have special event we're all women that relax and have fun you know everything is friendly and kind we're all equal i'm happy that >> president yee: okay. good afternoon. welcome to the march 17, 2020 regular meet ongoing -- meeting of the san francisco board of supervisors, even though it's not regular. madame clerk, the roll? fewer present. haney present.

mandelman present. mar present. peskin present. preston present. ronen present. safai present. stefani present. walton present. president yee present. all members are present. >> president yee: thank you. would you please join me in the pledge of allegiance. i pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> president yee: so on behalf of the board, i would like to

acknowledge the staff at sfgovtv who record each of the meetings and make the transcripts available to the public online. thank you. madame clerk, any communications? >> none to report, mr. president. >> president yee: thank you. i do want to take this opportunity to share with the public that given the stay-home order issued yesterday by the mayor to reduce the spread of covid-19, the board of supervisors will continue to meet and deliberate on essential action items during this time. members of the public are advised not to leave their homes unless it is essential, however, we recognize that open access to this government body is a basic tenet of democracy and civic

engagement. to the extent possible, we're working on ways to allow for remote public comment during this emergency order. we are in extraordinary times and want to ensure that members of the public are able to engage in the safest way possible. during this emergency we'll -- we may also be moving the board of supervisors' meetings and committee meetings remotely through video conferencing. these meetings will still be streamed online and to the public over sfgovtv. colleagues, we are in this crazy time and would like us to formally decide on these future possibilities once the system is up and running. i would to ask for a motion to allow remote teleconferencing of future board of supervisors'

meeting and remote public comments? can i have a motion? made by ronen and seconded by safai. madame clerk, please call the roll. >> on the motion, mandelman aye. mar aye. peskin aye. preston aye. ronen aye. safai aye. stefani aye. walton aye. yee aye. fewer aye. haney aye. there are 11 ayes. >> president yee: thank you. the motion passes unanimously. thank you, colleagues, and members of the public. as we're still finalizing details of the remote access, please continue to check our

website at www.sfbos.org for updates for future meetings. i want to remind the public we have teleconferencing over this emergency period. we will return to meetings back at the board of supervisors chamber as soon as we feel appropriate to do so. and we look forward to that time when we're back to business as usual. please stay safe and stay home. if you are able to. call 311 if you have any questions or need nonemergency assistance. 311 is for nonemergency. today, we're approving the minutes from february 11, 2020 board meeting. are there any changes to the

meeting minutes? seeing none, can i have a motion to approve the minutes? motion made by supervisor fewer and seconded by supervisor preston. without objection, those minutes will be approved as presented after public comment. colleagues, i want to take a moment to explain several agenda changes we intend to make during this meeting. first, when item 16 is called, the public hearing on the findings and recommendation of law enforcement staffing numbers, i will ask for a motion to continue item 16 to the date of april -- i'll give you the date later, but basically, it's not crucial they present today

even though it would have been a good discussion, but we can wait for that to happen. now, to the purpose of this continuance, circumstances are changing rapidly with the covid-19 disease and the city's response is ever evolving. for item 25, supervisor ronen is requesting this body to meet as a committee of the whole for the public hearing on the city's preparations on response to this health emergency and global pandemic. originally, this public hearing was scheduled for special meeting on thursday, march 19, 2020, but due to the urgent nature of the health emergency, i do not believe it is prudent to wait until thursday to provide important information to

the public and learn the city's response. i'll be asking for a motion to amend item 25 to reflect the public hearing for today's meeting in addition to thursday's meeting. if necessary, to ensure the public can learn information today. further, before the public hearing takes place, i will be introducing an imperative item to call for a closed session to also take place today at 3:00 p.m. the closed session will be to discuss potential threats to the security of or the public access to public buildings, services and public facilities during the local health emergency. with the following department heads reporting. that would be william scott, chief of police, sheriff of the

sheriff's department, chief of the fire department, chief of staff for the mayor's office, city controller, director of human resources, executive director of department of emergency management, director of health for the department of public health, executive director of human services agency, director of department of homelessness and supportive housing, director of san francisco international airport, port of san francisco. as already indicated, after the closed session, the public hearing on city preparation will be called and open to the

public. it is urgent we have an open discussion about policy proposals and responses to the economic health service and housing impacts with respect to the covid-19 health emergency. do any of my colleagues have questions? okay. madame clerk, can you please read the consent agenda. >> items 1 and 2 on consent. if a member objects, an item may be removed and considered separately. >> president yee: anyone want to sever any items? seeing none, madame clerk, i think we already called roll. can we just take this same house, same call? okay. this item is finally passed unanimously. these items. let's go to regular agenda. call items 3-5 together. >> items 3-5 are three

resolutions submitted to the board from the airport commission. for a term of ten years, a minimum annual guarantee of $240,000 for the first year of the lease. item 4, resolution to approve the terminal 3 boarding area f food and beverage kiosk lease between sidewalk juice as tenant and the city acting through the airport commission for a 10-year term and minimum annual guarantee of $136,000. item 5, resolution to approve the terminal 3 boarding area f between elevate, a joint venture and skyview concessions.

>> president yee: same house, same call? without objection, these resolutions are adopted unanimously. please go to item 6. >> resolution to approve and authorize the director of property to lease real property at 1156 valencia street at base represent of 400 -- rent of $400,000 a year to expire february 28, 2023. plus two-year option to extend and authorize the reimbursement of $300,000 toward the cost of lease hold improvements and to execute the documents and make modifications in furtherance of the lease. >> president yee: same house, same call? this is adopted unanimously. >> item 7, resolution to authorize the department of

public health to accept and expend $3 million grant to the tipping point community to participate in a program entitled hphh, tipping point. to create new psychiatric respite center beginning january 16, 2020 through january 15, 2022. >> president yee: colleagues, same house, same call? without objection, this resolution is adopted unanimously. let's go to item number 8. >> item 8 is resolution to authorize the san francisco police department to accept and expend $66,000 grant from the state of department parks and recreation to procure equipment and gear for the period of november -- period to commence following board approval through november 30, 2020.

>> president yee: same house, same call. adopted unanimously. >> resolution to provide revenue bonds for the financing and accusation of 108 multifamily rental using product consisting of three structures. >> president yee: colleagues, can we take this same house, same call? without objection, this resolution is adopted unanimously. madame clerk, let's go to next item. >> item 10, resolution to approve and authorize the execution of loan agreement with mission housing development corp, california limited partnership in an amount not to exceed $28 million.

>> president yee: colleagues, can we take this same house, same call? without objection, this is adopted. item 11. >> item 11 resolution to urge the administrative staff of the department of public health to include frontline registered nurses and physicians in their decision-making process to implement to the extent possible an expedited hiring process to less than 90 days of application, to see staffing requirements with contracted registered nurses by implementing a ceiling of 5% or less. and to provide annual violence prevention and disaster preparedness training. >> president yee: same house, same call? without objection, this resolution is adopted unanimously. >> item 12 is ordinance to amend the police code to make existing

exemption to paid parental leave ordinance for employers with fully paid family leave policies consistent with recent changes to state law. >> president yee: colleagues, can we take this same house, same call? without objection, this ordinance is passed on first reading. >> item 13, ordinance to amend the administrative code to require that mayoral and board of supervisors appointments to re-entry council expire following a member's hiring. and to require that the fifth officer be a formally incarcerated member and to increase the number of 12 to 13, the number of members that constitute a quorum? >> president yee: same house, same call? this ordinance is passed on first reading unanimously. >> item 14, motion to approve the treasurer's nomination of meagan wallace to the oversight

committee for term ending june 17, 2022. >> president yee: same house, same call? without objection, this is approvedly. >> item 15, a motion to appoint janice petty to the commission on the aging advisory council for term ending march 31, 2022. >> president yee: same house, same call? without objection, this motion is approved unanimoussy. -- unanimously. >> president yee: madame clerk, even though it's not quite 2:30 there is nothing to discuss to continue an item. could we take it right now before the time set?

>> clerk: no, mr. president, but we could go to roll call for introductions. >> mandelman submits. mar? >> supervisor mar: thank you, madame clerk. colleagues, i have one resolution i'm introducing today that relates to the topic of the day. san francisco has led the nation as the first place to enact mandatory paid sick leave as well as family friendly workplace and paid parental laws. these were ground breaking, but they were not designed with public health emergencies in mind. san francisco must lead once again to ensure that everyone is economically healthy as well as physically healthy and workers can afford to shelter in place. the emergency expansion of paid sick leave announced by mayor breed yesterday is a positive step forward, but it's not enough to leave it up to the employers to decide.

over the weekend, the house of representatives adopted a comprehensive coronavirus relief bill that includes expanded paid leave, but shockingly, it exempts the largest employers who represent 54% of the workforce. the largest corporations don't need a bailout. workers do. we need all hands on deck from washington to sacramento to city hall to ensure our workers are taken care of. so today i'm introducing a resolution along with supervisor haney urging action to expand access to paid leave during public health emergencies. we need to make sure workers know what rights they have and that those rights are enforced and protected. some will have accrued paid sick leave they can use under san francisco's paid sick leave ordinance and some will be eligible for unemployment insurance, but not all employees know their rights or how to access the benefits.

so this resolution calls for the creation of a multilingual workers right hot line so everyone can access the information and rapid enforcement action to know their rights and protect them. we need to expand workers rights where they feel to meet the urgency of our current crisis. under the law today, there is no assurance that workers who must stay home will be paid. under the law today, non-traditional workers, domestic workers, laborers and undocumented workers do not have access to safety net programs like unemployment insurance. under the law today, nearly one quarter of the united states workers receive no form of paid sick leave. so this resolution urges the united states congress to mandate that all employers provide their employees with additional 14 days of paid leave during public health emergencies. with public funds provided to

make it possible for small and medium-sized businesses to comply. and it further urges action by congress to the governor and state legislature to meet our current needs. with this resolution, we will support bills on the state and federal level that would move us toward these needs and commit to act locally to fill gaps where state and federal action falls short. the rest i submit. >> clerk: thank you. supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: i've got one in memoriam that i submitted and in the interest of time will submit the rest. >> president yee: supervisor ronen skipped? >> no, i'm after preston. i don't know how that happened. i'm sorry. >> thank you. supervisor preston?

>> supervisor preston: thank you, madame clerk. colleagues, i have several items today and just wanted to start by thanking deputy city attorney for moving very, very quickly on these items. i greatly appreciate it with everything going on. i appreciate the quick turnaround. so, first, i am introducing a resolution calling on the governor, the courts, and the mayor to immediately suspend all eviction activity, except evictions necessary to protect for safety. i'm sad to report as i speak today, eviction notices are still being served in san francisco and eviction cases of our residents are still moving forward in our courts. this is absolutely the last thing we need right now. to quickly recap where we are in

residential evictions, there has been a lot of discussion and activity. i introduced an ordinance last week to ban nonpayment evictions arising the crisis. the mayor and i had an opportunity to meet and she issued a directive against nonpayment evictions from covid-related loss of income. this was an important step. it's a start, but unfortunately, it's not enough. i urged mayor to broaden her directive to create a real eviction moratorium that is comprehensive and includes no fault evictions. barring action on that, we'll continue to move forward with the ordinance i introduced last week, tailored to make sure we address no fault evictions. i want to thank the mayor's office for her work on these

issues. sophia kitler. the san francisco superior court has given at best a mixed message. the court changed its website in a way that suggested that all jury trials, including eviction cases would be continued and delayed for 90 days, but tenant attorneys are told it's business as usual and eviction cases are proceeding in the courts. people obviously cannot shelter in place if they're having to show up and defend themselves from eviction, so i call on the san francisco superior court and state judicial council to make sure these cases are postponed and wanted to thank the folks at the eviction defense collaborative for bringing this to our attention. the governor has weighed in with an executive order as you know, yesterday, this was an important step forward. i'd like to thank the governor for this action and in particular the ordinance lays out the stakes and why keeping

people housed is so critically important. however, like the mayor's directive, the governor's executive order addresses nonpayment arising from loss of income and does not address other types of eviction, so our resolution urges further action from the governor. colleagues, i've seen a lot of good from folks in the last week with outpouring of neighbors reaching out. some of those include landlords in my district, but, unfortunately, there are those who seem to lack the most basic compassion at this time and it's to deal with them that we must take the actions at all level of government to stop evictions during this crisis. i want to thank my cosponsor on this resolution, supervisors ronen, haney, mar and fewer, and look forward to working with you all to pass this resolution as quickly as possible.

second, i'm introducing an emergency ordinance to protect small businesses from eviction due to nonpayment of rent arising from covid-19 measures. i want to thank my colleague supervisor ronen, who i've been working with closely on this issue for more than a week and we've been trying to find a way around state law limitations and fortunately, some of those were lifted yesterday by the governor. even before this public health crisis we heard daily from small businesses worried about making rent and the current health crisis has made those fears more intense and immediate. and many businesses are wondering if they'll ever financially be able to reopen. with april 1st approaching, many are concerned about paying the rent when the revenues have been reduced and in many cases complete completely eliminated as most

businesses have been shut down. the fear eviction and default is real and growing. we need to make sure help is coming from the many levels of government. locally, the private sector. small businesses, as we know, are the life blood of our local economy and define our neighborhoods. so thanks to the executive order issued by the governor. yesterday, we were freed from some of the limits that normally restrict our ability to take action around rents and evictions when it comes to small businesses. so to make sure that businesses are not displaced and permanently closed during this state of emergency, and after the state of emergency, i'm introducing an eviction ordinance covering small businesses, the first of its kind in any municipality in california. i want to recognize in addition to deputy city attorney,

business leaders, including kristin evans and the fillmore merchant association and the small business commission for their advice and counsel on this measure and for their advocacy. i understand from a press release that i received while walking into the chambers today that the mayor has announced an intention to move in a similar way around to prevent small business evictions. i welcome learning the details of the proposal which we haven't seen to date. and finally, with apologies for the long roll call for introductions, there are others we will submit on, but one other, which is that as we urge everyone to shelter in place, we obviously have many who have no shelter. even as units sit vacant across the city that could be housing folks that are vulnerable.

one such property that is vacant in my district is 555 fulton street, which many of you will sound familiar to you, because it's been at the center of the ongoing corruption investigation in the federal -- the criminal complaint. what a lot of folks don't know about 555 fulton, it's a vacant, 139-unit building sitting there, turnkey ready, with permissions for folks to reside there. we have a family sleeping on mats on a floor, kicked out, despite our shelter in place, they're kicked out each day in the morning to fend for themselves for the day. and we also know a considerable number of the people who are most at risk right now in our homeless are seniors.

we need to house these folks in order to prevent the spread of coronavirus. i think the property at 555 fulton presents an opportunity to help meet this need. that's why i issued a letter to the owners of the property urging them to use these available units for temporary housing for homeless families and seniors. and given the severity of the crisis and the importance of the shelter in place directive, units that have not been committed to buyers should be made available for temporary occupants. i want to assure all with vacant units, now is the time to step up and contact your district supervisor and make these units available for temporary occupancy. as a remind der, san francisco has a good samaritan law, so if you provide temporary housing

you're not necessarily making a long-term commitment to house folks indefinitely. we'll need all the units in the days and weeks ahead. thank you. the rest i submit. >> supervisor ronen: yes, thank you, colleagues. and first i just wanted to thank every city leader and member of our departments who have been working around the clock on this crisis and to protect as many people as possible. your work is amazing and i wanted to appreciate each and every one of you. i speechly wanted to -- especially wanted to thank my colleague, dean preston, never been so happy to have a leading tenant rights attorney on the board of supervisors as i am right now, the ability to write your own legislation with the help of the city attorney office in this matter has been incredible and i really appreciate the work that you've

done to stop evictions, not just nonpayment, but no fault evictions of resident and commercial businesses. thank you so much. it's been a joy to work with you. thank you on that. and towards that end, supervisor preston and i, together with supervisor haney have also been working on a small business rent stabilization loan program for the city and county of san francisco which would help to stop the irreversible loss of small businesses due to the coronavirus public health emergency. because of restrictions on travel and gatherings, patronage has decreased to small businesses substantially, putting tens of thousands of small businesses and hundreds of thousands of workers at risk. it has businesses scrambling to

see how to stay afloat. some businesses won't survive without us. they need our help and need it now. the state and local officials are working to open the way for supervisor preston to introduce the legislation he just announced preventing small businesses from being evicted. there are now some immediate resources on the way for shop owners. and it is an essential, but businesses will need more than a stopgap moratorium. they will need replacement income to pay rent the minute that moratorium is lifted. and honestly, it is discouraging that our state lawmakers have passed a $1.1 billion measure that includes nothing for individuals and small businesses. and then they suspend the legislature for four weeks. i want to interlude to say that i'm proud of us, colleagues, for

continuing to work nonstop during this crisis. it did shock me to read this morning that the state legislature has recessed until april 13th. i've been depending on the legislature to pass several laws and for us to fill in those gaps, but now it appears that -- it's hard to defend that we may be the only game in town for a little while. that has upped my urgency when it comes to the workers that supervisor mar just listed that are left out of state and federal programs. it's incumbent upon us more than ever to lead the way here. so this rent stabilization loan and whatever is coming on behalf of independent contractors and immigrant workers is at the forefront of my mind. i also wanted to thank supervisor mar for taking such a lead in the area, especially

with jobs of justice, which is an organization that works with workers that earn money in non-traditional ways and are in the low age workforce. i wanted to mention that the federal business administration has declared a disaster in the bay area, while impressed with speaker pelosi's ability to broker an agreement for action, it doesn't go far enough. that's why this rent stabilization at the local level is needed. this will open the door for larger economic injury disaster loans, but everything i've heard about the small business administration at the federal level, it will take a long time to get it up and running. and it may be very hard for small businesses to access. and it may be impossible for many to apply.

these loans in cases -- in many cases will have to be secured and will require a level of proof and documentation and bureaucracy that many of our small businesses will not be able to get through. so my legislation is intended to respond to the urgency that our small businesses face right now. i've been working with the treasurer's office to move quickly to create a $20 million small business rent stabilization program. i'm introducing the ordinance authorizing the city to secure a line of credit and accompanying ordinance creating the funds. the city will provide no interest loans to cover three months of rent, mortgage or other fixed operating costs with no payment due to the city for 12 months. i have heard some comments that

$1.1 million gross receipt threshold is too low. and i'm really open to feedback on this issue. we can change that amount at committee without expanding the time for us to pass this ordinance. this will help businesses hold on through the immediate month ahead and will pair well with the federal and state help. the treasurer has included a generous estimate of $600,000 to cost the total cost of the program, $300,000 for staffing. current interest rates are expected to cost $250,000, but the appropriation will accommodate $300,000 just in case. because these are no-interest loans, this will be the city covering the interest rates from the bank. again i wanted to thank supervisor preston and haney. i am asking and have asked

president yee to waive the 30-day hold. ideally, i'd like to hold the committee this week or next and get this before us at next tuesday's board meeting. as the covid-19 crisis evolves, we want to send a message loud and clear, san francisco small businesses and employees, we've got your back and you're not alone. the second item i'm introducing is a resolution together with supervisor mandelman. we have a constituent who often talks to both of us when she reaches out -- she's my constituent. catherine kuszczak, thank you for the suggestion. she reach out urging us to enter

a resolution and talk to grocery stores, hours or time periods where only those that are strictly sheltering in place, but need to access groceries can have time where they're not going to have contact with people who have not been sheltering in place to get those groceries. so we're introducing a resolution today in order to urge those stores that are considered essential to have senior-only and immuno-compromised only shopping hours. we will send that to the organization and as many essential business groupings that we can find and we'll be asking the mayor to include this official petition on behalf of the city. once it passes on outreach that

the city is doing for coronavirus. with that, the rest i will submit. >> clerk: thank you. supervisor safai? >> supervisor safai: thank you, madame clerk. i have one item. it's part of the conversation that is happening at the national level. i think it's many of the things we're hearing about on the national level are emanating from the local level because we're the ones dealing with this on a daily basis and have the most interaction. so some of the things you've talked about in terms of eviction defense, i know last week we introduced resolution on banks, moratorium, utilities, moratorium, so people wouldn't get their services shut off, we need to do more to put pressure on the banks. i think that is coming. i think there is a time when people are not going to be able to pay their mortgages as well as their rent. what i'm calling for today, a conversation is happening at the national level, but it's essentially a resolution urging

the united states congress and the executive branch to enact an economic stimulus package that relates to the coronavirus, giving every american and adult $5,000 for every 30-day period that this national emergency stays in effect. they need to survive. without income, because they've been asked to stay home, they won't be able to do that. here in the chamber, we're deemed essential employees. our salaries ill continue. there are certainly salaries that will continue. when you're talking about janito janitors, hotel workers, small businesses and all of us and the mayor have talked about, so many people will not be able to go to work. without going to worker they're not going to receive a paycheck. and without a pay check, how are

they going to survive? i've been talking with and working with janitors on a daily basis and working with their leadership. we've been talking to hotel workers, those in the tourist industry. i know that the tourist industry as well as the hotels have been talking with supervisor peskin and the mayor's office how we might be able to change many of these hotels into shelter in place for those who need it, for the need of quarantining and how are those buildings and all those places being cleaned by hotel workers and janitors and so on. so this is important aspect. there is a conversation that will come -- hopefully sooner rather than later -- once there is immunization, that immunization will be free to every american in the united states or any individual living in the united states and there would be a robust paid leave, sick leave package.

anyway, i don't know if we'll be able to vote on this at a certain time. i would ask the president to waive the rule, but we wanted to get in on the record so we could have this conversation and push -- we happen to have the luxury of having speaker of the house represent san francisco, so hopefully this package will be talked about. hopefully they'll be expanding it beyond a $1,000 check to every american and increasing it to a point where it's usable, particularly in the bay area. just also wanted to say, i've been monitoring all my colleague's work they've been doing in terms of getting information out. i want to appreciate all the hard work that every one of have done contacting your constituencies, contacting your providers, getting the information out as quickly as you can. it's helpful, because we're all able to feed off of one another, the mayor and her team, the clerk included. all of us out here doing our

job. something i might have missed, maybe supervisor peskin and his team are dealing with, or whoever it might be, but it's been helpful to have the information on social media and the way you're getting it so quickly to constituency. thank you, mr. president, and the rest i submit. >> clerk: president yee? >> president yee: i have two imperative agenda items today. the first is motion to convene in closed session today at 3:00 p.m. to discuss the potential threats to public services and facilities which i discussed previously. this an important meeting given the sensitive nature of emergency we're in. and i want to thank several of

you that have brought this up. in particular, supervisor peskin for really putting a lot of meat into the thought of why we should do this and how we're going to do this. the second is demotion to concur with the mayor's supplements due to the proclamation declaring an existence of a local emergency that were issued on march 11, 2020 and march 13, 2020. these include important orders that allow for deadlines to be suspended during the emergency and allows bodies such as the board of supervisors the ability to attend meetings remotely. these supplements to the emergency order need to be ratified by the board in seven days. as such, i hope we can approve this motion later today.

the rest i submit. >> clerk: thank you. supervisor fewer? >> supervisor fewer: thank you. colleagues, today i am introducing a resolution that calls for every san francisco resident to step up and do their part to help stop the spread of the coronavirus and help each other during this crisis. these are unprecedented times and unprecedented times calls for unprecedented actions. according to the "new york times" today, drawing on a scientific report, without action of individuals to suppress new cases, 2.2 million people in the united states could die. we're all needed to step up and fight this crisis. today, i'm calling on residents, elected officials, and community-based organizations to join forces to unite and protect our communities. this is something everyone can and should do. the treasurer office was in the

news discussing her experience in italy during the outbreak. she made a good point. people here have been focusing on the economic impacts of this crisis which is obviously important to all of us, but our top priority at this time must be to contain the virus and preserve human life. i'm introducing a city-wide callout for every san francisco resident to step up. i'm asking for every supervisor's office to take leadership to ensure in their districts there is a streamlined conduit for accurate up-to-date information to reduce calls to 311 and public health. i'm also asking them to coordinate volunteer efforts in the community to assist with community-based organizations, food delivery, distribution, food preparation, supporting small businesses and checking in on neighbors and friends. i'm asking the department of

disability to expedite the volunteer screening process, to get more volunteers to the food and delivery service. i am asking for everyone to do your part. if you're able bodied, help unload groceries and package them. if you have a car, bicycle, scooter, help deliver a meal. if you're homebound, call a friend who is vulnerable to check in with them. or join a phone tree to check in on isolated seniors. if you want to support small businesses in your neighborhood, buy them from online. make a donation to the san francisco food bank. do something. if you are sick, stay home. if you think you have been exposed, stay home. follow public health mandates. take this seriously. being a san franciscan means something. yes, we are complicated, we are also compassionate. we care and when we need to, we

step up. this is our strength and the core of who we are. we can do this. in doing so, we can save lives and show the rest of the country how absolutely fabulous we are. today, i am also introducing a resolution that calls on governor newsom to if have a moratorium on small businesses and follow new york's need by allowing on sale to sell alcohol. this pandemic will have a listing effect on our economy for years to come. we must do everything we can to help our small businesses stay open during this unprecedented time. especially our corner stores and small grocers who provide crucial access to food and other

resources. for hundreds of thousands of residents in the city. a moratorium on fees would provide overdue relief for small businesses struggling to weather this storm. the governor should also take action to temporarily alter state alcohol licensing policy by allowing bars and restaurants with on sale alcohol licenses to sell food and alcohol for o offsale. by allowing our bars to sell alcohol along with food, we can provide immediate substantial lifeline, hopefully preventing closures. to be clear, this policy change would only apply to purchases that include food as alcohol alone is not an essential service. new york has already taken the step to allow residents to order in from their favorite restaurants, bars, wineries and other establishments. california should follow before it's too late for small businesses.

by urging the authority to make this small change to our state alcohol licensing laws, the governor could save treasured institutions across the city and help ensure greater access to food delivery at a time when social distancing is an imperative to public health. finally, colleagues, i want to make a couple of other comments as each and every day we learn more about the ripple effects related to covid-19 crisis in our necessary efforts to spread the illness. today i'm reminding everyone that during this busy time it is also the time to fill out the united states census. the census happens only once every ten years and it's important everyone fills it out. the remain in place order, all outreach has been suspended, so

we're asking people to go online and fill out the census information. it gives us an accurate account about our population. some of the top census funded social services in san francisco are children and education, transportation and infrastructure, and housing. i just completed the census myself after receiving my notification to participate in the census last week. i urge everyone to do the same. it only takes a few minutes and it is online at finally as budget chair, the economic impacts are likely to be staggering while the mayor and board are looking at ways to support small businesses and families, we'll see a big impact on city revenues. more discussions to the city's

economy and the city's budget will progress in the coming weeks, but i just want to note as others have, this city truly needs leadership from the state and federal government to help provide relief. locally, we will need to rethink our approach to the budget process. my office will be working with the budget committee members, departments and mayor's office to discuss possible changes and share updates as soon as possible. thank you. the rest i submit. >> clerk: thank you. supervisor preston? >> supervisor preston: apologizies, i forgot to request to waive the 30-day rule to emergency ordinance as related to evictions. >> no you did, you said it. >> president yee: before supervisor haney, i'm getting texts from my staff who i

usually have to listen to. my staff is pointing out that we are not practicing good social distancing, so i'm going to recommend that the end people stay at their desk for now and the middle person stay in the desk and the other two back up so you're six feet away. so like supervisor mandelman, could you back up a little bit? thank you, i don't want to get in trouble with my staff. >> thank you, president yee. i also just want to acknowledge all of the work that everybody has been doing and to thank everybody for their leadership at this time for all of you who are here as well as the mayor and her staff. i know everybody is working harder than ever during the time of this crisis and so i want to appreciate everybody. i have a few resolutions i want

to speak a couple of other issues that other folks introduced. the first is i'm costate-sponsoring resolution with supervisor mar closing the gaps that exist on paid sick leave and other types of leave that individuals, workers, need to be able to access right now. in these times of great need, we want to make sure that our workers know that we support them and currently california law and san francisco law does not include sufficient provis n provisions for the health crisis we're facing. we want to change those laws at the federal and state level. business 6 has a high concentration of businesses, hotels, bars, cafes, arts, and like many of you, i've been

hearing about the challenges they're facing. supervisor mar and i introduced a resolution that calls for the support of a number of bills that can help to provide needed leave and relief at this time. the first is the family first coronavirus response act, h.r.6201 which was recently passed by the u.s. house of representatives. as written, the bill would amend the family and medical leave act and expand needs related to the coronavirus, but it exempt large employers with 500 or more employees. we're asking that the act be amended to apply to all companies, including those with 500 or more employees. we call on governor newsom and the california legislature to address gaps in financial support or paid leave for workers ordered to stay home. there is a bill, ab3123 that

protects workers from retaliation when they take leave during public health emergencies like the epidemic. they can use their earned sick leave if their place is ordered close, or if the employee is providing care or assistance to their child whose school or child care provider is closed by order. under this proposed bill, if an employee is complying with an order issued by public official, ab3123 states that employer may not discharge or retaliate against that employee. we also want all of the effected workers to access information, so the resolution calls for oawd to jointly create a multilingual hot line for san francisco workers to access information and rapid enforcement actions to protect the rights and benefits

to eliminate language barriers. we know that the health of our residents comes first and in order for folks to be certain they're safe and secure in following the health orders, whether that is any individual resident but especially low wage workers in the heavily impacted service industry, hospitality, tourism, folks who are already having a hard time struggling in one of the most expensive cities in the world, this is especially trying time for them and we have to make sure that our laws reflect the needs of our workers right now. we are also looking at the ways to close the gaps here locally and our own paid sick leave laws. secondly, i'm introducing a resolution in support of emergency earned income tax credit which would provide a tax relief check between $1,000 and

$6,000 to every american who earned less than $65,000 last year. as supervisor safai spoke about, it's critical that we call on federal and state government to step up. the level of need and impact is far beyond what we could provide on our own. there would be more than 200 million american workers who would qualify for the tax relief and we have to prioritize the needs of our workers as events are cancelled, work hours cut and they're laid off. the goal of the earned income tax credit, within three weeks, 200 million americans would receive tax relief checks followed by monthly payments through the end of 2020. in our city, many that employ working class people will have a significant climb in their consumer base. we have a hotel occupancy rate that has plummeted from 80% to

20% over the course of just one week. the proposal would serve independent contractors and hourly gig workers by providing a refundable tax credit, equal to 100% of family leave wages by employer. i know many of us are concerned about the fact that there are many independent contractors, gig workers, ride-share drivers, who are not going to be able to access the same level of unemployment, don't have access to paid sick leave and other things that can protect them during this time. so across the board earned income tax credit that would come in the form of a check immediately to families would alleviate the devastating impacts that people are feeling right now. this is one of the things i think the federal government can do to assist us during this time. i want to speak in support of two of the measures that were

introduced by me colleagues, supervisors preston and ronen. i know many of us have heard extensively from small businesses in our districts, folks who are having to shut their doors because of the prohibition on certain types of businesses being open. dramatic loss of revenue, fear they have to lay folks off and can't pay their rent so i'm really excited to be cosponsoring the two ordinances, one that would offer this small business loan program for businesses. many folks need urgent injection of cash. this would provide that. and also giving them the same assurance we've given residents, which is not have the fear of eviction over their head. these are two important things. i've also reached out to sfmta and am going to engage with their board about some of the questions around enforcement and

fee enforcement locally. and we'll be putting something forward around that to make sure that during this time we're not putting excessive and unnecessary burdens on our residents because of either tickets or fees that can add up and create unnecessary burdens making it difficult for them to abide by the health measures as well. the rest i submit. >> clerk: supervisor ronen? mr. president. that concludes the introduction of new business. >> president yee: i see there is probably going to be public comment short, so i won't divide it up, because there are items we need to hear since it's about already past 3:00. i'll take public comment on -- general public comment.

go ahead, sir. >> 36,000 people died last year of the flu. 50 have died of the chinese wuhan virus. why isn't somebody saying this? and fewer are believing the democrats, honestly. this is nothing more than a new russian collusion hoax by the democrats. that is exactly what it is. and nobody here is saying anything because you hate trump, you hate america, and that's your goal, okay? that's your goal. 36,000 died of the flu last year. we've had 50 so far. that's how many get hit by lightning. that's how many are eaten by sharks totally every year. having said that, i am asking

people to read luke 21 for an hour, nothing but luke 21 for an hour, do mark 13 for an hour, and then matthew 24 for an ohou. thinks the longest discourse that christ gave. it answers two questions. question number one, when is the temple going to be destroyed? and number two, when are you going to return? jesus said this, there will be signs in the sun, moon and stars and upon the earth there will be distress of nations with -- the sea and the waves roaring, men fails them for fear of looking after those things which are coming upon the earth. two years ago we had a total solar eclipse, think about that, coast to coast. the last time that happened is 1776. it's true 99 years before the one we just had, we had a coast to coast, but that was not only

in the water. this was only in the water. this is a sign. and it's still not too late -- [bell ringing] >> president yee: any other speaker? >> president yee: madame clerk, any callers on the line? >> i believe there is one, mr. president. >> president yee: let's make it happen. >> i'm on the phone ready to make public comment at the board of supervisors. >> please proceed. >> just one moment, i'll start my timer here for my two minutes. and here we go for two minutes. hello, my name is michael. i'm a public advocate for the

city. first of all, thank you for taking remote public comment. i ask that you in the future have public comment at a fixed time for every meeting at the start of the meeting, take 15 minutes of public comment so the public knows when to call in to make public comment. that is how berkley and oakland city councils deal with general public comment. my next item is every supervisor i am asking you to hold regular virtual town hall meetings about the coronavirus epidemic. please start using zoom for regular virtual town halls. my next item is, i'm calling on every member of the board of sups on the d triple c to

immediately resign. supervisors, you have one job, protect the city from the coronavirus. supervisors cannot moonlight with a second job. you need to pass a law that prevents supervisors from doing any other job but being a member of the board. finally, i'm asking every district business organization -- [bell ringing] -- to set up senior citizen shopping hours. i'm a senior citizen with aids. i need to know there is a special time in the morning for me and my husband to safely go shopping at stores in the castro. again, please set up seniors shopping hours in your districts so we can take care of our supplies. thank you very much. [bell ringing] >> president yee: any other

public comment? seeing none, the public comment is now closed. >> madame clerk, at this time it's past 3:00, i would like to call item 27 out of order. >> the board convene in closed session to consult with various department heads, police chief, fire chief, chief of staff, the director of the department of human resources to discuss the potential threats to the security or the public access to public buildings during the

local health emergency regarding the novel coronavirus disease, covid-19. >> president yee: we have an imperative item which requires the board to adopt two separate findings by eight votes before unanimously adopting the item itself. let's take the sunshine ordinance finding first. is there a motion that finds this resolution is imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest and thus meeting the standards of the sunshine ordinance made by supervisor peskin seconded by supervisor walton. without objection, this finding is accepted. now, to the brown act finding. is there a motion that finds that the need to take action came to the attention of the board after the agenda was posted and thus, the motion meets a standard of the brown, motion made by supervisor

peskin, seconded by supervisor stefani. without objection, this is accepted. we already had public comment on this item or we have general public comment. is there any -- >> mr. president, just caution, please call for public comment on the imperative motion? >> president yee: sure. we'll take public comment on this item. is there any member that wishes to speak on the imperative item. seeing none, then public comment is now closed. now, on the substance of the imperative motion itself, a roll call vote. madame clerk. >> mandelman aye. mar aye. peskin aye.

preston aye. ronen aye. safai aye. stefani aye. walton aye. yee aye. fewer aye. haney aye. there are 11 ayes. >> president yee: okay. then without objection, this motion is approved. so now we will be moving into closed session, so i ask the public to leave the room and -- --. . ... >> president yee: so the public is still welcome i guess. we have another imperative item

i forgot. i don't know i guess i'm supposed to do something? madame clerk, call item 25. >> >> clerk: item 25 motion directing the clerk of the board of supervisors to schedule a committee of the whole hearing on march 19, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. for members of the board of supervisors to convene and departments to report regarding city preparations in response to the covid-19 health emergency. >> president yee: i'm totally

confused. this is not on there. i understand there are amendments that would like to be introduced by supervisor ronen. are you ready? >> supervisor ronen: i'd like to amend item 25 to replace march 19 with march 17. >> second. >> president yee: motion made by supervisor ronen and seconded by supervisor preston. i don't think this is an imperative item. that's why it's so confusing. there has been a motion made and can we take this without

objection? then motion passes. >> mr. president, i'm assuming the time doesn't matter, it says 11:00, should i strike the 11:00 a.m. as well. >> supervisor ronen: i'd like to do an additional motion to strike 11:00 a.m. >> president yee: okay. >> as the seconder, basically the thursday meeting is being supplanted by today's meeting. i maintain my second on the second motion. >> president yee: okay. any objection? without objection, the motion carries. i'm sorry. this is really confusing, so bear with me, folks. i'm supposed to take 3:00 imperative item 27 first, then we come back to the items.

got it. all right. colleagues, now i have to ask the public to leave if there is any more public members in here. all right. sheriffs? >> are we set? colleagues, we are now back in

open session for the board. may i have a motion that the board finds that it is in the best interest of the public that the board elect not to disclose this clos closed sessions deliberations. a motion, please. made by supervisor stefani. can i have a second? supervisor preston. if there's no objection then the motion shall pass. madam clerk, let's go to item 26. 25. >> clerk: 25. item 25 motion to direct the clerk of the board of supervisors to schedule a committee of the whole hearing today for members of the board of supervisors to convene and for departments to report regarding city preparations in response to the covid-19 health

emergency. >> president yee: supervisor ronen my apologies in public that we went long, but we will get something out of this. go ahead. >> thank you so much. colleagues, i want to thank you -- and to all of the departments that are still left, which a few of you, but i appreciate that you have been here for so long when you have so much work that you've been doing non-stop. but the reason that i called this committee of the whole was because we have a lo law in california called the brown act. which is really important to ensure the government accountability and transparency. but it has made it extremely difficult for all 11 supervisors to talk to one another and to talk at the same time to our department staff. and as a result many of the departments that have been

working non-stop are getting 11 phone calls asking the same question and having to report the same thing. that seemed like it made no sense to me whatsoever. that at the same time the public deserves to hear what's going on from the department and the board of supervisors should be working as much as possible in a coordinated fashion. so i asked -- i introduced this item so that we could have that conversation. unfortunately, we had a closed session before this that lasted a lot longer than any of us anticipated. and so we're not going to have that much time today for this open session. but i know that many -- myself and many of my colleagues have burning questions for some of our departments that we're going to ask today. and then most importantly once all of the departments leave it's an opportunity in public for all 11 of us on the board of supervisors to have a conversation about what it is

that we're working on and how we're talking to our districts so we can get ideas from one another and so that we're not doubling up on work, that we can join forces and make sure that we're maximizing our limited time during this crisis. so for the departments that are still here, i wanted to call you up and to just ask you if you're working on or developing any sort of program or precaution that you have not yet publicly announced so that we know that's in the works and can be collaborating with you. because we know that there is many holes in what we need to do as a city to make sure that we're helping every single resident through this. so if we can call up first trent warr from the department of human services -- because he has to leave soon. and then mary ellen carol from

the department of emergency management. if there's anything, thank you so much for sticking around, that you have not yet announced to the public that you're working on, including what you told us about in closed session. if you could announce that so it's public information, we would appreciate it. >> thank you, supervisor ronen. the director of human services agency. we did announce to our -- to the 250,000 or so clients who received services from h.s.a. as well as community partners that we closed all of our client service centers to the public as of friday at 5:00 p.m.. our benefits, should there be any issues with the current benefits, should folks need to apply for benefits, meaning cash assistance, cal fresh, formerly called food stamps or medi-cal we're available online and via

the phone. our service centers are still operating with essential staff who are doing their work from home. but, still available. and we do have staff on-site for the follow in-person needs. replacement of your medi-cal card or e.b.t. card to access health care and food, and emergency housing vouchers and emergency food boxes and any other issue that may come up that can't be dealt with over the phone. as well as for clients who don't do internet access and they can do anythingal those service centers. so we haven't announced all of that. and we have suspended all of our welfare to work activities, sort of doesn't make a whole lot of sense to be helping people to look for jobs right now. so we closed that service to the public. i could go into our care in shelter plans now city-wide if

you'd like, supervisor. that sort of concludes the human services specific information. >> sure, if you could explain to the public what you explained to us in closed session. >> yeah, i'd be happy to. so the human services agency per the city's emergency operations plan is charged with providing care and shelter for the residents of san francisco in the case of a natural -- a case of a disaster, any sort of disaster. in this case we activated our department's operation center a week ago monday because it was very clear at that point that this virus was moving much quicker and much broader than we had anticipated. our housing response is for the following populations -- primarily populations who need to be quarantined because they've been exposed to the virus or they need to be isolated because they have tested positive for the virus. and they do not have a means,

given their current housing situation, to quarantine on their own, to self-quarantine. so who is that population? that is the 19,000 or so individuals who live in single occupancy hotels with shared bathrooms on each floor and shared -- often shared kitchen or eating facilities. these are both privately owned s.r.o.s as well as publicly leased or operated by non-profits. so that's 19,000 or so people. and the other population that can't self-quarantine is, of course, our homeless population. and the numbers, you know, always elusive and we're operating around 10,000 for that. and this includes both homeless individuals who may be on the streets as well as our homeless individuals and families in the shelters and navigation centers and the like. now very, very difficult, of course, to predict onset rates. not only in terms of pace, but

in terms of numbers. in consultation with the department of public health, epidemiologists and the director, and the target that we laid out last week was 3,500 units. the units we're looking for would be units that are going to self-quarantine, they have their own bathroom and we have the ability to bring them food and the ability to provide services on-site should we need that. the 3500 is broken down as follows, about 2,500 for individuals who need to self-quarantine and about 1,000 for individuals who need to be isolated. the difference between, again, quarantine and isolation -- quarantine is someone who has been exposed but not tested positive. or someone awaiting a test. and isolated is someone who has been confirmed. and the reason that we operate separate those two because the room characteristics and the needs are different depending on that population.

so, so far the population that we need to address immediately, meaning they are in the hospital now and need to get an alternative place to be are homeless individuals who are awaiting test results. it's only a handful. and at this point the hospitals are either at green or yellow and they're not taking up bed space that we need for others. however, that number will grow. and so we have secured 86 units, i believe -- yes, 86 units, that we have right now to begin moving those folks from the hospitals into those units. no one has moved yet and that needs to be in consultation with the health side of the house. in addition we have identified an additional 508 units at six different hotels throughout the city and we're currently in purchase/rent/lease negotiations with them as well as setting up staffing plans, feeding plans, etc. and that would bring the total

number of units -- i keep saying units, it's generally hotel rooms -- to 594. we hope to have it secured for our use by the end of this week. we're confident that that number is sufficient for the public health needs. we, however, are not stopping there and we're continuing to deploy our staff and others to assess hotels that have now come forward to us. just in last hour sitting in the closed session, five hotels totaling over a thousand rooms were brought to my attention and my staff will be following up on the next day or two. and, unfortunately, for our hotel industry and most particularly our workers prenomnantly who are facing layoffs and the loss of money to the hotels, they seem very eager

to partner with us on this. so we're -- i am confident that we will have enough rooms for the health population -- or the population that needs it through the department of public health's intervention. if i could talk a little broader, so we prioritize as i said individuals who need to be quarantined and isolated per public health orders. the second population, we are setting up alternative shelter for our individuals and families who are currently residing in our emergency shelter system who are in facilities that don't allow, don't have enough space, to provide the social isolation they need. meaning six feet of separation. we are deploying my department operation staff to assess asitey shortly, so this comes in the form of churches and the

interfaith councils are very generous and coming forward with plenty of sites for us. because the schools are closed i'll now look at potential cafeterias or gymnasiums and several other sort of larger facilities to assess and then the most difficult part with those congregated areas are the staffing. and the nature of some of the needs of the population and their acuity sometimes requires a higher level staff than simply hotel staff or a volunteer or a disaster service worker. so that's the next sort of phase that we're looking at. and then the final phase would be the general homeless population, individuals who are on the street. i know that director kazinski and the team has been doing work around education -- on isolation even on the street and the separation among tents and educating and providing them with resources that they need.

but the governor's orders recommended this and i think that it's good public health practice that we look at expanding our shelter capacity for individuals who are currently on the street who haven't shown any signs of being exposed or haven't, you know, been tested and the like. and so that's sort of our third phase. we can really do that in conjunction with phase two which is assessing for what i'm calling shelter thinning and sort of decreasing the populations in our shelters, obviously, for our homeless population. so the heavy lift for that again is staffing and the high level of professional staff needed, especially given the needs on the public health side for trained clinicians. >> so two quick questions before supervisor haney who is also on the roster. do you -- what about people living on the streets that are experiencing homelessness that are over 65 or

immunocompromised? >> excellent question, supervisor. you know, again, we're sort -- because this is our third phase we haven't sort of ironed out all of the questions. certainly we'd want to prioritize that population and working with, again, director kazinski's team and the outreach teams to identify those people. another population, since we're sort of breaking down sub-populations, are seniors living in our shelter system. and different alternatives for them, perhaps providing them with hotel vouchers or some of the hotel rooms that i mentioned for the other populations because of the vulnerable nature of their situation and their age and other health conditions. >> so we don't currently have any plans to address that population? >> street population that is possibly vulnerable? we do not. well, planning is one thing and we could think about plans in terms of executing that plan, no, we have not begun to execute a plan to get vulnerable 65 plus

year old people off the streets and into shelter. >> and then the 3,500 units or beds or independent units with independent bathrooms, how did you come up with that number if there's 19,000 people -- >> so i'll tell you. so the -- we used a range, an onset range with the department of public health. and it's ranged from .07% of the population to 5.8%, ballparking it, i could look it up but the decimal is not germane. 5.8% of 19,000 is about 1,700. but we put sort of a vulnerable population kicker on that 5%, 5 plus percent. and assuming that the rates can spread in homeless shelters or on the street would have a higher incidence of onset. so the 3,500 really represents

over 10%, 13%. you know, again, it's so difficult to nail down the numbers and this is far from precise and we're taking the best direction from the health experts. it's not my area of expertise -- from the onset in china and italy and the best advice from the c.d.c. as well. >> and i would just argue for planning purposes, i think that my colleagues will ask questions, but every person sleeping on the streets has a weakened immune system because of the elements that they deal with, the lack of sleep they get because it's almost impossible to have a good night's sleep, etc. so i hope that collectively we can develop a plan. >> supervisor haney? >> thank you, president yee. my questions were along those lines about the general homeless population in particular, older individuals, obviously, these

folks cannot home isolate. they can't shelter in place because they don't have access to it. why -- why aren't we planning right now to get all of those folks inside immediately? >> i don't -- supervisors, i don't want to leave you with the impression that we're not planning. we're always planning. it's figuring out how to execute that. and, you know, we're taking the best we can from the public health. and their biggest concern was viruses ripping through s.r.o.s and shelters where we have particularly s.r.o.s where we have a lot of vulnerable people. and as you know among the 19,000 s.r.o.s, and particularly with privately s.r.o.s, a lot of seniors are among those s.r.o.s in very tight communities. that threat per the department of public health is more imminent than a threat of people

being disbursed on the street. so that's where we took that guidance from. certainly, individuals on the street are vulnerable and they're vulnerable for a lot of reasons. and we're tackling that. you know, we, the city, staffing, only have enough resources to tackle this, much like the medical community. and we need to triage where we see the greatest need and the biggest risk and that assessment is through health and the 19,000 people that i spoke about earlier, the people in shelter already and s.r.o.s. >> so you said that we had about a thousand at the hotel rooms and 500 plus that have already been secured and should be online. those are almost entirely it sounds like for people who need to be isolated in some way, and it sounded like you felt like we're sort of getting to a stage where we're going to have enough of those rooms. why isn't our goal to actually go out and get enough hotel rooms and spaces that we'd be

able to house this much larger population and if there is state resources. >> so the department of health guidance is not to take a homeless individual who is on the street and to put him or her in a hotel room with no services. very difficult for d.p.h. to work with that client. they would prefer -- >> that they stay on the street? >> no, i didn't say that, supervisor, that's not a fair interruption, please. >> what would they prefer? >> can i finish? >> sure. >> they would prefer that people on the street are placed in shelters and congregate areas where they can better monitor them and bring the services on-site to make sure that they're safe. we're talking about people with addiction problems. we don't want folks by themselves in hotel rooms and we don't want people who we quarantine to need to go out and treat their addiction by leaving quarantine. this is not the portrayal that

we don't care about this population -- it's offensive. >> i didn't say that. >> well, it was implied, okay? i'm following the department of public health's guidance and they want more congregate settings, and also for folks on the street. they do not feel that it's in good health for them and public health to isolate individuals like that in hotel rooms with a closed door and no services. >> so is there a plan to get the folks who are on the street right now into congregate settings? >> i told you earlier in the response to supervisor ronen that our priority is the 9,000 people in -- 19,000 people in homeless shelters and s.r.o.s and that is our number one priority. as we build up capacity to deal with them we'll move to the next phase which is those on the street. now in the last 3 1/2 hours that i stood in that bench back there, i have been working with

the interfaith council and others to get specific sites and my team will go out and assess probably beginning tomorrow. so the planning is occurring 24/7. >> so is there a number of beds that we're trying to secure to get people to congregate settings and how many have been expanded so far? >> at this phase it's just probably not necessary to target a number at this point. we're running as fast as we can go to get as many congregate settings as we can. today we're going to activate bill graham for tomorrow, and bill graham is not suitable and can't come online for a couple weeks. >> have there been any public buildings, you know, either like bill graham or rec and park buildings or other facilities that have made -- been made available and to expand -- >> bill graham is not suitable. there's too much for various reasons. you know, st. mary's cathedral

has always been a good partner and that's a very good facility. and the interfaith council through the winter interfaith shelter that occurs during the rainy months would offer their churches. certainly, the gymnasiums and the schools that are closed and the cafeterias. we could have capacity just back of the envelope given all of that for easily a thousand, 2,000. the key though and the difficulty is that this is not -- this is a population that as you know very well, supervisor, that has some very acute needs. no health needs, addiction and we can't just get volunteers and service workers from other city departments to staff them. it's not safe for them and not safe for the homeless individuals. so the key is really less individuals and identifying them and providing the cots and everything else, which we can do pretty much in 12 to 24 hours at any particular site. it's the staffing and because

d.p.h. is so stretched and because our non-profit partners are so stretched it's a difficult thing. >> president yee: if you don't mind and supervisor preston don't mind to hold your questions for a minute, and mary ellen has to leave in a minute. so if you can stick around -- >> i have about another 14 minutes before i meet with the policy folks, thanks. >> mary ellen, i just wanted to make the announcement that we talked about but i want to say publicly that i cannot thank you enough for everything that you're doing. you're truly a hero. >> well, thank you. i'm not a hero. i'm a public servant. this is my job. this is the work that my team

has prepared for. it wasn't quite exactly what we thought that we were going to get but it's what we got. so i just wanted to share with the board that at muskoni city that is the city emergency operation center on monday -- you might want to clean that off -- before touching the microphone. that in order to both expand our operations and in order to have the appropriate social distancing, so that we could have the safest environment for the over 120 staff from 26 departments that are activated at mumusconi. the question if there's anything that we're doing that the public doesn't know about -- we are working in every area of the city and every area of response that you can possibly imagine.

so i'm very pleased that the board is going to send a liaison and a liaison team that. is going to be the best way for you to all understand what's happening there. i welcome you there. however, i do want to let folks know that we have very stringent health screening protocols in place that we put in place today. and so whoever is coming -- which i haven't gotten the final on what that is -- i need to share with the folks this evening. but i'm very proud of the work that we're doing there. we're here to support the department of public health and we're here to inform the public. we are here to protect the most vulnerable and ultimately our number one goal is to protect the health and the safety of all san franciscoians and everyone who is here in san francisco. well the me demonstrate what we do a lot. -- thank you. one of the things that i will mention quickly and then i'll done unless you guys have

questions is a critical function in the e.o.c. is the logistics and resourcing. so we -- we coordinate all of the city resourcing there and so we're very acutely aware of the -- there are many supplies and things that city department needs that we do not have. this is a state and a global -- many of these things are shortages globally and we're working incredibly hard to try to source these materials that we need. i will just say that on a final note i thought that it would be fuel that would bring us down but apparently it's hand sanitizer that will bring us down to a crashing halt. so that's all. any questions from you? >> president yee: no, but i have to make a comment -- supervisor ronen. you know, not only you but your whole team have been marvelous in responding and so it's not

just your team -- >> i know how you feel, supervisor. >> president yee: anybody ask to ask questions of mary ellen. no? >> mr. president, i saw supervisor preston's name on the roster. >> president yee: i wasn't too sure. that's why i asked. are you asking her a question. >> that was on for -- go ahead. if you press your button your name will be removed. >> president yee: you can press it twice. >> i don't know if he's done. >> president yee: no, no, he's coming back. so press it twice. >> so supervisor preston, mr. president, thank you for your indulgence to miss carol.

pursuant to the board of presidents delegation, i will be there tomorrow morning pursuant to the direction of the president and i will appear with one of my staff, that will be my legislative aide, and i will appear with one member of the clerk staff, that would be mr. wilson ing. i have been informed in the ever changing protocols that our original notion of doing this on a daily basis has changed. so i will be at the e.o.c. for one week continuously during the operational hours, which i now believe that are 9:00 to 5:00, although those may expand. and our team of three will be there. to my colleagues, as we try to optimize and make more efficient the communication with every single department head, as we

try to optimize our communication with our constituents, starting tomorrow morning at 9:00, send me everything. i will triage that as i learn how this works. i have been to sims nems training 17 years ago after there was an earthquake. but if you can send me all of your communications, i will run that up the chain, i'll run that down the chain, it will be a two-way source of communication. and if you need to call me, call me and we'll take it from here going forward. >> president yee: thank you. so i have my composure. adding to what supervisor peskin said, supervisor peskin, myself and sonny and sophia were able to go on the first day that it set up.

i wanted to see how they were setting up so that we could actually give everybody a sense of what we should be doing. and the teams down there are just fabulous. they've been working day and night. the second team which is a volunteer team, put out to try to manage who is participating. so the second team will be my office which is after the first week, with the second week, and then supervisor safai already came to me because he heard about it. so if your offices are willing to do this, can you please let me know and i could help. we're trying to juggle which office should be there first or next after three weeks. and i'm pretty sure by the time that the first week would have been completed, a lot of the kinks would be worked out of the

situation. for instance, i think that we should have a dedicated phone down there with a phone number so that we don't have to worry about who we call now, you know, just call that number. that's one thing. and the other thing is that i want to let you know that the quick thought around this link, when you think about volunteering your office and i don't want to pick on anybody, that if you're relatively new to being a supervisor and your whole team is relatively new, you know, there's something to think about. there's for more experienced aides, they know how to navigate those departments a lot easier. so there's something for us to consider that we want good experience with this so it doesn't become a burden on the

other staff members of the other departments trying to do emergencies. so that's what i'm requesting of all of us, okay? >> and, mr. president, if you will give me, colleagues, 48 hours to kind of figure out the basic protocols and mary ellen will let you in and you're not covid-19 p.u.i. i.l.i. or presenting, please feel free to come in and watch and help us out. >> president yee: yep. >> thanks, we look forward to seeing you in the morning and working with all of you. we're all in this together. >> president yee: okay, thank you. and are you still here? there's a few more questions. supervisor peskin? supervisor peskin? >> sorry, supervisors, i had to take a call. >> president yee: supervisor haney, were you finished?

i'm sorry that i cut you off. >> not quite. do you have a sense of how many shelter beds and congregate settings we have expanded so far? do we have more people now inside over this week? >> we don't. we haven't expanded beds in our congregate facilities yet. >> but that's being worked on? >> absolutely, yeah. >> you speak about the plans to use public facilities and schools as shelters and have you been in touch of school board members and they weren't aware of it. >> so the easier facilities are ones that we had a prior engagement with, primarily churches and public buildings, non-sfud buildings but city buildings like bill graham as an example. we're also repurposing one of our navigation centers by moving the central waterfront, by hopefully moving them from one n.a.v. center to another which i

think gives us 65 spaces. so the combination of churches and that n.a.v. center and i'm blanking right now, there's a whole other group of folks -- i'm happy to provide specifics. but, again, with the churches and that we're probably at 350ish. again though, staffing is the issue. one thought that we had is to identify within the existing adult shelter system which is close to 2,000 beds, 1,955 or something like that, identifying individuals who are in that system who would be able to -- who would be okay should we put them in a hotel room, who don't really need the intensive services, who can manage their own affairs and, of course, there are people who fit that description who live in our shelters.

so it's just a matter though of being able to identify them. so that would relieve some space, of course, from shelters and provide that social distancing or allow others to come inside. and then, you know, it's not unlike our drills for earthquakes or elnino which i, unfortunately had to do many times and expanding our facilities. supervisor ronen, i appreciated asked earlier about what can you do as the board. and talk to your constituents about if they feel that they're able to, to step up and volunteer. we don't need 100% of people in a shelter who have special training. we also need volunteers to just help with flow and, you know, light supervision and running errands and things like that. >> what is the best way for people to sign up for that? is there a centralized place? >> we'll first go to the

d.s.w.s, there's plenty of city workers who have been furloughed who we would call back to help with this. but the interfaith council has a very large list of folks who are happy to volunteer and they have in the past. so that's where we'll go at first. but we can raise that at -- i'm sure that there is a community branch, at the u.o.c. can put out a call for them at their emergency operations center. >> so that all makes sense. just last thing they want to say is that if there are spaces that are like commercial spaces or other sort of vacant spaces that may be privately controlled and they want to make those spaces available or even we might identify those spaces that we might want to use, is that under consideration for -- >> that is the third category of offers that i have set in my mind. yes, we've already had two offers of that. the salvation army generously

reached out and the one on valencia, i believe, and then a private building in the southeast is currently being available. i think that they said 1 150 to 200, so those are starting to flow in and as part of our team of folks who are going out and assessing, that is something that they'll be looking out as well after they have done the easier lower hanging fruit facilities. >> there was one more question and in terms of staffing we're doing expedited staffing to get people in as quickly as possible into the public health space. because staffing sounds like it's a big barrier for us and in this space as well. are there ways that you're expediting hiring and doing things and able to get people online much quicker, and offering incentivized pay to be able to bring people on and keep them on? >> you know, we're not at this point, supervisor. i'm not sure -- well, we'll

explore it. i mean, i think that the easiest way is to deploy our disaster service workers and our city employees who are furloughed. in my department right now of our 2,400 employees, those who can't tele-commute who are non-essential i probably have a couple hundred at least. so that's easier to do and that is their responsibility as a city employee. >> thank you. >> sure. >> president yee: okay, so before i propose a question. (indiscernible) supervisor preston? >> thank you, president yee. and thank you to supervisor haney who asked many of the questions that i was going to ask and i appreciate your answers so i'll keep it short. what i'm trying to understand is on the individual units or predominantly it sounds like

hotel rooms, if you're successful in securing the numbers of those that you have referenced and if there are potentially more, is the idea to have that excess capacity available for the phase one folks? or to move into -- it sounds like you were considering some of the folks in phase two who may be able to live independently. >> yes. >> which is the plan? >> so the plan is to -- so here's the difficult balancing effort. we know that there's going to be much larger spread of the virus and people are going to be infected. we know that a lot more people are going to be exposed and need to be quarantined. we don't know that curve. it's very difficult to predict. so we're going to want to hold back a certain percentage of those rooms that we have secured as vacant to manage that flow or

surge. that's, you know, that's difficult mass and a difficult analysis to do. once we have the universe of rooms under our control, we'll be able to look at that better. but, yeah, certainly, people who are not in that sort of first category of 19,000 who could manage in a hotel room and don't need access to services and don't have other needs that we couldn't address in isolation, sure, that would be an appropriate use. and the other piece that i had mentioned in closed session and i haven't yet today in the open session is the need for first responders. and, again, supervisor peskin, and thanks for him for raising this and i think that it's vital that they can stay healthy and serving the city. and lumped into that is not just first responders and the health care world, it's things like transit operators and other people that are vital to the

operation of the city. and i know that hotel owners, you know -- i'll say this in the public meetings that there's going to be hotel owners that would love to do that and would love to market themselves as a first responder hotel does that's not a problem. it's a massive deployment and a massive exercise of thousands and thousands of rooms for these populations. and supervisor haney, ronen and supervisor preston are certainly mindful of your concerns over the general homeless population and where they fit in that prioritization and we'll take that back to our leadership there and make plans to address that and get that online quickly. my folks are doing fantastic work. to be able to get 600 rooms in a matter of days is impressive. so we can pull this off. >> i think we are -- i think

that as it relates to us, whether with property owners and apartment building owners that have empty units and the list goes on as well as the hotels, right? what is unclear to me still -- understanding that the number of units that you need for your top priority folks is not -- you know, you don't know for sure what you need but i assume that you know for sure the number that you need to set aside and prioritize for that. how do we get there as quickly as possible and get beyond that so that we can start doing the triage of the priority two and three groups -- to get them into those units? >> again, as i said in closed session, we have a meeting and ththe mayor is meeting with dr. cool colfax and i to see what we have to offer. and we have over a thousand rooms in five hotels that have

approached me in the last few hours. so i'm confident that we'll get there, supervisor. if i could do this since this is a public meeting. should you all and your aides and the public hear of folks reaching out, we have a tracker email that goes into our doc. and it's hsadocplanning@sfgov.org. and every request is put on a tracker request and followed up on. again, hsadocplanning@sfgov.org. thank you. >> supervisor fewer? >> yes, thank you, supervisor. i just wanted to mention to my colleagues that the resolution that i proposed today is for our offices to actually help to facilitate a smoother transition than rather than -- we know that there are people who want to volunteer and we're at a

shortage now of workers, shelter workers, and that there are people -- so within our communities that as just said that could volunteer some hours. i'm asking everyone and supervisors to use the power of your office to actually consolidate and be a clearing house for these volunteers to direct them to certain places. and so that everyone isn't just calling this number or 311 or all over the place, but that there's actually a centralized place which is your offices -- and actually it's serving your constituents to have more of a micro handle on what is sort of going on in our districts, but also to be able to funnel people -- direct people to their website or to their offices versus them getting like a million calls or 311 getting a ton of calls. so i wanted to say that on the

ground we could do that type of helpful work when i know that the city is working on a very macro level. >> supervisor walton. >> is there a regional conversation about cal pal -- >> yes, also on our list, yes. >> i'd say lastly to the staff and then we've got to run. one of the other ideas is, you know, obviously former retirees who are in the health care work as well as volunteers who have training background and are formally working with non-profits or not, but sort of a health background or a clinical background. and the third is a lot of our community-based organizations are deemed non-essential per the order so reaching out to employees from those c.b.o.s who are still getting paid. we're going to -- i'm going to bring that up through the -- or

the emergency operation center community branch, that's where all of those requests lie just as an information item. >> thank you very much, supervisors. >> i believe supervisor ronen that -- (indiscernible) might be next. >> good afternoon. the department of homelessness and supportive housing. i wanted to share a couple thoughts with and you i'll take your questions. my main thought would be that we should remember to take -- always remember to take advantage of a crisis. i think that there's going to be opportunities for all of you to think about in the future around acquiring some of these hotels that will be going out of business, that maybe some of them that we're using for temporarily housing but would be

great supportive housing sites. and the other thing that we're should be thinking about is that we're learning a lot right now on how to respond to high needs individuals very quickly in an emergency manner. homelessness is an emergency for everybody who experiences it every single day so i'm hoping that the learnings and the collaboration that we're seeing happening right now could be written down and applied to the city's homelessness response system moving forward. the other things they just wanted to share that have not been shared yet is that we're working closely with our providers, all of their services have been deemed essential services. none of our providers, bless them, have stopped doing their work. they're all struggling with staffing and struggling with supplies. so we're doing two things in partnership with them. one is that we have created a central supply warehouse for our providers and they'll be able to fill out a form and say that i need toilet paper and then we'll email them back and say come to this location and you don't even

need to get out of your car and drive in and we'll throw it in the back of your trunk and off you go. so we are also servicing our providers to understand what their staffing needs might be and these are essential services and we have created a number of job descriptions for the city disaster workers if necessary. so that is happening as well. we're sending them out daily email blasts, some are having calls two times a week with our providers and we're in constant communication with them and supporting them and we want to thank them all and all of the city staff for staying on the frontlines and doing this work and, frankly, risking their own health. and dealing with, you know, family anxietyiettettey, and tod you that we're doing that every single day for 13,000 homeless and formerly homeless people and those services have to continue.

then we'll working with director roar and the e.o.c. to ensure that in the event that there's an outbreak that we're prepared to address that as quickly as we possibly can. we'll take any questions that you may have. >> yes, what is the policy right now towards tents? are you removing tents from the street? or are you letting people stay and trying to space them out? >> so as of yesterday, we've briefed all of the key departments, the police and h.s.h., of course, and public works, on a new procedure around addressing this. essentially we're not going to take people's property away from them during this situation. we are going to ask people to not be in groups of more than five. to keep tents six feet apart. and not to share tents with somebody unless it's your partner and not to go into one another's tents during this

crisis. based on the guidance from the public health departments and dr. evans and street medicine, we think this is the best practice. we'll continue -- the police department will continue to enforce the law as needed and if there's criminal activity they'll address it. and if they need to compensate property in those cases i imagine they will. public works will continue to clean but they're not going to take people's property. in fact, what we have recommended is that they give people who are in tents garbage bags and suggest -- ask people to clean up their areas themselves and then leave the garbage bags in a place that is good for the public works employees. that way they can minimize social contact and maintain a good distance from folks. but still keep the streets clean. they're going to continue to be power washing and keeping the streets clean as usual. that's a public health need that needs to continue, but we'll not be removing encampments. this is a good way to model how to develop a more cooperative

spirit with people who are on the streets. i don't think that it's okay for there to be large tent encampments and i don't think that it's okay for people to be disrupting and blocking sidewalks and disrupting other people's lives, but i also don't think that i'd constantly be trying to move people around, especially during this crisis. and the team is 100% focused on this and we're not responding at this time and we don't have the capacity to respond to 311 calls and we're going out and talking to people in encampments and giving them hygiene kits and knowing where they can meet their basic hygiene needs and asking for cooperation on spacing. i hope that this will work and that is because just like the communities and we see people coming together and being their best selfs in this situation, that applies to people unhoused as well and doing their best to do their best and to help the community to get through this crisis so i'm optimistic that this will be successful immediately, but also we'll have a good long-term impact to how

we do this work in the city. >> are they doing to develop plans to make sure that no individual 60 or older and, again, this is hard because my argument is that all people experiencing homelessness are immune -- their immunity is compromised. but at least for seniors. is h.s.h. coming up with a plan to get everyone indoors? >> yes. well, to get everyone indoors -- >> everyone at the high risk category. >> so ideally, what we would be doing -- and we have put this forward and working on it with h.s.a.s to utilize hotel voucher program which is used off and on in san francisco over the years. we still have small programs to get people who are over 65 out of the shelters. and we also are looking at reorganizing our shelters and

creating more space between beds, as well as creating areas to segregate people who are at risk or maybe segregating people who are sick. so those kind of physical redesigns as well as looking at potentially using a hotel voucher program as well as director roar said that once we make sure that we have the beds that we need for quarantine and isolation beds and that we're able to add additional beds that we might need to do spacing people out. spacing the beds out. because that's going to make us lose capacity. and we should look for additional shelter beds if we can get them. and, again, hopefully modeling how to quickly set up shelters to get people off the streets. however, you know, we have to deal with the public health needs first and make sure that the hospitals don't get overwhelmed by getting these other beds set up for quarantine and isolation as the director said there's huge staffing

challenges that we're going to face. but we're looking at creative opportunities, both using disaster service workers and also potentially volunteers. so, yeah, we're actively engaged in working on this. and then the other thing that we're working on with the department of public health has been an amazing -- everyone is an amazing partner but we have been working with the public health department on folks who have serious mental health issues or substance use disorders who need to be quarantined and isolated and we need to accommodate their needs and we're working on that as well. so there's a lot going on and it's complicated but we're moving quickly and keeping things in place. and by the end of the week we'll have a substantial number of beds stood up and ready to go. >> supervisor haney? >> thank you, president yee, and thank you for your work. i than you're working at all hours of the day and your team as well. a couple questions. one is on the status of the

supplies for the shelters and n.a.v. centers and supportive housing. i have communicated this to you but i wonder if you could give us the latest on this. and i heard from three providers who said they have run out or they'll run out soon of toilet paper and bleach and sanitizing wipes and other essential supplies. how are we securing these supplies? do we have a shortage? is there a way to help, do we need donations? >> yes, yes and yes. and we're going to businesses and asking for donations. i know that some companies that have donated handwashing stations to us and we are reaching out. so any suggestions or contacts that you have we essentially went to our supplier yesterday and bought everything that we possibly could. it's now at a location that our providers -- we were just made aware at 4:00 today, i'm on a call with them.

but we'll run out very quickly. we think that we have like a week's worth of supplies. and then, you know, we have 100 facilities that h.s.h. operates. shelters and permanent supportive housing and drop-in centers and we're serving, again, 13,000 people a day in shelter and housing. so we have a huge need and we're happy to accept donations, but, you know, we have put our requests into the e.o.c. but many systems need these supplies los angeles and we'll keep doing the best we can. and we're happy to accept any and all donations of toilet paper, cleaning supplies and bleach, anything like that. >> so it would be great if you and your team could communicate that to us so we can communicate it out publicly who the people would donate to and where to drop it and what is needed. because i think that there's a lot of people and businesses and larger office builds that probably have a lot of supplies they could give. i started to reach out to folks

and directing them directly to the providers but i don't know if there's a more centralized way to do that. >> yes and i will write that up and send that out to you this evening. and i think my staff probably have already been working on this today because i know that it was discussed on a call that i was on this morning. >> so i know that all of us are concerned about staffing from a number of different angles. we have to quickly expand in terms of the shelter beds and the hotels and everything that is happening. do you have a way to -- and i asked a similar question but to expedite hiring, training and there may be a lot of folks out of work right now who want to help either as volunteers. and with that, how we are making sure that folks who are working in these spaces are safe and healthy. i've gotten feedback from folks who have worked at shelters in supportive housing saying that a lot of the members don't want to come in because they feel they

don't have -- they're not able to wash their hands and there's no protection for them. and so it's adding to the shortages. >> yeah, i don't want to speak for director callahan. i know that they issued a department of human resources issued a memo about expediting hiring in certain cases and i know that she'll be back to speak to you as well and you can ask her for a copy of that guidance. so as far as the city goes and the safety of city workers, that's in her purview and they've issued quite a lot of guidance to city employees around hiring and around safety. we have issued that same guidance that we've gotten from the department public health department to our non-profit omaha ployees. i think that -- employees. and a lot is with information and there's a lot of myths about the need for masks and how the disease is transmitted. we're doing our best to make sure that staff are kept safe. we do have a protocol at the sthelters and our other sites if

there's a client who is coughing to immediately give that client a mask. again, there's a shortage of everything as dr. colfax had mentioned so we're using what we have in the most effective way that we know how based on the health department's recommendations. and that there's a huge need to give every employee masks. and it's important to put that mask on them and we have delivered supplies to the shelters and we continue at the pace that we're at right now to have enough to give out for that purpose. >> thank you. and i think that is going to be an ongoing issue to prepare for because we obviously we have so many people on streets and we say that we have the space now but not the staff. and another thing is that we have hundreds of people in the shelters and in the n.a.v. centers who are not able to maintain the social distancing and they're in congregate settings and large rooms eating together, and this is an

unhealthy situation. many of the folks are older, 334 people in a shelter and over 60 of them are over 65. so as i understand it there's a plan or there will be a priority to try to find the folks in those shelters and to get them into hotel rooms and then also in the shelters to create new policies and rules so that we can maintain distance and people can be protected and healthier and that the virus wouldn't spread rapidly within the shelters. >> yes, you characterized that correct. >> well, as soon as that could happen. -- >> yes, you know, wholeheartedly agree. and we'll start screening clients when they come into shelters and ask them health questions to make sure that we, unfortunately, cannot get thermometers that we need to safely take people's temperatures. but we are going to be asking screening questions and if folks need to be self-isolated we're going to set up a situation where we can help that person -- not deny them a place to sleep

but to find a place to go immediately. >> and i'm sure that you're looking at this, but a policy where lots of new people are coming in all the time and if they're presenting symptoms or they're very sick or have a fever, how there's some level of screening. >> yes, there is and there's a process in place that we encounter a client that we know to contact the d.p.h. and they will instruct us what to do in that situation. but that also reminded me of one other thing is that we had suspended all time limits on all shelter beds. so, you know, it doesn't make sense for people to be kind of coming in and out and in and out of the shelter system. so now everybody is able -- we're just doing 30-day chunks but everybody in the shelter got an automatic 30-day extension and that will continue throughout this crisis. and we'll also ultimately, if this continues for a long period of time, we'll ultimately point to the need for us to expand

shelter capacity. because the more that people don't have access to a safe place to sleep, because a lot of people use shelters as a respite from the street for 90 days and their shelter stay is up and they're back on the streets again and we'll need to find other places for people to go. >> and a last question, for folks in supportive housing we have concerns about food insecurity, that is an ongoing issue. and now when they're asked to shelter in place there's a lot of concern from providers that they're not going to be able to access food, and is there a plan in place to get them access or delivery of food? >> yes, there is. there's a whole food group set up at -- in the h.s.a. doc. one of my staff members is on that and we have a plan for delivering meals to people. and we're working to increase meals at the shelters. and some shelters only have two meals a day and we'll increase it so all shelters have three meals a day and people don't have to be hungry or go out

looking for food or unnecessarily out on the streets. >> so for folks in supportive housing there's a way to get food to them? >> not for everybody in supportive housing or people who have to self-quarantine or are not able to come out, we will expand our contract with meals on wheels and other food providers to do that. so, absolutely. >> thank you. >> but, supervisor, if we could go back to one point that you brought up which i thought was a really great one is thinking about people who are losing their jobs in this crisis. which are many, many people. i mean, all kinds of businesses are closing and it's having an impact on low-wage workers and we need staff. so i think that it's worth figuring out how we can marry those two needs together. because we certainly need people. all of our providers need folks. so if there's anything that you all could do to help to think that through, we would be grateful. i think that it's a great idea. >> this is a great time to open up the doors to try to get more

people to come, and either staff or volunteers to help with this work. so whatever we can do to help. thank you. >> president yee: so just i had a quick thought as you were discussing these issues with toilet paper and other supplies. i'm sure that you guys or the city people have thought of this already. one -- some of the institutions that are closing down, i'm thinking in terms of universities that are pretty much done for the semester, has anybody approached them because you have, you know, storage -- and you have supplies that is in store for quite a few lengths of time and maybe that could be available to your situation. >> i think dillon is back there taking notes. that is an excellent idea. and i really appreciate that one. dormitories that are being emptied out. and potentially could serve as excellent places. >> supervisor peskin?

>> thank you mr. president, and thank you director kazinski that you just presented and the only sub detail that i'd like to ask you about is how the $5 million per month package that the mayor rolled out relative to -- you spoke to part of this which is meals -- but as it relates to sanitation and congregate housing, how is that going? >> thank you. and so the other thing is acquiring additional janitorial services through a master contract. i think that there's a number of companies that have been engaged on this. and we're setting up a system where if they need additional service, the same way they need supplies or staffing, we have created a form for them to fill out and they'll send it to us and they'll get the janitoral support. and that extends to private s.r.o. buildings that may not have the janitorial services and

they need to keep their residences as safe as they can be. >> and part of that is education, voluntary compliance. part of that is enforcement. and part of that package included hiring up two additional enforcement people at d.b.i. do you know how that's going? >> i know that just today -- this is taking a little bit longer than any of us would have liked when they had the task force that includes d.b.i. staff and city attorney staff and environmental health staff as well as h.s.h. staff who are all -- i don't know where they're at in terms of the hiring but this group is now working together. they've been kind of doing things through email or phone calls and now they're meeting every day at the e.o.c. and we've got a full-time staff person assigned to work on that. so i'm hopeful that things will start to move quickly. but i'm not sure where d.b.i. is in terms of hiring? >> thank you for that answer i'll be at the e.o.c. at 09:00

and we'll figure it out. >> president yee: supervisor walton. >> a brief question. the information in terms of what we're doing around the new tent policy. is that something that we're going to be putting out -- >> around? >> the tent policy? >> thank you for that question. we will eventually -- when i begin my new job and maybe have five more minutes than i do now, we'll work on writing that down. but right now it's not in writing. i had a briefing call with the key departments. i have confirmed with the chief of police and the head of public works that that message is being passed down to their staff, confirmation from my staff, that that is now what is happening. and we will eventually put this in writing. but probably, you know, probably monday or tuesday of next week. >> thank you. >> i think that is it. thank you. oh, i'm sorry, supervisor

peskin. i'll just call you. >> supervisor preston. >> just one question regarding some shelters that are not 24 hours, so, for example, in my district the first friendship emergency family shelter where folks have to leave at 7:00 in the morning -- i know that there's other shelters that don't operate 24 hours. and i'm curious if there's been -- any effort underway under the circumstances to try to have shelters that are less than 24 hours to be a resource during the day as well? >> yes. thank you for that question. i couldn't have scripted this discussion any better. we are working on that and trying to get all shelters that are currently not open 24 hours, including first friendship, to stay open and to provide three meals a day. so that's in the process and i don't know the status of that, but that's our intention is that all shelters stay open 24/7 and

there's only a few that do not and so it shouldn't be too big of a lift. >> thank you. >> president yee: okay, i think that is it. thank you very much,. >> thank you very much. >> clerk: next dr. odogon if you could come up and the question that we were asking for all of the department leaders is whether or not there is any programs that you're working on that haven't been publicly been mentioned so that we're aware of as we plan our legislative agenda and work with our constituents and our offices. >> so in my current role as the health officer -- good evening, i am the health officer of san francisco. so in my current role as health

officer, i have been thinking primarily strategically at a population health level and working with other health officers and other counties, studying what is happening in other countries. learning from the experts that we have here in the bay area, to understand what strategies we're going to do moving forward. and in terms of where we're going, there was a question that was asked earlier about what can you do. the measures that we need to do are by our regular standards very drastic. and so the population is going to need the support, the social support, to really be able to endure -- endure everything that we're going through. i wanted to just describe to you really briefly where the evolution of where we got to, and where we are today.

initially we started with travel restrictions to prevent introduction. as cases started coming, we focused on isolating cases and quarantine contacts. that body is called containment. it's an important strategy and a lot of what you hear about getting people into housing for isolation and quarantine, it's absolutely critical. super time intensive. and it has been limited by testing. the third one, the third area, is what people normally call mitigation and focusing on social distancing involving schools and workplaces and social gatherings. in the last few days, we had really been thinking and seeing what is happening in italy and really trying to understand what is the key strategy that we needed to implement so that we don't become -- what is happening in santa clara, and the health officer in santa

clara said to us, you are a week ahead of us. you don't want to be where we're at now a week from now. and just watching the explosion of this virus. and so a key strategy is to have people stay at home so they do not become exposed. and you reduce -- you reduce exposure except when you have to go out for essential services. and for us to be able to support that strategy it took -- it took -- we worked with the attorneys across the bay area and the idea is that how we keep people in place but have enough of the economy running that supports essential services so people can stay home safely and not have to go out and get

exposed and to expose other people. so that's probably -- i would say that the things that we're thinking moving forward is really thinking about how do we strengthen what we're doing. what are the areas that we got wrong that we need to adjust. and so the continuing support that we have from you for supporting social services and social infrastructure is going to be really be critical. and the other thing that i want to point out is that i want to just share one more thing and that is one thing that i learned from sunday night that just now is stuck in my head is that hours matter. this virus, the way that it moves, is explosive. to give you an idea of how explosive this virus is, is that we have an iceberg. at the very top of the iceberg are the people that die. and then we have the people who are in the i.c.u. and then you have this iceberg that you

cannot see. and we were not able to see any part of this iceberg because of our testing debacle that happened in the country. that's increasing, which is great, but that iceberg that we cannot see is doubling every six days. that iceberg that we cannot see is doubling every six days. that means that it's just going to explode like this and that's why the measures that we're taking -- while they seem drastic it's our only hope of trying to freeze that from growing any further so that people can -- people who are infected can recover. so that means -- how we move happens in days. that's it. sorry. >> president yee: supervisor peskin. >> with the president's indulgence, doctor, do you think that we're being aggressive enough? and what other steps would you suggest to this government that we take that we're not taking now, sir?

>> so you're asking a really good question. i would say that we're in our approach, we're close to what is happening in europe. except that they're being more restrictive on enforcement of shelter in place orders is my understanding. >> okay, so let's talk about transportation. i am very concerned that the bay area regional transportation system,bart, is moving a lot of non-essential people around this region. not people who have to go three stops on the 38 or the 30 or name your bus line -- the 5. but people who actually do not need to move around the region, who are non-essential. do you have a comment on that? >> you're slielg absolutely rig. i would say that the transportation system is a

vulnerability, and to function we need the transportation systems to just get the essential workers here. but your point is absolutely correct. >> so if you had advice to the individual who is representing our local transportation property, the sfmta, who is sitting right there, what would your advice be? >> i would discourage people from doing non-essential travel, including local non-essential travel. >> how would you suggest that? >> that's a good question. i would have to sit down and think a little more carefully about how we'd do something like that. >> how would you suggest that for bart? with generally other than nurses, doctors and first responders, does not need to operate at all. how would you suggest that? >> you know, for me i can think

about it conceptually and i'd have to sit down with the city attorneys and really understand -- >> the attorneys don't run this government and they just give us advice. >> i agree, i agree. but i would have to think about that. i know -- i can tell you what is happening in other countries. >> yeah, what do they do in other countries? >> they're tracking your cellphone so they know when you move around, they know who you are and where you are, and you can't -- you can't move into certain spaces unless you've been cleared so they have a whole surveillance infrastructure -- electronic surveillance infrastructure to really monitor the movement of people. i know -- i had heard that somebody was telling me in france when somebody was on -- before they would leave their home, this is not verified and just told to me -- they'd have to put online why they were leaving and print something out and when they're out and about

they have to show police this is why i'm out on the street and i'm not staying home. >> so the chief health officer, what recommendations -- we don't do that in america.that in amer >> i know. >> but -- because there's a hugh distance between -- >> i agree. >> with that kind of invasion and the stuff that i'm talking about which is stuff that we can control. we can control mune and we canf arguably control bart. so there's a huge distance their cellphones that we do notd do and will not accept in our or culture. wha and what you are recommending.. can you bring thahat together quickly now, sir.hat together >> i would say the key issue is for us to minimize, to the extent possible, nonessential travel, including locally and we don't have a campaign to do that right now. becausbecause what happens is tt this is so massive, so massive,

that a lot of the enforcement happens from the peer pressure and they see what other people are doing. so at this moment, even for this order, we don't have a massive campaign yet to really, really enforce how important it is to not be out. >> as the chief health official of this town, who is not dr. colfax, how are you relaying that to the mayor, to other officials in this town with the urgency that you're expressing to the elected body of san francisco right now? >> that's a great question.

today has been spent mitigating and trying to understand how the order applies or doesn't apply to them. >> you have gone through three steps we should take as a city and what would the three steps be? >> at this moment today, i would not do more than we're doing today until -- because i'm being honest with you. because i think, like i said, this started sunday morning as we started looking at putting everything together and it happened so fast. >> started on january 28th and santa clara blew up and god bless you and your five colleagues and that precipitated to mayors. and we will probably in a few minutes actually take action to

ratify our mayor's order. but what three steps or one step or two steps, how would you step this up if you want to flatten the curve? >> again, ilet's say you won't w transport, we would have to figure out how to support people in place. if people can't get around, how will we support people? we need transportation so essential workers are able to move around. that's one area. the other area that was mentioned earlier and i will tell you what i lose sleep over, i feel that we may be able to -- this broad measure may able to mitigate infection among the general population who is able to sheltener place, understand the issues, et cetera. and where i start losing sleep is that even if everyone there did a great job, our

vulnerabilities are, again, we already know they'll be our condegrecongregate living and wn have an explosion in those populations. so those are areas i believe we need a lot more work in. >> but doctor, isn't our transportation system congregate living? >> it's not congregate living. again, to the extent that people separate in transportation -- i'll just give you an idea, just because sometimes people don't understand this and this is from experts that study this. is that it's not just the contact -- it's the contact rate, the distance and the duration.

so, for example, in the models that have taken the covid, basically one-third or actually let me just put it to you this way. we cut up a pie into six pieces and two of those pieces, two out of six or one-third transmission occurs in the household. because prolonged contact. and that's one of the reasons why congregate living is so critical. we know in sros, you have people living in crowded conditions and multiple families in one room. that's where infection can happen. schools is one-sixth and workplace is one-sixth and the community in general, the community in large, when you put it together will be two pieces, two out of six or one-third. so it's not -- it really depends on duration. you're absolutely right about transportation. to the extent people are crowded, to the extent people

send prolonged periods of time, the risk goes up. but if i hop on bart for a 20-minute ride, that's different than living with somebody and being with them for hours or being in a restaurant where you're not just spending prolonged periods of time but you're doing a lot of exchange. so transportation is a vulnerability, but it's also an essential infrastructure and we'll have to figure out how to tackle that one. >> so doctor, i will stop after this, and i don't want to be argue goargumentive, but you to, it's exploding. it's not an air-borne disease but a droplet disease and if i touch something and then improve touch my eye or my nose or my mouth, then i can get it.

what i'm trying to talk to you about is the recommendations that you would make to the mayor, to this body or, actually, under state law in your absolute authority and weirdly enough and i've never had this conversation with anybody who has the powers that you actually personally have. there are no greater powers that a chief health officer has under state law. you actually don't have to come to us. you don't have to go to the mayor. these powers are actually held by you personally. so what i am asking you is what steps would you take if you tell jeff tumlin that you have to do this, as a matter of law, he has to do it whenever you issue the order. you are the most important individual person in this town as a health official.

so the questions that i'm asking you are not arbitrary. they're not capricious, but they're the most important questions that could be asked in public, in this town, at this time, noting that we're doing much better than santa clara and much better than any other neighboring county. >> so let me tell you what -- i'll try to explain this to you, but i spent a huge amount of time thinking about this. and so this is just a little diagram i drew today. we are -- >> you can put it on the overhead. >> this is a little bit embarrassing. but we have pulled every lever. we have pulled every lever and one thing i didn't mention of the levers we pulled, what we're doing is beyond mitigation. it's actually called a

suppression strategy. we're not just trying to flatten the curve. the idea behind flattening the curve is, from some of the papers estimate up to 80% of the population will become infected, up to 80%. the question is, do you want that 80% to get infected in a short period of time now or do you want it to be flattened out? that's the mitigation strategy, the flatten-the-curve strategy you've been hearing about. what we've embarked on is called a suppression strategy and it's more impressive than the mitigation strategy. that's the fourth one you see here and we're trying to get the reproductive number less than one. why are we moving in that direction? because there's so much uncertainty. we don't know. there is a role -- we know it's definitely droplet spread, when you're close by, in fine

aerosoles and we are assuming that with asymptomatic infection, when you have 100% people of the susceptible, that's like dropping a match and it may be only a few matches, but it's dropping a match on gasoline because everybody is susceptible. we have to learn to do it better and faster. at least with the modeling papers are telling us, for us to be successful, we would have to do this for more than three weeks, going on into months. so the question that these papers ask is that how do we begin, if we're successful in doing the suppression strategy, how do you take your foot off that accelerator? that means that we would have to

have a public health infrastructure that is able to do these other strategies that other countries are doing and doing well because they have an army of people that do contact tracing and quarantine. we havour public health infraste is so small that we don't have enough to do syphilis contact investigation. so we are down to the bare bones in public health infrastructure. these other countries have invested in the public health infrastructure, so they have all of the people to do, all of the contact investigation and case isolation, contact investigation and quarantine in following everybody, because we know that containment strategy works and we need a modern surveillance system. we would need to do massive testing. we would want to test as many people as we can so that we can identify who's infected so we can isolate them.

so those two components, containment and surveillance system is really critical. we don't have that right now. we would need investments of them. >> on that depressing note -- >> hold on, sorry. >> the thing is to realize if you're looking at south korea, singapore, they are countrying that are doing this. so it can be done. it's just that we have to have the will to invest in the public health infrastructure that's required to be able to pull back on a very aggressive strategy until a vaccine becomes available because that's what we're waiting for and that's not coming for at least a year. >> supervisor safaye? >> so i think you said a lot of what i wanted to ask for. it sounds like from everything, all of the resource and reading

i've done, we are taking the most aggressive measures, probably, in the united states. >> as of today, yes. >> so we are taking the most aggressive measures and what i've heard you say is, you need a little bit more time to understand how much suppression is working, and reading also today that the cdc and, also, the federal government is encouraging more private testing to the point where we might have at some point the ability to do thousands of more tests. can you talk a little bit about that? with all due respect, to supervisor peskin, it's important to talk about transportation where that could lead and where we are, but there's been a conversation about trade-offs and what that could mean in terms of essential employees being able to get to where they need to go that don't necessarily have access to automobiles, right? >> right. >> i think that's something you're weighing, so could you talk about the testing and the trade-offs in terms of allowing

the suppression to take time? >> yeah, so testing is going to be, in my mind, will be very, very critical, especially for people that have mild symptoms, because oftentimes -- right now, as you know, as dr. colfax said earlier, our testing is being reserved for people at higher risk and oftentimes we tell people just stay home and recover. we don't know what they have. we want to know what they have. we want our surveillance systems to know -- we want to be able to tell that person who has a mild illness, you don't have covid, don't worry about it, get better, go back to work. but if you do have covid, we absolutely want you isolated and so this is really critical because that's where a lot of the infections are happening because people have mild illness. they're out and about and contaminating surfaces, infecting people and people don't realize they're becoming infected from somebody because

you can't tell when somebody has mild symptoms. one thing we'll be pushing for, our public health surveillance system, we only receive at the health department positive tests. we don't receive all of the negative tests. so, for example, what they did in santa clara, they looked at the negative tests and they found that 11 people showing up with influenza-like illness, 11% of them tested positive. that's a high number. we need to have a surveillance system so we need to make testing reportable by law so i can tell you what proportion of ilis are covid because that lives us an important idea of what is happening. so testing is critical and what was the other one? it was about essential workers? >> the trade-off in terms of further than what we do. >> that's the other one that we really struggled with, but we know because of unaffordable

housing in the city, the vast majority of our workforce lives outside of the city. and so, we need them. we need this army of workers here with us, whether they're cleaning sros or whether they're an epidemiologist. we need them and want them to get here safely and so the public transportation plays that important role. , including police, fire, public safety and all other public workers that have to commute here. >> just based on the orders today in terms of the essential workers, there's more than just police, fire and others that are deemed essential. >> correct. >> there's a whole bevy of people that are essential workers that need access to public transportation. so what i would say, work wig the sfna, are there things we can do in terms of the drivers or the other workers that are there, kind of informing people

as they go in whether it means ensuring people are doing social distancing? are there other things we can do to manage our public transportation system in a more healthy way? >> you're absolutely right and i think the most important thing is going to be social distancing and environmental disinfection and educating everybody when they go in and out of transportation to -- actually, you'll notice that i cleaned the platform before i put my books down. so it's really developing a super awareness. i won't touch that. developing a super awareness of how you can become infected and it has to go, also, into transportation, as well. >> i guess my point is a little bit more refined in the sense that because of your position and because of your direction and because of the directives that you can give, working with our bart board and with our sfmta, could you give specific instruction -- because we have a lot of essential workers that

are still in the city that would be redeployed to help with this and also as a part of this containment strategy as people are getting on and off public transportation. >> yeah. i'm not sure what -- is there a specific intervention you're thinking about? >> giving them the instructions on what to do and having additional people? right now on a muni-bus, you only have the driver, for example. does it make more sense to have an additional person on there to make sure people are doing the appropriate thing? >> anything that adds to the effort, absolutely, and i think that's one of the challenges, is that, yes, when you sit down and resign -- when you sit down and resign a process, you will discover that, yes, we need more people to do those types of things. i haven't sat down and thought about resigning transportation,

but there are people that specialize in just those types of things. there's scientists that are called implementation scientists and their sole mission is understanding the science of behavioral change. how do you understand how people interact to optimize the behaviour change that you want? and there is a team of implementation scientists at ucsf looking at these types of questions. the challenge that we have is that hours matter. and so this is where these things, where even though we have implementation scientists, we'll have them look at, for example, how to help people stay at home and what are the barriers and unable enablers tot home? how can we use evidence to do that? unfortunately, if we don't work fast enough, it may help us a few months from now but not

today. >> besides that, is there something the sfmta and staff can do now, ensuring people aren't sitting next to one another? >> absolutely. right now it's going to be social distancing, disinfection, making hand sanitizers available and all of the real basic things and not asking people to push -- so, for example, i'll give you an example, these doors right here, right, these doors should be open, right? you should at least have one door open so people can walk in and out without touching surfaces. if you have 500 people here, you have 500 people touching a common surface and you could have infected 500 people with one door. >> isn't that muni? >> that's my point. that's my whole point. up have to really sit down and design the system so that people are minimizing -- supervisor

ronan heard my speech, minimizing contact with surfaces and so it's not just my voluntary contact. it's designing the environment so that they don't have to make that decision, right? if a door is open, you don't have to push it. and if you have hundreds of people going through a door and a hundred people are pushing it, that's 100 exposed people. you have to take that mindset. >> i guess that would be my last thing, through the chair. >> but this is a lot of work. everything that i'm describing is a lot of work, including the social distancing, having ads, having all of it resigned so that you're making it safe for essential workers to come to work. >> thank you. >> so supervisor peskin? >> thank you, president yee. on your example of the door, we

walk into city hall and that door is closed and that one is using the same handle for this building. so everyone just echo that and everyone needs to be thinking about their workplace and thinga door or wearing a glove or washing your hands, that's absolutely essential. and i think -- obviously there are things like testing that we, as a body may not have access to. we made a big step yesterday in having folks shelter in place and probably the single biggest

thing we can do is to consistentlily anly get the wor. i will say the mayor and folks who spoke at the press conference yesterday, i think, delivered a very clear and strong message. so i think there is good messages and some of the materials we share do that. and i guess it's partly a comment and partly a question because i'm curious what's in the works on this. but we in this body, i think, are particularly connected to our constituents and have the ability to get the word out in substantial way. what i don't see happening more broadly in terms really getting the word out around the importance of all of the measures that you're talking about is robo calls,

standardized emails coming from every department and every supervisor and frankly, everyone who ever ran for office in this town and whether they won or not, to their lists. and phone trees and phone banks. i mean a lot of the things that many of us did to get elected here in this body are the ability to reach out to thousands of people. doing that, i think -- amber alert on the phones, i don't know if that's an option of getting forced communications to cell phones. we talk about buses and i agree with supervisor safaye of having someone on the bus to walk through the bus but signage. instead of advertising product, let's put stuff up that's jarring and talks to people about these issues. so i think there's a huge amount we can do and i think it has to happen really quickly and i think the more our offices and

certainly my office to invite you to -- if there's a campaign, a real robust campaign, i'm not aware of it. we're trying to do our part and all of us on this board are, but the sooner the better in terms of getting out the word in a more robust way. the laugh thing i want tthe lasa contrast to what some of the other speakers and particularly director roher spoke about, i think your point, if i'm not missing it, even if we do all of that right, even if we ramp up testing and even if folks follow the instructions that the mayor and department of public health and yourself gave to everyone yesterday, that we run the risk because of congregate living weighingsesituations, that it es again or emerges. and so that's a real disconnect, i think, to when we were hearing

about the priorities here. frankly, i think one of the things that seems to be being deprioritized so some extent is -- i mean, we're moving folks one from congregate living situation to another one, maybe a better one, and we don't have a great plan around folks who are unhoused. and so, i wonder if you could just talk about your -- whether there is a disconnect between your view on that and other city leaders or if i may be mischaracterizing or misinterpreting the difference. >> so right now, i don't represent any policy option from the health department around that, wit but i can tell you -- >> whoa, whoa, whoa, you're not the health department. you're accorded certain powers of state law. you are not the health department. you have certain, specific powers, sir. >> i agree, but i also work for

the health department, but let me explain to you from a public health perspective, from a public health perspective, housing first is the way that we think about how things should be. and so we feel that people in terms of dignity, equity and compassion should have access to dignified housing like every other human being and that's the public health ethic and that's the public health approach. i know it actually plays out ind the real world may not be that but that's how any public health practitioner would tell you, housing first is our goal. and i would say -- and i know that's how the health department operates, just like we also work in the area of harm reduction. and i agree with you, just now speaking from a disease transmission perspective, i

become concerned about shelters. i know, for example, with tuberculosis, which is airborne, historically people who are outdoors caught thank you bur s less than those in shelters. and to the extent people are housed in situations that reduces that, that's absolutely better from an infectious disease perspective, yes. >> if i could just follow up, though, on that last point. so what would be -- what is your recommendation regarding folks right now in congregate living situations? i mean, because what i was hearing earlier is that it is not the top priority to get them to the extent they can be in

individual units. i mean, what we're hearing is there may be in excess of available hotel rooms, frankly, or at least many. >> yeah, so i guess there's probably -- i'll tell you what i think the challenge may be and that is, so, for example, let's say you were exposed, ok, and you needed to get housing so that you can be quarantine, it would only last for 14 days. and i think that's part of the challenge, is that these places -- what we're trying do is, we're trying to interrupt transmission. so it's great that all of these rooms are becoming available because i can just tell you, a few weeks ago, we were having trouble finding one. from our perspective, we need places for especially people who

are positive, people who are symptomatic and you would like them to be in their own location with their own bathroom so they're to the infecting anybody and that would be the ideal situation. that's what we want. that's why all of the effort went to that criteria. the problem is it's temporary. if you have limited number, you have to move people in to finish their quarantine in 14, or they recover and have to move out because you need that space for other people who will be going in there. so it's not a permanent solution. >> but there's a policy. it's only -- >> i'm telling you from an infectious disease perspective. >> but it's only a limited number because we allow it to be, either because we're not recruiting more units at a certain point or not exercising our city power or asking the governor to exercise his power

to commandeer units. there's no lack of vacant units in the city and county of san francisco right now to house -- now, there are issues around some individual's fitness to live without supervision in separate units, but there's a heck of a coldfront of folks who could live in a unit like that. >> you're right. >> and my frustration in hearing that we could do everything right and it's that congregate living environment and folks who are homeless, where you still wouldn't be able to control future virus spread. it seems like that should be a top priority right now and i'm not laying this on you. >> right. >> if your recommendation is that if those units are obtainable, right -- >> from a disease transmission perspective, you're absolutely are right. and i can just tell you, a few

days ago, no one -- like, when we first embarked at looking for rooms, you know, the hotel occupancies were 90% and nobody would talk to us and weren't return or phone call. we're iright now we're in a dift situation where we have a lot more available to us because occupancy rates are a lot lower and now businesses are willing to work with us and so you're absolutely right. from my perspective -- so i think we're moving into a world that didn't exist even a few days ago. so i think that's important. >> thank you. i just want to, in conclusion, say that i think that we -- fortunately the number of the units is increasing and i appreciate the folks stepping you and making units available. the units are out there and hopefully folks will come forward voluntarily and if not, we need to figure out how to

take those units and every hour and day matters in terms of disease transmission. so thank you so much for your work. >> supervisor hainey. i know you have a huge amount of influence of what we do from a health perspective and i think what supervisor peskin was leaning into, we need you to intervene more than you are, i think, in this question of what is happening with the thousands of people on our streets and thousands of folks who are in and in our shelters. earlier tonight, and this is the disconnect that supervisor peskin is pointing out, director roher stood up there and i said will we get people to hotels? he said that's not the priority because the public health's position is that people should be in congregate settings and people homeless, it's to get them in congregate settings

which seems to me, from your perspective, not what the department of public health's perspective is and whoever we have to get clarity here, is that for people who are currently homeless and even not yet tested or quarantined or whatever it is, that the best place for them is a room for themselves. and so, for the director of hsa to stand up there to say the director of public health's position is to put people in congregate settings -- >> let me explain how that might have happened. first of all, i completely agree with you. everything that you're saying is from a disease transmission perspective, having your own room is the best, absolutely. i completely agree with you. i think probably what happened is that this order here was put together in a matter of hours with counci counsel from six dit

counties. to show you what they put here for homeless, if you can see it right here, so it says individuals experiencing homelessness are exempt from this section but strongly urged to obtain shelter and governmental and other entities are urged to make such shelter available as soon as possible and to the maximum extent practical. so there's nothing in this order that prevents us from doing more and i think maybe this may have been interpreted because it is a help officer order but it was crafted to be consistent across counties and that may be where some of that interpretation comes from. >> i know we're going on and to wrap this up, i'm concerned that it seems to me, hsa resident for

securing these placements believes it the position of the department of public health or the health officer that you would prefer that people are in congregate settings rather than hotel rooms. that is what he suggested there. and second to that, the situation right now with people who are in shelters and navigation shelters, they're sharing rooms and, as you know, in santa clara, there was the first death and the individual was somebody unhoused. it doesn't mean they're more likely to get it but more vulnerable, so the situation in the city right now, from a public health perspective, to make it clear to the policy makers and administrators who are dealing with the shelterings and the policies around housing is really important that you all get on the same page. because not only did he say that something that seemed to be the wrong thing here but they're doing it because that's what you told them to do and it sounds to

me like you believe the opposite of that. >> yes, i completely concur with everything that you're saying. they may have misinterpreted this or took it verbatim, but i absolutely agree with you, that what you want is what i want. and i will make sure that gets communicated clearly and that everyone here -- and that's what i said earlier, that even if all of these other things work, that's why i worry so much about the congregate living and homeless, is because we know that they're at increased risk because of their living conditions. to the extent we make that better and they have the same dignity, equity and ca compassi, that's how we should do it. >> supervisor furer. fewer. >> there isn't a campaign but it's our job as supervisors in

our district to do the campaign and to get the word out and publisize it ourselves, quite frankly. i want to mention we what heard from hsa, there was a lack of workers or a shortage of workers to work and actually to supervise some of the -- if we were to put people in hotel rooms, we heard there were 19,000 people in sros and 10,000 unhoused folks and that would be 29,000 people. in these hotels rooms we're putting people in, we have to remember that many have been chronically homeless for a long time and have not lived in this type of a setting. so the support system for this, it is about, also, coming with a mandate around housing, getting our unhoused population into housing should also come with a mandate about workers and increasing the wor workforce for this. what we've heard, there's a shortage of workers and why we

can't do some of this is because we don't have the workers to work in so many facilities. so i think that with the mandate comes, also, another mandate about a worker shortage. thanks. >> supervisor ronen. i'm the last on the roster, doctor, so thank you so much. i just am such a fan of yours and really admire all of your work and appreciate you're here and answering all of these questions after everything you're doing. so i'm trying to understand now the extent of your power. so could you issue an order that requires all homeless individuals in san francisco to be housed in individual units? >> so it is true that the powers are broad. however, it's really under the

approve and extend every 30 days. it's broad but it's only good for seven days and you could approve and extend it for 30 days. so ultimately my power comes back to you. and it's actually your power and i'm appointed by the board of supervisors, and you may not know this, but your body appointed me. but i work for the health department. and we are a city and a county. and so the things that are here are all connected in a different way. >> so i just want to tag team off my three colleagues, supervisors preston and haney and fewer. and just say that it was really disturbing to hear trent worth say that he didn't even have homeless people who were living -- or people experiencing homelessness living on the streets as a priority. they're not even on his list of

priorities. his first priority was the 19,000 people living in s.r.o.s and the -- his priority and what he's thinking about is quarantine and confinement. he's not thinking about risks to people that are out there. there's no plans in place going on right now as we speak to even house seniors who are living on the streets. and given that we know from experiences, especially in districts 6, 9 and 10, about how people have to use the bathroom on the street, and dispose of needles and things that they use to support, you know, self-medication, that this is extremely dangerous to the

public health. i mean, i'm getting calls from my constituents daily that, you know, they're seeing human waste and discarded needles on the street. i can't believe that this is not yet a priority of the city. and given that you're an appointed body, if you could take this back and make the department realize what a priority this is for us and i understand that everything is moving very, very fast and that, you know, you're working as hard as you can with the staff that we have. but this is probably one of the biggest things that we have taken out of this hearing today is that we're not prioritizing individuals and especially seniors and people with underlying medical conditions that makes them a priority to get inside of individual units. and we just need to make that a priority now. and to do whatever we need to

do. i appreciate everything that you're saying and our ethos is social justice, that's where we come from. and we did this pivot, and we agree, we agree. >> thank you for everything and i think that we're done. >> president yee: i was going to make a suggestion that maybe we can relate in regards to transportation. right now a lot of us depend on -- (indiscernible) it was only good for the city and bart and now the clip card is extended to be fine for other transportation modes around the bay area. and i'm just wondering if m.t.a., you know, if we were

wanting to minimize that people who don't need to go place to place, to have them stop doing that but at the same time to serve those that are leading the first responders and everyone else to get to one place to another, whether they can come and they should start doing that now if there's a notion that this may last a while and we need to flatten it even more. why couldn't they come up with another card that we would give to those people that need to go from one place on another? and the clip a card wouldn't work anymore. is that a possibility? and so pretty much limit how many people will be taking these things. and so it's easier to control in terms of social spacing. so if somebody can -- he's sitting right there. did you hear all of that for

m.t.a.? did you hear what i just said? >> (indiscernible). >> i'llgist guff you -- just give you -- >> president yee: if you can't do it, you can't do it. >> it's not what the health department does, but there's essential workers and then all of us need to be able to get around to do our food -- to buy food and we may not be an essential worker but i still need to feed my family. >> president yee: supervisor peskin, you're still on the roster. >> thank you, mr. president. i have actually found the file from 2010. we're in the board of supervisors did approve of the motion appointing tomas javier effective december 5, 2010, as the health officer of the city and county of san francisco. i have questions for the city

attorney, but i will let her do more research as to what our powers are. thank you, sir. >> okay, thank you. >> thank you so much. and last but not least, joaquin, thank you for sticking around so long. y. >> good evening, supervisors. i know that you had a long day. i just wanted to provide you with a brief update in terms of the work that we have been doing since we were called into action to support our small business communities and our business communities and our neighborhoods and i'm sure that the people have the most up-to-date information possible related to the services available to them as well as informing some policy guidance related to some of the measures that have been introduced today to support both workers and

businesses. and i wanted to just, again, for a quick moment to put on here the numbers and the information that we have set up to ensure that people have immediate access to individuals who can answer questions for them related to the impacts of services and resources that are being coordinated, not only by the city but by the state and by the federal government and by private enterprise. >> can you keep that up there? >> sure. and over to your staff as well, supervisor ronen, and i believe to all of you and your aides, supervisors, to ensure that you have this information. but eaodw.org is the way to get to our site, click on covid-9 and you'll see information where both employers and the employees for the up-to-date information as we have it and the public health order updates taking place and as well as new policy announcements that we're putting into place on a consistent basis to support our vitality here in

san francisco. just in terms of some of the programs that we have, may i go ahead and remove it -- okay. and, again, the simplest way to get access to that information is eaowd.org/covid919, to get that information out and if there's ideas that you have to get the information out on the ground and on the streets and in your districts, within your commercial districts for those small business needs our otherwise, please do not hesitate to share that with me or my staff directly. so we can get that information out there. in terms of some of the work that's been done to date, to begin to address the pleading that our businesses -- bleeding that our businesses are facing right now i want to talk about the small business resiliency fund which is a million dollar announcement that we made with supervisor peskin and your district in chinatown and many supervisors here. we have already had 300

applications. 300 applications which is onlyod by the million dollars in place. with my economic development directors across the country and in conversations with new york and portland and seattle and with denver today and chicago, and the advocacy that we are taking and learning from the best practices with each other and making sure that our programs are improving each time that one of us decides to make a decision so we can have a collective response and it's built on existing practices across the country. and that's something that we're focused on. for them alone they were expecting only a thousand people to reply to their program, very similar like this. within the first two hours, 500 small businesses reached out him immediately once it was announced. within two hours. so the demand is there. and there's currently the very

helpful news that has been out in terms of the s.b.a. disaster fund program for 3.75% loan, up to 2 million, again through the s.b.a. and all of our neighborhood economic organizations are aware of this and we're making sure that in time dealing with the new constraints that are on us related to the new public health order and around social distancing that we're exploring the best ways for us to engage the community i in doing that wk and where there are concerns we're thinking how to actively enhance our outreach and engagement so people can get the support they need tailored to who they are and who they report and what the cultural realities are of their businesses. so, again, a $2 million loan that is provided for that purpose. you have seen additional apkaigs allocations from the private sector and from our give to s.f.f. website and guided by the

policy team are better articulated on that site. so folks have an idea what we are prioritizing. what you have been hearing throughout this session and closed session, in terms of the significant demand that is out there and the needs that are faced across our communities and across areas, that we are determining how best to provide some direction, in addition to the priorities that individual donors have. in addition to that small business loan continuing, low interest loan programs are available to small businesses and our provider is main street launch. we are currently working on enhancing that loan portfolio with some of the redirected funds that we have within our office to help, again, once the small businesses respond to this extreme trauma they're facing right now. why do i say that? the conversations that i and my staff have been having at the highest levels in terms of business representation, not

only the chamber of commerce but the ethnic chambers, the african american chamber and the hispanic chamber and the filipino chamber and the chinese chamber making sure they are aware of the resources that we have and the members know that we're here to help them and to guide them through this process. and the hotel council and s.f. travel and others, constantly engaged with them. and as we have individuals and small businesses coming to us we're taking the time to spend time with them about the pains that they are facing to make sure that we understand how best to help them. and then also to let them know that despite the constant communication that we can walk them through simply in a blaze at times of very significant emotional feelings that people are having right now, which is very real for people, that we can kind of guide them through that process as well. so that has been a very large priority of mine and in making sure that we're as accessible as possible to our community members and making sure that all

of our people are aware on how to help them and how they can help us in terms of getting the word out. and just some -- just some examples. i want to show this graph in terms of, again, the demand that is coming to us. i don't know if this will show up. so you can see here -- i mean, the moment that we launched our page, how quickly the attraction to this site and the demand for information increased. in the hundreds of percentage points in terms of reaching out to our office and asking for support. and i do want to remind everyone that even with the constraints that we're under right now, while we were waiting to come up and present, there were still small businesses that are out there that are open and providing essential services and that need people's support. just before this, walking down the street to go visit dobbs, right there on hayes avenue and

abuelios to get some goods. and i want to remind people that there's more places than simply your large grocery stores that you can get basic amenities. and abuelos by my house and casa and others, please do take the time if you're a community member and to share with your members about where those resources are as well. and this afternoon people were telling me that the amount of traffic that they were receiving was finally beginning to quell and that's been good for them as well. and we are anxiously looking to see what the final approvals will be with regards to the paid sick leave program. we also recently announced where that is at the federal level. less than 500 employees -- less than 500 employees for businesses is what the government is looking to pay for, and after that is exhausted

and employees' services are exhausted, then we have a minimum wage compensation program for employers they can take advantage of as well and for those essential services up and running right now, that would be an important resource to continue operating in case anyone is exhibiting levels of sickness and they will be encouraged to stay home knowing that there's a resource out there for them. and in terms of some of the additional engagement that we have been doing, we have had our workforce online orientations and webinars and ensuring that people have access to those services especially when dealing with layoffs and they have questions. and we have been in partnership with the mayor's office to ensure that there are programs out there that are appropriately tailored to the real life needs that we're collecting based on our conversations with workers and with employers. you have seen the partnership that we've had with the controllers office, the treasure and tax collectors office, in

terms of coming up with delays in quarterly tax payments that the mayor has announced. the delay of the unified bills, and the conversations with our public utilities and the conversations with others that i know that some of you on the board of supervisors are actively working on to make sure that we have some relief there legislatively. in addition to the conversations that we have had across the country with companies providing online delivery services, and actively advocating to make sure they could lower their commissions and serve more folks who are actively in contact with them so that every dollar matters to these individuals and to ensure they have viable ways in which they could deliver their products. that all of us -- that all of us need. again, the web page, oewd.org and direct people there. and, again, please do reach out with any questions that you have. and just quick numbers and they're maybe insignificant at

this moment in time and the city's economist is actively coming up with more accurate numbers. but a quick snapshot before the public health order was enacted yesterday about -- in terms of jobs and businesses impacted, about 132,000 jobs, 11,000,000 businesses. we think that is not fully reflective of the realities that we're going to be facing. >> what is that number? >> this is an estimate. but currently -- and this is not indicative of the public health order effective as of midnight this morning. but 132,000 jobs. 11,000 businesses. so and ted is looking at indicators to figure out exactly where we are right now. and he will continue doing that work. and i know that supervisor fewer that you mentioned earlier about some of the work that new york was doing. we are actively pursuing those efforts at the state level as well. and, again, how to support our

restaurant industry and we're thinking about how to support the expansion of unemployment benefits and disability benefits and ensuring that people have additional relief like we as a city have provided and from the state level as well and we have performed that through the mayor's office in a strategic way. one-fourth of the calls that we have received -- i want to say it's a hundred or so calls and it could be more since i have been here, but one-fourth of those calls are related to independent contractors. in our discussions with the division director we have been told they'll be receiving -- they will be receiving calls and they want independent contractors who believe that they may not be able to benefit from unemployment insurance and disability insurance to still apply so that they're collecting that information and we'll see where that is going to go. and it's unclear yet and so we're asking for clarification there. but this is something that we're hearing right now. and something that i heard from

my director of workforce just a few hours ago. so still needing to get clarity on those pieces and i'll make sure that we can follow-up to give you that information as well. some examples of those folks who are reaching out, care giving, business owners and video production and the like. if there's any questions i'd be happy to answer them. >> yes, thank you for that, joaquin. and starting where you ended off with the independent contractors and pin talking to some high level folks at the california department of labor around 1:30, before the board meeting, they said that they were not aware of any programs or expansion of unemployment insurance for independent contractors. >> as of right now that's my understanding as well, and i did not get a claireific fro clarif,

and they said they wouldn't discourage people from applying. that's clarity that i'm seeking as well. >> are we thinking about any program locally to support independent contractors because, frankly, they won't make rent on april 1st and hopefully our moratorium on evictions will work and they won't be kicked out of their homes but that rent is going to accumulate and when this ends they won't have the money to pay rent. so they could be evicted at the end of this. so what, if any, programs are we looking at -- >> that's our next step. and i will be very, very happy to come back and provide an update once we have more clarity but that's the next area to look at. and we want to ensure in the initial phase we're focusing more holistically. and there's some populations to focus on granulely as well. and how those programs are structured we'll determine what

the best structure and the best resource would look like. >> and what time period are we looking at? because this is -- >> we are moving literally by the hour, by six-hour and three-hour increments? >> you'll get back toous that. and what about the immigrant workers? >> that's the next question as well and that's the exact type of programming that we want to work on at the same time and how those are conversations that we're having at the philanthropic level with the resources they may be able to provide based on priorities that we're hearing from donors. that i cannot name because i haven't been in direct conversation with those specific donors. but the issues that they have been bringing up specifically around what we'll do about domestic workers and what will we do about undocumented numbers of our community and how will they be supported holistically in the region. and how are our low-wage workers to survive in this environment when their lives are so fragile and people are living paycheck

to paycheck. and even before this began if people didn't have access to $400 or less money that they were at grave, grave danger of not being able to survive. here in this region. and so this is a comment, this is a priority and this is a statement and this is an observation that is constantly being shared in our policy conversations. >> fantastic. i would love to work with you on that if we could join forces. the next question about philanthropy. so we started with $1 million. where are we? how much has -- has the city given? you know, we are per capita we have more billionaires in san francisco than anywhere in the world. anywhere in the world. we have at least 75 billionaires that live right here. have any of them stepped up and offered to help? >> when's announced the s.f.

program, the first public announcement was from $1.5 million. and there's additional investments that i have been told that should be coming. i think that is more information that we can provide later on once we have more donations accepted through the give to s.f. fund and potentially other places, and the investments made. we saw earlier today that we're getting clarity on this $300 million investment that facebook made and we want to understand what that means for san francisco and our residents and small communities and our region. and more information like that will be coming down the pipe. and the more that -- a bit more time that we have, we can share more details on the work done there. >> do we have a prioritization where that money will go and once it comes in and where is that going? >> again, based on -- as we announced last week, those priorities need to be finalized through the policy team. of those conversations that are had right now because we're

working real-time, obviously about basic needs and basic security issues and basic stabilization issues for our small business owners and security for our low-wage workers. so we're developing those principles right now. >> okay, the more we have dialogue about that, because we can legistate all of this and, you know, if we're not hearing that there's concrete things that are happen, then we're going to just legistate it. >> got it. >> so it would be great to know in real-time what's happening here. >> i will make sure that in terms of the conversations that i am having that i can come and make sure that this board and you and your aides are aware of the work being done. again, it's really been a whirlwind. >> of course, of course. >> and it's been a short period of time but we'll continue to do that work to make sure that you're aware. >> so the $1 million -- >> $1.5 million -- i'm sorry -- $1 million. >> the $1 million for the micro business loans that you have 300 applications so far.

have we increased that fund at all? >> no, no, but that's a conversation that we'll have later on this week. >> okay. and the s.p.a. disaster, are you talking about the federal program? >> yes, the federal program requires a state of emergency that is signed by the governor's office to access those funds and that work has taken place. i believe that we have received, i would to say between mid 20s and early 30s applications right before i came into this room. >> but they're processed locally, is that how it works? >> so we have helped them through those who are partners of the s.b.a. so all organizations like working solutions, cameo, and other community-based organizations that are in conversation with the s.b.a. and partner with the s.b.a., they can help to process the applications. and organizations like meta and others. >> so they have access to that $20 million and they -- >> up to $ 2 million per business. >> sorry, up to $2 million per

business and sort of unlimited funds? >> we haven't been made aware of what the conscriptions are with that fund. >> i see. so we don't know what the requirements are to access it? >> no, the requirements are all listed on our website. you can go and see through the disaster loan information that is there right now. and for the particulars in terms of those individual businesses that want to know how to access them, they can know that there's local community providers that should be reaching out to businesses right now and we get phone calls and people want to begin that application process, like the mid 20s to early 30s that we received so far, we're directing them to our partners or the local partners to be walked through that process. >> by way of example, the 300 applications that we received, would they be eligible for those? >> yes. >> they would. and is it high -- do they need to -- are they secure? >> they are personal guarantees. that's a question that i have to

come back on. i'm blanking on that right now. >> it would be great when we have a hearing on the legislation that i introduced today authorizing the treasurer to take out $20 million loan to in turn then loan it to small businesses at no interest with very few requirements so that we can turn it around fast. how that might interact with this. because it is my understanding that the requirements are quite onerous and that many businesses won't be able to meet those requirements. >> it's not just requirements themselves, i think that as we're talking about that the time that we're trying to buy here in terms of stabilizing businesses, that that becomes a very important pra parameter and lens through which to look at this. and the time that we have initiate relief at this period across the board that can fill

this gap as people who are eligible for those s.b.a. loans. when those come on. and that's a period of time i'm told right now between six and eight weeks for that to come online. so there is going to be a need to fill them. >> okay, thank you. and then last question -- the small business assistance center phone number and the worker info line that you just gave us. is there a live person answering those calls? >> yes, on two occasions -- please tell me if you're not having this experience yourselves, given the changes that just happened, we're having those calls forwarded to another line so people can access them on site and making sure that our employees are appropriately in place and functioning with the phones, etc., to receive those calls. if it goes straight to voicemail there's multiple languages to go back to the website and to leave a message so that our teams can get back to them.

if you're hearing that individuals are not getting a response in a timely manner that's something that i want to be aware of immediately. >> fantastic. it's great news that it's a live person. thank you. >> president yee: supervisor walton. >> thank you, president yee and thank you. just jumping in on that last question about a live person being there. and i understand that there might be a lot of calling being fielded right now and you said that there's the ability to leave a message. do you have a timeframe in terms of response time, in terms of when your team is getting back to workers? >> that's something that we need to look at. and i have not heard complaints yet -- yet -- about the response time. i believe that it's been pretty much in real-time and almost immediately when people were getting phone calls back or at least within the same day in which they called. if that's an issue and you hear anecdotally that someone is not

getting a response that's something that we'd like to know about directly. >> we have the ability of people leaving messagin messages and ne answering and it would be great to be able to communicate with people in terms of what we think that the expectation of a response should be. >> thank you. >> we understand that there's a lot of calls coming in. typical response time is this, if that's possible. and then the second thing how are workers connected to child care? we have been getting calls about frontline workers and low-income workers who have not either received information about child care and how to access it and some have received information and they're going in and they're wait listed. what is the situation there for us to try to make sure that our families are connected to child care during this crisis? >> i'm going to need to get back

to you on the immediate information there and i'll get back to you as soon as i can, supervisor. >> it's not necessarily your department. >> it's holistic and i have to say that it takes a lot of us understanding what the demands and needs are holistically and the services provided through other departments to make sure that we're well integrated across the board. and making sure that we're aware of what each one of us have the power to do. that's a work that we're continuing to do. >> president yee: right before the -- what was the question, did you say something about child care? >> i asked the question in terms of that we know that we have child care set aside for frontline workers and low-income families and they're supposed to be contacted. some have been contacted and some haven't. and ones that have been contacted are being wait listed as well. >> so i pointed out on the advertisement for that, it says

child care, and for a lot of people they think in terms of 0 to 5 for child care instead of school-aged. what we're talking about in reality is that they have worked out a system for the 6 to 12th grade i believe which would be located at rec centers. and the kindergarten to 5th, i believe is located at libraries. i know that i might as well say this. there was an issue -- i don't know if you were involved in this discussion this morning, i believe, i pointed out -- and this is the beauty of o.e.c e.od being able to visit it and to mention some issues around child care and in which there was really mixed messages to them.

you know, on the one hand we're talking about social distancing and we're talking about, you know, 50 -- i don't know what the numbers are anymore, but on the other hand we have a lot of the providers that are over 65 years old and especially in family daycare and so i pointed out an issue for -- to dr. co fax and also to mary ellen carol, and that the fact that we are sending out mixed messages and not declaring that these are things that should be closed according to our policies. it means that they lose out on a lot of money. the state won't reimburse them if they close down because they're saying that the city is not declaring they need to close down. and because they're closing down, and they will get

reimbursed from the city, because it's considered at one point an essential service, which is advertised and everyone is sending out here's essential services similar to policing and nurses and doctors and medical people. and we're talking about, you know, basically the minimum wage folks. so i hope they worked on that and i believe that they're going to declare something. and i just wanted you to know that if you're not involved in that, that it does impact workers. even before this, there was really like a revolt by child care centers, over a hundred already said that even though they're going to lose out on money, they can't do it right now. and we're talking about throughout san francisco. and i'm sure that every district is impacted with that. and one of the nice things is

that the city asked whether any centers would be willing -- even though they close down -- to provide just like the libraries, just like the rec and park, whether anybody would voluntarily open up for essential workers. so hopefully there's a view for that. if it's not clear in the next few days where they promised that it would be done, that would be legislation that i'd like to introduce to make it happen. >> okay. >> president yee: supervisor safai. >> so i just want to thank you director torres, and to ask you on the record and we talked a bit offline about this and had a lot of calls about seniors

wanting to figure out ways to get groceries, and essential items. so i know that mandelman and ronen and myself we got posts on social media ca and calls todayd reached out to ufcw and working with your staff and i have a call set up on the way home. i wanted to just hear a little bit of about what you have planned or started to do in terms of ensuring that vulnerable populations, in particular seniors have access to groceries and essential items. >> certainly. and jeff was talking a little bit about using the existing resources that are in place and partners that are already engaged in ensuring that vulnerable populations have access to food. he talked about some of the expansion of the conversations with partners like meals on wheels. and in my conversation with them

after you and i had that conversation and, supervisor, that my understanding is that there's a vulnerable populations working group through the human services agency department operation center. that is looking at this. we're expecting to get brought into that conversation shortly. and we can be brought into that. and we have flagged it. and so there's also some additional support that i understand that the national guard is providing and waiting for more clarity on that and we should have more answers for you shortly. >> supervisor mar. >> i'm sorry, just to follow up on that, in terms of working with h.s.a. community partners to get a volunteer system in place, to help to address those issues as well around how we can make those delivery models more accessible to folks. >> thank you, president yee. i wanted to just thank you director torres and all of the

work that you and your team have done in coordinating work to create programs to support the wide range of businesses and residents that are going to be -- starting to be and willer severely be impacted by this health and economic crisis. and the web page compiling all of the different programs is a great resource. and we have been sharing that out a lot. and, you know, it was good to hear that you said that you are -- there are efforts to work on programs that are specifically addressing the needs of the most vulnerable workers, undocumented workers, and then the independent contractors, particularly the gig workers, because they're misclassified by their employer and they're ineligible for a lot of the existing benefits, existing and new ones that are being created. so, yeah, i also look forward to

working with you on that and i have been in meetings. i did have some questions about the paid sick leave, sick benefit and paid leave program that the mayor announced this week and i think that is a positive step forward. in fact, i just introduced a resolution today with supervisor haney urging expanded paid leave for workers, you know, during public health emergencies. and urging congress and the state government to enact those expanded leave. but for unpaid leave program, i was a little -- or i just had questions about the provisions -- like, first of all it's structured as more of an incentive to employers and to offer additional paid leave, a week of additional paid leave, versus as a mandate that employers should provide it. so i was just wondering what the thinking was around that?

and as well as, i also -- i understand that there's $10 million that is in a fund right now for this -- the i incentive to employers. but it looks like only 20% of the funding is supposed to go to small businesses. so that means 80% of thedering e $10 million goes to large businesses. i'm wondering what the thinkingt t around that and that is out of line for what most of the proposals have been around expanded paid leave which has weeks of paid leave emplowould be a mandate on employers with financial suppora targeted -- targeting small business businesses and medium-sizeded sinesses and businesses and not the l businesses. >> first let me say, supervisor, that this is designed to be a very nimble program so we're responding in real-time. it's also focused on the individual -- excuse me -- focused on the individual, the low-wage worker as well in addition to small businesses.

so we may -- once we see where the application levels are coming in and an understanding from a further perspective for those small businesses operating and who can provide paid sick leave, where the pressure points are for them. so this is not a set in stone program. and we will look at who is actually coming forward. and one of the reasons that we designed it this way in terms of a minimum wage component here was so that when there are opportunities to support low-wage workers that the nexus between the minimum wage worker and the support that is provided for them and a nexus between them and what their actual hourly wage is, that there's an incentive for them to come forward. and it would skew towards supporting low-wage workers. again, it's not static. it's meant to be a nimble program. and we'll assess it as it continues. and there are large employers who do have part-time employees and lower wage employees and we'll look at those granulely as those application comes in to

see what support can be provided to them as well. >> and so thanks for that explanation. yeah, i look forward to seeing how the actual uptick and participation of the program looks like. but did you -- did you consider structuring it more as a direct mandate on employers and expanded paid leave -- which is what i think is called for. and even the current democratic leadership, you know, in congress have proposed with financial support for small and mid-sized businesses to comply? >> not at this time. i think that also because of the economic pressures that employers are facing across the board right now, the pressures that those individual employers would be facing in any situation, especially, i mean, in this particular situation, is important to pay attention to. so we will be seeing again and assessing how the applications come in and the various

conversations with employers. but i do encourage, please, more of these questions and if you're hearing that this program is not working in a way that you think is best to serve those vulnerable members who are looking, again, to ensure they have similar leave and employers have the opportunity to say to their employees if they're not feeling well as their work is continuing, that they have an area where they can provide relief. >> great, thank you. and i just had a question around the small business support. >> yes. >> and i had a meeting with about a dozen sunset district businesses earlier today and, you know, i heard directly from them about the challenges that they're facing. i think that they made it pretty clear to me that while some of the programs that have been set up like the deferral of taxes and license fees and the different types of loan programs that are being made available are certainly helpful, what's

really needed is direct financial assistance right now. otherwise, you know, a lot of them and many businesses in the city are really going to go under in the next -- in the coming weeks really. >> that's right. so . >> so i think that the small business resilience fund is what is really needed. and it's great that it started up like you said even in the short time that it's been set up. and we've already gotten three times more applications for it than we have funding for. and even just based o on going f the figure that you said there's a projected 11,000 businesses that are impacted right now in the city. and that was before the -- you know, the recent escalated actions. and if you're looking at $10,000 of support to those 11,000 businesses that comes out to $110 million. so i guess that my question is

what is the plan to really have the resources that are necessary to provide that direct support to small businesses that are really under threat of going under right now in our city? >> that's a conversation that we're having from an economic perspective with the treasurer and tax collector and the budget office and the budget director where we'll draw from as a city and also as a community in terms of what the business community can provide as well. and the resources that they can bring to bear to support the small business community as we consider all of the priorities in the city. obviously, very much so as you have seen me do consistently, advocating for the needs of the small business community and i will continue to do so to make sure in policy conversations that the weight of the pressures that these business owners are experiencing are present in the room when we're having these policy conversations. thank you. >> thank you. >> two more, supervisor haney

and -- >> all right, i'll be quick. first you are doing a great job and i know that you have a lot coming at you and you have a small team and impressed by the work that you're doing. so thank you. >> thank you. >> we just saw the governor put out something today where he thinks that the schools are going to be closed in california through the summer. so the amount of time that we were thinking in terms of people needing to figure out how they're going to take care of their kids, potentially it's extended a lot longer. one of the things that i think that would be helpful for us to do, and maybe it comes from the state or not, is to provide clear guidance to families and parents about how they should approach applying for benefits, what rights they have to assert at the workplace, you know, all of those things that really hasn't been out there. i know this is the first week of it, but to a degree that if there's something that you could prepare that with the school district that is specifically for parents or caregivers to be

provided for them, that is something that is their rights to prepare and what their rights are and what benefits they can claim. and the other quick things, and for people continuing to work like people who work at grocery stores and walgreens and things like that, and that may be and putting their own health at risk, have we thought as a city that we're thinking about this for our non-profit workers but and with emergency powers to make sure they're still on the frontlines and going into work, particularly if -- it's okay if you haven't thought about those

things. >> if i may supervisor, yes, it is something that we have thought about and some of the questions that we have, i have been encouraged by the businesses that i have been visiting in terms of the direction that they're providing, not only to their staff it seems, again, it seems that in addition to members of the public who come in to have directions about social distancing as people are entering a place of business and certainly we have seen that in some neighborhood grocery stores as well in terms of the amount of people that they're letting in and larger grocery stores as well as with the number of people they're allowing in to make sure that there's a ability to practice the distancing here and asking people from a public health perspective to take the best practices very deeply to heart and also to follow the intent of the order themselves. and there's more to do there. and as it relates, absolutely, i think that it's essential in our communications with the next step and, again, thinking about taking a few steps back now that you have the governor of

california telling us that -- on how we plan for that to make sure that we have the right investment, strategies and plans in place to help people -- to help people through this. >> and just last thing, again, just something that you might look into, i know that we're not really at a place yet -- and we will get into this place of thinking how to get people back into the workforce, particularly as we hear that maybe unemployment is going to go up and sooner than later you might have some companies that are in certain categories and such who actually are going to be interested in hiring at this time or having people work remotely or there's some opportunities that may be coming in later, but i'm just wondering about all of the people who are just, you know, we'r were workig somewhere and they're out and they'd like to be working right now or at least in the near future. >> that's a conversation, again, that is one of the pillars of our next steps as we think about

immediate steps and short-term mitigation measures that you want to put in place. and that we have already put in place. what are the longer term recovery actions that we need to think about and we have begun to have some of those conversations and thinking about the best and the appropriate structure should look like for doing so. what the engagement is from other partners, not only within the city and with the city proper but from our university system to make sure that we're drawing on the best practices and the thoughts that people have regionallily and even nationally on how to do this work. so absolutely. >> again, thank you, i appreciate you and i'm grateful that you're in this role at this challenging time. >> thank you very much, supervisor. >> supervisor mandelman? >> yep, thank you director for all of your work and your accessibility and availability and a lot of people in city government right now you're confronted with the needs that far exceed your and our collective capacity and it's heartbreaking and hard and you're continuing on to try to address them and so thank you for that.

>> thank you. >> i think that supervisor haney raises an interesting point and there are many industries and occupations, including in city government that have been really been hurting for applicants in the last, you know, year, months, years and so there may be opportunities going forward to connect people up with opportunities that are, you know, like safeway posting 2,000 new positions where they're hiring and there was more that i was talking to a business that is open in my district, and, you know, a food serving business that is, you know, has a lot -- still is hiring. so i think that there are jobs out there. some of what we may be able to do is to connect people with jobs. i also just wanted to -- since we had a conversation about grocery stores to brag on a grocery store in my district, canyon market, which i just heard that is opening up 7:00 to 8:00 in the morning for seniors

to do their shopping. and so good on you, canyon market. and then we've also been in conversation in the last 24 hours with safeway and whole foods, i think that they are similarly doing -- making arrangements for senior-only hours to allow folks who are having to shelter in place but maybe are in a vulnerable group to get their shopping done. so my hope is that by the time that we vote on our resolution that there will be a thank you to all of these good actors in the grocery industry who have stepped forward in the next week to create these opportunities for people who are potentially health compromised to get their -- to get their food. >> that's right. thank you. >> thank you. and i just want to echo supervisor haney's complements tcompcomp liments toyou. a quick question about sick leave. can you explain how workers would access it and given how

many workers are most likely going to be laid off, do we expect that there's a major portion of the workforce left that will be eligible for this sick leave program? >> well, as you can see, i don't have the full data numbers but i can bring those to you in a later time just in terms of the essential services. i think that is a great focus right now, especially as supervisor haney was saying with the populations of the businesses that will provide these essential services and the jobs that they're creating. again, you wanted to have an opportunity so that employers are saying that i want to keep you on and you're not feeling well and you should not be coming in and i have a resource for you and that's why there's the importance of what the numbers of paid sick time that an individual business has for their employee and drawing down on the federal government's program for those 80 hours and see how that looks like and how that applies to our folks. and the next step of having 40 hours available for individuals

should the employer pay for those employees within those essential services. that is one of the next steps as we take a very short breath to look at what we have been rushing to put together that is beneficial for folks and what to do to invest in those areas. >> so someone wanted to take advantage of this today, how would they do it? >> so, for example, let's say that there's -- well, a barbershop is closed. there's a employer who is doing the federal program. and the next step is that as we receive applications that i

don't believe that we have yet or questions about the paid sick leave question as of yet, and is that those employers are reaching out to say that i'm interested in the program because it would be a reimbursement of the payment that the employer made to the employee and this is a partnership between our office and h.s.a. and olsc, and the office of labor standards and enforcement. and, again, we're building up this application so that we have it ready for folks so you can see it and, again, any guidance or thoughts, and we are really pushing hard ahead here so any kind of considerations that you have about this are welcome as well. >> great. and just the last question, before i let you go -- could my office and maybe -- i don't want to volunteer supervisor mar but i know this is something that we have both been working on closely and any other sup office that wants to join -- to join you in creating an official work

group around non-traditional workers, independent contractors and immigrant workers, the workers not eligible for unemployment insurance so that we can collectively brainstorm how we're going to assist them through this period? i know that many organizations from the community would like to have a place to do that strategy and to give their input and their expertise. >> we have begun to hear from some constituents in your district specifically. it was almost like it just happened after i had asked the staff to check in with the program to find out what they're hearing from folks as well. how they're faring right now. and then almost immediately after we heard from the economic development agencies in your district who reached out to find out where there's opportunities to have these conversations. and the same from chinatown and my conversations with the new director malcolm young and i'm having those conversation as well. >> we would love to be at the

table with you and to be brainstorming that. thank you. >> thank you all. >> thank you. >> supervisor ronen, what would you like to do -- continue or -- keep on talking -- because everybody -- >> i know that everyone -- >> everyone is not present. >> first of all, thank you so much to all of my colleagues. i think that this is really important to be able to have this open session and to discuss it. and it looks like matt is ready to jump and to get out of here. but i wanted to just have a moment longer if you would indulge me to have a discussion amongst ourselves about what, if anything, that your office is working on. so that we can make sure that we're not duplicating efforts. you're saying no. and that we're working together as opposed to both working on the same thing.

i mean that everybody's time is so limited and important right now and i feel like we should be working more collaboratively than we ever have before. so i, you know, just gave away aside from the legislation that i introduced to help small businesses, i really want to be looking at and concentrating and working around independent contractors and immigrant workers and basically the workforces that are left out of the state and federal programs. so that's something that i'm going to be focusing in on. if anybody else wants to chime in with areas that they're looking at, that they're trying to specialize, so that we know who to call and start working together with, i'd love to hear from any of you who want to share what it is that you're focusing on at the moment. >> quickly from me -- a lot of things as i have mentioned about the child care thing and it went

directly and then have them fix it. and i would be -- i think that several people mentioned seniors and for me i'm not working on any specific thing, but it's my interest, and once i get from te field itself what is not working, that's when i'd come up with solutions. so, again, you know, i'm interested in working on that and nothing specific but if anybody else is interested we could put our head together and come up with solutions. supervisor mar? >> yeah, so, again, i have been working on some of the worker impacts issues, in particular the independent contractors and the gig workers and also with supervisor haney. and then also the expanded paid

leave. we're seeing if there's gaps -- some gap that we still need to fill here locally that will be not covered by the state and federal legislation moving forward. >> thank you. yeah, a couple things. i've been working with supervisor mar on gig workers and ride-share drivers and folks who are kind of in that space, and so it sounds like there's an overlap for us to work together there around the expanded leave as well. and then also homelessness and folks who are in supportive housing, shelters and navigation centers and spending a lot of time thinking about that and how to get people off the street and into shelter or into a housing. and also bathrooms and hygiene at the time when we have so many people still on the streets and how do we get them access to

more bathrooms and wash stations and things that really ensure as much cleanliness as possible. i mentioned it earlier that i'm thinking a bit about folks who are continuing to work right now. so if you're working at a grocery store, kind of how we are dealing with some of the labor issues there. and then as many of you are thinking also about schools and families a bit, i have some particular populations that are having challenges right now. so treasure island in particular is very isolated and so we're working together to try to make sure that they have access to food and addressing food insecurity and some of the different areas of my district. >> i think that we can fulfill a useful function for our constituents in getting information out as quickly as we can and so i have my legislative aides that are doing a lot of responding to emails from people who have questions and doing --

trying to do as much social media as we can and put out newsletters as appropriate. i am trying to figure out, you know, i that it will be hard going forward -- the right balance between pressing on things that i think are important and not making a system which is super stressed right now even more stressful for all of those who are participating in it. and so i -- you know, i -- yesterday i found out that like i think that a lot of us did that the order that went out on sheltering in place for a moment -- well, the guidance went out that they would have to close and i felt that it was worth some intervention. and i did intervene. but as i think that a number of us did and we got a better outcome out of it today. but i also feel like in terms of legislation or pushing on ideas, i'm somewhat trying to restrain myself in recognition of the

limited capacity of our city attorney and also the fact if i try to talk about public health with anybody in the public health department i'm taking them away from, you know, the things they really must address. so i think that is not to say that we don't weigh in. i think that supervisor peskin recognized a couple weeks ago the need to start planning for people on s.r.o.s and had an impact in the city planning for that and i think that it was necessary but i also think that we also need to be a bit aware of kind of that balance. and then i think that, lastly, as a member of the budget committee that i think we are heading into a budgetary situation that is worse than maybe supervisor peskin thought in the great recession. but i don't think -- i'm not sure that anybody else -- some of the legends saw it, i guess, but i think that it's going to be worse. i think it's going to be amazingly awful and we're going to be having conversations about how do we prioritize the things

that we absolutely have to be, you know, for the most vulnerable and the most dependent on public services, and i think that those are the hard conversations that i think we're going to be having when we are -- as we emerge, when we emerge from the public health crisis aspect of this. or maybe in tandem with it. so i am, you know, i think that is going to be a set of very unpleasant conversations that i don't look forward to. >> supervisor peskin. >> thank you, mr. president. to you and your office and to the city attorney, albeit we've had a few unpleasant interactions in recent time, thank you for the closed session and the open session and thank you to all of my colleagues for having what i think is a very, very important dialogue in the biggest crisis that any of us will face. and thank you to the department heads and the representatives of

the mayor's office who participated over the last many hours. yeah, we have a financial crisis. and, yes, we don't print money and our money will ultimately be limited. but i totally concur with all of you and all of us and i think that we are first responders in a certain sort of way. but most of our people who actually have access to the internet, most of our people who are english speaking people of certain means, will be able to garner this information. our actual jobs, individually and collectively, as supervisors, and as a city, is to communicate with those people who are the hardest people to

communicate with over social media, and over the internet, and over email and we're going to have to do that door-by-door, hand-by-hand at six feet apart. and those are the people that we actually have to help save. so i think that is actually as we stratify what we're doing within our offices, i can blast out the same stuff that all 10 of you can blast out and we're all doing a great job at that, but we've got to actually go find our folks in chinatown, our folks in the valley and our folks on irving street and our folks on clement street. that is actually what we all have to do right now. and i love all you guys and this is a pretty weird situation. >> supervisor? >> thank you, president yee. just the same in terms of the

work that we'll all do together. of course i'm going to be supporting our protections and making sure that our small businesses are whole and looking at basic income resources for the undocumented populations and for low-income families that don't typically receive a certain level of resources, so they can be sustained through this crisis that we have in front of us right now. those are the things that we'll see from my office and we'll continue to have conversations about that. >> supervisor safai? >> thank you. so many of the things that you are all doing in terms of dealing with your constituents, i think that there's a lot of overlap. i know that we talked a little bit about the simple things but also simple in the sense that it sounds simple to talk about but difficult to implement which is getting groceries to seniors or vulnerable populations that are asked to stay in their house. so thinking about that. and a lot that i have responded

to is around organized labor and working with organized labor in all capacities, whether it's nurses or ensuring that we did in terms of hiring, whether it's construction workers and how they'll be impacted by the shutdowdown, which construction workers are working on projects that are essential or not essential. and we had conversations about housing construction in general. and the building department is shut down right now. so whether there is an effective order to stop all construction, if there's no inspectors in the field, there is no construction happening. although been in good communication with our city administrator and they're working on plans on how to adjust that to ensure that the right people are there and right orders are there. so she and i have communicated a few times today. and the planning department as well. but housing will be prioritized in all forms. whether it's one unit, up to, you know, 250, but they want to

keep that going. including those in the pipeline. and how that affects people that are in the business of building. also talking with the teamsters and in understanding how the orders impact their daily lives in terms of garbage collection and what times of day. and there's conversations about when that will happen. so you should be prepared. i'm sure that saw? some information that went out that the routes would start earlier than they have in general. and some of the -- so essentially -- you know, and today now talking about the bus drivers and those that are doing that work and ensuring that they're safe and the buses are clean and things all around organized labor and many of the things that other supervisors have talked about -- immigrants, and seniors and child care providers. and those that are the most

vulnerable. so to supervisor peskin's point, to look at how the staff and myself can help to support those in need in our district. thank you. >> supervisor stefan. >> thank you, president yee. i'm definitely focused on messaging everything that we can in a way that is coherent and cohesive and everything from the mayor's office. but i am paying particular attention and acknowledging that this is a particularly difficult time for those that suffer from anxiety, depression and addiction. and i want to make sure that i am communicating resources to those who do suffer from all of this because this is a time where it's anxiety producing for anybody. and if you suffer from depression, it's really hard to

look forward into the future and wonder when this is going to stop. and addiction, i have to tell you that knowing people that rely on meetings for their sobriety and those meetings aren't there and making sure that i can connect people to resources. we have the mental health hotline which is 855-845-7415 and we have the suicide 415-781-0500. and, of course, we're in a shelter in place situation and not everyone has a home that is easy to be in. and if you are co-quarantined with an abuser and worried about having to self-isolate in a dangerous home situation, i want to make sure that people know about the national domestic hotline at 800-799-7233. and, finally, again, with regard to addiction and alcohol and

drug addiction, just making sure that people know that there's free help out there with alcohols anonymous and narcotics anonymous and online meetings at weconnectrecovery.com and there are people that can help. you're not alone. there's no shame in needing help for all of these things. it is okay to be anxious. it is okay to be depressed. and certainly it's okay to have an addiction that you're trying to recover from. so i just want to know -- people to know that i'm really trying hard to reach out and to connect people to services. we have empty beds right now in our health department that can connect people to recovery programs. we have many empty beds. and i am working with people to make sure that i can reach out to communities and to get those beds filled. and, finally, something that i'm doing with my kids is that we're focusing in on acts of kindness.

and we said the other day that this is very contagious, but kindness is also contagious. and acknowledging all of the people in my district that are reaching out and helping people and engaging in acts of kindness because we don't have time to be mean to one another. we don't have time to be testy with one another. this is a time when we must be kind and i am glad that my children and i are really making sure that we make an effort to every night to talk about where we are seeing acts of kindness. and i have to say one more thing, gigi and i watched the mr. rogers movie last night and there's that thing, what does he say to kids -- when you're in a situation like this, you look for the helpers. and we're looking for the helpers. and i am so happy to be on this board where i know that all of you, all of my colleagues who, like i love, and maybe you don't all love me, but i do -- and i

really -- we're in this together. and we're all helpers. and really i'm glad that we have had these hearings. i think that all of us are in public service because we love it and all of the department heads that we saw today we want to help. and i will be focusing on this. so thank you supervisor ronen. >> supervisor peskin? >> thank you, president yee. and thank you to president yee and supervisor ronen and supervisor peskin for calling for these and leading these discussions today. i think that it's really important. and i think that as a new supervisor i'll tell you that one of the most wonderful things is the brown act and one of the most frustrating things in our state is the brown act and to casually have conversations with so many important things that we all need to collectively discuss. so i appreciate this forum for us to get some of those conversations going outside of one-on-one or small group

meetings. i want to echo and really appreciate a couple comments that supervisor stefani just made with acts of kindness around this time and folks suffering from mental health issues and anxiety and depression. i think that it's hard enough for folks who are not suffering from mental health issues to process all that's going on, and it's that much harder for folks who are, and so i appreciate you listing those resources and acknowledging folks who are really struggling in this time. so i don't think that it is -- you know, i don't think that it's a secret that certainly the housing first model that dr. argon talked about resonates very much with me. i mean, right now it's health care and health care workers. and in housing. and in homelessness issues that

i'm primarily focused on with incredible amounts of overlap between those. some of it we have already been moving on and i'm committed to making sure that we have no evictions during this time at all and that we're moving folks from homelessness into vacant units around the city. also working on a number of issues around small businesses that we have talked about, both in terms of eviction protection and in terms of the fund that supervisor ronen has been leading on. and i also am looking at and look forward to collaborating with folks on the broader issue of protecting folks, not just in evictions but protecting folks from being taken advantage of during this time, and very concerned around price gouging issues and consumer protection and things that we have only seen the beginnings of, and particularly if this is

prolonged that we'll see more. and i think there's a lot to do on that front as well. and then just more broadly what we have been doing, and i look forward to comparing notes with folks on what's working and what's effective is on the outreach side. so we have been calling every senior facility in district 5, all places of worship in district 5. we're moving on now to cutting lists of seniors individually and having one-on-one calls with folks in the district. and i really do believe that the beauty of district representation is that we're able to do that. we have a relatively manageable group of people to reach out to. so we're doing that by phone and we're going to also be launching virtual office hours and some other ways that folks can participate and meet online. so as i said, i really would

welcome hearing in the upcoming days what is working for folks and what are effective ways that when we're not able to meet face-to-face with our constituents in the same way that folks are able to meaningfully connect. thank you. >> supervisor fewer? >> so my office has been really been concentrating deeply on building a safety net around my constituents and my neighborhood. a couple years ago we launched one in richmond which has four basic concepts. one of them is we take care of each other. so we have a website that we already had all of the community-based organizations that have joined. so we have listings of them. and we have also about 3,000 of our constituents who have joined in the community and then we have also have had about over a hundred small businesses. but we have been having almost daily phone calls, conference calls, with all of the

organizations like c.b.o.s which actually serve the senior population in my district. so we have been coordinating around meals, meal delivery, what everybody is doing and how they're augmenting their programs and we're plugging in support and giving out information. but we're the conduit to the one richmond website that we direct everyone to to help small businesses and communities and posts for volunteerism and the most up-to-date information about the vs the coronavirus ane things that are happening within the district to impact them. i feel that it is my main responsibility as an elected official that the people of my district are depending on me to be a leader and also in times of panic and in fear to know that they are not alone, that weigh are in this -- we are in this together and we will get through this but we have to work together to do it. so we're doing a campaign around how to keep -- to obey, quite

frankly, or adhere to the public health guidelines. i think that what we heard today in closed session but also in the public session, is that the main thing is to get the word out there so that people comply and people actually are following the rules of what we know has worked in other countries and other communities to actually to help stop the spread of this virus. and i feel that in my district i have a lot of vulnerable people and it is my job to put a safety net around them so they're fully informed, they are supported, and they are supported by each other also. and so in this time when public health and all of these departments are working on these huge, huge issues, housing thousands and thousands of vulnerable people and finding hospital beds i find that what i can contribute is to keep this community of 80,000 people safe

to have a safety net around them and so -- and also that they are not overburdening our system with a lot of phone calls and also i have as i said a lot of seniors in my neighborhood trying to keep them also connected through phone trees and phone banks. but also just trying to keep everyone fed and making sure they have resources. as chair of your budget committee we're still doing meetings via telephone now, with groups that want to meet with us around budget. i think that chelsea in my office has 15 meetings set up to talk about the budget. as your budget chair i feel that my office does 10 times the work of your offices around been. it is going -- budget. it is going to be completely challenging this time because in years past as you know that we have been adding things and it looks as though the outlook is not good and we will have to

cut. and that is always a very, very hard thing i think for all of us to do. and a lot of those decisions i think come down to our budget committee. so i just want to say that i think that during this time though that it is about unity. i think that about working together. and this is a very scary time in san francisco. but it's a very scary time in our nation. and also in the world. and in san francisco, as i said before, you know, this is -- when we're put to the test we perform. and i think that we'll be fine. i just want to also express to president yee that i am happy to have my office take a shift down at e.o.c. and help participate in that effort. thank you. and thank you to everyone for everything that they're doing. >> supervisor ronen? >> yeah, i just want to thank you all. i got a lot of just great ideas in terms of the district and constituent work.

so just agreeing with supervisor preston that if we can hear back from each other how those straft gees are going i -- strategies are going i think that would be helpful. in terms of our budget chair, supervisor fewer, a lot of the items that we're going to bring forward are going to cost money. and so i'm wondering if we can start to come up with some principles in the budget committee about sort of how we're going to prioritize, where we're going to add money and subtract money? because those are -- this is not -- i can't say that? >> i'm not an attorney but an attorney would stand up and say that you can't say that.

>> so the item that we're still in the middle of it is the hearing and i think that we've heard from the people who are asked to speak and the conversation is going beyond the scope of the notice item now that we're talking about different budget opportunities and budget solutions. >> okay, i thought that it was the city's response to the covid virus, the covid-19 virus which is all-encompassing and the notice says the city of the whole. but, anyway, i said what i needed to say there. so, again, thank you president yee and to the clerk staff for making this happen. i know that it's really late and you all want to go home so i appreciate it. >> we still have a few more items. to remind everyone here, we have a few more options. >> clerk: public comment? >> seeing none public comment is closed. ooh i'll make a motion to file this item. >> the motion passes to file the

item. let's go to our 3:00 -- 3:00 item. number 16 i believe. >> clerk: item 16 is a hearing of the board of supervisors sitting as a committee of the whole on march 17, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. for the members of the board to hear and receive specific findings with police staffing city-wide and to request that the budget analysts to report. >> okay. here comes the matrix. colleagues, i was going to continue this item. so we'd like to continue this item, this hearing to the board of supervisors meeting on april 6, 2020. i can have a motion. >> moved. >> clerk: and we'll take public comment when you are ready.

>> supervisor walton, did you say move? >> i did move the motion. >> thank you. is there a second? supervisor ronen. and on this item any public comments? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we take this motion, same house, same call? so the item is continued to april 17th, 2020. madam clerk, let's go to the agenda. >> clerk: items 19-24 with adoption without resolution to the committee. and on first reading alternatively a member may require a resolution to go to committee. >> okay. can we take these items same house, same call? seeing no objection, then these motions are -- are passed. resolutions are passed.

what else do we have? >> clerk: on behalf of president yee we have an imperative item, a motion concurring in the actions taken by the mayor on march 11, 2020, and march 13, 2020, to meet the ongoing local emergency related to the novel coronavirus pandemic declared on february 25, 2020. >> we have an item to have the board to adopt two separate findings unanimously. adoption on the item itself, let's take the findings first. a motion then to find this resolution is imperative as to threatening serious injury to the public interest and thus meeting the standards of sunshine ordinance, made by supervisor walton and seconded by supervisor stefani. and without objection -- >> can we have a discussion on that item? i'm not going to object to

sunshine or brown, but i do have quite a number of questions for the city attorney. and i refer to this earlier relative to our powers and authorities. but i'm happy to concur with sunshine and brown. >> okay, let me do that first and then we'll get to the item itself. so is there any -- without objection then, this finding is accepted. now to the brown act finding, is there a motion that finds the need to take action? and bringing to the attention of the board after the agenda was posted and thus the motion meets the standards of the brown act. motion made by supervisor walton and seconded by supervisor peskin. and without objection, this finding is accepted. we must now take public comment on this item. is there any member of the public who wishes to speak on

the imperative item? seeing none, public comment is closed. and now the assessment of the imperative motion itself, supervisor peskin? >> so, mr. president, colleagues, before i even ask the questions that i have, insofar as it was almost impossible for non-elected officials to come into this building, were any members of the public actually able to come to this meeting? we saw a couple people earlier, but i'd like to ask that question for the record. >> madam clerk, is that yours to answer? >> clerk: there was an actual complaint from a member of the boards office who had some concerns about confusion that might have occurred when individuals wanted to walk through the doorway. there was some confusion. supervisor preston your office contacted us about their

concern. but other than that we did not have any complaints about today. >> so i'd just like to note for the record that while we're in the middle of covid-19 that it seems to me that downstairs people are having trouble getting into the building. so that is noted for the record. as it relates to the items before us, madam deputy city attorney through the president, if you could tell us what our powers and our authorities are. we have heard earlier today that we have seven days to do something, what happens if we don't do that in seven days. and can you explain under an emergency order pursuant to every subsequent declaration that is issued by the chief executive, what the function of this body is?

>> the function of this body is to ratify both the initial declaration of emergency, which this board has done. but also to ratify any orders made pursuant to that declaration. so so far the mayor has made -- it was two earlier today, i believe that it's now three, and they're brought to you today through this resolution for your ratification. you do not have to ratify them, in which case they would not be effective. >> and what's the seven-day timeframe? >> the mayor declared the emergency and may issue orders pursuant to the emergency and they may last for seven days until the board takes action. so you will need to ratify within the seven days. >> so if the board fails to act, what happens? >> if the board fails to act i believe that the declaration and the orders would no longer be valid. >> i believe -- or is that cited in code? >> i believe and i can double

check. >> okay. so we all definitely voted unanimously on the declaration of emergency. so as the supplemental proclamations that are before us, i believe that there's one that is timestamped 11 march, 2020, at 1:50 p.m.. >> i don't know the time but it was on the 11th. >> can you as our attorney and counsellor in front of the 11 members of this board and the public explain what that declaration -- what that supplemental proc proclamation ? >> it is sum vised in the resolution -- summarized in the resolution. but the one that was issued on the 11th would order the controller to develop a policy to allow the city to continue to provide funding under existing agreements to non-profit organizations who may be unable to perform all of the duties under those contracts. it would suspend deadlines set

by local law requiring city bodies to take action within a specified time if they do not comply with those deadlines. it complies with the board and it gives the board latitude if it cannot meet and comply with the timeframes that apply. and suspend the charter requiring members of the city policy bodies to attend meetings in person. that order by the mayor has been complemented by a similar order by the governor which is with various provisions of the brown act. to extend the deadline to pay licensees and defer quarterly tax payments for small businesses. >> the second supplemental proclamation? >> to impose a moratorium on, evictions for non-payment of rent on tenants impacted by covid-19 and suspend for 60 days the shut off of power service and the imposition of late penalties by the p.u.c. and would suspend the initiateiation of lien for delinquent water and sewer bills

during the emergency and the controller to accept and extend donations for the purposes of emergency meanedness and sustain the residents and the businesses. >> third supplement to the mayoral proclamation? >> that was signed today after i entered this room. so i have not read it in full and it's not captured here. >> so we're being asked right now to ratify or agree with a third supplemental mayoral proclamation that you cannot advise us on because you have not yet read it? >> this resolution does not propose that you're ratifying the third one. it would only ratify the first two. >> got it. and so relative to the third one, which i have concerns with on page 4 at item 5, which i previously expressed, explain to

us what our powers and authorities are relative to the seven days. if we fail to act, if we act, when do we lose power on the third supplemental declaration? >> you have seven days in which to ratify it and during that time you could choose to decide that you will not ratify it and pass and say that you do not ratify the particular acts that are expressed in this one. as i said, i will confirm what the impacts of taking "no" action within seven days. >> right. here's the problem -- the problem is that it's entirely possible that this policy body that is department number one that is the only standing department in this town since the 1800s stops meeting. we may meet virtually, the governors waive the brown act, but what i need to understand

before this board leaves or if we need to change the concurrence motion to ratify or reject the third supplemental declaration. i need to understand that if this board fails to act in seven days, does it continue or does it cease? >> i'm going to have to get back tooto you on that. if you would like to wait i'll look it up now. >> yeah, we can just sit here until you do that. because i'm fine with the first two. i read those. the third one you have not read -- we have not read -- and if it goes into -- if it becomes effective and we cannot reject it, if we fail to meet in seven days, and we're in an emergency situation and our job is to be a check and balance to the executive branch, i need to

understand, we need to understand, our powers and authorities. >> i will look. i will also say that i'm aware that the clerk is making arrangements for this body to be able to meet remotely so that -- >> i understand that. i will be at the e.o.c. at 09:00 hours but i need to understand what our powers and authorities are and if we cannot reject it after seven days, we need to talk about that before we adjourn. >> okay. fair enough. while she's doing that why don't we just vote on the item itself which is inclusive to the supplements that were laid out already. let's see, do i need a motion for that? >> yeah, you do, you do. >> but this third supplement -- (indiscernible) supervisor

peskin, supervisor peskin? >> yes, sir? i would be happy to make a motion to concower in the actions to meet the local emergency as set forth in the motion on the imperative calendar that only deals with the two aforementioned first and second supplements to the mayor's proclamation declaring the existence of local emergency. i would like to subsequently, depending on the advice from counsel, to move or not move the third supplement to the mayoral proclamation. so i am making a motion to concur in the actions to meet local emergency relative to the motion that is before us on our desks as to the first and second supplements to the mayor's proclamation. >> is there a second? supervisor fewer. and, madam clerk, if we vote on

this right now and approve it, do we have -- i guess some leverage still to discuss the third supplement which is not on this agenda? >> clerk: given that supervisor peskin made it very clear, that you would dispose of this item and then the body could at another time or in this conversation talk about that. >> i withdraw my motion pending counsel. >> you can keep the motion, it's just that we won't vote on it. >> all right. >> okay. so, first and second it and we'll just wait a few minutes. >> hold on a second. mr. president, are all 11 members in receipt of the first, second and third supplement to the mayor's pr proclamation?

>> (indiscernible). >> so are all members in receipt of the motion concurring with the actions of the mayor? those actions are set forth in two separate documents. are those actions before us, do you guys even know what we're voting on? >> we have a two-page motion concurring. we don't have the two documents that are referenced. >> all right, at least i don't. so the first one is a supplement and dated 11 march at 1:53 p.m.. and the second one is dated march 13th at 4:47 p.m. and that -- they are both set forth here. but if you don't have them,

madam clerk, everyone should have them before we vote on them. >> clerk: through the president, as far as the clerk's office is concerned we have sent those items to each of the members. i don't believe that they were submitted today with the third supplement. the third supplement and the deputy city attorney can correct me if i'm wrong, the third supplement is not before you today to approve. >> we understand that, that is dated 17 march at 2:51 p.m.. >> clerk: so through the president i'd provide you the dates and times in your emails that we have submitted all three to you. >> we're all electronically in receipt and i just wanted to make sure that as this body is going to on a week-by-week basis, in person or virtually, ratify thos these things that wl know what we're voting on. this is profoundly important.

and, by the way, i have reviewed both of the first two and i'm 100% okay with them. the third one i have got questions about and i would like to understand if we do not happen to meet next tuesday, did we waive our authority or did we not waive our authority? and that is the advice that i am looking for from our attorney at this time. >> yes. i got that part. also if the answer is that we waive our authority because the last day that we could actually vote on it right now is monday of next week because that would be the seventh day and next tuesday would be the eighth day. so that's i think is -- and supervisor peskin is absolutely right to question that. if we were to lose that authority, my recommendation is

that we could -- for this one item -- also to have a special meeting on it and hopefully the virtual or the online, whatever it is called, we could be away from the chamber, would be up and running. so that we have that option too.

>> hello, mine is not turned on. >> mr. president, supervisor aaron peskin is rising to make a motion to recess the board meeting pending legal counsel's answer to our last question. >> second? second. seconded by supervisor mandelman. >> can i ask a question. could we -- could i make a friendly amendment to your motion and say that we -- we leave it to our president to decide whether or not we need a special meeting on monday or -- or if we're unable to vote down

the order number three? >> yeah, that's what i suggested earlier that if we don't get a clear answer then we could always do that. and we don't need a motion. excuse me. can you get to the mike, i can't hear you. there's a motion on the floor to vote on the first and second supplement and there wasn't any questions about that, except supervisor peskin asked if we read it -- >> point of order. actually there is a motion to go into recess. so i think we need to address that motion first. >> oh, okay, i was getting there. >> can i make a friendly amendment to the motion before we vote on it? >> i think if the body wants to vote on a motion to recess they could. if the president wanted you to

state your friendly amendment, the first and second would have to agree to it. >> i see. do you agree to it? >> so we could come back in five minutes and whatever. >> so, colleagues, in the age of love and covid-19, not getting basic answers to the most important legal questions about the authority of department number one, the legislative branch, are things that we have to have in real-time that we should have actually been advised of days ago. i am happy to step out of these chambers and to ask our deputy city attorney if she cannot resolve this question, which i would imagine that is set forth in a very basic citation, then we can continue this. if that is not the case, i would

accept the friendly amendment. but if we can -- we don't have to recess, but, mr. president, if the sergeant-at-arms can go consult with the city attorney as to whether or not this is going to be answered in the next five minutes or the next five hours, then i would accept or not accept the friendly amendment from my good colleague from district 9. >> we are in session and i will leave it for now until we get an answer. we're in session and we're just not saying anything. so if you would like to turn off your microphone currently that would be good. >> mr. president, i would respectfully suggest that we vote on the motion made and seconded to recess until we -- 10 minutes.

i stick with my motion to call the question. >> call the question to recess. supervisor walton? >> (indiscernible). >> i know that you seconded it already. okay, roll call. >> clerk: 10-minute recess, mr. president. >> yes, or shorter. >> clerk: supervisor mandelman, and supervisor mar. mar aye. and supervisor peskin. peskin aye. supervisor preston, preston aye. and supervisor ronen, ronen aye. and supervisor safai, safai a, and supervisor walton, walton aye. and supervisor yee, yee aye. and supervisor fewer? fewer aye.

>> okay, welcome back from recess. so what we have on the floor right now is -- i believe that it's still valid -- the motion, seconded to -- to accept the -- >> the findings -- >> we voted on that already. just the item itself. >> and now the item is just before the board, mr. president. >> supervisor peskin. >> thank you, mr. president. it is my understanding that as to the motion that is before us on the imperative calendar, concurring with the actions taken by 11 march and 13 march that there were typographical errors and i believe that the copy before us fixed those errors, is that true or not tr

true? >> the president's office indicated that it is true that the typos have been corrected. >> okay. so in the dearth of legal advice to this body and the legislative branch, i'm happy to vote on the affirmative on the motion that is before us on the imperative calendar and, mr. president, i hereby respectfully request that an absence of legal advice that we schedule either in-person or virtually a special meeting of the board of supervisors on monday, to deal with the third supplement to the mayor's proclamation. >> so there was a request and i will honor that to schedule that for monday. >> thank you, sir. >> so we have a motion on the floor. so roll call please. >> clerk: supervisor mandelman. mandelman aye.

supervisor mar, mar aye. supervisor peskin. peskin aye. and supervisor preston. preston aye. and supervisor ronen. ronen aye. and supervisor safai, safai aye. and supervisor stefani, aye. and supervisor walton, walton aye. and supervisor yee, yee aye. and supervisor fewer, fewer aye. supervisor haney, haney absent. there are 10 ayes. >> so the motion carries. deputy -- deputy city attorney pearson, did you have an answer? because we're wondering what action to take with the third item. >> so i apologize for the delay. this is not an issue that our office was advised on before. under state law when the mayor declares an emergency the board must -- may last for seven days until the board ratifies it or chooses not to. that's with respect to the

declaration of emergency. under the charter, the board is also expected to ratify any orders that are taken or made pursuant to that declaration. the charter does not include a specific deadline or timeframe for that action the way that state law imposes on the act of ratifying the declaration of emergency. so what's being brought to you now are -- is a request to ratify the orders under the charter and the board must ratify them but as i said that there's no specific deadline. so they must be brought to you as quickly as possible. when they are brought to you may choose to ratify them or not. if you don't -- if you don't take action and don't meet for the next 10 days they'll remain in effect until you do. you will have not lost your opportunity to take action. and to vote to not ratify them if that's your choice. >> the first statement that you

made, that you talked about -- in which it sounded like we were to take no action that the action would be in effect for seven days, and if after that that we don't take any action that the action would disappear? that's according to state law? >> there are two things that this board is asked to ratify. one is the initial declaration of emergency made now, a couple weeks ago. and under state law the board is required to ratify that within seven days. and had the board not taken action within seven days there would not have been an ongoing declaration of emergency, but the board did ratify that. >> so these supplements should be ratified but there's no time limit? >> right. the supplements are not a new declaration of emergency. these supplements are orders of actions taken under the

emergency authority. and those are required under the charter to be ratified by this board but as i mentioned they are not subject to the strict seven-day timeframe that is the declaration of morning is emergd be subject to. if you don't act as i said for 10 days, they will remain in effect until you do. >> and our action could be to ratify or not to ratify? >> or to alter. >> or to alter. supervisor peskin, did you still have a question? >> thank you, mr. president. through the president to our legal counsel, can you please advise this body as to the original declaration which explicitly stated that this board could -- not that any of us would or want to -- cancel that declaration of emergency. how would that technically work? >> i would assume that you would

do that by motion. >> so, in other words, relative to timeframes on a given tuesday, a member could introduce a motion to cancel and on the subsequent tuesday's calendar the board could vote by a majority to cancel? >> under the charter normal notice posting of agenda requirements under the board of supervisors are not applicable to the board's actions pursuant to the ratification of the declaration of emergency and the orders issued thereto. so there may be -- so there might -- >> i'm not talking about ratifying but talking about canceling. >> you would do that by motion. are you asking how long -- what type of notice that you would need to give of your motion? >> yes, ma'am.

i mean, in an emergency situation could we do that in 24 hours, 7 72 hours? >> an emergency to declare that there's no longer an emergency? >> correct, because, listen -- this is not going to happen -- what i'm looking for is advice to this body which is a check and balance to the executive branch of government as to what our authorities and powers are. so what i'm trying to determine is -- and i do not believe that the mayor of the city and county of san francisco would ever abuse her authorities or her powers, but if we believe that to be true, do we need 24 hour notice, 72-hour notice, one-week notice, how does it work? >> supervisor peskin, i suggest that she do the research and get it to us by the 24 hours with

the answer because right now -- i get a sense that you need to have some time to look more carefully. >> i will totally defer to you, mr. president, relative to supplemental orders that do not appear to be covered by state law but appear to be covered by charter law, i would like to reiterate the advice that i think that you gave us. which is that we can act at any time, failure to act does not in any way affect our future powers, is that true or not true, through the president? >> that is true. under the charter the mayor should be bringing these orders to you as quickly as reasonably possible so that you may act. either to concur, amend or not concur. and if you do not -- and in the period that you do not act, they will remain in effect and you will not waive your opportunity to act when you do meet to

consider them. >> okay, and then let me to underscore one word that you said. that is unbelievably important, and i want to make sure -- because you've said it twice, through the president, the word "amend" which is that this body can actually amend the chief executive's order. >> that's correct. >> thank you, ma'am. >> supervisor fewer? >> yes, deputy city attorney, so just for clarification, if when the time that we are not voting on that, if her mandate is in effect, is that correct? >> i'm sorry, could you repeat the question? >> so is it an order for her mandate to actually be in effect, the board must vote on it? or if we choose not to vote on

it, it will remain in effect until the moment that we do vote on it? >> it's the latter. it will remain in effect until you do. >> so that means that it is happening -- in other words, it is happening without our permission, is that correct? or without our -- >> it's happening pursuant to the original permission that we delegated unless we revoke an order or amend the order or ratify the order. >> so, quite frankly, just to vote on it is somewhat of a formality, because it is still in effect even if we vote on it or not, is that correct, mr. miskin, supervisor, through the supervisor. i mean, is that right? >> i have no idea. >> oh, is that right? >> there's two -- there are two orders that have been issued -- or three now and two that are the subject of this resolution. they are now in effect.

and they will be until this board takes action and you may choose to ratify them, or you may choose to not ratify them. but -- >> if you choose to not ratify them it means that they're still in effect though, is that correct? >> at the point that you choose to not ratify them, they'd no longer be in effect. >> okay. thank you. >> so in that case, mr. president, i would like to make a motion to rescind the vote on the imperative calendar as to the motion concurring with the actions taken on 11 march, and 13 march. >> and the reason for that is because rather we vote today on it to ratify that it's still in play? >> based on the advice that we have received, if we fail to act, it is in -- it is deemed to have been in essence a

concurrence until we act. >> okay, so there's a motion to rescind the vote. any objection? a second to that? can i have a second? supervisor ronen. any objection? i think that the house has changed. so we need to vote on it. >> yes, it has, right. on the motion to rescind, supervisor mandelman? mandelman aye. supervisor mar, mar aye. and supervisor peskin, aye. and preston aye. and supervisor reasonnen, aye. supervisor safaia, aye. and supervisor fewer, fewer aye. and supervisor haney, haney aye. there are 11 ayes. >> so is there a motion to continue this item to next week? >> i still had more questions for the city attorney.

>> supervisor ronen. >> thank you. so given that we can amend these orders, can we also add additional orders? >> given the importance of these questions, of this emergency and these answers, i would prefer to have the time overnight to look into all of the questions that you have. there have been very few emergencies declared in the past and i'm aware of prior emergencies that orders have been made that the board did not agree with and were overturned by the board. but i would much prefer to not give you quick answers in such -- >> that's totally fair. i think that is a great plan and i am glad that we just rescinded the vote then that we just took. that sounds great. if you could give us the answer to that question, that would be great. and one other question for you to research is, if we add a new order that the mayor doesn't

agree with, does she have the power to veto it? that's another question that you'll look into? thank you. >> supervisor preston. >> thank you. and along similar lines, just understanding better the process if we were to amend one of these supplemental -- what that process would be. and whether the ball then goes back to the mayor or that becomes the final order. and i want to say that i appreciate supervisor peskin teasing this out a bit and i think just to observe that we have a number of things right now that are both the subject of mayoral supplemental orders and parallel legislation moving in this body. and so to the extent that we have the authority in this process to amend more

efficiently we can sort of merge those efforts for the board to weigh in. but i think that it's critically important that we understand what that process is moving forward. >> supervisor peskin. >> through the president to deputy city attorney pearson, i know that you have the hardest job with a new client that happens to be 11 people, and i appreciate your indulgence and, please, do not mistake any of what's going on tonight in the middle of an emergency as a reflection on anything. these are the fundamental questions of this board, of our democracy, and this emergency moment. so, please, do not mistake anything that i am asking or that we're asking in any way personal whatsoever and we're just living through some tough

times. and as elected officials we really have to understand the checks and the balances, so bless your heart. >> so, madam clerk, just handed a note to me to say that the mayor does not veto motions. so whatever that is. and so right now i'd like to have a motion to continue this item to the march 24th meeting. >> so moved. >> a second? >> okay, seconded by walton. and no objectionings. and the motion passes to continue the item to next week. and so deputy city attorney, so there's been several questions that were asked. and as i agree with you, rather than just at this point, that you can do research and if you could give us a written answer,

is 24 hours adequate? >> absolutely. >> tomorrow at midnight. all right. madam clerk, anything else. >> clerk: yes, mr. president. today's meetinga adjourned in memory of the following beloved individuals on behalf of supervisor peskin for the late mr. mel sharp. >> okay. so with nothing else then, the meeting is adjourned.

>> welcome, everyone. press mute if you come on to the phone. the first item on the agenda -- i don't want to be muted because the people need to speak. for those of you who are just joining you, this is the march 17th, 2020 commission meeting and we're doing this for the first time using microsoft. please excuse us if