aying doctor. and i told the police investigators that i would not be able to predict if she is going to be a serial sexual predator but i don't have any doubt i was not the first person she played doctor with and i will not be the last. when you wake up at 5:30 in the morning and there's a registered nurse there registered nurses or any of the others are not allowed to practice anything on patients unless it's in the written plan, unless an emergency comes up. and the written plan was that sent me a tablet from gynecology which in the daytime a nurse gave me, had nothing to do with 5:30 in the morning. in her mind she made a connection that it came from gynecology there must be information, i'm going to begin the pelvic examination. so i wake up with this woman suddenly pulls off my clothes

didn't take time to turn on the light or put on gloves even, sticks her hands in my pubic area and rubs back and forth. of course there was nothing to observe. she didn't even acknowledge my existence as a person. they are all required to tell you what they are planning to do. i could have been a mannequin. but she talked to herself. she said, i don't see anything. because that's what she was there for she came for this examination. she couldn't see why she didn't see this thing she made up in her mind and when i suddenly shouted at her, what are you doing, she said medication. so that was the thing that set her off. and we all know what happens when there are nurses who engage in their own practices. there was one who was caught after 300 deaths many are never caught. there must be many people who become ill or die because of people like this running around. and until that nurse and the administrate

administerrer at the jewish home are out of the field i will never give up on this subject. >> is this something is department is aware of? i would invite you to speak with a representative from sfpd. >> we'll follow up. i'm not aware of that case, but we will follow up. >> thank you. >> have a good evening ma'am. >> good evening commissioners. my name is brian with the public defender's office. dpa published its 2018 annual report last week. 275 days late. the data report was confusing. since i have a few minutes to speak i'm going to highlight three points. first they report that 59 percent of

sustained cases nine month internal completion goal but 293 percent improvement over the previous year. i did the math. the math suggests that just 15 percent of cases met that goal. i realize the goal was just a benchmark. both the percentages receive a failing grade in any school. an increase sounds impressive but sounds absurd under scrutiny. they said the public filed one misconduct allegation. of those officers 85 percent had more than one allegation. actual numbers instead of percentages which are the more vivid story. that story is this. nearly 600 had more than one allegation in a single year, over 200 had one nearly every other month and 55 had one almost every month. the way they present the data matters and here they present data in a way that obscures what's happening and that's imbalance. finally, dpa claims in appendix a the chief lowered the

punishment in nine cases. i went through the cases and identified how often the chief lowered the discipline from a written reprimand to no punishment. i found at least 60 instances when it happened. i don't know how this represents the number of nine. that undermining the credibility of the report. so mathematical mistakes are one thing misrepresenting the truth is another. so i'm looking forward to next week's presentation. we can dive into statistics a bit more. thank you. >> thank you. >> any other public comment? general public comment? >> good evening ms. brown. >> yes, good evening everyone. i would like to use the overhead. i'm a little tired today. as usual i always come

here to talk about my son who was murdered august 14, 2006 and to this day his case is a cold case and is unsolved. and i bring these with me all the time. thomas hannibal, paris moffet, jason thompson, anthony hunger and marcus hunger. these are the people that were there when my son was being shot. and these are the perpetrators. one of them is deceased. and i ask for the last 14 years, i've been bringing these names here. and i just didn't pull them out of a hat. they are down at 8:50 in the homicide detail on the fifth floor with these names there

and my son's case. and i'm still asking why haven't any of these names and these people been arrested. i know people are saying we need someone to come forward. but how long and when? is there anything else you can do beside waiting for someone else to come forward? there's a $250,000 reward. take that money and investigate this case. i know you hired a new investigator for me. but nothing has happened. i'm still in the dark. i come all the time, i bring all these other faces with me. and i stand with some of these mothers for unsolved homicides. and that's my quest is

unsolved homicides. because my son's case is not solved. and i do ask where was everybody when my son and these other victims were murdered. i bring these pictures with me all the time because i want people to see what i have to deal with for the rest of my life and what i have to remember of my son for the rest of my life. and it hurts. and it still hurts. i continue to go to every form that i think i can go to where officials are there so that my son's face and memory wouldn't be forgotten. and people that are trying to be reelected into office and they are talking about public safety and people being murdered every day need to stop solve these cases so that i can heal. >> thank you. there is a $250,000

reward out there for information, i think leading to the arrest and conviction. 415-57-5444 is the tip line. any other public comment? . >> good evening everyone. my name is danielle harris. i'm the director of public policy for san francisco public defender's office. i'm here again to ask this commission to take a formal and hard look at dpa's ability and commitment to fulfill their mission, which which as far as i can tell, is laid out in the charter. and it has been affirmed by the electorate over 80 percent to hold police accountable. as i told you at the last commission meeting the current rate of records released by dpa at that rate,

it will take a quarter century for all the records to be released on just the current sworn sfpd. that in itself is unacceptable. then we have strategic plans presented tonight which nowhere acknowledged that holding police accountable is the reason dpa exists. i heard discussion about refining our mission and defining our mission. it is not up to dpa to define their mission. their mission is defined very clearly in the city charter. and it can't be in name only. the only place that i see the words police accountability appear in those strategic plans are in the name of the agency. that is a problem. and then we heard from him that the annual report is inaccurate, misleading, unreliable

and gives itself even a failing grade. the idea that these two reports, the strategic plans leave out these essential legally required tasks like two-year audits and 1421 while they are refining and defining their mission says it all. they need to refocus. they need to reorganize. if these things weren't concerning enough, let me tell you something, what happened yesterday. as you may know, we have an open request to dpa for all 1421 records. and as individual cases arise we make specific requests. i would like to -- i have copies of these two letters we got yesterday for everybody.

we first got a letter yesterday in a specific case stating that sergeant daniel silver from the dpa has no records under 1421. much to our surprise, the same afternoon. >> all right i'm sorry your time is up. we will take the letters. just let us have the documents and we will have them distributed. >> [off mic]. >> i don't actually, but we'll get them. okay. thank you. next speaker. >> good evening commissioners. my name is rebecca young. i'm a deputy public defender for the last 17 years in the city and county of san francisco. i co-chair the racial justice committee. this is the first time i'm appearing in front of this newly-formed police commission, and i'm very

happy to see all the new faces. because i work very closely with danielle harris i would like to finish her comments which is that on the same day that we received a letter from dpa saying no record on officer silver, we also received a letter from dpa saying that officer silver has reportable records under sb1421. and the records involved an officer-involved shooting. and so it becomes something that cries out for explanation. how is it that on the very same day dpa can send out two completely different letters on the same officer one saying absolutely no record, and the other one saying records of an officer-involved shooting. so the first letter says there are no records that qualify under penal code section 832.7. this requires

an explanation. and i am hopeful because the commission has oversight over dpa that the commission is as concerned about this 180 response on the same officer on the same issue as the public defender's office is. having said that, i listen very carefully tonight to ms. hawkins presentation, which was excellent, i agree with commissioner mazzucco on that. and i listened carefully to commissioner henderson's report. and i heard a couple of things which would give me some pause. and one is there is new program and not all the cases have been run through the program. and the old data has not been integrated with the new data and there's brand new attorneys there and brand new investigators. and basically we are in a huge learning curve with dpa. that's

fine. that should be understood by everybody including the public defender's office. however, i want, and i would expect the commission to set a deadline and its own expectations for how the dpa responds to records under sb1421. sb1421 is essentially an accountability by the state of california. all departments must comply. and we've met with nothing but resistance. thank you for listening. >> can i give public comment on the bicycle reign issue? >> you have eight seconds. >> as a resident of the bayview i am really, and as a person that needs a lot more exercise. >> your time is up. all right. thank you. any other public comment? okay. public comment is closed. next item please. >> line item 3 adjournment action

item. >> is there a motion? we have no closed session i take it? is there a motion to adjourn? >> so moved. >> is there public comment on the motion to adjourn? no public comment. all in favor? >> aye. >> opposed? all right. motion carries. we had four votes in favor. [end of meeting]

. >> good morning everyone. this is october 9 2019 regular meeting of the budget and finance committee. our clerk is ms. linda wong. i would like to thank those from s.f. gov tv for broadcasting. can we excuse supervisor fewer.

please make sure to silence all cellphones and electronic devices. completed copies of any documents to be included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. items will appear on the next minutes. >> can you please call item number 1. >> clerk: lease amendment - lexington lion san francisco, lp - 350 rhode island street-north - $2,600,000 rent credit. >> i would like to make a motion petitioner this to be continued for one more week. before that i will take public comment. are there any members of the public who would like to comment on item 1, seeing none that item is closed. i would like to make a motion to continue the item to october 16.

>> clerk: item 2 is resolution retroactively authorizing the department of public health, behavioral health services to enter into a multi-year organized delivery system intergovernmental agreement for substance use disorder services with the state department of health care services, in the amount of $171,714,918 for the term of july 1, 2019, through june 30, 2022 . >> thank you. >> i have been working on this contract for about 27 years. >> please continue. >> the first thing i want to point out is that the contract is retroactive. the source of the retroactivity was we first received the agreement for our perusal on

october 20. there are changes in the funding since the crime prevention public safety act of 2011. it involves them work through centers of medicare and medicaid services. our services get back and forth before signed so it's not unusual that they're slow. >> okay. >> having said that not guilty 1922 all of the amendments to this will be retroactive to july 1st. so they'll all be retroactive contracts. anyway, this contract is practically the same as it was last year. the big changes came two years before. it's really a pretty straightforward contract. basically what it is is the

rules and regulations and procedures for bill ging -- if one successfully follows those rules, you get paid whatever your legitimate costs were. so it's delightfully straightforward. >> okay. colleagues any comments or questions? >> good morning. the board is being asked to approve a grant agreement from the state department of healthcare services for substance use disorder services. this is $171,000,000 grant. the city would be reimbursed by the state. the amount in each year is shown on table 1 of $57.2 million. i think you probably know historically in each year of the

grant is the state budget changes. they do come back for an amendment so the second and third-year amount could potentially change from the amount in this agreement. we recommend approval. >> thank you very much. any members of the public like to comment? seeing none public comment is closed. this is moved to the board with a positive recommendation. madam clerk, can you please call item number 3. >> clerk: resolution retroactively authorizing the office of the treasurer & tax collector to accept and expend a grant in the amount of $962,892 from the california student aid commission every kid counts college savings program for the office of financial empowerment kindergarten to college program for conducting outreach to families and provide incentives for families to contribute to college savings accounts for the period of may 1, 2019, through june 30, 2021.

>> again eric mankey with the office of the treasure and tax collector. i'm here to seek an approval for our office to spend $926,000 for the california student aid commission. this funding will go to support the kindergarten to college program. just as a way of background, this was started in 2011 based on research that shows kids with college savings for up to seven times more likely to attend college if they have a college savings account. since 2011 kindergarten to college has automatically opened more than 42,000 accounts for students when they begin kindergarten. including we just opened 11,000 new accounts this year. the city and county provides $50 as an initial deposit into that account and we use private

funds to incentivize families to further save. the incentives work. since the inception of kindergarten to college, families have saved $4.6 million into those accounts. if you include the city funding we have a total of $7 million in those accounts. what this grant will do is allow us to continue to do outreach and continue those incentives. as you see, we are seeking retroactive approval. this is because being a state grant we didn't receive the information and the grant approval from the state until the end of may as the budget was closing. so we decided to hold off since we couldn't get it in our budget submission for 2019 and 2020. >> thank you very much. let's open up for public comment. any members of the public like to comment on item 3? seeing none, public comment is

closed. colleagues, any comments or questions? seeing none we will move in to the board without objection. >> clerk: item 4 resolution retroactively authorizing the department of public health to accept and expend a grant in the total amount of $2,300,400 from the california department of state hospitals to participate in a program, entitled “pre-trial felony mental health diversion,” for the three-year budget period of september 15, 2019, through september 14, 2022. >> thank you very much. >> good morning supervisors. as is also stated we are requesting the ability to accept and spend a three-year grant from september 14 2022 from the department of state hospitals that would fund services for those who qualify for mental health diversion. this is a pre-trial diversion program for those competent to

stand trial on felony charges who also have a mental illness. this grant would fund intensive case management services as well as funding for stabilization rooms and a behavioural health clinician that would work in the jails to support evaluation for the courts to admit people into the program as well as expeditiously making refers into treatment. of course i'm happy to answer any questions that you may have. >> seeing no comments or questions there is no b.l.a. report on this. are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item 4, seeing none public comment is closed. i would like to make a motion to move this to the board with a positive recommendation. taken without objection. thank you very much. >> clerk: item number 5 resolution declaring the intent of the city and county of san

francisco (“city”) to reimburse certain expenditures from proceeds of future bonded indebtedness; authorizing the director of the mayor's office of housing and community development (“director”) to submit an application and related documents to the california debt limit allocation committee (“cdlac”) to permit the issuance of residential mortgage revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $56,700,000 for 410 china basin street >> i am a senior project manager with the mayor's office of housing and community development. the resolution before you will authorize an application for bond proceeds to pay for the construction and related development costs for mission bay block south 9 and to approve the hearing that the city conducted already to comply with the federal tax equity and financial responsibility act. this project is located within the mission bay south redevelopment plan area and it's administered by the office of community investment and infrastructure. the block 9 team is comprised of bridge housing and community

housing partnership who have formed a limited partnership. the project will provide 141 units including a manager's unit of affordable rental housing for formerly households. units will be all studios and a portion of the studio units will be sized to accommodate in-home care support and medical equipment. the project will receive operating support through the local subsidy program. the building includes a large courtyard and adjacent community room lounge closed bicycle parking. the project also includes a community garden that will be operated by a non-profit organization. this bond does not require the city to repledge the bond. if approved the sponsors will submit an application to the planning committee in january. we anticipate that we'll return to the board of supervisors in

march of next year to approve the issuance of the bond. the project is scheduled to begin construction in june of next year and will be ready for occupancy in september of 2021. this concludes my presentation. i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. i'm joined by a representative from the development team. thank you. >> thank you very much. there is no b.l.a. report on this. are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item number 5? seeing none public comment is now closed. >> clerk: resolution authorizing the issuance and delivery of multifamily housing revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $26,967,500 for the purpose of providing financing for the acquisition and rehabilitation of a 67-unit, affordable

multifamily rental housing project located at 385 eddy street >> good morning. i'm from the mayor's office of housing community development. item 6 is a resolution to approve of the issuance of the $28.9 million in tax-exempt bonds for the rehabilitation of an existing single room occupancy development. the issuance of the bonds will allow the project to be acquired and undergo a significant rehabilitation which would include systems and unit work. there will not be -- tenants will have a right to return to those units. there will be internal relocation within the portfolio. the units will continue to serve

hopefullies at the 60% line and below. we ask for the committee today to recommend approval of the resolution resolution resolution. and the project sponsor is here if you have any additional questions about the project. >> thank you very much. any comments or questions? seeing none -- there is no b.l.a. report. any members of the public that would like to comment on item 6? seeing none public comment is closed. if we can move this to the board with a positive recommendation. >> clerk: item 7 resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of a multifamily housing revenue note (tax-exempt) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $76,680,000 and of a multifamily housing revenue note (taxable) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $30,000,000 for the purpose of providing financing for the construction of a 167-unit multifamily rental housing project located at 242

hahn street resolution approving and authorizing the director of the mayor's office of housing and community development to execute an amended and restated loan agreement with block 6 housing partners, l.p., a california limited partnership, for a total loan amount not to exceed $18,647,014 to finance the construction of a 167-unit multifamily rental housing development for low-income households . >> i am the senior project manager with the mayor's office of community housing development. i am here to present on item 8. for item 7, the transaction fundamentals have not changed since the presentation was presented in april of this year. the issuance is still a conduit and financing. the project is in compliance

with all city requirements, including prevailing wage and l.b.e. requirements. since then the developer has secured a debt limit allocation from sidlak and with the city-identified financing team including a lender equity investor, bond counsel other attorneys and the city's municipal adviser. the financing team has met several times and pretend the package before you today. for item # 8 this is to enter into a loan of $18 million. the block 6 project is the first on-site affordable housing development for sunnydaily hope s.f. the development adjacent to the site was completed construction last week. we're excited about that.

and it will soon house families. block 6 is going to consist of 167 units of which 125 of them are public hufing replacement units. the other will be tax credit units and all of them are under 60% tax credit a.m.i. the 125 replacement units will be subsidied by project vouchers. affordability is maintained at a 99-year ground lease with the housing authority that continues to own the land. construction closing for block 6 is expected at the end of november when the documents before you today would be executed. blocks 6 construction will start soon after that with completion expected in december 2021. here with me is the director of hope s.f. we will be glad to answer any questions you have about the project. on behalf of this project, we would like to thank you for your

consideration and ask for continued support of the project. >> thank you very much. any comments or questions from my colleagues. there is a b.l.a. report. can we hear that. >> we reported on item 8 which is the $18.6 million on gap financing. in terms of sources of funds we showed that in table 1 on page 11 of our report and then these funds would be used specifically for the non-construction costs, the development costs for this project. the total project, as you're going to see here summarized is $148.7 million including other sources of funds other than city funds. city funds total on page 12. they add up to about $129.6 million. in terms of the policy consideration, we call out in

our report that the per-unit cost of this project is now about $890,000 development cost. the city's share is in table 2 which is $177,000. but the overall cost is $890,000. we consider this high. we've seen over the years the housing cost construction has gone up. we do recommend that you request from the mayor's office of housing a report back on the drivers of these housing costs. we are revising it a little bit to have the report back for december 9, 2019 to allow them to have the work. otherwise we do recommend approval. >> thank you very much. are there any members of the public that would like to comment on item 7 or 8? seeing none public comment is now closed. colleagues, any comments or questions? yes, supervisor mar.

>> thank you, chair fewer. i know there's a recommendation from the b.l.a. for a report to the board on -- with more explanation about the high -- the relatively high per-unit cost of this project. i was wondering if you could touch on that a little bit right now. >> so in regards to the overall costs one of the things we need to think about as well is the amount of city subsidy in this project. in general we see on average about $229,000 per unit in subsidies. this particular project which has infrastructure costs associated is at $171,000. so it is less than most of our projects in our pipeline. one of the reasons it's so expensive is general, it's a hope s.f. project, the topography of the. it's very difficult because it's sloped and they are grading

issues. we also have relocation issues to move the residents on site to this new housing. that's an additional cost. we're also building parking which is not something we would see on any of our infill sites. those have assisted in keeping these project cost ss lower. >> had there been other projects where the cost per unit is in a similar range of $890,000? >> yeah. you'll see it on other hope s.f. projects. you'll see some of our projects that are higher density. we will put the reasons in our report. >> thank you so much.

>> i also have the same question because parcel q i think that was two years ago, it was dlsh $770,000 per unit and that was two years ago. are we on a time constraint for this because i would like to continue this item and see a detailed charge side by side the expenditures and also why this is costing so much. you were just telling us very casually that topography blah, blah, blah. i would like to see some of those numbers on why the cost is so expensive. i would like to make a motion continuing this item unless you have a chart with you today. i also think when we got a briefing on this and i looked at it with my legislative aid, it never mentioned the cost per unit which should have been included in a briefing to the budget chair and it was not included. is there a time constraint on this today or can we pick up this item next week, as we are

going to have a meeting next week? >> we can pick it up next week. >> that would be great. let's take these items separately. i would make a motion to move 7 to the board with a positive recommendation without objection. thank you very much. and i would like to continue item 8 until the meeting of next week. we can get a detailed breakdown why the cost is so expensive for this project versus another for example project q. if i can take that without objection. thank you so much. madam clerk, do we have any other business for today? >> clerk: there's no other business. >> thank you. we are adjourned.

>> supervisor yee: good afternoon. welcome to the october 8th, 2019 regular meeting of the san francisco board of supervisors. madam clerk, will you please call the roll. >> clerk: thank you mr. president. [ roll call ]

>> clerk: mr. president, you have a quorum. >> ladies and gentlemen, will you please join me in the pledge of allegiance. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation under god indivisible with liberty and justice for all. >> supervisor yee: so, on behalf of the board i would like to acknowledge the staff of sfgtv tom and madias who record each of our meetings and make the transcripts available to the public online. madam clerk are there any communications? >> clerk: yes, we're in receipt of two communication the dade

the october 27th, 2019 from supervisors haney and walton stating they will be absent today in request to be excused from the meeting. >> supervisor yee: can i have a motion to excuse haney and walton from attending today's meeting? made by supervisor safai seconds by sure mandelman. and without objection supervisors haney and walton are excused. colleagues today we are approving the minutes from the september 3rd, 2000 board meeting. are there any changes to these meeting minutes. can i have a motion to approve the minutes by supervisor mandelman and seconded by supervisor mar. and without objection those

minutes will be approved after public comment. madam clerk let's go to our 2:00 p.m. special order. >> clerk: first order of business today is to welcome the honorable mayor london n. breed to present a five-minute address to the board of supervisors. they're being no questions submitted from the he eligible districts. >> supervisor yee: welcome madam mayor. since there are no topics submitted we welcome you to share your remarks. >> the hon. london breed: thank you. i'm here to talk about mental health. because i know that we are all frustrated and that we want real solutions and we all share a goal to help people who clearly are in crisis on our streets. this is a topic that is too big too important to play pop ticks with and it does demand that we

all work together. the universal desire to improve our behavioral health system has thursday the our department of public-health into the public eye. there have been newspaper stories and hearings at the board of supervisors and at our health question questioning the department's decisions. i remind you that this is the same department of public-health that rose to the challenge of combating the h.i.v.-aids epidemic in the 1980s and was the world leader developing new data-driven public-health programs that gave people hope. the department and the city came together to help san franciscos who needed our help the most. today, we are so very close to getting to zero, a milestone that seems unachievable decades ago. our mental health cry six i want to make sure that i understand and share the frustration and

with public-health, i am committed to getting every person in crisis off the streets and into treatment. i know that part of that will help with our legislation that supervisor mandelman led on we just had signed into law by our governor. the department of public-health already serves over 30,000 people through our behavioral health system. 30,000 people. these people are on medical and uninsured and some people have healthy sf with the department of public-health works everyday, to provide quality care for the residents we can know we can do better. that's why i hired a district offer mental health reform to develop accurate information and

analyze the data to understand what we are doing and what is working and also where we need change. and for the last several months, the doctor and the department of public-health have been developing comprehensive plans to help the 4,000 people we have identified that are living on our streets who have serious mental illness and substance use challenges. these san franciscos are the most visible examples of a behavioral health system that is failing the most in need and we can turn this around. and supervisors i invite you all to join me. soon, we will we will help as we

responded to the h.i.v. aids crisis decades ago. with conviction, resolve and real change. supervisors, we need to work together. san franciscans deserve that and i know that we may have some policy differences and that we're not going to agree on everything but we make the hard choices and work together for the good of all residents of the city. we can do that here in these same chambers where the cities most challenging and most important issues are debated on a regular basis. we don't need to go to the ballot. it is a waste of time because we can do what is necessary to move many of the things that we are putting forward right here in this chamber right now and i ask you supervisors to continue to

work with me on accomplishing that goal so that we can make the kinds of changes that we know will have a tremendous impact on a crisis that we faced today and we can make a change for future generations to come. thank you. >> thank you madam mayor for joining us today. this will conclude our special order. this item shall be filed. >> thank you. >> >> ok, madam clerk. can you please call the consent agenda. >> clerk: yes, items 1-12 are on consent. they're considered to be routine if a member objected an idea may be removed and considered separately. >> colleagues, anyone like to

severe any items from the consent agenda? seeing none, madam clerk please call the role. >> >> clerk: on items 1-12. [roll call] these are passed. let's go to our remember agenda. please call items 13 and 14 together. >> clerk: we have two resolutions an easement

agreement and quick claim the'sment between the city and pacific gas for'sment areas at the san francisco international airport west of bay shore property for no cost to accommodate the replacement of a natural gas pipeline and did a lease and use agreement between the city airlines limited to conduct flight operations at san francisco international airport to expire on june 30th, 2021 with a rent of 1.3 million. >> supervisor yee: colleagues, can we take these items same house same call. without objection. these resolutions are adopted unanimously. madam clerk calling the next item. >> clerk: item 15 is a resolution to approve the amended and restated less number l-14100 between the port commission and java house llc where the java house restaurant located at pier 40 and a half at

the embarcadero and to increase the monthly base rent to 4,000 including a tenant option to extend for 10 years with no change to august 31st 2023. >> supervisor yee: can we take this same house same call. it's adopted unanimously. call number 16. >> clerk: a resolution to retroactively approve the sheriff department contract to administer a home detention and electronic monitoring for three years through july 31st, 2022 with two one-year options for renewal and a total contract amount of $3.4 million. >> supervisor yee: can we take this same house same call. it's unanimously adopted. >> clerk: item 17, a resolution to approve inaccordance with the internal revenue code of 1986 the issuance of revenue bonds or loan by the california municipal

finance authority in one or more series pursuant to a plan of financing and not to exceed $65 million to refinance all or a portion of certain outstanding debt obligations originally to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, improvement, equipping and furnishing of facilities located at 890 hey street, 815 buena physical ta. 1564 mission street, 1735 mission street and 154 coal ridge street within the city owned and managed by health right 360. >> supervisor yee: can we take this item same house same call. this resolution is adopted unanimously. >> clerk: an ordinance to amend the planning code to designate 2031 bush street also known as the king building number 0673 as a landmark under article 10 of the planning code and to affirm

the ceqa determination and make appropriate pintings. >> this a amend to designate the building located at 2031 bush street as a landmark under article 10 of the planning code. the building's association the building's association with the social cultural and educational enrichment of japanese americans in san francisco from 1926 to the present quantifies it for this historic landmark status. reading the report, specifically with regard to executive act 9006 in which japanese americans all over california were wrongly and injustly imprisoned in concentration camps is impossible not to be reminded of the many shameful aspects of american history. from the beginning a century ago, they took a radical approach to community by providing education to children of japanese, american immigrants

who were not allowed to go to school in the united states. even before construction of the building in 1926, beginning in 1911 they upheld japanese culture in san francisco. like other japanese language schools around the bay this was more than just a language cool it was a community hub and a gathering place for those who lived nearby. since 1911, it has been dedicated to enriching the lives of children, japanese immigrants and community members through education. today, they operate not only as a language school it also serves to educate the san francisco and bay area communities will japanese traditions. it continues as mission to teach japanese culture broadens the global perspective of members and youth. today, it remains a hub for japanese together to participate in cultural activities and political events and community

organizing. with this strong belief, that it will continue to build on the over 100 years of legacy, i'm very pleased that this building will be officially recognized as a historic landmark after the passing of these amendments. thank you. >> supervisor yee: colleagues, can we take this same house same call? this is passed on first reading. madam clerk call number 19. >> clerk: an ordinance to require commercial parking lots and garages with more than 100 parking spaces to install electric vehicle charging equipment, and to add compliance with the new requirement as a condition of existing as well as future permits for commercial parking lots and garages and to affirm the ceqa determination. >> supervisor yee: can we take this item same house same call. this is passed on first reading unanimously. madam clerk call items 20 and it 21 together.

>> item 20 say resolution to determine that the transfer of a type 21 off sale general beer, wine and spirits liquor license to garfield beach and cvs and located at 399 gare street will not serve the public convenience and requesting that the california department of alcoholic beverage control deny the issuance of this license and item 21 is the resolution to determine that the premise-to premise transfer of a type-21 off-sale general beer, win and distil spirits liquor license and the issuance of a type-86 to whole foods market located at market at 1169 market street will serve the public convenience and requesting the california department of alcoholic beverage control impose conditions on the issuance of this license. >> supervisor yee: can we take this same house same call? without objection these

resolutions are adopted unanimously. >> clerk: ordinance for the planning codes to establish the south of market community planning advisory committee. by city officials and agencies on the implementation of the central soma plan, the western soma area plan the east soma area plan and to revice the membership and duties of a soma community stabilization fund community advisory committee and the eastern neighborhood citizens advisory committee into affirmaffirm the ceqa. >> supervisor yee: this is passed on first reading unanimously. >> clerk: item 23 is a motion to appoint ali jamaliay, aaron flynn, doug bloch,ly a nina parks, jesse stout theresa foglio and sarah payan for