment commission. we work with kmiecommissioner

on several issues. we've worked on cell phone theft, we've worked on a multitude of issues. but most importantly we've worked on the ability of nightclubs with capacities of over 400 people to accommodate and evolve into a circumstance with which we can work directly with neighbors and development. that's been very, very important and just on the heels of the planning commission appointments, we've -- want to thank commissioner lee for opening up so many opportunities for us to coexist with the new direction and development of this city by allowing them the ability to stay here. so i just want to thank commissioner lee and urge that you reappointment him. thank you. >> hello, board of supervisors. my name is venita louie, and i am very grateful that san francisco has an entertainment commissioner. steve lee remains a pillar in

the community and many different communities of san francisco, and he is called what i think is the master of organizing and rallying any of us for safety for the community, for the saturdays, to preserve -- arts, inform preserve landmark restaurants. so i want to support steve and the continued work that the board of supervisors does. thanks. >> hello, commissioners. my name is arash, and i own a couple lounges in san francisco. i'm here to support steven lee's -- or commissioner lee's reappointment. i believe he's the most qualified person for this commission, not because of just his ties to the night life and hospitality committee, but also, i've known steven lee about 15 years, and what i

admire the most about him is his ties and his reach to different generations. again, i'm a 15 year veteran, started from -- as a promotor, and i can see that the people like i started today, steven lee can reach out to them and represent them in the entertainment commission. so it's great to have someone like him that understands different generations. thank you. >> clerk: next speaker. >> hello, esteemed commissioners. i'm here to support mr. lee. i happened to meet mr. lee back in 1999 when i was an investor in a nightclub, and he happened to introduce me to who is now my wife when i met him, and we are still together, this young lady and i. mr. lee is a pillar in the night life industry. he also knows how to run a club and how to help people make it in this -- in this city of san

francisco, so i have to throw my hat in and hope that you folks reappoint him. thank you so much. >> clerk: any other speakers? >> supervisor safai: okay. great. any other members of the public wish to comment on this item? seeing none, public comment's closed. [ gavel ]. >> supervisor safai: can we entertain a motion? >> supervisor yee: sure. seems like i did this before. wasn't that long ago. i'd like to make a motion to appoint -- who's appointing him? are we appointing him? >> supervisor safai: yeah. >> supervisor yee: okay. sorry. >> supervisor safai: it's okay. >> supervisor yee: i'd like to make a motion to appoint steven lee to the entertainment commission and send it out with a positive recommendation to the full board.

>> supervisor safai: can we do that without objection? without objection, that item's ordered. thank you, commissioner. congratulations. [applause] >> supervisor safai: please call item number seven. >> clerk: item number seven is a hearing considering appointing two members term ending july 31, 2021, and two members term ending january 1, 2021 to the veteran's affairs commission. >> supervisor safai: so i know we have -- do we have all ten applicants here or just four? four? okay. so why don't we go up one by one. why don't you go first, mathy -- margot. sorry. either one. matthew -- >> good afternoon. my name is matthew brauer. i come to you as a ten-year resident of san francisco district six seeking seat ten

on the veteran's affairs commission. i am a disability lgbtq veteran who has a 15 year record of service both active duty and reserve service in the u.s. army. i also have experience in our social work services and medical research programs. i come to you because i want to leverage my experience in those areas to better serve our city's veterans because their experience really is my own. i struggled as well to transition from military to civilian life, struggled with the cost of housing, difficulty accessing services, and lived under a hotel. so i want to leverage all those rich experiences, the deep knowledge i have about v.a. operations and the ways we serve veterans, the issues and limitations we often face and work with city agencies to optimize services to veterans at both levels of government

through data sharing and through colocating space and other initiatives around policy. i think a lot of you have heard about what those coordinations and collaborations might be. i don't think any of that's new to you. i think what you're looking for in this commission and from me is specific policy recommendations you can make at your level or ordinances you can pass, and those would fall into three main areas. supporting -- in the v.a., we need to greatly expand access to services, and i think specifically for our homeless and disabled veterans, so often, they have difficulty accessing and getting enrolled for services. i think we can do a better job of colocating enrollment specialists in city agencies and empowering specifically our county veteran's service office to do that. additionally, i'd like tovert leverage v.a. data -- better leverage v.a. data so that we can reach under served

communities, and then, additionally, i am going to examine -- if appointed, i am going to examine the difficulty many veterans have in using their v.a. home loan guarantee in securing, when they seek to buy a property. obviously, cost is always a factor in that. but also, the fact that relatively few properties are approved by the v.a. for home loan use. i think we -- all the documents required to do that are in fact held by city agencies and can be proactively transmitted to v.a. to make that easier for veterans to access those units and potentially free up rental units for others. so those rb the main focuses i have on the commission, and i'm sure there will be many others, and many questions you'll have for me, which i'm happy to answer now. >> supervisor safai: supervisor yee? supervisor stefani? great. we'll call you back up if you have any additional questions. >> thank you very much. >> miss ellis? >> hi. my name is margot ellis, and

i'm so glad matt had to go first, because i would echo much of what he said. so i agree with everything that matt said. i for context used to work as the legislative aide for the senate under the obama administration for the department of veterans affairs. so some of the things that i've been talking to my good friends who are on the commission about, along the lines of access, i just kind of want to echo some of the things that matt said. i was part of that group that really helped to advocate to have women vet centers within hospitals. as you know, there's still not a single birthing facility in any of the v.a. hospitals in the u.s. because it wasn't actually built for women, but we actually need different doctors because we literally have different parts. and so making sure that that voice is heard and understood about what the needs of women veterans are is something that i've been doing for a long time, and i look forward to formally doing as a part of the

commission, echoing meat's second point, data to serve under served veterans, this is an amazing town that hears truth when -- in the form of numbers, right? so i think men -- numbers don't lie, right? and so i look forward to working with the commission in helping to look at the data and see how we can better serve populations. and then, the last is something that's really dear to my heart. i am a third generation san franciscan who does not live in the city of san francisco. my grandfather was also a veteran, and he drove a city bus for the city of san francisco and could afford to buy a home with my grandmother who was a sales woman at macy's. my father now drives the trolley cars in san francisco, and i, as someone who is the beneficiary of their hard work, was able to go to georgetown using my g.i. bill but can't afford to buy a house in san francisco. so this issue of how to keep san franciscans in san francisco is something that i

feel very passionate about, and i'm excited to become a part of the commission to talk about how to create a pathway to ensure that when veterans leave and go fight for their country, that they have a place to truly come home to. i hear that there's also a concern about making sure that commissioners come. i just want to say that i've been hanging out at club v.a. commission for a long time. my good friend, dotty guy used to be a commissioner. so i'm looking forward to hopefully not just being a visitor to the club but actually getting membership. >> supervisor safai: thank you. so i think you answered supervisor yee's most important question, have you actually even attended commission meeting, and it sounds like you've been hanging out there. you live there, so that -- >> looking for my membership. >> supervisor safai: okay. we'll call up the next speaker. george. thank you. >> supervisors, i'm george ishikata, i'd like to start out

first by thanking you, expressing my appreciation both for the opportunity to appear before the committee as well as your time in considering my application for a position on the veteran's affairs committee. i'd like to answer two questions in my brief presentation on -- that i think you have. first is why does this guy want to be on the committee, and the second is what qualifications does he have? as far as why i'd like to be on the committee, i think i can best explain that by telling you when i was 15 years old. that was the year i joined the civil air patrol and put on a military uniform for the first time. and as a matter of fact, i still happen to be a member of that organization today. and i joined not because -- not just because the uniform was cool, although i did join because the uniform was cool, but even then, i was a p

patriotic kid and it was my duty. it's the same sort of thing with the veteran's affairs commission. i've attended some meetings, know a number of the commissioners, and i feel that would be an opportunity for me not only to serve the city that i love, but also to give back to the veterans and the veteran community for all the things they've done for all of us here today. as far as my qualifications, i know that there are a number of applicants for these positions. some way well be more -- may well be more qualified than me. i served 30 years in the military, in the army, having retired as a colonel. i attended san francisco state university. i ended up with three consecutive combat tours in iraq, afghanistan, and kosovo, and in my last assignment in

the pentagon, i worked very closely with an organization that was focused on trying to get critical assets and resources to the folks that needed it the most. and i'd like to think i'd be able to help do the same for the veteran's affairs commission as far as the folks that we'd be representing. as far as who i am and what i -- what i -- what the reasons are for my desire to serve on the commission, that's pretty much the indepth detailed analysis that i can provide you in a brief three-minute presentation, and i stand ready for any questions you may have. >> supervisor safai: great. thank you. we'll call you back up if we have any additional -- if we have some questions. i think we're going to hear from the chair of the committee, mr. chesney. >> victim. victor olivari, i'm here to speak on behalf of georgia

ellis, george isshikata, and matthew brauer. these are the people that i cannen ders for a commission that has a lot of work cut out in front of them. i would like to recommend margot ellis for seat 12. i would like to recommend the reappointment of debra dacumos, for seat five, the appointment of george ishikata for seat two, and the appointment of matthew brauer for seat ten. thank you very much. >> any other comments? >> supervisor safai: okay. members of the public, if you would like to speak on this item, please come forward.