>> good morning this. is the october 16, 2019 budget committee. i am supervisor fewer. i am joined by supervisor mandelman. i would like to thank sfgovtv. do you have any announcements? >> please silence cell phones and electronic devices and complete speaker cards as part of the file submit to the court. items today will appear on the

october 22nd board of supervisors agenda. >> please read item one. >> resolution authorizing resolution and acceptance to a lease for the real property located at 350 rhode island street north for a rent credit at $2.6 million in consideration for a waiver of certain real estate expense passed through protections for the city under the lease. >> today we have the department of real estate. >> good morning, chair fewer. director of real estate. today we are seeking your positive recommendation for a resolution to authorize a first a mend to the lease with lexington lion san francisco for the property at 350 road a island. -- rhode island.

the board of supervisors approved this with the city as tenant to relocate the district of attorney from the hall of justice and 732 brannon. in most commercial leases the landlord is entitle to pass through a share of the property taxes to the tenants. when possible to protect the city we include provision we call a prop 13 protection. section 4.76 the current lease contains a provision to protect the city from pass-through tax increases based upon recessments if the property is sold prior to july 2021 in this particular case. the owner is planning to sell the property. this lease amendment seeks to remove the prop 13 protection in exchange for rent credit of $2.85 million. in other words, the landlord is seeking to buyout the city's prop 13 protection.

$2.85 million is a negotiated figure based upon the estimated sales price of $134 million. at that price, it is anticipated that the recessment will result in a pass-through to the city of approximately $55,302 per month. $2.85 million credit will be provided to the city during the next two fiscal years. alternatively if city doesn't agree the land lord will wait to sell the property until after july 24, 2021 where the city would have no protections from the tax increase. in your packet there is an amendment to the resolution due to additional resolutions we were able to increase the represent credit from $2.6 million to $2.85 million. that red line reflects that increase in the credit.

i would like to thank supervisor peskin for his efforts in negotiation. i would like to thank the bla for hard work and we accept their recommendation. this concludes my presentation. john updike is here and he and i are available to answer any questions. >> nick mennards from budget analyst office. this would approval the amendment for 350 rohode island. under the current lease if the building is sold prior to july 2021, lexington must pay the city the increased property tax passed through by the new owner. under the proposed amendment to the lease if the building is sold lexington would pay the city $2.85 million now that the legislation is revised. regardless of what the property

tax increase actually is. we looked at the original amount from $2.6 million. on page 3 in table one, it is equivalent to 47 months of protection. we calculated net present value of the potential tax increases at sales prices and considered $2.6 million sufficient to compensate the city for the increase in property taxes. we continue to remember approval of the resolution given the increased amount. >> thank you very much. any comments or questions? seeing none, public comment. any public comment on item 1. seeing none, public comment is closed. i would like to thank supervisor pegs kin for his -- peskin for his work on this. i would like to move this to the board with a positiontive recommendation. >> i believe there is an

amendment. >> i make a motion to accept the amendment without objection. i would like to move this to the board with a positive recommendation as amended. thank you, madam clerk. can you please call item 2. >> resolution authorizing the mayor's office of housing and community development to execute the restated loan agreement with block 6 housing agreement for $18.6 million to finance the construction of is a 167 unit multi family rental housing development for low income households sunnydale hope sf block 6. >> thank you very much. we have sarah from mo hcd. i went to comment last week at the budget and finance committee i continued this item. it seems as though i was working off numbers that were not quite accurate. today we are getting a

clarification. thank you very much. >> thank you. the bla report last week raised concerns regarding construction costs on a preliminary number for parcel q and the final cost. we see appreciate the opportunity to clarify the development cost and block 6 today for sunnydale. this project is part of the hope sf initiative, which is a transformation of the communities that have seen decades of disinvestment. we are not only rebuilding the e public housing to include the communities without displacement of other residents. to date we have committed and rehoused 353 families at allis griffith. because of the scale and the time it takes to develop the project, the board will see the projects at different phases.

the report for the parcel q cost is at the end of 2016. parcel q numbers were based on cost per square foot. parcel q received full entitlements in march 2017 and construction in february 2018. the numbers here updated

the project over two years ago. thanks for your consideration. we are here to answer questions as well as the director of public housing initiatives. >> thank you for the clarification. any comments or questions by collies? see -- colleagues. did we have a report on this last week? >> we did. i have nothing more to add except we revised the recommendation to clarify what we are recommending. we recommend the committee a the resolution to request a report by december 9th.

>> public comment is now closed. i make a motion to accept the amendment from the bla without objection. thank you very much. a motion to move this with a positive recommendation as amended. thank you very much. please call item 3. ordinance to seek approval from the board of supervisors and mayor to execute memorandum with the city with a term up to 20 years providing the issuance of mountain view of to revokable license for the land for public recreational purposes in exchange for mountain view's grant for the easement and agreement to perform other services. >> thank you very much. >> good morning, supervisors. we seek your approval of the memorandum of agreement with the city of mountain view for use of land owned by the city and county of san francisco under the p.u.c.'s jurisdiction and

mountain view. the moa has several components. this results from over three years of negotiation between the staff and mountain view staff. if approved it will provide a model for future collaboration with other agencies. the p.u.c. has jurisdiction over parcels of real property in the city of mountain view. they are 80 feet line over which the transmission lines run. >> where is the picture? you can see the 80-foot right-of-way. mountain view uses a lot of our parcels for recreational uses such as parks, trails and a senior garden, and we allow these uses pursuant to seven

outdated rent free revocable permits. they dire to construct a -- they desire to construct a new park. in order to make this happen, we desire to enter into the moa before you with these components. the p.u.c. will issue seven new rent free modern licenses to replace the outdated licenses. these are for recreational uses on the p.u.c. parcels. the p.u.c. will issue a new n w license. these will have a potential term of 20 years. each will have an initial 10 year term and two five year extension terms to take effect unless the parties decide to terminate one of the licenses or mountain view is in default under the terms of license.

as consideration for the eight new licenses mountain view will provide the following nonmonetary consideration to the p.u.c. under the moa. first, mountain view will grant the puv permanent sub surface easement rights at no cost. in street crossings where the p.u.c. maintains pipeline and does not have doc you mentation of street -- documentation. they are at san mateo road and mountain view. by obtaining these easements the p.u.c. will avoid the risk and huge cost of being forced to relocate its pipelines within these street crossings. this has occurred in the east bay in the past. this is a situation we desire to avoid at all costs. second, as consideration for the

eight licenses mountain view will maintain a vacant p.u.c. parcel unless licensed to another party. this will save the cost of maintaining the property with trash removal and occasional weed removal. third, mountain view will remove 29 problem trees that prevent pipeline hazards on the p.u.c. parcels. mountain view will assist with community outreach to remove these trees and future encroachments pursuant to did encroachment policy. fourth, mountain view will reimburse for the property taxes the p.u.c. pays for the parcels that mountain view uses. currently the p.u.c. pays property taxes on all property in mountain view to the county of san mateo under our modern practice.

the revocable licensees are to reimburse us for property taxes. the taxes are so old there is no reimbursement. by entering new licenses we will recoup the property taxes for these parcels. fifth, the p.u.c. will pay for the cost of mitigation and removal of the mountain view improvements on the land if we need to disrupt improvements for. pipelines. moa will stay in effect so long as the licenses are in effect up to 20 years. based upon the substantial nonmonetary consideration the p.u.c. will receive from mountain view and property tax reimbursement. we recommend the board of supervisors wave approval requirements in 23.3 and 23.30

for this transaction. mountain view's recreational use is consistent with the p.u.c.'s community benefits to promote community health in the jurisdictions in which it has pipeline. the city of mountain view approved this in february of 2016 and commission approved it on may 28, 2019. thank you for your consideration. i am available for any questions. >> this opens to public comment. any members of the public want to comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> we are looking at this map that shows us the sites. these are all outdoor recreational sites is that correct. >> yes. >> is that area in green property of p.u.c. or just the areas with the recreation areas?

>> the area in green is the entire pipeline right-of-way we own. all but one parcel is licensed. we have a lot of agreements with private landowners for use of the right-of-way for uses like parking, landscaping, the rent comes back to the p.u.c. to defray the cost of operations. the parcels that are marked, i believe it is in yellow, are existing permits to the city of mountain view. you will see these are be loved recreational uses. >> so what i am looking at. there is a green line on our map. that green line is the pipeline. >> the property through which two pipelines run. >> our property we own? >> yes, the city and county of san francisco owns it under the p.u.c. jurisdiction.

>> all of this property here? >> yes. >> we have been given them this property rent free for how long? >> some licenses go back to 1970 when this was agricultural land. >> and then we are going into an agreement with them that says that they are able to use these areas for a park and that in-turn we have been paying taxes on this property that we own to mountain view, is that correct? >> no, we pay property taxes to the county of santa clara. mountain view for years reimbursed for some of the property taxes we pay. two or three of the existing licenses are so old there is no property tax reimbursement requirement in the licenses. >> for three-pieces of property there is no tax reimbursement? >> i believe so, yes.

>> do you know how much we have paid in taxes for those three-pieces of property? >> i don't know. the city of san francisco acquired this property many years ago. our property tax base is low. we could come back with that information if you require it. >> i am trying to understand the agreement that we own this property but we don't own some of the right-of-way, and that is what they are giving to us. is that correct? >> so we think we own some of the property in the street

for this agreement. >> may i answer? >> yes, so sorry. >> mountain view is waiting for this. the p.u.c. has a long standing commission policy that we allow free parks on our land in the communities in which we have our infrastructure. the free parks are with long standing policy.

it is a plus and mountain view is giving us this additional consideration of the permanent easements taking down very problematic trees that would cost thousands of dollars for the p.u.c. to remove and obtaining modern licenses that include complete property tax reimbursement. >> so my question. is there a timeline on this? >> mountain view would like this yesterday. >> supervisor stefani. >> with regard to the free parks in mountain view, are we paying, also, to maintain those parks? >> no, under the p.u.c. licenses, the p.u.c. alleviates the maintenance by having whoever occupies the park maintain the park. >> i was thinking of sterling

park in my district. thank you. >> there is no bla report on this. any questions? my hesitancy is, i am not convincedded it is fair -- convinced it is fair value, quite frankly. i don't see any real numbers that show that this is sort of a fair sort of transaction and we are getting our fair share of what i think this is an agreement of convenience. i don't think it is an agreement that is actually monetarily to our benefit. i am going to be frank.

therefore, i think that we have had this long standing relationship in mountain view and they want it yesterday. it doesn't seem to raise alarm from my colleagues. i just want on the record i think this is an agreement of convenience and not to -- this is the budget and finance committee and not really an agreement that benefits us monetarily. having said that, yes. >> can i make a suggestion? >> i agree with your line of thinking and not having further information does feel a little bit taken advantage of, i don't know. if we can request maybe follow-up information, approve it. >> more in-depth reports on whether or not -- to meet your concerns. >> i would just say that i just

don't see -- this is the budget and finance committee so i normally like to see some numbers on this. the value of the land that we are giving to them for free and also the cost. i get we have these pipes and that it would be ridiculous for us to redo them, but i don't really see sort of this cost balance and how we are benefiting monetarily. i can have a further discussion after this about maybe some numbers that i would like to see, however, i am willing to pass this out of committee today. i would like to make a recommendation to move this out of committee to the full board with a positive recommendation on the agreement that i believe ms. russell will come back and

give us our offices or even through e-mail some mormon terry or he -- monetary or physician calling analysis of this agreement. >> thank you very much. i would like to make a motion to move to the board with positive recommendation. thank you very much, supervisor stefani for your assistance. >> can you please read item 4. >> resolution authorizing the department of public health to submit a one-year application for 2020 to receive funding for h.i.v. and prevention programs and requesting $7 million in funding from january 1, 2020 to january 31, 2020. >> supervisor mandelman. >> thank you, madam chair.

i am going to invite johnny mill car to tell us about that. >> i am the healthcare coordinator in the community health equity and promotion branch. we are responsible for the allocation of h.i.v. prevention funds in the city. what is before you is an application or resolution to authorize our application for continued cdc funding a little over $7 million for the year 2020. that funding is actually allocated in three different pots. there is a primary pot for just about $4.2 million for the core h.i.v. prevention services. a little bit over $800,000 for epidemiology and surveillance

efforts. $2 million for opt-in or special demonstration project for low thresholds services for those experiencing homelessness. i am here to answer any program answers you may have. >> there is no report. let'sopen up for comment. seeing none, public comment is closed. supervise other mandelman. >> i move for a positive recommendation. >> without objection. can you please call item 5. >> resolution authorizing the department of public health to submit application to receive funding for the emergency relief grants program for the administration and requesting $16.1 million in h.i.v. emergency funding for the

eligible area for march 1, 2020 through 2021. >> do you want to tell us about this one? >> good morning. i am the assistant director of h.i.v. services. we service the grantee and administrator of federal and state grant dollars to provide services to low income san franciscans with h.i.v. i am here to request support for our annual application of grant dollars of $16.1 million and change. you have the amount in front of you. this reflects this year's current award plus 5% increase, which is the maximum allowable application we could submit based on the calculation. when we receive the grant we take about 10% off for

administrative cost. the remaining dollars are split between the three county ema with san francisco receiving 88% of the funding based on the proportion of persons living with h.i.v. in the three county area. it supports health services for h.i.v. positive ranging from primary care to dental, food, legal, home healthcare, transitional housing and other services. this funding represents 43% of the $37 million budget that we used to provide services for low income under insured h.i.v. positive persons. we work with the planning council who was mandated to prioritize ana and to allocate. in the last several years it has been reduced as san francisco's share of the total national

h.i.v. caseload diminishes in

seven years. the greater of percentage structure or minimum annual guarantee of $225,000. they will operate a themed gift store called hello karl which is a name to the fog in san francisco. it will include products from local artists. hat makers and charles chocolates. the budget analyst rereviewed

this list. >> can we have the report, please? >> yes. so the proposed resolution would approve the lease between airport and mrg with a term of seven years and guaranteed rent of $225,000 increasing each year. over the seven year term the airport would receive at least $1.75 million. we recommend approval of this resolution. >> thank you very much. let's take public comment. any members of the public like to comment on item 6? seeing none it is closed. >> supervisor mandelman. >> we only got one bidder here. >> for these leases we have been having difficulty finding bidders. we consider anything besides news stands. it is more expensive for the operators to come in and they have competition from online

sales, from different retailors that way and so the specialty retails we have done this to get more bidders and replaced restriction on the number of leases at the airport which is eight lease max. they pick and choose which leases they would like to go for. a different variety of reasons where the specialty retail leases have been we have had less than the concessions with our restaurants and other retailers. >> other than more outreach there aren't any particular changes we could make to get more? >> we have been trying in terms of outreach we have our first flyers' conference -- supplier's conferences. really making this connection between the big operators and

connecting them with local artisans and goods to be sold at the airport so encouraging business that wea way so that wn passengers come through they see the retail concepts available. it is difficult in the past especially the electronic leases for that lease we only have a couple operators like brookstone and they went out of business. we are trying to different concepts and reaching out to different people and having more partnerships available. different ways so that we have more competition. it is definitely something in front of mind. >> thank you very much. >> i would like to move to the board with positive recommendation without objection. thank you very much. any other business before us today? >> no other business. >> great. we are adjourned.

>> hi. my name is carmen chiu, san francisco's aelectricitied assessor. today, i want to share with you a property tax savings programs for families called proposition 58. prop 58 was passed in 1986 and it was helped parents pass on their lower property tax base to their children. so how does this work? under california's prop 13 law, the value we use to calculate your property tax is limited to 2% growth peryear. but when ownership changes,

prop 13 requires that we reassess properties to market value. if parents want to pass on their home or other property to their children, it would be considered a change in ownership. assuming the market value of your property has gone up, your children, the new owners, would pay taxes starting at that new higher level. that's where prop 58 comes in. prop 58 recognizes the transfer between parents and children so that instead of taxing your children at that new higher level, they get to keep your lower prop 13 value. remember, prop 58 only applies to transfers between parents and children. here's how the law twines an eligible child. a biological child, a step child, child adopted before the age of 18, and a son-in-law or daughter-in-law. to benefit from this tax saving program, remember, you just have to apply. download the prop 58 form from

our website and submit it to our office. now you may ask, is there a cap how much you can pass on. well, first, your principal residence can be excluded. other than that, the total tap of properties that can use this exclusion cannot exceed $1 million. this means for example if you have two other properties, each valued at $500,000, you can exclude both because they both fit under the $1 million cap. now what happens hwhen the totl value you want to pass on exceeds $1 million. let's say you have four properties. three with current taxable value of $300,000 and one at $200,000, totaling $1.1 million in value. assuming that you decide to pass on properties one, two, and three, we would apply the exclusions on a first come, first served basis. you would deduct properties one, two, and three, and you

would still have $100,000 left to pass on. what happens when you pass on the last property? this property, house four, has been existing value of 2 -- has an existing value of $200,000, and its existing property value is actually higher, $700,000. as i said, the value left in your cap is $100,000. when we first figure out your portion, we figure out the portion that can be excluded. we do that by dividing the exclusion value over the assessed value. in this case, it's 50%. this means 50% of the property will remain at its existing value. meanwhile, the rest will be reassessed at market value. so the new taxable value for this property will be 50% of the existing value, which is 200,000, equaling 100,000, plus the portion reassessed to market value, which is 50% times $700,000, in other words,

350,000, with a total coming out to $450,000. a similar program is also available for prepping transfers fl interest r from grandparents to grandchildren. if you're interested in learning more visit our website or >> i personally love the mega jobs. i think they're a lot of fun. i like being part of a build that is bigger than myself and outlast me and make a mark on a landscape or industry. ♪ we do a lot of the big sexy jobs, the stacked towers, transit center, a lot of the

note worthy projects. i'm second generation construction. my dad was in it and for me it just felt right. i was about 16 when i first started drafting home plans for people and working my way through college. in college i became a project engineer on the job, replacing others who were there previously and took over for them. the transit center project is about a million square feet. the entire floor is for commuter buses to come in and drop off, there will be five and a half acre city park accessible to everyone. it has an amputheater and water marsh that will filter it through to use it for landscaping. bay area council is big here in the area, and they have a gender equity group. i love going to the workshops.

it's where i met jessica. >> we hit it off, we were both in the same field and the only two women in the same. >> through that friendship did we discover that our projects are interrelated. >> the projects provide the power from san jose to san francisco and end in the trans bay terminal where amanda was in charge of construction. >> without her project basically i have a fancy bus stop. she has headed up the women's network and i do, too. we have exchanged a lot of ideas on how to get groups to work together. it's been a good partnership for us. >> women can play leadership role in this field.

>> i tell him that the schedule is behind, his work is crappy. he starts dropping f-bombs and i say if you're going to talk to me like that, the meeting is over. so these are the challenges that we face over and over again. the reality, okay, but it is getting better i think. >> it has been great to bond with other women in the field. we lack diversity and so we have to support each other and change the culture a bit so more women see it as a great field that they can succeed in. >> what drew me in, i could use more of my mind than my body to get the work done. >> it's important for women to network with each other, especially in construction. the percentage of women and men in construction is so different. it's hard to feel a part of

something and you feel alone. >> it's fun to play a leadership role in an important project, this is important for the transportation of the entire peninsula. >> to have that person -- of women coming into construction, returning to construction from family leave and creating the network of women that can rely on each other. >> women are the main source of income in your household. show of hands. >> people are very charmed with the idea of the reverse role, that there's a dad at home instead of a mom. you won't have gender equity in the office until it's at home. >> whatever you do, be the best you can be. don't say i can't do it, you can excel and do whatever you want. i want to thank mayor london

breed for insisting on a transit environment. she is a huge champion of the permanent project in 2021. we didn't want to have those passengers miss the community to get out of cars and come by ferry. from alameda and oakland passengers can enjoy a game and special event at the warriors an arena and the beautiful bay. i would like to thank key partners. we do this critically quickly. the golden gate ferry paid for the tow and installation and port crew did all of the improvements you see today. it was a collaboration from three agencies that was very, very quick to get it done and

effective. thank you so much to golden gate and to the warriors for their help and support. i would like to thank my commissioners who are here today. commission president kimberly brandon and gail gilman. thank you for being here. we have other vips. thank you for making this happen. thank you all for being here and celebrating with us the good transportation opportunity that the ferry provides. thank you so much. [applause.] >> thank you, elaine. i know you guys expect to hear a sound because we have a microphone, but in fact this is to help with the new folks so they can get what we say right. i will be a little loud. first of all, i want to thank

assembly member david chou had is advocate for transportation to make it possible for these efforts to take place. i just want to thank everyone who is here and all those who played a role to make sure on day one of the opening of the chase center we didn't hear hardly any complaints. the fact is, you know, it had to do with so many amazing folks from the m.t.a. to the port to the warriors, to so many folks getting the word out to coordinate these efforts in a way that would help make getting here easier on public transit, whether it is by ferry, muni or what have you, and just the

ability to use your ticket as fare for the muni buses is outstanding. i am looking at jack over there. it is wonderful there. great thing to consider for the giants. it worked so much more efficiently. we are blessed to have two amazing teams that draw people from all over the bay area, the san francisco giants and golden state warriors. using water as a mode of transportation is not only amazing but a great ride. it is so relaxing. i want to thank my family in the golden gate bridge board. they have really been great partners with san francisco and with water transit. we are happy to have you all here today to join us. bay area council. thank you, jim wonder man, the

port and warriors and really doing this kind of thing takes a lot of people to make it happen. this is just the temporary location. fingers crossed for the permanent location. we are hoping to get that thing open sooner rather than later. when that happens it is going to be a game changer boaster is going to be right there. who wouldn't want to basically hospital on the ferry to get to a warriors game or go to a concert. the way to time it will be absolutely outstanding. this is the future of san francisco, making it possible to get around easily and to make sure that we are doing good-bye the environment and reducing congestion and making it a great experience. we want people to enjoy themselves when they are trying to get in and out of san

francisco anywhere and this is a great addition to our city. at this time i wanted to give assembly member chou a chance to say a few words. >> thank you for your leade leap to move this forward. shouldn't you all be at work right now? we just took the one major form of public transit in the bay area that does not feel like publickic transit. this is how the transportation experience should be. i am obsessed with water transit. the chronicle says i am smitten. it goes back to five years ago when they called to say have you thought about water transit? about a week later, i ran into this man and he said have you

ever thought about water transit? i then ran into larry from the giants and he said have you thought about water transit. then jim said i need to meet with you to talk about water transit. when i started studying the fact millions of trips were taken every year across the bay on water transit. today you go to sydney, hong kong, new york city, it is all about water transit. this is why working with jim wonder man and labor and my good friend jeff we proposed with collegenal major 3 the doubling of the water transportation system. 3 $00 million for transit.

this stop is really one of the flagship stops for our 21st century bay area water transportation system. this is clean and green. let me close by emphasizing this is the most romantic way to travel. in new york city people go on dates on the ferry system. i don't know about you guys but muni dates are not the way to go. water transit is the way to go. i look forward to seeing you guys on the next ride. [applause.] >> the guy that is going to bring us a world championship -- the guy that is going to make it happen, rick welch. >> thank you, mayor. i just want to run over and hug everybody here. thithis is an an unbelievable

accomplishment. we were thrilled with the mayor said, look, we can make a permanent ferry dock happen at 16th street in 2021. elaine at the port said why do we wait until that happens? a success story is seeing an opportunity and making it happen like this in san francisco. i hope it is recognized. the effort that went into making this happen for the first warrior's preseason game on saturday to the people in the east bay and marin, it is a game changer. david has been there from day one. i am equally smitten with water transportation. to see it come to life in mission bay what this means for every business and resident here is outstanding. thank you, thank you, thank you

for everything you did to make this a reality. thank you. (applause). >> i would like to now introduce the chair of the board, ms. jody breckenridge. >> good morning, it is an exciting day. any day you can be out on the water the on a ferry is a good day. i want to thank you for your support. we love people who are passionate about water transportation but also the active support you offered to us, both of you. i want to thank the board. jim wonder man and jeff with us today. in particular, i want be to thank everyone here involved in this. it is those who spoke before me said this came together quick and in short order. it was worked on yesterday to

finish it up. those working on it are problem solvers and doers. we are ready for the opening of the preseason game. there is a practical application for this. this is part of the emergency response portfolio we have, equipment we have. this is the first time we have had to exercise putting it up to see what that took. we have lessons learned that we will take back to put into both the federal and state plans for the bay to enshould be that should we need this equipment in an emergency we are ready to go and leaning forward so it is a great day and we appreciate everyone being here with us today. thank you. >> that is it. do a nice story because we had a good ride. [applause.]

>> good afternoon, everybody. if i can call this meeting of the sfmta would you please call the roll. [roll call] >> assuming i didn't miss anybody, you have a quorum. items prohibition of sound-producing devices. the ringing of a user cell phone or pagers are prohibited at the meeting. any person responsible for one going off may be asked to leave the room. and cell phone vibrate causing micro p