essentially in three buckets. improvements that have been identified by operators to get people who are closest to the equipment and using it day in and day out. issues identified by our mechanics, as well as the issues identified by our passengers, which largely focus on deceiving design, which we have committed to providing additional forward facing seats, lowering the seat height, and increasing the opportunity to increase the onboard and health system. as we have discussed in previous meetings, those passenger enhancements will be retrofitted back into the fleet as well. i am pleased to have the opportunity to have -- to have you here from our union partners

on the vehicle. we have been working now with two generations of union leadership to improve these vehicles. and we try to address concerns and some of the improvements that we have already made. i also shared by e-mail this board and a response to a recent article that talks about white out for the cameras, and unfortunately, i believe there were several inaccuracies to that article. one of which is that the issue of glare is not unique to the l.r.p. four or the fact that we use cameras instead of mirrors. the glare is most acute at west portal, which is why 15 years ago, we actually put up a convex

mirror to provide additional availability -- visibility for our operators, which is part of how they are currently trained. [please stand by]

>> we have, as part of the costing package that we originally brought to you, we have some place holder costs for what we anticipate things to be, so something like the flat wheels, which is an issue that both operators and mechanics have been raising for a long time are already built into that overall package that we brought, and at this time, we do not anticipate that package changing significantly, but there's still a lot of work to do as we get to those final

estimates. so that's essentially where we are today. i know you had a long meeting, so i won't -- i won't go into too much more detail. i am committed to continuing these conversations. i know there's not an august meeting, but we will be back in september and i'm very hopeful that we'll start to see some strong traction on those 90-day goals and really start to seeing these vehicles get to where we need them to be. >> chair peskin: thank you for your candor, the good news, the not-so-good news, but really appreciate your constant updates to the sfcta. are there any questions to miss kirschbaum from members? supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: yes. thank you, miss kirschbaum, the

flat wheels, i didn't see anything in your presentation, but that was the real reason that i wanted to have this presentation. what we learned from previous presentations is there's the way you all are training or have asked the operators to operate these vehicles is to hit the emergency mushroom versus using the manual break. the mushroom worked well, i think on the older brada -- is that how you say it? >> brada. >> supervisor safai: i heard a life span of 100,000 miles versus 120,000. i know it is a mechanism that you just talked about. you'd have to ask the contractor, siemens to retrofit and change. what's the cost of that overall

to the entire system to fix that defect that was not known before purchase? >> it's about 30,000 per vehicle and about $5 million to $6 million total. >> supervisor safai: so is that something you'll have to come back for approval or is that something you're asking the t.a. for? >> it's build into the package and prop k is one of the several funding sources that will go to address the overall replacement costs of these two. >> supervisor safai: so this was something that you would say based on the training of the operators because of what i heard you say about the whole emergency situations that people are safe, you taught them to hit the mushroom, and that's something that you've continued with the new system, the siemens?

>> to clarify, we put a strong focus on using the mushroom on the brada vehicles. it was a campaign that took place a couple years ago, and it was based on some very serious safety issues, when we provided operators with familiarization on the new vehicle, we did highlight that you can get to the emergency break from the t-stick, but many operators use that muscle memory and use that mushroom break when they have to make a life-or-death decision. so we think that is a reality of operating two fleets at the same time. we will be continuing to operate a mixed fleet for the next four to six years, and

during that time, we'll want to make sure to have as high a vehicle availability as possible. >> supervisor safai: so for you, it was a safety issue. that was why you didn't update the training and you encouraged the operators to use the mushroom. is that what you're saying? >> we have made a strong investment in operators using the emergency button on the brada, which is the safest course of action. that same muscle memory they're using when they use the l.r.v.-4's. we're not training them that way on the l.r.v.-4's, but that's what they do on the brada training. >> supervisor safai: so you're

not encouraging them to use the mushroom on the brada? >> we are not. >> supervisor safai: so you're going to ask the $5 million to fix this? >> yes. >> supervisor safai: so can we ask why that wasn't anticipated when you purchased the new vehicles because they're, what, $3 million or $3.5 million a vehicle? >> thank you for that question. it is something that we learned along the way. so one of the things that we don't -- that we have learned with the l.r.v.-4's is the frequency of which operators are encountering these types of emergency situations where they

need to use that. i think we underestimated the impact of operating two fleets, and that operators would need to maintain all of their brada skills while also adapting to the new vehicle. >> supervisor safai: and how much does this -- so you have to make a $6 million -- you're going to ask for a $6 million investment to change the brand-new vehicles that you just bought to accommodate this training. but before you do that, how much does it cost -- i understand you get flat wheels. what is it costing you for the system with that manner of

using the emergency break rather than using a t-stick? >> it's having two types of impacts. the first is that we have several vehicles that have had their wheels flattened too many times, and the entire wheel system needs to be replaced. >> supervisor safai: and what's the cost of that? [inaudible] >> -- so there's a customer impact such as crowding on our busy routes.

>> supervisor safai: i mean, i guess, again, i just -- i know that -- again, i'm not accusing you. you just came into the position, but it makes no sense to me that we spend millions and millions of dollars on new vehicles, and we didn't anticipate vehicle replacements, we didn't anticipate training hours, we didn't anticipate trains being offline because we have one manner in which we've been training people to use one train, and that doesn't translate into the new train system. so it's not really a $6 million increase, it's significantly more than that from missing the opportunity to understand -- and again, this is not my area of expertise, this is your department's area of expertise, but it seems as though when you would be purchasing a vehicle, you would also understand or work with the operators to understand where they are in terms of the tool or the machine that they're going to use to make this system effective. so again, i just asked the question.

why didn't that happen? why were they not brought into the conversation to try to anticipate this stuff? because you know, trains not being out the door means there's not trains -- and means there's a decrease in service in the system which decreases delays and frustration all over the city. it's very much what we as member of the t.a. and supervisors hear most frequently about the m.t.a. there's not justienough vehicl the road. you seem to have went through a process of negotiation, and that went well, and now, we're going to hire more operators, but it seems like this neverending cycle that, no pun intended, mushroom into these large issues for the agency. >> i think we share a common goal of trying to deliver

excellent service for our customers and adjust problems as we see them, so i understand your attempt to i sign blame, and i apologize -- assign blame, and i apologize that i may not have the best understanding up to this point, but we are committed to our partners and moving forward on what is the best solution to this issue, which is putting additional track breaks on the vehicle. the testing of the brakes has been going smoothly. we anticipate in the next month or two, we'll be bringing it to the cpuc which is our safety and regulatory body and move from there. and i'm happy to answer any other questions. >> supervisor safai: i actually would like to hear from the operators to hear some of the

insight that they have and as it pertains to some of the particular issues that they have with the old and new l.r.v.'s. >> earlier everybody was talking to safety, and safety pertaining to traffic, safety pertaining to pedestrians. i'd like to talk about one word, blame, b-l-a-m-e. if and when these new l.r.v.-4's, i'd like to ask you to please not blame the operators for manufacturing defects. operators asked for a rearview mirror to be able to see in the back of their cab. there's a rearview mirror that doesn't see anything, can't see anything. operators asked for mirrors on

the side of their trains so they could hopefully prevent people from being dragged under the trains as we've seen in the past couple of months, little old ladies and senior citizens. two virtually identical situations of senior citizens being dragged under trains due to faulty doors. very similar situations, however, the people that get blamed with it are the operators. i brought with me ramon galderamez, and he's more of an expert than i am. i only drove the p.c.c.s, and he drove the light rail, so he has a much more understanding of the defects related to the bradas, the l.r.v.-4's.

however, i want everybody to take that word, b-l-a-m-e. it's not the operator's fault that they have a monitor approximately this size right here inside their vehicle in which they're supposed to look 150, 160 feet back. and on top of that, their monitor whites out, as we've seen through the reporting that's been done on the -- some news stations. so please, let's just take that word into consideration and try and shift that blame, that focus. with that in mind, i'd like to bring up ramon galdamez. >> good morning, commissioners. i'm ramon galdamez. i've been with the department 18 years. the light rail operators are deeply concerned about the

safety mechanism in place on the lrv-4's. they are concerned with the lrv-4 not stopping in a timely manner. as you all know, the lrv-4 has many issues, including a safety efficiency. something needs to be done. we are being instructed to apply this. proper planning appropriates poor performance. they should have come to this. actually, i may know more about this equipment than i know about my wife. i spend 10, 12 hours on a daily basis. we are responsible for this equipment. as i stand before you, i am asking you to reconsider before we let this unat ttamed lion o

dinosaur into the street. with that said, i will please implore you. i have had numbers of conversations and discussions with m.t.a. team, and it seems like to be they are going down the tube. they are reluctant to do something about it because the trains are here, and we realize that being here means they're going to force for us to adjust and to accommodate ourselves rather than saying we have something here that is something here that we have to deal with but it's something that's not being built. thank you. >> supervisor safai: thank you, gentlemen. i'm happy to have someone else ask questions. but what i heard loud and clear, it doesn't sound like there was a lot of consultation with the operators when purchasing this. i guess, miss kirschbaum, if you could come back up, i have

a couple questions. all those contracts with siemens -- are all the lrv's purchased and are we stuck with siemens going forward, or is this the only option that you all are committed to? >> i believe that addressing the design issues that we're facing with the current vehicle is our best option the alternative would be to start from scratch and replace the bradas on a much slower time frame. it's anticipated that the first vehicles would arrive six years from now, and until then, we

would continue to operate them as best we could, which would not be very good for at least ten years. and it's also very unlikely that the next vehicle that we purchased would not be -- -- it would likely be more expensive. >> supervisor safai: one of the things that i heard you say yesterday that was positive was that now that you have discovered this issue with the breaking mechanism going forward, the new siemens vehicles will be retrofitted, and you won't have all the mechanic hours and replacement -- is that correct? >> yes. >> supervisor safai: so because we've anticipated this short coming, we can go forward. what about some of the other things that you heard? rearview mirrors, monitors being so small that they white

out? have you heard these concerns from the operators? >> yes, and that was the intent of my slide six was to talk about the improvements that we've made, the improvements that we have finalized the design on, and the improvements that we are working closely to finalize, including replacing the monitoring to a ten-inch screen. >> supervisor safai: but i don't see mirrors on that. >> the mirror that ramon was commenting on was considered, but we are not planning ongoing to an exterior mirror. we believe that the monitors offer enhanced visibility. >> supervisor safai: i know that commissioner walton wanted

to ask some questions through the chair. >> commissioner walton? >> supervisor walton: i think you asked the questions i had. >> supervisor safai: having worked with organizatied laborr almost a decade, that was often missed. when we're crafting legislation and policies, we're not thinking about people that are actually doing the work and on the front lines, and i think it causes these types of mishaps, and in our situation, it's costing millions and millions of dollars and could have been anticipated better, for sure, including some of the people that actually do the work. mirrors, monitors, but training in terms of braking 'seems to e

a very obvious thing. mr. marenco, did you have something else that you wanted to add? >> well, i just wanted to say that our communication is impro improving, and with the help of ramon, the agency has been addressing them, so we are in the process of remedying as many safety issues as we possibly can. it's just unfortunately it's just somewhat time-consuming. we're not against bringing in any time of new vehicle because we're all with the hopes of improving our overall general lifestyle in transportation and just improving. however, what it is that we're operating has to be in a safe manner, it has to be done in a

safe manner, so we are definitely in the process of trying to fix whatever little quirks or safety issues that arise. >> supervisor safai: thank you. and i'll just say, having been a commissioner here for 2.5 years, this is the first time that we've actually had someone from organized labor come in to the sfmta. so i would say particularly when it comes to light rails or any other operation in terms of mechanics or decisions that are being made, i would encourage the transportation authority and the leadership of the sfmta to have that conversation up front. we want to invite you back on a more frequent basis so you can be part of these conversations up front so that you're not an afterthought and we're not spending millions of dollars to correct something that you and your operators could have anticipated very easily. so thank you for taking the

time and sitting here with us. thank you, mr. chair, and thank you, miss kirschbaum. >> chair mandelman: we do have some public comment. >> hi, everyone. thank you for a very interesting meeting today. and i also want to thank julie for your report that changes are being made, so i appreciate that. i just want to say one little thing about the operator situation. he feels very concerned about being blinded by the cameras, and he would like the rearview mirrors back. there's a strong vote for mirrors. okay. so now, i want to address another issue of health and

safety, which is the number of passenger seats. and i want to first say that i was in a hard stop in the tunnel at 36 miles an hour and it was only the seats that stopped our motion. i am concerned about sudden braking in these open cars, and i am worried that people will get thrown about and hurt. since i was also injured sitting sw sitting sideways in the new cars, i interviewed last fall the muni riders and found out that half liked the new cars and half didn't. it was the same 50% that the 2014 survey that the muni got. they didn't like the trains where they wanted to sit, so at least seats are coming back, which is good. oh, 30 seconds, okay. i'm very concerned, a lot of people are getting injured

sitting sideways, and i interviewed 400 more in march. they told me think have sciatica, they have scoliosis, they have pregnancy, back problems, motion sickness, a rod in the back. i have lyme disease. my joints are unstable. we need the forward seat does back, and -- seats back, and i'm also concerned about the double number. i would like to see forward seats as part of a health and safety design in these new cars. >> supervisor mandelman: next speaker. >> vice chair mandelman, this is a very important issue as i ride the subway often.

i'm paying for this in two ways. i tap my clipper® card, and then, 1% out of every sales tax pays for that, so i've got some standing here. safety above all -- and this is very complex work. i read that the new york city subway, which i'm sure some of you have been on. if not, i encourage you to try it. has 16 different types of vehicle in active service, some of which go back to 1964, so i would like to see how they manage slotting employees into 16 different types of vehicles. we have to work on our mean distance between failures. i'm seeing as 5,000, 6,000 miles between failures.

that's the range of the new york city subways back in the days of the graffiti, and the broken lights and all of that. they worked through that, but they still have issues that they have to solve. i mention to you as a person of disabilities, that sideways seats are very important to me. i ask that you not totally eliminate the sideways facing seats. some sideways facing seats must be preserved in these vehicles. i'm not saying it has to be one or the other. there must be a reasonable mix. i do not have to explain to you my reasons for my disabilities, but please do not eliminate the sideways facing seats, and remember, safety above all. thank you. >> supervisor mandelman: thank you. are there any other members of the public who would like to speak before i close public comment? >> good afternoon, edward mason. i'm really disappointed that this is a 30-year decision and

consequently to me, it's a 30-year disappointment. the flat wheels is continuing. when i came down today at 24th and church on a grade, the vehicle seemed to have the wheels spin before it would engage and get traction. the acceleration is slow, and also, the door opening and closing is slow, so that's probably going to impact reliability of the system overall. we still have chatter and jerky stops at 18 and church periodically. it's not consistent, but it's still in existence. so my only comment is it is what it is, unfortunately, and the seating arrangement, you know, should go to more transfer seats and also blue seats. and on the -- in the slide,

there was announcement improvement. we do not have daytime on the new siemens cars, we do a date time on the brada cars, and i can't believe that we're not having that feature on the siemens cars. thank you. >> supervisor mandelman: thank you. is there any other members of the public who want to speak on this item? seeing none, public comment is now closed. mr. clerk, please call the next item. [agenda item read]. >> supervisor mandelman: colleagues, are there any new items? seeing -- well, is there any public comment on this item? seeing none. [gavel]. >> supervisor mandelman: mr. clerk, please call the next item. >> clerk: item 18, general public comment.

>> supervisor mandelman: we have two speakers, and anyone else who wants to address us during general public comment please lineup at the right of the room. >> next wednesday, july 31, will conclude five years since the corporate commuter bus program was initiated on friday, august 1, 2014. there have been 4,248 placards issued to buses and currently based on a public records request, there are 711 buses operating in san francisco. these are -- plus the scoff law buses that don't have a sticker on them as they blend into the armada. trying to get a public records request, and these records are incomplete. but there have been over 2100 complaints registered, and i received the list for 157

pages, but that is not inclusive of the entire five-year period. administrative penalties through december of '17 have amounted to $1,011,058. citations ending in january '18 were 5,038 citations issued for over $708,000. we now have over 200 buses on 24 street, up from 160 buses last report. so my question is in the preliminary plan of 2050 that's being prepared by the m.t.c., there's no solution for removing these buses off of 24 street or from the city as a

whole. so i think we're just getting inundated with these inner city buses over our neighborhood. thank you very much. >> supervisor mandelman: thank you. next speaker. >> vice chair mandelman, i love a public meeting. i can't seem to get enough of them. i hope to be back with you all again, and i feel that this agency should have a regional perspective on things. i don't want us to be us versus them because we are all san francisco. even though i do not sleep in san francisco, i'm here with you now. i am san francisco today, and i look forward to being san francisco tomorrow. and so i come to you as a passionate and unapologetic

user of diverse means of mobility. i ride muni. i think it's important that we focus on traffic enforcement for both vehicles and also two-wheeled conveyances and traffic enforcement because i want to be safe out there if i'm driving a car -- of which i do have a nevada driver's license in good standing or riding a bike or scooter or walking or riding in a public

transit conveyance. we must have good traffic enforcement, robust traffic enforcement to hold people accountable to traffic law. just as i follow vehicle traffic law, i expect everybody to do the same and manage our speed so we can all operate in harmony on the streets of san francisco. thank you. >> supervisor mandelman: thank you. are there any other members of the public who would like to speak in public comment today? seeing none, public comment is closed. mr. clerk, do we have any other items before us today? >> clerk: item 19, adjournment. >> supervisor mandelman: great. then we are adjourned.

. >> the hon. london breed: almost. good morning, everyone. i'm london breed, mayor of san francisco, and i'm so excited to be here today with so many amazing people to talk about something that's so important. just this past week, we had a big event celebrating a $600 million affordable housing bond that will go on the ballot this november. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: and i want to thank the board of supervisors for passing that unanimously, and i want to say that there's something in there for everyone, for our low-income families and seniors, to our middle-income residents, to our teachers. we know that housing affordability is critical to the success of our city, and i'm grateful to the board of

supervisors for passing that ballot measure, and i am hopeful with fingers crossed that the voters will support that, and we are putting forward that housing bond without raising property taxes again, so i just want to say that over and over and over again. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: so today, we have another opportunity. today, we are signing the legislation to put a $628 million bond on the ballot to help with our emergency facilities all over san francisco, and we are also doing that without raising property taxes. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: the goal is to put this on the march ballot, and so we're going to have to work hard to get voters to approve this one, as well. i just want to start by that i

thinking naomi kelly, and the work of the capital planning committee. because of the work of the capital planning committee over the years, we've been able to have a very well-thought-out plan for investing dollars in facilities that the city owns, especially our public safety facilities. and in 2010 and in 2014, voters passed these bonds without raising property taxes but with almost 80% of the vote to support rehabilitating facilities all over san francisco. and just this year, i was really excited about cutting the ribbon on station 5, which is my home station, where i used to get my toys as a firefighter. our firefighters and our police officers, fixing our buildings

and making sure that they can sustain an earthquake is so critical to protecting the lives of our citizens. in fact we are all reminded from last week, the major earthquake that happened in southern california and the devastating impact it had on that community, we are reminded that we have to be prepared. it's not about if, it's about when a disaster strikes. so what are we going to do to make sure that our public safety personnel can focus on the work that they need to do to save lives and not necessarily the challenge that exist with the buildings that house them and what could happen to people that we need to shelter in a disaster. kezar pavilion is not seismically safe.

it is one of the facilities that could qualify for additional revenues so that if necessary, we can use that as a shelter facility in case a disaster hits. we have to be thinking ahead in not only repairing the buildings that we know need to be repaired, like park station, which is currently undergoing some renovations like police and fire stations and public safety buildings, and 911 buildings where we send our dispatchers, all of these places matter, so when a disaster hits, their only focus is on saving lives of the citizens of san francisco and not worrying about the condition of their buildings and whether or not they're in a bad place themselves. so today, we are announcing a $628 million public safety beyond for earthquake safety and emergency response for the march ballot, as i said.

and i am just so excited and so proud of the work that we did collaborating with the board, collaborating with the capital planning committee to do this in such an incredibly responsible way. and i just want to thank all of you for being here, joining us, because this is exciting for the future of san francisco. we know that there are challenges in our city, and we have to make the right kind of investments, not only the issues that we face today but for the issues we'll face tomorrow. this is just taking one step further to doing just that, and so i'm really excited to be here with so many incredible people, including the supervisor who represents district 5 -- [applause] >> the hon. london breed: many of you all know vallie brown. she's been a community advocate

in this district for so many years. not only does she spend time cleaning it up, i mean, personally, literally in the morning, picking up track with her own picker, but she also spends a lot of time fighting for resources in this community. whether it's our public safety locations or our community locations, she's been a real advocate, and some of you know the work that was done here, also, the track that was repurposed. and commissioner buell, what was the location over here by the triangle? what is that called? yeah, with public and private dollars, we're transforming this area. and when i served as supervisor, the person who was really actively engaged in working with the community and helping to bring together public and private resources to get these projects done for this community was no other

than your current supervisor for district 5, vallie brown. [applause] >> supervisor brown: thank you, mayor breed. i'm really happy to be standing here today and to be talking about this. just a few months ago, we were at fire station 5, brand-new opened. not only is it absolutely state-of-the-art and beautiful, but it is going to be a hub if anything happens in this city. and when i think about we have so many other stations and buildings that we need to have this kind of bond money to be able to fix them up so if we do have earthquakes, if we have things that happen in this city, that we're prepared. when we look at -- i know that mayor breed was talking about kezar and other places, but when we have a major earthquake, and if we think about the earthquake that just

happened in southern california, and how strong it was, but it was in the desert. but think about what if it was here, and what it could have done to our city. i think about that every day, and what i would do if my place was flattened in the city. i probably would be camping in the park unless i had someplace to go that was safe, right? i would. i know the no-tent rule, but i think they have a cot there for me. i asked them, can you put a cot? so i just feel that it's so important that not only is this city ready for anything that could happen, unfortunately -- and we know it will someday, but we have to be ready individually. we have a responsibility. i actually just went to a fire in my district a few weeks ago. everybody ran out of the building.

there were, like, 12 people. the things they forgot when they ran out -- they forgot their i.d., they forgot their medicine, all of those things, and it keeps going into my mind, am i ready? am i ready for an earthquake? am i ready for a fire or anything -- any other kind of emergency? so i went home, and i remembered an emergency kit that i had put together probably 12, 15 years ago, when i did nert, and nert was first starting. my water was expired, the batteries expired, the food expired. i'm like, i'm not ready, and i didn't have the emergency little pack that you're supposed to have by your door to grab and run if something happens. i wasn't ready, and i think about that because i think about what about my neighbor that's elderly, and she has a hard time getting down the stairs? we should be going out, talking to our neighbors.

we should be going out, training with nert. please sign up. if you're not a member, it's kind of fun. we need to start thinking about our neighbors and what we can do individually. are you signed up for the alert, emergency alert, everyone on your phone? your neighbor? this is the kind of thing that we need to do because it really takes us as an individual and our neighbors to really protect each other if this happens. and believe me if we have an earthquake, i'm heading down to cafe revelry, and if his coffee machine is working because these are the places we're going to have to go to see, are they left behind? do they need help? i say that because i appreciate all the work in this city that everyone does. our police chief, fire chief,

naomi kelly, and especially our mayor to say we need to look at this, we need to do this now, and being so creative for doing this. i want to thank everyone for coming to district 5. it's nice and foggy here, but cool you down a little bit before you go back to your job. so thank you, everyone. and the next speaker -- are you going to bring him up? all right. thank you. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: thank you, supervisor brown. and just a reminder, anyone can go to sf72.org if you want to get prepared for any emergency situation in san francisco. a lot of great information from emergency management. sf72.org. now i want to introduce someone

who's ae be who's been a 25-year veteran of the san francisco fire department and has a very thorough knowledge of how to deal with emergency situations and is why she is currently serving as the chief of the department. please welcome jeanine nicholson. >> good morning, everyone. i love our san francisco summer weather. speaking of nert, as supervisor brown just mentioned, i want to recognize, we do have some nert volunteers right here, and nert is going to be critical in the event -- [applaus [applause] >> in the event >> -- in the event of a disaster. we know it's not if, it's when. i want to recognize mohamed nuru. he's been a great ally for us

and working with us. in the event of a disaster, our fire department needs to respond immediately. our firefighters and e.m.s. workers work 24-7, 365, and we need to be able to respond immediately. and this bill will provide the funding that we need to invest in our public safety infrastructure so we can continue to bring the city and the citizens the best service that we possibly can, but especially during a disaster. so thank you all for being here today. good day. [applause] >> the hon. london breed: all right. our last speaker for this program before we finally sign this legislation is the chief of the police department, bill scott. [applaus

[applause] >> thank you, mayor. i'll be brief. i just want to reiterate what the mayor said. we have 13 san francisco police departments and 14 other buildings. many of our stations are over 25 years old. these stations, from the day that the doors open, they are open 24-7. they have always been in use, and many of them are in need of seismic improvements, significant seismic improvements. and we don't want -- in the time of an emergency, we don't want to have to worry about whether or not the station is going to be standing, even though we plan for that if it happens. that's the last thing we want to worry about, so i, too, want to thank you all for being here. the vision of the mayor, city administrator kelly, and the vision of our city for looking forward so our city has the proper infrastructure to

respond properly, so thank you for the leadership, and thank you, mayor. >> the hon. london breed: thank you. and again, i want to thank all of you for being here. again, this is only the beginning. the real work beginning when we have to -- begins when we have to campaign to get this ballot measure passed. we have been successful in 2010 and 2014 in getting almost 80% of the support of the voters for a previous eser bond, and i want to make sure that we top that, so i'm going to need your help. it's incredibly important that we shrine a light on the measure that will be going on the march 2020 ballot for voters to support. i appreciate you all being here, and also don't forget to vote for the housing bond on the ballot this november. all right. let's get this signed. [applause]

>> the hon. london breed: 7, 11, 19, done. [applause]

>> the renovation of balboa park, the oldest in the city of san francisco, and now it is the newest part in the city of san francisco.

through our partnership, and because of public investment from the two thousand eight fund, we are celebrating a renewal and an awakening of this park. we have it safer, happier, more joyous. >> 3, 2, 1, [laughter] =--[applause] >> it is a great resource for families, to have fun in the city, recreation. >> this is an amazing park. we have not revitalized it without public and private investment. the critical piece of the process of this renovation was

that it was all about the community. we reached out to everyone in this community. we love this park dearly and they all had thoughts and ideas and they wanted to bring their own creativity and their personality to bear on the design. what you see is what the community wanted. these ideas all came from the residents of this community. as a result, there is a sense of ownership, pride and responsibility that goes along with what is going to be an exciting park.