place to protect people, what rules, because everyone knows what i'm talking about. the police report was on the news. i want to know what policies we have in place for what people have to get those reports. >> thank you. >> okay. we will call for public comment on any item pertaining to two -- two a route two d., you are limited to three minutes. >> good evening. >> good evening. i'm sorry to report that my bike was stolen in the city three days ago, hardly a major event. so i was listening to all these things, and regarding the youth programs, i hope that they greatly emphasize that a lot more gardening should be included, and you have a lot of availabilities to do that in the

beautiful golden gate park and such. i am here speaking peter, and with spec to chiefs got in the s.f. p.d. and thumbs up to the mayor, i believe and state that law enforcement is stuck in the middle of a sent tonic riddle, and it is ash wednesday. where we reflect and repent, the king of kings never lies, never dies, suffers neither fools nor alibis. as you do under the least of me, it came out of the gospel, and was reference to the animals we clearly see. so, the u.s. constitution has also been disregarded. i pray this answer will be a causation for change. why or more black males treated more aggressively nationwide, and this seems to be the case

for a very long time. let it be that you clearly see through spirit, it is because the world has always, to this moment, hated even now, the master carpenter with the will and hair who also spoke clearly about lawyers. the bar association and service to papal law has long usurped by ku all three branches of government, and ongoing treasonous truth. the opposed -- they oppose assistance to the homeless, otherwise they'd be suing every church for false advertising, love one another, do unto one another. perhaps the reason for the high incidence of aggression towards hispanics might be because every fourth one of them is named jesus.

so it seems that religious leaders and deceivers would rather rule in help then served in heaven. the churches could easily take in all the homeless, but instead, they would rather see the camps filled up. they're over 4 million people in the camps, but before obama started, these people were not sent back to their countries, they were sent to camps, they're quarantined camps, work camps, menchaca camps, children's camps, women's camps. i wish to address one last thing regarding traffic -- >> thank you. >> thank you. >> all right, thank you. yes, you do. general public comment. >> this is public comment on items we just covered. >> good evening.

>> pleased to hear that we are addressing bias. we should address it daily, and perhaps even in this body. i have not seen the same instances in quite some time, but we should be mindful not to interact with the men on this commission in the same way as the women. i grew up any matriarchy. perhaps i am sensitive to this, but i feel that i see it and i think if you preventively admonish commissioners when they're looking for a point of clarification and then interrupting another commissioner, and then proceed to interrupt another commissioner, and then asked to have something put on the agenda, back to the same discussion we've had about what is a comment, what is a

discussion, it seems to be targeted, and i think we have done well to address it before we can do it again. i really appreciated commander lazar's presentation. i think he supports something i've addressed with this body before, which is that we give law enforcement too many things to do in such a fashion that guarantees failure. he knows that the team does a better job of marketing services availability. i think he is onto something there and there's a lot of duties that s.f. p.d. -- we do ask them to do, that would be more sensibly provided by perhaps others, or those who are not militarized. lastly, and the only thing i really came here initially to discuss is something you know about me, i believe, but specifically with regard to the department of police accountability.

i am informed by my experiences. thank you. >> thank you. >> good evening, commissioners. >> good evening. >> i just lost my e-mail that i was going to read from, just one second. okay. i work for the youth and planning services program and a look forward to sharing with them the youth program that s.f. p.d. is doing and the c.b.o. his that we work with. there is a lot to cover today. as a city his server fighter certified spanish bilingual worker, i'm disturbed at the lack of quality translation that was presented tonight. i've seldom had to use interpreters, but i do know the translator cannot add or guide questions, but it is unacceptable that vital information such as an injury was not translated. whoever sees the contract with the third-party contractor needs to demand accountability or change contractors. if it is an in-house translator,

that person needs to be retrained or released. i'm also troubled by the report on the homelessness sweep. first and foremost, i find this model has already been alluded to before, and it is completely backwards. we need social workers and mental health professionals taking the lead in the outreach with s.f. p.d. merely on standby as a backup for safety. all parties came up with a model to rework it and police officers are not social workers and will not be able to have the success of those trained to nurture and support vulnerable people. we also need to allow people to bring pets and possessions to the shelters. people are turning down a short-term shelter because they are forced to relinquish their scarce survival supplies. it is also appalling to think that people are expected to travel to 2323 cesar chavez to retrieve their belongings. it is not rocket science, it is a logistical nightmare.

the question that was asked, why compensate -- confiscate tense, basically a person's home, as evidence? as a taxpayer, i resent the district attorney making this much effort to prosecute those who have nothing. finally, i am very uncomfortable with the integrity of an investigation into the death of jeff adachi, which i do consider necessary. that should be an investigation to make sure there was no foul play. but considering -- i'm sorry, but there is deep hostility that the sfpd has demonstrated towards him, it concerns me they are the lead investigators in this. i am outraged by these leaks. as a city worker, i don't know how this violation can occur without consequences. in my department, we take confidentiality very seriously and so should the san francisco police department. finally, i witnessed something on the bus a week after i gave testimony about how good things are. this police officer came right up to a homeless black man with such hostility and he pushed him

to get him off the bus. when he ask about the incidents, if it had been me, i bet it would have been, excuse me man, can you calm down or step off? with him, it was get off -- >> thank you. >> good evening. >> okay. in the late 1980s, i started my volunteer community work in the southeast sector to address many -- addressed many public safety needs, especially for the nonenglish-speaking victims. back then, police reports were mainly in english. therefore with the language barriers, cultural inhibition, political repressions, fear of retaliation, et cetera, it all resulted in many nonand underreported cases. later, a commander who was our captain then initiated.

however, in the case of the non-english-speaking people on mission's speak -- mission street whose calls were not responded to 44 hours, we don't want this case to be have a damper put on the case so far. we think the survivors to attending to this matter, and of course, to the police for the application -- apprehension of the two perpetrators. most of all, it is important for the emergency department and police to identify the causes of the problem and define ways to avoid such a serious gap in police response time in the future. when i went to see him ten days ago and before that, i was sorry that despite his broken finger and injury, he still ahead many tasks to respond to in his

little mom and pop store. i'm assuming they made some requests. he wanted to make sure that the time the response of police calls in the future, especially for the non-english-speaking populations. he would like to see more police patrols around the area because his business, and he told me some of the others suffered as a result, financially. he would like to see surveillance cameras as strategic locations and to see if there is any way that the city can help a business like his to have surveillance cameras inside as well. he wants to see that there should be a multilingual approach for all the businesses around so they can have that easy access and i gave him a list of places to call, and hopefully the city will respond. thank you for opening this up and making this a big issue

because as i said, i work with city cars for 37 years in the evening, and i have taught immigrant children for 35 years in the daytime. all my life has been with this population. as i said, i started this because my fellow neighbors and residents were embattled in those days. >> thank you very much. thank you for your service too. okay. public comment is now closed on those items. next item. >> line three, discussion and possible action to approve issuance of department bulletin, responsibility for booking -- modifying department general order 7.01, juvenile policies and procedures, a change from the dg oh, was in front of the police unit, processing and

transporting a juvenile that has been improperly booked. they shall process and transport the juvenile. action. >> thank you. assist with the department? >> this is the department bulletin that addresses a very rare incident, but has happened in the past where a juvenile may have given wrong information at given a date of birth that makes them an adult when they are inadvertently booked in county jail, and we identify them to be a juvenile. the responsibility is to ally with southern station to transport the juvenile to a different station. it is a responsibility to be transferred to the station that made the initial arrest. >> okay. yes? >> reading this, will there be a delay in transporting the juvenile? the way that i read it, i'm trying to figure out what it looks like logistically, so they

bring the juvenile to the county jail where he is then booked, as the officer who arrested him, is he or she still there waiting on sight at the county jail to determine where the juvenile goes, or does that officer leave and then once county jail determines in fact it is a juvenile, belong there, do they then need to call the officer back? i am trying to -- i guess my concern is whether or not this last time where the juvenile is stuck at the county jail rather than being transported where they need to be. >> usually the way it works, usually they are identified they are fingerprinted during the processing process. they identified as a juvenile and immediately segregated and taken out of the jail facility because you can't have juveniles and adults jail facility, and then they will immediately dispatch the station units that arrested them to come in and

take the juvenile and transport them to the jail. >> so they have to -- they don't have to wait for the arresting officer to come back? if it is all the way in the sunset or they're at the county jail, even though they are quarantined or not with the regular population, how much time are we -- are we putting a time limit on that? how long will they have to stay there? >> this has been the process 44 years now. the reason why -- this has been the process for four years now. we haven't experienced it, it is very rare. but at that time, theoretically, yes, maybe ten or 15 minutes for a unit to be dispatched, but we have not had any issues. >> the reason this is coming up is because this conflicts with a general order. >> correct. >> you are asking us to approve this department bulletin because of the conflict. the only request i would have is we also bring up the general

order, calendar that to change the general order so it is consistent with the department bulletin. this will not make sense five years from now when we have bulletins that are contradicting general orders. >> yes, we well, as part of the general order review process, all general orders will be reviewed. i believe there are several other issues that we may need to be addressing with regards to juvenile procedures. >> okay. , as long as there is a note made that this should be included as well. >> yes. >> can i have a motion to approve this revision to the department bulletin? >> so moved. >> second. >> any comment? we need public comment on this before we vote. just on this item. any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. all in favor? imac. >> the motion passes unanimously >> line four, discussion and proposed action of the disciplinary penalty under --

under full guidelines of this were members of the sfpd for purposes in meeting -- discussion and possible action. >> this matter was tabled at the last meeting so that we could take input from any commissioner who wanted to suggest changes. we do have a few changes that have been submitted. one is on page 4 where language is stricken, instead of reading the misconduct reasonably and negatively impacted, and now just raise the misconduct negatively impacts, and then we have a change on page 17 of 19 where we are adding a -- it is proposed we add for discrimination in bias policing. normally engaging and biased policing or discrimination, and referencing d.g.o. 11.07. and then there is also a change on page 18 where, again, in

addition to bias, the words, or discrimination are added in the disciplinary matrix. i don't have any issue with the changes. i think they make sense. are there any comments? >> thank you. there is one thing that i wanted to bring up, especially having reviewed the 96 report and digesting it, i think there should be a different word to use with respect to the bias policing on page 17 where you say knowingly engaged in bias policing, because the whole concept of implicit bias is it being unconscious knowledge, you are unconscious of the bias, so the knowledge aspect or component is not there. i think it is counterintuitive to say knowingly engaging in bias. i'm not sure what word to put there, or how you would describe it, but i think -- >> there is a problem with that. this is a first opens termination.

this is for somebody who knowingly engages in biased behaviour and we are throwing them off the police force, as opposed to somebody with unconscious bias, and i think the discipline might be a little different, or the approach is different. i don't know if it is covered somewhere else, i think it may be. >> implicit biased is premised on the fact that, you know, you are not aware of it, it is just there. i think it has to encompass that, and i think saying knowingly engaged in bias is counterintuitive to implicit bias, or the concept or if of implicit bias. >> maybe they should be separate categories and dealt with differently by the department and by this commission. >> i think the problem there is everybody is biased. everyone is to some degree. that is what implicit bias is. we all walk around with biases.

without some kind of fuller qualifier, make it a first 8:50 pm terminable a fence, it doesn't give a lot of clarity to anyone as to what that means. i think we do need to parse that and break down what we are talking about, because everyone on this commission is biased in some way. if they were to take a test, we've all got its. if you don't, you just don't know you have it. i think we need a little bit more than that before we terminate people right off the bat. >> i want to talk about the knowingly part. i want to put some clarification seen. on page 17 of page 18 and 19, we talked about discrimination, we are also changing the second oh, fence termination, and there is no third fence -- there is no

third fence. there's only two oh, fence is, it doesn't get a third. and unknowingly, a question i have, how do you show knowingly? it is a finite term. how do you show that? that was my only concern. how do you show that?

>> just an observation, commissioners, i participated in the development of this matrix, and on page 17 where we referenced the bias policing, this section applies to the police services that we are providing to the community, and referencing d.g.o. rev -- regulates workplace conduct in terms of employee conduct towards another employee. so referencing d.g.o. will trigger other investigations. i don't know if it is the intent of the commission to send these investigations to d.h.r. to conduct other investigations versus other investigations. i think that is an issue we need to ferret out. >> as it covered somewhere else? >> it is on the next page. page 18. that is fine. workplace bias or discrimination, but using -- referencing d.g.o. in this

section may inadvertently trigger a layer of review that i don't think the commission intends -- when we are talking about bias and discrimination against a community member. >> it is my understanding that d.h.r. -- this does cover coworkers, and in the workplace discrimination, and that they will do their independent investigation as the h.r. department for the city, but i also think it covers instances where, for example, they have done an investigation, and whatever their findings are are sort of irrespective of what our findings would be, meaning that that instance could still come up under this section, even though d.h.r. has its own findings, and then it would be included in the section, meaning, just because d.h.r. does an investigation, does not necessarily take it out of our realm in terms of somebody engaging in discriminatory practices. >> the d.g.o. 1107 is for the

workplace. and this provision just deals with policing. >> correct. to address your question, we would investigate those instances of biases against the community member. workplace discrimination would be investigated by d.h.r. they would return their findings and recommendations to us and within then issue a recommendation and make -- may come before this commission depending on the level of discipline that is being imposed, but what i think this may tend to lead to as a bias complaint against a member of the community that may trigger because 1107 does not require another layer of review by e.e.o., which i don't think it does. they would say we have to send it back. i want to avoid confusion by including it here, that doesn't mean it takes the commission out of the discipline process.

d.h.r. doesn't impose discipline, they just issued their findings and then it comes back to the commission for review. >> so your request is to delete the d.g.o. 1107 reference? >> correct. >> the time -- turned bias into scrum nation his fine. there is similar language in in a five-point 17. >> yeah, leaving the bias, by striking out the d.g.o. 1107 that is covered in the next page

>> i think it is good point. it makes me think that we need to take this better to the working group and deal with just the implicit bias issue and figure out what kind of discipline we want to recommend to the commission because it doesn't fall squarely within that category, but it is something that may subject an officer to discipline. >> especially in light of the 96 report. >> right. [laughter] >> i don't know if we would all catch it, right? >> we certainly do in pith -- implicit biased training so we are aware of it, and we know it is an issue. it is good suggestion.

let's take this off calendar. we will come back to it when we are ready and we will have that meeting off-line. i believe we still need public comments on line item for -- >> okay. public comment. >> good evening. so i'm listening to this situation, and i'm thinking to myself, why is there such a microscope on law enforcement while the bar association liars as minions expounding unlawful opinions are 1,000 times more so brutally problematic than cops at their worst. >> just on the discipline guidelines. we're just taking comments on the disciplinary guidelines. >> that's what i'm talking about. >> the bar association had nothing to do with this. >> well, that's what i amy talking about. if you're not a seer or a sage, you don't know what i'm going

to say. and you just took 20 seconds of my life. not that, you might consider just giving people a half an hour prior to your meeting starting time and just let them say what they wish to say at 5:00. it's kind of rude to have people wait all this time, but that's just my opinion. so regarding law enforcement and their disciplinary situations, you know, i have written down here that, you know, they -- they -- you see you threw me off here, not nice. you know, there's a blue silence and there's a fear of silence with law enforcement to say certain things within the system, the way it's setup and controlled by the bar with harsh realities associated to it, i would suggest you do something a little more supportive and unique in law enforcement that sees corruption and knows that they can't really say anything because if they do, they get terminated physically.

so perhaps you could include a discussion with the cspoa, the constitutional sheriff's police officers association to assure police officers that have something to complaint about that would otherwise get them killed. there have been murders of law enforcement officers over the decades in far higher numbers by their own for speaking out. and i support law enforcement 100%, and the people that are corrupt and destructive within law enforcement are a very small percent, and yet they have maintained these problems and are very lethal for a very long time. so i suggest you look up the cspoa and read about them. they cannot come forward and address certain issues whether they're charged with something or if they wish to share something that would be a benefit to others, okay? and that's part of what i was looking to say, and that --

let's see, let's see. and while law enforcement has sworn an oath to the u.s. constitution, they cannot abide to it because of the extreme pressures of the bar association having controlled three branchs of government as a completely treasonous entity that completely changes the ways of this country and the way it's supposed to be like. >> leave it on for an extra 15 seconds. >> i don't get an extra 20 second. >> you get an extra 15 seconds. go ahead. >> unless you extend and afford them an option out for safety as far as themselves and true protection in support and defense, i implore you to look into the cspoa as they are a constitutionally based operation. >> okay. thank you. thank you. anymore public comment on that

item, just the disciplinary penalties? hearing none, comment closed. next item. >> clerk: line five, general public comment. the public is now welcome to address the commission on items that do not appear on tonight's agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission. speakers shall address the remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individual commissioners or department or d.p.a. personnel. either police nor d.p.a. personnel nor commissioners are required to respond to questions presented by the public but may provide a brief response. individual commissioners and police and d.p.a. personnel should refrain from entering into any debates or discussion with speakers during public comment. >> good evening. >> good evening. [inaudible] >> -- commander lozar used to be at north beach station, and all these things that's going on at this private property where i live at, he came in,

and he dealt with it. he dealt with the messiness from the management on. and now, the reason that i came here tonight because a senior citizen had lost his house keys, and i found them in the mailbox, and i called security and asked them to pick up the keys. they never would, when i took the keys to the office, the man was there, and she was telling him you have to cut into his apartment. i said the only thing you have to do to make sure this man is safe in his unit is change his mailbox locks and his door locks, and this woman politely shined me on. now, the area where i told you the police killed in the robbery, it's still going on. there's a lady by the name of cheryl, and she has a husband by the name of anthony. the address is 640 francisco, apartment 1511. they've been coming here, i

guess when they supposed to clear the unit, they standup, they post up, they threatening and intimidating. they don't care who comes around. the manager last friday was standing in the complex looking at the house and knew there was vagrants there, and she didn't do nothing. maybe you need to call commander lozar to deal with this situation, because he knows exactly how to deal with this lady. thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you very much. one more round, if anybody within the sound of my voice is heading back to snohomish county, i need a ride. so we've addressed the concerns of the african american community, the hispanic community, but barely touched on the asian community.

four of the asian community's top leaders have been assaulted, incarcerated, and murdered. and the fact is that it is clearly comprehended, accepted as fact in several communities, including those in the intelligence communities that mayor ed lee was subjected to the very same technology as jeff adachi, which is a coronary inducing frequency lasered tesla based technology. again, this is accepted as fact in certain circles, for cause, for causes that are connected. ed lee was upset and speaking out against the corruption and the corrupt judges that sent shrimp boy chow into prison. he was innocent of the charges. you might ask dianne feinstein, who arranged that.

a $3 million setup, a three year setup to get shrimp boy chow in prison because only then could they proceed in putting leland yee, and convict him, and he was also innocent. and so the technology is rather common, and it's been around for a long time, and it's available to very few people within law enforcement and the military, but they have leaked out. it's common knowledge that law enforcement nationwide has direct energy weaponry technology with crowd control frequencies. it's common knowledge, but the individual that will take someone's heart out from 30 yards away is very common, also. it's just not well spoken of. and so the investigators have no problem in realizing how to locate certain individuals based on cell phone signatures in regards to time frames and

proximities of both those cases to make a common connection. and there's also a $500 million lawsuit filed five or ten years ago by a very intelligent woman that was subjected to this very type of technology and was injured internally. and then, she sued the city of san francisco, the police department, certain -- a particular officer who was named who she witnessed as being the perpetrator, using the weapon on here, and that's named in the lawsuit. and other individuals. the first judge accepted this lawsuit based on merit alone, so i submit to you, ed lee and adachi were both murdered, and there's no -- [inaudible] >> thank you. good evening. >> okay. again. i'm arlene tran. the reason i'm here for the second time is i want to read a letter from the 89-year-old victim, grandma huang.

grandma huang was my ef citizenship student about 30 years ago. her daughter was my student. her granddaughter was at one time my student, as well, and i used to live a few doors from them, so this case is particularly actually dear to me, and i want to read the letter. statement on behalf of family. first and foremost, the huang and yee families would like to express the deepest appreciation to the san francisco police department, the community and the d.a.s office. special recognition goes to captain feliciano and captain hart and by extension the entire department who has worked tirelessly to help them in their time of need. the family would like to thank supervisor shamann walton and the president of the board norman yee for bringing attention to this case. please try tried and true programs in chinatown and visitacion valley.

the family wants this tragic incident to be an opportunity to address community unity and safety both in the immediate and long-term. this has been a trying time for the family as the beloved mother and grandmother remains in the hospital. she's making slightly improvements daily, and out of the intensive care unit. deep gratitude for all the medical personnel. the family continues to be moved by the outpouring of support for the family and well wishes for grandma huang. thank you. >> thank you. >> i believe i forgot to welcome sergeant ware. good to have some fresh blood -- and i've always appreciated sergeant kilshaw, as well. i wanted to take another crack

at how we assign too many tasks and too many duties to law enforcement such to guarantee failure. the best analogy is to require m.m.a. cage fighters between rounds than to solve -- you know, to take diffitudes. they're involved in a chess match with an international master. these are fundamentally opposed activities, and it's very difficult to expect one person to succeed in such disparrate activities. i'm only good at a couple of things, and public comment is not among them. director henderson, if i would be able to speak with you or one of your associates, i would very much appreciate that. >> certainly. >> thank you. >> i just want to say, we have even fresher blood in the room than sergeant ware.

i just want to recognize that. >> good evening. >> good evening. as usual, i'd like to use the overhead. i'm here to talk about my son aubrey abrakasa, who is murdered. -- who was murdered -- excuse me, i'd like to use the overhead. who was murdered august 13, 2006. to this day, i still have no justice for my son. i spoke with his investigator 1.5 weeks ago, and we're still waiting for him to get with me to go and talk with a few other people that were in another case, so i'm still waiting for that, and i hope he comes

through for me. again, these are the names of the persons that murdered my son. thomas hannibal, who is still -- who is a comedian and is still walking around. he has a child himself. paris moffitt, who was released from jail probably a year ago. andrew vadue, jason thomas, and anthony hunter and marcus waminis. i believe the last one is murdered. these are the names of the people that murdered my son. and the former mayor put this in the paper saying we know who did it. we know addresses and everything. if you know this, and if you have that, why would you say that and you don't go and pick

these people up and put them in jail or do something about it? these people are still walking the street to cause more havoc if they haven't already. i am a grieving mother, and after even 13 years, i'm still grieving, you guys, and i don't think it'll ever go away. i just know how to handle it now. i know how to cover it up. it's easy to do in front of other people so that they don't say oh, here come this crazy mama again. i'm not. he's my son, and i want justice for him. i'm wondering, every time i come here if the people on the board can help me, so i don't have to put my son's picture on cards that people on the d.p.w.

tear down. i need a venue. bus born d.m.v., motor vehicles, somewhere. thank you. >> thank you. once again as we say every week, the tip line is 415, 475-4444, if there's anybody who's willing to come forward. thank you. any other public comment? all right. hearing none, seeing none, public comment is closed. i was remiss in not mentioning that sergeant jane campbell is now with us, and i want to thank you, and we look forward to working with you. okay. next line item. >> clerk: six, public comment on all matters pertaining to item eight below, closed session, including public comment on item seven, vote whether to hold item eight in closed session. >> any public comment on the closed session? seeing none, public comment is closed. next item. >> clerk: seven, vote whether to hold item eight in closed

session. >> motion? >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor? opposed? >> motion passes unanimously. >> all right. we are now moving into closed session. thank you all. >> clerk: okay, commissioner, we are back on the record in open session. you still have a quorum. item nine, vote whether or not to disclose any items heard in closed session. >> can i have a motion to not disclose? >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor? opposed? >> the motion passes unanimously. line item ten, adjournment, action item. >> motion to jurn.

-- adjourn. motion? >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor? the motion passes unanimously. thank you. hi left right halt i had a burning doorway to do the right thing and join the department such this we my brother applied and fortunately we'll here and this means a lot i'm home everyone night to study and we workout together and it is a blessing i have a brother

to go home and fed off of one another we're the twins but pretty much we're not treated and individuals sometimes treated as a item if he did something wrong they use the word instead of you the it heroism we're going our our separate ways and good morning our own individuals middle of steadfastly a twin all the it but inside of the district i've seen negative and positive things and with that made me want to be a police officer i want to give back and do public serve always a class president i dealt with everyone and served my class not only be humble enough to serve my class and pierce being a squad leader is a

responsibility of maintaining my squad and being that voraciously person i need to step up to the challenge i believe during the 8 months i fulfilled any dude and after graduation just be a good officer to learn the skill and profession and give to the community to give the best to them and be a helpful hand that's the main thing and the new people coming into the did not know why you're doing it join the department for the right reason and do it to help the community and it is sharing you're time when you get into the department do is commented to the craft and enjoy it along the way enjoy it along the way i encourage you to talk about over with our families and talk 2

over with yourselves ultimately you'll do the job and find a senseably reason for doing it after the hard work everyday for 8 months straight and finally it pays off and you know as honey honor and privilege not anyone can do this job i look forward to getting often the street and learning and hit the ground running it will be a surreal moment day one i thought months here but sat down me and my brother talked about it and we're on the right track and stay focused and walking tloo

>> okay. if i could call this meeting of the board of directors to order. ms. bummer, will you call the role. [role called >> mr. chair, you have a quorum. please be advised that the ringing and use of cell phones, and pagers, and other electronic devices are prohibited at the meeting. any personal responsible for one going off in the room or ringing might be removed from the meeting. so we do ask that you put

your cell phones off because vibrationsdo