must have list. that is finding an operator willing to commit and invest when people are moving in. temperature. [please stand by]

>> there is just some requirements -- i've worked around it a little bit. but i do think that child care would be very important.

we do have some on-island services already, but we're expecting the island to have a lot more families in the future. and we just want to make sure we're not repeating some of the same issues that we have, you know, in the mainland of san francisco where we have child care wait lists, and the wait lists are 2,000 people. >> okay, great. >> and then -- let's see...i'm also curious -- you cited examples, like mercy and other existing commercial uses on the island. and i've often wondered about whether or not those existing restaurants, which are great, and i go to them, but i wonder what the proportion of local islanders residing on the island are really using those restaurants and retail versus people who are coming from outside of

the island? and just be cognizant -- i think it would be very important for us to make sure we have retail and restaurants that caters to the island residents as opposed to just visitors. i'm sure that will come up during your retail study, but i hope we will hear more about that balance. and that's it. thank you. >> thank you very much. let's go back to what we're doing here. the vision -- actually, we're developing a small city from scratch. that's what treasury island and yoba island represent there. yes, we're going to have at the end of the day, almost 8,000 residents, but the vision of treasure island is to have the point of destination. so it is not only have all this retail. everything we're doing, we have to look at capacity.

and we need to look at the location. and i know from your plan we have the retail corridor, everything all lined up. that is great. for us, here, we will look at the overall map and even see where -- if there could be -- if there are suggestions, i think we could do that. there are successful models all over the country. in fact, when we went to new york, we went to visit so many places, thanks to the commissioner, and some of these places have already -- in brooklyn yard and chelsea island, they're already doing what we are doing here. they are successful models in the bay area. and some other places, in san diego, already in bart, what we are doing. at the end of the day, any mixed use retail should be, again, accommodating

to the residents and also to the visitors out there. the next item on the agenda, if you know, has to do with the parks and open space. that's going to be crucial because we do also have programs that are going to be tied to that. everybody bearing in mind that you're not living free on treasure island and yoba island, we have all of these parks to maintain and all of the ongoing infrastructure, and all of them are going to be tied to the retail activities. and they're going to be tied to the use of the parks and the open space. so the economic scale that needs to be ironed out here is also very important. so that the residents of the island, just like the san francisco mainland, the residents go to where they want to go. you want to provide the basic amenities, but you also want to expand that so that we need to generate that outcome from all of the other places

for the visitors, and also to make treasure island and yorba islands. you want to attract visitors and workshops, just like they're doing. and now we have competitors in candlestick point, and we'll have competitors in chase. have you seen this chase? you should borrow their plan. they are highly ambitious. in fact, their plan is to have everyone go to chase, and so what you have here is very impressive, but it is the beginning of this conversation, and, yes, you can see the commissioners here have a lot of ideas because most of us aren't actively involved with planning, and we want to bring you back for further dia dialogues. are there any questions from the audience? oh, mr. beck, please. >> i was just going to add

then, in conjunction with the child care conversation, t.i.c.d. has been taking the lead on the retail planning, but we're both sitting down with one treasure island and looking at the communities as a whole and child care is a part of that, and the other aspects from the community's facility plan, rooms and spaces, etc. we're having some conversations about that and where that is best located and distributed throughout the island. we also just -- we're pointing out for people at home and in part of the conversation, that retail focus along the island center there, along the southern side of the island, also ties in with the transportation plan. the ferry terminal is

there right in front of building one. the a.c. transit and muni bus service terminate in front of hangar two. and then we have the on-island shuttle that takes people from that transportation hub from the island out to the rest of the island, but could take residents to the grocery store and back without leaving the island. so just the interplay between the transportation planning and the retail planning in that respect. >> thank you. anyone have to convey the last message here? ours is a public/private partnership. what we're also doing here in educating the public is to make this a signature public/private partnership development in the country. everything we have here, the decisions, needs to be mutual. any activity, open ferry

or doing anything, please, we all need to be involved there. we have constituents we need to convey. so hearing about a ferry or something in the press, i don't think we want to go that way. these commissioners here should be part of that, and we're out there, and we're community leaders, and extremely very active in san francisco, and never a day goes by do we not get asked just about everything in the press and everywhere. and so we are working alongside here to make sure that every decision, public decision that we're going to be making on the island, and just go with all of our partners, s.f. c.t.a., and everybody, this commission, and any of the signatures, and how we want to embark on doing that, we all need to be together so we can convey to the city what we are doing, and what this project translates, and we

provide the platform into doing this, communicating with the public. so naturally, everything should come before us, before it even gets out there. so please, help to convey that to everyone. thank you, sir. next on the agenda? >> item number 6, parks operations update. >> i'll be presenting on this item today. martin wiggins, who is managing the design and construction of the parks and also along with mary ann, playing a leading role in this work, is here. so today i just wanted to lay out the early parks delivery schedule. we've talked generally about parks, but i kind of

wanted to list out over the next couple of years which parks we expect to come online. walk through our progress on developing hilltop park o.m m. manual, and then some of the status of the maintenance yard requirements that we've been developing. so during next fiscal year, towards the end of the fiscal year, we expect eastern hilltop park, so this is the -- we talk about hilltop park in the eastern and western sides. the western side is where the fujimoto sculpture will be. eastern hilltop park is where the signal tower used to be. it is a smaller portion of the park. the eastern portion we expect to complete construction late next fiscal year, as well as potentially the dog park on yorba buena road being

completed in that timeframe, and being turned over to tida for operation. in fiscal year '21/'22, we expect several more parks to be coming on line. the western hilltop park, including the side of the piece, clipper cove beach, the storm water gardens on yorba buena islands, the marina plaza, the cultural 1 park, where the chapel is, and the first block of the city side park. so we'll be needing to plan in next year's budget, even if it is only for a few months, to maintain the eastern hilltop park in yorba buena island dog park, but the following fiscal year

we'll have many more facilities coming in over the course of that year. so for hilltop park, o o.m.n.manual, we have the larger o.m. standards, that are setting the standards of maintenance island-wide, but this hilltop park will be the heights specific element for the specific finishes anand plantings within hilltop park. it will inform our development for next year. the draft table of contents that we've developed, and there is a little more meat behind this, but i wanted to keep it at a high level today. defining the levels of service for maintenance in the park, aggregating the warranty information, both contractor warranties for plants establishment and other things, as well as

the physical warranties of the equipment installed in the park. and the landscaping section, including habitat and management elements, the planting concept and strategy for the park, and the planning locations and types and irrigation systems. site furnishings, and then the site paving, lighting and electrical, and special features of the park, including not in this -- not in the eastern hilltop park, but any sculpture, art pieces, slope maintenance, these salvaged water tanks on both high points in the eastern and western park that will be converted into landscape elements, as well as trails and restoration areas. special guidelines, and

then really getting into the details of the site service guidelines and check lists, so these will be kind of the daily, weekly, monthly, seasonal and annual check lists for maintenance and inspection. covering lawn, ground cover, tree and shrub care, guidelines for irrigation, tree pruning, weeding, integrative pest management programs, the fences and site furnishings, and janitorial services and standards, including litter, graffiti removal, sweeping and other minor services. and then the maintenance of lighting, electrical, plumbing and other equipment, as well as site drainage maintenance and observation and reporting of items requiring repair.

on the maintenance yard program requirements, up front there is just the space required for the vehicles and equipment that maintenance forces will be utilizing. preliminary estimate is 15 or more vehicles, including light-duty trucks, heavy-duty trucks, heavy equipment, and potentially some rechargeable kind of coachman, small vehicles as well. e.v. charging facilities, bike racks and storage, and then material storage for oil amendments, mulch and other surfacing materials, plantings, street furniture, back-stock for garbage

cans, liners, benches, light poles. materials in support of events within the parks and open space. and then administrative and engineering spaces, offices, record storage, conference room, shower and locker room facilities, warehouse for the storage of equipment and tools, as well as waste management. we'll need to bring the debris from the neighborhood, we'll need to do some onsite processing before that material is put into compactors for removal by recology, as well as composting of green waste. translating these needs into space requirements, we're looking at a yard of roughly 4500 square feet. and administrative and

engineering building of 500 square feet, 450 to 600 square feet, a warehouse of at least 400 square feet. and then not in these areas -- we're still evaluating it, which is any area required for a nursery operation, if we wanted to have that on the island and it wasn't incorporated into the urban farm area, but there is a potential partnership or leveraging of the urban farm, as we expect the maintenance arm will be located on the edge of the urban farm. and then satellite facilities and a potential y.b.i. annex, and locations for temporary storage of trash as it is collected from individual cans, before it is hauled back to the central location for processing. as well as small tools and other equipment that you

wouldn't want to have to run back and forth to the main yard on a frequent basis. so as we go forward towards january, again, really focusing on producing the draft treasure island parks code, so we have initiate a public outreach and comment period before eventually taking that to the board of supervisors. the development of maintenance standards, you know, having that draft maintenance standards manual, as well as finalizing the o.m. manual, as well as the budget for next year. with that, i'll take questions. >> yes. thank you, bob, for getting to the point where

we are talking about the operations and maintenance manual. it is something that we've been asking for. and i think the budget that goes along with this is something that we're also waiting for, that is in the process of being developed. and so we're hoping to see that some time soon. >> yes. >> the -- in each and every part of this, there is long discussions that can be had. so this is sort of an overall. i think that the one big comment that i would like to make is the importance of sustainability. and in the overlay of all that we do on treasure island, and especially as we restore the habitat, the natural habitat for birds and vegetation, that we look at sustainability

as being the underlying principle for all that we do with regards to the landscape that is on treasure island. i actually just spent a week at the new york botanical garden -- i mentioned that the other day -- and i was so impressed with how they are managing that sustainability in everything that they did, from the soils, from the hydrology, to the exroafting, composting -- i thiy have about 250 acres as well. and i would like to have that particular event, as we look at the operations and maintenance manual, and as we draw up the plans for it. each one of these topics,

i think, we can certainly delve into. perhaps not here, but what i would like to suggest, actually, is that we will set up a committee on the board to look on sustainability. we do have ike, who is with the academy of sciences, who i think can also bring resources to us, ideas to us. i'd like to see some collaborations with other institutions in the city, like the san francisco botanical garden as well, as we look at what we're going to do in all of these different areas. for instance, i do think that we will need to have a horticultural staff that is knowledgeable about the plants that we plant, what their requirements are,

and that's something that i would like to see furthered. the composting facility, for instance, it needs a wide area. and i think -- i am hopeful that we can have a lot of our soil -- a lot of our soil and the compost is like gold for the plants, and that we can have a big enough facility that we can process our own green material and u.s. it for island soil. and so i'd like for you to look specifically at that composting facility because i don't think that the yard of 4500 square feet is going to be sufficient, if you you're really having a sufficient compost facility. and we can look at other models as well.

i think in general today, that's my overriding comment. but in each one of these areas, such as the pest management system, you know, the type of plantings that we're going to have, the type of irrigation -- all of that, i think we can have further conversations on. and so i look forward to having the draft manual and having specific discussions on each -- some of the major topics in that manual. >> thank you. commissioner lye? >> i would add that i would be supportive of a new committee focused on sustainability, that director sonn had mentioned. if we're going to set up a new community, focus on that umbrella, and it should probably cover other topics of sustainability across the island, including

continuing to evaluate our renewal energy program, as well as our -- all of our great water systems. i think there is a lot of things on the island that touches sustainability or resiliency issues, and because we've done a lot of preplanning around the island's green efforts, i think it probably makes sense to have a dedicated time where we can talk about these issues more specifically. thanks. >> yes. thank you. and i also am very in agreement with that. and, concurrently, we also need to be talking about the maintenance, the management of the parks. i think all of what you've done today is really great, or, actually, part of the program that we need to do. however, the overriding issue that we need to resolve and we need to work on immediately,

simultaneously, it is about the parks maintenance. we saw, again, successful models on the east coast and all over the place. what we have here is a great opportunity to collaborate and also do things that san francisco has never done before. i think one of the struggling issues in the city, after the dissolution of the san francisco development agencies that we have created all these facilities, all these parks, and now we have to grapple with the maintenance of them. with treasure island, we know what the issues are, and we also know where we want to go, especially since, again, i need to refer to the point of destination, and treasure and yorba buena must also be self-sustainable, also. whatever the proceeds we get and how we manage all of these parks goes back to the infrastructure, goes back to the

maintenance, goes back to making this a vibrant place that you really want it to be. so this is great. and we will continue this dialogue. thank you, mr. beck, for this information. okay. any other public comments on this particular item? none? okay. go to the next item. >> item number 7, discussion of future agenda items by directors. >> okay, commissioners, any -- i think we will continue to parks open space, and in particular, we would like to see some movement, again, on the management. this is a very, very important matter. thank you. let me see. any other suggestions, commissioners? i'm sure you can relay that later, what you would like to see in future agenda. okay, thank you all for being here and for all of those watching remotely

and for the staff and our development partners. thank you. have a great day. >> the meeting is adjourned. >> thank you. adjourned. >> shop & dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challenges residents to do their shop & dine in the 49 with within the 49 square miles of

san francisco by supporting local services within the neighborhood we help san francisco remain unique successful and vibrant so where will you shop & dine in the 49 my name is jim woods i'm the founder of woods beer company and the proprietor of woods copy k open 2 henry adams what makes us unique is that we're reintegrated brooeg the beer and serving that cross the table people are sitting next to the xurpz drinking alongside we're having a lot of ingredient that get there's a lot to do the district of retail shop having that really close connection with the consumer allows us to do exciting things we decided to come to treasure island because we saw it as an amazing opportunity can't be beat the views and real estate that great county starting to

develop on treasure island like minded business owners with last week products and want to get on the ground floor a no-brainer for us when you you, you buying local goods made locally our supporting small business those are not created an, an sprinkle scale with all the machines and one person procreating them people are making them by hand as a result more interesting and can't get that of minor or anywhere else and san francisco a hot bed for local manufacturing in support that is what keeps your city vibrant we'll make a compelling place to live and visit i think that local business is the lifeblood of san francisco and a vibrant

>> this is tuesday, october 15, 2019. welcome members of the public. >> the first order of business is item 1, roll call. commission members please respond. (roll call). >> all members are present and the next order is announcements. a, the next regularly scheduled meeting held on november 5, at 1:00 p.m. in city hall room 416. b, pro huntion sound electronic devices of meeting. be advised that pagers and similar sound-producing devices are prohibited and please be advised the chair may order the removal of any person responsible for the use of a cell phone, pager or sound-producing device. announcement of time allotment. any member of the public has up

to three minutes to make public comments on each agenda item unless the commission adopts a shorter period on any item. it is strongly recommended members ha wis who wish to addre commission, fill out a speaker card. report on actions at a previously close session and there are to reportable actions. the next order of business is item 4, matters of unfinished business and no matters of unfinished business. the next order of business is item 4, matters of unfinished -- excuse me, the next order of business is item 5, matters of new business consistenting of consent and regular agenda. first a consent agenda, 5a, approval of minutes from september 17th, 2019. mr. chair? >> madam secretary, any speaker cards. >> no speaker cards. >> anybody wishing to speak and seeing none i'll close public

comment and close to fellow commissioners for any comments or if anyone would like to move this item. >> no questions. >> i make a motion to adopt minutes of september 17th, 2019. >> i second it. >> commissioner scott. we have a first and second and madam secretary, please take roll. >> please announce your vote comment i announce your name. (roll call). >> mr. chair, the vote is for ayes. >> thank you. >> please call the next item. >> the next is a regular agenda, agenda itemss 5b through 5d for candlestick point will be presented and acted on together. 5b, including mitigation measures, pursuant to the california to the quality act of

the 2019 modified project variance for phase two of the shipyard including findings, the implementation of a threshold of significance for evaluating impacts on miles travels, the redevelopment area and bayview hunters point. discussion 25-2019, 5c, adopting findings pursuant to the environment quality act and, the candlestick development and discussion and action resolution number 26-2019. 5d, adopting findings pursuant to the california environmental quality act and approving a major phase amendment for major phase one, including associated revisions to the infrastructure plan and candlestick point, conversion of nonresidential

uses within the hunter's point area skph transfe and office use redevelopment plan area to the bayview plan area and approving a modification and hunter's point project and bayview project area. discussion and action, resolution 27-2019. madam director? >> thank you, madam secretary, through the chair. the item before you, as you recall, two weeks ago, at a last meeting, our team presented the work plan in front of you today, so today we're asking for an approval of what was presented and staff is going to incorporate some of the recommendations we heard from the commission. just a few highlights, converting rcmp na regional to , makinmaking adjustments, as wels community facilities and so on

and then, of course, this workforce component and as you know, this is the framework and sets the framework for continued work that needs to be done over the implementation of th this p. with that, i will turn it to lyla so i don't repeat what she will be presenting on and we have the entire team here, as well as development partners, as well, t. >> i'm the senior project manager for hunter's point ship shipyard. just as the director noticed, two weeks ago, in a detailed presentation on the vision and goals related to the proposed amendments for the major phase, which needs to be implemented through a series of amendments to regulatory documents governing the development of candlestick point. today, you will give a quick overview of some of the plans

that you saw previously and then get into the details of which amendments are tied to which regulatory documents. also, sally, deputy director, will give a quick overview for candlestick point and i'll come back to the podium. here is a broad overview, probably essentially lists out what i just spoke about and then, the commission secretary read the one before you. the first for findings for addendum 6 and the third resolution covers the adoption, the major phase as well as changes to the infrastructure plan, transportation plan, conversion of square footage that is allowed for the bayview redevelopment plan and transfer some square footage for the shipyard to candlestick point.

this sha look familiar from the last meeting. this is an overview and mostly we'll be talking about candlestick point. i have several images to context usecontextualize where we are, showing neighborhoods in candlestick point and you have the center in grey here and we probably won't have these names for the future neighborhoods but this is just to orient you of the whole candlestick air and griff is to the west and to the east is candle park south. and now zooming in, into the major phase, another aerial overview with the major phase of the subphases within the major phase talking about, a cpo one which includes the first phases of alison that have been built and the other major phases we've

been talking about today. and just a quick overview. this is the hir hierarchy of documents many of you are familiar with, the order of how we get from very broad documents like the redevelopment plan, the dda, then down to other project documents that regulate the development and major phases and then subphases and then to the vertical designs you have seen before you. and then to recap, there's been many prior aprojects bu approvae amended it and i'll you turn it over to sally to talk about the overall housing program. >> good afternoon. again, we thought it was important to revisit the housing

program within the project and highlight a few things not changing, as well as can't points that are changing. so a key point today is that the bmr housing plan within the dda is not changing. so now are the number of total units, the required range of inclusionary housing, nor the senior inclusionary project are changed to the actions today. what you'll hear about later from lyla is the proposal to rearrange the market rate and inclusionary hous housing withie cp center, as well as the inclusionary housing from later phasing into cpo2. as a quick refresher in major phase one, the first housing completed was alice griffith, phase 4 founded by ocii and the developer. here is an overview of the

housing units delivered, the full build-out of shipyard phase two where you see over 10,000 total units, over 3300bmr units and the projectachieves 32% of afforability. in candlestick, the total amount is 3,000 housing units which is an increase of 400 units, thanks again to the developer advancing some of the housing into cpo26789. 2. major phase one will achieve 39% affordable. affordability. this is looking at candlestick as a whole and so here is a visual of the bmr housing map from the dda and the colored blocks represent the alice griffith lots, ocii lots and workforce housing lots and these are not changed through the actions today. now ouour stand-alone blocks ala

full spectrum of housing and opportunities for deep affordability. you're familiar with the public housing replacement units in alice gruff fifth serving zero to 60% of area med-i medium inc. there will be homeless housing and rental housing units and what's changing today is just rearranging of the grey blocks in that triangels in the cp center. of course, one of the most important aspects of the bmr program are the people who live there and so there is a robust set of occupancy projects that will govern the housing projects.

there are additional phases for any previous householding that left and want to come back. so oci staff is working hard to think of ways to increase our outreach to certificate of preference holders and we'll be coming back before you in a month for our annual cop program report but i'll give you a sneak preview of some of the things looking at are ways to continue to improve and increase our outreach range, including ways to use social media. we're looking into trying to create an inner active map to allow potential cop holders to see more easily if they resided in an address that is eligible to receive a certificate of reference and, of course, we are

going to continue to implement our recent practise of income tiering through properties, proe projects are spread across multiple levels to maximize opportunities for cop holders. you know, of course, the most immediate way to serve cop holders is ensuring we have housing units to move into which is why seeing progress is so critical to oci's mission. so with that, i'll turn it back to lyla to continue the presentation but i'm happy to answer any housing questions after the commission takes public comment. >> and so here on this slide is a summary of community benefits, none of which are changing. we are essentially the developers and compliance, a lot of these community benefits were triggered when the first major

phase was approved and later i'll be talking about the lots moving but in teres o terms of e actual compliance, the developer is compliant and nothing is proposed related to the dda body of the community benefits. so again, if you look at the map, the tan, the beige area is major phase one, cp, which is what we are talking about. if you look at the map, cpo3 and 4, man seven of the blocks havee before the commissioner for vertical, schematic design review and you have seen those and you have cp center which we refer to as cpo2. and so now, i'm going to drill down deeper into the proposed amendments here. i'm skipping ahead. so this is an overview of the

major phase application amendments that you heard two weeks ago but broadly, it's about adding more housing to the cp center area. it's about reducing the regional retail, removal of the tower site and pane o many other itemd hear thahere that we will get ie next slides here. there's phoufbgss t phoufbgs toe schedule performance where the developer will deliver parks and the horizonal infrastructure and we're shifting those one to three years because we spent the last couple of years retooling this plan and needing to go out and do the actual approvals, the community process and now after this step, we will have to go seek permits and that whole time has shuted the schedule performance and we've updated the performance.

the alison griffin neighborhood is moving the facility lot from where it was previously in cpo3 to the alice griffin neighborhood area and then the retention of the frendalda childcare play area. so this map should look familiar. what is currently the land use plan to your left and what is proposed. if you look at the pink area, it was the outlet mall area in the map and to the right, you see a lot more housing. again, here is some know many clanomenclaturei'll be using the presentation, the outfield and infield, keeping in line with references to the old stadium and i'm just going to zoom in more on what's happening on each

partpart of the pie or home pla. and so back in 2017, we had a retail center and you see the red representing regional retail and now you see the 2019, office, housing and you see retail lining the area to serve neighborhood uses and you have a certain amount of regional retail in the 2019 plan, as well. so this is the outfield program, the summary the square footage of the units and outfield area. if you go up now to the infield, the dark blue area, the film and art's center. that has always been a part of the project. the location has moved from where it was previously located but still a part of the land use program and then you have the senior housing at 60% ami and multifamily housing in the infield.

so this is a summary from a square footage percentage of what has changed between the 2016 approval and currently what is proposed and you see changes in the neighborhood retail and you see the performance and the venue is getting smaller. the hotel, the square footage is smaller. now we will zoom in on alice griffith. this map represents the different types of neighborhood. you have workforce and market housing and the first face of pf alice on this map. we want to highlight where the community facility lot that is supposed to be used for a community used for fire, school or police is being located from

what is cp1a to the alice griffith neighborhood to serve the residential neighborhood in that area. but you see purple remaining on the right-hand side for community use and reserved for possible fire station. so now, talking about frandeljia, if you look at ag8 to the housing map that sally covered, ag8 would be a mark rate lodgmarketrate lodge but ag with the te tenants, they need t to function and we are keeping that as a playground area and the market rates will be distributed throughout the other market rate unit s.

s. we're not changing the percentage amount but since the development plan is shutting froshiftingfrom a retail to lard residential, your defact tow deo reducing the amount for spaces the change you see is the cp center and i'll show you this map, these are all of the locations of the community facility spaces, most of which have been approved through the vertical designs before this commission. and so you see all of these locations lining as well as ingerson which is the main retail corridor and you have harhaveharney with retail and ye

the african marketmace to have . the orange is highlighting 3,000 of community facility spaces that would be located in major phase two, part of major phase one and that is the welcome center for state parks. that's part of the requirement. and then this is the end results of all of the changes and this is a land use map essentially, what you end up with and you have the community facility lot and west side of the site plan, you have office at cpo2 and then you have a lot more red residenl in cpo2. another viewpoint, just to look at it differently, amassing that you can see the major phase.

so then you want to talk about the design for development, which essentially functions as a zoning code for candlestick point containing all of the guidelines to shape the future of the cp center as well as all of candlestick. this is tai tailor-made for a regional center for the land uses proposed within the cp center. oci staff, five-point and planning department worked closely on the changes in the d for d and it's in your packet, you have a red line of what all of the changes are and examples, just some of the examples of the starstandards are set-backs, sie coverage and how you activate the ground floor.

there's also more information on some of the other items that are contained within the d for d minutes. we are also proposing a height of course acceptioexception whe% allowance to cover mechanical equipment and then also allow for 10% deviation. these are -- that deviation is consistent with what we approved for the d for d. this we went over at the workshop, as well, the height changes and all of the height changes are happening within the candlestick center part of the project. if you look at the map in 2016, you had a tower before and that is being removed in the candlestick center site. you have increases from 65 to 85 to 120 towards the back part of

the site where the mixed use office is and then in the internal part, you have increase from 65 to 85 feet and on the productiveryperiphery, you haveo 85 feet. so the schedule performance changes as i discussed earlier is having shuts between one to three years and then towards the end, th, there's a shut. the major subtpa*use subphases t from one to three years. i'll talk about the other documents. the other documents that are very much involved with our city family infrastructure plan. we work with all of the city adoptdepartments so we work wit, public works, mta related to the

infrastructure plan and all of these amendments have been vetted by those city agencies and so, i just want -- you have detail summaries in your package, but this is some high level changes. one is a sea level rise design criteria updated to match wha what -- to the 2012 standards that have been adopted and certainlyessentially, it's a hir finish floor required for the project. the developer contemplated this and had been designing the project to those standards already. so it's more about catching up the document to the actual standard. and then we have private utili utilities on right streets and that's something to get the city's ok on and that's a part of the project, as well. we have something called the auxillary water supply which allows enough to fight fires in

event there's a fire and then a complicated on how to build that system and puc and ocui and the developer will be working through future changes on, maybe, how we fight those fires and provide enough hydraulic capacity on the source and so there will be possibly a future amendment to the document. and that's one of the requests and one of the resolutions to delegate that voter t authorityr director when they have worked together on how we will provide actauxillary water supply system and then matches to what we have made in the transportation plan.

you have express shuttle, the brt and the 29. i would like to turn to the environmental review which is the big document you see here which requires studies that we need to do for these amendments and this is an addendum six that is a part of the project, part of these project amendments and it concludes that the scope of the project will not result in any new impacts or cause any new

significant impacts but the other important thing that i'm going to talk about in the next couple of slides that we are also adopting a different threshold on how to measure significant transportation impacts to be more compatible with how the state and the planning department is now measuring transportation impacts. and so, this is about vehicle mile travel. currently, you know, the 2010 spa*u2010 err uses level of sere and this focuses on how lan usee and transportation affects drives instead of how these projects change the amount of driving. changes to driving condition taz resulsthat result in an increast changes do not fully describe the environmental impacts associated with greenhouse gas emissions and fuel consumption. so evaluating projects based on

vehicle miles traveled instead of level of service, changes the evaluation from impacts to drivers to measuring the impact of driving itself. so it's a much more effective way of really figuring out a project's true impact. staff has reviewed state and local city planning guidelines and staff recommends that the commission adopt the vmp, vehicle miles traveled, for the purposes in accordance with state and planning pwhraoeupbs. guidelines. we're doing what was previously done but we're adopting the new standard. and so slide 40, again, the workforce requirements for this project has not changed. this slide is showing the current status for slide point on current contracting and workforce status and with this