legislation. thank you. >> my name is jenna prensky, san francisco resident. i have recently become close with a mezzanine family, and have spent a lot of time there over the past couple of years. i just want to speak for the exemplary nature as mezzanine as a venue. there is a lot of music venues out there that are not necessarily the safest places where people. mezzanine continues to be a safe and secure place for women to take part in local music and things like that. it is ran by an incredible team of women. i want to make sure that is given it's a voice here. i support this legislation, as well. >> next speaker, please. if there any more speakers, if you would line up behind this gentleman. >> this is a good proposal, and

i agree with it. i wish you would've had it during the younger years when i was in fillmore. each and every one of these people that came up here and explained why they want this, to have this type of protection, they are also crying out because it is their source of income in order to support themselves. this proposal, to displace them, is an example of gentrification. gentrification is a word that is used to discriminate against people based on geographical locations. you are doing it to them, and even though their skin color is not black, it is the same type of treatment that black people had to suffer in the western addition of fillmore. for example, gentrification in washington is taking place, there is an attorney that has the same type of philosophy as me and suing washington, d.c. for the gentrification and displacement of tenants for

high-tech people that is displacing lower income bracket people. this is a derivative of this kind of demonstration that i'm putting before you. can't get you on discrimination based on race, but you are violation their due process and equal protection under the law. it is not equal protection under a law by allowing a high-tech company to come in come and stop negotiating the contract on continuing them to survive and support themselves by letting a high-tech company like twitter come in and displace them. you've got numerous small businesses that went out of business and have been displaced and boarded up. then you turn around i want to find the owner of the apartment building complex because the tenant cannot afford to pay rent there. you're doing the same thing all over again. so, this measure, that man is proposing needs to be in effect and should have been in effect

when jennifer took place in the fillmore. >> next speaker, please. any other speakers after this speaker please line up. >> good afternoon, thank you very much. thank you for the opportunity to be here. i'm speaking on behalf, i am nina miller on foztwo two attorney and i represent todd crittenden from whom you've heard earlier and his brother dave, i been a long longtime attorney. i'm representing them and their brother scott who owns a building. we have heard a lot here today about the hardships of a small business. there are two people here who know that very well. dave and todd have worked very, very hard since the 1960s to keep their small business alive in san francisco. they are really looking to move that to the upper floor, that they lost during the downturn in the 1990s. their hearts, i know, go out to everyone who is working to

support a small business. i have submitted a letter on friday, i have never done this before. i want to make sure i get it correctly, i will submit another copy today outlining our concern and i will submit this to the clerk of the board when it's available. the zoning control, one of our concerns is that the zoning control before you today we don't believe that this is properly drafted interim zoning control resolution or that the subject matter of this qualifies for the interim base. the impact on public health, safety, general welfare, i think it's important to look at those in terms of the business that is trying to move in there is also the issue of the fact that they do have the recorded lease with

micro biz to move into the upper floor, and this would presumably prevent that from happening. >> thank you, counselor. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is jim vargas. i was born and raised in san francisco. i think we definitely need to find a way to save mezzanine. it's been an incredible place for artists musicians, to continue to do their work. losing mezzanine is going to mean a lot to the city. it is one of the only major independent venues of that size capacity. it also gives us an opportunity for a lot of the younger acts coming up to the city to perform there. to play with her their idols and get them on bigger bills. we need to save mezzanine for many different reasons, but to

keep the spirit of san francisco ally. thank you very much. >> no other members of the public for this item. let me close public comment to make a few comments before handing it over to supervisor 15 has sponsored this measure. i want to start with the fact that i introduced a similar piece of legislation, actually much more narrowly tailored as it related to the punchline which i believe is going to result in the outcome that it was intended to result in. this is a much broader geographic scope piece of legislation. while much of the testimony has been about one particular venue, this actually covers a wide swath of territory in district six, primarily district six, that is full of available, late-night institutions that are part of the fabric of the city,

as many people have testified to. as to the contentions by the property owner, i am advised that this is entirely within the powers of the board of supervisors, somebody who authored a very similar piece of legislation to protect another entertainment venue. i intend to vote for it i want to thank supervisor haney for bringing it forward. . >> supervisor haney: thank you terry peskin. i want to thank every who came out today, and spoke. i want to think, i should've said this earlier, folks from the entertainment commission, president of the entertainment commission, is here who has been, and has been working with all of us to try to make sure that the support and protect nightlife citywide. i want to thank everybody from

mezzanine who came out today. i think what you spoke to demonstrated why it is so important that we do this. why it is so important that we not only protect mezzanine itself, but venues like mezzanine. who have been impacted by this legislation and have reached out and said how excited they are about this. we know that, if we do not do this, the forces that you spoke of will continue to displace venues and change san francisco in ways that will be very hard to come back from. a venue like mezzanine is not easily replaced. i think we have seen a number of venues over the last few years that we have been unable to replace, they never can find a home in san francisco. this is something that we take our responsibility to do, very

seriously. this is within our powers to say it is because when the interest to have certain types of zoning uses, to have a higher level of specificity or discretion when certain types of things are happening. particularly when we have seen an area in like soma where nightlife has been critical and essential and we see those venues disappearing. that is where we have to interview -- intervene for public interest. that is what we're doing doing here. you have my commitment to do whatever i can to support and protect these venues, and also that we look for longer-term, more public solutions. it will be a temporary solution and we also need long-term solutions. i want to thank everyone that came out. i also want to recognize and think the cretin brothers and

the representatives that are here, as well. i hope the conversations will continue. i hope you heard today why we are doing this, and why it is so critical that we protect these venues. with that, i hope we can put this forward, chair, with a positive recommendation to the board. . >> chair peskin: i will take that as a motion area supervisor safai will not object. so we will send this to the board. he wanted to second but we do not second things on three committees, hence my words we will send this to the full board with recommendations. without objection. next item, please. >> item number 5, 190458 ordinance amending the planning code and the administrative code to abolish the north of market affordable housing fund and have certain fees collected in conjunction with north of market affordable housing deposited in the citywide affordable housing fund; and making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101.1, and findings of

public convenience, necessity, and welfare under planning code, section 302. >> good afternoon. amy tam. item number five is an ordinance to amend the planning at administrative codes to allow north of market affordable housing fee is to be deposited in the citywide affordable housing fund instead of the north market housing fund. we are requesting this change because we are currently depositing all impact fees into this fund, including other geographically restricted fees. >> you account for them separately? >> we will account for them separately. this is an accounting change that the comptroller recommended we change. we are expecting the fees to come. we would not be changing the use

of the fees which would be for stabilizing and preserving affordable housing @ in the specialties district. >> you said everything this supervisor would like to hear. anything you would like to add? >> thank you. >> good afternoon. i just also want to share that the planning commission heard this item on june 13, during the hearing the commission did recommend approval of the ordinance with a modification to index the fee to reflect today's economy. the proposed fee increase is to change the fee from $5 per square foot up to $25.41 per square foot. i wanted to reiterate that this cleanup is to make the collection of the north market fees consistent with the collection of other affordable housing fees. amy and i are available to answer any further questions. this concludes our presentation. >> any public comment on this item?

>> s. >> okay. >> first of all, any transfer of any fees to the mayor's office on housing, i object to. her testimony verifies how she is only in support of high income bracket housing, okay. she refuses to include low income and very low income bracket people. the majority of the people. you have 8,011 homeless people out in the street. each and every time that you come up here, before the mic on the board coming you claim that it is 100% affordable housing. each and every time, it's time to put in an application, the lowest income requirement is higher than the income bracket

hey you campaign and claim that you want to help. for example, this demonstration that i put before you and it's right across the street from saint anthony's church. it says affordable housing, making it affordable for at least $39,000 per year. the ami scale here shows anybody that is making $39,000 a year, is 35% of the medium. that means everybody's income that is below that bracket, which is a group that is not only homeless, has disabilities in san francisco, is 28,200 people that is in this income bracket that is not included in the so-called affordable housing opportunity. it is disgusting. hundred% nonprofit developer who is putting together 87 unit apartment building complex for a

mere $64,000 -- $54 million. 144 unit apartment building, look at me, please is 144 unit $456 million. here's another three-story building -- that is cheaper than what newsom. >> thank you, mr. wright. your time is up. you have made your point. thank you, sir. seeing no other members of the public on this item. if there is no objection we will send it to the full board with positive recommendation. next item please. >> item number 6, 190459 ordinance amending the planning code to allow operation of a farmers market on the department of motor vehicles field office parking lot at 1377 fell street by allowing an intermittent activity to be located on a lot with a public facility in specified residential zoning districts; affirming the

appropriate findings. >> mr. *-asterisk are you here for this item? the floor is yours. >> good afternoon, thank you chair travertine. the item before he was heard in front of the planning commission on june 20. during the hearing, they unanimously recommended approval of the ordinance exciting opportunity to enlarge the farmers market. there is also discussion acknowledging that there would be opportunity to allow the farmers market at the public facilities throughout the entire city. this concludes staff presentation on i'm available to answer questions. >> it is a simple and straightforward change. any questions from committee members are public comment on this item? @ public comment is closed. we will send this item to the full board with positive recommendation. next item, please. >> item number 7, 190598 ordinance amending the public works code to modify the requirements for obtaining personal wireless service facility site permits; and

affirming the appropriate findings. >> good afternoon. my name is deborah i'm here on behalf of public works to give you a presentation related to personal wireless facilities. to expedite -- [inaudible] the purpose of the code amendments relates to current, state and federal laws to give them the rights to -- [inaudible] read foz -- permits much be issued and allow the city to establish objective design standards. the permitting process takes 90-180 days and does not include objective design criteria. more specificity on the ruling is shown in this light, as you

can see the order establishes a 60 day shot clock for existing facilities and a 60 day shot clock for facilities. the purpose of the amendment first and foremost are to comply with the fcc order. over the last number of months the city departments including the department of technology, planning, public works have been meeting to develop effective and compliant approach to incorporate the fcc order into current processes. the proposed article 25 amendments includes amplification. maintain master license agreements for carriers and communicate the process alike. this slide shows a side-by-side comparison of timeline. the current process takes 90-180 days. the revised process will take 45-60 days and reduces the

process of referrals to other agencies. i will walk through in detail the current and proposed captured in our 25 amendments. this is the current wireless process.

as i mentioned this process does take 90-180 days. this slide is the proposed changes that will impact the process. article 25 amendments to modify the existing permitting process only to include permit. they would similarly review authorizations for wireless abilities on the individual city poles. the permitting process would remain public works to ensure objective design standards and how standards are met. the amended process, the carriers would require clearance prior to their application before working with public works. still refer the application for review. the amended process approved during the protest period. the appeal process would remain unchanged. it would ensure compliance with

fcc order. this slide you can see the proposed process for puc. this process which was developed in coordination would comply with the new fcc order as well. [inaudible] a little bit of the objective design criteria.

as i mentioned the proposed ordinance amendments are supported and are available for question. >> thank you. let me just say, for the record, that the industry owns the united states congress. now that i have gotten that off of my chest. are there any questions from committee members? i think you have done the best with what you have got. thank you for your work, and thank you deputy city attorney sanders for this and thank you for the briefing you gave me in my office area. >> i believe sanders had given you some proposed -- >> i was just going to speak to those right here. clerical amendments on the

following pages. deputy city attorney gartner they are on -- non- substantial clerical amendments. he is nodding his head in the affirmative. we do not need to discuss section numbers 15, 22. i just did it. with that, are there members of the public who would like to testify on this item number 7? >> that is mr. wright. unlike you, i'm not scared of going up against a multibillion-dollar establishment. it was just a radioactive material that is being discharged by these towers that is built by schools. as a result, families, instructors, contract with the preschoolers located right by the tower, because of the radioactive generation that affects the kids, and no scientific studies being done.

it is causing the schools to shut down. and thinking about shutting down. you have no test results to measure the amount of radioactive material that is coming from these towers. about you being affiliated with pg&e, that is the worst he could do is be affiliated with them. the fires that they cause with several counties, caught on fire, about 1 million properties have been lost, and lives lost with defective equipment and it has just been determined that their equipment was notified, several years ago, that it was defective and it was just a matter of time before a fire would take place at a catastrophe level. they still didn't do anything about it. i further object to the governor providing $21 billion to pg&e to help them how their lawsuit area that is a conflict of interest. you're not supposed to be paying off pg&e's lawsuit. just like me, pg&e has several

different types of insurance, they should not be paid off with taxpayers money from their friends and paid off by gavin newsom because he is friends with pg&e. until there is a scientific study done on the amount of radioactive waste that is coming from them towers, and correlating with the health of human beings, particularly kids. i do not want this to move until that is complete. is that clear? >> thank you, mr. wright. i apologize for mispronouncing your name. you are hurting my feelings, because i unanimously passed -- i do want to say i have made a college industry fighting against billion-dollar companies. with that, public comment is closed. colleagues? can we take the amendments without objection?

that will be the order and we will send the item regretfully, as amended, to the full board with recommendation without objection. we are adjourned. women's netwo sustainable future . en's netwo >> san francisco streets and

puffs make up 25 percent of cities e city's land area more than all the parks combined they're far two wide and have large flight area the pavement to parks is to test the variants by ininexpensive changing did new open spaces the city made up of streets in you think about the potential of having this space for a purpose it is demands for the best for bikes and families to gather. >> through a collaborative effort with the department we the public works and the municipal transportation agency pavement to parks is bringing initiative ideas to our streets. >> so the face of the street is the core of our program we have in the public right-of-way

meaning streets that can have areas perpetrated for something else. >> i'm here with john francis pavement to parks manager and this parklet on van ness street first of all, what is a parklet and part of pavement to parks program basically an expense of the walk in a public realm for people to hang anti nor a urban acceptable space for people to use. >> parklets sponsors have to apply to be considered for the program but they come to us you know saying we want to do this and create a new space on our street it is a community driven program. >> the program goes beyond just parklets vacant lots and other spaces are converted we're here at playland on 43 this is place is cool with loots things to do

and plenty of space to play so we came up with that idea to revitalizations this underutilized yard by going to the community and what they said want to see here we saw that everybody wants to see everything to we want this to be a space for everyone. >> yeah. >> we partnered with the pavement to parks program and so we had the contract for building 236 blot community garden it start with a lot of jacuzzi hammers and bulldozer and now the point we're planting trees and flowers we have basketball courts there is so much to do here. >> there's a very full program

that they simply joy that and meet the community and friends and about be about the lighter side of city people are more engaged not just the customers. >> with the help of community pavement to parks is reimagining the potential of our student streets if you want more information visit them as the pavement to parks or contact pavement to parks at sfgovtv.org >> item number one call to order. [roll call] do we have a quorum? >> wonderful. before we begin the meeting some order of business that we would like to view. the first is to think

samaha for his 10 years of service to the treasure island development authority. [applause] he has seen the gamut of what we have done. since treasure island was just a thought. he was there for that. and now to the point where infrastructure is being done in the first housing to be built. over a decade of service to the authority. we think you for your expertise and for your commitment. i think we have something for you, and i will let bob give it. this is just a

small token of our appreciation for your years of service area - - service. >> as fay said it is just a token of our appreciation for decades worth of work with the title board. we want to thank you for all of your support, at work, and helping us to the point we are at today. thank you. >> before i let you talk, i will let the other commissioners say a few words. >> thank you very much. commissioner samaha, one of the things that people want to know about you also is that you are a very well, highly regarded leader in san francisco. so many things you do that sometimes people do not know, and it's a testament to all of us here,

because we are very well ingrained in the community. we happen to know that you are out there, and all of the committees, thank you so much for your dedication. being here sometimes is a thing was job. we are dealing with matters and it is taking a decade to get this far in the development of treasure island. you were there, helping the staff and helping diligently. for that we wanted to say thank you and good luck in your future endeavors. we know when we get off this odium we also see each other in the community. our work is never done and this is just moving onto another transition, but you are still part of the larger san francisco. thank you, sir. >> thank you so much. >> i think the same sentiments have artie been said. really,

truly, thank you for your years of dedication and all of your institutional knowledge. we really appreciate it and i'm sure i will be seeing you around. >> thank you all for your great comments. and thank you for this, this is really nice. i have been really honored to have served here for 10 years when then mayor and newsom put me on this commission. this body consisted of a lot of directors of department, it was the director of planning, the mayor's office of housing, and he wanted to transition this commission into a citizens commission. at the time it made sense for her to be department heads because it was more technical in nature, they were getting ready to do the initial planning. i have had the pleasure to see the transition for the last 10 years, from the conceptual plan to actually doing demolition and hopefully

construction really soon. when i was first added to the commission 10 years ago, i did not know treasure island and i have gotten to know is so much more. i feel very attached to it. there are some wonderful people on this island doing amazing work. sharon williams, a lot of great people, from nonprofits to the developers themselves area there could be a lot of opportunities to create great housing, affordable housing that the city need, the current mayor wants to build affordable housing and we are doing it on treasure island than anywhere else in the city. i really hope that, and i'm sure you will stay focused on making sure that that happened. and, anyway i may come back because i love this mission. thank you again, it was truly wonderful to

be a part of this from the time when commissioner richardson was president under your leadership, linda, it was wonderful, and you have been true leaders, and all of this commission has had some great work and i'm sure you have a lot more to do in the next five years or so. good luck to everyone and i will be seeing you around the community. it is a small city and we will all be around. thank you very much. [applause] >> thank you very much. >> as we say goodbye to jean-paul. let's say welcome to our new commissioner, who is the chief operating officer and head of governmental for the academy of sciences. he was also a puc commissioner. he comes to us

with a lot of experience about different energy, and utilities, we think that his experience and his knowledge is really going to aid us welcome to you. we are so glad that you will be joining us at treasure island development authority. would you like to say a few words? >> i have a lot to learn. i'm honored to be in this company. i hope i serve the citizens of san francisco effectively. i am a sponge. anything you want me to learn send it my way. >> welcome aboard. let's go to the next item, please get >> general public comment. to allow members of the public to address treasure island development authority board on matters that are with the subject matter jurisdiction i do not appear on today's agenda. public comment will be held during each item on the agenda. members of the public may

address the board for up to three minutes. you will hear a single time when there are 30 seconds remaining. please state your name and the organization you are representing, if any, for the record. >> good afternoon commissioners. sherry williams from one treasure island. welcome commissioner quan i look forward to working with you. i was doing some quick math we've been in over 100 meetings together over the course of the last 10 years. [laughter] who knows how many meetings we will participate in together. i want to get a few quick updates. a few months ago, the financial empowerment did a study on the student loan debt that is pretty much plaguing our nation. notice disproportionately there were treasure island residents had a lot of student loan debt. to that effect we are partnering with housing and economic rights advocates to do a series of

workshop and also provide direct one-on-one legal counseling on some of their student loan issues get anybody from the community that might be watching this, we want to make sure that they know about it, but also want to let the commissioners know that we have responded to this and i have some flyers here and i will put them there. the second thing is is that we have our second alliteration of our family resource guide. i believe you all got a copy. there is a section in the very front that says any constructive comments could be sent to a certain email. i know bob has some ideas in terms of improving the information on the layout. we might have another winter copy of this. one thing i think it really highlights is that there are a tremendous amount of activities for families and youth on treasure island and most of them are free. that is something i think we can all feel pretty good about. and then lastly part of the city's

initiative, city drive initiative to increase the number of folks with the class b license. we have our driver education program happening right now as i eat. in august are going to have the fourth construction training program. i think you all know, you've been a great supporter of it. we have had 15 graduates in previous classes, upping it to 25 graduates this year because of all of the work that is about to happen on the island. we want to make sure low income san franciscans have the tools and skills they need. that is just a brief update of what is happening and thank you. >> anybody else that would like to address the board? not on the agenda? these come up. >> i am walt, vice president of the treasure island museum. on

the occasion of publishing our biannual report which is in your packet this is a good time for me to introduce our new president. i'm not going anywhere, going to continue to be primarily responsible for our website, our series which is in their 6-seventh year, i tracked the exhibitions. but now that our capital campaign is rolling, and the board thought it was time for new leadership that would take us to the next level and make the capital campaign succeed. i would like you to meet our president. >> welcome, mike. >> i am president of the board of directors for the treasure island museum. i promise i will be brief. i thought it would take you there a couple of the highlights of our annual report to let you know where we are at. on the financial front if you take a look in here, if you don't have to know. it looks like we have raised in the last year and half of our campaign 600,000 dollars so far. we are very gratified it looks like our

message is getting traction and people are responding to them. we are right on target for ramp-up fundraising targets. in addition to that in the last four months we have added two new board members. also in oakland a business owner and winemaker. luckily it looks like our message is resonating with them as well. we are very proud to have them with us. from the program side we have been continuing with our lecture series we are getting a lot more attendance week after week. in addition to that, we have just completed a partnership with the mellon foundation, fives rodents have chosen us for their paid internship and spent the summer on the island and we are hoping we can continue with that and do summer programs next year. two or more of the student have

opted to continue to finish out the projects and the things they have planned and the things that they learned with us to get finally, i think going forward we are looking at reaching out to one treasure island, lifelong learning academy. we are trying to create opportunities for students and the community on the island. a part of this, it too early to say how things will turn out. we've got a very good response we hope to come back to you with some exciting news to get what we want to take away from that is a message that we would like this museum to be a vibrant community resource for students and residents on the island. to wrap up, i want to thank the board for your enthusiasm, your son worked and your encouragement, because we could not have done any of this without you. we hope as a result of this together we can build a museum in conjunction with the vision we see it to be. >> think you for your leadership at the treasure island museum. i know you were involved for so

many years. welcome michael for your new leadership. it's always difficult with a nonprofit starting out and raising capital campaign. we wish you luck and we are glad you are in partnership with treasure island. >> seeing no other people who want to address the board. next item please read >> thank you. as sherry mentioned, one treasure island is the family resources guide and we really are looking for feedback from resident, and other community members who might have some additional thoughts and additional information to be incorporated

guide. we will be celebrating national night out on the island. the treasure fest went off on june 29 and 30 without any problems jack nathanson did a lot of work trying to get the word out to public outlet that really help control the turnout that we had on the fourth of

july we will looking to repeat that effort on fleet week as well as new year's eve. although we did push to get the word out, we also did prepare to have turn out, if it came. an encroachment permit, if we needed to close a lane for traffic exiting the bridge come onto the bridge, after the fourth of july. as well as having westpark to assist with traffic control and provide changeable message boards around the island to direct people to what remained of the great lawn. i have some statistics in on that may gigantic three cleanup on the island. they collected just short of five ton of debris from the island to more than two thirds of that was able to be recycled. the sign shop is

updating the street signs in the residential neighborhood. to freshen up some of the signs that were getting faded to replace them with city standard street signs. coming up in august, the port of oakland is going to be conducting some repairs on their property which will interrupt electrical service to the island. fortunately with the standby generators that we have will be able to put the entire load of the island on down by generators so, between four a.m. and five a.m. on saturday the seventeenth, there will be a temporary power outage while the load is transferred from the oakland feed to the emergency generators and then another cut over after midnight on the eighteenth to put the load back

onto the submarine capable area we will be working on notification and flyers for resident to let them know well in advance of the impending outage. the mercy catholic charities project award from the affordable housing communities grant program is now official. that's 20,000,000 dollars with 13 point seven of that going to the housing project and the balance going transit improvements on the island. you will be hearing from associated right of ways later, just an update on some of the key areas that the board member's had asked about, we now have only 14 household that have not been interviewed, although two of those we have made contact with and they have simply declined to

have an interview at this time. we also have 13 households have made specific inquiries about the early payment and memorandum of understanding. six of those have actually filed for the early payment, as well as we have some other request from households that have an interest in it. they are not interested in relocating at this time. we are also evaluating requests from household where some members of the household wish to take the in loo and move off the island. and other members wish to remain on the island and anticipate preparing an amp limitation procedure that will address the situation and allow those household members that are not planning to stay for relocation housing to take an early payment. the construction

side, most of the area north of california is now under surcharge. we have about 24 feet of material over the area north of california. the stock pile that was on avenue eight has been almost the entire stock pile. if you come outcome of the mountain that we had is no longer there. the water department has also come needed isolation of waterlines at the front of the island so that we don't anticipate any more water relocation in at first sub phase area until we are connecting new waterlines a new system. with that work completes, the contractor is reconfiguring the intersection of clipper cove with treasure island road as well as clipper cove and avenue d to help facilitate movement of traffic to the front of the

island. geotechnical works, the vibratory compaction around building one is continuing. as is the process of moving debris, and isolating utilities to make way for the new wastewater treatment plant. on the design side, the sub phase 3 permit set that was submitted at the end of may, we have comment in from most of the reviewing agencies working to get the final review comments and by the end of this week so we can update the permit set and moved to our second round of review. the first final transfer map was on the board of supervisors, yesterday, and was continued to the meeting of the sixteenth for the county surveyor to reply to some pacific question regarding the map. with approval of sub phase

3 transfer map we expect to transfer some of the development parcels in the community development. we are also working with the navy to finalize the land use controls and the ability to transfer for site 24. the x dictation that the transfer will clear before the end of august. the navy work in site 12 is continuing. they have completed most of the all digs on the east side of the residential neighborhood and have moved into the last element of their current contract scope which is to excavate the remaining debris from a solid waste disposal area a portion of north point road has closed, and network should also be completed in august as part of this contract, the navy also has

demolished or removed fire damaged vacant building that was in the area west side. that concludes the report. >> any question? >> yes. as always, mr. beck thank you for the detailed report. my comment want to start by acknowledging this report by sherry william. when i showed some of our city officials, i think some of them - it shows the extent to all of these services in this neighborhood. what i'm hearing now [inaudible] what you have done is taken the time to actually feature everyone very prominently. it shows up here. when we provide information we need to make sure that everyone, it is showing up in there.

[inaudible] my question to you there are two households that have refused to be interviewed. what is the timeline? this process started a long time ago we have a consultant and we are doing outreach we still have to again satisfy some of the tenant. what is the timeline that we have? all the people we are doing outreach to and they are not responding. they need to respond. we can go beyond the call of duty and we will. what is your timeline that you need to escalate it to a certain point to say we have done all of this and they are not there. the reason i messed that is we move on, down the line, someone is going to show up and that is what we are going to hear about. you can forget about all of the outreach and going the extra mile. it will not matter. if these families that have

declined to be interviewed, all of that, that is what you're going to see. we need to anticipate that we need to present that. do you have files on them, that at some point present to the commission, you're going to have to do that. please if you could just answer those questions. >> i believe we have on the agenda today on housing update is that something that will be delivered more detail? >> >> it will be touched on as out of that. our goal is to get to 100 percent by the end of this year. ar ws is maintaining the log of all of the outreach effort and in particular to those that we are continuing to take additional measures to reach. they are continuing to document calls that are made, letters that are sent, emails and flyers that are left. we are going to continue to do that and

work through discussing additional strategies to make sure we get to 100 percent by the end of this calendar year. that is in conjunction with the larger portion of the presentation is the outreach to household that are potentially - could potentially qualify to purchase the low market rate units which is going to be a focus for the next six months to start getting people into that pipeline as well. >> the main question of the deadline i wanted to see that too. thank you. >> no other questions? next item, please? >> >> communications from and received by tida. >> any questions or comments by the board? next item please. >> ongoing business board of directors. >> hearing none, by the board. next item, please. >> one item that i failed to

mention in my directors report which was last month we had had the clipper code rules and regulations on the agenda and had been asked to continue it to this meeting. we are working with somerville to actually set the beliefs that were referred to in the rules and regulations, so that when we bring the rules and regulations back into september for approval we will be able to refer to buoys that are specifically in place area there won't be any ambiguity about what the restricted waters would be. >> thank you very much. i noticed there was a letter from the treasure island sailing center who had some questions about it. i'm glad we are doing that. >> that was the letter he submitted at the time of his testimony. >> thank you. next item, please. >> item number six, consent

agenda, all items are considered to be retained by the authority board and will be acted upon by a single vote of the authority board. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the authority board so requests in which event it should be removed from the consent agenda and considered a separate item. approving the minutes of the june 12, 2019 meeting. approving and authorizing execution of a six amendment to sublease and property management agreement between the treasure island of element authority and jon stewart company, california corporation to adopt a 2019 rent casual. resolution wrecked actively approving and authorizing execution of a third amendment to the memorandum of agreement between the treasure island of element authority and san francisco county transportation authority to compensate the authority for cost relating to yerba buena gardens, maintenance, traffic control and shuttle services to the. july one, 2019 through october 31, 2019.

>> any items on this consent agenda that the directors would like to consider? hearing none. the consent agenda is before you. can i have a motion at a second? >> moved. >> second. >> next item, please forget >> housing update. pathway to homeownership. >> karen will provide this update. >> good afternoon. thank you for having me today, and welcome director quan glad to have you on board. bob beck are leading our team to reach out to the community on treasure island that are eligible. i know we are working with data so things change and people move from the islands, we have 197 households right now that we are working with. we have directly interviewed all but six percent of them which is good. even

since we've updated bob we've had two additional people respond and interact. we are now down to 10 household that have not reached wanted it all. we are going to continue to work with them, our bigger team include - who our community outreach and engagement socialist are going to help us talk about how do you get people to read on and what else we do to engage. we would talk a bit more about that. >> what are you doing? >> in the mode of our continued engagement we did offer an open house speaker, nancy pelosi one late may. there has been a big push to get as many people out to our