extend the reach of the department, of our city's elected officials, of the city's capacity to host visiting nations, visiting cities, del gats from all around the world who are convening in san francisco to talk about the environment, and to learn from us on what we did here on climate action, and the commissioners represented us at events, at talks, at workshops on kind of 0, 80, 100 groups, the paradigm that governs or climate action, and it definitely made sure that we were a gracious environment, but more so, an informed host on the environment. and the commissioner definitely helped the department, the city, and the mayor's global climate action summit here a success. but beyond that, there were other highlights, as well. i know that seems to be the main highlight, but there were a number of special meetings and events that the commission

undertook in order to its regular business. one was the historic meeting between the historic environment and the joint commission on the status of women, and then special reports back on the commission workshops, and then, of course, the actual meeting with the community to show what the final end result was. and then, moving on, other highlights include the department's racial equity initiative, which i'm going to get to on another page. the racial equity initiative is used to work on how the department's programs, policies, and services my intentionally or unintentionally benefit some more than others. the picture you see there is our rally and protest of the trump's decision to repeal obama's clean power plan, and

the commissioners, particularly commissioner hoyos and commissioner ahn, who was one of the emcees for the event, helped make a powerful statement that was instrumental in reducing emissions and was going to be more instrumental in reducing emissions for the future. it was important for san francisco to kind of unite bay area communities, bay area activists, and we did that through the leadership, and we received lots of attention. i know that commissioner bermejo and wan were watching it from mexico, the strong stance against the trump administration. the operation committee setting up various initiatives and approvals throughout the year. and then of course what we saw today, but what we also did

thousand 2018 was recognize the individuals that help empower the commission, that helped us be successful in the environment because as you saw on tomorrow's presentation, it's about collaboration with others, it's about working with others. no matter who it was, we made sure to call out those that helped us succeed on the environment this year, or in previous years, as well. and finally, our legislative summary. the commission has been invaluable at times, championing issues for the city, making sure we're looking at the right issues, pushing legislation kind of overthe finish line if we need to and getting the city on the record like taking a stand on the repeal of the clean power plan or passing a resolution supporting the department's equity initiative by not only helped focus how the department

looks at its work to make sure we're looking at it through the equity angle but was also a model for other city agencies and how they look at their own programs through an equity issue. and in fact our work with the commission on equity was used as a template for the commitment at the global climate action summit. so some of our legislative accomplishments are more than just resolutions. they find themselves being signed onto by other cities or they find themselves being used by other city departments, and so i just wanted to call that out, as well. and that, i believe, is the very comprehensive annual report. >> great report. comments or questions, commissioners? commissioner wan? >> i'm getting really to make a motion when you're ready to ask. >> i just wanted to say thank you to commissioner eddy ahn for the great artwork.

he's done a great job of buttefying the district where i live. they unfailed tveiled the util boxes. thank you for that. it's a great way to highlight artwork. i was looking at the drawings, you even have the raccoons in here. you so often see them in the neighborhood. so thank you for that. and any -- commissioner ahn. >> i love with what mark did with bits and pieces of the art, separating out the bird with the heart above its head. really good work by the department as always in terms of making sure we get the message out there. one small thing that's a substantive edit to include under the clean power plan rally. i think it's mentioning the san francisco public utilities commission. as a department, they were

represented by general manager harl harlan kelly and commissioner viator, so recognizing them for the good work they've done is important, as well >> okay. we can take that and add that in there. that need to be a formal amendment? [inaudible] >> okay. public comment? no? hearing none, we'll have a motion to approve the 2018 annual report. >> as amended. >> as amended. commissioner wald? >> thank you. i think that we have had an extraordinary year. as you said when you began this meeting, and i think this report captures the extraordinary nature of the year very, very well and therefore i move that we approve this draft as amended

for presentation to the mayor in accordance with our applicable law. >> so moved. do we have a second? >> second. >> by commissioner sarah wan. moved and seconded to accept the annual 2018 report as amended. do i -- all in favor? [voting] >> any opposed? a any -- motion passes. next item. >> so in the last couple months, since my last director real estate 's report feels like ages ago.

>> it was last year. >> you heard a couple of things. you heard the award that the school education got from the governor's office. that was wonderful. that was matt rodriguez, the pat of past secretary of -- the past second of cal ed giving us the award. we had a wonderful event, our tree -- tree tipping event, holiday event, it's always amazing how many cameras come out for that. and then, of course, martin luther king day on monday was phenomenal to see the presence of the department of the environment at the celebration. and in terms of what our -- in the last month, we've been working most on as a department is pacific gas and electric, pg&e, is requiring that our energy efficiency program compete with the private sector

for our energy efficiency funds summing through the public goods charges. so that's a huge change for us, and we had to submit a request for abstract, an r.f.a.? so that got put in just a few days ago, and the energy efficiency team was working very, very hard to put that forward, and our assumption is because this is public good charged money that regardless of the bankruptcy, this program and these funds will move forward, but of course, there are questions about that. in the near future, we will be launching the electric vehicle road map for the private sector? we will be convening the electric vehicle working group, which our city departments who either procure vehicles or have something to do with installing infrainstruct t infrastructure, so we've lead a multistakeholder road map, how

do we electrify vehicles. the state of the city address is umm canning up at the end of the month. we hope to have some environmental messages in there. just to put on your calendar, for march, march 13 at 6:30, please, please come join us at cal academy for the green business awards. it's such a wonderful celebration. i would say two of my favorite things that we do to celebrate environmental leadership is one, the green business awards where we're celebrating small business, and the second is the school education awards where we celebrate the students and their teachers and custodians. so those are just super heart warming events to participate in. one is in march, one is in april. so we'll let you know when the school education is, but one march, 6:30 in the evening at

the cal academy will be the green business awards. i am also pleased to say we have been focusing a good deal in the department what does accountability mean, what does 100% accountability mean? where do we work in ways where we work more effectively as teams and can earn the trust and keep the trust of our colleagues. and one of the things that we've been investigating right now is the set of values that we identified when we did the strategic plan a couple of years ago. and pulling those out again and revisiting them, and i'm hoping that perhaps at a commission retreat we can talk about how we bring those things more explicitly into the department.

credibility, collaboration, impact, innovation, and equity. and i'm challenging my senior staff, and i'm challenging everyone in the department to think about how we bring those five values front and center and think about how we overlay them in everything we do, and i would like the commission to join me in that, and what does it mean when we bring those values more explicitly to our work otheas a commission? so that is the -- my thoughts for the coming year for 2019. accountability, effectiveness and our values front and center. and we have a lot of work to get done this year, a lot of important plans that are going to be put forward in the coming year to put us on our path towards our -- those bold goals for greenhouse gas reduction

that were made at the end of last calendar year. we need to get serious, we need to make sure that we're not setting ourselves up for failure. how do we set ourselves up for success. and so with that, do we have any new staff members who are here that want to come up? i don't know that we do. so i think any new staff members, either there are none or they're just not here, but at any rate, that ends my director's report. >> questions, commissioners? any public comment? okay. hearing no public comment, next item, anthony. >> the next item is item 11, nomination and election of commission on the environment president and vice president. this item is for discussion and action. >> so i believe that the

first -- the president first and then the vice president? >> yes. and we take one nomination at a time, and then, we'll -- the commission will vote each nomination -- vote on each nomination one at a time. yeah, and individuals can also nominate themselves or people who are absent. >> commissioner wald? >> i would like to nominate president bermejo to continue as our president. thank you. i think she's done a fabulous job. her enthusiasm, her energy, her commitment to the department and to the commission have all made -- contributed significantly to this wonderful year that we have just finished

talking about, and i'm confident that under her leadership we'll have another great year if she is elected. >> i hope i can count on your vote then. i -- i think i have to say i accept. i humbly accept, and i think this is just a -- the great work of this commission and everything that we do with our director because i think we're like a beautiful orchestra, and we all do really well when we are in sync, and debbie has such a wonderful way of leading us to make us enthusiastic for the work that we do. >> is a second needed on that? >> no, but you can second that. >> i wholeheartedly second that nomination. president bermejo has been

terrific in the last year. in addition for all the work she does for the commission, she's a great spokesperson for the commission. she makes sure that necessary lejs are represented as important measure -- lemgs lation are represent -- legislation are represented as important measures. >> thank you. i just wanted to say that i did the ordinances -- [inaudible] >> -- embellish or try to edit in creative ways, so thank you for that. >> is there any further discussion on this nomination?

>> i'll chime in. i think one of the things that president bermejo does, and i can tell that even in my short time on the commission, she's a great connector. and her positive energy is just obvious, and she made this very new commissioner feel very welcome and very connected, so i'm happy -- i didn't move quick enough so second, so i'm happy to provide a second second. >> okay. thank you, commissioner sullivan. thank you. i appreciate that. >> all right. >> just real quick, if i could, if i could do the third second. i really thank you for your leadership. i really represent the department, especially for the climate conference, and you did a great job, fabulous. i think we have a great team. >> great team. and i'm missing commissioner

hoyos today, but i'm sure we'll channel her in some way. >> okay. is there any public comment on this? seeing none, we'll move onto voting for the nomination of elmy bermejo for president. [roll call] >> the nomination passes. congratulations. [applause] >> all right. >> then our next nomination is for the office of vice president of the commission. commissioner wald? >> thank you again. i would like to nominate commissioner stephenson for this position. i have enjoyed my time as the vice president, but i think that this position is one in

particular that should be circulated on a sort of semi recognize basis through the commission so -- semi regular basis through the commission so that we can all get a closer look at what it means to actually be the head of the commission. and so rather than run again and seek one of you to nominate me, i would like to nominate commissioner stephenson. i think she will work incredibly well with president bermejo. i think she has demonstrated her commitment to the department and the commission over the years. she's learned so much in the years since she's been on the commission. it's been, for me, very gran orien

orien orien oriente -- gratifying to see you get the pleasure out of the work. so it would give me great pleasure if you would accept. >> i accept. i'll never be able to fill your shoes, but i would be happy to be president bermejo's right hand man. >> can i second? i look forward to working with her closer. >> i couldn't agree more. i'm excited to work with commissioner stephenson because i think she brings a different lens in her work in her business. i just think it's an opportunity for us to work closer, and also, i could learn so much from you. >> all right.

seeing no further discussion, is there any public comment on the nomination? seeing none, on the nomination of heather stephenson for vice president on the commission of the environment -- [roll call] >> the nomination passes. congratulations. [applause] >> did anybody besides me notice that the men said aye? >> yeah, i was thinking that, actually. [inaudible] >> i don't either. >> aye, i noticed. >> thank you. i think that we're going to work very hard. we always do, on behalf of san franciscans and the commission, and thank you, debbie, for being our leader on this body. so -- and with that, next item. >> the next item is item 12,

committee reports. this item is for discussion. >> and commissioner wald? we're going to have a report on policy -- policy committee. >> thank you. i'm going to report on our last two meetings one was last year, on december 10. the other one was just last week, i think on january 14. at the december 10 policy committee meeting, we had a presentation from climate program manager wendy goodfriend on the draft san francisco net zero emissions pathway which included a really interesting discussion of our climate goals, the performance of the various sectors and the pathway to net zero, the challenging pathway, i would say, to net zero in san francisco. and we had a presentation by the climate and sustainability

pac on the san francisco progress report on climate and sustainability. we discussed the progress, some of which was extraordinary, of san francisco's various agencies in meeting their climate action goals, and the assistance that is being provided to them by the department. at our most recent meeting in january , we discussed the only report that we approved just a little earlier. we heard from the toxic program manager, jen jackson, and the senior build coordinator, eden bruckman about the collaborations between the department to bring revisions to the green carpet code and the work that's going to go forward involving paint and other products.

have a terrific impact on purchases by the city. and we heard a presentation from building and energy analyst ammon regan and barry hooper about the implementation and upcoming revisions to the san francisco building ordinance, and we learned about the -- not surprisingly, the importance of data and tracking improvements and moving the needle on energy efficiency in the commercial sector. two really good meetings, i think -- especially good. >> going to move onto the operations, and then, we'll have questions and then public comment. commissioner stephenson. >> yep. we had an operations committee meeting last week, on january 16, and the bulk of our discussion centered around the budget that we just approved.

we also heard a great presentation by becca raven about an outreach campaign. it was absolutely fantastic. you probably saw it. it was a campaign about the supergreen program, 100% renewable energy through the cleanpowersf program. you may have seen the ads on buses or bus shelters or across social media. what pi personally, as a media and marketing person loved about this how they took data and insight from a couple of years ago that they realized through surveys and feedback that renters didn't realize that they had access to this campaign or this 100% renewable energy, and just some misconceptions that it was a lot more expensive, when it was only about $5 a month. so they took steps to address things that kept people from signing up.

the thing that i loved was they carefully tracked the data. the result was a 36% increase in enrollment in the campaign. so it's so nice to see the data being used, and then, the out comes being so positive, so -- >> questions for the -- >> you answered the question i was going to ask, which was, did it move the needle, and i'm so glad it did. >> yeah. >> did we fund that or did the p.u.c. fund that? >> we did. >> actually, we funded it with -- i don't know if you recall, but we won an award from pg&e 1.5 years ago for our step up and power down, but we were competing against san jose. so we won an award, and they gave us prize money, and so we used part of that money to support that campaign. no, p.u.c. did not pay for it.

we're good team members. >> yes, indeed. >> any other comments or questions? if not, we'll onto public comment on this item. okay. hearing none, next item, anthony. >> the next item is item 13, announcements. this item is for discussion. >> no announcements? any public comment on this item? okay. hearing none, next item, please. >> the next item is item 14, new business and future agenda items. the speaker is charles sheehan, chief policy and public information officer. this item is discussion and possible action. >> thank you, officers. the next policy meeting is february 11. the next commission meeting is march 26, and then, we have an operations committee meeting in may. we're still working out that day. but for our next commission

meeting, we're looking at bringing to you a presentation on the energy efficiency coordinating committee. they've wrapped up their report and we're looking at bringing that presentation to you. going further into the future, it looks like energy presentation, the energy efficiency topic will be reoccurring probably a couple other times throughout the year. >> commissioner stephenson? >> yeah. i just had a couple of things i thought that maybe we could potentially agendaize for future meetings, whether that's at the operations committee or at the full commission. one is it's been a long time since we talked about green purchasing? i think it would be really interesting to see how that needle has moved across the city and across the city departments? i think that might be ops -- like, appropriate for operations? and the other think just thinking about the five values

and the equity lens? i know we had a presentation years ago on product diversity, and i thought that would maybe not an interesting thing for us to cover, as well. >> thank you, commissioner. we are -- have taken note of that. i believe for the green purchasing item, i believe we might be bringing that forward in the may operations meeting, so stay tuned on that. >> okay. commissioner wald. >> and i was wondering whether or not it would be appropriate at some point in time for us to hear a presentation on pg&e bankruptcy and options and what the department is doing with the p.u.c. to examine those options and make recommendations, if any, to the city as to how we should respond. >> thank you, commissioner.

>> it's a little tricky, i understand. >> yeah. we'll have to take that back and obviously talk to our p.u.c. colleagues. >> but i would be interested in hearing about it. i've already been told a member of the public, it's been explained to me the difference between -- which i've obviously forgotten -- clean power and community choice -- no, public power and community -- >> yes. >> yes. >> any other comments? if not, any public comment on this item? okay, hearing none, next item. >> the next item is item 15, adjournment. the time is 7:05 p.m. >> thank you. thank you, anthony.

>> thank you for broadcasting this meeting. do you have any announcements club his police items all cell phones and electronic devices. completed speaking cards are to be included as part of the file as part of the agenda.

item number 4 and 6 on the agenda today were inadvertently included, therefore these items will be continued to the call of the chair. >> please call item one. >> one his resolution retroactively approving a service agreement between pg and e. and the board services to clean power s.f. for a term of ten years on jennifer's, 2019 character december 1st --dash just up the first, 2028. >> thank you very much picked this was an item that was continued. i believe he is here to present on this item. >> good morning, supervisors. i am the director of clean power s.f. item number 1 before you is a resolution approving service agreements between clean power s.f. and pacific gas & electric. this agreement is to allow the

operation of the c.c.a. program pick we briefed the committee last week on this item. we had your concerns about the term of the agreement, and issues related to p.g. & e's circumstances today with potential impending bankruptcy. after further discussion with the city attorney's office, we feel comfortable with the city's writes on the agreement, it does provide provisions that allow for termination if the city were to end the c.c.a. program. for example,, to become a municipal utility. with that, i'm happy to answer any other questions you may have >> thank you. do we have any questions, none back thank you very much. so we heard the report from the b.l.a. last time, is there a request to hear at this time from colleagues? no, thank you very much. let's open this up to public comment. would any members of the public would like to comment on item

number 1? public comment is now closed. i would like to make a motion to send this to the full board with a positive recommendation as a committee report. can retake that without objection? thank you very much. madam clerk, i would like to call item number 3. >> item number 3 is resolution retroactively approving a contract agreement with southern california edison company for supplies of renewable energy for clean power s.f. for a contract term of one year from january 1 st, 2019 through december 1 st, 2019 in an amount not to exceed $24 million. >> thank you very much. >> hello, again, supervisors. i have some prepared remarks on this item, then i'm happy to answer any questions you might have. so you have before you a resolution that would retroactively approve a renewable energy contract for the clean power s.f. program for calendar year 2019. clean power s.f. is a san francisco community choice

aggregation program authorized under assembly bill 117, and adopted by the board and the mayor appear clean power s.f. has been serving customers since may of 2016. by allowing the city to determine the source of its energy supply and direct more of its electric customers dollars towards renewable and clean sources of energy, clean power s.f. is a key strategy to meeting the city's goal to eliminate greenhouse gases from its electric supply by 2030. this contract will provide critical additional renewable energy supplies to serve clean power s.f. customers, including our new customers to be enrolled in april of this year. the contract has a one year term for 300,000-megawatt hours of renewable energy to be delivered by december 31st of 2019. with this contract, s.f. p.u.c. staff projects that clean power s.f. will be able to meet their green product target of 45%

renewable energy content this year. by comparison, in 2018, a p.g. & e's energy portfolio featured future 33% renewable energy. the s.f. p.u.c. authorizes execution of the agreement on december 11th of last year. due to the board of supervisors recess in december, the resolution to approve the proposed contract was not introduced to the board until january 15th. southern california edison indicated that if we do not execute the contract in january, it would be unable to hold the energy volumes. to ensure the s.f. p.u.c. would be able to secure the renewable energy needed to meet the program's targets for 2018 -- for 2019, the general manager of the s.f. p.u.c. executed the agreement on january 17th. the negotiated contract meets all applicable conditions established by the board for renewable energy contracts for clean power s.f. the total cost is not to exceed $24 million.

all costs associated with the contract will be paid from clean power s.f. revenues, and the total costs are within the approved clean power s.f. budget that concludes my remarks, i'm happy to take any questions you might have. >> thank you very much. any questions? seeing none, let's hear from the b.l.a., please. >> good morning, chair viewer and members of the committee. i'm from the budget analyst office. the budget -- if you look at the full budget for clean power s.f. , it was $157 million, most of that was a hundred 60,000,004 power purchases, and 212.9 million in 19-20, but this agreement is for the calendar year 19, it is for up to $24 million. we did look at the contract itself, and the pricing and terms of the price of megawatt

hours in the expect -- and the expected number of customers. we consider the contract to be reasonable, at on that basis, we recommended approval, but i want to add that in december of 2017, they held -- they asked us to submit annual reports. to date to, that report has not yet been submitted. our understanding is the plan is to submit it after they have the final financial audit 417-18, but we are requesting an amendment to this resolution to reaffirm the board's request for the annual report, otherwise we do recommend approval. >> thank you very much. let's open this up for public comment period are there any members of the public who wish to comment? public comment is now closed. i would like to make a motion to accept the amendment, and send this on to the full board with a positive recommendation as

amended. can we take that without objection? thank you very much. can you please call item number 2. >> approving an emergency declaration of the public utility commission to repair -- for a total estimated cost not to exceed $3 million. >> thank you. i believe we have brian mag no, the project manager from s.f. p.u.c. to present on this item. >> good morning, supervisors. i am with the s.f. p.u.c. i am here to talk about the declaration of emergency of the collapse collapsed ventilation ductwork at oceanside ocean control plant. at oceanside, water pollution control treats up to 21 million gallons a day.

are primary building's function treats primary liquids, and begins our solids management process. this building is an essential wastewater treatment process at oceanside, and is essential for regulatory compliance. the primary clarifier process is essential for safety of the public and the environment. the building is approximately 40,000 square feet. a declaration of emergency was made on november 3rd to wear wastewater enterprise staff discovered a collapsed section of the ventilation ducting, and our o.s.b. building primary clarifier building. the collapsed ventilation ductwork post safety risks with no reliable fresh supply air, and similar ductwork remain supported with the root -- hangers. on november 8th, the s.f.

p.u.c. declared an emergency under chapter six, section 6.6 of the ministries of code. this photo represents the collapsed ductwork that was supported by the roof in that building. in response to the emergency on november 16th, s.f. p.u.c. does -- establish an emergency contract to issue a work authorization letter. the contract value was $2.7 million with a contingency of $300,000 for a total emergency of $3 million. the duration to perform the essential repairs is approximately six months. the current status at oceanside is interim of georgie ventilation system is in place, and hazardous gas monitoring procedures within the building

are in effect for effective staff. the contractor has mobilized on site and removed collapsed sections of the ductwork, and began temporary scaffolding in the area. the contractor initiated fabrication of new ductwork. a request of the committee today is to support approval of the emergency declaration of the s.f. p.u.c. commission pursuant to the ministries of code section 6.6. >> thank you very much. colleagues, any questions? yes, supervisor walton? >> a question just in terms of how much -- and how much -- what is the protocol if this were to happen in the future? >> our operations and maintenance staff perform routine condition assessments of

the facility, we have annual budgets to perform interim repairs in-house, and then we have annual repair budgets to address any deficiencies identified in those investigations, and we are embarking on a larger sewer system improvement program to address larger deficiencies identified in the process. >> and no one saw this? >> no one saw the immediate collapse of the ductwork. >> supervisor stefani? >> thank you for your presentation. with the collapse, was there any indications that it was going to go past its useful life, were previously identified as something that would need to be in repair at any time in the future? >> as part of our sewer system

improvement program, we have a project identified to address conditions and service life issues. the mechanical equipment in the area is reaching the end of its life, and is subject to repair and replacement. >> how long has it been there? >> over 20 years. >> have inspections identified other equipment in the area that may need replacement in the near future? >> yes, there are skimmers and other mechanical equipment that are essential for process operations that need to be repaired and replaced as well. >> is that already planned for in the budget? >> yes, there are repair plans for those. >> thank you. >> thank you very much. let's hear from the b.l.a., please. >> the resolution sets a limit for this emergency repair, we

did look to budget and it is on page 8, it is considered to be reasonable reasonable. reaffirms what has been said and the questions. emergency declaration allows a department to enter into contracts for special work and go through a competitive process i think that there is a concern that work would be anticipated in advance so it can be performed through a competitive process. in this case, they had originally been sectioned for other work at the treatment plant through a competitive bid, s.f. p.u.c. did solicit quotes for more than one vendor for this specific work and founds their work was the most reasonable and lowest price. we do recommend approval. >> thank you very much. let's open us up for public comment period are there any members of the public who wish to comment on this item? seen on, public comment is closed. any other questions? none, let's make a motion to

send this to the full board with full recommendation. we can take that without objection. thank you very much. madam clerk, can you please call item number 4. >> item for its resolution to approve --dash a contract to determine modernization -- four and a half years from april 5th until october 4th, 2023, entry a contract amount by $36 million. contract amount not to exceed $50 million. >> as a clerk stated earlier, we will continue this item to the call of the chair to ensure we have a b.l.a. report when it is hard, but let's open it up to members of the public who wish to speak on this item. are there any members of the public would like to speak? seen none, public comment is closed. colleagues, is there a motion to continue this to the call of the chair? i think we can take that without objection. thank you very much.

madam clerk, please call item number 5. >> resolution retroactively approving modification number 1 for a lease between the united states government and the city force space occupied by the f.b.i. at the international terminal of san francisco international airport, to extend the term up to three years to a 20 what year term to commence generally fourth, 2019, and increase in annual rent to approximately $615,000. >> thank you very much. >> good morning, members of the committee. i am with the san francisco international airport. the item before you seeks your approval for modifications with the lease of the f.b.i. -- for 2,000 square feet of office space within the international terminal. the annual rent is 615,000

dollars. modification number 1 will extend the term of the lease an additional three years. the f.b.i. does have the option to terminate the lease after the second year, with 60 days notice this would be to accommodate a move into the new proposed courtyard office building. that would be pending the completion. terminal rent is based on comparatives and category to watch what rates in the airport to catch out rates and charges. the total rental revenue over the three year term of the lease equals $1.8 million. this modification does require retroactivity to january 4th due to the delay in obtaining required general services on the f.b.i. lease. the budget's analyst office recommends approval and i would be happy to answer any questions >> any questions? yes, supervisor walton?

>> thank you. since this is retro to january, how does that work for us in the city class. >> that is a very good question. the lease right now is on month-to-month, so we have received january's at rent. i will have to find out what happens with rent payments. that is not one of the issues that we have had brought to our attention that we wouldn't be receiving rent from the airport, but the partial shutdown does definitely apply to the f.b.i., but i will find out and get back to you. i don't know for certain. i know that -- i know their current state, but i don't know what happens in february. i will find out for you. >> thank you. any other questions? i have a couple of questions. piggybacking a supervisor walton 's question, if they are late in paying their rent, is a penalty? >> i believe it would just be a standards. most leases that we have, and i believe this also applies to our leases with the federal government, they carry some sort of a security deposit.

i think that until they are current, the rent would be taken out of their security deposits. i don't think we would be in a situation where they would be delinquent on their rent. all of our leases make accommodations for some sort of potential lapse in rent, and that would apply to our agreements with the federal agencies as well. >> okay, thank you. i'm just concerned because on the news this morning they were mentioning that this could go on for a couple of months. i also want to know, what is the role of the f.b.i. at the international terminal? >> the f.b.i. has a presence at the airport to investigate any sort of criminal activity, people coming and going, they work hand-in-hand with customs to flag people who maybe on the no-fly list, things like that. they have an extremely large presence. i believe there are only eight federal officers that work out of the f.b.i. office at the airport. >> do you know --

>> do you know how many? >> i would be happy to find out. >> i appreciate it. you say they work with customs. is that correct class. >> i believe so. their role at the airport is to make sure that people entering into the country are not someone that the f.b.i. is investigating >> do know the number of personnel that are at the international terminal class. >> with the f.b.i., i believe it is eight. my recollection is there are eight officers at the airport. let's hear from the budget legislative analyst now. >> this is a successor contract an existing contract that was brought to the board in 2011. it is a three year extended contract to 2022, however, the f.b.i. can terminate it after two years, i believe there is a discussion about them moving

into alternative space at the airport. of the rent in the contract is based on the airport's fixed rates and charges approved by the airport commission each year pick what they have done, instead of having three years offsetting each year, they project what the escalation in the rent would be over the next two years, and average it out over the term of the agreement. this is consistent with some other comparable leases the airport has. the total rent and operating cost to the airport over the three years is $1.8 million, and we do recommends approval. >> thank you very much. any other questions or comments? i would just like to ask her to respond in writing to the questions that i have proposed today, and to get deeper knowledge about the role that the f.b.i. plays throughout this i would like to make a motion to -- public comment, you are absolutely right. let's open it up for public comment. are there any members of the

public would like to speak? seeing none, public comment is closed. i make a motion to move this to the full board with a positive recommendation. we can take that without objection. madam clerk, please call item number 6. >> the terms of of the 2011 lease agreement --dash landing fees for the lease term to come to the following board approval and expiring on june 30th, 2021. >> thank you very much. as a clerk stated earlier, we will continue this item to the call of the chair to ensure we have a b.l.a. report. are there any members of the public who wish to speak on this item? public comment is closed. and i have a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair? >> so moved. >> thank you very much. we can take that without objection. thank you. madam clerk, please call item seven, eight, and nine together.

>> seven is a resolution approving the terminal one retail concession lease for a store, and a term for seven years with two one-year options to extend and a minimum -- item number 8 is a resolution approving terminal one retail concession lease seven and the city for a term of seven years with 20 what one-year options to extend, and a minimum annual guarantee of 220,000 for the first year of the lease to commence following board approval. item number 9 is a resolution approving the terminal one retail concession lease number 6 for a term of two years with two one-year options to extend. >> thank you very much. i believe, -- i believe someone is here from the san francisco international airport. thank you.

the item before you seeks your approval -- of the three items before you seek approval for three new concession leases and a terminal one harvey milk terminal with retail stores. all three leases were the result of a request for proposals process for retail concessions in terminal one for a newsstand, bath and beauty store, and a specialty sunglass retail shop. each lease will pay either the greater of a minimum annual guarantee, or the percentage rent. these leases have terms of seven years, with two one-year options to extend. the rents associated with each of the three leases are $135,000 , $220,000, $126,000. the rent for all of these three concessions will be paid at a 50 % rate over the staggered

opening of the terminal, however , based on previous sales of these concepts in these locations, airport staff does believe that all three of the leases will be paid on the higher percentage. the budget analyst office has reviewed and recommends approval , i would be happy to answer questions. >> thank you very much. any questions? let's hear from the b.l.a., please. >> these leases are part of a solicitation for retail concessions in terminal one. the three leases before you today, the score that they received in terms of the r.f.p. process are on page 21 and 22 of the report. page 23 we summarize the term of these leases. each of the lease this is for seven years. they will be phased in because of -- over the first 21 years, terminal one renovations will still be in process, so they

don't actually start paying the full minimum guaranteed rent until the second part of the lease. we do summarize that those amounts on page 24 of the report , as stated, will be paying a percentage of rent received, or the minimum annual guarantee. i believe the airport's assumption is they will be paying percentage rent. the rents we estimate will perhaps be higher than what are in the reports, and we do recommends approval. >> thank you very much. any other questions, i have one question for you. where there any local businesses that bid on these retail concession leases? as the office reported, these are three of seven concepts. i can find out for you were each of the three proposed are located. i don't know offhand, but i do

know that there are elements of the r.f.p. that emphasizes local concepts and businesses. they don't get extra points necessarily for being located locally, but if their concept is local, and they have done business in san francisco, that is highlighted in the r.f.p. >> thank you. >> i will find out for you for all seven. >> i appreciate it's, thank you. let's open it up for public comment. are there any members of the public would like to comment? public comment is now closed. i would like to make a motion to move this to the board with a positive recommendation. can we take that -- okay, great. good. madam clerk, can you please call item number 10. >> item ten resolution supporting the city's participation in the united states census census, authorizing the city administrator to designate the office of civic engagement to

consult -- consult -- conduct. >> thank you very much. i am happy to sponsor this resolution. i would like to introduce bill barnes, from the administrator's office. >> good morning, members of the committee. i will be brief, except to say the census happens every ten years. in previous years, the government was a huge partner in helping us do this work to reach out to communities people -- reach out to communities, younger immigrants, that is not the case. the state of california stepped into say there will be resources for cities and counties where both the city resources and county resources. earlier this year, the board accepted a spend for $100,000 for the city of san francisco, and now we are here to talk about the county of san francisco. we are busy -- position to

receive $550,000 as our county to support nonprofits and community groups to reach parched to count communities. adrienne from the office of civic engagement has been a leader on these issues for many years, it is here to talk about what the work will actually entail. >> thank you. >> good morning, supervisors. i am the executive director of the office of civic engagement and immigrant affairs, and i do want to introduce two members of my staff, my colleagues robert clinton, avenue civic engagement project manager, and our senior immigrant affairs advisor calculating a sure, will be helping us with the census efforts. item ten of your consideration as a resolution that would allow the city administrator to opt in to &-ampersand agreements to participate in a california outreach program for 2020. the california complete count committee has