to have a service in mind. i think that is a wonderful thing to do. so what i'm going to do is open it up to the board and then we'll take some public comment as well. but i'm just mindful of the time. let's go forward. >> thanks, commissioner. you can see i'm struggling with my video and connection. i hope that you can hear me well. >> go ahead. >> okay, so let me first, mr. billsky, treasure island museum, thank you very much for your dedication for this important matter. also i want to thank you for the great presentation, ms. kelly and the others of the center. absolutely that the next

steps for us is to reconvene and bring, we kind of brainstorm on how we are going to treat this space, the historical significance that all of you have alluded to. it is such an important one in the history of african americans in this country that they are not to be >>ann: takings. so wherever we decide and want to make that clear, should be something that is substantial. that we'll be able to convey the history, the importance of this particular event and also have the input of the stakeholders so that at the end we are not only doing justice, we are making sure that the injustice that were conducted as a result of this trial is somehow mitigated.

so that's what i stand for and i'm glad and i think from the title commission standpoint, we have made that very clear. so let's reconvene for the next steps and i'm sure we'll be meeting one on one and join and brainstorm, but i think we are moving in the right direction. so, thank you to all the researchers and everyone that is involved. in the end, i think this is going to be wonderful. thank you. >> any other comment? mike, go ahead. >> thank you for this great presentation. the moments in history have been too long buried and people are becoming more aware of it.

but the tragedy and travesty involved is just heartbreaking. i was wondering if memorializing not just the 50 but the 200 plus people who were killed by being forced to do something that was unsafe, that somewhere their names might also be placed. there might not be room. although, i think it's a possibility and certainly something to look at and to especially for the families, i think that would be a very important aspect of this memorial. thank you. >> thank you, mark.

anybody else? >> i wanted to say something quickly. one thing i failed to say in my presentation is that there is a lot of very serious efforts right now to try to exonerate these and these are coming from outside the congressional area delegates to get congress to get the navy to do something on this. but thanks to the great partnership that the national parks service has developed with the u.s. army, they have also have been very invested in the story and agast to the injustice and there is a military push right now on the department of defense to have the navy over turn the conviction and exonerate the men. i think it's important for you to be aware of that. this is the closest that we have ever been. chicago has been

working on this for many years and i think it's coming in the next couple of years. i think the men may be exonerated and when that happens, not if, i think it's going to be even more important to treasure island as they are right there on board recognizing this history and honoring those men in the appropriate manner. >> thank you very much, kelly. is there any public comment? >> i have some. >> go ahead. >> i want to say the presentations were very detailed and i'm very appreciative. i like the way that we are seeing the vision of the design and connecting the points. the question i had about that part, is it possible to do

etching on the concrete on the wall, footprints, even the etching of the tank. i'm right there with mark on memorializing the names and as linda said, how do we use this space? are those things we can think about? you know, maybe i watched too much -- but i'm seeing the whole panel on the vision. kelly, that is one of the most extensive presentations i have ever heard. my great uncles and my grandfather served in the navy and they lived in the bay area at the time. are we connecting and where is the trial? i appreciate your research. it is so detailed. are there any connections that you are making with the bay area

veterans. we have a whole community here on the island. i know it was some time ago, but i'm one of those people, you know, who come from that generation. my grandfather, my great uncle, you know. i have heard these bits and parts of this story throughout the years, but, you know being my generation, you know, it wasn't on my radar until now. so i would like to see what we can do with that, with that bay area connection with us being right here on treasure island and where this was established and this is where the trial happened. i look forward to this project. this is exciting. thank you so much. >> yes, i think the board is certainly behind the ideas that you presented today and it's just a matter of refinement. >> we'll take public comment

now. >> there are no callers in the queue. >> okay, we'll go on to the next agenda item. thank you very much for the presentation today. thank you. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. >> item no. 9. resolution approving the use of a portion of authority parcel e 1.2 for residential step down transitional housing and treatment programs in accordance with the disposition and development agreement and one treasure island agreement and authorize the director to enter into these uses. >> thank you, members and chair of the board. as you know we now have our first two residential projects in construction with shares and catholic charities

and we have been doing it with considerable amount of planning to prepare for the health rise 360 and community partnership buildings that are to come. at this point in time, we have been doing additional work with the department of public health as a partner in the 360 building and they are prepared to help with financing and our goal is to assist in pursuing the reports for rise 360 building. >> natalie has been helping with this and working on these

projects. welcome, natalie. >> hi, thank you so much. i want to see. can you see my screen? >> yes, we can see the screen. >> good. i have lost my ability to see you all when i shared my screen. if there is any questions, please definitely be verbal. i wanted to first of all say what a tough act to follow. that's an incredible presentation and what a joy in the building and forensics and history. this is a tough act for following but thank you for having me. i'm here for the ti parcel e 1.2 form of sight -- site control

for new funding for state of ca community care expansion. as you know it's operated by the island -- and since 2011 when the dda was also executed. that agreement calls for replacement on the treasure island's unit and program. and as bob just said, the first two vertical project are part of that first unit effort, the first for veterans and homeless and low-income veterans and all existing as the units and for tco in january next year. it's very exciting and also exciting

the project that just closed for the ground breaking events which will include replacement of all the catholic charities and include other affordable units that is all part of the replacement project. and how it operates on treasure island and with the other treasure island numbers. in partnership with treasure island and the department of public health and the office of mayor on housing and to expand

capacity. we started to identify this next phase. you can see it's kiddie corner from the center. the site is 1.14 acres. it will be used for two different purposes. the portion of this site and what we are here for today is for the replacement and expansion and the remainder of the site will be used up to 100 units with two bedrooms and the affordable units. again, one more time, today we are asking for a site commitment only for the gph and hr 360 portion of the site. so, the turn key developer for the building is proposed to be mercy housing, and it would be a

maximum of 150 bedrooms and there would be 2-3 beds per bedroom. up to 450 beds at maximum. this building would compensate for the replacement of all the hr 360 units and help make meet 2 expansion needs and why it's the expansion for capacity. the reason we keep focusing on the expansion is that the funding application which we hope to fly if we are successful today is for expansion beds only. the funding program is a new state program and administered by the department of social services. it's the same for our target population and recipients of social security income.

the application is over the counter but already expected -- our area has already reached its goal, but as far as we know it's the only application from the city and county of san francisco. and -- yes? >> so we would apply for the funds this month and must be expended in 2026. we will apply for $10-15 million and the remaining funding for the rest of the building would stem from both department of public health services as well as treasure island projects sources as the

principal developer contribution as well as potentially irfd proceeds and this money really affords the opportunity. thank you for the opportunity to present. >> thank you. i will put it out for questions. i have a question about this, can we see a map of that again so we understand exactly where that location was. this is a parcel and location

for the affordable housing. >> that's correct, in the balance of the major phase 1, we have four additional parcels that are designated for affordable housing. but the this is one of the two sites of what we call phase 2 which is going to be moving into development. so this site has actually already been subject to action. it still needs to go through surcharging, but it is in preparation for future

development. so we are looking at this parcel and the other parcel that are within stage 2 of the ideal locations for the future rise 360 and the other location for housing, and when doing some test bits on the two sites and this seems to be the best for the program. >> i'm sorry, on my computer, it says i'm sharing. you don't see it? >> we just see a gray screen right now. peter, could you pass me the ball and i will put it up real quick. >> sorry about that.

>> i'm just wondering about the adjacent uses in that area. this is not the portion but the eastern portion, is that correct? >> yes, do you see my screen now? >> yes. >> is my screen visible to you? >> yes, it is. if you talk about the adjacent uses and what they are? >> these are all residential. this zone here is zoned as mixed use, and so this would front

what would be trade winds from california avenue. it's kiddie corner from the sailing center, but these other buildings here would be all residential. this is east side commons which is a bike and ped green belt. it's not a roadway that goes through the east side neighborhood. the other affordable site that we have currently in what we are calling stage two is this parcel here and in stage 3, we have two additional parcels here, but in terms of trying to move forward with the replacement of housing for health right -- rise and home rise, this 1 and 2 parcel and the 1.3 parcel were the ones under evaluation and the e 1.2

is better suited based on our evaluation. >> okay, have you discussed it also with tidd as to the location and with their various projects? >> yes, they are aware that this is the site that is under evaluation. again, all of these sites, these affordable sites were designated under the original land use plan for the island. >> okay, thank you. i think it's important to us to provide housing and i am in support of this. i open it up to the board member. >> yes, go ahead.

>> thank you, natalie for that presentation. i am glad to actually put the motion to approve this resolution and here are my reasons, you know, we have talked to the city and for building housing on treasure island is the reason we want that lease. housing how many variations and it is not a one size fits all. in this particular situation, you have a city agency department of public health involved in housing in a transition housing, not permanent, but there are those that need housing, up to one point. and then transition to the other forms of housing. this is basically where we are

offering the solutions to all of these very complex issues in san francisco. so, i think all of us needs to be commended on this title and for staff moving forward for implementing this. yes for the resolution. the question that i have and i know that after this resolution, dpw and another city agency is involved in housing and because of treasure island we would design our model. the other funding sources that is as you had mentioned the irfd and possibility for the ticg, could you briefly explain and also how the timeline that we have in completing the so that we can begin from the planning state to the actual construction in one or two sentences, please.

>> >> the irfd are the tax increment revenues from the development of the island that are pledged to affordable housing. the housing subsidy is a payment from the icd to tida to help replace our housing obligations and it's $17,500 for every market rate residential unit that is constructed that goes into a fund to help us develop the replacement of housing. so, and one of the things that's challenging with this particular project is that a lot of conventional affordable housing funding sources are limited to

permanent supportive housing. so for instance tax increment financing. is only for permanent supportive housing. that avenue of funding for this project is not available to us because this is, these are transitional housing units and treatment program units. so, the importance of the housing subsidy which does not come with any restraints and the sources like that is essential for bringing this project forward. >> that's why the creativity is essential. the only thing i wanted to add -- >> can you hear me? >> yes, we heard your last comment. >> yes, basically what i'm saying here is absolutely we

have identified the needs, we know it's essential. that's why the meeting of the minds from all the stakeholders, from our supervisors, from just about everyone, all of us are entrusted and this is where further conversations to ensure that we have completed and lastly like i said before, there are many for transitional housing and then supportive housing, and we need to argue that and with this model, we are in a position to address all the others complex issues to get to where we are. so, again, my motion is to move this resolution as quickly as possible. >> thank you. thank you for your presentation. natalie wants to speak and then i will take comments from the other directors.

>> thank you. i agree that this financing is critical and to public health and to spend to geo bonds and in addition to creative financing and there is public sources that will make this project happen and of course with all the resources and the title and land and clean and titled. i just wanted to add that it will take many public sources to make this project happen and it's extraordinary hard to leverage with this financing and this kind of project. i just wanted to enhance some of the funding strategy. thank you. >> thank you, natalie. >> mark, go ahead? >> i would like to say it's a very important piece of our work. >> thank you, mark. the motion has been made and

seconded. shondra, do you have any comments or questions? >> no. the motion is before the board. do we have any public comment? >> no one is signed up. >> we have a motion and second. >> >> roll call, please. >> >>clerk: [roll call] >> there are 4 ayes. >> thank you, the ayes have it. thank you very much for this, and it's a third project going forward and hope to get the funding.

thank you natalie for joining us today. >> thank you for having me. >> next item? >> item no. 10. discussion of future items by director? >> any other items? >> mark, i see your hand, go ahead. >> this isn't going to make me many friends. we don't necessarily have to put it out in the next agenda. but when we are looking at creating a very special unique environment here that will be in many ways the superior investment to many of those around this area and one way to keep the natural preserve naturalness of this area would be to not allow feral cats. many people think that if they own a

cat it's cruel to let them stay inside, but yet the fact proves that they have destroyed a third of our birds in the united states. if we allow feral cats and otherwise outside cats, if we allow them, we won't have the beautiful bird watching ability for the beautiful environment that attract all sort of natural inhabitant. i was hoping that might be something to discuss in the future. it won't be popular, but to have an environmentally sound project, we need to take care of that issue. >> okay,