in my district which was a fourth story, $61,000 -- 61 square thousand -- 61,000 square feet building. the planning commission approved a change of use to convert this existing industrial space to office space. however, despite the fact that there would be immense change to traffic and a new influx of workers due to a new office building on this corridor, this project did not trigger required streetscape improvements under section 130 a .2 of the planning code. being that the building was adjacent to a freeway on-ramp where there is a lack of sidewalks and the lack of pedestrian safety features, this triggered the concern of many residents live in the south beach south of market area. that began the work of re envisioning the better streets

plan which passed in 2015 which gave the city the ability to acquire large developments to make improvements to the public right-of-way. however, we did not consider a major change of use in existing buildings and how to trigger a requirement to improve public right-of-way in those instances. over the last three years, we have discovered other areas where the spirit or intent of this ordinance was not captured in a number of different projects around the city. the ordinance we see today it does a number of things. at right sizes the trigger by which the planning department may require or can now require development projects to make street and sidewalk improvements , alongside supervisor yee and myself, the initiative of achieving vision zero over the next ten years here in san francisco, that is actually now seven years in san francisco. it will also enable staff to more effectively implement the

better streets plan and improve safety for people walking, biking but also taking public transit here in san francisco. the plan does a number of things beyond modifying the trigger. also expands the list of streetscape features a city can require developers to build which include extended bull backs, a raised crosswalks and alleys and intersection daylighting. we also clear up where conflicting sidewalk with -- exist allowing the city to acquire the greater of the two widths. also will finally outright ban curb cuts of certain streets like market street and other key pedestrian oriented corridors and also ban curb cuts at bus stops. people shouldn't be driving through bus stops where pedestrians are waiting to take the bus. we also require conditional use authorization to determine if a curb cut will be granted on other corridors as well.

this includes all neighborhood commercial districts and most zoning districts on key corridors but will not require a.c.u. and rh one, rh three, p.d.r. and sally. we also continue to eliminate offstreet parking requirements for projects on restricted streets and colleagues, as you may have heard, i have introduced amendments that are not in this ordinance today that would eliminate minimum parking requirements completely, citywide. that is on a substitute -- that is on a duplicated file that will come before the board in the next couple weeks. it is not in this file that is before the board of supervisors today. i really want to give a huge shout out to paul, are senior urban planner at the planning department who really has painstakingly worked on this ordinance for two and a half years with my office. i'm so glad it is finally before

the board of supervisors today and i want to recognize neil, the manager at the san francisco planning department. thank you to sfmta and public works who have worked in reviewing the ordinance but a big shout out to alice, one of our community residents in south beach at south park who notified our office at 340 bright at how it did not trigger changes to ensure vision zero and cathy at, at walk s.f.,, tom at livable city and janice with the bike coalition. i want to thank john who made sure that this file was ready to be passed today. colleagues, i ask for your support and hope to gain your support in the next couple weeks from when we had the duplicated file come back to the board of supervisors. >> i want to go on record that we will have to talk about this. i'm concerned about what you're proposing. it sounds like it will be eliminating parking across the entire city for all new building and construction. is that right? >> he does not ban or prohibit

parking being built in the development, it just eliminates developers requirements to build parking. developers can continue to provide parking on site and in fact, we have eliminated minimum parking requirements in the district that i represent. for the project sponsor still continues to come to the board and planning commission with parking in their building. they will continue to be incentivized by whatever the market demands. we will no longer force developments to build parking if they do not wish to do so. we have largely emulated parking requirements in much of the city and we also allow developments ways out of building parking by providing bike parking instead of vehicular parking. this would completely clean that part of the code and not required a developer to build parking if they do not wish to. that is not in the ordinance that is before us today. >> i know. you gave me heartburn.

if you don't require developers to do anything, they won't do it on the south east of san francisco, we have a lot of seniors and children and people who drive. >> as i said, we have eliminated parking requirements in the district that i represent an developers continue to build parking in their development because many projects are not feasible without some parking. however, i think that where we are in the city today, we have moved beyond that. you will probably continue to see parking proposed in projects in your district and probably throughout the outer outskirts of san francisco, as well. i do think there are a number of developments in my district and in the central area that are well served by public transit that don't need parking. it would make building housing more affordable if you don't have to build parking and would make housing more affordable to folks that are renting and buying it. i look forward to the debate at land use committee and at the board of supervisors. >> ok. is there anyone else who would like to comment on this?

supervisor kim, did you make amendments to this legislation? yes, no. can we take this same house same colloquy this ordinance passes on the first reading. >> item 21 is a resolution determining the transfer of a type 20 off stale beer and wine liquor license to 711 located at 195 pine street district three will serve the public convenience and necessity and require positions on the issuance of the license. >> madame clark. i want to call your attention to the time. >> it is 2:30 pm. >> we will revisit item 21. >> they 2:30 pm commendations, i believe we have four. >> i did not hear you. >> that 2:30 pm commendations. i believe there are four. you do have the first one. >> i do.

is ms. miss helen owens in the chamber today? come on up. colleagues, i want to introduce you to a good friend of mine and a mentor. this is a talented, beautiful human being. an author, a mother, a small business owner. her name is helen ellen. she is a native san franciscan. she has dedicated her life to healthy women by showing them how to harness their -- no, know , no. [laughter] >> into the microphone. [laughter] >> hi. >> it's ok. wait, i'm not done. >> oh, ok. >> i will give an introduction and then you will say some things and then we will applaud and we will take a picture. >> ok. >> rh. back to my notes. she is on point, as you can see. definitely excited and eager. she is teaching women how to harness their -- harness their personal power and heal their minds and the soul and their

spirit. she is a veteran motivational speaker and she personally taylor's her storytelling to her audience using perfectly measured accommodation of grace, of humour, of comedy which, is really true compassion. she has overcome obstacles related to severe dyslexia and hair loss as well as she has been recognized for mentoring women on how to emerge strong, particularly when they are emerging from turbulent situations. miss helen owens is a contributor to three books and a first-time author of finding out what she compass. fifteen life lessons for women for -- waging towards restoration, reconstruction and renewal. she is the host and moderator of that she compass show where interview members and audiences have reported a true sense of sisterhood when listening to her inspirational talks. she is the winner of the

distinguished national shining star. an award presented by veterans internationally known from a cosmetics company. and accolades given to women committed to improving their community and uplifting the lives of others. she is also a nominee and finalist in the public service for city lights magazine's top ten influential african-americans in the bay area. she has been focused on local media. i am telling you. this is an incredible human being we have before us. i would like to end with a quote by helen. she says to have the power to rewrite --dash we may not have the power to rewrite our childhood. my note to my younger self reminds me that despite what is written in our past, our future is always a story we have the power to tell. please welcome helen owens and

thank you for your courage and your leadership. >> you are so welcome. >> thank you. [applause] >> thank you, so much for this. i. i grew up in san francisco in district ten at harness point. this is what i would like to say to young people who don't feel like they may be able to make it in this world. it is not where you come from. is where you are headed to and where you are going. i was able to start a small business, a multimillion dollar business all by myself. i was a teenage mother and raised two children in san francisco and two brilliant children on my own. let's see. you have me all emotional. i would like to say to any woman , we can do it. we just have to work hard and stay focused and believe in

yourself. thank you so much for today. thank you so much. [applause] >> i thank you are next. >> ok. is paula here? come on up.

all right, everybody. paula is such a strong young woman. she moved to san francisco with her mother and siblings from guadalajara, mexico as a teenager. by 14, she was a self identified community organizer who was determined to consider a career as an activist. she served on the traditional age youth advisory board with a true colours -- where she worked on a toolkit to help help serve underrepresented lgbtq youth. she represented district a and focus on advocating for black and brown youth in our city. earlier this year, she authored a motion honoring a man who was

a 19-year-old young man shot by the police in the mission district and brought his family to the youth commission where his life could be celebrated. i met paula last year at the improvement club's annual block party. just one week earlier. her sister had been murdered in an active domestic violence a block away from where the event took place. i was struck by her composure and moved that despite her grief , she was already fiercely advocating to make sure something like this didn't happen again. she spoke with me that day about the need for more resources for victims of domestic violence and help them escape abusive relationships and avoid the tragedy that befell her sister. in the months following her sister's death, while also helping to care for her young niece, paula continued her advocacy and speaking openly to the present with community members about the need for increased funding for victim services. i am so grateful to have the opportunity to thank her for her tremendous work for immigrant

and lgbtq communities. i am honored and moved to be able to thank her for her courage and for taking the unspeakable tragedy that she and her family experience and using it as motivation to advocate for victims and survivors here in san francisco. thank you, paula. [cheering] [applause] >> thank you. [laughter] >> thank you. my name is paula and and i am an advocate and advocate -- i -- activist. i work locally and internationally on women possess issues. so no other girl, woman or child will experience it. i wanted to advocate the honor

of this commencement for my sister that was a victim of domestic violence. lastly, i want to thank you for your commitment and determination. thank you. [♪] [applause] >> supervisor stefani, you are next.

>> thank you. colleagues, today we have with us the president of the san francisco gaming course and one of their members, a first tenor. dave was with us a few months ago when supervisor tang honored him for his organ donation and we were all treated to their chorus and their song. it was one of the most incredible days in this chamber. i met dave in 2014 when we were both training for our first triathlon and at that time, i will never forget him singing in the back of a van on our way to the hotel and he was talking about trying out for the gay man 's chorus. he did and now he is part of it. he has introduced me to the gay man's chorus and their performances i will never miss.

the holiday performance is something that has become a tradition in my family and like i have sent, if you have not seen silent night done in sign by them, you have not lived. never cut that out of the program. >> it is coming back. >> ok, good. dave e-mailed me recently and told me about the 40th anniversary. i immediately reached out to supervisor mandel meant and he did something on friday and he will be speaking out as well. i have been so inspired by this group. a community-based cultural and social institution that began and inspires international lgbtq coral movements more than 40 years ago. born on the steps of san francisco city hall in 1970 a, on the evening of may or moscone he and supervisor harvey milk's assassination, they have spent the past four decades responding to intolerance and human rights issues in our community with the

healing power of music. since its founding, hundreds of lgbtq choruses have started across the world and new ones continue to form each year. in addition to being a globally recognized arts organization capped the chorus is also a strong advocate for progressive social, cultural change and spreading the message of love and acceptance around the world. during these times, this message and the chorus' love are needed, now more than ever. the power of music to bring hope to people, to heal people, and to unite people his universal. we know that in just over this past weekend, i gathered with supervisor madeleine on saturday night at the contemporary juice museum and we gathered in song to him on the loss of those that died at the hands of gun violence at the tree of life synagogue. we united on sunday at the

interfaith visual. uniting in song at the end singing "let it be." knowing music has the power to heal. i want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. for the love and hope you bring into this world through your angelic voices, your future hearts, and your commitment madeleine to spreading love and acceptance across the country and the entire world. thank you, so much. [applause] >> thank you. supervisor mandelman. >> it is fantastic when other supervisors take some of the pressure off the gay staff. [laughter] >> i do want to pipe in and add. i am personally a fan of the gay man's chorus and as i said on saturday at the grove, the story

of the gay man's chorus is the story of the lgbtq community in san francisco. and the mixture of tragedy and overcoming tragedy that is characterizing the community and is a strength of the communities reflective in the history of this chorus. the first performance was the night of milk's assassination. as it was growing and building and spreading courses throughout the lands, it was also the members of the chorus who were battling an epidemic that was wiping out so many of its members over time. and even just this month, as the chorus prepared for its 40th anniversary celebration, the daughter of the artistic director died and i wanted to express all of our condolences for that. i am so proud of the chorus and i am so proud of the beauty you bring to our community and they also want to thank you and thank

supervisor stefani for giving them the appropriate recognition that they deserve. thank you. >> members of the board to, thank you so much for this incredible commendation. today is the 40th anniversary of the very first rehearsal of the game and's chorus. the birth of the chorus. dave and i would not be where we are, our city, our country, our world would not be where we were not for those 100 men who came to that rehearsal for two years ago. we thank you from the bottom of our hearts. from our then mayor and mayor feinstein to mayor breed who was with us on saturday for our birthday celebration. the amount of support that we have in this community compared to our brothers and sisters around the world is immeasurable i will end with some reverent words from our 44th president

of the united states. we are the ones that we have been waiting for. those men from 40 years ago where the ones that we were waiting for. we hope to be the ones, that in 40 years, our generations are the ones that they were waiting for. thank you very much. [applause] >> thank you. congratulations! all right. the next person to offer a presentation is supervisor ronen she will be honoring officer percy hernandez today for his years of service in the portola. depending on where you are from. >> you are from there so you should know how to pronounce it. officer hernandez, do you want to come to the podium? [cheers and applause] >> i have been waiting to honor you for so long, officer

hernandez. it was only when there was a threat that we were going to lose you from the portola that i said we have to honor him right now. i am so happy you are staying. you have no idea. thank goodness he did not take to those motorcycles. i am so happy about that. you are the beloved, 11 year beat officer in the portola. i personally don't ever want to leave you from -- lose you from that pollute disposition but i believe you should be a top trainer of all foot beat officers in the city because i don't know any officer who does their job better than you. you truly know the people of the portola. you agree to residents and shopkeepers by name. you know their stories and their background and their histories. you are respected by everyone in

the neighborhood and you even learned some basic chaney's so you can communicate in the native language -- some basic chinese so you can communicate with the native language of the residents in the portola. they love when they speak to you in chinese. i see their faces light up. i see the connection that you have with them even though there is this language barrier. that is something that i haven't seen with other officers that is unique to you. the people of the portola know you love them and those know you love them and are with them. you not only are incredible in providing basic safety in the neighborhood but you also performed exemplary investigative work. you are essential to solving two major cases in the portola. a bank robbery and a case were hateful anti- chinese graffiti was painted on several walls in the neighborhood. because you know the people of the neighborhood so well, you

are able to identify and apprehend both suspects in both cases based on evidence provided in security camera videos. officer hernandez, you are known and renowned for your kindness, compassion and good nature. you exemplified the best of the san francisco police department as a community-based beat cop. police officers like you keep the fabric of our neighborhood intact and improve the quality of life of all individual residents, families catch communities, organizations and businesses. just to tell a little bit about your background, your warning guatemala and emigrated to the united states when you're 12 years old. he is the youngest of a siblings his oldest sun is 28 years old and saves in the army. currently deployed in korea and his younger sun is 26 years old and is recently finishing his service in the u.s. navy. in 20 -- in 2004, he realized his lifelong dream of becoming a

police officer for the sfpd and trained in the tenderloin and then was assigned to the bayview station and never left. thank goodness. in 2007, he was assigned to the foot patrol and has been the beloved beat cup -- beat cop ever since. thank you so much for everything that you do. your community loves and appreciates you. [applause] [please stand by]

>> to me, that's the -- that's the biggest thing that could -- best work i could have done in my life, changing someone's life -- at least one, but that touched me, and i want to thank you all for this opportunity.

thank you very much. [applause] >> president cohen: thank you. [applause] >> president cohen: congratulations. >> thank you. >> president cohen: all right. thank you. thank you for your service, all of you. all right, folks, this concludes our portion of the agenda where we do the commendations, and i'd

like to pivot back to item 21. i think item 21 is fairly self-explanatory. madam clerk, do we need to reread it or recall it? >>clerk: it's already been called. it's on the floor. >> president cohen: all right. colleagues, is there any discussion on item 21? colleagues, can we take this same house, same call. without objection, this resolution is adopted. madam clerk, could we please move to the 3:00 p.m. special order. >>clerk: yes. the first 3:00 p.m. is our items 27 through 30. they're hearing and motions regarding the appeal on the ceqa issued by the planning department.

ce . >> president cohen: thank you very much. so colleagues, we have before us today one appeal for the final environmental impact report for the washington square water conservation project in supervisor peskin's district. before considering these appeals, supervisor peskin has a conflict of interest with this project and would thus like to be excused. may i have a motion to excuse supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: madam chair, just before the motion is made, the conflict is i own real property within 500 feet of washington square and therefore as a matter of law am required to recuse myself. >> president cohen: thank you. made by supervisor kim and seconded by supervisor yee. without objection, supervisor

peskin is excused. supervisor fewer, would you like to make a few remarks? >> supervisor fewer: yes, thank you supervisor. i would like to make a motion to continue this item to the next board meeting on oct-8, 2018. >> president cohen: all right. thank you very much. and seeing that there are no names on the roster, colleagues, this matter can be continued. let's open it up for public comment on the continuance. again, ladies and gentlemen, we're opening up public comment on the continuance. are there any members of the public would would like to speak on the continuance only? all right. seeing none, public comment is closed. seeing no other speakers for public comment, may i have a motion to continue this appeal? may i have a motion to continue this appeal to november 13, 2018? a motion made by supervisor fewer, seconded by supervisor -- supervisor kim, thank you. without objection, items 27

through 30 are continued until november 13 broord meeting. thank you. madam clerk, please call the next special order. >>clerk: items 31 through 34 and they're hearing and motions regarding a community plan evaluation by the planning department under ceqa issued on may 30, 2018 for the proposed project at 2750 19th street, approved on august 23, 2018 to demolish three existing industrial buildings, retain a principle two story facade and construct a 68'6" story mixed use building with approximately 10,000 square feet of ground floor p.d.r., 60 residential units above and bicycle parking in the basement with item 32 conditionally finding the -- approving the determination, item 33, reversing the

determination. >> president cohen: as a reminder, these appeals involve analysis of adequacy, sufficiency, completeness of the final environmental impact report. we will begin as follows. first, up to ten minutes for the appellant, and the appellants are our mission no eviction. the appellants will describe the grounds for their appeal. two minutes for public commenters to speak. these are commenters that are speaking in support of the appeal, and then, we will have a ten-minute presentation for justin horner from the planning department to present his analysis of the -- certified e feir, and then, there will be a ten minute presentation from the sponsor, and another two minutes

for public commenters to speak that are in support of the affirmation of the environmental impact report, and then finally, the appellant will have up to three minutes for a rebuttal argument. and i think colleagues, without objection, we can get started. [ gavel ]. >> president cohen: the public hearing is now open. i'd like to take a couple minutes to give a few opening remarks. i've had an opportunity to meet with both the project sponsor and the appellant involved in the appeal. just for reference, this is a mixed-use development comprised of three existing industrial buildings which will be turned into approximately 10,000 square feet of ground floor p.d.r. space. it will retain a principle two story facade and construct a six story mixed-use building with 60 residential units above with bicycle and vehicle parking in the basement. i'm looking forward to this particular hearing.

seeing that there are no names on the roster from my colleagues, i will now ask the appellant to come forward. come forward, and to present their case, and just as a reminder, you'll have up to 15 minutes -- excuse me. you'll have ten minutes. please introduce yourself, and welcome. >> thank you. my name is lariss pedruncella, and this is lisa kelly, and we are with our mission no eviction. technology. >> president cohen: all right. maybe we should pause your time. are you ready? >> yes. we check it had earlier. >> president cohen: okay. let's start the time again at the top of the ten-minute timer. all right. you may begin. >> thank you. good afternoon, supervisors. our mission no eviction requests that you uphold the appeal of

the planning commission's decision to adopt a community plan exemption and require a project level environmental review prior to further consideration of this project. this project has substantial adverse effects with its low percent of on-site availability, it causes further disproportionate construction of market rate units and will further exacerbate the displacement of working class residents surrounding the project site. this project will further exacerbate traffic congestion, pollution, greenhouse gases and noise as a result of adding provide cars, the heavy use of t.n.c. ride hails, and constant deliveries. added congestion brought by this project will directly endanger pedestrians and bicyclists. with no guarantee to the community for working class

p.d.r. manufacturing, this project will contribute to further displacement of manufacturing businesses and the loss of working class p.d.r. jobs. 2050 -- -- the c.p.e. approval rested on the cumulative impact studies on the western neighborhood's e.i.r. that was done between 2005 and 2008. so what's the problem with this? conditions have significantly changed. substantial new information affecting environmental analysis has become available since the adoption of the plan e.i.r. ceqa guidelines require that comprehensive analysis be done for new issues, and since the community plan evaluation is tiered from the plan i. e.r., it

is imperative that the plan e.i.r. is reliable. if the e.i.r. is missing areas of study, it is no longer viable as a tool for evaluating cumulative impacts. so does this project have impacts that are accumulatively considerable? the eastern neighborhood plans studied three housing projection options and recommended a preferred kwauquantity of 1,696 housing units in the mission from 2008 to 2025. however the study never anticipated the number of more thanes of more than 2,054 in plan c. or the impacts of higher housing production. over 3,000 units have been built or are currently in the pipeline, and we have seven years more to go in the plan. what are the cumulative impacts

of pipeline projects? we don't know. the plan has not cumulatively analysised the effect of this project, the 226 units being built across or the other pipeline projects. as of 2018 quarter two, san francisco has exceeded overall housing production goals. san francisco has exceeded its goals for above moderate income outside housing and built or entitled 218.9% of its planned arena housing production. we do know that our projected housing balance shows that low-income housing productions in d-9 and d-10 are well below targets. there are environmental impacts related to traffic, land use,

health and safety that have not been studied. what are the unforeseen cumulative transportation impacts in unintended increases of automobile ownership of high income earners, displacement commutes of mission families driving back and forth long distances for their jobs and schools, new silicon valley reverse commutes, the advent of t.n.c. ride hails, the advent of services for align meals, groceries that have increased frequency of deliveries to well to do households, and know we see private drivers making drifr res of amazon because traditional dliefr res cannot meet demand. what about shuttles? the e.i.r. did not study

shuttles because they didn't exist at that time. 40% of tech workers in sf use shuttles, and they said they would move closer to their offices outside the city if there were no private shuttles. 69% of no fault evictions have occurred within four block radius of tech bus stops between 2011 and 2013. so why is old methodology being used to calculate transportation impacts? impacts assess were based on outdated motion denied ellig from sf champ and the 2002 s.f. guidelines that did not studied t.n.c.'s. these used a methodology based on analysis by a study done for sf planning in september of 1 1980. delivery vehicle impacts are vastly understated by the

relines on these outdated guidelines, and according to a recent report from the sfcta, 51% of the city's traffic congestion and 51% of e.m.t. measured from 2010 to 2016 is attributed to t.n.c. ride hails. these impacts are particularly acute in urban areas, including the mission, and they throw into question the accuracy of using v.m.t. analysis. a recent global traffic score card shows that as of 2017, san francisco driving is now ranked fifth most congested in the world. are there appropriate community benefits in this project? are there adequate community benefit overall, such as pedestrian-bicycle safety measures, open space, affordable housing production, to offset the cumulative impacts of this project? this project includes bicycle storage for residents, but there

is no adequate bicycle infrastructure to ensure their safety. the san francisco bicycle plan that is used in this c.p.e. was adopted in 2009, before the advent of t.n.c.'s. none of the intersections identified for improvement in the plan e.i.r. were within the vicinity of this project. is there adequate pedestrian infrastructure to support this project? are there adequate loading zones for the constant stream of deliveries and ride hail loading that 60 households will generate? and then, there's the lack of on-site community benefit. the project sponsor has offered the ground floor p.d.r. to the

fi fitzgeralds for 20 years. a there's no guarantee that the site will remain a site with working class p.d.r. jobs, no guarantee that the project sponsor will not try to submit a change of use for this ground floor space, and roll back to their initial retail proposal for this site. there's an unacceptable percentage of on-site affordability. the addition of a single unit at 150% a.m.i. does not contribute to affordablity in this working class neighborhood. and lastly, teaching the joint -- the use of the community to build affordable market rate housing that will cause correct and indirect harm to themselves and their families is not a community benefit. so eastern neighborhood communities deserve better. ceqa requires a cumulative

environmental analysis based on

people who are being appealed to to get away with intentional time delay. you set the requirement to be attendant in the building at 50% of the a.p.i., which comes to about low-income bracket

people and created a loophole and make sure that the only people that benefit is people in high income brackets. >> president cohen: thank you. are there any other members of the public that would like to speak in favor of the appeal? mr. gilberti? >> on the housing side of things, again, last

so the main problem with this project is it will cause direct and indirect harms to the mission community, and these harms haven't been studied. so the city allowed this project to use an outdated e.i.r., and the actual impacts have not been

studied. so how can they be mitigated? the ceqa guidelines require that current circumstances be studied. they were not. so again, no studies were done for the current level of housing development in the mission, and no -- as you heard, cumulative transportation analysis was done, either, and it should be, based on the current transportation modes. so there's no recognition or study of the t.n.c.'s anywhere in the environmental review for the project. so this -- this project will cause adverse effects. it'll -- as you heard, it'll make traffic more congested than it already is. noise, more cars, do we need more cars? more lyfts, more ubers? and above all, the displacement of the community, of the latinx

community who will be driven out by the housing and not enough low-income housing, so i ask you to consider that. >> president cohen: thank you, miss barshak. next speaker? >> i'm here today to speak on behalf of tsupporting the peal for this project. with 326 units already entitled to be built in what we've dubbed the beast on bryant, this mission is experiencing a deluge of market rate clients that are included in this project and the beast on bryant, and there are other units that are coming on-line. what we know is high income wage earns are the ones that occupy these units and the ones most likely to use t.n.c.'s. in a study released, in 2017, an

estimated -- san franciscans took over 75 million trips using ride hailing services. it's not only the most percity, that's the most in raid share density. 60% of t.n.c. users in large cities would have taken public transportation, walked, biked or not made the trip had t.n.c.'s not been available for this trip. finally, they put 2.8 new t.n.c. vehicle miles on the road for each mile of personal vehicle moved, an overall 180% increase in driving on city streets. this project, along with the beast on bryant, is going to contribute -- is already going to significantly contribute to what we already have as a problem in traffic congestion, yet it's also a safety problem.

earlier this year, supervisor ronen met personally with uber and lyft who acknowledged that the problem of crowding and traffic congestion was a problem on valencia street. and it wasn't just traffic, it was a matter of safety.

>> they are analyzing from a study done in 1980. it corrects to the impacts with 60 new absolute majority which will be high income.