it closed on july 14th. we held a public hearing in june to collect comment from the public. we received comments around ten to twelve comments from the public which we're now addressing and responding to. our schedule is to have final approval by august 24th. this is a quick diagram of the

nepa process. the draft document with the environmental assessment. we have section 106 for historic preservation. park land and historic site. we're currently in this middle level where we're working with comments, a memorandum of agreement. we're drafting our final 4s evaluation. our target for final signature from cal trans is august 24th. this is low allows us to allocae our federal funds build fund dollars by the end of august. our schedule has changed a little bit as a result of covid 19. primarily advertising the first phase of construction between

fifth to eighth street to 2021. our design is continue to go that time. we implemented quick build back in january. we have a pilot project as a sidewalk level bike way. we plan to begin construction in 2021. we're assuming a two year construction duration. followed by construction of the f loop. i'm sure you all remember that market street went car free january 29th. we saw significant increase in

bicycling. in the eastbound direction market to main. turn restrictions from the side street prevented any vehicles from getting onto market other than delivery vehicle and para transit and taxis. i also wanted to update you on our funding plan. we're excited to share that we were selected as part of a accessible housing an sustainable communities grant in the amount of two point seven million dollars. it's added to the middle of this chart which you've seen before. that selection was made in june.

it will be added to the construction of the first phase between fifth and eighth street. the rest of the funding plan looks very sam similar. we've been working to fill the first phase of the gap of construction. we've also looked at other calls for projects and funding sources to help fill the gap for the full corridor. i wanted to give you an ow updae on the other changes and steps we're taking during the pandemic. our schedule is delayed about six months for fifth to eighth street. we're taking this time to reevaluate implementation of the

project to reduce impacts to businesses. we met with commissioners in march and spoke in detail about reteusing impacts to businesses. how we phase in the project. minimizing or limiting the am of sidewalk replacement which would directly impact businesses since it's in front of their entrances. looking at way to accommodate the i increase bike volume. we're looking at ways we can provide more space for bicycles. the last thing is we're also looking at designing parts of the project, getting it shovel ready for stimulus funds that

may become available in the near future. with that i'll conclude my presentation and i'm available to answer any questions. >> : thank you. are there any questions from commissioners and thank you for the meeting with myself and supervisor haney and taking seriously our concerns that will become all the more true due to covid 19. seeing no comment from commissioners let's take comment from the public. >> : chair, there is no public comment. >> : puck lick comment is now closed. thank you. good luck. and good luck getting money.

any new items? seeing none. any general comment? seeing none. >> : there is one public comment. just snuck if there. >> : got it. excellent. first speaker, please. >> : welcome caller. your two minutes begins now. okay. call has dropped unfortunately. >> : okay. should we give that will person just a second to see if they want to get back on? can you just check the line again, please. >> : yes. i'm checking. hold on one second. okay. let's try this again.

>> : go ahead speaker. >> : they have dropped out. >> : okay. we will close general public comment and this part of our meeting is adjourned and i think everybody is supposed to stay on and wait a couple of minutes and we will reconvene as the treasure island mobility agency. i do not see the chair of that body as one of our participants but i believe the vice chair is available. okay. we are adjourned.

>> : good morning and welcome to it the june 18th meeting of treasure island mobility management board. i'll be presiding over this morning's meeting. madam clerk, will you please call the roll. >> : (roll call) we have a

quorum. >> : thank you so much, madam clerk. i believe you have announcements. >> : yes, i do. public comment will be available for each item on this agenda via telephone by calling (888)204-5987. follow the system prompts. once you join, you will be able to listen to the meeting as a

participant. when you hear an item called that you wish to speak on dial ten to be added to the speaker queue. speak slowly, clearly and turn down the volume of any televisions or videos aroun radd you. >> : thank you so much. madam clerk, please call the next item on the agenda. >> : item two, chair's report. this is an information item. >> : thank you, madam clerk, i do have a statement from our chair and i will read it for the record. thank you all for convening today as the treasure island

mobility management agency. chair had to attend a meeting today. chair haney a nunsed constructioannounced theconstrur veterans. this month treasurer you're island hosted another ground breaking for the south gate realignment project. hosted by our executive director mr. chang and project lee on july 29th. the limited commencement thanks funders for collaborating on the

64 million-dollar interchange and road realignment. the south gate road realignment project took place at the job site the afternoon of july 9th. this project will provide the islands local connections be designed on and off ramps to i830 and san francisco oak land bay bridge. completely removes conflicts coming from the expansion coming to and from treasure island. this is the second project administered by the transportation authority. the westbound direction delivered in 2016 s 2016.

the next project exceed yule scr the spring of 2021. federal highway administration, cal trans, bay area toll authority, united states coast guard, and one treasure island to design, fund, and deliver infrastructure improvements. construction completion of the south gate road project is expected by the summer of 2022. the same timeframe that the overall treasure island mobility management program is scheduled to launch. as chair haney descraibe descrie over the next months. we'll consider adoption of the toll that lead towp the launch oto the launch ofthe housing co.

thank you. with that i'll ask if there's any comment from the public. >> : no public comment. >> : this is information item but i'll ask if my cloag colleas have anything to add or comment on. seeing none. i'll ask to call the next item. >> : next item is an information item. >> : thank you so much. i know with have director chang ready to report. >> : thank you vice chair and commissioners. i have a very brief to add to the update on the south gate road comenszment.

commencement. the good news is there as an additional funding grant in the amount of $30 million to continue that bicycle path. this is great. we want to congratulate tita and it's partners. this project is led by deputy director for capital projects. this will help connect the bike path along the west end of the bay bridge long west side of bridge that we're also developing. this is really great news. in addition our timma staff will

be joining our applications for federal funds. this is to help show case innovative business partnerships and technologies and practices to provide efficient affordable transportation services for people with disabilities and under served communities sm the final design and implementation of the treasure island toll and equity programs. up to $40 million is available nationwide for three phases. design, implementation, and deployment. we really want to thank the metropolitan transportation commission staff for

coordinating and allowing us to join in application and look forward to monitoring that application and hope for a successful grant. with that i can take any questions. thank you. >> : thank you. colleagues, any questions or comments on the director's report? i'm looking at the chat, i don't see any questions or comments from colleagues. with that said, is there any public comment? >> : this is no public comment. >> : thank you so much. this is an information item. madam, clerk. please call next item. >> : approve the minutes of the

may and june twebt twenty 2020 . >> : (roll call) minutes are a

approved. >> : thank you so much, madam clerk. will you please call item number five. >> : item five seeking final approval, ratify the fiscal timma policy. this is an action item. i believe you are muted, vice

chair. >> : thank you. sorry about that. this item and the next were recommended by the timma committee at our june 16th meeting and continued from the june 23 meeting due to time constraints. are there any questions from colleagues on this item? and there's no report, i believe, on this item, correct? >> : correct. gentleman since this was recommended by the timma committee we don't need a motion and a second. madam clerk, roll call, please. >> : (roll call).

>> : motion passes. an amount not to exceed one hundred thousand dollars for combined total not to exceed three hundred thousand dollars. this is an action item. >> : thank you so much, madam clerk. there is no presentation planned for this particular item. we do have rachel, our assistant

deputy director for planning who is available if there are any questions or comments. >> : colleagues do have any questions or comments for item number six? with that said, can we see if there are any members of the public who would like to speak? >> : checking. there is no public comment for this item. >> : thank you. seeing there is no public comment and this item was recommended by the timma mitt ee, we don'committee. we don't need a motion and a second. will you please call the roll. >> : (roll call) we have final

approval. >> : thank you, madam clerk. will you please call the next item. >> : item seven, introduction of new items. this is an information item. >> : thank you so much. colleagues, does anybody have any new items? seeing none on the roster. would-obviously we don't have any new items present. madam clerk please call item

number eight. >> : item eight, public comment. >> : thank you. operator, any members of the public who would like to speak on this matter at this time. >> : yes, there is public comment. >> : thank you. i would just remind speakers that you have two minutes for public comment. >> : welcome caller, your two minutes begins now. okay. let me try this again.

caller, are you on mute? your two minutes begins now. okay. vice chair, the call has dropped. there's no additional commenters. >> : thank you so much. with that said, being that there's no other business for this meeting, this meeting is adjourned. >> : thank you. >> : thank you.

>> the virus is in rainshower community. protect your family by wearing a mask. when you leave your home stay 6 feet away from other people. wash hands with soap and water and always wear a mask. it is important to protect yourself. you may be sick and not know it.

get tested if you feel sick or >> : this commission meeting iso provisions of the brown act and recent executive orders to facilitate tele conferences. ordinarily the brown act has strict rules foretell a conferencing. the governor's order has suspended those rules sm the department has met all of the applicable notice requirements. as noted on the agenda members of the public may observe this meeting via sfgovtv. they may offer public comment by calling the public comment phone number. i want to welcome members of the public and staff. we ask for your patience during these unprecedented times.

we respectfully ask the public to have patience in delays and gaps during the meeting particularly during public comment. madam secretary, would you please call the roll? >> : thank you commissioner. please say present when i call your name. (roll call) and please note that executive director is present. we have a quorum. >> : thank you. commissioners the next item is item three, communications that we'd like to provide further instructions for the public comment process. callers can dial into the toll

free number and wait for members to be announced. three minutes to provide comment on each item. during each public comment period callers will be instructed to call 18774153612. you will hear a notification when your line is unmuted. it is best to call from a quawet location and turn your television or radio down. are there any communications from the commission members?

>> : okay. hearing none. next agenda item four approving minutes from wednesday june 3 commission meeting. any comment regarding the june 3 meeting? hearing none, is there a motion to approve the wednesday june 3dos commission meeting minutes? >> : so moved. >> : moved and seconded. madam, second, please take a roll call vote to approve the commission meeting minutes. >> : (roll call) the vote is

unanimous. >> : thank you. commissioners item five is executive directors report. >> : good morning, commissioners. great to see everybody's face. i just wanted to start with the federal level actions that are taking place. following months of delay due to the pandemic, congressional appropriators kicked off the funding debates. house lawmakers are moving through the funding bills for next fiscal bills. however, regular appropriations

discussions are occur inning the background of this unprecedented legislative year. since covid 19 began congress has passed trillions of dollars in emergency funding including discretionary programs normally funded through the discretionary cycle. more than one billion for the older americans act programs to respond to increased need ses. s. additional measures and changes to address the growing economic changes and disasters. we have benefited from the money coming out of the federal government so far and are very much advocating for more dollars. advocating through c 4a the

california area of aging and the national association of aging. i know that members of our advisory council and some of you have advocated for those dollars as well. that's something that we're really going to need in the next year. despite the continued need for emergency funding, lawmakers are advancing the annual fund proposals for all discretionary programs. this has just been a really complicated process. the debates were ultimately insufficient and the restricted budget caps that were established before the pandemic really caused a lot of confusion and problems with getting money out the door. now congressional appropriators have little legal room to conduct adjustments in the

spending bill. this is an on going budget. a lot of the money that is coming down is through emergency processes that they are working on. hopefully we will find out in the very near future if we're getting an infusion of cash for nutritious and supportive services for caregivers but we don't know yet. there's just a lot of influx at the federal level. as we get information about with a we can advocate for we'll get that information out to you so that either you can decide as a commission or as individuals that you want to help advocate for these dollars to come out. at the state level, the state department of aging is coming out of with guidelines on reopening for organizations that serve over people with

disabilities, they are saying that they think they shouldn't fully open up until stage four which is when arenas will open up and concerts and things like that and sports events. the reason they are saying that is the california department of public health is maintaining that older adults are really at risk for covid 19 and given the surge that we're in right now they are concerned about saying anything more than that. that said, they did build in some flexibility so that local triple as can figure out how to handle some of these issue with their providers. when talking with the state i like to give the example of career center which is open right now and is open right now because they feel they are serving such an at risk population, that population is more at risk if they are not

open for them to come in and charge phones and get food and things like that. i'm glad for the flexibility and we'll continue to work with our providers in the community to figure out what works best. also at the state level there is a focus now on equity and aging. at the state level they have that echoed. the director of department of aging realized there was a lot happening with covid 19 and older adults are most likely to die from it. there were some strange decisions made around crisis care and things like that. the voices of older adults have gotten lost in a lot of the conversations. they are kicking off a series of

anti age conversations and the state director of aging asked me and commissioner spears and kelly and kate-kelly with the ihss authority and kate with the community campaign. we had planned to present at the american society on aging on the very same issues. they asked us to present to them and a wider audience on some of the work we've done. how agism is particularly prevalent during covid 19. like we've talked a lot about in san francisco. it's great we're going to be part of that kick off but it's a year long process, we'll have different ways to engage with that process. in addition to that, they are

really looking at digital divide issues and social engagement. we're engaged with google to obtain a number of devices that i think there are echos that can go into the homes of older adults and help people engage with technology and other community using those devices. now the california association areas on aging is working-what the best way to get those out into communities. having a pilot to really learn how we can bridge the digital divide. maybe showing that into something bigger which is a partnership with more corporations and, you know, really addressing the digital divide knowing people are going to be at home at least for the

near future. the other thing that's happening at the state level is the california department-sorry. i have all the acronym ns in my head. the state is thinking of proposing a new benefit, a new medical benefit called long term care at home which will help people who need home care, skilled nursing care remain in community. a lot of people working on what this will look like. it will be an actual benefit. it will keep people from going into nursing homes and get the same services are home. make a way for people to come out of nursing homes and do it safely. there's been a number of people come out of nursing homes because their family is worried about them. the death rates in nursing homes

and close to 50% of people who died in california as a result of covid 19 have died in nursing homes. this is a way of having people come out and live in community with whatever supports they have and added supports from this program so that it's safe. what's been happening is people have brought their family members out and they don't have alllet services and infrastructure at home. it's pretty exciting on one hand. there are a lot of other programs that the state already has that they can build upon. there are a lot of questions from the community about what it all means and who will qualify for it and all of that. i'm involved in some of those conversations. cindy has been really helpful with that. she has a lot of knowledge around programs at home like this. we will continue to have san

francisco's voice heard as that unfolds. locally, the emergency operations center, i think most of you know i was working there for a number of months with the feeding unit. the emergency operations center for san francisco has gone to a unified command for a covid 19 response. they have-essentially what's functioning is a new department called the covid 19 command center. everything covid 19 related is run out of that center. it's still right now, at the center. a number of staff has been offered up from various departments to staff that department and we're expecting that those staff deployments will be six months to a year while in the process to

continuing to respond and moving into full recovery. that's been really interesting to see that develop and build. some of the major things we're involved with still are continuing to ensure that people who are continuing to care due to covid 19 continue to get food and on the human side also includes our in home sup rtive e services program. people who are continuing to shelter in place in hotels until there's a recovery plan for them and move back out into the community. that's what that looks like. we're very fortunate and grateful that we have some staff that stepped up to continue that work and who would be deployed at the covid 19 command center for the next six months or so.

the next thing is the great plates program. you've heard me talk about and hopefully heard about in the community. the governor's plan to invest in restaurants but also to get meals out to older adults was extended to august 9th. that program is serving over two thousand people at this point and that's really impressive if we look at the other counties in california including la county, we're doing really well. i think we're the most aggressive in terms of getting people on that program in the county and state. based on the size of our population. that's exciting. we are working with the mayor's office on disability and providing in place. it's with the ihss public

authority to distribute personal protective equipment to the community starting next week. that's been a really big effort. it's been a really great partnership with the mayor's office and department of disability. one of the things through the covid 19 response i've noticed the departments have worked closely together to provide the best access and we're thinking about how to breakdown silos and this is one way we've done that. moving on we're pleased that we added our new county veterans service office manager to the dos management team. he has a great history. he came out of the army. has done a lot of work with hud

and other programs, he is knowledgeable about community needs and veterans and specifically he has really great leadership skills. we were hoping that the board of supervisors would appoint him as a county veteran service officer. that process is a little bit kn fusing becausconfusing because t under the city administrators office back in the day, in the year 2000. a number of other offices came under, we never changed the local legislation around how appointment gets made. what happens is still the city administrator makes a recommendation to the board of supers. we're going through that process

right now working closely with the city administrators office and the board. we're hoping very much that he will be the appointee from the board. that the county veterans service office manager and the kowpty cy veterans service officer will be one in the same person. from a policy point of view, the board of supervisors will agree to that sm we'r. we're working to comply with the governor's executive order which requires ihss to start conducting initial home visits starting august. we do this virtually when we can. it's very clear from the governor's office that he would like us to begin going out and seeing people in person. we're working to make sure people are tested for all the equipment they need and they are

ready to go in august. we're also working to bring our field based social workers into compliance with the new protective equipment guidance from the department of human resources and work with testing approximately one hundred field based social workerred within the next three to four weeks. there's a lot going on. it's been really interesting to come out of the eo c and begin working remotely and try to make sure that we're continuing to have some sort of continuity with our staff and that we're having somewhere that we're communing in the ways that we did before. it definitely feels different. for me-it's probably hard on all of us. got very used to seeing staff in the elevators and lunch room and office, i do a lot of my work

that way and engage with people that way. it's difficult getting used to this very different way as the department head. i'm proud of our management team, all of our staff because people are just continuing to find new way it work together and communicate and to coordinate. i assume that we will continue to do that at the highest level possible as we move through this process over the next year or so. that is it for my report, i'm happy to answery questions that you may have. >> : no. thank you so much for that extensive and exhaustive report. i think that the commissioners are begin so grateful for the work that you are doing and the staff. i want to make sure that we're expressing that. especially doing that right now.

my response to your report, i just know that you are all working triple what you usually have been. you are all essential. making a huge difference in our population of san francisco. thank you very much. i think when you mentioned our helping in any way, we do get information from staff on how to advocate and what to sa advocate for. please continue sending us that. the net works that we have, we'll definitely deploy and provide as much assistance as we can. any other comments or questions from the other commissioners? commissioner wong. >> : thank you. good morning. we appreciate the work that you are doing under such difficult

circumstances. you mentioned that the county service officer appointment or recommendation has been sent to the board of supervisors. is the appointment process under the purview of das or are we just a partner of? >> : it's interesting because the office that's with us-the responsibility for running the office. the county veteran's service office itself. the appointment of the county veteran's officer actually sits with the board of supervisors. for a number of years-i have been with the department for 17 years next week. when i got here the officer actually wasn't part of the

office, he actually was an employee of the city attorney's office. when he retired one of the things we talked to the city administrator and the board about was how nice it would be is if the office and officer were actually together. that's what we've been working to do. it also is a fact that the money for the manager position sits with das. if they wanted somebody else to be appointed they would have to figure out a way to pay for that person. it's a little confusing. one of the things we need to do is fix the legislation. the city administrators office would like to be out of this because they don't really work with this office anymore. the office no longer sits under the city administrators office.

we just never clean up that legislation. we can't do it immediately. we'll be doing it hopefully in the next year, next few months. it's a little confusing commissioner. it's one of those city things that just hasn't gotten fixed yet and it's not very clear. >> : i appreciate the answer. i just wanted to let you know within the veteran community for veteran affairs commission here in san francisco has registered a complien complaint that no ven organization has been considered for this process. and again, i just wanted to get clarification as to how this-how the hiring process actually

works. i'm being asked questions within the american legion as to why is it they were never consulted. not to say that the gentlemen being recommended is not qualified or anything like that. there was no consultation whatsoever. >> : what has happened so far is that our hiring process is a process where we have to go through same civil service guideline that's we would normally go through for any hire. we are certainly kog distan cogf that to have somebody on the hiring panel. i think what's confusing is that the appointment process is separate. that hasn't happened yet. there actually is room for people to register any sort of feelings they have for the appointee who come frs from the

city administrator's office to the board. the board is where the appointee process happens. the way the legislation is written is that the city administrator comes up with somebody, they don't necessarily-the process isn't negatively that they go to the community first. they put the recommended person out to the board. there's time for public comment and engagement for the board. that's where that happens. not that it couldn't be changed but that's the way it's always been for this particular appointment and any board appointment. so when the board puts it forth at the rules committee, that's the time that the veterans organization's can come and say we like this person for this position or we think there should be somebody else. that's the time when the community can do that. that will be counted very soon, i believe.

that's what i hear. >> : thank you. >> : does that make sense? it's confusing. he hasn't been appointed yet. there's still room for public engagement. >> : commissioner spears. >> : i just wanted to add my thanks to the department chair and the department staff for all of the work that's been done for the community over in this very complicated and depressing times that we live in right now. especially around the food service, i know how important that is for so many people in the community and to hear that great plates have been extended,

that's great news. hopefully it will be extended again. i just wanted to it thank you all for your diligent work in serving the most vulnerable here in san francisco. >> : okay. thank you. commissioner-did you have any comments or questions for the director? >> : yeah. again, huge compliments. i'm curious as to staffing? are you able to keep up and keep everybody at work? how is that working out? >> : yes. we are. we definitely need all the staff we have. one of the things we know is that older adults and people with disabilities have been disproportionately affected by this. it's a very different working world for sure. one of the things they didn't go

into detail about, we met last month. we know we're facing a very big budget deficit at the local level. we're being asked to come up with some target reductions and at the same time we know we're going to need all the dollars we have. we're working through what that looks like. the mayor said last week that she's going to need departments to give up a little bit more. we don't have any idea what those numbers are or even what it will look like for our particular agency because we have so many federal and state dollars flowing through hsa that we're effected differently from some of the other departments. we're in a better position to retain our staff and to really-and to continue to serve growing numbers of people who

need things like food and home care and things like that. it's a little bit more-it's actually hard for me to get my head around what the budget looks like this year because there's so many moving parts and state and federal revenues. there's such a big receive sit at the federal level. next time we meet we'll have a clearer picture going into the next fiscal year. that will impact, of course, our staffing potential-it will impact our staffing mostly in the way that it will be hard for us to hire people when we have vacancies. we need everyone we have. we have figured out how to work remotely to the extent we can. we have to prioritize some of the work we're doing.

those will be tough questions. we've been riding a high for a number of years. community funds coming in. the dignity fund legislation and growth and dignity fund. the growth fund for other programs has been pretty amazing. it's been doing some exciting new things. we have to goin go back to our e values that we crafted pretty carefully. how will we measure up with everything we're thinking about doing. what do we prioritize? how do we keep staff in the smartest way possible? >> : it's been amazing. you've done a fabulous job. if any of us need to advocate for you in terms of jobs and the budget, please keep us informed. and thank you.

>> : thanks, commissioner. >> : thank you commissioners. having heard from all of the commissioners i'm going to move along to item number six which is the advisory council report. >> : good morning, commissioners. it's nice to see all of you and speak you with you again. we met on june 19th. we hadn't met since february so we were excited to get back together. we had a very thorough engaged update much like she did this morning. the department has been doing and council members were able to ask questions and the advantage

of the presentation. our plans as many others have been thrown-where to go from here sm th. the critical issue on the agenda this month is the area plan. it was the final presentation. in february of the last meeting we had, they presented the initial draft. advisory council had a couple of recommendations. incorporated those along with some changes, the advisory council unanimously approved the area plan. we're just waiting to sign off on it it. we also had some dignity funds

updates, we'll follow-up on that at our next meeting next week. we also got caught up on our site visits. we had site visits on five locations. we're really pleased about three of the five veteran sites. there had been some concerns about the-some of the veteran services. we had a lively conversation about that. council member rock land who had done these site visits put together a summary.

that's going to be given to michael to take back with his team to take a look at it. at our meeting next week we'll take a look at how do we do site visits going forward. obviously there aren't sites specifically to visits. we may be looking at getting the virtual programming that's being offered into some of the meal programs, we're going to have a lively discussion i'm sure about that. we're still looking to have an update on the commission on aging as she is a member. on the california master plan of which she is one of the advisors on the alzheimer's group. everything is focused on the budget. the budget is in the air. she did the historic supreme

court decision that prohibited discrimination against the lgbtq community. there's a lot of concern locally and at the state level. no one is collecting gender and orientation data unless it relates to covid 19 pandemic. the membership community-the appointment of i think three or four of us are up for reappointment and the advisory appointment. we have things moving and obviously due to the pandemic and shelter in place some of those were put on the back burner but we're continuing to work there. the council has discussed further next week supporting the black lives matter and the n4a

is looking to get support amongst u.s. senators to focus on relations. i've heard from the board out side of the aging and disability community but from the medical community about social isolation and concerns there. the advisory committee meetin meeting-september provide an update on legislation. are there any questions? >> : thank you so much, diane. we appreciate all the work into making sure we have that initial meeting and how important it was to pass that area plan. i thank you for making sure that happened. any other comenlts o other comms

for commissioners? i. >> : i really want to thank michael and rose. we met last fall and planned how we were going to handle this. when we came to february, we were ready to go. their team was ready to go with the report and that really put us ahead of the game when things were shut down. i just want to compliment that team. we hope that we can continue that collaboration moving forward. it made the approval process so much easier. job well done. >> : great to hear that. great to know that we got all of that input that is so important to having a good report. please extend our thanks to the advisory committee for all the work they did.

any other comments or questions from the commissioners? i think we will good to item gom seven. >> : item seven is public comment for items that are not on today's calendar. please open the phone lines for the public. you may be dialed into to. in order to provide public comment. please press pound two. if you have not yet dialed in, please call 17663695200.

once in the conference please press pound two to enter the question two. you will hear the notification when your line is unmuted. we'll unmute you from the question queut. it's besqueue.please turn up thn your phone. please turn off the volume on your television or radio. we will wait thirty seconds for callers. >> : hello. this is jessica from senior disability action. i'm sure none of you are surprised to hear my voice. it's nice to see you online. thank you for all your work that everyone is doing during this hard time. i wanted to comment on a couple things. there has been a lot of concern about care rationing.

if hospitals get full and don't have enough beds or ventilators who gets treated. sidgesince the beginning of the pandemic seniors would be the last. with this new surge it sounds like the area hospitals are starting to fill up. there's some concern about that. we're trying to organize to-we have a california care rationing coalition and connect with different hospital systems about making sure that our lives are valued and protected. if you'd like to get involved you can e-mail me if you are interested. on the nursing home issue that director mentioned about the concern about so many people that are getting sick and dying in nursing homes and assisted

living facilities, we're doing a gathering for residents of care facilities who are isolated right now to join by video. just a chance for people to talk to each other and share their experiences. that's this thursday july 16th from three to four. i sent the information to you. hopefully you can share that with people you know who may be interest. lastly, one of the things we're trying to do during the pandemic to reduce isolation and honor-i don't know if it was mentioned. we're celebrating the 30th anniversary of the americans with disabilities ability. it's harder to do during pandemic times. book theories.

it's an on going thing. we have four different book readings coming up in the next couple months. the book the pretty one. you don't have to have read the book. i hope we can connect in that way and i know that the office of disabilities is going to put other events on their website. i hope to seech oach other on >> : you have no callers remaining.

>> : the next item is item eight. old business. please raise your hand if there is any old business that you would like to discuss. seeing none i'll call the next item. item number nine, at this time the commission will elect the president and vice president. i will-is there a motion to discuss? >> : so moved. >> : second. >> : i will now call a roll call vote. (roll call).

>> : so moved. >> : second. i will now call a roll call vote. (roll call) the vote is unanimous. the next agenda item are action

items that require a vote by the commission. >> : if i could just take a moment before we start our real work here. thank you so much for everyone's support and it's an absolute honor for me to be with this commission. a little odd doing this from my dining room table. i'm very very happy and pleased and know that i am very active from my dining room table. whatever i can do to help the staff and other commissioners, i do. i am very very happy to be serving along with vice president janet spears. so welcoming and look forward to working with you even if it's through phone and zoom calls. i think we'll be good partners together. i'm very very happy to work with all of you commissioners very

qualified commissioners and very pleased to work with you as we gain more commissioners which i'm looking forward to. i think we're going to be a great team. again, in these unprecedented times committed to these communities that we serve especially now knowing how important it is. i look forward to all of that. we'll work very hard from my apartment for all of that until i'm final able to work together with you physically. i don't know if vice president spears wanted to say anything at this time or go ahead with the agenda.

between the allocation of last year and this year. programs with area plan money include the court of services, home delivered nutrition, disease prevention, family caregiver support programs, elder abuse prevention as well as administration for these programs. the supportive service budget includes meal services, transportation, information and

referral and emergency short-term home care. please note that local funds supporting these programs are not included in this table. as mentioned in the commission memo, increased funding for 20-21 is largely attributable to state funding in congregate nutrition, home delivered meals and the ombudsman program. the contract, 2021-60 details the various requirements tied to funding. the approval of this item, staff may make contract modifications as needed. please let me know if you have any questions. thank you. >> thank you. i do not have any questions at this time because we have gone through this before and i think we asked questions at that point, but now that we've seen it again, and it's time for the final decision, of course, are

there any comments of questions from the other commissioners? anything additional? hearing none, commissioner any questions. >> commissioner sklar: no. >> great. madame secretary, anybody from the public who wishes to comment? >> secretary: moderator, please open the phone line for public comment. those who wish to provide public comment under this item press pound 2 to enter the question queue. do we have any callers in the queue? >> announcer: there are currently no callers in the queue. >> commissioner knutzen: hearing none, no request to speak on the item, we'll close public comment. is there a motion?

to pass the area plan 2021-2024? >> you mean the budget? >> commissioner knutzen: yes, i'm sorry, the budget. i saw a motion from commissioner spears -- vice president spears, yes? >> commissioner spears: yes. >> commissioner knutzen: and a second from commissioner lum. thank you. can you please take a roll call vote on agenda a. >> president knutzen, how do you vote? >> yes. >> spears, yes. >> commissioner lum: yes. >> commissioner sklar: yes. >> secretary: the vote is unanimous. >> commissioner knutzen: okay, great, thank you. commissioners, the next item is item b, review and approval of the fiscal year 2021-2024 area

plan for the california department of aging. and i think we'll have from our staff, rose johns and our director shireen mcspadden speak to this along with a slide, so please carry on. >> thank you. good morning, commissioners. can you hear me? >> commissioner knutzen: yes. >> my name is rose johns, i'm planning analyst with the human services agency. i'm here before you today to present the area plan 2021-2024 for approval with director mcspadden. and we have a simple agenda for this presentation. we're going to highlight updates we've made to the area plan. you may recall that we came and presented more extensively to you a review of the plan before covid came to us. and then we'll open it up for

any discussion that you have. one of the most notable and interesting updates to the plan is a letter that we've added from director mcspadden that acknowledges the current context that we're in. and i believe that director mcspadden is going to take a moment to read this letter to you now. >> yeah, thanks, rose. it was rose's idea to add this letter talking about the current context that we're in. and so i'll just quickly read it. dear friends and colleagues, this area plan was completed in the early months of 2020. with the on set of coronavirus, our national state landscapes have been upended. government and community sprang into action in response to this crisis. together we're working to re-imagine and restructure our services and meet new and existing needs of older people

and people with disabilities and to do so safely in compliance with public health and social distancing guidelines. our department is charged with coordinated responsive network of aging disability services is all the more important. at this time conditions continue to evolve and the state budget is not finalized. this plan represents our aspirations for a cohesive network but meets the need of the population. in this current state of flux we recognize these plans may need be to adjusted as we transition from a new state of emergency to the new normal. i'm thankful for the flexibility of the staff and partners. i'm proud of the work we've done together and i'm looking forward to supporting our older community members. thank you.

>> thank you. so what this letter is communicating, well, everything that you just heard. one thing i want to highlight for you is that while the california department of aging extended a deadline for this plan, it typically is due may 1st. that extension, i believe, was really just to reflect that most of our realities were completely overturned and that staff working on the area plan and advisory bodies and governing bodies such as yourself were likely unable to meet as scheduled. and so the california department of aging did not add new requests or ask us to restructure the plan at this time. and so i'm going to now highlight the key updates that we've made to the plan and you'll see we haven't deviateded or made too many revisions to

what we did previously. section 7 is where we summarize public hearings. that includes our presentation at the advisory council and before the commission. we noted in section 7, there were four topics brought up and discussed. the definition of disability was an item at the advisory council. discussion of who is eligible for d.a.s. services under the umbrella of disability. and we also discussed senior homelessness and how d.a.s. works to support older adults who are unhoused. we also spent time talking about assisted-living facilities and residents and their eligibility to participate in d.a.s. services. essentially, as long as it's not a duplication of support that a resident is receiving those riding in assisted-living facilities are able to participate in d.a.s. services. and then there was discussion

about racial equity and how d.a.s. approaches this and how d.a.s.'s efforts align with the mayor's directives. we also updated two of our narrative objectives in section 9 which is the golden objection section. we updated the existing item, 1-c, about nutrition because we wanted to acknowledge in the coming years over the time period covered by this plan, that d.a.s. will be working with the providers to ensure the continuity of existing services. and to support providers to adapt their service models to safely provide them within this covid-19 context. we also added a new objective which is our covid-19 response objective and in this, the department outlines that it will be supporting consumers to meet

their needs safely during the coronavirus emergency and recovery. so in coordination with the city's emergency response, d.a.s. will provide adapted, enhanced and new resources to support older and disabled adults in meeting their needs safely during the immediate pandemic response and long-term recovery, we'll ensure services are accessible and tailored to meet the needs of the community members. and all new refers to that, this is an entire new objective, because we couldn't conceptize this while working on the goals and objectives earlier this year. then we also updated section 12, the d.a.s. preparedness to add some content about the department's role and response in responding to covid-19. where we note that d.a.s. has driven the development of new resources and systems in key

areas, including food security, home care, social engagement and other critical needs that older adults and adults with disabilities have. that is maintaining these efforts and remain vigilant and responsive as our experience with this virus and public health crisis will likely fluctuate. and with that, happy to open it up to discussion and answer any questions that you have. >> commissioner knutzen: thank you so much for all the additional work and incorporating all the feedback you got. so thank you to both of you. are there any comments or questions from the commission? all right. vice president spears? >> commissioner spears: i just wanted to say that i really appreciated the thoroughness of the report. i had an opportunity to read the

entire thing and it really sets the course for what we're up to over the next several years and i found it quite easy to follow. and kudos to the team who put it together because i thought it was a fabulous report. >> commissioner knutzen: all right. any other commissioner comments? sklar? >> commissioner sklar: no. >> commissioner knutzen: can you open the phone line for public comment, or do we have anybody who wishes the comment? >> secretary: members of the public that wish to provide comment -- [inaudible] -- to the question -- do we have any callers in the queue?

>> i'm not showing any callers at this time. >> secretary: thank you. >> commissioner knutzen: okay, great. hearing no request to speak on the item, we close public comment. is there a motion to approve the area plan 2021, commissioners? all right, i see moved by commissioner lum and second by vice president spears. madame secretary, will you please take the roll on agenda item b? >> commissioner knutzen: yes. >> commissioner spears: yes. >> commissioner lum: yes.

>> commissioner sklar: yes. >> secretary: the vote is unanimous. >> commissioner knutzen: okay, thank you. commissioners, your next item is agenda c. that is requesting authorization to modify the economisting grant agreement with the self help for the elderly for the provision of elder nutrition program, e.n.p., congregate meals during the period of july 1, 2019 through june 30, 2020 in the additional amount of $1,333,669, plus a 10% contingency for revised total modification amount not to exceed $1,945,121. staff tiffany kearny will present the item. >> thank you, can you hear me? >> commissioner knutzen: yes. >> my name is tiffany kearny, i

am the program analyst and lead nutritionist for d.a.s. and i'm here today to present the modification for self-help congregate meal grant. providers have experienced a significant demand in meal services and had to modify how they provide meals. they have been steadfast in meeting the increased demand and in changing their food service operations to ensure the health and safety of clients and staff. all have transitioned their programs to meals to go, meal delivery or both. early on, self-help for the elderly recognized the need to deliver meals to their clients who relied on them as a primary source for daily nutrition and shifted their program to meal

delivery shortly after the city's shelter-in-place order. staff and volunteers delivered average of 100,000 meals per month, serving around 3500 clients a week starting in april through june, which is five times their monthly average before covid. self-help served about 453,000 congregate meals in 19-20 and the requested funding help covered the cost of 176,000 of those meals. thank you and i'm happy to answer any questions you may have at this time. >> commissioner knutzen: yes, i just can't fail to notice, begin the comments, this is such a huge increase in what they anticipated doing which was in the tens of thousands of meals

to over 100,000 meals. if i have that correctly? reading this document. and i think nothing -- nothing shows more [laughter] what's happened to us other than reading this request. i didn't have a question, but i think i needed to note that. it was quite a thing to even read. is there any other comments or questions from commissioners before we vote? yes, commissioner lum? >> commissioner lum: thank you. my question, really, is to get a clarification for myself. normally, a budget -- it's requested and we approve the budget for whatever the request was. in this case, needless to say, there is this tremendous

increase. is it understood that these organizations can always increase the budget? and then come back and ask us to fund it later? or, you know -- what i really want to know is if there is this implied approval ahead of time? >> are you going to answer that? >> yeah, so i'll answer it. thanks, tiffany. so this is an unprecedented time and one of the things that we did know was that we would have increased need for nutrition services and increased need for people to get home-delivered meals. one of the things that i've been doing is working closely with the c.e.o.s of the organizations that we work with to try to understand what their increased needs are. and to try to help our staff be prepared to respond to those

needs. fortunately, we did get dollars from the federal government in the two stimulus packages that we got to help offset the general fund cost of these, but the city, i think, is just aware that we have increased food insecurity due to covid-19 and the city is prepared to make sure that we're figuring out how to answer those -- answer that need. it's complicated because, you know, we don't always have new monies coming in. we were able to shift some dollars over from dignity fund to help cover this. we were able to get the federal dollars, et cetera, but it's just an ongoing conversation. i don't think we can ultimately say up front we're going to be able to meet all the needs and yet we know that we need to try to the extent that we can because food insecurity is such

an awful thing for the population that we serve. does that answer your question, commissioner? >> commissioner lum: yes, it does. you know, just being new, it seems very difficult for us to approve a budget not knowing whether or not that budget is going to be sufficient and then obviously, where are we going to get the additional money? >> right. it's an ongoing concern. fortunately, budgets are a planning tool and when we try to adhere to them as much as we can, but we really are -- we have to work within that budget and then we're also very hopeful there will be other dollars come in and help us increase to continue the increased service level that we have right now. >> commissioner lum: thank you. >> thanks.

>> commissioner knutzen: thank you. commissioner sklar, any questions? >> commissioner sklar: no. >> commissioner knutzen: anyone from the public who wishes to comment on the item? >> secretary: moderator, please open the phone lines for public comment. members who wish to provide public comment press pound 2 to enter the question queue. do we have callers in the queue? >> yes, we do. >> yes, commissioners. hello? >> hello, caller, can you give us a name? >> annie chung. and i'm the c.e.o. of self-help for the elderly and i would like to comment. >> great, your three minutes begin now. >> thank you, bridgett.

commissioners, good morning. this is annie with self-help for the elderly. thank you very, very much for questions, commissioner lum, as well as for director mcspadden and tiffany for recommended this very huge amount to kind of fill the gap that self-help for the elderly has provided as the commissioner said, almost 300,000 meals during the covid months from march to end of june. it is really unexpected, but as we close all of our nine and ten congregate sites, we realize that those are 1500 elderly that normally come to our senior centers who immediately have the need to go on to home delivery. so we worked with our cater and our staff to make it possible so that no senior go hungry.

i want to thank shireen and her staff. we worked actually very closely together since the shelter-in-place. so as the number increased, we cannot really stop because the elderly were calling us in panic mode. they couldn't go out of the building. many lived in s.r.o.s and senior buildings and we don't really want them to go out and get sick. so in hindsight, we really have to continue feeding our seniors as much as we can so that we keep them safe at home. it's kind of like a leap of faith. and at the end of june, when we have to close down the covid-19 meal delivery, we open six of our congregate sites for to-go meals and we also refer about 500 of the assisting seniors to the greater plates program. we're continuing monitoring our seniors' health and for those

very, very frail and disabled seniors who are still going to bring a hot meal home delivery style to them, but not to the extent of closure, about 4,000 meals during the day during the peak. we were happy to have a lot of volunteers help us. we had over 350 volunteer drivers that came from the neighborhood. we were delivering all over san francisco. and many of them, really, live in senior housing and s.r.o.s and in the western part of the city. and we give a big thank you to all our volunteers, director mcspadden was present to help us honor a number of these neighborhood groups. sfpd offices have helped us, the lyft drivers and the community initiatives have consistently sent volunteers to help us. so i would like the commission to support this budget

modification so that our budget is kept whole and we will continue to try our best to meet the needs of our seniors during this pandemic. winston churchill said it is no use saying we're trying to our best, we just need to succeed doing what is necessary. during the covid months we did what was necessary to keep our seniors safe and we couldn't have done it without all of your support. and particularly yours, shireen. you've kept me kind of sane during our conversations, working out options and really the best support for our seniors. tiffany, shireen, cindy, michael, thank you very much on behalf of all the seniors. >> secretary: thank you.

>> there are no other callers at this time. >> secretary: thank you. >> commissioner knutzen: can i just compliment self-help for the elderly for years of being at the front line and helping when help is needed. annie does a great job and totally in support of all they're doing. thank you. >> great, thank you. hearing no other requests to speak from the public, we will close public comment and i'd like to ask the commissioners for a motion? >> commissioner knutzen: so moved. >> looks like one from commissioner sklar and then a second from commissioner lum. yes, thank you.

>> commissioner knutzen: yes. >> commissioner spears: yes. >> commissioner lum: yes. >> commissioner sklar: yes. the vote is unanimous. >> commissioner knutzen: thank you very much. commissioner, your next item is agenda d, requesting authorization to enter into a new grant are agreement with swords to plow shares for provision of legal assistance for veterans with mental health claims. during the period of july 1, 2020 through june 30, 2020 in the amount of 236,060, plus a 10% contingency not to exceed 259666. staff well present the item. >> good morning, president

knutzen, fellow commissioners and executive director mcspadden. i'm the benefits and director of d.a.s. the item before you is to provide legal assistance for veterans with mental health claims. the san francisco office was awarded this funding in partnership with swords to employee shares by the department of veterans affairs. we've partnered to streamline service coordination and expand the ability of legal assistance for veterans across san francisco. swords to employee shares provides legal counseling up to full representation by an attorney to underserved veterans of complex v.a. mental health disability claims. these veterans are often not receiving the benefits which they are entitled due to barriers. in this grant, the department of veterans affairs requires that

the program target underserved veterans. they're considered those that are other than honorably discharged, lgbtq, women, students. san francisco county veteran service will collaborate with swords to employee shares to provide formal and informal outreach to veterans. outreach will focus on low-income and homeless veterans with mental health disabilities who reside in san francisco. compared nationally, san francisco has the eighth highest number of homeless veterans and third highest rate of unsheltered veterans. during the in-kind count of homeless individuals, we discovered there were 608 homeless veterans and 81% of them are unsheltered. this provides outreach to the vet center and other locations

where underserved veterans seek support. they'll pilot legal clinics at the college of san francisco to reach out to the transitioning student veterans and the san francisco veterans county office will reach out to veterans sheltering in place. it's anticipated that this grant will have a dramatic impact by ensuring that more underserved veterans with mental health abilities will increase their access to v.a. mental health and health care. they will seek out and qualify for housing assistance to support their reintegration to civilian life. i also request your approval for this contract. i'm happy to answer any questions the commission may have. thank you. >> any questions or comments from the commissioners? on this request?

then hearing -- >> commissioner sklar: no, i don't. >> commissioner knutzen: i wanted to show -- i know from my advocacy in the lgbtq community, how complicated it is when you are dishonorably discharged to get benefits. so this is the trickiest legal work that can be done to try to get people who are challenged assistance to prove that they do deserve these benefits. so i just wanted to acknowledge that and i know how complicated that kind of case is. and so, anyway, hearing no other requests for the commission to speak, so -- do we have any public comment? >> secretary: moderator, please open the phone lines for public

comment. members of the public that have dialled in and wish to provide public comment under this item, please press pound 2 to enter the question queue. any callers in the queue? >> i am not showing any callers at this time. >> commissioner knutzen: hearing no request to speak on the item, we will close public comment. motion to approve? commissioner lum. second from vice president spears. madame secretary, please take a roll call vote for agenda item d. >> how do you vote? >> commissioner knutzen: yes. >> commissioner spears: yes. >> commissioner lum: yes. >> commissioner sklar: yes. >> secretary: president, the vote is unanimous. >> commissioner knutzen: great. thank you so much.

commissioners, your next item is e, reway and approval of california department of aging health insurance counseling and advocacy program, hicap, contract hi-2021-06, the associated budget and all subsequent amendments. i think we're going to hear from staff member michael zaugg who is ready to present. >> good morning, commissioners. executive director mcfadden. again, yes, this items seeks your approval as part of the completion of the certification process. approval of this contract allows us to receive funding that we use for the operation of our health insurance counseling and advocacy program, or as it's commonly known, the hicap. the hicap is a medicare focused program providing community, education, one to one tt

counseling and advocacy services for folks who are medicare beneficiaries or eligible for medicare. we actually take the funds in through a separate contracting process and contract out with self-help for the elderly, who administer the program in the community. while it's not central to this item, i would be remiss not to do a quick report on how the hicap has fared through all these changes. they've done quite well, actually. you know when the shelter-in-place went into effect, hicap halted operations and then kind of watched to see how things were evolving. their program does not do a lot of walkup services, a lot of the services are driven through a 1-800 number or online avenues in order to schedule appointments, which usually do take place in the community, one

to one. so many of these appointments were primarily moved to phone appointments with some web one to one counseling sessions as well. when i look at the statistics, they're pretty impressive. in 18-19, two years ago, this program -- the non-covid year i guess, this program served over 2000 -- provided counseling to 2000 clients. when i look at the stats for this year, they're on pace to get close to that again. as of this moment they've provided services to about 1887 clients with -- i know that they have a couple more files to go to finalize. so i think they're going to get another 100 added onto that number for the fiscal year 19-20, the fiscal year we just completed. the last thing i would note on this item providing a little bit of context.

the dollar amount here in this contract, essentially keeps the hicap program funded at its previous year's funding level for the year ahead of us. so with that, i'm happy to answer any questions that the commissioners may have. >> commissioner knutzen: thank you very much, mr. zaugg. and that was precisely my question, how are they adapting to the current times, but it sounds like they've adapted quickly. >> yeah. >> commissioner knutzen: and successfully. that's good. i know that everybody has a question as they go on medicare. >> sure. >> commissioner knutzen: the program has been accessed by many, many of my friends and i've heard about it a lot, so i know it's very useful. are there any other comments or questions from the other commissioners? okay.

then -- could we please -- do we have anyone from the public who wishes to comment on this item? >> secretary: moderator, please open the line for public comment. members of the public that have dialled in to provide public comment under this item, please press pound 2 to enter the question queue. do we have any callers in the queue? >> i'm not showing any callers at this time. >> commissioner knutzen: okay, hearing no requests to speak on the item, we close public comment. is there a motion to pass this item? commissioners? do we have a motion from commissioners? >> so moved. >> thank you, from vice president spears. a second? >> commissioner knutzen: second from commissioner sklar. madame secretary, please take

the roll call. >> secretary: how do you vote? >> commissioner knutzen: yes. >> commissioner spears: yes. >> commissioner lum: yes. >> commissioner sklar: yes. the vote is unanimous. >> commissioner knutzen: great, thank you very much. commissioners, your next agenda item is f, it is review and approval of california department of aging, dignity at home fall prevention contract fp1920-06 associated budget and all subsequent amendments. again, staff person, michael zaugg, will present. mr. zaugg? >> hello again, commissioners. this item similar to the one before is another approval of a contract between the california department of aging and the department of disability and aging services. this is to access new funding

for a new program type. the state has allocated funding in last year's budget for fall prevention programs. it got off to a rocky start as it was launched just as covid hit, so it has been a little bit bringing this to commission for execution. with your approval, we are hoping to actually use these funds to partner with an existing program in the city's department of public health. that is their community and home injury prevention program for seniors. the acronym is chip. what we're trying to accomplish there is to link in our network of providers and our network of clients with the department of public health and look at where they're able to serve and where they might not already be reaching and see if we can bring more clients into the program

for -- for services. we're going to work with the current program to explore the in-home assessment process and seek evolving and innovative ways to continue that program function in the new shelters in place and public health order world. then i think the big thing that is going to happen here is there is a great demand within their program for home modifications and purchase of equipment in order to approve the safety of people at home. the funding there runs out usually by the third quarter of each fiscal year, so we think bringing this additional funding would help serve more clients as well as be able to fund additional home modifications and purchases of home modification equipment. with that then, i'm happy to answer any questions the

commission may have. >> commissioner knutzen: vice president spears? >> commissioner spears: thank you, michael. i just have one question. i love the fact that there is a partnership with the department of public health and the existing program. with this particular contract, the responsibility for reporting back to the state will be the responsibility of d.a.s., although we're partnering with the department of public health, is that how this will work? >> yeah, that is correct. so that is something we're going to -- we're going to have to work through as we develop this partnership with public health as to how that data is going to come back to us not only for reporting up to the california department of aging, but for our own purposes of understanding its effectiveness and impact. >> commissioner spears: and just a follow-up question. so the existing program, is that in the department of public health -- is that funded by the

state also or is it funded by the city? >> i actually do not know. i can check on that and get back to you. it does not -- i mean i can rule out it does not come from the california department of aging, if that helps. but i'll get a more complete answer for you. >> commissioner spears: i'm curious where the information will be held, is it in two different databases? that is my whole reporting question. >> you know, in all likelihood that is probably a scenario we're going to have to navigate. >> commissioner spears: okay. >> commissioner knutzen: any other questions from the commissioners on this item? great. okay, that's fine.

then i think that the difficulties we have with this is because we had a model program already that i'm sure, you know, served as a model for the state to expand that program and now we need to make it more efficient, but it's a great question for people to understand how that happened. let's see, can we open the -- madame secretary, anyone from the public who wishes to comment on this item? >> secretary: moderator, please open the line for public comment. members of the public that have dialed in and wish to provide public comment under this item please press pound 2 to answer the question queue. do we have any callers in the queue. >> announcer: i'm not showing any callers at this time. >> commissioner knutzen: thank you. all right. hearing no further requests to speak on the item, we will close public comment. is there a motion to pass this item?

>> so moved. >> commissioner knutzen: moved by commissioner sklar and i saw a second there from commissioner lum. yes, i did. madame secretary, please take roll call for agenda f. >> secretary: how do you vote? >> commissioner knutzen: yes. >> commissioner spears: yes. >> commissioner lum: yes. >> commissioner sklar: yes. >> secretary: president, the vote is unanimous. >> commissioner knutzen: thank you. commissioner, your next item is g, requesting authorization to enter into a new contract with cotchett, pitre & mccarthy, llp for the provision of legal services for the san francisco guardian and the san francisco public conservator through june 1, 2020 through may 31, 2021 not

to exceed $60,000. carrie wong will present the item, is that correct? or do we have someone else? there you go. janet. your audio. yeah. i can't hear her audio. please dial pound 2. your line is live. check to see if your phone is muted.

>> how we doing now? >> yep. >> all good? okay. >> good morning, commissioners and director mcfadden. we're presenting in carrie wong's absence. i'm the head attorney for the public guardian. apologies for the technical difficulties getting started. the public guardian and the public conservator seek approval to enter into a contract with cotchett, pitre & mccarthy to provide legal services for the public guardian and the public conservator regarding individuals under conservatorship by these two programs. these are two separate and distinct offices operated by the department. so the public guardian serves a

court appointed conservator of vulnerable san francisco residents who are unable to take care of their health, medical care, unable to manage their finances or they may be subject to undue influence and unable to resist fraud. most of the individuals that san francisco has in their program are persons with deteriorating forms of dementia. on the other hand, the san francisco public conservator serves as mental health conservator for san francisco residents. so also vulnerable, but they're gravely disabled. most of the individuals in the public conservator, so they have mental illness and have been found by a court unable or unwilling to accept voluntary treatment. the public guardian and public

conservator are to act in the best interest of their conserveties. at time, our office encounters where specialized -- the need for specialized legal services arise. this may be due to complex legal issues or serious issues that their assigned counsel are not experts at. that is the case here. that is why we're before you. so, we need to obtain -- the public guardian and the public conservator need to pay them for legal advice and if appropriate litigation services. so i'm not able to speak to confidential matters impacting the conserveties, happy to address questions you might have.

>> commissioner spears: i'm curious, where are most of the conservatees located? what kind of facilities are they located in? nursing homes? i have no idea. >> right. there is a variety of facilities primarily we do have conservatees who live in their own residences, they may be assisted-living, they may be in skilled nursing and they're pretty much spread out among the nine bay area counties given the housing crisis we have. >> commissioner spears: okay. thank you. >> commissioner knutzen: any other questions from the other commissioners? okay. i just wanted to clarify just a little. this is a contract for $60,000

and if we get into litigation, it looked like they were going to take that on contingency and then they would be charging per hour and does that go only up to $60,000? it's not an open-ended contract, right? >> it isn't. >> if it goes into litigation, the idea is that a decision will be made and a contingency fee contract would be arranged. so the $60,000 is a cap. >> commissioner knutzen: okay. thank you very much for clarifying that. okay. thank you for that. all right, then shall we -- is there any public comment on this item? >> secretary: moderator, please open the phone lines to public comment? members of the public that have dialed in and wish to provide

public comment under this item, please press pound 2 to enter the question queue. do we have any callers in the queue? >> not showing any at this time. >> secretary: thank you. >> commissioner knutzen: hearing no request to speak on this item, we will close public comment. is there a motion for the commissioners to approve this item? >> so moved. >> commissioner knutzen: okay. i saw commissioner lum, he is the person who moved and there was a second, vice president spears, thank you. madame secretary, can you take the roll call for agenda item g. >> secretary: how do you vote? >> commissioner knutzen: yes. >> commissioner spears: yes. >> commissioner lum: yes. >> commissioner sklar: yes. >> secretary: president, the

vote is unanimous. >> commissioner knutzen: great, thank you very much. and that concludes our agenda for today. are there any announcements? hearing none, i'll move along. is there a motion to adjourn our meeting today? commissioner lum and a second from vice president spears. then on behalf of the commission, i want to adjourn the meeting. thank you so much for everyone's work. again, we'll see you next month probably from the same time and place. everyone please take care. stay safe. >> thank you. >> thank you for being patient with me. >> thank you. >> i still can't figure it out. [ ♪ ]

>> in august 2019 construction began on the new facility at 1995 evans avenue in bayview. it will house motorcycle police

and department of forensic services division. both sfpd groups are in two buildings that need to be vacated. they will join the new $183 million facility in late 2021. >> elements of the cfi and the traffic company are housed at the hall of justice, which has been determined to be seismically unfit. it is slated for demolition. in addition to that the forensic services crime lab is also slated for demolition. it was time and made sense to put these elements currently spread in different parts of the city together into a new facility. >> the project is located in the bayview area, in the area near estes creek. when san francisco was first formed and the streetcars were

built back it was part of the bay. we had to move the building as close to the edge as possible on bedrock and solid elements piles down to make sure it was secure. >> it will be approximately 100,000 square feet, that includes 8,000 square feet for traffic company parking garage. >> the reason we needed too new building, this is inadequate for the current staffing needs and also our motor department. the officers need more room, secured parking. so the csi unit location is at the hall of justice, and the crime laboratory is located at building 60 sixty old hunters point shipyard. >> not co-located doesn't allow for easy exchange of information to occur.

>> traffic division was started in 1909. they were motor officers. they used sidecars. officers who road by themselves without the sidecar were called solo. that is a common term for the motorcycle officers. we have 45 officers assigned to the motorcycles. all parking at the new facility will be in one location. the current locker room with shared with other officers. it is not assigned to just traffic companies. there are two showers downstairs and up. both are gym and shop weres are old. it needs constant maintenance. >> forensic services provides five major types of testing. we develop fingerprints on substances and comparisons. there are firearms identification to deal with

projectiles, bullets or cartridge casings from shootings. dna is looking at a whole an rare of evidence from -- array of evidence from dna to sexual assault to homicide. we are also in the business of doing breath allyzer analysis for dui cases. we are resurrecting the gunshot residue testing to look for the presence of gunshot residue. lifespan is 50 years. >> it has been raised up high enough that if the bay starts to rise that building will operate. the facility is versus sustainable. if the lead gold highest. the lighting is led.

gives them good lights and reduces energy use way down. water throughout the project we have low water use facilities. gardens outside, same thing, low water use for that. other things we have are green roofs on the project. we have studies to make sure we have maximum daylight to bring it into the building. >> the new facility will not be open to the public. there will be a lobby. there will be a deconstruction motorcycle and have parts around. >> the dna labs will have a vestibule before you go to the space you are making sure the air is clean, people are coming in and you are not contaminating anything in the labs. >> test firing in the building you are generating lead and chemicals. we want to quickly remove that from the individuals who are

working in that environment and ensure what we put in the air is not toxic. there are scrubbers in the air to ensure any air coming out is also at the cleanest standards. >> you will see that kind of at the site. it has three buildings on the site. one is for the motorcycle parking, main building and back behind is a smaller building for evidence vehicles. there is a crime, crime scene. they are put into the secure facility that locks the cars down while they are examined. >> they could be vehicles involved in the shooting. there might be projectiles lodged in the vehicle, cartridge casings inside the vehicle, it could be a vehicle where a aggravated sexual occurred and there might be biological evidence, fingerprints, recovered merchandise from a potential robbery or other things. >> the greatest challenge on the

project is meeting the scope requirements of the project given the superheated construction market we have been facing. i am proud to say we are delivering a project where we are on budget. >> the front plaza on the corner will be inviting to the public. something that gives back to the public. the building sits off the edge. it helps it be protected. >> what we are looking for is an updated knowledg building, with facilities to meet our unit's needs. >> working with the san francisco police department is an honor and privilege. i am looking forward to seeing their faces as the police officers move to the new facility. >> it is a welcome change, a new surrounding that is free from all of the challenges that we face with being remote, and then

the ability to offer new expanded services to the city and police department investigations unit. i can't wait until fall of 2021 when the building is finally ready to go and be occupied and the people can get into the facility to serve them and serve the community. >> he is a real leader that listens and knows how to bring people together. brought this department together like never before. i am so excited to be swearing in the next chief of the san francisco fire department, ladies and gentlemen, let's

welcome, jeanine nicholson. (applause). >> i grew up total tomboy, athlete. i loved a good crisis, a good challenge. i grew up across the street from the fire station. my dad used to take me there to vote. i never saw any female firefighters because there weren't any in the 1970s. i didn't know i could be a fire fighter. when i moved to san francisco in 1990, some things opened up. i saw women doing things they hadn't been doing when i was growing up. one thing was firefighting. a woman recruited me at the

gay-pride parade in 1991. it was a perfect fit. i liked using my brain, body, working as a team, figuring things out, troubleshooting and coming up with different ways to solve a problem. in terms of coming in after another female chief, i don't think anybody says that about men. you are coming in after another man, chief, what is that like. i understand why it is asked. it is unusual to have a woman in this position. i think san francisco is a trailblazer in that way in terms of showing the world what can happen and what other people who may not look like what you think the fire chief should look like how they can be successful. be asked me about being the first lbgq i have an understands because there are little queer

kids that see me. i worked my way up. i came in january of 1994. i built relationships over the years, and i spent 24 years in the field, as we call it. working out of firehouses. the fire department is a family. we live together, eat together, sleep in the same dorm together, go to crazy calls together, dangerous calls and we have to look out for one another. when i was burned in a fire years ago and i felt responsible, i felt awful. i didn't want to talk to any of my civilian friends. they couldn't understand what i was going through. the firefighters knew, they understood. they had been there. it is a different relationship. we have to rely on one another. in terms of me being the chief of the department, i am really trying to maintain an open

relationship with all of our members in the field so myself and my deputy chiefs, one of the priorities i had was for each of us to go around to different fire stations to make sure we hit all within the first three or four months to start a conversation. that hasn't been there for a while. part of the reason that i am getting along well with the field now is because i was there. i worked there. people know me and because i know what we need. i know what they need to be successful. >> i have known jeanine nicholson since we worked together at station 15. i have always held her in the highest regard. since she is the chief she has infused the department with optimism. she is easy to approach and is

concerned with the firefighters and paramedics. i appreciate that she is concerned with the issues relevant to the fire department today. >> there is a retired captain who started the cancer prevention foundation 10 years ago because he had cancer and he noticed fellow firefighters were getting cancer. he started looking into it. in 2012 i was diagnosed with breast canner, and some of my fellow firefighters noticed there are a lot of women in the san francisco fire department, premenopausal in their 40s getting breast cancer. it was a higher rate than the general population. we were working with workers comp to make it flow more easily for our members so they didn't have to worry about the paper

work when they go through chemo. the turnout gear was covered with suit. it was a badge to have that all over your coat and face and helmet. the dirtier you were the harder you worked. that is a cancer causeser. it -- casser. it is not -- cancer causer. there islassic everywhere. we had to reduce our exposure. we washed our gear more often, we didn't take gear where we were eating or sleeping. we started decontaminating ourselves at the fire scene after the fire was out. going back to the fire station and then taking a shower. i have taught, worked on the decontamination policy to be sure that gets through.

it is not if or when. it is who is the next person. it is like a cancer sniper out there. who is going to get it next. one of the things i love about the fire department. it is always a team effort. you are my family. i love the city and department and i love being of service. i vow to work hard -- to work hard to carry out the vision of the san francisco fire department and to move us forward in a positive way. if i were to give a little advice to women and queer kids, find people to support you. keep putting one foot in front of the other and keep trying. you never know what door is going to open next. you really don't.

[cheers and

>> after my fire in my apartment and losing everything, the red cross gave us a list of agencies in the city to reach out to and i signed up for the below-market rate program. i got my certificate and started applying and won the housing lottery. [♪] >> the current lottery program began in 2016. but there have been lot rows that have happened for affordable housing in the city for much longer than that. it was -- there was no standard practice. for non-profit organizations that were providing affordable housing with low in the city,

they all did their lotteries on their own. private developers that include in their buildings affordable units, those are the city we've been monitoring for some time since 1992. we did it with something like this. where people were given circus tickets. we game into 291st century in 2016 and started doing electronic lotteries. at the same time, we started electronic applications systems. called dalia. the lottery is completely free. you can apply two ways. you can submit a paper application, which you can download from the listing itself. if you a plo apply online, it wl take five minutes. you can make it easier creating an account. to get to dalia, you log on to

housing.sfgov.org. >> i have lived in san francisco for almost 42 years. i was born here in the hayes valley. >> i applied for the san francisco affordable housing lottery three times. >> since 2016, we've had about 265 electronic lotteries and almost 2,000 people have got their home through the lottery system. if you go into the listing, you can actually just press lottery results and you put in your lottery number and it will tell you exactly how you ranked. >> for some people, signing up for it was going to be a challenge. there is a digital divide here and especially when you are trying to help low and very low income people. so we began providing digital assistance for folks to go in and get help.

>> along with the income and the residency requirements, we also required someone who is trying to buy the home to be a first time home buyer and there's also an educational component that consists of an orientation that they need to attend, a first-time home buyer workshop and a one-on-one counseling session with the housing councilor. >> sometimes we have to go through 10 applicants before they shouldn't be discouraged if they have a low lottery number. they still might get a value for an available, affordable housing unit. >> we have a variety of lottery programs. the four that you will most often see are what we call c.o.p., the certificate of preference program, the dthp which is the displaced penance housing preference program.

the neighborhood resident housing program and the live worth preference. >> i moved in my new home february 25th and 2019. the neighborhood preference program really helped me achieve that goal and that dream was with eventually wind up staying in san francisco. >> the next steps, after finding out how well you did in the lottery and especially if you ranked really well you will be contacted by the leasing agent. you have to submit those document and income and asset qualify and you have to pass the credit and rental screening and the background and when you qualify for the unit, you can chose the unit and hopefully sign that lease. all city sponsored affordable housing comes through the system and has an electronic lottery. every week there's a listing on

dalia. something that people can apply for. >> it's a bit hard to predict how long it will take for someone to be able to move into a unit. let's say the lottery has happened. several factors go into that and mainly how many units are in the project, right. and how well you ranked and what preference bucket you were in. >> this particular building was brand new and really this is the one that i wanted out of everything i applied for. in my mind, i was like how am i going to win this? i did and when you get that notice that you won, it's like at first, it's surreal and you don't believe it and it sinks in, yeah, it happened. >> some of our buildings are pretty spectacular. they have key less entry now. they have a court yard where they play movies during the weekends, they have another master kitchen and space where

people can throw parties. >> mayor breed has a plan for over 10,000 new units between now and 2025. we will start construction on about 2,000 new units just in 2020. >> we also have a very big portfolio like over 25,000 units across the city. and life happens to people. people move. so we have a very large number of rerentals and resales of units every year. >> best thing about working for the affordable housing program is that we know that we're making a difference and we actually see that difference on a day-to-day basis. >> being back in the neighborhood i grew up in, it's a wonderful experience. >> it's a long process to get through. well worth it when you get to the other side. i could not be happier.

[♪]