tv Government Access Programming SFGTV April 7, 2019 5:00pm-6:01pm PDT
5:00 pm
important function and they work with resident, artists and the artists and the others to make sure they have adequate badging to enter the site and assist in overall management of the galvez where many come to find out before housing. they're the first phase community engagement when they come to the site and assist overall project information. the other big scope is providing support to the cac. that's a very huge task. we have six meetings a month and sometimes we have more than six meetings a month and sometimes we have less when they get cancelled. we have navy meetings and the
5:01 pm
cac subcommittee meetings and making sure the agendas go out on time and making sure there's minutes available and making sure the presentations go out to cac members within 72 hours of that item so members are aware of what's coming before them for a vote or informational. they provide support service to the legacy foundation that occurs before the meeting. it's a lot of administrative work. the big component. the third prong of this rfp are the outreach services which is making sure to disseminate the information for the folks that come to the meetings. and the full cac meeting is broadcast on cpoo. we also make sure people that cannot attend get the minutes. many of that is making sure people are aware the meetings are occurring and the topics
5:02 pm
discussed. in particular on the outreach of scope of services when we talk to the cac, there's definitely an emphasis to make sure the outreach consultant will target the non-english speaking community in the bay view and as it community changes in bay view, we want to have a broad tendan tendance -- attendance in the community and put in the rfp the applicant can demonstrate outreach to diverse communities an non-english speaking communities. of course we will be polling our policy of 50% goal. we have always met the goal for particular contract. and our outreach plan is to advertise in local newspaper, pe website and we'll e-mail it out
5:03 pm
to the list. we have a huge list. the current site office maintains a huge e-mail list to get it out there and we will also put it on the office of the city of contract administration website and of course our cac ambassadors will help get the word out. the next is to release the rfp this week and have a pre-submission meeting to ask questions off the applicants about the rfp itself and the deadline for to us response to the questions is april 24 and the submission deadline is may 7. and we would depending on how many applicants we receive, we will have a panel put together. last time we had two cac members and three oci staff who reviewed the applications and then we could come before the commission
5:04 pm
for the selection of the contractor. that's it at a high level but i'm here to answer question the site office. >> do i have any speaker cards adam secretary? >> >> clerk: ace washington. >> i think he stepped out. >> i have two other announcements i'd like it make. >> >> clerk: no more speaker cards. >> i'll now close public comment. do you have question or comments? i do have one question, what's the total amount? >> it's a three-year contract. the previous contract was around $1 million. we'll see what the proposal is. though it's $1 million it
5:05 pm
doesn't mean it's $1 million. sometimes there's time and material. the executive committee can decide to have outreach and others are regular business. it varies. the last time the contract was close to $1 million. >> you'll put this out. you said this is every three years? >> yeah, we were here before you in 2016 and selected jbr as the subconsultants and he was the contractor before that and before that for those who know willie b. kennedy from the bay view community before she passed, she did the shipyard administrative tasks. >> thank you. >> thank you, madame chair. i wanted to give a quick update on the cleanup status. as you know, we had called in
5:06 pm
california department of public health to do health and safety scan in parcel a, phase 1 and 2. a1 we got a clean bill of health except the marker found. and earlier this year california department of public health completed that scan and released the report. so in november of last year they started on a2 which is the hillside where there's no development. and to date, they've had a full progress report and they haven't found anything other than the naturally occurring potassium. so my expectation is they'll issue another final report in the coming weeks and i'm going to offer and as soon as the final report is done, we can have them come to the commission
5:07 pm
and present on the work they're doing and what they've completed in phase 1 of the project. in addition, some of the residents and artists asked for swipes of their apartments and homes. california of department have conducted over 225 at 70 locations in parcel a. at this time they're not aware of anything coming up but they have to release a report and come back. i wanted to give context on how that's going. in terms of hip -- the navy and epa are still discussing. they have a disagreement on the approach or methodology being proposed. we'll continue to keep you informed or at some point we may need to have them come discussion where they are in the process. i also wanted to inform the commission as you know with candle stick point, i wanted to give an update in the fall of
5:08 pm
2017 there was a presentation and we did a tour with some of you that showed where the retail is coming and they walked away. and five point is now proposing to convert a portion of the retail to commercial space while still retaining a portion as regional retail. as far as we know because we're in the preliminary stages it's going to consistent of 750,000 square feet of office and what with a bit proposed in the 2017 proposal is they'll advance 579 unit of housing for the plan and [indiscernible] and they'll
5:09 pm
introduce an advance some housing obligation. to date they've been doing outreach and we've been working with planning and they've done pro two-presentations at the cac. a community wide meeting at an element and intend to do additional outreach and at some point will want to come to the commission to give an overdue and do a workshop and we're still refining those. this would lead to some action by the commission in the fall that would include a number of amendments of our documents. we're trying to separate shipyard from candle stick. and understanding phase 2 with the cleanup and status of that site we don't know the timing of when it would occur.
5:10 pm
it's taking time. >> thank you. madame secretary, please call the next item. thank you for your report. >> clerk: the next order of business is item 9, commissioners questions an matters. madame chair. >> yes, there's a question from commissioner singh. >> yes. i am sorry to tell you that i'll be leaving the commission and i've been here since 1995. almost 24 years. and before that i was chairman of the parking commission since
5:11 pm
5:12 pm
>> is this the last meet -- meeting? >> maybe one more. they asked me to move to the other commission. >> is that right? which commission is that? >> human services commission. >> my goodness we're going to miss you. you'll be one more meeting. >> i won't leave alone. >> commissioner singh thank you for your service. you took us by surprise. we'll see you at the next meeting, commissioner singh.
5:13 pm
>> this is not his last meeting. i wasn't aware so it can't be. >> i wasn't aware either so it caught us by surprise. okay, any other commissioner questions and matters. >> i have one. >> yes, commissioner rosales. >> we will be together the next meeting. i'd like to ask a follow-up to what commissioner bustos suggested with respect to the item on related is an engagement with the planning department. i would say the planning department not the planning commission. and i would like to understand our jurisdiction and concurrent jurisdiction with planning with
5:14 pm
respect to our management and regulation of uses in trans bay. >> thank you. i would follow-up on that. any other fellow commissioner questions and matters? okay. thank you. well, i wanted to say i'd be able to follow-up with related and get an update on their plans for the space now that the grocery requirement has been removed. please call the next item madame secretary.
5:15 pm
>> clerk: the next order of business is item 10, kroefd -- closed items and there are no item and next item is adjournment. >> i'd like to close the meeting in the honor of the late public defender. if you'd like to say something about him. >> i'd like to say in my experience, i was never a public defender but i have many friends in the public defender's office and i counted jeff as a friend and fearless leader. >> yes, public defender jeff adachi was a friend of the filipino community and he'll be missed. so fellow commissions i need a
5:16 pm
motion to adjourn. >> i'd like to say also representing the city as a native and western addition, hunter's point and serving the bay area as an inner city missionary, the youth i watched over from the '60s and now working in bay view with the young people, he was always visible and is very much missed. i'm just praying someone is taking the mantle to continue to serve our city. >> thank you. >> jeff was an incredible human being. he was a fearless fighter for all that is right in people. she sorely missed.
5:17 pm
5:19 pm
moffett, i am an assistant medical examiner for the city and county of san francisco. i perform autopsy, review medical records and write reports. also integrate other sorts of testing data to determine cause and manner of death. i have been here at this facility since i moved here in november, and previous to that at the old facility. i was worried when we moved here that because this building is so much larger that i wouldn't see people every day. i would miss my personal interactions with the other employees, but that hasn't been the case. this building is very nice. we have lovely autopsy tables and i do get to go upstairs and down stairs several times a day to see everyone else i work with. we have a bond like any other group of employees that work for a specific agency in san
5:20 pm
francisco. we work closely on each case to determine the best cause of death, and we also interact with family members of the diseased. that brings us closer together also. >> i am an investigator two at the office of the chief until examiner in san francisco. as an investigator here i investigate all manners of death that come through our jurisdiction. i go to the field interview police officers, detectives, family members, physicians, anyone who might be involved with the death. additionally i take any property with the deceased individual and take care and custody of that. i maintain the chain and custody for court purposes if that becomes an issue later and notify next of kin and make any additional follow up phone callsness with that particular death. i am dealing with people at the worst possible time in their lives delivering the worst news
5:21 pm
they could get. i work with the family to help them through the grieving process. >> i am ricky moore, a clerk at the san francisco medical examiner's office. i assist the pathology and toxicology and investigative team around work close with the families, loved ones and funeral establishment. >> i started at the old facility. the building was old, vintage. we had issues with plumbing and things like that. i had a tiny desk. i feet very happy to be here in the new digs where i actually have room to do my work. >> i am sue pairing, the toxicologist supervisor. we test for alcohol, drugs and poisons and biological
5:22 pm
substances. i oversee all of the lab operations. the forensic operation here we perform the toxicology testing for the human performance and the case in the city of san francisco. we collect evidence at the scene. a woman was killed after a robbery homicide, and the dna collected from the zip ties she was bound with ended up being a cold hit to the suspect. that was the only investigative link collecting the scene to the suspect. it is nice to get the feedback. we do a lot of work and you don't hear the result. once in a while you heard it had an impact on somebody. you can bring justice to what happened. we are able to take what we due to the next level. many of our counterparts in other states, cities or countries don't have the resources and don't have the beautiful building and the
5:23 pm
equipmentness to really advance what we are doing. >> sometimes we go to court. whoever is on call may be called out of the office to go to various portions of the city to investigate suspicious deaths. we do whatever we can to get our job done. >> when we think that a case has a natural cause of death and it turns out to be another natural cause of death. unexpected findings are fun. >> i have a prior background in law enforcement. i was a police officer for 8 years. i handled homicides and suicides. i had been around death investigation type scenes. as a police officer we only handled minimal components then it was turned over to the coroner or the detective
5:24 pm
division. i am intrigued with those types of calls. i wondered why someone died. i have an extremely supportive family. older children say, mom, how was your day. i can give minor details and i have an amazing spouse always willing to listen to any and all details of my day. without that it would be really hard to deal with the negative components of this job. >> being i am a native of san francisco and grew up in the community. i come across that a lot where i may know a loved one coming from the back way or a loved one seeking answers for their deceased. there are a lot of cases where i may feel affected by it. if from is a child involved or things like that. i try to not bring it home and not let it affect me. when i tell people i work at the
5:25 pm
medical examiners office. whawhat do you do? the autopsy? i deal with the a with the enou- with the administrative and the families. >> most of the time work here is very enjoyable. >> after i started working with dead people, i had just gotten married and one night i woke up in a cold sweat. i thought there was somebody dead? my bed. i rolled over and poked the body. sure enough, it was my husband who grumbled and went back to sleep. this job does have lingering effects. in terms of why did you want to go into this? i loved science growing up but i didn't want to be a doctor and didn't want to be a pharmacist. the more i learned about forensics how interested i was of the perfect combination
5:26 pm
between applied science and criminal justice. if you are interested in finding out the facts and truth seeking to find out what happened, anybody interested in that has a place in this field. >> being a woman we just need to go for it and don't let anyone fail you, you can't be. >> with regard to this position in comparison to crime dramas out there, i would say there might be some minor correlations. let's face it, we aren't hollywood, we are real world. yes we collect evidence. we want to preserve that. we are not scanning fingerprints in the field like a hollywood television show. >> families say thank you for what you do, for me that is extremely fulfilling. somebody has to do my job. if i can make a situation that
5:27 pm
is really negative for someone more positive, then i feel like i am doing the right thing for the city of san francisco. >> shop and dine in the 49 promotes local businesses, and challenges residents to do their shopping within the 49 square miles of san francisco. by supporting local services in our neighborhood, we help san francisco remain unique, successful, and vibrant. so where will you shop and dine in the 49? >> i am the owner of this restaurant. we have been here in north beach over 100 years. [speaking foreign language] [♪]
5:30 pm
5:31 pm
[calling roll] >> we have a quorum and we have the director of d.p.a., mr. henderson and chief of police, chief bill scott. >> thank you and thank you all. i first want to start by thanking you, sergeant, for your i understand you're leaving the commission and going on to internal affairs and wanted to thank you for your help over the last year or so. >> clerk: line item 1, adoption of minutes. >> can i have a motion to adopt. >> clerk: we'll have to call for a public comment prior to the vote. >> so moved. >> second. >> now we're ready for public comment. any public comment on the adoption of the minutes for those three meetings?
5:32 pm
seeing none, public comment is closed. all in favor. any opposed? motion passes unanimously. >> clerk: line two, reports to the commission discussion. line 2a report and an overview of offenses occurring in san francisco. chief's report will be limited to a brief description of the significant incident and discussion is whether to calendar future items. major events provide a summary of events including any unplanned events occurring in san francisco having an impact on public safety. commissioner discussion on unplanned events and actives the chief describes will be limit head to calendar for a future meeting. follow-up report regarding the fourth quarter 2018 report in compliance with administrative code chapter 96a. and there's a scratch from the agenda regarding c.i.t.
5:33 pm
presentation. that will be re-calendared at a later time. >> thank you and good evening. >> good evening, commissioner and director henderson. i'll start the chief's report off with the crime statistics update. beginning with violent crime down 16% year to date. violent crime is down 18%. that includes our homicides which we have nine compared to ten this time last year and we're down 10%. we also have a 19% reduction in gun violence from this year to last year. so we had a busy week which i'll get to a little bit later in my report on significant incident. our total property crime is down 16% year to date including an a
5:34 pm
reduction since 2017 year to date this time when we were dealing with our auto burglaries we are down so we're pleased with that. we had a couple major cases, homicide that occurred last week. on the eighth homicide of the year the shooting occurred last wednesday but the victim passed away a week later. the 19-year-old was transported to the hospital. and it happened near l.a. county. a felly -- felony warrant was on
5:35 pm
his vehicle and at 3:31 in the morning the suspect was seen by the california highway patrol which involved a shooting and he was arrested for the murder and assault on the highway patrol officers. this is based on a warrant our investigators issued on that case. he is still in custody in san bernardino county. our ninth homicide occurred march 30th. at third and pasada. the victim was crossing the street mid street when a suspect vehicle drove up and the passenger pointed a gun and fired shots at the victim. it's believed there were as many as three suspects in the vehicle. the incident was captured on surveillance cameras in the area, private owned surveillance cameras and our investigators are work that up. the victim in this case is a
5:36 pm
26-year-old male and another male was shot and injured but is expected to survive his injuries. we had a major traffic collision also on march 31st that resulted in a fatality. this was the result of a collision as vehicles were ration up and down bayshore towards the 101 freeway. the vehicle turned on the freeway, hit a cron -- concrete barrier and the vehicle following the lead vehicle that crashed into the lead vehicle the driver of the lead vehicle was seriously hurt and the passenger had minor injuries and there was a 31-year-old injury in the back seat who was severely injured and later died and the driver of the vehicle is in custody and the investigation
5:37 pm
is ongoing but we expect charges to be filed on that particular incident. we have the opening of the giants starting this friday and we'll be deployed and we expect a lot of fans to enjoy opening day. there are games throughout the weekend. we also have a couple of marches over the weekend but the giants is the headliner for this weekend so we definitely will be deployed for that. that is the first part of the report. it's fairly short but in the interest of time i know the 96a f follow-up is not part of my report. i'll take questions from the commission on the first part of my report and take the follow-up on 96a. >> any questions on what we heard so far? >> you said we that'd ninth homicide this week. do we have nine homicides in a two-week period?
5:38 pm
>> no, just two in the two-week period. one shooting on the 25th and the person died on the 26th and the other one that saturday. >> thank you. >> now we'll present the follow-up. several commissioners had questions regarding our 96a reports and the resulting statistics and data. i'm going to open this up with an introduction on what we accomplish tonight. i know several of the commission members had questions and i'll list those questions out. i have commander teresa ngyen and they'll get to more details so if you guys want to come on up and set up and i'll introduce basically what we plan to present tonight. as i said, the commission requested a follow-up on the
5:39 pm
administrative 96a report that was presented to the commission last month. among the topics that we were asked to follow-up on were the following. more analysis on the number of african americans and other people of color stopped for arrest and how we're analyzing the figures and procedures and protocols. what plans and steps is the department taking to analyze the numbers. what is the department going to do about the disparities and what best practices will the department develop to address the situation. how does the department view the high number of african american in 9-1-1 calls and where is the traffic stop data collection and what is the department to address why the numbers are higher when it comes to men of
5:40 pm
color and an additional question from the commission is does the department keep a database showing the demographics of the alleged victims. i want to begin by asking the questions head on and add contextbury turn it over to -- before i turn it over. as to the first question about analysis and the disproportional number of african americans and people of color. we internally analyze these reports in many ways. the statistics and there's a lot of numbers and a lot of data. in addition, we have other information we analyze. one thing we're trying to establish and the commanders will get into the partner that we're work to and captain ford is establishing benchmarks that will put sense to the data.
5:41 pm
and some of the academic partner that we're work with, hopefully when those reports will be released in the coming months, we'll have better benchmarking to have a more contextual picture of what the data means and you can slice it up many ways. we've done a lot of analysis on our own on it. the important thing is to partner with people who understand data and have it corrected benchmarks we have an understanding of what it means and what we need to do to move forward. we do analyze the 96a report and meet out in and discuss it. what we're trying to do per the d.o.j. recommendations is work with experts in this field to have better data and benchmarki benchmarking so we can make more sense of it and determine what it means to our department and what we need to do moving forward.
5:42 pm
part of what i'll introduce and have the captain follow-up is the road map in what we plan to do and there's six themes to this. we have a road map and it doesn't just start. it started several years ago with some of the policy changes that allow for better data. commission is a big part of that driving policy changes and some will drive issues to the forefront that will make the situation improve. also best practices. we know there's research out there and studies that have been done on other commissions that have yielded some practices and some we're in the process of adopting hoping to address disparities and hopefully drive
5:43 pm
it down. how does the department view the high number of african americans subject to the 9-1-1 calls. we don't really have a method to tracking we do know there's disproportionate numbers in terms of who gets called on. in other words, who the suspects are the public is calling upon routinely about 60% of the suspects are identified as people of color by the public who's calling thanked the african american demographic is usually consistently over 42%. so we have no control over that but we do have to respond to the calls and there are thing we do and need to do and are doing to make sure that when we get to these calls we use independent judgment and we're not impacted
5:44 pm
by whatever the caller's perceptions are. so the answer to that question we do collect some data on who calls particularly when it makes its way to an incident report but we don't have demographic data in terms of 9-1-1 calls in tems of race or gender of callers. is it data from the collection programs? it's from all sorts of information, traffic stops, field interviews, arrests, incident reports. everything that goes in the crime data warehouse is called out and that's the data the 96a comes from and the stops recorded that is then translated into the 96a report. what is the sfpd's plan to address why these numbers are
5:45 pm
higher for men of color and use of force we have a road map to try to get to a better place and a better understanding and impact on the issue. commander ewings and captain ford will talk more about that. is the department keep a database showing the demographics of alleged victims? that we don't do. the calls as we know go into the department of emergency management and they don't keep a database of demographics. we don't have the capability to discern anything from that information because we don't keep that information. when using demographics as a benk -- benchmark there's a number of people of color subjected to force and arrested. one thing want to talk about is
5:46 pm
when we benchmark these numbers to the demographics of the actual calls, they're pretty close in line to the demographics of calls, in other words, when you look at the percentage of persons of color whether they be african americans, hispanics or asians, that the public that calls in are listed as subjects they're in line with the arrest numbers and use of force numbers as well as the detention numbers. actually, the detention numbers are slightly lower. nonetheless, it's still an issue for our city and a national issue. there's a lot of research about this issue on a national scale. we see some of the same thing on a national scale and that's not to make an excuse but toss point
5:47 pm
out this issue goes beyond the san francisco police department and this is one of the driving forces that causes some tension between communities and this city and other places across the country. and police department. so we do know it's an issue and we know it's a difficult issue to both discern and take on but we want to avoid the question and discussion and we're make steps to make the situation better. we realize the status quo is not good enough when it comes to this issue. what we plan to do is introduce and articulate our road map of how we plan to the issue and comes up to respecting safety and all we serve and doing everything in our power that bias whether implicit or
5:48 pm
explicit in our policing is not a driving factor in this issue. with that there's six teams commander ewings and captain ford will talk about and it begins with constitutional policing, training, oversight, accountability, community partnership. those are the six teams. several of these teams focus on really collecting, analyzing, using, sharing data. others focus on developing our people in training and accountability, community partnerships and developing relationships we know will drive some of the cultural change we'll need to address the issue and address disproportionality. before i turn this over and this is just a trend analysis on use of force and has been presented to the commission before but i want to reiterate the commission works hard and took a long time to develop and adopt the use of
5:49 pm
force policy at the tail end of 2016. in the year 2016 we had 3,378 use of forces. 2017 it was down 26% and down, 2018 it was down to 2702. if you compare 2016 to 2018 we see a 28% decrease in total use of force. to dial that down further, when you look at the demographics and i'll look at african americans because that is several of the questions 2016 to 2017, there was a 25% reduction in use of force on african americans in the city and 2017 to 2018 an 11% reduction and when you look at 2016 to 2018 a 34% reduction. so what i want to point out here is that the reduction in that particular demographic really
5:50 pm
outpaved the total reduction in use of force and i think that's a sign of progress for us and i think that's something hopefully everybody's pleased with. the hispanic demographic held steady from 2016 to 2017 as far as that demographic. there was a 21% reduction in 2016 to 2017 in use of force when hispanics were subject of the force and a 9% reduction from 2017 to 2018 and overall from 2016 to 2018 when you look at a two-year window there was a 28% reduction among hispanics. again, i think that's progress. it's definitely by no means the answer. i think it is progress in terms of what we are trying to do. overall we want to reduce use of force and reduce the disparities in disproportionate numbers. last thing, in terms of this
5:51 pm
road map and the six teams i talked about, i just want to point out, constitutional policing is the thread that goes through all of this. we examined the data and our attention and arrest and use of force. we have to do what we do constitutionally and our training speaks to that and procedural justice training speaks to that. training also we are training on enhancing our field tactics which we believe will have an impact in this area and we're also training on social and procedurally just tactic. and we'll talk about our procedural justice training that satisfied that. transparency was another thing. really measuring what matters and not only having good data but also, i talked about the benchmarks and working with academic partner to -- partners
5:52 pm
to make sure we know what we're looking at and we have a lot of data. i spent hours and days look thaeths reports and -- looking at the reports and it's a lot of data and we have to make sense how it relate to this and have to provide that analysis to the public. i think we made many strides in that regard. they're going to explain what those steps have been and what they are in the future. oversight. that's starts with this commission who is the oversight body of our department. also, some things we'll go into detail about, oversight with better relationship with the department of accountability and supporting independent investigations with the district attorney's office and they're independent investigations bureau which we actually have an on an m.o.u. that should be present head to commission and we have an agreement on that.
5:53 pm
accountability. structural reorganization to enhance the risk management capability. we have commander pete wallace in the room who is our risk management commander. that was part of our strick ture change at the commission -- structural change at the commission. when i first got here the commission was advised and agreed with and we believe those types of changes give us better accountability having a command-level person in charge of that unit really has made a difference in my mine. next thing leveraging the body warn cameras capability to increase the transparency we have to leverage that data and leverage what we see on body camera footage and d.p.a. worked on that and from the accountability standpoint, we hold ourselves accountable to our behavior. that has been a huge enhancement and i think this department has
5:54 pm
really done good work to get that policy in place and body worn cameras for this department which was a huge lift and happens in a short amount of time. community partnerships include the data partners we'll talk about here and including feedback internally and externally. our department has to be open and transparent and we have to listen to the community in terms of the expectations an input on our policies. that is happening and we continually strife -- strive to get better and i know there's been challenges with that issue but i know we've gotten better and we have a department willing to be open and listen to feedback from those we are sworn to protect and serve. with that i'll turn it over to commander ewings and captain
5:55 pm
ford. >> thank you, commissioners. first of all, i want to explain why i'm here. i'm the new exec tich -- executive sponsor for bias and i'll be the point person moving forward. in the past five years the san francisco police department has been implement package of reforms to build greater trust when the police and community and make the organization more transparent and accountable to the public we serve. mindful our members are most valued assets, the organization continues to provide a wide variety of ongoing training, robust academy program and strategically designed to produce the best officers to serve san francisco and the
5:56 pm
larger law enforcement community. the san francisco police department remains committed to the model of 21st century policing and a long line of service. the strategic statement. we have come up with a strategic plan to make certain the department is ready to meet modern day policing and be a more fitting conduit for what we stand for, safety with respect for all. in order to get to this point it was a long road and very time consuming by bringing everyone together to work on the strategic plan. there was a steering committee which include the chief, assistant chiefs and deputies and directors and internal focus group that made of approximately 70 sworn and non-sworn members. community input in the focus
5:57 pm
groups centered on implicit bias, policing and diversity. external senior advisors and to name a few, amos brown, made scott of bay view homicide advocates. julie khan of the bar association and the san francisco civic bridge public and private collaboration and the commanders of sfpd and representatives of police employee groups. this is essential as the first steps to develop a road map to safety with respect. in that strategy, we will engage in unbiassed fairness transparent and responsive policing. in the spirit of respect, dignity and in collaboration with the community and be the guardians of constitutional and
5:58 pm
human rights. constitutional policing with procedural justice in policing. fairness and transparency and action, opportunities for voice, impartiality and decision making. >> good evening. i'm here for professional standards and welcome and good evening commissioners, executive director henderson and chief scott. so slide six. training. in the spirit of procedural justice, if you can look to the right of the column first, i'd like to bring some tension to some of the courses that we provide wince procedural justice, managing implicit bias and a 24-hour inclusive
5:59 pm
environment course. if you look to the right of the power point you'll see in the third, fourth and fifth paragraphs you can see exactly not only is it promoting procedural justice as we do so up and down the chain of command. the command staff is involved, sworn staff, civilian staff and managers and supervisors sworn and civilian and we also hold monthly roll call training to make sure they also embrace this concept and theory. specifically, in addressing implicit bias, research including studies by stanford show it plays a role in racial disparity. we provide education and enhanc enhanc enhanc enhanc enhanced supervision. [stand by]
6:00 pm
33 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV: San Francisco Government TelevisionUploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=765774782)