conversation you had on transfers. as you know we were trying to do a pilot water transfer to test this concept before the drought. we have been doing it since 2012. i will tell you what we found was one of the fears we had. we are not a member of the state water project, we don't get a borough contract. the borough said we don't care you are talking about it, go away. you can't use our facility. it all fell apart. we initiated our conversations. there are viable options out there. it is complex and difficult and it needs a lot of work and the tuolumne river options are there. that is always our interest as long as ier. that was as option we suggested

at the time. it has not been able to bear any fruit yet that is where we are at with the delta plan. the second item i want to talk k about is last friday. that was a good news story. i appreciated the effort of your staff to really create that celebration. more importantly to get the word out about what has been done. the number of people that have reached out to me separately because they heard about it, saw it on the news. it had been such a long time since we had all of the problems, and i think it really speaks to fortitude, leadership, persistence and strength to get that project and get that dam done. that is a significant improvement to the service area. i do applaud the skilled workers

and your leadership. lastly, if i could have the slides. just to continue my tracking of water use and it also does relate to the discussions we have been having about the delta plan. this is water use through july 2018 as reported to the state board. this is total, not just purchases. for july 17% less than the pre-drought use. you continue to see the gap between the top blue line 2013 and the red line which is our current use. obviously, there has been some rebound, but not back to the pre-drought use. we are now five years later with -- i can attest to tremendous

growth in the service area. this brings to mind the last comment which is because of this and because of the delta plan and because of making water conservation a way of life, the bosca agencies and board are moving sooner for a request for proposal in january for an update youd water demand and conservation water study to look at the entirety in the service area based on adopted land use plan by the land use entities. coordinated among themselves around looking at demand projections, total demand projections and conservation opportunities both making water conservation a way of life and more conservation opportunities to see what we can do there and also what we can do with

nonpottable use or i wouldn't call it satellite type use of changing of water us use at the particular buildings and i am you looking forward to bringing you that information when it is ready. that concludes my comments. thank you very much. commissioners, anything? any public comment on this item? okay next is the consent calendar. >> item 11 all matters listed constitute the consent matter are considered routine. they will be acted upon by a single vote. there will be no separate item unless requested in which event it will be removed in the calendar and considered as a separate item.

>> any request to remove an item. >> i move the item. >> second. >> before we vote any public comment? seeing none all in favor. aye. >> approved. next item, please. >> possible action to adopt the 100 year storm flood risk map review process. delegate authority to make future updates for certain specified purposes. >> we have any discussion, commissioners? >> we have a presentation. >> good afternoon,

commissioners, i run the utility planning division and wastewater. i am here to talk about the draft 100 year storm flood risk map, and as it says the potential action item is to adopt said map to make it final as well as review the process for parcel review. if i could get the slides up. as we spoke about, i believe, in july for this item the 100 year map falls within our greater flood resilient strategies for san francisco. our working project definition is the capacity to anticipate risk, limit impact and recover quickly when damage occurs from flooding and to achieve this, we have three work areas. the first is our capital projects aimed at meeting the level of service storm, five year three hour storm and

significant funding as you know in our capital plan for that. second is the collection system o and m street sweeping, catch basin cleaning. the third is within our program and legislative initiatives. the goal of those initiatives is to really inform the public about where these flood risks are. in addition the next part of the project will be to work with the city family to leverage the phases of development point of sale, new construction and plumbing and lateral requirement to make our city more resilient with each phase of development. >> so the 100 year map is what it sounds like. a map that shows where flood risk is for the 100 year storm. our goal in publishing this is to give property owners and

perspective buyers information about the flood risk to enable them to make in formed decisions about their properties, projects to do on the properties or assets they have on their properties. this map is also to support the development of legislation which will require sellers or lessors of property to disclose to buyers or tenants the location of the property in the flood risk zone. it is a foundation for the city family to advance flood resilience efforts city wide. >> the legislation would be a disclosure on your sale -- what is it called? >> the legislation would require disclosure, yes. we will speak more about this. that would be the next step for this deliverable is to utilize

the map for the proposal of the legislation. >> do you have a timeline for that? >> the ordinance is drafted and is in pretty final form. we would share with the city family group and begin to advance to the board of supervisors. that would be clearly with this group's approval and the first critical path item is today's map. >> do you anticipate push back on that? >> we have not seen much so far. i will get in a little later in the presentation into the outreach and what we have been hearing back from the community during the outreach. for the most part people are glad to have the information. they did have questions about review processes which we have developed. i will get to in a couple of slides as well.

>> let me quickly go over how we developed the map, the basis for it is. as part of urban watershed assessment process sfpc developed state-of-the-art model to support the watershed approach to public engage mend and that model was one of the significant contributions that urban watershed made. we used that to develop the map to have the flood resilience effort. >> this slide just tells how we then used the model. we simulated the depth and extent in flood anything a 100 year design storm. the model including within it drainage infrastructure pipes tunnels and pump stations.

it includes ground surface data about elevation. we did include the impact of expected sea level rise on our infrastructure in terms of back flow. to be clear, however, that is about sea level rise in coastal waters, not the advanced precipitation models for stormwater. when we receive that data under development with a large project that could be incorporated into the model. i want a fine point on that. that is one of main questions we have been getting. we took all of that data to express it using gis and identified areas with deep flooding which we defined for this purpose to be greater than 6 inches of flooding and contiguous flooding which we defined greater than half a block. when we identified all of the parcels that met both of those

criteria, drawing a boundary around that is what yielded the map. >> so you can see the result you have that exercise here. this is the draft map that we have been utilizing for the project and for our outreach. the blue areas or blue wish purple areas are flood risk zones, not surprisingly you can see that they very much overlap with the historical and natural waterways which, of course, are low-lying areas. i am not sure if you can see very well. it is in turquoise, historical waterwayses. hatched areas were not included in this study at this time. then for your reference this map is from 1869.

it was part of the basis for the watewaterways on the prior slid. you can see the alignment with the 100 year flood map. >> that map where the sewer areas were not part of the study. >> the separate sewer areas. >> there is a couple reasons for that. one is that as you know there is significant development occurring there which is subject to subdivision regulations including flood elevation for the separate sewers such as treasure island with its own plan and hunters' point. those are under different conditions than our combined sewer areas. >> can i get the slides back up? this is to zoom in to a neighborhood around the lake showing the map as you get more

detailed. we also did create and piloted a searchable, zoomable map for the public so they can put in their address and zoom in to their property to determine whether or not their property is in the risk zone. then we did a robust notification process which we described in our last visit here in july. we mailed about 4,000 letters to properties in this area to inform them about their location as well as all of the differently sources available to them. we have a lot of faq as well as rain ready programs such as adopt a train, etc. our outreach included public

available sessions where the publico talk one-on-one with staff about technical questions as well as presentations. we reached out to neighborhoods particularly in flooding areas. when we last visited with you, this parcel review process was something we talked about. it was under development at the time. staff has now completed this process. the purpose of it is to acknowledge that property owners may want to request a review to understand whether or not their property would remain in the flood map. there are two criteria that could potentially have them taken off the map. that would be if the parcel's ground elevation is above the 100 year storm elevation. secondarily if there is a significant barrier to stormwater to prevent the

flooding from entering the entire parcel. >> can that barrier be a temporary barrier? >> we center in that category retaining walls, concrete walls and senses. staff did have a lot of discussion about whether or not a fence, for example would be in the same category. the conclusion we came to was that if upon a site visit the staff determined that the fence was a barrier and was routing stormwater off of the site, that that would be grounds for taking it off. however, we also determined there would be a map updating process recognizing that in the future somebody co-opt to remove

that fence. similarly, with our flow factor adjustment when the property owner gets the flow factor adjustment they don't keep it forever recognizing they may do something else. there are updates and this would follow that same process. we then determined how this process would work in terms of getting back to the customer. the first step is that the applicants would submit the information to the sfpc and we do have a form developed for this. we would then review the property based on our model data and new data the applicant was able to provide and at the puc's discussion after looking at the site, a site visit would be performed at this time. we would then make a determination about the outcome for the property, then we would

get back to the person about the determination and update the map. because the update will take a little bit longer, we would give them documentation about the determination and update the map on the recurring basis. so based on the fact we have the substance of the map completed, the 100 year map, but the re-- plus the review process required for the public to potentially ask to get property removed. our next step is to ask for formal adoption of the flood risk map. following that we would move forward with the legislation we also discussed last time which would require sellers and lessors of property to disclose to buyers and tenants the property is in the flood risk zone so they could make in

formed decision about protecting their property and assets. that is what we have today for you. happy to take any questions. >> just to be clear, what is before us today does not require any ratification by the board of supervisors, is that right? >> no, my understanding is that today's action would just be to adopt the map itself. >> that will be a final action? . >> that would be a final action. >> what won't subject to the board of supervisors review would be disclosure ordinance. thank you. >> i will move the item. >> second. >> any public comment on this? seeing none. all in favor. >> from is public comment. >> please come on up.

>> may i ask that you give the commissioners the packets. my name is marilyn amini. my parcel has been identified as being on the flood zone map, and i am at 2667 14th avenue. you will see an arrow pointing to that. the criteria 4-bing on this map -- for the being on the map it is likely i would experience deep and contiguous flooding at least six inches. if you look at the second page of what i have handed you. actually, the fourth page showing how high my home is, i think it is highly unlikely that

i would have any flooding at all because there is a continuous down sloping of slapped past my home to the corner at 14th and remarkable down -- what shall i say. down sloping down to 15th. the water opinioniously goes downhill around the corner at 14th and then down to 15th, which suffers real problems because you have the fact there is in sloping on all corners of the section. you will see the hand out that fpuc gave to all of the neighborhood asking for help after the 2013 flood at 15th and

walanona asking that we remove street debris to help what is circled as being a flood zone. i don't know how my property got on the map as being a parcel that would in fact be subjects to 6 inches of flooding because as i say, the water keeps moving on, and i think i included on the third page this is my home. it sits quite a bit higher than the 300lanona home at the corner. 7 to 12 feet higher than that. there is no way that i would accumulate 6 inches of flooding.

i question that, you know, i should be on this map at all. i think it is sens should have the -- citizens should have the opportunity to review this before you adopt the map. >> thank you. your time is up. we can forward this to staff to see if it is something we can look at later. thank you. >> we can forward this to staff to look at your assessment of your property. thank you for your comments. >> my understanding is that there is a process for a circumstance like this to be able to say that exactly what you are saying through staff charnels that you don't believe your home should be part of this

map. i think there is a process that sarah walked us through to show us a process for community members. >> the point is that we use modeling and the information we have nout the field. in case something changes or we miss something there is a process where you can remove your property from the map. we adopt the map because we did extensive outreach with everyone. by coming here and giving us the information, we will evaluate your property right now.

[ inaudible ] >> once you give us information we will take you off the list. -- off the map. . >> that is the key. i think to the resident's point the contiguous is the problem. if you are talking about seven to 10 feet, i can see how that would be an acceptable appeal. at the end it says delegate to the general manager to make future updates for certain specified purposes. would this be a specified purpose? a unique circumstance? >> it is interesting because you could have a complex where you subdivide it. you could be on the 12th floor. you don't flood. you feel sorry for who is on the first floor. can you hear ne?

>> i can hear you. >> i think those are the challenges. it depends how home are subdivided, right? you can live in a complex, you know, a multi family home where on the first floor you flood, but on the third floor you don't flood, it is two separate units. those are the challenges w were facing when we came up with this map. i understand your issue. >> i don't think i should have appear order the map. nobody came out to look. i did bring the situation up when i came to the community meeting. i got a letter back saying, well, there is a flow. i could read the wording of it. there is flow past my house, but that doesn't mean that i would be affected by the flow.

in fact, the fact that there is contiguous flow past the house means that i will be protected from a 6-inch flood. >> we will look into it. we will look into it now. okay. thank you. >> if i could get your information, staff can get back to you. >> i want to add because this is a model that synthesizes storms that is why we established this process, recognizing not every storm is how the model says and that there can be variations in ground elevation. if we get your information, we can look at it. >> i think we will have this conversation in other area us. in rules committe commit they we

particular when 71 residents. we have to be you ready for the ordinary circumstances people think they have or don't have at all and be ready for each individual appeal without having appeals, right? it is a little dicey. >> we tried to reach out, we did millers, community workshops, we notified the community organizations to get the word out, and, you know, we will miss people so we have a process where we can reevaluate everything. the main thing that helps us improve the model. one thing we have included in the model is the urban watershed assessment. that is in the model. the more accurate data we can get from the process will be

helpful as well. >> i'm sorry. this is going into title. >> you just by your action you today creates an appeal process. it sits forth the rules why by property owners can file formal request for review on their parcel and sets out the process to review. two criteria for granting request if he willvation is higher than what the competitor model showed or retraining wall our structure that our model didn't pick up to you block the water. if that grants it, you have delegated authorities in this action if you vote on it today for staff to amend the map. you are right, the parcel shouldn't be in here they can a the map and pull the parcel out.

>> the urban watershed assessment is online? it feels like that would be an important document four residents to be able to look at. they are in the watershed, for example. >> the urban watershed assessment information attained in all you have the features, the curbs and the areas and the slopes and all of that stuff have been placed into the model -- into the model so that it knows all you have this information? that was what i was saying. based off that information and effort we went through to do that assessment, we incorporate in the model. >> i understand.

i did two things. i went to the website as we were talking and i didn't see the urban watershed assessment. that is the first thing to look at to see if my house is in the urban watershed. then i went to sf water.org you and that link didn't work either. it iit is important for resideno have a first step to go to online or two steps which would be the assessment and floodway site like me to be my house on the map? so the watershed assessment is made up of numerous patters. the first part was characterization, looking at what are the physical characteristics of the watershedses? that is on the website. i think it is very interesting

and very useful. that being said, i would suggest that it probably would not assist somebody in this particular conversation just because it is so broad and it is targeted at explaining the physical characteristics of all eight of our urban watersheds. critical for urban planning but not for flood map appeal process. that is available. the characterization and assessment online both went into informing the improvement strategy. >> blooyou mean to look up the property itself? that is a user friendly interface to put your specific parcel address in on the flood map and see if it is in the flood risk zone. >> i tried that. it didn't work. when it does work, it would be

important for residents to do broad outreach effort. >> some outreach effort so residents can be able? >> if it does not work we will address that. it worked yesterday because we checked it. we will definitely look into that. just so commissioners are aware of the outreach, we did send 4,000 letters. we sent letters to every person whose parcel was in the flood risk zone. we then had five different public availability sessions across the city and i didn't mention in the interest of time but in the presentation we did do the presentations at weekends, nights, workdays, all kinds of times to be available to the public as well as with targeted presentations we did all evening presentations.

the outreach was robust. there are always going to be exceptions and physical conditions that we need to account four and hence the parcel review process. that is what we want to recognize. >> could i request that -- because i think it is correct to assume we are going to continue having this conversation for a while -- that we lead off with social media, mail, social contacts, 9% return on the mail so we are armed with that as we go to individual matters, yeah, i know we do that, but that is perfect. >> absolutely. other questions? >> we have a seconded motion.

all in favor. opposed. >> approved. next item, please. you. >> item 13 adopt a resolution for code section 8387 determining the sfpc operates overhead lines that present a risk of wildfire that are located in high fire danger zones and high fire danger zones and authorize development plan. >> i move approval. >> any public comment? >> all in favor? aye. >> it is approved. nicely done. >> next item. >> 14. approving c s1100 for installation of aclara

technologies for the san francisco power commission power enterprise not to exceed $9,993,604 and a duration of 10 years. >> a motion. >> i will move it. >> second. >> any discussion? any public comment on this item? all in favor? oppose the. it is approved. >> item 15. performance goals for fiscal year 2018-19 for the general manager. >> motion. >> i will move to the attachment. >> i will second it. i have questions. first of all, comment. these objectives reflect the

discussions we have had. when i focused on particularly the policy areas with the emphasis on compliance, which is what we have asked for, and i think those provisions are appropriate. i did have a question about under the water capital project implementation you have two items. ground water project and recycled water project. these are listed as ongoing. i am not sure how we know if you have done anything here. no disrespect. i am not sure what it is. i don't know what the target is in what are we trying to hit? 5.2 or .2 and .3? >> so 5.3?

>> 5.5, 5.2 and 3 on page 226. >> the reason i put it in there is to sort of measure the effort that we have done in those topics and i think we put them there so that it will be subjective of how much effort we had to do for like ground water acceptance, and, you know, how we move forward. that is a challenging one. we can eliminate it, but some of

the things how do you get people to kind of accept, you know, the recyclecled water one. we do have the capital projects and we can give you interim date on the recycled water project. but i think it is just more ongoing is more of acceptance, but we can definitely. >> this is under the section title water capital project implementation. it seems there is a target to be hit. >> have a question. are you done? >> well, i am. i have one more thing. a couple pages later 5.7.

you have eligible customers or portion there of. the last operation or portion thereoff that makes it hard to understand what we are measuring. >> 5.7. >> the date of july has gone by. >> july of 2018. >> that would be 19. >> the fact that there would be some kind of target. >> i think the date is off here. >> our intent is by the end of the year we will have extended the enrollment to all of the city? >> no, 2020. >> so 2020.

>> beabarbara hale. it was directing us to offer enroll meant to the extent feasible to all of san francisco by july of 2020, but we are in a position to do it by july of 2019. >> moved it up on me. >> put it in the growth plan. >> whatever the objective is we should state it, not just say some portion of it. >> we would get rid of portion there of. >> if that is what we mean. if the objective is to get it done next year that is what we

should measure you against. if it is something else, we should put something else in there. >> all right. i am gathering that we don't have to amend each and every item here. we just get to say change it. >> i am comfortable with that. >> there is 2.6 work force development policy october 2018. that is not going to happen. i am holding it up. i am meeting with staff they are extremely attentive and supportive. the delay is attributable to myself. you haven't seen the work done on that item. it is appropriate to bounce that to summer of next year as well. that is only fair, right? >> if you would like. it doesn't mean we have to wait.

i am trying to get it done. in the description we say why? i want to make sure my staff, you know, that i can point to we are making these commitments. >> in january. >> january 2019? >> october we know that ain't happening. >> the only other thing is our practice based on the last one was we could attach something that is perfectly appropriate. santa cruz i haven't submitted, mr. chair, but we are allowed to submit these because they have our signature with comments as appropriate. >> i have a question. have we looked into the bottled

hatch snatchy did many years ago and it proved impossible. >> i am glad you asked that question. it is part of which one is it. >> 5.3.1. >> so what we are doing is that, you know, going to start mentioning it to some of you. going into the board chambers and supervisors office, they havtheyhave bottled water. certain pipes when they retrofitted this building we didn't do all of the plumbing. some of the water is brown, you have to let it rub. run. they ask me if you care for water. i look at nestle.

at least the five gallon we need to say really take advantage of this opportunity to brand so they see our water. when we come in there, it is positive. we start looking into it, working with steve richy. they identify a bottling company that will bottle our water in a five gallon and we are using pretty much the same logo that you had back there. we modified it and updated it on the five gallon bottles. as part of that is the work force component where we get folks and do the training to not only refill them. one, you have to take the water truck to you the bottling place, then you have to bring the bottles and store them. also, you have got to take them to each one you have the

supervisors offices at city hall. if that is successful, we will do it at the hospitals. it is part of the mou with nurses they require bottled water. we are looking at the costs. actually, the costs the departments are paying for bottled water will pay for what we are doing. we are going to do the five gallon, then i don't think we will do the smaller ones, but i am starting to realize when you go to certain events where, you know, they want to hand out water, you know, there may be an opportunity tour, you know, special supply of that. we need to think about that approach. the five gallons, you know, you can reuse the five gallons that is the plan. >> i love it.

>> that is great. >> i will have paula do the whole presentation on the five gallons. >> perfect. >> anything else, commissioners? did we have a motion already? and second any public comment on this item? all in favor. opposed. approved. >> now to closed session. >> we will read the items prior to public comment. item 18, existing litigationtor pacific gas & electric. item 20 exist you go litigation pacific gas & electric. item 21, item 22, item 23 exist you go litigation pacific gas & electric. >> any public comments? prior to closed session?

okay. a motion? attorney-client privilege ledges. >> both to assert. >> second. you >> you we are back. this concludes closed session. do we have a motion regarding whether the discussion of closed session >> you motion not to disclosed. >> moved. commissioners is there any other new business? >> we need to vote. >> i am sorry all in favor. >> aye. >> opposed. it is approved. >> i will get it right now that i will not be president any more. any other new business? okay. with that, the meeting is

adjourned. thank you all very much..

>> hi, i'm ryan a prlth letting project manager with the sfpuc working at the sfpuc is a fast-paced environment the puc is american people eye person so breath and depth allows us to work on allows me to move across my career path. >> fill the roadway. >> our unique projects is the heritage puc water treatment long-term improvement plant it's one of the largest projects i've managed and supervised

to be successful as a project manager you have to be hard working and self-motivated and being adaptable is important because the construction it is very fabulous that get me up in the morning you're going to be project solving and seeing the project go to me that's fun, i like coming to >> when i open up the paper every day i'm just amazed at how many different environmental issues keep popping up. when i think about the planet i want to leave for my children and other generation, i think of what contribution i can make on a personal level to the environment. ♪

clean power sf is san francisco's key way of fighting climate change by renewable energy and offering it to san francisco customers. i'm from the san francisco public utilities commission. the program came about with state wide legislation in 2002 to enable people to take more control over supplies. i first heard of the program when the organization was advocating to launch clean power sf. what i'm most excited about, it's going to bring 100% renewable energy to my home and reinvest into renewable energy infrastructure and jobs. i had gone to a lot of street fairs and heard from the staff at the san francisco public

utilities commission to sign up for clean power sf even before it launched. >> we learned about clean power sf because our sustainability team is always looking for clean operations. linkedin is the largest online network. there are about 530 million members using our site. in this san francisco office there's about 1400 employees working in roughly 400,000 square feet. >> after signing up for the program we heard about the san francisco program and learned they had commercial rates and signed up for that. i'm the co-owner of the new wheel electric bike shop. we opened this store in 2012 and the new wheel sells and services electric bikes. 11 people work here in san francisco and our store is about

2,000 square feet. electric bikes are fantastic for transportation in the city, they're clean and green and you get places faster than any other form of transportation. it amplifies the power, it doesn't replace it. it makes it easier to get places by bicycle and it's so enjoyable and environmentally friendly way to go and more convenient in san francisco. >> clean power sf requires two products, green, 40% renewable and competitively priced with pg and e. for those who want to fight climate change more, 100% renewable at $0.02 per kilawatt. >> i decided to go with the super greens, after finding it

only to cost about $5 more a month to have super green, that's a no-brainer, i can do that. >> we were pleased that clean power sf offers the super green 100% for commercial entities like ours and residents for the city of san francisco. we were pleased with the package of services for linkedin and now encouraging our employees who have a residence in san francisco to sign on as well. >> clean power sf buys its power from renewable plants that feed the energy directly into the grid. >> there's a commitment to sustainability throughout the entire organization and this clean power opportunity reflects that. >> one of the wind farms we use is the shilo wind farm and that is large enough to be able to provide energy for up to 200,000

homes. >> our mission is sustainability, even though our bikes are minimal energy use, it still matters where the energy comes from and part of our mission in sustainability is how we run everything -- run our business. having the lights come on with clean energy is very important. >> the sunset reservoir has solar panels that take up about four city blocks covering the reservoir and the solar power generates energy for city resources and clean power sf for residents participating in the program. >> it was easy to sign up for the program, i went online to cleanpowersf.org and i started getting pieces in the mail letting me know i was going to be switched over and it just happened. when i pay my bill, i still go to pg and e and i don't see any

difference between now and a year ago. >> sign up online, just have your account number ready and it takes about two minutes and there's nothing to install. no lines are getting connected to your home. all the power goes through the existed power grid. >> we haven't had any problems with the switch over to clean power. >> it's super easy to sign up. our book keeper signed up online, it took about 15 minutes. nothing changed but now we have cleaner energy. >> we see clean power sf as a key strategy to meet renewable energy goal, we have a goal of 50% renewable energy by 2020. currently we have enrolled about 86,000 customers across the city. about 20% of what we hope to serve in the future and in the next two years we'll offer service to all san francisco electricity customers. >> an easy way to align your

environmental responsibilities and goals around climate change and it's so easy that it's hard to not want to do it and it doesn't really add anything to the bill. >> joining clean power sf is one of the easiest ways to fight climate change, receiving cleaner energy at low and stable rates, you're helping to support a not for profit that helps influence the energy grid and produce more production. >> i would encourage any business to seriously convert to the clean sf service. it's good for environment, business and the community. >> you can sign up online our call and the great thing is, you'll have the peace of mind that you're doing your part in your household to help the environment. ♪

♪ (clapping) ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ celebrating the wow. turnout this is our third annual to celebrate pride we notice we didn't have community event for pride. we actual had 19 we had godzilla and are you ball weird names i think its unique we're able to

have special event we're all women that relax and have fun you know everything is friendly and kind we're all equal i'm happy that >> good morning, everybody. this meeting will come to order. welcome to the september 26th, 2018 regular meeting of the public safety and neighbourhood services committee. i am chair of the committee. to my right, will be vice chair, supervisor and ronen we have supervisor peskin. i would like to thank jesse larson and helena mendoza for staffinghi