have special event we're all women that relax and have fun you know everything is friendly and kind we're all equal i'm happy that >> good morning, everybody. this meeting will come to order. welcome to the september 26th, 2018 regular meeting of the public safety and neighbourhood services committee. i am chair of the committee. to my right, will be vice chair, supervisor and ronen we have supervisor peskin. i would like to thank jesse larson and helena mendoza for staffing this meeting.

mr clerk, do you have any announcements. >> thank you. please ensure you have silenced your electronic devices. completed speaker cards and any documents to be completed as part of the files to be committed -- given to the clerk. >> chair mandelman: great. mr clerk, please call the first item. >> agenda item number 1 is a hearing to consider the promise to premise transfer of a nonsale general public liquor licenses doing business at a pub located at 1706 post street. it will serve the public convenience and necessity of the city and county. >> chair mandelman: great. i don't believe we have a representative from the sfpd here but we do have the recommendation for approval.

>> hold on but we do have the police department's recommendation for approval with conditions and we also have the applicant. go ahead. >> thank you. mr chair, supervisors, i'm here today -- >> chair mandelman: please state your name. >> my name is mark and i'm here with my client who is the owner of the pub at 1706 post street. this is an interesting situation where my client purchased at this establishment it has been in operation under the previous owner for seven years, and before that another owner but it was a karaoke lounge and sport bar. towards the end of his transfer at the abc, they came in to do a final inspection and found there was a mezzanine that was not on their plot map. in situations like that, has to go back to planning and it has to go to what is called a

premise to premise transfer. so premise one is the downstairs premise and premise two is a downstairs. in order to do that we need public convenience and necessity determination. so this has been a community serving establishment. it is very small. with increase in the mezzanine, it adds about 20% of the square footage. and there has been no noise complaints, no police issues for the last seven years. he is a great operator. we would like to request that this be granted and scent off to the full board. >> chair mandelman: thank you. did you want to say anything cleo k. are there any members of the public -- are there any questions firstly thank you. you can sit back down. are there any members of the public would like to speak on this item? seeing none, i will close public comment. colleagues, the items before us. >> supervisor ronen: i'm happy to make a motion to prepare a

resolution finding that this license needs -- >> chair mandelman: public convenience on necessity? and without objection, we can approve that motion. do you want us to separately vote on that? ok. do you want to make a motion to approve that resolution? >> supervisor ronen: make a resolution -- make a motion for a resolution. >> chair mandelman: great. ok. >> thank you. >> supervisor ronen: you're welcome. >> chair mandelman: congratulations. mr clerk, can you call the next item? >> clerk: five agenda item number 2 is an ordinance to authorize a chief of police to provide signed verification a preapplication meetings for neighbourhood restrictive liquor licenses spee what i think this is yours. >> supervisor ronen: thank you so much. thank you for hearing this today

this legislation speaks to -- seeks to streamline the application approval process for type 87 liquor licenses. this new liquor license was created in 2016 their state legislation and is available to establishments only in commercial corridors that have been identified as needing activation and investment by the city. this new neighbourhood license significantly is more affordable than liquor licenses in the current private market which can reach up to a quarter of a million dollars. neighborhood are on the list of eligible areas in the city where you can apply for the license. given the high cost of reds and the threat of displacement, we need to do everything in our power to support small businesses in these particular neighbourhoods. this is rather simple. the amendment assigns the police department as the jurisdiction to provide verification at the outreach plan and neighborhood engagement rather than the board of supervisors and streamlines

the application process. this way the applicant will need to come to the board of supervisors once instead of twice. making the entire process quicker, easier, faster. >> chair mandelman: great. i believe we may have someone from workforce development here. come on up. >> hello. i'm from the office of economic and workforce development. these race -- these licenses are raised last year and we were very successful. we had 19 applicants apply for the five licenses. they were issued to the dark course and existing businesses in the excelsior. to a newly opened businesses in the bayview received them. this hearing is something that other applicants do not have to do and is only required of these type 87 liquor licenses and it is designed as an opportunity to meet with the community in the development of the business plan

to ensure it is responsive to the community. we believe that this will streamline and so we are hopeful that you will approve. you should also have a letter from the police department agreeing with us. >> chair mandelman: great. thank you. are there any members of the public who would like to speak on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. the item is before us. >> supervisor ronen: i will make a motion to move this with positive recommendation. >> chair mandelman: great. we can take that without objection. fantastic. >> thank you. >> chair mandelman: thank you. mr clerk, i think that since supervisor safai is expected to come later we will call item four before item three. >> clerk: it is an ordinance to erect a statue of my angelou at the main library. stating a city policy that 30% of nonfictional figures --

public building names and street names be women. amending big ministries of code to create a fund to accept gifts to pay for the design, construction,, repair, maintenance and improvement to public art on city property and affirming the appropriate findings. >> chair mandelman: thank you for calling that item. i note that not only are we missing one supervisor but we are also missing supervisor stephanie. we should probably recess for ten minutes. any suggestions about how long we should recess for? >> i would just hold the hearing >> chair mandelman: i think we should recess for 15 minutes to give supervisors a chance to get here but we will start in 15 minutes. five minutes. we will race rice us for five minutes. supervisors,

>> chair mandelman: we will reconvene. supervisor sc14 is here. do you want to talk about your item? >> supervisor stefani: thank you. thank you for the opportunity to speak on this item today. in san francisco and across the nation, we lack representation of women on boards and commissions in leadership positions and in public spaces. this legislation will lead the city and the public to recognize a great accomplishments of women throughout history. the people living in san francisco now and future generations must to see the accomplishments of great women alongside the accomplishments of great men your children, both boys and girls, should see themselves in history and in our public works of art and the one way to remember this history. the maya angelou statue is the first step to accomplishing full representation of women in our city. the statute is just the first

step. this legislation also establishes a goal of 30% female representation in the public realm by 2020 and i am hoping we can get to 50%. when we seep streets and public buildings and works of art will finally see the women who have impacted our world. researcher just 30% is in proportion with critical mass is reached in a group setting. the voices of the minority group become heard rather than simply representing the minority. this legislation establishes a public-private fund for the design and maintenance of statues depicting historically significant women including maya angelou. after discussion with the arts commission on the department -- department on the status of women, we have proposed amendments and they have been handing out doors handed out to you. on page 1, lines one and three, we are changing the word from statue, to the general term of work of art. on page 3, section three, changing the word of statue to more general terms of work of art to. and page 3, section 15 clarifies

the maya angelou work of art will be a significant figurative representation of the poet. page 4, clarifies the categories and city departments which we will be tracking to hit our goal of 30% nonfictional representation by 2020. on page 4 and 5, it updates the department reporting dates. this legislation is groundbreaking, not just for san francisco before the united states. this legislation gives an opportunity to provide proper representation for women and the public realm and i want to thank my cosponsors, supervisor ronan and cohen, tang, kim, supervisor brown and also to marco kelly who really spearheaded this under supervisor farrell. i also want to thank the arts commission, the library commission on the department on the status of women. thank you for hearing this item and i would love to take questions if i -- if you have any. and we have elizabeth newman from the department on the status of women to answer any questions. >> chair mandelman: thank you.

did you want to make a presentation on this? ok. >> good morning. thank you so much for bringing this item forward. i was in the department of the status of women and we are glad to be here in support of this legislation. i want to remark that our commission did vote to support this legislation when it was initially before this committee back in january. we are also very encouraged by the provision that was -- that would monitor the representation of women. this is an important effort to rectify the underrepresentation of women's contribution to society. and to encourage women possess leadership in the future. this is really important because art that recognizes historical people, very often is recognizing white men. and one of our important roles

and this will be to monitor the representation of women. it is something that has been required by the department through the groundbreaking convention on the elimination of discrimination against women that san francisco past 20 years ago. we are encouraged by the fact that tracking the appointments of women to commissions and boards has resulted in women being equally represented and appointed positions. however, we have also found that in particular, asian and latino women and men are underrepresented. i do have copies of the most recent report for you to review if you should like to. we just want to make sure that we recognize and thank supervisor stephanie for bringing this forward and mentioning that we support the amendments to address the reporting requirements and we urge your support of the legislation to continue the legacy of leadership on women's rates.

thank you. >> chair mandelman: thank you. >> supervisor ronen: i wanted to thank supervisor sc14 for taking over this legislation. i am proud to be a cosponsor. i was -- stefani for taking over this legislation. i was at the event when this idea was come up with. it was an idea and an effort spearheaded by a woman who was under the obama administration. she has a plan to make sure that women are represented, not only in public depictions of historical figures that we all look to and admire, but also on corporate boards. and in management positions or in governments. so she has the 30, 30, 30 plan. thirty% representation -- public public statues in commemoration, 30%, 30% board positions held by

women and 30% government representation. she seeks to achieve that, i believe, by 2020. which is a tall order. but i think a very, a very important goal. i am glad that we are trying to accomplish that in at least one way in san francisco. i also wanted to mention that it was mr rios who was responsible for advocating and winning a policy to put the first portrait of a women on u.s. currency. and we were set to have harriet tubman be the first woman to be depicted on a 20-dollar bill but my understanding of that is at the treasury department will not commit to this under the trump administration. it is unclear whether this plan will move forward, which is very frustrating. i was looking forward to the day where i would see harriet tubman on our u.s. currency. i hope that that will still

happen. i wanted to thank you supervisor sc14 -- stefani, it is very important that our daughters get to look at statues of women who have accomplished amazing things in our society. and something that they rarely get to do today. if they get to see a woman depicted on a statue, it is usually a fictional woman. a character. very rarely is it actually a human being who lived at accomplish great things. we know there is no shortage of women who have done that in the united states. thank you so much. >> chair mandelman: thank you. are there members of the public who would like to speak on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. the item is before us. i believe we need to act first on the amendment. so moved. we can take the amendment without objection. and then.

>> supervisor ronen: i moved to bring this for the positive recommendation. >> chair mandelman: great. we will do that without objection. all right. thank you. mr clerk can you call our next item? or our last remaining items. >> there's one remaining item. agenda item number 3 pick an ordinance to amend the height -- health code to establish a surplus of medication suppository program to be overseen by d.b.h. >> chair mandelman: supervisor safai is here as our guest. >> supervisor ronen: -- 35 this is an exciting thing. i had the great fortune of sitting down with janet riley, one of the board members of planning by the bay and she said i had this great idea. it will help low income san franciscans that have a hard time accessing good, reliable healthcare and access to good

cost reduced medication. and so she bought -- brought in a group called serum. they started talking about the ability to take medication from individuals that may be have passed away or don't need it anymore and take that medication and recycle it without having it go into the waste stream. and sending it to specifically for free clinics. so we are essentially mirroring the program. we are getting access and then we reached out to the department of public health and work with them over the last ten months to come up with this legislation. we have had to make sure that we were abiding by state regulations and so on and so forth. because we are a city and a county, and made the process that much easier. a lot of people ask why we are a city and a county and what benefits there are, but in this instance, it was a direct

benefit. we have the ability as a county representative. we have representatives from three clinics here today. two of which are represented in my district. there is many more all over san francisco. they are all over the city. mission neighbourhood health centre his, clinic by the bay, others that are basically dealing with low income families that would not otherwise have access to good, affordable medication and good affordable health care. so we believe today that this is a strong step in the promise that we have made to bring full universal healthcare to san franciscans. we are also being respectful and i know supervisor peskin joined us here today. he is here today. he is a very conscious of protecting our oceans and our water stream and the committees that he sits on. this takes medication out of the waste stream and not polluting our oceans and water streams and the environment, as well.

essentially, the legislation creates a surplus drug repository this estimation program. donor organizations, essentially , since 2015, have taken free and reduced medication from over 1,550,000 patients. and we have removed over 2,000, almost a quarter of a million pounds of pharmaceutical waste from the waste stream and medicines. we are taking a big step today. i will open it up for public comment or ask the department of public health to come forward and give a timeline of what the next steps would be and then i will thank the people that really helped to put this together over the last year, as we have worked on it. other than the people i mentioned already. thank you. >> good morning. i am the chief pharmacy officer with the department of public health. i'm very pleased to be speaking today on behalf of the department of public health.

in the past, we have supported the safe med disposal ordinance which was previously known as the med project which has been effective since 2017, february. since that time, the project has collected more than 7.4 tons or 14,000 pounds of unwanted and expired medications from community members in san francisco. the med project is fully funded by pharmaceutical industries and it is now operating 47 medication kiosks at 46 locations in san francisco. we now welcomed the introduction of this new ordinance which will allow eligible entities like clinics with pharmacies to receive donated surplus medications and then provide them for free to low income persons. the medications might otherwise have been destroyed and it will

improve access to pharmaceutical therapies for persons who might otherwise not be able to move forward with them and reduce pharmaceutical waste by recycling surplus medications. as the public health agency, we want to acknowledge our support for this ordinance which will provide these free medications to low income persons. thank you. >> chair mandelman: thank you. >> supervisor safai: i think we can open it up through public comments. i want to recognize my cosponsor , supervisor safai -- stefani and stepping forward for sponsoring this legislation. >> supervisor stefani: thank you supervisor safai for taking a lead on this. i did a tour of clinic by the bay with janet riley and heard about this program and came back to supervisor safai and i said i want to spearhead this with you. i was so upset he beat me to it because it is such a wonderful program. i was talking to my mom and my sister. they're both nurses and they

were telling me some horror stories of people that actually cannot get the prescriptions that they need and people that have to choose whether or not they are buying groceries are getting medicine that they need to keep going. so i think this is an important program i am very happy to be a cosponsor on it spee five thank you. >> chair mandelman: we can open up through public comment and then i will say a few words about how it will work in realtime. if there are members of the public would like to speak, they should come on up. you will have two minutes. please state your first and last name clearly and speak directly into the microphone. those of you who have paired statements are encouraged to leave a copy with the committee clerk for inclusion into the initial file. no applause or booing is permitted. in the interest of time, speakers are encouraged to avoid repetition. >> good morning, supervisors. my name is claire from the nonprofit, serum, we help

implement and create drug donation programs around the country to safely and efficiently reduce prescription drug costs and promote environmentally sustainable healthcare practices. our flagship program in california has been assisting santa clara county surplus medication repository and distribution program since 2010. we have partnered with santa clara county county run pharmacies to help manage, receive and inventory donations from over 200 medicine donors. this pharmacy is exclusively supplied by donated medicine and since 2015 has dispensed over $2 million of medicine to patients in need. the types of medicine that are eligible for donation are noncontrolled, not expired, not opened and medicine that has not been in the hands of individual patients or the public. we fully support the ordinance establishing the san francisco surplus medication repository and distribution program. thank you, so much.

>> chair mandelman: neck speaker. -- next speaker. mrs. riley. >> good morning. i am the cofounder of clinic by the bay. we are a free, primary care clinic and the excelsior district of san francisco. we have been around and providing primary care, preventative healthcare since 2010 at clinic by the bay and we are almost entirely volunteer run. currently, we have 1700 patients at clinic by the bay. last year, we did more than 2,000 patient visits. because our patients are living on limited resources, they often come to the clinic where the complicated, chronic conditions like diabetes, high lipids, hypertension, that have gone undetected and untreated for many years. as you can imagine, these conditions require medication.

when you are uninsured, like all of our patients are, and you don't have access to medication, getting monthly medications that you need to control these conditions is untenable for most of our patients. and left untreated, these chronic conditions can be debilitating. they are demoralizing and they can even be fatal. which you might imagine as well. so, when we learned about the organization that was matching access medication with patients in need, we thought it was a fantastic idea. we knew that not only would it be incredibly helpful for patients that could -- at our clinic, but for patients throughout san francisco. it will save lives. i want to especially thank a supervisor safai. you have been amazing. thank you supervisor stefani. i will hope you will hear from our doctor to, out our clinic,

has been shepherding this legislation through as well. thank you and i hope we can get your support for this important legislation. >> chair mandelman: thank you. next speaker. >> good morning, supervisors. i am the executive director of mission neighbourhood health centre. we have several clinics in the mission and one in the excelsior and we serve about 13,000 patients each year. about 30% on issue. this program will greatly benefit our uninsured patients, but not only the uninsured. we had a situation with a patient on medicare. and for some reason, she got into the wrong medicare part d. program and needed to pay about $1,200 a month for her diabetes medication. she is a retired person on social security and she cannot do this. this will be a program that can benefit people who are also

falling through the cracks with medicare part d. or other insurance issues. at least during the period where we can then resolve those issues for them. we are looking forward to working with the department to really work through the nuances of how to make the program efficient and accessible for the clinic for the patients that need it. we are in support of this initiative. thank you. >> chair mandelman: thank you. next speaker. >> good morning. i and the c.e.o. of the san francisco community clinic consortium. our organization represents 11 of the nonprofit community health centres in san francisco. collectively, our members serve 113,000 san francisco residents which is about ten% of the population. we also serve about 4200 healthy san francisco people and 46,000

other enrollees. our organization serves two functions. one is a common voice for the health centres under our umbrella organization and the second one i will speak to them just a moment. in terms of the 11 health centres that operate throughout san francisco, with a quick survey out to them, they reported back that they have difficulty obtaining search and medication vaccines and medications and also inhalers, particularly for the healthy san francisco population. they also work to cover creams and ointments for people who have psoriasis and other issues where these medications might not be around and the expectation is patients will pay for them out of their own pocket which is very hard for them to come up with. the second charge of the san francisco community clinic consortium as we have our mobile street outreach -- outreach van. this service does urgent medical services throughout san

francisco. we serve about 1,000 patients. we do that in conjunction with the department of public health and this particular van, normally treats infections and injuries and illness. so we have need for antibiotics, also epinephrine pens and other things that our patients on the streets need to have in a more urgent service in order to take care of their treatment. again inhalers came up again as a medication that we need to. we would like to support this very important ordinance. thank you. >> chair mandelman: thank you. are there any more speakers? anyone from the public who would like to speak? come on up. >> excuse me. my name is scott. on the cofounder of clinic by

the bay. i just want to ask for your support of this ordinance. thank you. >> chair mandelman: thank you. anymore public speakers? seeing none, public comment is now closed. the item is before us. is there a motion? >> supervisor ronen: i would like to thank you, supervisor safai for this legislation. it sounds amazing. what an innovative program and a win win for everyone. if you could add me as a cosponsor i would really appreciate that and i want to thank everyone for the amazing work on this. what a great piece of legislation. with that, i will make a motion, sorry. i will wait to make my motion. >> chair mandelman: thank you. i wanted to say some closing things. just for points of clarification >> supervisor safai: think of hospices and nursing homes and senior living centres.

essentially what ends up happening is tons of medication goes unused. once they are, they go to a fair party and we need to screen them for additional screening. i want to be clear there is no opioid involved in this program. it is not hard medication. is a kind of thing that people need on a daily basis. my son uses an inhaler. these things are life changing. they are expensive. we don't have the ability to get them. after ghost of the third-party, it goes to the free medical clinic. it is watched and monitored every step of the way. after we are done with this legislation, it goes to the full support of the board. the department of public health and the consortium of free clinics and a number of other entities are going to sit down and talk about the implementation so they can find

a formula and figure out how they will put this into effect in san francisco. so they're still a few questions that need to be answered and i know that the free clinics are deeply invested in this and this is something that will make them that much more of a strong service delivery. i wanted to thank a few other people that were mentioned today i know dr catherine kobe was very much involved in clinic by the bay. david goldschmidt from clinic by the bay. dr patel from the department of public health. and of course, our chief pharmacy officer who spoke here today. mr david's words. -- mr david woods. there are so many other people to whom i am thankful. our city attorneys. as much as this sounds straightforward, there were some nuances in the meeting with the state definition and seeing how we could implement this. the city attorney's office did a

phenomenal job in helping ensure that this was a well-crafted piece of legislation. and then individuals from santa clara county board of supervisors. they were our points of contact down there. and then the california state board pharmacy, laura hendricks. there were a lot of people who were involved in putting this piece of legislation together. but i always like to say is we don't always have the ideas. we don't always originate to the ideas and think about policy. and often times the best ideas come from the community. i want to thank the folks who brought this to our attention. we have, in my office some controversial things, recently but i'm hoping this is not controversial at all and this is something that will be encouraged by everybody. it is something that is well needed. thank you to everyone who came out today and thank you for all your hard work in helping to make this happen and thank you for your time.

i urge full support. >> supervisor ronen: i will make a motion to send this item forward with positive recommendation. >> thank you. >> chair mandelman: thank you. mr. clerk, do we have any further items? >> there is no further business. >> chair mandelman: and then we adjourned.

>> president cohen: good morning, ladies and gentlemen. welcome back to the budget and finance committee. i'm malia cohen, the chair. our clerk is miss linda wong. are there any announcements? >> yes. please silence all cell phones

and electronic devices. items acted upon today will appear on the october 16 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> president cohen: thank you very much. could you please call item number one. >>clerk: yez. item one, item authorizing the public utilities commission -- each with an agreement amount not to exceed 14 million and each with a term not to exceed ten years from january 1, 2019 to december 31, 2019. >> good morning. i have a very short presentation. can i have the slides, please. >> president cohen: good morning. >> thank you. just as a kwiquick reminder, th contracts are to supplement or staff to conduct work primarily on the watershed lands outside

of the san francisco. we're the second biggest land holder in alameda county, second largest in santa clara. there's a lot of property. we have very specific requirements in some cases to monitor and maintain these areas, especially our mitigation sites for your capital improvement program, and a bulk of the contract authority we're seeking is to support those efforts. we were here at this committee in april to extend our contract service we had at the time, cs-211. we promised we would be back, and here we are. we said we would issue a new r.f.p. and bring on a new contracting authority to continue this work. a lot of the work goes on in perpetuity. we received four proposals, and selected three teams.

all this was very well presented in the staff report. thank you for all of that hard work, and we're here to seek your approval to move forward so we can have additional contracting authority to continue our staff work. we'd be happy to answer any questions. >> president cohen: thank you. appreciate that. i don't have any questions. do any of my colleagues? i think the contract is pretty straightforward. we'll here from the budget analyst. >> severin campbell. the contracts are each $14 million or $42 million over ten years for the three contracts. page three of our report, table two, shows estimated spending by year, the p.u.c. thinks that given the expending plan that they'll spend most of the funds over the first eight years of

the contract, and we 'em are approval. >> president cohen: thank you for that. i still see no questions from my colleagues. we'll go to public comment at this time. is there any member of the public that would like to comment on item one? seeing none, public comment is closed. [ gavel ]. >> president cohen: colleagues, is there a motion to send to the full board with a positive recommendation? all right. we'll take that without objection. thank you. [ gavel ]. >> president cohen: madam. >>clerk: clerk item 2, item retroactively approving a contract for behavioral health services for children and families in an amount not to exceed approximately 36.5 million for a contract term of four years from july 1, 2018 to june 30, 2022 with one five-year option to extend. >> president cohen: thank you. we've got michelle ruggles from the department of public health to make a presentation.

good morning. >> yeah. so this is one of our contracts that we are bringing forward to you. it's an ongoing services provided by family service agency, but we conducted multiple solicitations and out of four of them, these are the services that they were awarded and are continuing. you can see that there is about 12 service category programs. they have a strong focus on older adults, reaching out to monolingual clients who may feel isolated in their ability to reach out and get care. they also have children to programs. any way, they have the whole range of programs. each year, we do a monitoring. our -- we have a team that goes out. they monitor at each program location facility, and all the programs that are at -- at that address, so each of those,

essentially, in your list gets a separate program monitoring, which we do to ensure that they are achieving their objectives, and i can say for the last completed report in '16-'17, they demonstrated outstanding performance on all of their objectives. as a system, what we're looking at for this type of program is, for example, we require all clients to get an annual needs assessment -- i mean, to get a needs assessment when they begin, and then, it's repeated so that we can measure progress of the client towards meeting their treatment plan. we also have a goal that all clients who request treatment have -- are offered an appointment within ten days. we look toward measuring the success of the treatment by measuring who had rescidivism t an acute psychiatric inpatient

episode within 30 days of discharge. within the program, we measure did they deliver the needs assessment to all 100% of clients, and then, digging down deeper, great, they did that, and, which they did do that 100%, but they also have objectives which measure improvement within the scale, so it's not just did you do it, but are the clients getting better? so for each one of these programs, there's common objectives and then there's unique objectives that pertain to the age group that's being treated. and so as -- again, just to repeat, we measure each of those annually, and in our last completed year, they demonstrated outstanding performance in virtually every category, and we agree with the budget analyst's

recommendations. >> president cohen: great. thank you. appreciate that, 'cause i think we will go to the budget legislative analyst at this point. so miss campbell, this is a resolution for a contract between d.p.h. and family services agencies for our behavioral health services for children and families. what are your thoughts? >> so this contract was selected through a competitive process in 2017. there is an interim contract in place pending approval of this contract. this contract is retroactive to july 1, 2018. it will replace the interim contract once it's approved. our budget for the contract is shown on page 8. it's about 8.1 million a year, or 36 million over the four year term of the contract. it's funded through both state and local general funds and we recommend approval. >> president cohen: all right. thank you. and it sounds like, miss ruga

ruggles, in the department of public health, they're in agreement with you at this time. we'll take public comment. anyone wishing to speak, come up. >> this is a good program. it helps families, and it helps children, but i want to point out to you that the success of this program could be a lot higher and more beneficial to everybody involved if you provided housing for the people who you're trying to treat. you set the income requirements for families of low-income and very low-income back at people where they can get permanent housing and not recycle in and out of your shelter systems and these navigation systems where they have permanent housing accommodation with their disabilities and the treatment of their behavior situations,

which is a negative impact, and their impact in their lives would be easier to manage if you had permanent housing. you set the requirement at the a.m. i. at a requirement equal to their income where they have opportunity to apply to be a tenant, and all the apartment buildings that's being built in san francisco, you have better success and a lower race of homeless people out in the streets. sincerely. and about taking an inventory and setting the median of the incomes in the communities. these developers are not being fair. i appreciate and respect the line of questions that cohen had when she asked, how did you come about the median income for the neighborhood, when the truth of the matter is that the calculations was only made by people in the community who are in high income brackets, and you didn't include the calculation of the income of the lower level

people incomes which make you have a median of about $90,000 a year, which is not true, sincerely. >> president cohen: are there any other members of the public to speak? seeing none, public comment is closed. [ gavel ]. >> president cohen: all right. i'll make a motion to accept the b.l.a. amendment and make a motion to send to the full board -- >>clerk: madam chair, i believe the b.l.a. does not have any recommendations. >> it turns out the legislation was changed to already include the retroactivity. >> president cohen: all right. thank you. thank you, madam clerk. well, let's make a motion to approve and send to the full board with a positive recommendation, and we will take that without objection. [ gavel ]. >> president cohen: okay. item three, please. >>clerk: item number three, resolution authorizing the mayor's office of housing and community development to execute a grant application which provides funding for counties to develop multifamily housing

specifically for persons with serious mental illness who are homeless, chronically homeless or at risk of chronic homelessness. >> president cohen: all right. thank you. we've got amy chan from the mayor's office of housing to present. welcome. >> good morning, chair cohen and supervisors fewer and stefani. so item three is a resolution that authorizes the mayor's office of housing and community development to apply for the no place like home program. it's developing housing specifically for persons with serious mental health illness for homeless, chronically homeless or at risk of chronic homelessness. the $20 million in noncompetitive funding will be available to each county

proportionately's housing count. they will award funds based on the approval of documents submitted to the county with the county's application. san francisco expects to receive an allocation of about $100 million. as part of the application, h.c.d. requires that the county submits a resolution from the local governing body that authorizes the county to apply for funds. as such, that resolution allows mohcd to apply, and it will allow us to receive and an center our allocation of funds with h.c.d.'s approval. we are requesting some amendment language today because h.c.d. issued new instructions yesterday that require resolutions to include very specific language that references state code. this language does not make any substantive changes. it basically references this code section and requirements under the no place like home

program, and we're asking the committee to accept the amendments and to forward the item to the full board with a positive recommendation, and i have copies of the marked up amendments for the committee members. thank you. >> president cohen: thank you, miss chan. the language amendments that you're passing out, it's just to ensure that the application complies with the state grant requirements, is that right? >> yes, that's correct. >> president cohen: okay. is there anything else that you want to highlight for us? >> no, that's it. >> president cohen: okay. thank you. there is no budget legislative analyst's report. thank you. we will go to public comment on item three. >> this, too, is a good program and an example how in order for it to be a success, when you calculate the amount of money that the tenant must be charging rent, you must be sure that no price fixing is done.

sf, viewer, please. >> president cohen: any other member of the public? oh . >> here's a true and correct copy of the income brackets. the people who you trying to help are mostly on social security benefits, the program that's called s.s.i., when you have a mental disability and a chronic mental disability, a combination of both mental and physical disabilities, these people in these income brackets are on the scale at 20% and 45% of the area median. every apartment building complex that the city publicizes that's affordable housing, the lowest income you start, you target a minimum of 55% of that median income scale, which is 44,400. these people who you trying to help are not eligible to apply because their income is below

these two arrows where the income bracket starts. these are the very low and low-income bracket incomes of the people who all of you want to help, but yet, when you have the housing opportunity, you always start the median affordable housing at 100%. you set 100% affordable housing, and then, you claim that the median is the starting price. and that's 80,700 a year. people in the low-income brackets are not making this type of money peryear and don't even have the housing opportunity to apply. and a good example of that is mission rock. it's supposed to be 15% for low-income and low-income bracket people. that means 225 of those apartments are supposed to be for low -- [inaudible] >> president cohen: thank you. seeing no other public comment, public comment is closed. [ gavel ].

>> president cohen: the matter is in the hands of the body. any questions, colleagues? i think this is real straightforward. all right. i'll make a motion to approve and send to the full board with a positive recommendation. i'd also like to note that i'd like to send it as a committee report? >>clerk: madam chair, would you like to accept the amendment proposed by miss chan? >> president cohen: yes, as amended. do you have a question, supervisor? okay. [ gavel ]. >> president cohen: thank you. item four. >>clerk: item number four, resolution declaring the intent of the city to reimburse expenditures from proceeds of future bond indebtedness and authorizing the mayor's office of housing and community development to submit an application to the california debt limit allocation committee to permit the issuance of residential market revenue bonds in an aggregate principle amount not to exceed 7 million for 411 eddy street. >> item before you is for eastern park, located at 711

eddy street. this is a project that the northern california presbyterian homes and services will be acquiring and rehabbing. this consistents of 2 -- consists of 212 units, and the rehabilitation work will include window replacement, mechanical heating system upgrade and rehab of the units and common areas. this authorizes the mayor's office of housing development to execute up to $95 million in multifamily revenue note to finance the project. this is conduit financing that will not require the city to pledge any funds for the repavement of the bonds -- repayment of the funds, and we're asking the committee to forward this to the full board with a positive recommendation. thank you. >> president cohen: thank you. appreciate that. let's go to public comment, item four. >> this is another example of

the discriminatory practices and tricking devices that i'm demonstrating before you for a long period of time. now she just testified that the new republic built complex which is in the tenderloin area, the lowest income is 50% of the area medium. that means in order to be a tenant in this building, you have to make -- can you focus that a little clearer so you can see? that's not coming in too clear. >> president cohen: we can see it clearly. >> 40% of the median is $40,350, so that means that all the income brackets that are between these two area points is not being included in the conclusionary rule to be a tenant in the building. that's discrimination. okay. so you're deep and involved in your discrimination that you discriminate against people that's the same narcotic on

yourself. i can't get you discrimination based on race, but i can get you on constitutional law pertaining to due process and equal protection under the law. that's not equal protection under the law, price fixing. the requirement to be a tenant in the building to start at an income bracket that you know good and well, the most vulnerable people in the city don't have that income and can't even put an application to be a tenant in the building. and this building that you're proposing is in the tenderloin area, and you call it gentrification. it's not gentrification, it's discrimination based on geographical location and you're harming and displacing people of color. you did the same thing in the western addition with that justin hermann pulling that nonsense. you tried it in the mission district, and you're doing it again. then, when you get concrete information claiming that the low-income people supposed to be part of the program like at mission rock, you call about 40% affordable housing, but yet, you

make the lowest income will require to be a -- [inaudible] >> president cohen: thank you. any other member of the public? all right. seeing none, public comment is closed. all right. colleagues, i don't know if there's any discussion. okay. i have no questions. i'll make a motion to approve and send to the full board with a positive recommendation as a committee report. thank you. without objection. [ gavel ]. >> president cohen: please call items five and six [agenda item read] [agenda item read] >> president cohen: okay. so we've got supervisor mandelman and mayor breed as sponsors of this legislation, and bill present.

bl [agenda item read] >> president cohen: mr. blum. >> would you like me to speak first? i'm actually speaking on the care site, item number six, would you like to do that -- >> president cohen: both of them have been called together, it doesn't matter which goes first. >> okay. i'll speak to six, and my colleague, john can speak to five. first of all, good morning, good to see you all supervisors, fewer, cohen, and stefani. so i'm asking you to approve a resolution for a grant for hiv or hiv funding for the ryan white part a. san francisco has applied for on a yearly basis and received this

for about 30 years. we're one of about 60 geographic areas around the united states that apply for it. as you know there's over 15,000 people living with hiv in san francisco, slightly less than half of them, about 7400 actually touch our public health system at one point or another, and well over 3,000 get primary care services. the amount requested is 105% of last year's application, which is the maximum we're allowed to apply for. over the last 30 years, we've received some cuts, some big, some small, with occasional flat funding. i want to thank all the supervisors current and past. you've done a great job of supporting us. of that funding, about 92.5% will come to san francisco. we are what's called an eligible met poli

metropolitan area, which means that three counties are grouped together by the feds. that includes marin and san mateo, so i'll stop there. >> good morning. my name's john melicar, and i'm with chip. chip is a branch within the population health division that is primarily responsible for h.i.v. presentation funds -- prevention funds. we've received funds for this for about 30 years. these funds are only offered to help departments through funding opportunity 181802. it comes in two different components. the first component is one that is in a grant form, and that we were -- we did not have to apply for, we just had to explain our services. it's changed in two ways from io