to july 1, 1994, the test was optional. everybody after that mandatory test for everybody from the rank of officer to captain. >> okay. thank you. minor clarification. thank you. >> we are looking for a motion to approve. >> so moved. >> on the question we need public comment. any public comment on the physical fitness evaluation program. >> all right then i will call for a vote. all in favor of approving this general order as modified. any opposed? it is passed. next eye stem. >> we have a tem8 general public comment. the public is welcome to address the commission regarding items

that do not appear on tonight's agenda. speaker shall address to the commission as a hole. under the rules of order neither police or dpa personnel or commissioners are required to respond to questions but may provide a brief respond. individual commissioners should refrain from entering any debates or discussion with speakers during public comment. please limit comments to three minutes. >> i am the david good man, son of ben good man a stea a steal r and organizer in the 1930. son of the opera star in the 190s in chicago. neath nephew of sa sam good mane

chicago kid. i live in the boardman care home for taking care of older adults. it is called golden residential care home owned by antoine who calls herself nina. these are filipino people. my father when he was in the last days was cared for -- forgetting about that. instead of treating the residents who are all kind gentle souls with kindness and love, the care taker, libda, use -- linda uses fear and intimidation. egregious is chasing residents around with butcher knives and knives. one resident. jeffrey she went in a stabbing motion and was able to get within two or three inches of

his stomach. he thought he was being stabbed. i guess she is good enough in her control of weapons to make it appear she is stabbing someone. he developed a an aneurysm. it is in the same spot as the thrust. another resident was struck with a butcher knife on the leg. jeffrey witnessed that, and i called the police and reported it as an assault with a deadly weapon. two officers came from the station and did a very good job. i commend them. they were able to interview. these are hard to -- a lot of people cannot come out very well to express themselves. jeffrey can. they were age option able to

elicit the witness testimony to jeffrey saw linda strike the man. i am hoping the commission will see right now the question is is that an assault with a deadly weapon or brandishing? it goes beyond brandishing. it is assault with a deadly weapon when you talk about a butcher knife. i encourage the commissioners. it is in special investigations i called in to check. i think it is in special investigations. i would like to see that woman arrested and charged. >> thank you, sir. >> former commissioner salinas. >> i am a native san francisco i have passed the half century mark here.

commissioners, you grew up in a gang infested neighborhood. i hung around the gardens and i kid you not. i knew about every gang member in the city. our culture was never ours to establish lines of communication or dialogue, at least respectful lines of communication and dialogue. you slapped somebody up the side of the head the hardest. he had slapped the hardest gained attention and respect. that is how you conducted accident on the streets. we are not on the streets any more. commissioners, you have been given the privilege and honor of serving on one of the most prestigious panels in the city and county of san francisco. you have the ability to affect thousands of brothers and sisters in the black and brown community in the best possible

way. i was a deeply disturbed and disappointed what i read in the periodical last week. there are intelligent, mature professionals on this panel. you have been given the privilege and honor of doing what most people would say i want to give something back to the city. as volunteer citizens. i was deeply disappointed you couldn't set aside the politics and political ragging, the power play to, you know, establish who is going to do what and maintain what title here. you have the title of san francisco police commissioner. that should suffice. it undermines the credibility of this panel, undermines the trust and confidence in all of you when you guys can't conduct business. when you can't get along.

how are we to put our faith and trust in you if you can't get along yourself? i was deeply saddened. i think that, you know, you could do much better. i am heartened by what commissioner said and you are all establishing those lines of communication again and building those relationships. they affect all of us. there is something to be said for decorum. that is a homeboy telling you that. nice seeing all of you. thank you very much. >> any further public comment? >> good evening, i am a resident of district five. it is nice to see you. i don't know your title or

assistant chief. i am here tonight because i shot chief scott would be here. i i want to thank chief scott for two years of service. he is an effective leader. long overdue for testifying for specific incidents. my work site is near valencia. there was a loud man. i made it a point to observe the police interaction. they did not abuse authority. it ended well. a few weeks later i watched the police officers handle a homeless man who was not all the way there. one of the officers recognized me and i did praise them and thank them. i want to give the positive feedback. it is not always positive. a few weeks later at 15th and mission there was a black man on the ground loudly complaining. i stood witness. at first the officers were not

happy i was there. i stood my ground. when i saw they were not hurting him i was relieved. they explained he was running in and out of traffic and they were worried about his safety. >> another officer that was white seemed well trained on working with those in color. i do want to say the homeless sweeps disturb me. i am objecting to homeless people having tents taken from them in the rain. finally i want to say i am pleased with captaineningler at the northern station. i got grabbed into my neighbor's e-mail threats. there is a wrong man. -- young man.

i forwarded the threads. the captain is responsive and gracious. i felt like my neighbors were acting as our problems were his only concern. when i told him i was disappointed. he said that is what he was there for. he is doing a great job at northern station. they were pressing him to question all black men in hoodies in the fillmore. he replied his officers are trained to not raytially profile -- rashtially profile the black men. it is not only wrong but it needs to stop. i want to relay my comments tonight. thank you. >> good evening.

i wanted to show a picture of you guys at the event. the spd. it is not on. >> please start the clock. let me see if i can find it. i am going to keep going. that is derek brown that did everything. i want to get to the picture.

those are the kids. wait a minute. okay. you guys are there. i was proud to see you guys up there. what i am trying to say also i was disappointed last week about how everybody walked out in the whole thing. it embarrassed me not only that i was speaking about you know the division that is happening up here, and what do we have coming as the people? what do i have coming as a person that comes here every wednesday? this is the first time in 13 or 12 years i have seen this happening. people walk off the panel so what do we have coming as the public as we see stuff like this? just like he says, where is the

trust at? we are like the community out there. law enforcement against the community. there is no trust. i am worried about that. i am going to go back to why i am here all of the time. my son was murdered august 14, 2006 to this date still no justice. i have been asking for a venue for my son. po, the police association did it before. i am asking for a venue so i don't have to climb up on a poll to put something up for the perpetrators to say where were you when i was murdered? i brought this picture of this young man last time. this is the young man that murdered my son and bragged about it.

thomas han hannibal. these are on the fifth floor in the investigating room. that is how the names came about. i wanted you to see a picture what he looks like now. that is just one of them. i bring you this picture because we don't want to make an uproar. we talk about police killings and back on black crime. we do more about police killings than black-on-black crime. what do we do about that? i want the same justice, same uproar about police killings about community violence. i am asking for your help. i have been asking for your help for the last 12 years. help me. >> thank you. the tip line is (415)575-4444. we say that every week. we have said it for years. we hope for somebody to one day come forward.

thank you. no further public comment. public comment is closed. next item. >> item 9 public comment on all matters to item 11 below including on item 10 vote whether to hold item 11 in closed session. >> any public comment on closed session. >> item 10 vote on whether to hold item 11 in closed session including vote on whether or not to assert the attorney client privilege with regard to item 11:00 a.m. san francisco administrative code 67.10. >> so moved.

>> commissioner back on the record in open session and you still have a quorum. >> is there anything left other than adjournment. >> vote to elect when to discloe closed session. >> i have a motion. >> move. >> is there a second. >> all in favor. >> aye. >> the motion carried. >> can i have a motion to adjourn. >> yes. >> so moved. >> all in favor. aye.

- working for the city and county of san francisco will immerse you in a vibrant and dynamic city that's on the forefront of economic growth, the arts, and social change. our city has always been on the edge of progress and innovation. after all, we're at the meeting of land and sea. - our city is famous for its iconic scenery, historic designs, and world- class style. it's the birthplace of blue jeans, and where "the rock" holds court over the largest natural harbor on the west coast. - the city's information technology professionals work on revolutionary projects, like providing free wifi to residents and visitors, developing new programs to keep sfo humming,

and ensuring patient safety at san francisco general. our it professionals make government accessible through award-winning mobile apps, and support vital infrastructure projects like the hetch hetchy regional water system. - our employees enjoy competitive salaries, as well as generous benefits programs. but most importantly, working for the city and county of san francisco gives employees an opportunity to contribute their ideas, energy, and commitment to shape the city's future. - thank you for considering a career with the city and county of san francisco.

the meeting will come to order. this is the january 18th regular meeting of the lafco commission. i am sandraly fewer. i am joined by cynthia pollock. the clerk is here. i would like to thank the staff at sf goff tv for today's meeting. do we have any announcements? >> please silence all cell

phones. copies of documents should be submitted to the clerk. >> thank you. can you please call item two. >> approval of the lafco minutes from the november 30th 2018 special meeting. >> do you have any changes to the minutes of the november 30th meeting? let's open up for public comment. any comments? public comment is now closed. is there a motion to approve the minutes? >> yes. moved by commissioner pollock without objection the minutes are approved. can you please call item 3. >> community choice aggravation activities report and local buildout presentation. >> i believe we have a presentation from the director of the san francisco public utilities commission about local

build-up. >> good morning, commissioners. happy friday. michael hyams. i have a presentation loaded up. if you could bring the slides up. thank you. >> i hate to interrupt as you are just beginning. we have had the enrollment presentation at the last few meetings. could we skip ahead? >> sure. if that is the wish of the commission. >> seeing no objection i would like to welcome the commissioner shanti singh to join us right now. >> before we skip ahead here, i wanted to mention a couple

things pending before the board. we have a service agreement that is before the budget and finance committee. that service agreement is required for the operation of the clean powers program. we are seeking retroactive approval of execution of the agreement executed at the end of last year for continue nowty of operations. another pending agreement that will come before the board shortly is a short term renewable energy contract for the program to support our renewable energy content goals for 2019. happy to provide any more information on those two items if you are interested.

as i think commissioner pollock indicated at the last meeting there are a number of questions the commission raised. >> reporter: to local investment for the program. we prepared material here for that discussion including information about progress to date, but also what we are planning on doing to further our progress on local investment in the near and medium term. i went a little too far. i want to ground the conversation with the goals. we are guided by the following

goals within put from the mayor, board of supervisors, lafco and our sfpc commission. those are that we lead with affordability and deliver competitive rates and reliable service to our customers, we provide cleaner electricity alternatives and to contribute to the de carbon of the city energy supply by 2030 and invest the revenues locally in renewable and demand side projects, that made include measures to reduce energy use of homes and businesses and create new clean energy jobs within san francisco and the bay area. finally, to balance these goals while also providing long-term rate and financial stability. given we are talking about local

investment, i thought it appropriate to frame what we mean by local, how we are approaching local. the sfpc defined local and power supply solicitations as projects located within our region. the nine bay san francisco area bay counties. part of the reason we framed it this way is access to diverse pool of resources, it gives access to projects that might retire moreland that is available in the city and county of san francisco which translate goes to more cost-effective resources for ratepayers. for purposes of local investment as it pertains to demand side resources that i just described a moment ago, our local areas in the city and county of san

francisco where the customers are. i will add to that that this item is binary reasonable supply can and will continue to do that and i will get into how we will approach that in a moment. since we launched we have made progress in terms of sources renewable energy supply from within the nine bay area counties. starting here at home we are purchasing the output from the e sun set reservoir solar project under contract with the publicly owned project. we use that to serve the super-green customer demand. across the bay we are purchasing wind energy from the shiloh wind

farm and wind power from the golden hills wind project. finally, starting in may of last year we started receiving deliveries under a five-year contract with the geysers, geothermal project in sonoma county. i do want to add that that contract which is with cal pine is the first contract that we have entered into that also features community benefits are visions in a renewable energy contract. we have also executed long-term contracts to support the development of new renewable energy resources in california. we have entered into two long-term contracts, including a project in lancaster california scheduled to begin generating power and delivering power in

july. a 47-megawatt wind farm repower, that is redevelopment of an existing asset that has out lived its useful life in mohave, california. that is to deliver at the end of 2020. together these projects will produce enough renewable energy to supply 130,000 average san francisco households, create 600 clean energy jobs in california combined with construction and operation of those facilities. at the last lafco meeting there was discussion about greenhouse gas and city footprint and contributions to reducing the city carbon footprint.

this chart is to give you a sense how the clean power sf program performed from a clean carbon standpoint since it starting serving customers in 2016. this discusses the average rate per megawatt hour of energy for p.g.e. and clean power sf. the orange bars are p.g.e. admissions rate. the value through 2016 are actual rates as reported by p.g.e. the values in 2017 and 2018 are staff estimates what the rates will be from those years drawing from public documents such as the power content label. the power content label is like the food label for the energy industry describing the sources of supply. >> commissioner, do you have a question?

>> yes, through the chair. going back to this chart. from 2012 to 2015, that was just pg&e's contribution of bg and e's carbon footprint in san francisco? >> yes think of every unit of energy that those in san francisco consume those are the average emissions associated with that energy. >> why do we not have a line for clean power in 2017? >> our portfolio did not emit any commissions it was zero, 100% reduction. you can see that the first green bar here which represents the

rates shows in 2016 which is the first year they started serving customers in may. period of 2016 that they served customers in san francisco, it delivered a mix of resources that emitted 37% less carbon than pg&e's equivalent products. one thing to look at. there is a lag in terms when we get this. they file the data two years after the actual calendar year. you can see in the same year pg&e experienced dramatic reduction itself. >> that is from your work. >> thank you. that is one of the points i wanted to make. we have an interesting dynamic when it comes to addressing climate change in competition. the formation of cca's alone are

delivering a benefit to the investor and utilities. the renewable energy they have procured will represent an increasing amount of the energy portfolio. >> in 2017 you achieved 100% every deduction because of super-green products? >> let me explain what happened in 2017. these images here, the chart looks at our total sales and our total mix of resources. it is not segmented between super-green and green. it is the whole picture, come heat ar-- complete rate. >> green are default. renewable energy and hydroelectric supply, that is greenhouse gas free.

in we were serving a segment of the city. it was a good winter from the hydro logical standpoint. there was a lot of available power to be supplied to the program. >> interesting. last question. a chart that i would love to see and i don't know if you can make this or we will talk to the department of environment about it. i would love to see in terms of the dhg reduction over time for the entire footprint in san francisco. i would like to see the impact on that reduction versus every other effort we have made. i don't know if that makes sense. i don't know if that is something we have. i would love to see that. >> barbara hale. i can tell you department of

environment says clean power sf the program and growth of responsibilities for providing electricity is the most we can do to reduce the overall carbon footprint. it is the agency for the overall footprint, not just energy but everything. we can certainly reach out and see if they have an up-to-date slide for that. >> i would love that. i will do that as well. thanks. >> i will add that we work with them and share data with them every year. i think the last complete year they have prepared these figures for us 2016, which did include clean power sf. we were a small program at that point in time. what when become more important is this year and next year as we

become full-scale and city wide. that is when you will see a bigger impact. let it was see if i can get the slides back. so just to re-enforce the 2018, last one is projection for the last calendar year, and one thing i want to point out is that the development of the energy supply portfolio is complex. i think as we probably talked about in other meetings, it is competitive. there are other communities performing the cca programs. in 2018 we significantly grew demand and need to buy energy. what that means as we grow and develop that portfolio we are

significantly increasing our supply, and it takes it a year or so t so to stabilize those commitments. 2018 was more of a drought year. there was less hydro available to the system. that is something the hydro resource is really important to the state, and it is something reflecting on the hydro logical cycle, there are years with a lot of hydropower available and years with not that much. we can expect to see ups and downs in the future from those resources. we have also supported behind the meter distributed energy resource projects. to date we enrolled 6600 net energy metering customers with

rooftop solar and that is 75% of the rooftop solar in san francisco. we have a great retention rate. part of the reason is that we offer a great net metering tariff which we developed when we launched the program. we offer surplus energy three times what pg&e offers for local clean power generated into the system. we will be completing the enrollnent to the net metering program in april. finally, we are going to continue to provide incentives through the go solar sf program and other modifications to that program or other programs we develop over time to support further local distributed energy resource investment for our customers. for example, to replace

inverters, support storage. we will get more into that later. shifting to looking ahead and thinking about planning and tools for planning, i wanted to use this opportunity to highlight our regular planning processes and tools to help us lay out a strategy for local investment going forward. these include the integrated resource planning process, irp as it is referred to. the biannual 10 year planning process that sf conducts. periodic energy resource assessments. power enterprises conducted a number of studies on the potential and cost of developing the renewable energy projects in

the city. we will continue to update that work as needed as it requires fine tuning and cost updates, and we also receive really valuable information for planning purposes with respect to where we newable energy development community is targeting projects, where the costs of energy from those projects is heading and timelines for developing the projects through renewable energy solicitation processes. we can issue requests for information to market participants to get a sense of where and when projects may be getting developed in terms of private side development. i want to spend a bit more time on the integrated resource plan in particular. we completed the first irp in

2018, and it is really going to be the critical tool for resource and investment planning going forward. what is an irp? an irp is a resource plan that evaluates scenarios to provide customers at the lowest cost for which utility can delivery liable energy and meet policy objectives. irp is required under state law. also an sfp policy to prepare it every two years. they are useful for service reliability planning, evaluating cost effectiveness of supply, also comparing policy options and supply scenarios over the long-term. achieving the de carbonization objectives. they are not to replace

budgeting or capital planning or rate setting or operational or maintenance plans. last year when we embarked on the development of the first irp, we focused on the following goals. model and analyze the program demand. as a new business and growing program, this is a foundational part of the irp process. identify options for meeting clean power sf renewable and greenhouse gas reduction targets and invest local. it specifically examined what it would take to achieve the city goal of eliminating carbon from the electricity supply by 2030 as it pertains to the service they are responsible for. optimize around the portfolio to deliver competitively priced

products. since we aim to balance the program goals, this is an important element looking at the cost of different portfolios and identifying the mixer that supports the environmental and also afford ability and competitive objectives as well. this slide summarizes the cases that we analyzed in the 2018 integrated resource plan. i believe the version of the deck that was posted including a typo to five cases. we have updated that to seven cases that were analyzed. these cases were formed based on current understanding and projection of technology. what we were looking at resources that we knew would be competitive, competitively priced and support our cost

objectives, also accounted for other goals like local investment. you can see the cases summarized at the bottom of the slide. i won't go through all of them. i will note in the late spring or early summer when we talked about this last. there were five cases. we since have added two cases that examined battery storage components. the idea here is renewable resources are variable, they produce when the shine is shining and wind is blowing. they are subject to market prices in terms of value of energy produced. one thing we noticed in the irp the projections of market prices were influencing the cases and storage has come up here before, battery storage, for example, is one new emerging technology to be used to store the power of the sun and move it to the

periods of time that are of higher value when the city has demand. i did want to mention here on the local side that we examined new solar and wind resources from within the city. on sfpc property in the bay area and further development of wind resources in the region. this slide summarizes the annual program sales and portfolio targets used in the plan projected out to 2030. each bar represents annual electricity sales for clean power sf. the segments within the bar represent the types of resources used to meet that demand. we were using these as our planning targets for each year. you can see the slight green

segment represents renewable energy supporting the green product portfolio. dark green segment represents additional renewable energy used to serve super-green customer demand. going from 50 to 100%. blue represents carbon free hydroelectric resources. grey segment represents conventional or system power purchases. you can see over the planning period the grey disappears eventually by 2030. you can also see from the slide the significant growth in the program demand over 2016 to 2019 period. we are in the middle of the process. the dotted line representing today we completed service 2016, 2017, 2018. this year we are making a significant jump in sales and

associated contracting requirements. drilling deeper to one of the cases we analyzed. this is case five. that featured local resources and pow curement focused on wind energy resources that is the case we analyzed that had the most favorable economic results. you can see in the areagraph here on the left of the slide the growth of new resources over time to meet the clean power sf portfolio needs over the planning period and the resources to meet that. they are identified below the chart. you can see the power at the university reservoy. those are sfpc sites. on the right side of the chart,

the map, you can see the location of the resources we modeled in the i rp. there are a number of local project in the bay area. you can see some in the central valley and some in southern california. one of our objectives here was to look at the relative cost of resources across the state. solar performs much better in southern california. that has a material impact on our cost. we wanted to look at that to understand how much of a driver that might be. continuing to look ahead. what have we done? what are we planning to do on the local investment side? on the supply, we have sort of separated these two into buckets.

there is the supply side, which is th the acquisition of energy from plants and the demand side measures to reduce or influence consumers demand within san francisco. on the supply side, we have been and will continue to conduct regular standard procurement of clean and renewable energy with a preference for local projects. i do want to say the development community knows this. they know our interest in it. they reach out to us as they are looking to develop projects. we are in regular communication about opportunities that may be coming down the pipe. i mentioned earlier we implemented a netted energy tariff that facilitates customer investment in rooftop solar, and we are almost done enrolling

those customers in the program. we started to develop a feed and tariff program. that is an ongoing procurement for renewable energy that would be very targeted at new development right here within the city and county of san francisco. under the feed-in they offer a standard contract with a fixed price. publish that and invite developers, owners of property to contract with us. that price can be adjustrd over time depending on the up take of the feed-in tariff. that is a way to get new solar on rooftops under-utilized within the city. they may not have the demand needed to support their own behind the meter project. this is more of a supply type of project. we will continue and we have

been offering incentives for customer investment in rooftop solar, and we are planning to issue r.f.p.s for new construction on the city owned and controlled property. on the demand side, we have been working on insuring that customers and our ratepayers know what is available today. it is important to know that clean power sf customers continue to contribute to public purpose funds that go towards energy efficiency programs and projects. they continue to be eligible for those incentives. we are working to make sure they are aware of those opportunities while we work on developing our own programs to serve gaps that may exist. we plan then really to expand

with the goal of targeting creating locally responsive energy efficiency and demand response programs. one of the things that is exciting is being able to try thinks, to test things out in a pilot environment, to efficiently respond to a customer interest within the city or need that may be under the pg&e programs not addressed due to their large size. then another important category here that we want to focus on is spurring investment and building and transportation elec electtrification. i don't have any content on the city wide climate inventory. one thing you will see is that the electric demand within the

city is a relatively small and shrinking, rapidly shrinking portion of the city's carbon foot print. what remains are challenging wedges like transportation and natural gas use in buildings. the exciting opportunities on the horizon are with to helping further electrify, switch fuels from burning gasoline to using clean power in automobiles or other transportation systems, and within the home. this is my last slide. we are at a critical juncture in the implementation of the clean power sf program. as a result our team is very focused on insuring we are successful with the april enrollment effort.

we skipped over that content. i know you have heard it before. we are enrolling 280,000 accounts, more than twice the number we are serving today. that is the best way to ensure success and ability to influence the city's carbon footprint as it pertains to energy use to ensure successful rollout of the program at this time. that also means that we procure to meet all of the regulatory obligations and power content goals in short and long-term. i talked about a contract before the board to support short term needs. we have more long-term contracting to do soon to ensure we meet the state's requireds renewable energy purchases in the portfolio. we highlighted key actions and

timelines for supporting the enrollment and moving beyond. first, finalizing the rate change. we had a hearing earlier this week before the board. we are waiting for the california pc to take action on the rates so we know where they will end up. wever shortly have to commence sending notices to the customers we will be enrolling in april that starts in february. we have to send four notices over a four month period strateling the april enrollment. we are little working on a bay area newable energy solis station. i talked about the focus on the region. we want to reach out to the community to find out what opportunities exist in the near term to develop resources within

the nine area counties t to buid that local content in the energy portfolio. i have identified march for that. the april enrollment occurs in april. we then starting in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year will be commencing work on our 10 year capital plan. then really following the successful enrollment into the program we intend to really direct a lot of our energy and efforts towards creating new local energy programs for customers to really drive local investment. we are looking forward to coming back to this body and reporting on ideas and getting input and getting some of those going. with that i will stop and i am

happy to take your questions. >> let's start with commission pollock then. >> thank you so much. i think this is so helpful, this answers a lot of the questions that we have. i want to jump around a little bit to the presentation because i have some notes. going back to slide 24. just looking at the priority sites, they look very similar to the sites that were in the 2015 inter next report. that also identified the sfo

parking lot and hunter's point parcel e sites. what is the status of those projects and are there what you say between r.f.p.'s on 25? >> i think those two sites you mentioned fall into that category of an r.f.p. for projects on city property. those particular projects were not modeled but in this particular irp but it doesn't mean we won't or can't. we absolutely can. we focused on what we thought were the best projects in the near term from a cost standpoint, but the beauty of the irp is that we are starting the next one this year so we can

model cases and develop a business case for any of these projects we looked at in the past or new projects. >> what are the steps required to make those projects shovel ready? >> there probably needs to be feasibility work from an engineering standpoint, probably working with the entities that control the site a bit further, for example the airport. preparation of r.f.p. those come to mind immediately. i am happy to get more information on what it would take. >> that would be great to understand that better. is funding for that beginning work including in the sfp budget currently?

>> not explicitly. we do have work for planning purposes sort of broadly. the irp. we do have under professional services as needed contracts a number of engineering firms that do this kind of work and we have worked with them in the past on these kinds of projects so it is certainly possible for us to direct some of that capacity towards supporting these efforts. >> thank you. i know that there are for me a lot of questions in terms of distinction between the power enterprise and clean power sf. i know that is sf p.u.c. looks at them very differently. for those in san francisco at least for me it seems power is coming the same t