disruptive. because of the low traffic volumes they've been able to take up a bit more space which is saving them a bit more time and they're getting back on track. similarly, central subway is looking like -- i know that they've made promises before but the central subway project is feeling very real right now in terms of a schedule of substantial completion date of the construction itself being done at the end of this calendar year. and that is then followed by a year of testing and opening up for revenue service at the end of 2021. and if you remember the substantial completion and the revenue service dates for van ness bus rapid transit? >> i have it in my notes. yeah, go ahead. >> i was going to say that i know that they are re-evaluating what the most recent dates were.

simply based on the long delays that the public has been observing with the work with public works. but we should have an update soon i would imagine. but, yeah, the timeframe i think that they're re-evaluating right now. >> there's been many of our smaller projects, however, that were not allowed to proceed during shelter-in-place and like neighborhood and traffic on main and the required work by actual work crews working together, they were deemed non-essential. >> okay, thank you. >> okay. commissioner safai. >> commissioner safai: thank you, chair peskin and thank you mr. tumlin. so i understand the fiscal

outlook. can you talk a little bit more about what some of your adjustments would be if and when and hopefully the cares act passes and there's additional moneys that come down to the transportation agencies, because i know that you have to present the situation based on the funding scenarios that we have. but i also know that the state and the federal government are going to do everything they can to support. as you know we have been in strong conversations with the representative bodies. one of the things that is very important to them are some of the workplace injury prevention programs. the other things that we worked on are the social distancing and rear boarding and ensuring the safety of the operators. so ensuring that we're balancing the protection and the conditions of the workforce, along with ensuring that we're increasing ridership -- excuse me -- and service is really important. in our part of town, you know,

we brought the 43 back online, thank you for working withous that. that was really important. we ensured that it's not isolated. it was in the beginning. so we really appreciate that. but we also want to ensure that you're thinking about how you're going to make those adjustments when and if that money comes down and what kind of commitments you're willing to make with regard to that. the other thing too is that now that the traffic common work is back on track, i mean, we have our second round of money that we want to move as aggressively as we can to get our speed humps and our traffic calming in place. this is something that we overwhelmingly hear from our residents because a lot of our streets are connector points to freeways. so people avoid mission and geneva and other places on ocean avenue to cut through the neighborhoods. and so -- and it's amazing to me how fast you'll see the cars fly

down the residential streets. so we want to ensure that you're working aggressively with public works and other agencies to get those traffic calming measures put in place. so i know that is a couple different things but if you could respond to those i would appreciate it. >> so the funding from the federal stimulus package has been distributed to the regions. we got our first just recently and we'll be getting the second and last next month. that federal stimulus money allows us to close out this fiscal year which ends in june without layoffs. and the second is getting us into the first quarter of the next fiscal year. and so what that money does is it allows us to shrink significantly through attrition rather than layoffs. taking advantage of the fact that we have an aging workforce

and we're looking at a lot of retirements in the agency. but it requires that we cut basically all non-essential overtime, most of our contracting out, other non-essential services in order to be able to make it through the next fiscal year without layoffs. our budget situation for the 2020-2021 fiscal year is really, really bad. we're in better shape than many transit agencies, some of which are looking at simply shutting all services down. but in order to survive and protect our workforce we've got to cut everything and to shrink taking advantage of retirements. for other services like traffic calming, we're eager to get moving on those projects. public works crews are starting

to become available but all of us are a little limited right now because of the mad scramble for this period of time of adjusting to all of the emergency stuff that is needed as a result of covid. we expect that, you know, once we make it to august that at the end of the summer that things will stabilize and we'll get back to something closer to a precovid normal but, of course, things will never be like they were in january in san francisco. >> and then my last question is in terms of -- in terms of the -- enforcement and things like ticket asking street cleaning, we get a lot of questions about that and i know that the enforcement is starting to ramp back up as cleaning is happening but can you talk about that so we're all on same page? >> yes, right. so we started sending out warnings for street sweeping

enforcement back on june 13. we're starting actual ticketing this week. so please do move your cars because the streets are getting filthy. and we're now looking at figuring out exactly when we start enforcing parking meters. now that the businesses are open and most neighborhood commercial districts, parking has gotten very scarce. and we need to make sure that we keep availability for customers because of the drive to the commercial districts. so we'll be starting that parking meter enforcement in the coming weeks, likely in early july, there will be warning issued tickets. and we've got some remaining work to do but we're expecting to start enforcing muni service again the next round of service improvements including the re-start of rail which we're targeting in the second week in august, assuming that the opening up of the economy

precedes the (indiscernible) that we don't backtrack. >> okay, great, thank you. thank you, mr. chair. >> chair peskin: thank you. seeing no other commissioners on the roster, why don't we open this up to public comment. madam clerk. >> actually -- well, there's only a few additional slides if you would like to indulge us with more time on the agenda -- >> this is important. go ahead. >> okay. so bringing it back to dan. >> thank you. there's only about five or six more slides so we'll be done shortly. again, to highlight our neighborhood commercial corridor and all of the efforts that we are doing to kind of support them because the economic recovery is centered on those

districts right now and there's no recovery without transportation support. one of the big programs that we have is the curbside pickup and we saying yes to pretty much every request unless we can find a major conflict. and this curbside pickup and queuing space has been ongoing since the beginning of the crisis and today we have approved 450 temporary loading zones supporting businesses. this work is all done by the emergency authority so we just simply put out the temporary signs like the ones that you have there after the request has been approved. and i want to talk about the new initiative, the shared spaces program, led by the mayor's office and the economic economy task force with working with rec, park and planning, so truly a city-wide effort.

and the shared spaces program repurposes the public space including space on the sidewalks. city-owned land and streets for the use of local businesses so they can reopen while observing the spacing they need from the health department. so it could be tables and chairs and shelves and racks to support retail. and the street space that we're looking at is under the m.c.a.'s jurisdiction is spaces only in the parking lane like park lift or full or partial street closures. so this program has been tremendously popular and we have been overwhelmed with applications. we had almost 350 applications to date for curbside dining and over 40 street closure applications that we are working through. we had staff working over the weekend, and we brought extra staff in so it's really been an all hands on deck effort by m.c.a. to support this and we have approved about 200 applications so far and p.b.w. has approved many, many more sidewalk only applications that

don't have to do with streets. so we're trying to say yes as much as possible consistent with the other program, but we're vetting these proposals for consistency with traffic safety. and we're also making sure that it doesn't conflict with the key transportation needs like the muni route like we previously mentioned. but the goal is to support the business district while balancing the needs that the transportation system still has. and last component of this effort is parking meter enforcement that jeff already alluded to. so the only thing that i'll add to jeff's remarks is that we're looking to return meters back to the base rates. and that really goes to the muni community. and so fisherman's wharf won't work for sunset and won't work for the bayview. so we'll work with each community individually to determine what pricing and what enforcement policy works best for their district. but in general from our perspective, a successful

metering policy is one that ensures at least one or two spaces in each corridor are available for people to park. and the last element of the recovery plan is to immediately address conse congestion and mae travel as people return to the daily commute. which as jeff mentioned that we think that will take shape in august or september. as you have previously stated right now muni is not able to carry the same number of people as it once did, primarily with the health restrictions and also the budget issues. while the ffca's data is shows that congestion is already returning so we have a scale on that. and we would support working on your congestion pricing study and working with the city on strategies to reduce the overall demand for travel by encouraging tele-commuting. the message that we want to send is flatten the peak. so we have already flattened the curve and we want to flatten the

peak for travel. and working with our business community, what that means is encouraging employers to stagger their work shifts, to leave earlier and later so everyone is not on the roads at 8:00 a.m. or 5:00 p.m.. and as the offices come back they could have workers to alternate schedules so people aren't coming in five days a week and coming in every tuesday or thursday or something like that. again, to reduce the load -- on not only our transportation system but the offices in general and their elevators. so now i'd like to pass it back to director tum listen to wrap up and to summarize the presentation. >> all right, jeff, the floor is yours and thank you to all of your staff and thank you to my colleagues for all of their questions. go ahead. >> so we just presented an immense amount of material to you all. i hope that we've demonstrated in the last couple weeks that the government is capable of getting stuff done if we're clear about our values and we're willing to take risks. really, if we're willing to do some experimentation in the street and to be willing to fail. i want to express a lot of

gratitude to every single one of your offices for how forward you've been in your engagement with us and helping us to find new ways of directly engaging with your constituents in ways that are meaningful and ways that allow us to hear from new voices and also to allow us to work really, really quickly given the unique conditions of this crisis. but really our question for you and we're coming here openly for your advice, we know that there are some dire changes that are going to be upon us. we know that we've got constrained resources. how bold should we be in adapting san francisco's transportation system in order to meet the changing needs of our people, to be able to protect the health and safety of our workforce and to be able to look towards the future where we're less dependent upon carbon, and where we care more deeply about equity and where we use the mobility system, not only to help to support economic

recovery, but to make sure that recovery benefits the people who have the fewest choices. and we're eager to hear whatever you may have to say. >> chair peskin: thank you, director tumlin. and as i said earlier, i think on june 9th, i really hope that -- and i think that it really is the turning of a page between the legislative branch of the government, both through the board of supervisors and our incarination as the transportation authority and the sfmta and i welcome it. it is long overdue and it's a breath of fresh air. so on behalf of the county transportation authority, i want to thank you for engaging us in a meaningful and a real way as the elected folks here. and i know that commissioner yee has some final comments and we have a timma meeting and one more quick item on the calendar, but, commissioner yee, the floor is yours. >> commissioner yee: thank

you, i'll try to make this quick. and i'm glad that they're doing a lot of things. and things that were talked about today and, certainly, people can make sure that you bring the community along for them to actually embrace this. and i have one quick question. for the shared space, those alleyways are an expense for it to be shared. and my understanding is that in this particular alley that i'm thinking of, which is not in my district, that there's -- at the end of the alleyway there's probably like two garages that are at the end. and the business side is at the other end, it is restaurants and so forth. and so right now it's allowed because the traffic can't go through or something like that.

and it doesn't make any sense to me. because this alleyway seems to be wide enough to get in and out of there at one end of the street. so is that true? i mean, that one cannot have a shared space this that alleyway because of the two garages? >> dan, do you want to take that? >> so in the shared spaces program, one of the things that we're particularly focusing on with regard to the street closures is making sure that the street closure application is community supported. meaning that everyone on the street who is affected has had a chance to weigh in. and to that effect we have basically been partnering with the supervisor offices, so in that location if the supervisors office is able to support that -- the needs of the street, and we have seen that in district three, for example, and the other locations throughout the city, then they provide us

-- they ask for a site plan. (please stand by) we'll have our team working with the community of the supervisors office to find a solution that works. >> okay. and then i will talk to supervisor preston --

>> oh yeah. >> thank you. right over there by the apartment association. let's go to public comment. madam clerk, could you please go to public comment. >> clerk: welcome, caller, your two minutes begins now. >> good morning, chair peskin and commissioners. i'm a walk assess really appreciates all of the work that the sfmta is doing. keep moving safely, especially in the ways that show that you're really thinking big and moving quickly to respond to the community's needs. specifically thank you to the sfmta transportation recovery plan, for moving to immediately speed up the service due to the transit-only lanes and keep service levels high.

but also for achieving the city's public health goal. and in terms of making it safe to walk, we really appreciate the slow streets program, the feedback has been overall positive. and we encourage the commissioners to work with sfmta to find ways to engage with communities who want to see slow streets made more permanent and to be sure that the program is equitable in its distributions and work communities who want them. don'if we're predicting more can san francisco, because more people are going to be fearful of riding muni and we're encouraging more people to walk, to and from the set-up buses, we need to be focused on safety improvements on the high-injury network. these are, you know, super dangerous streets. often home to some of our busiest muni lines.

we know we have low-cost like daylighting, left-turn calming that can be used to make them safe immediately. this is, you know, really important work and we know it can't slow down, especially when we've seen three vision zero traffic deaths this month alone. we can't go back to 30 traffic deaths a year and 600 traffic injuries. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> operator: you have nine questions remaining. >> clerk: hello, caller, your two minutes begins now. >> thank you, chair peskin. lots of good things. muni is one of the tools that i have in my toolbox. i am concerned about bus stops. we have to really make sure that does not happen, especially when you look at people with disabilities. i maintain to you that reduced fare must never mean reduced

service. i'm also a user of the shared bikes and scooters. they both play an important part. i certainly want to see the wheels expand citywide. and all-electric fleet. and the scooters also play a part. i think all of these vehicles should be powered, because powered vehicles can help people with disabilities, especially people with things like arthritis, that make it hard to pedal conventional bicycles. we need to have that out there. and the vast majority of people who use shared bikes and scooters are responsible. i am held strict accountability with the companies i have accounts with, and not just because i can be sanctioned in the platform. i mentioned to you that even though i am very much a user of transit and shared mobility, that i do have a driver's license. it is a license from nevada. but last time i checked, it is valid in san francisco. and i have owned a car in the past. while i have never driven in san

francisco, i have driven a car in new york city. it's very, very congested. and i developed a good relationship with new jersey transit for the last mile through the hudson, under the hudson, through the link tunnel, through the exclusive bus lane that's been operating since 1970. so i look forward to continuing the improvements. but i ask let us not forget those persons with disabilities. they need to ensure they're included. >> chair peskin: thank you. next speaker, please. >> operator: you have nine questions remaining. >> clerk: welcome, caller, your two minutes begins now. >> caller: this is a resident of district 7. i'm a member of the san francisco transit riders. and i fully -- i fully support, you know, using muni's expansion of the transit-only lanes, the

bike lane extensions. i'm a fan of all of it. but i really, personally i have ridden the 28, you know, most of my life going up and down the west side. my family is merchants on the west side. i'm fully -- you know, we're all in really huge support and making sure that transit moves effectively through our city. it has a huge impact on both our customers and family members who take the bus to go to work. i take the bus to work. and especially in an era when people are scared, people are scared of taking the bus, we need to be there and muni needs to make sure that these people come back and continue to -- i think transit-only lanes are at a key part of making transit attractive and lowering our carbon emissions. thanks.

>> operator: you have nine questions remaining. >> clerk: welcome, caller, your two minutes begins now. >> caller: good morning, chair peskin, commissioners. this is zach. i want to reiterate our support for expanding transit-only lanes to expand across the city. slow streets, street closures -- [indiscernible] have proved enormously popular. they gained that popularity because people were able to experience them. people riding muni deserve that same opportunity to experience the success of these pilot projects. experience faster, more reliable, more efficient service. so we can feel the benefits of those projects at the same time, that we do this needed, deeper community outreach and engagement. we know muni ridership has remained relatively high on certain corridors, serving those most dependent on transit and essential workers.

we need to support these people with efficient, public transit. it doesn't get stuck in returning car traffic. [indiscernible] riders are safer and make sure that efficient use of muni vehicles and actually complete the trip as a result. quicker trips means more jobs and services. if muni is stuck in traffic, it's inefficient to use, more expensive to operate and more punitive for those who don't have other options. this will disproportionately affect people with lower incomes, disabilities and communities of color. instead we urge you to reinvest in muni, into transit priorities across the cities. so we urge your strong support for robust projects and look forward to working with the sfmta and each supervisor to support robust outreach and feedback across districts in san francisco. thank you.

>> operator: you have ten questions remai remain. >> clerk: welcome, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: hi. i'm a muni rider and bike rider. as well as the permanent extension of the slow streets network, sfmta needs to be far more -- certain we need to make sure that biking infrastructure are both treated as first-class mobility. historically hasn't been true. recorded temperatures at 100 degrees fahrenheit for the first time ever, something that is incredibly alarming. we need to season to remove cars from the streets.

that are artificially subsidized by capitalists and low gas prices. it will be increasing inefficient to use, expensive to operate and more punitive for those without orations. we have to make changes now in transit and san francisco as a whole is going to survive and thrive after covid. even the initial proposed transit lanes are not merely enough. i'd also like to support transit-only lanes permanent. before the covid cries is, we've seen how buses and trains were constantly delayed by traffic and how pedestrians and bikes don't have enough space. and transit-only and slow streets should be a permanent change to the streets. finally, i support supervisor peskin's comments about the transit-only lanes to transportation-only. we shouldn't be prioritizing obvious, lyft and others when they get too many from capitalists to shove the solutions down our throats. transit-only lanes should be

public transit infrastructure only. thank you. >> operator: you have ten questions remaining. >> clerk: welcome, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: good afternoon, commissioners. my name is john. i'm in district 7. i'm the chair of the balboa reservoir citizens' advisory committee. and wanted to speak out in shared spaces. up until the crisis, has been going up in the middle of a big renaissance with new street traffic and foot traffic on the streets. so they need to be saved, seating spaces on the side. sidewalks and maybe even on the streets. also i want to speak out in favor of transit-only lanes. i'd like to see a quick build of transit-only lanes on ocean avenue, geneva avenue and freida avenue. that's so that people can get to

city college by bus and need to get into the habit of doing that, rather than driving. because a thousand of the parking spots are going away for the balboa reservoir housing project. so also i'd like you to think about keeping, as previous caller said, these are crisis measure. i think if they worked out well, we could look at making it work for the future. making them permanent. as the neighborhood densifies and as more people start going to city college, and as the neighborhood commercial corridor and merchant avenue improves, i think we really need to think about transit-only lanes, as well as transit-activated signaling on ocean avenue. also i want to make sure that you've all seen our resolution from the balboa reservoir c.a.c. asking for full funding and implementation of the ocean avenue redesign. thank you very much.

>> operator: you have nine questions remaining. >> clerk: hello, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: hello. my name is milo. i'm a member of the transit rider union. er and community action. i just want to voice my support for the recovery plan, that sfmta has put forward, putting up every point i think is a good idea. and i trust the leadership. specifically the bike lane, kind of quick-build bus lines sing a good idea and the city would benefit. i urge you guys to support that. the safe street to keep them permanent. sanchez that i use all the time, also write live. and e-bike expansions i think is

also a great idea, that could go hand-in-hand with -- [indiscernible] i know other commenter also voiced support for the same, good way to get around the city. it's acceptable. yeah, thank for your time and consideration. >> operator: you have nine questions remaining. >> clerk: hello, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: good afternoon. my name is christopher peterson. i'm a resident of district 7 and also a member of s.f. transit riders. i strongly support muni's proposal to -- transit-only lanes. my only a regret it doesn't go far enough. i ask board members to -- too often it seems board members act

as agents of the status quo, pressing muni to do more studies and embark on more process, watered-down proposals to apiece outspoken constituents. the net effect is it takes forever to implement, if they ever happen at all. this board should instead act as agents of progressive change, pressing muni to think as creatively and act as urgently as possible to improve. that means not only transit-only lanes, but also relatively cheap, easy-to-implement changes such as turn restrictions, transit signal priorities, preemption and bus stop locations. i'd also like to second earlier comments about improvements to ocean avenue. if any of these specific changes don't work, they can easily be reversed or modified. but remember the people who suffer the most from poor transit are the lower-income populations and communities of

color, who depend on muni most of all. thank you. >> operator: you have eight questions remaining. >> clerk: hello, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: good afternoon. this is peter straes. i'm on the board of the san francisco transit rider. you heard from zach and i think i can be brief. but i want to commend sfmta and jack and his staff for their proposals to apply quick-build to transit lanes and to move boldly in advancing that program. i understand the need for conservative start. but i want to in particular urge you to take another look at what can be done to benefit the p3rd line, which has suffered from the need of fixes since it opened 13 years ago, in particular to take a look at quick implementation of am quick-build approach to help the

33rd get through the shared lanes and the bayview and the critical few lanes from the bridge to the south. thank you. >> operator: you have seven questions remaining. >> clerk: well, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> yeah, hi there. my name is michelle. i am a verno heights district 9 resident, as well as a member of the san francisco transit rider and san francisco bike coalition. i ride my bike and i take muni inside the city. i just want to issue -- to second that last call for improvements to the p3rd line. i ride the p to work. and especially there is just a

ton of congestion near the caltrain. there can be 20, 30 people if not more on a crowded train and waiting for a driver in a car to make a left turn. in other other topics, i would like to support pretty much everything in the transit recovery plan. so the slow streets, you know, maybe some of them aren't being used that much, if we take any of those away, then we should replace them with other places where there would be high usage, especially not many of those in the marina. there's i guess a few in the north beach and montpelier area. but more space in the slow streets area and the tenderloin area seem like a good idea. i urge the slow streets program to become policeman, as well as the transit-only lanes. i take the 14r frequently, learning in verno heights.

while the 14 does have bus priority lanes in some of its run, certainly the expansion on mission street, close to soma. so i urge the expansion of these bus-only lanes. and i urge them to be made public, same thing with the slow streets and the bicycle rider space that's clean and safe for car. that is a great thing. last thing there's a proposal to expand the bike-share system. that is definitely a great idea. i urge strong -- we saw that -- >> clerk: thank you, caller. >> operator: you have six questions remaining. >> caller: good afternoon. my name is dan. i'm a muni rider, district 5 resident and member of san

francisco transisanfrancisco ri. if my neighbors do not feel comfortable taking muni, they will drive, as mentioned in the presentation earlier. driving is not sufficient. an increase in driving will i think bring san francisco steeds to a standstill. if we can make it more frequent and maintain social distancing. this will keep people from driving. i do not own a car. i rely on public transit and biking to meet my mobility needs. multiple members of my family have previous conditions that make them high risk for severe illness if they contract covid-19. as we reopen, my mobility will be limited. if muni does not run buses frequently enough to avoid crowding. i'm hoping that san francisco can live up to our transit-first values and prioritize creating bus-only lanes throughout the city, that is more than currently being proposed. additionally, i hope our

transit-first city will keep the vast majority of these lanes in place after the threat of covid-19 has receded. thank you very much. >> operator: you have five questions remaining. >> clerk: welcome, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: hi, name. i'm a muni rider, bike rider and a member of the san francisco transit riders. i'm calling for support the massive extension of muni network and particularly the protected bike lane that's part of -- [indiscernible] that's how things are going to proceed. we need a transit system that provides mobility with increasing car traffic, fundamental geometry problem that will not be solved unless we increase bus frequency and rider safety.

lanes all across the city and a fully connected system of bikes lanes. these are civic things -- [indiscernible] i have tried to use buses for commuting frequently. it's not safe. i would also like to emphasize incredible importance of slow streets for the health of our neighborhoods. it's been a lifeline with two kids 6 and 7 years. we have discovered the joys of riding bikes without cars killing them. [indiscernible] i would love to see this expanded. recently took a trip from 22nd and pierce to harrison and 17th to go to the grocery store with my kids. it was death defying in valencia. so many cars blocked the streets. and you have to weave in and out of traffic with little kids. that is a recipe for disaster. thank you.

>> operator: you have four questions remaining. >> clerk: hello, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: my name is elias. i'm a muni rider, i live in district 5. a member of the san francisco transit riders. and i'm a member of the san francisco bicycle coalition. i'm calling to incolonel you all to support the dramatic expansion of muni network of transit-only lanes, as part of your transit recovery plan. this will allow you to increase bus frequency and avoid crowding and congestion as we recover from covid. i used to live in cathedral hill and take the number 19 bus to potrero hill for work. it was agonizingly slow.

i think your quick-build transit lanes on 7th street and 8th street would help to speed up the 19 bus. i'd like to see that happen, even if it's not of any use to me personally any more. i'd also like to see some of your slow streetses be made permanent. and i'm wondering what's happening with your plans to turn scott into a slow street and why that was reversed. i'd like to see that happen, too. i guess that's all i have to say. thank you. >> chair peskin: thank you. next speaker, please. >> operator: you have three questions remaining. >> clerk: welcome, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: good afternoon. my name is amy. i'm on the balboa reservoir community advisory committee.

this is very exciting start on recovery and reimagining transit. i would like to suggest that a transit-only lane be considered for preed way, adjacent to the balboa reservoir project. and also along ocean for the 43, masonic and other lanes that lead into balboa park. with the upcoming projects, traffic will be intense with 3,000, 4,000 residents coming to that area. and the project is planned as a transit-oriented development. right now even before it's built, during the rush hour and when city college is in session, it's very congested. and the route to bart is slow and unreliable is you're on the bus. the 43 masonic is an important cross-town route and this section is a bottleneck.

it's -- there's enough roadway on freida to redesign, to put in the red lane, to redesign the currently very scary bike lanes that goes along there. and so i suggest that this also be considered. we haven't got any plans, transit-only lanes south of bosworth. and balboa park bart is a side of the downtown area, one of the very busiest stations. and we're going to have a lot more development down here with the balboa upper yard, balboa reservoir, # 5 ocean and all the other, you know, density, high density developments that are around balboa park. so thank you for your consideration. >> operator: you have two questions remaining. >> clerk: hello, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: hi, members of the board, my name is shaweven had

and i live in district 7 in ingleside. i'm calling to ask you to support the expansion of transit-only lanes. i ride muni and i'm calling on behalf of a family member who lost her job at a restaurant. this is not all uncommon today. you can't bring back the restaurants that have closed. and this board can't bring back normal. one thing you can do, essential workers need to leave the house to do their jobs, shorten the time on the bus. in saturday in the chronicle, things imply higher risk staying in fairly close contact with a whole lot of people you don't know, doing that indoors, doing that for long periods of time, end quote. this sounds like a description of an inside of a muni vehicle stuck in traffic. transit not inherently safe, but it can be made safe. rail and buses can be run

safely. transit is safer for short, passenger trips are spread across more vehicle trips. please speed up the buses, help those who can't work from home to spend less time onboard sharing air with each other and our transit operators. please ask the sfmta to continue to even bolder vision to support a shift of transit, cycling and urban streets. i also please approve the bus-only lanes as proposed to end the pandemic and ease our streets efficiently and make this an equitable city. thank you. >> operator: you have one question remaining. >> clerk: welcome, caller. your two minutes begins now. >> caller: hi, good afternoon. thank you, everyone, for all of your efforts in all of the work that you've done trying to keep san francisco moving during this pandemic. my name is olivia. i'm a district 1 resident. i'm also a physician. i want to say that the patients i'm seeing with covid are mostly essential workers, also people living in nursing homes.

they are mostly lower income people. these are vulnerable people, most of them do not drive or own cars. most of them are getting around on transit still during this time. so we owe it to them to build a system that's safe for them, which includes transit-only lanes, which are going to keep the buses moving quickly, reduce the amount of time that buses are stuck in traffic. i think that we owe it to these people that are getting sick, to keep them safe, because they're keeping us safe. and i'm also going to mention that this is a respiratory pandemic. we know the air pollution makes it worse. we also know that outdoor transmission of the virus is rare. i think that that leads us to the conclusion that we need to create more space for people and create space to encourage modes of transportation that are not polluting. great highways, slow streets are a wonderful start, all a wonderful start. we need to keep moving with that. we don't know how long this is going to go on. we need to start adapting our situation to a situation where

we can be outside, where we can be safe and have a transportation system that is not going to make our respiratory systems worse. thank you. >> chair peskin: seeing no other members of the public for public comment, public comment is closed. and thank you to all of the members who participated in this. and we look forward to continuing these conversations with the sfmta. thank you, director tumlin. thank you to my colleagues. given that we have -- if you could read it, so i can make a motion to -- or take a motion to continue item 13. item number

>> i'm told by legal you don't need to make a motion. you guys can just continue the item. >> chair peskin: excellent. there any public comment on this -- on continuing this item? >> clerk: there is no public comment. >> all right. public comment is closed. and without objection, we will continue to our next meeting. is there any introduction of new items? seeing none, is there any general public comment? >> clerk: no, chair. >> chair peskin: okay. we are adjourned. i guess we have to log back in as timma right? >> clerk: correct. i have an announcement. for timma. members of the staff, please do not leave the teams meeting, we will start timma board in a few minutes. please turn off cameras and microphones while we set up to timma board. the public phone line will remain open and people can hear

what is being said. i'll make an announcement when we get ready to begin the meeting. sfgov tv please indicate in the chat when you're ready to go live for timma. june 23rd. this is chair haney. angela tso is our clerk. can you please call the roll.

>> clerk: commissioner fewer? >> present. >> commissioner haney? >> present. >> clerk: commissioner mandelman. >> commissioner mandelman: present. >> clerk: commissioner mar? >> commissioner mar: present. >> clerk: commissioner peskin? >> commissioner peskin: present. >> clerk: commissioner preston? >> commissioner preston: present. >> clerk: commissioner ronen. >> commissioner ronen: present. >> clerk: commissioner safai. safai absent. commissioner stefani? >> present. >> commissioner walton. >> present. >> clerk: commissioner yee. >> we have quorum. safai present. we have quorum. >> great. madam clerk, will you please call the next item. >> oh, chair, may i make an announcement about public comment. >> yes.

>> clerk: thank you. public comment will be available for each item on this agenda via telephone by calling (888)204-5987 and when prompted entering access code 2858465 as seen on the screen. then follow the system prompts. once you join, you'll be able to listen to the meeting as a participant. when you wish to speak on an item, dial 10 t 10 to be added e queue to speak. when your two minutes are up, you'll move on to the next caller. calls will be taken in the order of which they are received. best practices are to speak slowly, clearly, and turn down the volume of any televisions or radios around you. please allow for audio visual delays and 30-second lag time during the course of the meeting. item 2, chair's report. this is an information item.

>> great. i'm going to defer my comments on chair's report in the interest of time. i will be entertaining a motion, numerous items to continue the majority of our business today with the exemption of items 6 and 7, that are critical to approve before the end of the fiscal year. i do look forward to discussions at a future meeting. the upcoming require requires important decisions to timma, including consideration of the toll policy follow future residents, the timeframe also calls to discuss the funding tolling programs, critical afford county provisions. and with that i will conclude my remarks. operator, is there any public comment on the chair's report? >> chair, there is no comment. >> as a point of clarification,

this is legal counsel. there's no motion required, if you are going to continue. and i understand there are multiple items that you want to continue at this time. camera. >> commissioner haney: yes. we do want to continue all items, with the exception of items 6 and 7. >> so -- is there any public comments on that continuance of the matters 2, 3, 4, 5 and 8. >> there is no public comment. >> commissioner haney: great. so i believe, madam clerk, will you please call the next item that wasn't continued. >> clerk: so 2, 3, 4 and 8 were continued, correct? >> and 5. >> clerk: and 5. okay. so 2, 3, 4, 5 and 8. that leaves 6 and 7.

so item 6 amend adopted fiscal year 2019/2020 budget to increase revenues. -- i'm sorry. let me repeat that. by $228,368. decrease expenditures by $787,279 and decrease other financing sources by $1,015,647. that is an action item. and item 7. adopt the proposed provisional three-month fiscal year 2020/2021 budget and work program. that is an action item. >> commissioner haney: great. there are no planned staff presentations on this item. however, as mentioned, this is a

critical item to approve before the end of the fiscal year. are there any questions or comments from colleagues on these items? seeing none, would any members of the public like to speak on item 6 or 7? >> chair, mr. is no there is no public comment. >> all right. >> can we have a motion and a second on item 6 and 7. >> so moved. >> second. >> commissione -- fewer. >> chair peskin: great. roll call vote, please. >> clerk: for both items 6 and 7. commissioner -- i'm sorry. let me see. approval of both items 6 and 7. commissioner fewer? >> commissioner fewer: aye.

>> clerk: commissioner haney? >> commissioner haney: aye. >> clerk: commissioner mandelman? >> commissioner mandelman: aye. >> clerk: commissioner mar? >> aye. >> clerk: commissioner peskin? >> commissioner peskin: aye. >> clerk: commissioner preston? >> commissioner preston: aye. >> clerk: commissioner ronen? >> commissioner ronen: aye. >> clerk: commissioner safai? >> commissioner safai: a.i. >> clerk: commissioner stefani? >> aye. >> clerk: commissioner walton? >> commissioner walton: aye. >> clerk: commissioner yee. >> commissioner yee: aye. >> clerk: both items 6 and 7 pass. do you want -- are you still there, chair haney? i think we lost him on the

audio. one moment, please. chair haney, are you back on audio? okay. >> this is chair haney. i'm sorry. i'm having internet issues here. >> clerk: no problem. >> commissioner haney: so we took the final vote on 6 and 7? >> clerk: correct. and both items passed. >> commissioner haney: great. i'm waiting for you to call the next item. >> clerk: sure. item number 9. introduction of new items. it's an information item. >> commissioner haney: great. colleagues, any new items that you would like to introduce?

right. are there any public that would like to speak on item 9? >> chair, there is no public comment. >> commissioner haney: great. that will close the -- this introduction of new items. madam clerk, will you please call the next item. >> clerk: item 10, public comment. hey great. operator, are there any members of the public that would like to speak? >> chair, there is no public comment. >> commissioner haney: all right. public comment is now closed. >> clerk: madam clerk, will you please call the next item. >> clerk: item 11, adjournment. >> chair peskin: great. thank you. this meeting is adjourned.

>> this is a special meeting of the small business commission held on monday, june 8th, 020. 2020. the meeting is call to order at 11:00 a.m. the small business commission thanks media services and sf go tv for televising the meeting which can be viewed on sf tv

two. the number is (888)273-3658 and the access code is 310-7452. when prompted dial 1-0 to be added to the speaker line and the auto prompt will say they're entering question and answer time. when you're called for public comment, mute the device you're listening to the meeting on. when it's your time to speak, you will be prompted to do so. you're limited to three minutes a speaker unless otherwise established and speakers are requested and not required to state their name. sf gov tv, please show the business slide. >> we will start with the small

business commission this is the business forum to voice your opinions that affect the economic vitality of small businesses in san francisco and this is the best place to get answers about doing business in san francisco about the local emergency. if you need assistance with small business matters, you can find us online or via telephone. as always, our services are free of charge. before item one is called, i would like to start with thanking media services and sf gov tv for coordinating this visual hearing and special thanks to michael for moderating the public comment line. please call item number one. >> item one -- (role call).

item two, continued discussion on small business, refer coverrery and rebuilding, presentation on the shared space's programme to help businesses transition into phase two b and navigating businesses into space 2b and phase 3, response to civil unrest, update on recovery task force recommendations and other activities related to small businesses during the state of emergency.

>> good, commissioners. can everyone hear and see me? >> wonderful, perfect, go ahead, ted. >> thanks so much for having me this morning and just to introduce myself, ted conrad with the workforce development and staffing workforce. i'm pleased to be able to give you a brief presentation on the shared space's program. i've spoken to commissioners about this in other contexts and i'm excited to present this program to the commission.

can everyone see the slide? this the duration of the covid-19 emergency. the goal of the program is to support neighborhoods and support businesses. and we mean that broadly. so we expect for there to be quite a bit of interest from restaurants and hospitality businesses and dining and just slated to be allowed on june 15th, but shared spaces is something we're hoping will be beneficial to a broader range of businesses. and so i think just as an overview, thes easiest way to

think about the program is to think about the space a business might want to take advantage of, the curbside lane or parking lane, just the lane of the street adjacent to the sidewalk and the full street, there's a possibility to close this street to traffic and open it to people in winds. business, as well as park's plazas and it's designed to allow a broad range of uses, so from curbside pick-up, which is something the mta is offering to outdoor dining when it's allowed and more space for business customers to cue and other activities. so we sort of set the table in terms of making space available in as flexible a way as possible and as long the business is able to adhere to our safety and accessibility rules, they're able to take advantage of that space in a flexible way as long as it's in compliance with the

public health order. just some general provisions that apply to the program. the permits will not have any associated fees and the city and the division of labor here, that the city will establish and application process that businesses can apply to. and then, in as many spaces as possible, the city will make the space available. the rest we put on to the business and a lot of the work in identifying locations, determining what will work for an individual business, sort of expect the business to take the lead on that and compliance with the rules and, you know, in most cases, you're not submitting a site plan to a subsidy departmencity departmentfor a d. and the reason for that, of course, is speed and needs to allow businesses to take advantage of this more quickly and, you know, the city would expect the business or merchant's association in some

cases to provide furniture and physical barriers. and the application will be up very soon in the next day or so and so i'm excited about that and permits, the permit term will run through the end of the calendar year unless it's extended by the city and i hate to be a downer. when i talk about this, i try to give this caveat that not all spaces will work for all businesses and, indeed, we're extremely a dense city, as everyone at this meeting knows. so we have narrow sidewalks in many cases and many businesses -- many retail businesses, you know, will simply not be aplowe allowed toe situation because it's too narrow or congested to allow them to set up on the situation and still maintain a still path.

i would hope for the businesses that are able to take advantage of the sidewalk and i think in many cases it will be, there are businesses that aren't able to take advantage of the curbside lane because there's a fire hydrant and full-street closures, there's a number of safety considerations, but the biggest thing, if there's a muni line that's running, most likely that street will not be able to be closed to traffic just because of the critical nature of public transportation and getting folks around. so the program is designed to be as flexible as possible and i hope that when we serve the different considerations, you know, commissioners will recognise that. but in terms of -- i want to set expectations clearly and i want businesses to be sort of fully aware of what may or may not be allowed before making plans and investment around this. and lastly, i think as you'll see, because a lot of this is

self-certified and hands off from the city than constituents might be used to seeing, collaboration with neighbors is just absolutely essential to making sure this is a successful and positive program. and so, for sidewalks, it's really simple. the applicant will fill out an online form -- well, they'll read a set of rules, describing the key requirements and so, like you see in the second point, maintaining a six-point path of travel, no obstruction of fire equipment or other kind of safety equipment. so once a business has read these rules and determined they're able to participate, they'll fill out an online form, upload some insurance documentation which we can get to later and begin using the sidewalk two business days later. there's no submitting a plan to public works, like with the

current tables and chairs, permit process and no notification, nothing like that. however, you know, we will be enforcing this and the rationale between the two-business day delay is to give public works to check and make sure that folks who simply have to chance of being able to try to do that. i've offered caution about certain situations not being appropriate for this. and i just wanted to share this diagram. this is from the table's and chair's permit. permit. this six-foot dimension that they outline, that is the six-foot-wide path of travel that needs to be maintained and

i think just an important thing to notice here that even though this is sort of -- to this six feet, this is a 12-foot wide sidewalk. many have a furniture zone, different obstacles like tree wells, parking meters, boxes, et cetera, and so even if you go to measure situation and it's 12 feet wide, it's very possible that it will be tough for you to set up tables and chairs in a safe way and we encourage folks to maintain accessibility to really sort of think about their lay-out will look like before proceeding with this. moving on to the next group of public spaces available, i'll mention the curbside lane known as the parking lane. and so generally speaking, if

it's just a parking use, metered or unmetered, business will generally use the parking lane in that case and will not be able to use it if it's a red zone, a blue zone for handicap parking, a bus stop if it's a curb ramp and if the street has high speed limits or another safety or operational conflict. now, i will note that mta, if, say, a business wanted to participate in this and they applied and turned out when mta looked, there was a fire hydrant and red zone in front of their business, mta will sort of look to find alternatives on the block, other locations on the block that might be appropriate. and so, it's not to say that a business will be totally prevented from participating, but those are the conflicts we'll be navigating. outdoor dining or business, a loading zone and, that's a permit they're offering, permanent loading stones and they havzone and thatwill be foo

it will be one application process. and an important thing for either dining or business where folks are sitting or standing in the parking lane, the business will be required to install a barrier between the parking lane and the traffic lane and that's just to make sure no one gets hurt or steps out into traffic and we have a collision. and so the barrie barrier type,s really a broad range of barrier types we borrowed from the manual. we understand this wome will be another obstacle and tried to make this as flexible as possible. and so, in terms of application process, the applicant will fill out an online form, saying what space they want and self certified they're abiding by program rules and that includes things like just simple things

like keeping the place clean, moving furniture inside at night and maintaining an accessible table. within three days, the city will notify the applicant if they've been approved and if the shared spaces for outdoor dining, the permit holder will have to install a barrier, of course, if it's a slowing zone, no barrier needed. iin terms of opening up a full street, in every case where it's appropriate where there is an overarching merchant's association or business improvement district, community benefit's district, the city would like to see that body submit an application, just to sort of -- so we're negotiating with one point of contact that represents broadly the merchants

on the street or corridor. it's been raised that there are certain corridors and kind of smaller business districts that aren't represented by a former merchant's association and that's something we need to figure out from the city, how we'll accommodate that situation and make sure the groups have an opportunity to apply for street closures, as well. but generally speaking, we would want to be dealing with the merchant's association and we're helping the bodies will drive the collaboration and consensus building if this is to be successful. a street closure, plainly speaking, it could be a disruptive thing and so, we'll need to make sure that a large majority of participating businesses or businesses on the block that are conflicted that are all on board with the hours of the day, days of the week and exact dimensions of the closure, et cetera. and i should also note that a

key thing here and something that i'm just looking forward -- we'll have to navigate is ensuring that residential neighbors, folks that either live on the block or nearby are on board, as well. and so, i think -- and that is just the very first thing i've been telling folks, if they're interested in a full-street closure, get with your colleagues and -- get with your neighbors and try to work something out that works with everyone before the come to the city. i've mentioned this potential conflict, if there's a meeting group. unfortunately, that will be really, really difficult to do, most likely not allowed. the application process, you'll submit an application through an online portal and the still will do a feasibility review to say beeno way, there's a streetcar,

hey, there's a fire station and they need access at all hours. i'm sorry that can't work. and then, if it is feasible, i imagine it will take a few weeks of pre-detailed conversations with the city to sort of work out all of the different responsibilities and conditions under which this is allowed. and the association will be expected to implement, so staffing, providing furniture, barriers, as needed, et cetera. and just want to make a note that we're aware that if there's land controlled by other city departments that may be appropriate for these uses and mostly port and rec park, but potentially some real state division-owned land and we'll have a process by which businesses adjacent to these spaces can apply for their use and the department of jurisdiction will be the one, so meaning port, rec part and real

estate will determine if it's important. many of the spaces, just because you're located near a park, you know, for example, many parks are not appropriate for this type of use because they're used for recreation purpose. but i've been in close contact with port and rec park and they have started to identify sites that they think will be appropriate for this. so it's just another option for businesses that happen to be located really close to one of those spaces. so a few more details and the insurance requirements -- this is lower, i believe, than the comparable existing city programs that business will be expected to maintain a million dollars in general commercial liability, as well as worker's compensation and they'll need to name the city as additional insured and provide that endorsement, a waiver of su

subbrogation. commissioners, to the extent this program is rolled out, if there are businesses that want to participate and that's proving to be an insurmountable barrier, please let us know and. a pizza can occupy the situation in front of a neighboring business with the written permit of the business owner. there will be a simple written permission to me from that business owner and i would

upload that in the application process and be able to apply for those spaces, as well. and so i do think it's important to consider enforcement here and it will be both regular and complaint-driven, but given that this is going to be self-certified, i do think we'll find cases where folks are maybe not adhering to the safety rules, unfortunately, and so, members of the public will be directed to call that into 311 and promptly investigated and we'll try to sort of resolve that, if that can happen. but if we're not able to resolve it, the permits will be revoke. and this is just a good segway and permits are temporary and revoked at any time. either if the permit holder is not complying or if just the evolving nature of the emergency requires it. i would like that caveat and i hope when folks install bear barriers, it's attractive and

pleasant and sort of appealing to the neighborhood corridor, but i do provide this caveat so folks won't make huge investments because these are temporary permits and at the end of this, emergency, they'll be expected to remove those. thanks to much and happy to answer any questions that you have. >> thank you, ted. we appreciate you coming in and thank you for the excellent presentation. commissioners, do we have any questions? i guess i should open chat to find out. commissioner dooley. >> hi, i wanted to know, there's a lot of details in what you just presented and can that be made available to us to distribute to our merchant organizations? >> i would -- we're planning to publish the formal regulations

as well as open the application really, really soon, like in the next day or so. and so, i would just ask that you wait for that to come out, because that will be the law of the land. >> ok, thank you. >> commissioner adams. >> i was going to ask the same thing but this is an excellent program and our neighborhood, we just had our sidewalks widened about ten years ago and this will work out perfect. and i know the businesses i have talked to just can't wait for you guys to ok this and get this going and this is one of the best things you could have done and i really, really appreciate everything you've done doing this. >> thank you. commissioner huey. >> hi. i have a couple of questions. is there a guidance on

sanitaizatoin. iion.it will be the restaurants nearby. so they're kind of wondering, how do you staff? what are the guidelines? >> so i know the department of public health and city attorney are working hard to put out detailed rules and guidance for indoor retail and outdoor dining, which are slated to reopen shortly and i would just have to direct you to those and we can -- i think -- i'm not sure later in the agenda, if that was one of the other items that -- other staff would present on. and shared spaces stays silent

due to the evolving nature of that guidance. we don't want to be publicizing something and have that steal or outhat stale.i don't have that f the shared-spaces program. but i guess, dominica, if that's not covered later in t presentation, maybe we can connect off-line. >> thank you very much. just for public safety, i think. , it would be good to have some sort of protocol so you know when you're a resident sitting down at the space, that the space has been sanitized or cleaned. because if you go by the cleanliness, there's a wide variation, i think, in terms of how parklets are maintained and determining on the type of furniture. i think having some sort of guidance on that would also, i

think, help to be proactive, i think, and, like, consequences that could happen from that. and the other thing i wanted to note was, i really love that other neighborhoods are having a positive response to shared spaces. i think it's a great program and one thing our neighborhood is i think the merchants don't really see how it could be feasible because of questions like these, like who will be staffing this and who will be maintaining this and things like that. but we have a little group of residents there who are very interested in having more spaces. how do you kind of -- how do you weigh those things, like resident's desires? but this is a merchant-driven piece. how as a merchant could i -- i mean, we have lake street open as an open area and so we have

closed streets in our neighborhood and how would you suggest that i could direct somebody without telling them, like, no, we can't do it? just because feasibility may not work in our neighborhood, but we do share the same, you know, goals of wants to have more open spaces? >> well, i just want to make sure i fully understand the question. i'm thinking, clement has been identified as a street that might be appropriate for certain stretches of clement, to do one of those closures if that was something the neighborhood wanted do because there was no bus running down clement now and i think -- so i'm trying to imagine what the streetscape and dimensions are. so i guess what i'm getting at, i think this might be quite

feasible in some of the commercial corridors, at least thinking about the parking lane, which i think in many cases would be the sweet spot of getting a substantial amount of space and relative ease and time. but i think the question was about even about residents that want more open space for their recreational activities, which might be different than businesses taking shared spaces. was that the question? >> kind of. i don't want to create a situation in our neighborhood where we have residents who are upset with the merchants that may be don't find it feasible to be able to do it. like, even if there's the space, like, oftentimes people don't have the bandwidth to bring this program to their business. i don't want it to be a situation where residents are, like, then, upset with merchants that don't feel like it's possible. >> yeah. so i think that's a great question and i think that's

touches on something we've been thinking about a lot and i've been thinking about, which is what kind of ancillary resources and materials do we need to put together to make this as broadly available as possible? and so that's something that it's a moving target and we're working hard to identify if there are resources that the city can make available that would help with things like capacity or whatever those hurdles are that are preventing businesses from taking advantage that would help with those. >> and also, since you've mentioned you had some ideas or areas that you had highlighted or as you were working on the shared space's program, could that be shared, also, so that i have an idea or other merchants have an idea that these are good spaces we saw? and that way it generates some ideas. i know i've talked to a couple of people who are working really hard on creating kind of shared spaces, but it would be nice to

know what you're thinking in terms of an ideal shared space area. >> when i mentioned we thought about clement, that was me looking on a map of google, where the corridors are and which buses are running now and that was an informal thing. i don't at this time have any kind of city-wide guidance on that. and i think we can try to work on that and see if that's something to put forward. as i've been thinking about this a lot over the past few weeks, well, i think that parking lane, the use of the parking lane will be broadly appropriate for the most part, to the extent merchants want to take advantage of that. on the street closures, i think it will be -- like the many streets are possible, but it will just require a group of merchants and neighbors that want to make it happen and can

do the hard work of, you know, accommodataccommodating retailet want it to be open or closed at night. more so than technical concerns, the success or failure of this will be on groups that are able to do that kind of communication. >> perfect, thank you. >> awesome. commissioner cartahena. >> thank you, ted, for the presentation and thank you for working on this. i know we've been in constant contact. i had two things and one is for my constituency in the mission and a lot of cbo's are concerned that the speed this is happening, they're not being involved in the process or the perception of not being involved, they're concerned these changes can have further gentrification and i was

wondering want is your contact with the cbo's and what are your thoughts on that in. >> thank you so much for bringing that up. it's true that we've been moving at lightning speed on this and the goal for that, as you know, is because to provide some much-needed relief for the shelter-in-place. it hasn't been as deliberate and it hasn't included as many voices as it should have. and i hear you loud and clear and i'm working with colleagues that have been participating in some of the ongoing planning efforts and economic developments efforts to jump-start that conversation. and so i appreciate you underlining that executive lookk forward to those conversations happening. >> my second question is, as we transition to pretty much outdoor dining for the foreseeable future, my concern

is a problem that already existed was kind of like, it's a mix of quality of life and quality experience. what assistance is the city going to provide to businesses to ensure there's not aggressive panhandling to the customers outside and the streets are clean and there's not needles all around and make it a very positive experience as opposed to something that we don't want our patrons to experience? >> yeah. i think, again, that's a great question and it's something i've been thinking about. i don't have an answer for you right now. but i know that homelessness, obviously, and street behaviour are such tough issues that we're aware that's a problem and the success of this problem depends on some solutions. so i don't have an answer right now for you, but it's on my radar and we'll work with partners in the city to dress that. address that. >> thank you. commissioner dooley.

you're muted, kathleen. kathleen. >> any questions is when you returned to spaces should be like a parklet, are we talking about substantial construction on the part of the merchants or restaurants? or is a barricade sufficient? >> yes, excellent question and i apologize if i misspoke. this is very different than the parklet program and i try to be intentional in my language about it to make that distinction and this is way lower, some lower cost, lower design requirements than the parklet program and i'm imagining in most cases, it's a barrier that would comply with the parklet program like barrier specifications, but probably in

most cases, no real structure needed to be produced. just tables and chairs, a safety barrier and other sort of modest furniture and items. >> so will those guidance be provided so that people know exactly what will satisfy the barrier requirements? >> yes, those will be published along with the applications. >> thank you. >> thank you. commissioner ukukio. >> ted, thank you for being a general in the fight to save small businesses. i know you've been working so hard on this program and i appreciate it. i have some questions. you said the application process will be quick, as well as approval. what are thinking on turn-arounds and will they be completely online?

>> it depends on the shared space you're wanting to get. so for sidewalk, use of sidewalk, you apply online and if you can survive anything, you'll be mailed a permit and that permit is two days later, giving public works to check on insurance things and competent back if theget back ifthey find. >> will small business owners have to print out an application, sign something, fax it and scan it back? that could be enough friction to think, i can't do this right now. >> it's all online and the most burdensome thing, it will be getting the insurance documents that we're going to require and so that's the coi, the additional insured endorsement and waiver of subrogation and there's specific language that it has to be and i would imagine that getting the docs and

uploading that is the hardest part or it's a user-friendly online application. >> so on that, you say there might be leeway of folks having trouble with it and are you thinking about any additional costs that would come with adding the city as additionally insured or creating waivers for people that demonstrate it's an undue burden to them? >> great question. we have not resolved that yet and, frankly, i think waivers will be hard. like, because the city is self-insured, we have strict rules that the management team sets. what i've heard from the risk management team and in some of the outreach is that most businesses that have a normal lease or liquor licensed will have this level of coverage. i am aware there are probably businesses that don't and so, i think i would just ask that all of you please do share if you hear about cases where that's

the burden and we'll try to work out a way around it. >> got it. i have a couple more small questions. if people have an issue, they say they'll do something and it's not like they said, is the city going to be fining them? what's the process for correcting the way it's laid out in front? >> so, yeah, the first step is someone will come out and help explain what's wrong and if it can fixed simply, like, hey, you have three tables and you can fit two, you have to get rid of a table? this isn't quite in the right place or you don't have diverters. if it's simple things, i think we will hope that they can just fix them on the spot. if they can't be fixed on the spot, if it's something tougher, like if someone was operating in the parking lane with no barrier and tables were out there,

that's not safe and the city would say, your permit is revoked and you need to reapply. and so, i think there's a possibility of fines, but that would be after warnings. >> so diverters. so diverters are going to be required for putting tables and chairs on the sidewalk? >> yes. >> because the one thing i heard from a lot of small business owners in advance of this is that diverters can be expensive, the way that the city has asked them to be. there are substantial pieces of equipment and oftentimes custom made with the previous tables and chairs and are folks into kinds of diverters that might cost less like plants, that create a kind of barrier that don't require the same level of stringency than the previous diverters cost. >> scott regso the regs will alw diverters and have to meet dimensional requirements. i will note that i understand

this isn't a field of policy that i worked on before shared spaces, but i understand a lot of folks struggled with the table and chairs process and found it difficult. and i'll just note for clarity's sake, i've just taken the diverter requirements from the old program, but it will allow planters. >> that's ok. last question is, for the people who applied to have tables and chairs outside of their business in the months prior to this point, that came with an application fee. i think it was $600 or $900 and, as well, there are other fees associated with tables and chairs. is the department going to give the money back to the small businesses to aemploy tapply toe tables and chairs before this became free? >> i don't know the answer to that. that's a great question. i'm aware that i believe there is pending legislation that

would change the structure for tables and chairs and would lower or i think totally reduce it. for the question you talked about pending permits, i don't know. i don't want to make promises that the department of public works will be able to do that, but i can ask. >> before shared spaces was announced, i was, like, ok, at some point i'll put tables and shares out and i almost filled out the application, paid the fee and i wonder if the city is going to make this free. it really should. that would be great. so i didn't apply, but i bet there are small business owners that paid the $600 or $900 fee, assuming it would take weeks and weeks to get it approved and i think the right thing would be to give them their money back to have the same benefits as every other small business. is that something you would be able to follow up with the treasurer's office around. >> yes, i can follow up with that. >> thank you, ted. i appreciate it. >> thank you.

commissioner cartahena. >> hi, ted. another question. as a business owner, i'm excited but the speed we're moving in, never seen it in my life. a little concerned, i don't want the consequences of the people left behind and so add on, you t plans do we have for communities for fee mitigation or assistance? because when we do operate at the regular speed in the city, we never translate none of these things and now that we're moving at a listening speed, i'm concerned that all of th all ofe benefits won't be accessible to the communities of colour. >> so we will be translating all of the materials in terms of guidance and application form and so i am hoping that will help in terms of accessibility of the program.

there's no fees to waive, but just more broadly, we're working hard to see what we can come up with in terms of -- because there will be cases where some businesses need more help to take advantage of this. and we're working hard to identify what those barriers are and try to put together resources to be available, to help small businesses overcome that. and it's not something we've completed yet and, as you know, the budget situation that the city is in makes it hard, but we're committed to making it hard to find something. >> hi, just a really basic question because i think i just wanted to know, so is it ok that businesses are getting their -- they're applying for outdoor dining and you could put a

plaquard up. >> they can limit the use of the shared spaces to their customers. it's a great question because, of course, the existing parklet program is different than that and those are public open space. a business that has sponsored a parklet outside of their business, they will be -- if it's a restaurant, they'll be able to do table service there. or if it's a retail business and they wanted to set up some racks or shelves, you know, they could do those activities there. but, the the parklet would reman public and so, you would not be able to say to a member of the public not a customer, you can't sit here.

that's where the policy landed on that question. >> great, thank you. >> thank you. ted, i wanted to thank you for your hard work and your thoughtfulness that you're approaching this with and to all of the oewd staff for the extraordinary amount of work and consideration that they're putting into this. this is an extremely challenging time to launch such a comprehensive wide-ranging policy that will have an impact on everybody that lives here. so it's a huge challenge and from my perspective, you have stepped up in a big way and i think this is going to have a massive positive impact on small businesses in sanfrancisco. and so, you know, first, on behalf of the small business community, thank you and oewd for your work. this is really important stuff and you guys have been moving quickly and that's commendable

on every level. i had a couple of quick questions. first, i wanted to echo and amplify commission cartahena comments about accessibility. i know that's a priority for you, and it will be a priority for this commission, as well, soy want to second those comments. and along those lines, the insurance policy, has the city considered or priced out what the cost of a global insurance policy for the city might be? >> i don't think that's something that we've looked into yet. >> ok. it may be work taking a quick gander at and then, it could, perhaps, be a pass-through cost to successful businesses or

larger businesses and something that could be waived for businesses that are basing financial hardships and another opportunity might be if the city is unwill be to purchase a policy on its own, perhaps just negotiating a bulk rate with a carrier and before i go on to other comments, commissioner adams has a question on insurance and i wanted to give him a chance to weigh in on that point and commissioner adams. >> thank you, president laguana. i'm glad you brought that up. that's what i was thinking about. what we have in the castro, and this is what i think other merchant groups may want to think about, we have a blanket policy that covers our entire merchant area because we had to get it when we fed into the farmer's market and we have the

rainbow flag and we wound up buying a master policy for the sidewalk, for the sidewalks, coultocover such things and thee on it with their language. and i like your thoughts on that. and that's something, like, if the city won't do it, we can get the different merchant corridors to do that. it's a couple of grand, but maybe we can work out something with the city and i like that idea. that will help a lot of businesses. >> i appreciate that. my only concern about that comment is that there are many businesses that don't belong or cannot afford to belong to a merchant corridor association and -- >> ours covers everybody's, even if they're a mer chante merchan. there's a master policy for the streets. >> understood, but there will be

businesses that won't have that access to a policy like that, and so, i would still encourage ted to explore what the city can do to either acquire a city policy or negotiate a bulk rate on behalf of all of the businesses within the city. so those are possible options. you know, ted, you made the same presentation to the economic recovery task force and thank you. and on that call, it was brought to my attention that there were businesses putting tables up against bike stands because the bike stands that look like a convenient place to put tables and i asked during the economic recovery task force presentation if the oewd would consider

making sure that lifts have bice access to locking up their bikes. would that fall so the restrictions? >> it's an excellent question. i'm trying to think through it. certainly if it was one of those websitbicycle parking units thau see with circular metal elements that's in the parking lane, yeah, i really can't imagine mta would allow -- mta will not allow that to be made into a shared space and, frankly, i don't think those are easy to move. and so, is there a different type of policy of bike parking you're thinking of? >> i'll email you a picture of what happened in paloalto. it's like an arch, like a single

loop. i just want to make sure we don't go down that same path because that will obviously be upsetting to the biking community. and last thing we want to do is dis-incentivize people from using bikes if we're dis-incentivizing from using cars. i'll email you a picture afterwards and then we can have the conversation at a later date about whether that rises to the level of being included in restrictions. i take you at your word that sfmta would have an objection to any reasonable interpretation what a bike stand is. i did want to echo commissioner ukudio's comments about giving a are refund to people that may

have paid for permit, an outside locked permit during the covid-19 crisis and, perhaps, a bit farther back. it does seem that those folks are paying a fee where other people are getting it for free and that doesn't seem quite right. and last comment i have for you, and to me, this is one that's really important and really critical, it's critical to the city is it's critical to this program. and that's that in our communications around shared spaces, it is natural in the city to want to think about what are the regulations, what are the process, what are the forms and applications.

but i want to take a step back and look at the 60,000-foot view here. and i think what is really essential to making this program be something to be more than the sum of it parts is that we have to appeal to the inspirational element, the artistic element, that we have to encourage people to use these spaces creatively, to not just simile put tables and chairs out, but wherever possible be creative and think generously in terms of how you can decorate the space or liven it up. there was an article in the chronicle the other day that had ararchitectural renderings, thee

was lettuce 20 feet up and all different colors. to me, it seems this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to create magic in san francisco and that we will want to keep long after the virus is gone. and that should be a north star that we orient folks towards. we should be encouraging them to create something wherever possible that we'll want to keep and that we'll want afterwards, after this is all done. we'll be, like, that shit looks great. let keep it. [ laughter ]

this should be appealing to the architects and have them look at san francisco as a canvas, that this will make something magical that leaves us off better than we were before. and so, that's my feedback on that. and with that, i don't see any other commissioner comments and i want to thank you again for all of your hard work and we really appreciate you. >> thank you for allowing me to present.

>> we are very, very lucky to have ted conrad in doing this work and taking on the responsibilities of a different kind of land use during this time. and also, his very real commitment in our office of economic and workforce development's commitment to provide an equity frame to the work that we do. it is absolutely at the forefront of our minds and just to respond to the comments earlier, yes, we are absolutely balancing the need to move quickly for the small business community with an eye t towards racial equity and most

specificallily during the times we're in and it's been a value of ours under my leadership and mayor breed's leadership. i knows that's a principle and practise you have all been deeply supportive of and something that the staff holds very, very dear to heart, as well. again, most especially right now, with the sustained outcry against systemic racism and the injustices that are created because of it. and economic and workforce development plays a central part in doing that work. but i know i'm here to talk about the additional resources and also some of the framing around a phased reopening and i'm going to see if i can clumsily pull up the brief slide show that i have so i can guide us a residual bit. let me see if this works. can everyone see that? >> yes, we can.

>> and are you only seeing the main screen or the whole thing? >> the whole thing, but that's fine. don't labor over it i'll leave this for right now and thank you, commissioners, for bearing with me and in terms of the relief we have available, the small business community right now, i think many of you saw the press release we put out last week. due to our givetosf fund that allowed us to relief additional dollars for our grant program call the san francisco small business resiliency fund that was 1.5 until new funding, as well as the $5 million allocation that was made or the $5 million program that was

created because of a $1 million allocation that we made to our additional loan program partner, mission economic development agency. again, both those investments were made possible because of very, very kind philanthropic donors to the mayor's give to sf program and we really do want to encourage you and others and also the public who may be watching right now to continue to share that opportunity because the need does not end. it continues during this time that allows us to provide relief in the form of housing stabilization funds, food security, relief for our immigrant workers and, of course, for our small businesses through grants and loan products. additionally, we also have the technical assistance available both through our office, small business center and the small business through regina and her staff, through our staff at oewd and then our partners on the ground in community. and in addition, we have the

california department of insurance issue some fact sheets around how insurance policies can be leveraged during this time. (please stand by).

-- that focus on the neighborhoods that we have been doing deep equity work in, the bayview, the mission, chinatown and central market and tenderloin. to make sure that those neighborhoods where we've been doing deep work, that that work can continue in those areas. and more specifically we have begun to loosen some of the restrictions of sole proprietors could benefit from the program during this time. that's been a priority for us as well. in addition to that, we wanted to make sure that at least 50% of the grants that are given out in this new round are supporting businesses that have been in operation five years or longer. it is a symbol of the work that we are doing right now to ensure that our longer timenesses are getting some extra guaranteed attention through this process. and then finally thinking about

the phasing that we'll talk about a little later on. today is the $500,000 that is being held specifically for those small businesses that will be opening later on in the process while they are hoping to hold on and struggling to hold on during this time, because they have not been allowed to reopen yet. that -- those dollars are going to be specifically tailored to businesses like those found in the later phases that will not open until the middle of july and thereafter. for the san francisco health, the hardship emergency loan program, really is focusing on those long-time businesses as well, 25% of them, five years or longer, will be guaranteed to have access to that loan program. and also specifically gauze of f the work they do in our organizations and those who have not accessed federal or state relief programs for themselves or their workers that this loan program can go a long way in

supporting them. soar we're very deeply grateful for the work of mission economic development agency and their ability to work with state-wide lending partners in partnership with the state of california to leverage our million-dollar novemberment. and because of it expanding out to $4 million additional funds that can be made available for small businesses. again in terms of our response, we talk about it again and again and i think that it's important to remember, especially as we're dealing with the frustrations here that we led the nation in terms of slowing the spread of covid-19. well, i think that we're focused on the current moment and i think that it's important to remember the context in which we're operating with. potentially thousands of lives saved in addition to a health care system that has been spared dealing with the ethical impacts that we've seen across the country in terms of people being turned away from hospitals or not being able to be taken care of in a humane way.

that action saved lives and created a very strong condition for us to be able to manage this process moving forward. as all of us know and as ted so eloquently talked about, we have been moving towards and working vigorously around recovery while also continuing to respond and to prepare for additional public health concerns that could be created during this time. but we are really focused on these next steps, clear guidance, answering questions in real-time. and a working support for our businesses. the state phases are really the building block or what we call the ceiling to doing this work. you're seeing as the mayor announced earlier an incremental opening that are metered around health indicators to make sure that we can maintain stability and management of this crisis as we begin to see more circulation of the public on the streets. and visiting our businesses, which is what we want to see them do while we're being responsible about interacting in

public and quite specifically supporting our small business community. you're seeing that in time periods of four weeks as we look and consider the risk and mitigations. and then also our continued preference to be coordinated with our regional partners, even though at times there are differences. and that coordination still remains important in terms of best practices, what we're seeing on the ground and what the impact of the choices that are being made are having in terms of those indicators. the roadmap is important because people are looking for guidance. not everyone is happy, we know that, but, certainly, it's important to provide at the very least some dates that people can begin planning towards so they can make the very real and hard decisions about how they move forward and manage their business and their workforce in moving into the weeks and the months ahead as we continue to reopening. that goal that is the miss right -- mission right now to support the business community and the small business community at large. again the state phases as a

foundation for us, the top line that you see there in terms of california laying out, again, a four-phased process which we're managing and following as well, you'll see in phase two that we really are talking about different phases, different timelines, in terms of what businesses, lower-risk businesses, are allowed to open over time. again, with the focus this week on indoor retail being allowed. outdoor dining happening. and then some clearer guidelines around how offices can begin to come back to work. both in terms of what we believe is a way that we can manage that re-opening process, but also to reflect a very real planning that's already been underway from the business community in terms what we're seeing around the percentages of the workforce that people want to bring back. i can answer some questions around that i think a little bit later on in terms of why that is so nuanced. and then, of course, moving into phase three and four moving forward. i know that it's a lot and it's

a very dense process and a confusing process which is why we're going out and having conversations with as many stakeholders as possible as often as possible to answer some of these very, very basic and yet very dense, dense volume of questions that we all have, the nitty-gritty, in terms of how the policy works. the nitty-gritty to what degree can my business be open. the nitty-gritty about my health plan and where do i -- where do i apply, who do i send it to, what is required of me. all of those pieces are keenly in our sights when we're thinking of the small business community from that perspective to make this process as easy as possible in an already difficult environment. so i know that this is a lot, but it is a lot, just in terms of how much we have to manage in this process. and just know, i mean, i've had a lot of very personal and difficult conversations with

small business owners who don't understand why they're not being considered until a later date. and what i have to do and share with them as i have shared with some of you, i have very real conversations that we are an advocate for small businesses in a business community in alignment with our city priorities to manage and maintain public health during this time, but we are a strong advocate. and the very real phrases that people use, the very real appliance of what matters to a small business and what matters to a livelihood and what matters to employees' livelihood and sense of safety, both at work and at home, are very real narratives that are absolutely being shared at policy table whses we're having these very arduous discussions. i think that some of the movement that you have seen and some of the movement that you'll continue to see, not only at state level but here at the local level, is reflective of that level of conversation to constantly push ourselves to make sure that we are managing

this holistically through must pell lenses to get people up and running. and then also the very real complications around what it takes for someone to even go back to work and how to make the public feel comfortable about taking advantage of the spaces that we want to see. and in commissioner laguana's words, to continue to be relative and vibrant during this time. so just in terms of the phased -- and some of the indicators that we're looking at -- surveillance, of course. a number of new cases and the number of days that are flat in terms of cases coming online and the number of hospitalized patients. is that flat or decreasing over a period of 14 consecutive days? the number of deaths that are occurring as a very real -- very real indicator for us. hospital capacity, in terms of making sure that we can have the toyota take on the surge in this way. testing -- the number of tests that are being conducted.

we're in a good place right now. we are over the average that you see here currently. at this time in terms of the daily -- the daily data points that i'm seeing, in terms of the number of tests that are being provided and also how that work continues to be important in making sure that our communities and our most vulnerable communities, specifically communities of color in the latin x populations and the vulnerable neighborhoods like tenderloin and for our african american and black communities and in the bayview and western edition, being able to have access to testing during this time. and, of course, contact tracing to make sure that once we identify people who are sick that there's the capacity in place to make sure that we can reach those individuals. and then, finally, the conversation around protective equipment, personal protective equipment, that the city has on hand to help to deal with these efforts on a consistent basis. so that's basically the work continues. i do want to shout out -- and i

want to do a bit of congratulations that life goes on in this environment for many people. in good ways and in bad ways. the bills still come. children are still born. and we had our director of small business services, angel gardoz, over the weekend have his baby girl on saturday morning in the midst of trying to develop all of these programs, on the phone on the way to the hospital with his wife. and trying to make sure that he is supporting his small business community during this time with the last hours that he had before he takes maternity leave. it's reflective of the real stresses that all of us are committed to addressing to make sure that we're doing everything that we can for the small business community. i just want to make sure that i am being very clear about that, that we are not -- we're not hitting every single mark that we can, but we are noticing when

we aren't and correcting immediately. the stresses that the small business community is facing are ones that we are internalizing. it's certainly not the same. but we are committed to addressing those issue. so i i wanted to make sure to leave this up here for a few more moments so people know where to go, if they're a business, a worker or non-profits to come to the website and to gain access to information, real-time information about what resources are available to you. both as a business, small business, and as a worker and non-profits who serve our community holistically. and a shoutout to reginaa and her team to consistently administer the hotline so that people can get a real person or a real voice on the phone who responds to them directly. i know that dominica has been doing a lot of that work and others. i really just wanted to continue to note the level of the staff

commitment there that has really, really driven home how important this work is at this time. and then also for our workers to make sure that they know that they're protected, that they have resources available to them during this time as well. we're an ecosystem and we all rise and fall together. and we need to constantly remind ourselves of that as we balance this very, very difficult time during this process of covid-19 and reopening. but with that i'm very, very happy to answer as many questions as i can. and i think that i took that out. okay, great. and thank you for having me. >> thank you, director torres. and on behalf of the commission we'd like to thank you for all of your work. i know that it's non-stop. and a hearty congratulations to

the birth of his daughter. commissioner adams? >> commissioner adams: congratulations, angel, that's awesome. and you and your team have been incredible throughout this whole process. i just have to commend you. you guys have just been great. and i just want to bring up really quick about office buildings because i've been going in my office once a week now and i get -- and i go to my -- you know, in the financial district, it's all mom and pop businesses that support the lunchtime crowds. any -- and there's a lot of -- there's a lot of them that don't know, like, when things are going to get back to normal. i know that with office buildings the mayor has said that if you have to work from your office, you can't work remotely, that's okay. but any other guidance on office buildings or is that more of a phase three?

>> more specific guidance will be coming shortly, both for the time period that we're in right now, commissioner adams, as well as in the future. again, everything is going to be managed through this phased approach to bringing people back to the workforce. and that is -- that has worked because it's keenly on our minds because we want to make sure that people can come back to work in a safe way and making sure that people feel welcomed back to work in a safe way with a safe experience because we know how much that value is going to be created when people are back on streets. and also timed with as we see indoor retail beginning to open and timed as we begin to see outdoor dining begin to be embraced, which we want it to be done in a responsible way. and we know how important that is. so that's why we're asking for more clarity. we should be seeing that pretty shortly later on this week. >> commissioner adams: my concern with office buildings

was the mom and pop lunchtime places. >> exactly. >> commissioner adams: and i have spoken to a few of them and they all seem to lack answers from me, which they're all following with the city guidelines. and, again, great job with you and your team. >> thank you. and we'll be reaching out the moment that we have any specific guidance when it goes up on the s.f. gov site and we'll include it on our site and we'll send that to regina and the office of small business so she can share it all with you. >> president laguana: commissioner huie. >> commissioner huie: hi, joaquin, thank you so much for being here today and for your presentation. i just really wanted to thank you for your help with so many of the -- i mean, obviously, the entire reopening effort but some of the sectors that you and i have worked on. and, you know, i just -- i think that it was quite a learning experience. and i think that, you know, the way that you supported, you

know, the sector for health care and for dentistry to open up was commendable. so, thank you very much. and i noted that retail reopening went distinctly. there was more of a proactive feedback that is still being gathered, i think, up to today. so i really like -- i really appreciate that, you know, it's been an evolution and not like a one -- you know, one-time kind of, like, situation. so i appreciate that you guys took the feedback and that you guys have really evolved the process to garner -- to get more feedback prior to directives going out. so thank you very much. >> thank you so much, commissioner. just if i may just briefly respond. i think that it's indicative of the leadership of the mayor. i think that it's indicative of the -- of the policy considerations and priorities of

the board of supervisors. and also i think that it's just in the d.n.a. of our office to continually move in this direction around getting feedback, building in more time while also moving as quickly as we can to get going. i think that it's just indicative of a constantly evolving process so that we can reach as many people as possible and that when we've made mistakes we own up to them. and we consistently apply common sense, logical framework for how we are reopening. when it doesn't make sense, just being honest about that. because i think what people want to hear right now with so much confusion is just some straight talk about what is and is not known. that's why it's important that ted said in his previous presentation, i don't know and i'll get back to you. and that's a valid response, especially in this moment, because we're all juggling so much. and i think that your patience for that is really important as well. as long as we get back quickly. [laughter] that's important for us. >> commissioner huie: i think that the loop is almost closed

on the dentistry reopening. i think that there's still one piece that needs to be addressed in the directive itself. i'm not sure exactly what -- what the status is of that right now. but i think that we are waiting for the testing to hopefully to be -- to be a recommendation. >> that's right, that's right. >> commissioner huie: go ahead. >> there's no specific date that i have in terms of when that correction and adjustment will be made. but my understanding based on a conversation that were sent back to the head of the dental society is that after their conversation with the public health director, that that is forthcoming because of advocacy and because of those conversations. so thank you again for that. >> commissioner huie: for sure, thank you. and just one little thing was i think that in the last meeting about recovery and this one, you know, oftentimes you have it on

the little chart where it talks about how high versus low risk. and one of the things that i was -- i feel like one of the little nuances that might be also adding the high versus -- not low need, but maybe not urgent needs. because i think that child care is specifically like, you know, a high risk but it's considered on the low-risk kind of area. but it's really a high need. and i feel that maybe sometimes the merchants are pushing for reopening or feeling impatient for reopening. if it's kind of understood in terms of -- for sure, not low need because we need all of the businesses. but kind of wrapping our minds around just the concept of, like, certain industries like child care. we do need to get going in order for the other industries to get going. so allowing us to kind of being able to hold -- a little more complexity, i guess.

>> got it. i think that's helpful and i have been looking for just some very simple language to help us to articulate that. i think that is important. thank you. >> commissioner huie: sure, thank you so much, joaquin. >> president laguana: commissioner zouzounis. >> vice-president zouzounis: thank you, director for being here and for giving, you know, the shoutout to all of our oewd and staff. i totally second that. and i really appreciate everybody right now, especially. i had a question regarding if there's any sunsets of the existing health orders that may have become irrelevant due to these new reopening phase orders? in particular the supplemental which requires a mandatory curfew for type 20 and type 21

off-sale alcohol license permit holders. there is an exemption, from my understanding, for businesses over 5,000 feet. so this has become an equity issue where safeway can be open past 8:00 p.m., whereas small corner stores and residential and our opportunity neighborhoods as you have called them are forced to close and not sell other goods because of their alcohol license and their limited square footage. so that has been consistently confusing order where we haven't gotten clarity on if there's, you know, restaurants inside. does that change? can they only not sell alcohol after 8:00 or do they have to close their doors? the police don't understand whatever nuance we have been provided on that as a sector. the police don't get the memo. so they're just shutting people down. and so if that is -- if that supplemental in particular, that

type 20 and type 21 order of curfew, is irrelevant now that everything is reopening, i think that we need some outreach around it. both to the agencies and to the sector. and then also, like, a public announcement of that 8:00 p.m. curfew being sunset. and also if there's going to be any d.o.c. or any type of outreach around any new d.p.h. guidance for businesses, because, yeah, that's always a need. you know, as the new guidance comes online, especially for our immigrant and harder-to-reach food service businesses. outreach and an understanding of compliance is huge. so i had a question about that plan as well. thank you. >> certainly. thank you, commissioner. my understanding as of this moment, things can change so don't hold me to this, is that that order is still in effect.

i have not heard about an amendment being made to that order, but i will follow up and i will get you an answer as quickly as i can this week in terms of the standing and the status of the conversation with regards to that discrepancy between the corner stores and larger businesses and the hours of operations and what spaces may be available there from an equity lens perspective, okay? so i will -- i will work on that piece together with regina regin that. and secondly to the d.p.h. guidance, as you know that many of the people that are assigned to the community engagement team at the emergency operations center are employees that are usually on two-week terms. we're having conversations this week about how that workforce is being maintained, sustained, and/or changed/expanded to deal with these outreach efforts. and then where we are not able to do that we're also talking about right now about what existing community-based partnerships we can leverage to

help us with doing this outreach as well. it would be great to hear if there are specific hotspots or specific community where is there might be other ways that we can bring people together based on hours that are most beneficial to the business community. and the immigrant business community or the bilingual business communities, how to get that guidance to them in a different way that might be useful as well. i think that it would be worth looking into. if there are specific -- like i mentioned -- the areas for -- or populations that need to be -- that need to be reached out to, that would be helpful for us to know so we can prioritize. i for one have been pretty amazed, especially among -- i live in the southern part of the city, heavily immigrant, diverse population here in the outer, outer, outer mission of geneva. and i always bring this up but my market, spanish language owned, immigrant owned, business

and market -- one of the moments they received the information and the turnaround time was like that. and so people need guidance and it changes. the same thing is true for specific spectaculars that we have down here on almanie so the same thing applies with the amount of work. when people are given the information, commissioner, compliance happens. and so if we contact directed to the right place and community, i think that will go a long way. thank you. >> president laguana: great. thank you. commissioner dooley. >> commissioner dooley: hi, joaquin. >> hi, commissioner dooley. >> commissioner dooley: so we have been working in mission with the supervisor and getting this rolled out for using the -- using the parking lane. what my question is -- we've been told that they already sent

in an application for -- via the merchant source association. is that all just thrown out now? and they have to start over? >> no, i don't think there should be any starting over that's going on, based on what my understanding is of the nitty-gritty, commissioner. but let me make sure of that. so just in terms -- this is more like an administrative question of if anything has to be repeated begin the new program that we have in place? yeah -- no, there shouldn't have to be a replication of issues. so let me check in with ted and the team on that. i'm talking about them right after this. >> commissioner dooley: that's perfect, thank you. >> absolutely. >> great. i'll let her know that i'm late. so give me one second. okay. >> president laguana: underscoring how much is being

juggled here. so joaquin, not seeing any other commissioner questions, i wanted to, you know, to once again commend and thank the oewd, and the mayor, and the board of supervisors. the professionalism exhibited during this unprecedented crisis has been by and large extraordinary. and i think that we can look at other cities to understand just how well san francisco has done and how fortunate we are to have the leadership that we do. and i in particular wanted to highlight, you know, what you said about ted being clear about what he knew and what he didn't know. i noticed that too. and that candor is deeply appreciated in this moment because it lets everybody know where we are, and it lets us concentrate on what we don't

know and work together to resolving those questions. so, thank you for that. i don't think that they have received as much credit as it should, and it's been an extraordinarily successful program. it's allowed a lot of private contributions to help make up the difference where the city, which is facing a budget shortfall, would struggle to do so. so that program has been really been successful. and it's good to start to see the program roll out and deliver measurable results to people that are hurting. also i wanted to thank your office for coordinating with s.p.a. on the i.e.d.l. for businesses affected by damage due to the protests, to be able to access the iedl. that's the kind of second level, third-level thinking, that is -- we're just continuing to exhibit

of trying to get in front of things and make it easier for the businesses to respond.

>> as a concern from these business groups is how we're going to process these outlier situations and how do businesses communicate, whether it's appeal or request, you know, what they feel are their reasonable exceptions and if you can help them understand what that process looks like from your end. >> certainly. i think it will be useful to continue to utilize the sfosb or 554-6134.

again, that's 554-6134 or sgosb@sfgov.org as an email address. some folks have been reaching out directly and i encourage people to do, because it helps me to work with my staff and the office on getting questions answered to these nitty-gritty things and how we're going to work out some of these issues. the again, the same concern exists around the respiratory activity to take place in a closed environment, irrespective of a number of people in a space and can that move sooner. i'm looking for any activity that we can see that can be well managed of people coming into a small space and maintaining space between individuals and so we're asking public health for that guidance, too, and

commissioner huey's rat respons, the rate we do that is while understanding for every small business that has this question, there is an urgent need in terms of revenue desperately needed in as quick a time as possible that allows this to have something coming in while dealing with this issue. but in those areas, please utilize the email, the phone number for those reaching out to me to continue to reach out to me is all of you commissioners have my cell phone and do not hesitate. it's how i know i don't have a blind spot because there is so much going ton and having your input and your voices, your considerations, concerns is deeply important because we can't manage everything just through our own thinking. and certainly, as much as i would like to be on the street a lot more often as i normally do

my job, in this environment being bloo glued to this chair d screen makes it different, right? and so you're my connection. the merchants are my connection on the block in a much deeper way just than here at my table in my livingroom and i do appreciate that and don't hesitate to reach out on questions like these. it's very helpful. >> commissioner ukudio. >> director torez, thank you for your presentation. this is such an important moment we're living in and that we're having this conversation. i was appointed to this commission a couple of months before all of this and was not expecting this commission to be as involved in the economic future of our city as it's become. so first of all, thank you for your service and all of the har

work. of your hard work. you're kind of like an octopus head with all of these tentacles. i wanted a reality check. what should we be expecting in terms of permanent closures of our businesses? do you feel this will have done irreprable damage and how bad to you think this is?

>> i want to answer what is possible and always possible for people in san francisco and san francisco small businesses across divertty, across industry. there's to denying there has been an absolute traumatic shock, absolute traumatic shock to our small business community and the workers that they employ and their holistic families and communities. that cannot go unnoticed or un-recognised. it's just real. the reports that we see, the stories that we read about closures that are already happening, not only in san francisco but across the country, across the bay area as a whole are maybe just the tip of the iceberg. we don't know yet. we don't know to what degree

this is going to be devastating as a small community and industry and entire economy or if it will be a sustained blow and bruise that needs time to heel. again, it's very real what's happening right now, which i why i think so many of these moments of silver lining of relief provided, the reality and the real true en efficacy and valuef hope that's being provided to small businesses as we open during this time, sometimes allows us to move forward. in very difficult times. poulthat's all been the san francisco way and that's always been the san francisco ethos. what's empowering is that some of the work that's necessary has already been underway and this just now a bit more air behind it, to make sure it happens in this moment.

and issues of how we deal with our public spaces, of how we deal with shared paces, o spacet we're willing to see or not see, especially when it comes to racial injustice and systemic racism, there's a correlation to what we need to see in this moment. and during this movement, as i'm constantly reminded of people here in san francisco but elsewhere. i think we have to wait and see what the impact of our actions right now will have. so i think it's too early to call the game and i don't think we're there yet and i think you're seeing studies that have been disproven in terms of how quickly how small businesses, certainly, a restaurants, certainly, have been in this moment. and surprisingly, how fast

government has been in this moment, which i think redefined what a government is during times like these. i think that's real, as well. a lot more work to be done, commissioner, and we're not there to call the game yet and we're here to continue playing it and continue the metaphor and we're in it to win. if i could be a little cheesy for a moment, but i really think having a game mentality right now with such high stakes is important and it really will take a lot ofs rising to the occasion. i just want to say, i know that this weighs on all of you the way that it weighs on so many of us because we have a collective responsibility to serve people right now and people are hurting. in ways that we can't even truly fathom. certainly looking across the screen right now, when we talk about race and the pain simply

based on the history and color of our skin. there is so much economic injustice we're working collectively on. i think that work needs to continue as we go on through these days and weeks and months ahead. so for this opportunity i'm very grateful is i think we'll be very, very proud as we already should be in terms of the work we're doing right now. >> thank you, director torez. >> dr. torez, that was beautiful and well said. thank you. we appreciate you and we appreciate the oewd and this is just such an incredible moment and, in particular, i appreciate what you said about hope. i think we have to focus.

we have to open up for public comment. is anyone on the line for public comment? dominica, sf gov. >> great. you're free to go, directo, dirr torez. thank you. >> next item.

>> discussion on draft statement in support of "black lives matter" and the view of the office of mall business mission statement, discussion and possible action item. this is item 3 and sf gov tv, i have a slide to present.

>> so obviously events have been fast-moving, seems to be the tenor of the times and we drafted a statement over the weekend on behalf of the commission in support of the protests and "black lives matter." the san francisco small business commission wishes to express its strong support for in solidarity with protesters in san francisco and all over our country and the world who seek an end to racism

and prejudice. we believe everyone should have an opportunity to build a better future and skin color should never be a barrier to doing so. as small business owners, we recognise we have power, however modest, to help create the equity that protesters are seeking. we commit ourselves as a commission to using this power to do so. and in recognition of the efforts of protesters, we will be amending our mission statement to reflect this commitment and establish it as a core principle guiding our commission. we commend the efforts of mayor breed and the board of supervisors who have used this moment to advance the goals of equity and justice to both words is action. we are your allies and will do everything in our power to make san francisco a better city for all. we wish to thank and commend the team organizers who organize the mission at the high school last weekend, bringing 18,000 people

together in peace and solidarity. you give us joy, hope and inspiration for the future. we are humbled by your leadership. finally, we want to acknowledge the small business owners all over san francisco who have expressed local support in solidarity with protesters, even though in some cases, their own businesses were damaged during the demonstrations and despite already struggling due to the global pandemic. we've never been prouder of this community and are grateful for the kindness and leadership san francisco small businesses are exhibiting. i open this up to commissioner comment. >> and i will click on to the next page which has the mission statement up. so i am proposing that we amend

the mission statement to include equity as a core principle and value and i see commissioner cartahena, you are recognised. >> president, i just wanted to thank you personally for taking the lead in this and to everybody. this was something that sharky actually brought up and honestly, we're all with it, but i just want to show everybody the unity that we have on this commission and the mindfulness of the needs of our various cultures and socioeconomic backgrounds and that we're united and that we're here. our purview is to protect small businesses but we stand in small businesses and stand in solidarity with all of the protesting. and we're so proud of our youth, organizing in such a capacity and also doing it so peacefully and that shows the world what city we have in san francisco

and i'm proud to be a part of this moment and i unfortunately, it has to take something to heinous of the injustice that goes on daily for people of co color in this country. >> commissioner dooley. >> thank you for putting this together so recalledl rapidly as part of our duty as a city family to move forward with carrying this work on. thank you. >> thank you, i agree, as well. >> so that everybody understands what is in front of us, domincia put up the flag there of our

mission statement. we may not be able to draft the language during this meeting, but what we would be proposing is to amend the language to include equity as a concept -- excuse me, as a core principle. and i think between this meeting expect next meeting, we can come up with draft language. there wasn't enough time to do it with the level of thoughtfulness that i thought was necessary. and so, perhaps, working with communities and input from others, to come up with language that would identify that as a core principle guiding this

commission and i see several commissioners have comments and i'll continue to recognise you. commissioner ukudio. >> thank you, commissioner laguan. laguana. i want to say how appropriate it is the small commission take this up. i remember going through the process of figuring out how to even start a small business and what was involved and i would go to the sba and take the free or low-cost courses on second and market. and i remember going into the rooms and thinking how diverse the rooms were and how all ages and all genders and all races and ethnicities were represented in this community of folks who wanted to strike out on their own and live their dream. and i was lucky enough to receive small business of the year from the state senate. i remember going to the state senate and seeing all of the small business awards this past

year and being so proud of how much of a representative sample small business owners seem to be in our city. i don't know the exact figures, but i'm pretty sure family-owned in small industries. so opening up a small business, especially if it's promoted and facilitated by a city can be one way to actually create equity in a society. and i see that as definitely something that we should be fighting for. and just taking my own example, i moved to san francisco with no money in my pocket. i knew no one in the city. i never could have dreamed of owning my on small business and now i have the privilege of having my own spot and i can support myself through a small business that i had the ability to create and, you know, i don't come from a wealthy family. my business was not paid for by anyone. i had a lot of help to make it happen, but now i can stand on

my own two feet. that means a lot for me and i think it can be a mechanism to lift people up out of poverty and give them power and support their families. i'm glad we're doing this. thank you, commissioner l aragua for taking this on. i think a lot of us participated in the marches and i was proud to see how small businesses stepped up to support the protesters, the marches, whether through delivering water and masks and food, opening up their space for shelter for bathrooms and putting signs up in their boards and windows and using the physical space that we have as one of the few things that we can contribute, the actual physicality to amplify the message of support and allegiance and community and it's been really beautiful to see our community, the small business community do our part and support the moment of fire

that we see in our country and in our city. so i'm proud of the small business community and city and how it has shown up for this movement and i'm looking forward to continuing to do so. so thank you, sharky. >> commissioner adams? >> i want to echo what everybody said with william and manny have said and i think we need to do this. i was just looking -- if you listen to our conversation on the item beforehand, you know, equity came up a lot and in we make things happen and work, we need to have that in our mission statement and i would totally support changing that. thank you. >> commissioner huey. >> yes, i mean, i totally agree and i think this is a really good piece to add to our mission statement. i think it's important.

i think that this has been something we've been striving for and to be able to say it publically is really important. one little piece that i -- that was the first time i think i had seen the draft of what you had written and i thought it was really good. one little thing was just the piece about however modest and i don't know if i -- i just think the small business community has been such leaders in this whole space and they do have such an opportunity. i would like to empower small business leaders and small business owners to really be engaged in their communities and understand the power that they do embody just by owning a business there. and think, you know, that small business ownership can be a huge shift for not only somebody's future but also for communities. and so i just want to not be too

humble in our stance, but i think we're really important in all of our communities and i think that this is where people connect and this is where people share ideals and are going to be communitcommunicating and i thie an important part of this conversation. i totally agree, also, that my hope for joining this commission when i joined was to be able to give opportunities for mom and pop kind of businesses, new immigrant opportunities, like, people who never thought they could do something for themselves but wanted to or had a desire to. people who just want to hustle. i just wanted that to be possible in sanfrancisco and for people to be able to feel empowered by that and then hopefully spread that sense of empowerment. and so i do love the statement

and i just want us to really share that sense of, like -- i've seen it across the board. we're all leaders. >> i'm really honored to be working with you all in this body and i think that every time we meet, i feel like we become more of a proactive body and we embody the sentiment of our greater business community and try to advance the goals of making this city more equitable for all. i fully support a change to our mission statement and charter. i know we talked about bringing the equity lense is working with the office of racial equity prior to this recent surge of

protests and demands. i like that the shawwe see a lor voice is being used as a wedge and a tool to be legitimatized, the greater movement that's happening right now. the tenderloin prior to this has experienced a lack of response to damage, property destruction

and this is common in low-income communities, where the police are not responding at an appropriate rate and this is an issue that remains to be the case. in terms of some of the action items that i know, the industry and merchant groups i'm part of will be taking up is increasing our mutual aid and response networks. we'll be partnering with groups who have resources and training for alternatives to calling the police or lean looking at talking to the department of public health and having some training with how do you deal with someone who has mental health issues and doing something in front of your business that is affecting customers, and whatnot. i think we need to expand the resources in the small business community and i think this is a very appropriate time to call on

our city to end and get off the books all of our broken window era spoils and fees policies an. we talked about this before but i think this is more important now, fees that are preemptive pupunishments that incriminal businesses for loitering, gra graffiti and those sorts of things that are used as a tool for the criminalized communities around these small businesses, especially ones in the lower income areas. so those are tangible demands that the small business community and i know the sector i'm in will be taking up and i'm really proud to be support this statement, as well. so thanks, everybody. >> thank you, commissioner. commissioner ukudio.

>> i just forgot that i wanted to mention the potential idea for us in addition to changing the mission statement, there is, of course, a national movement to identify black-owned businesses in cities and to file support to those businesses as a way of altering the systems of power and, of course, we have only about 3% of san francisco is african-american, something like that. this is happening to cities all over the country and show we want to walk the walk and not just talk the talk.

>> director, do we identify businesses and would we collate a list that commissioner ukudio recommends? >> director, the city does not gather demographic data in relationship to business ownership in that manner. that said, there is already a development of black-owned restaurants and i can work with oewd who does in our neighborhood, in the investment neighborhoods program and we can work to identify businesses, black-owned businesses in the city. >> commissioner dooley.

(indiscernible). >> black-owned businesses and restaurants that is being gathered and sent out regularly. and so, the next time it comes up on my facebook feed, i will send it to agenda. >> thank you. >> this is regina. and so, director -- actually, director rebas just texted me to say they're ar working on it no. so we'll get it to you. >> that would be fantastic. and so seeing no other commission -- i guess i should move to the amendment. i am moving that we amend our mission statement to include equity as a core principle guiding this commission.

do i have a second? hold on one second dominica, i see you're saying public comment, but shouldn't i move on this before public comment? or do i take public comment? >> you take public comment before the motion. >> before the motion, great. >> any public comment? >> no callers. >> great, seeing none, public comment is closed. and i move that we -- whatever i just said. [ laughter ] >> can you say it again? >> ok, i think i said it better last time. i'll try to do my best. i move that we amend our mission statement to include the principle of equity as a core value guiding this commission. >> i'll second.

>> motion by commissioner laguana to amend the small business mission statement, to include the core value to the commission. seconded by commission adams. role call. >> i'm sorry core principle guiding this commission. >> great. role call vote. (role call).

>> motion passes 7-0. >> thank you. and thank you, everyone. it's an honor and privilege to serve with all of you. the next item, please. >> so before we move on to the next item, the statement, i believe, if we want to make it an official statement of the commission, then we do need to take action on this statement, as well. >> and so, i would move that we post this statement to our website as the commission's statement in support of "black lives matter." >> i'll second. >> motion by commissioner laguana to pose the aforementioned statement to the

commission's website and seconded by commission adams. and role call vote -- (role call). >> motion passes 7-0. >> thank you. next item, please. >> item 4 continued discussion update on the city budget and budget adjustment required of the office of small business, fiscal year 2021 and possible action item is the director of the office of small business. >> thank you, commissioners. i'm tani'll take a moment to she screen with the budget information that was provided

with the agenda. i wanted to give you background of the office since we have a good number of commissioners who are relatively new to the commission. so the small business commission as an official commission started in may of the year 2,000. one fte is assigned to the commission and we haven't had an increase in staffing support

since the year 2000. the current fte, which i has two funnings. onfunctions. charter commission, nearly all charter commissions have a dedicated commission secretary and the small business commission is a chartered commission and it became a chartered commission in 2003 and at to time, you do not have a dedicated commission secretary. charter commissions have policy staffs that do not fulfill commission secretarial duties. so they may be staff that works in different areas of a department, but there's never a sharing of secretarial duties and policy staff duties.

and the funding that supports the commission comes from general funds. the office of small business is also general funded and it has the small business assistance center. that came into being in may of 2008 and through a ballot measure. it's assigned -- it opened with three fte's and currently we have three fte's with the office of small business and we have one person who speaks spanish, one who speaks chinese. we have one temporary position that i would say to recently get but the temporary positions are not permanent positions as the three fte's. and so it is a position for three years.

and we have 19 months remaining and the individual who fills that position speaks spanish. our client services in the first six months this fiscal year of 2020 increased over the fiscal year. we have my staff and dominica has responded to 2,380 requests for assistance. and varying degrees in terms of assisting them through varying degrees and navigating the process, access to what financial assistance, how to best handle dealing with their staff and now at least 80% in the last week and a half are inquiries are around where does

my business fit into the phasing conscience the phase schedule as there are a lot of businesses that are not specifically identified in that phase schedule. our client services since the office of small business opened has seen a 77% increase from the year 2008 to 2009 to the end of the last fiscal year that ended in june of 2019. the temporary position started in the fiscal year 2018-2019 and i think our stats show that this temporary position allows the office of small businesses to serve and so, it demonstrates the need that the amount of staff that we have, that there is a demand