service with quality ingredients and quality products and need to be know that person the person behind the products it is not like okay. who >> you call this meeting to order. my name is bob fuller, man tear jr the sanitation and streets commission. welcome to this commission's first standalone meeting. i will facilitate this meeting until a commission chair is elected as scheduled in item 4. i will now call the roll. please respond with here or present. >> thomas harrison? >> here.

>> harrison is here. kimberlee hartwig-schulman? >> here. >> commissioner hartwig-schulman is here. >> ike kwon? >> here. >> commissioner kwon is here. >> commissioner mogannam is here. >> christopher simi? >> present. >> commissioner simi is here. with five members present, we do have quorum for the sanitation and streets commission. due to the on going covid-19 health emergency and given the public health recommendations issued by the san francisco department of public health and the emergency orders of the governor and the mayor concerning social distancing and lifting the restrictions on teleconference, this meeting is being held, is being held via teleconference

and streamed by sfgov tv. those watching the live stream being be aware there's a brief time lag between the time lag and what's shown on sfgt tv. i would love to extend our thanks to sfgov tv services and building management for their assistance putting on this meeting. for members of the public wishing to make public comment on an item outside, from outside the hearing room, you would dial 415-655-0001. and the meeting id is 24867157568. followed by pound and then pound again. to raise your hand to speak and please press star three. please note you must limit your comments to the topic of the agenda item being discussed unless you're speaking during

the general public comment period. to remind you, if you do not stay on the topic, the chair can interrupt ask ask you to limb out your -- and ask you to limit your comment to the agenda item. we ask the public comment is made in a civil and respectful manner and you refrain from the use of profanity. please address your remarks to the commission as a whole, not to an individual commissioners or staff. fortunately today, we have chinese, spanish and filipino interpreters for consecutive interpretation during public comment only. we'll now have the interpreters introduce themselves in their respective languages. >> interpreter: [speaking foreign language]

thank you! >> interpreter: [speaking foreign language] you have been unmuted.

>> interpreter: [speaking foreign language] thank you. >> thank you to the interpreters for being here today. we will now consider item 3, the adoption of the rules of order of the sanitation and streets commission. if we could have those slides brought up, please.

the rules of order were distributed to the commission and published online for the public to review and a -- pardon me, not an order of intent, a notice of intent was also published to notify the public of the potential adoption or the consideration of the rules today. but before speaking specifically to the rules of order, i wanted to provide the commission and the public with an overview of the plan for how agendas will be created and then an overview of how a solution is adopted since today we'll be taking on items 3, 5, and 6 and they will require adopting resolutions for each. from there, we will have a discussion of amendments to the rules of

order and just a note to commissioners, you do have a copy of the drafted rules of order as proposed by staff in your packet today. so, if we could have the next slide, please. so, this is a rough outline of how agenda setting will take place. the bulk of agenda items will be for contracts for the commission to consider along with reports from, pardon me, reports by the department to fulfill the proposition b mandate. we'll also add to this stream informational items the department believes are important to share as well as request by the commission for additional information or larger explorations of a given topic in form of a hearing and we'll also have organizational items, such as amendments to the rules of

order, honorary resolutions and items to update how the commission operates. so, as you see on the far left, we have many streams coming together to create potential agenda item was the largest stream being contracts. and please note items coming from the report, contracts ask reports go through a multilayer of process -- if it's a contract, that particular project manager supervisor through the contract administration and our finance folks as well as the city attorney's office is reviewing most of the or reviewing items as well. and we use a workflow tool that public works it uses to keep us organized to ensure

all items have been reviewed thoroughly. this process takes approximately seven weeks, which means that request for additional reporting or deeper dives into the data likely won't be available at the next commission meeting. in some instances, even the meeting after that, if the response needs to be its own agenda item. however, responses to request for information that is more readily available can be available much sooner, such as a report or chart that can be included as a memo to the commission. the reports mandated by the ballot measure from 2020, essentially form the spine of our meeting calendar. regio will show you an outline of what reports to expect. from there, we'll work with the commission

chair and the department head to create agendas that's robust and reasonable if their number of items and the amount of information that is reasonable to digest at a time. so, i will work to ensure that a draft an agenda is available to the commission chair seven to ten days in advance of the meeting. the chair will review and have input on whether the agenda is reasonable and whether we're getting through the material. both those items from the department and the commission and doing it in an appropriate amount of time. this is also an opportunity to plan one of the items initiated by commissioners that should be scheduled and discussed organizational matters. this is an iterative process between the commission chair, the department head, and myself and there may be back and forth between the chair and the department and approved agenda will be published to the

commission at least 72 hours prior to the meeting with every effort to publish it before then. one of the tools to help the chair and department head make decisions about the agenda items is an advanced calendar and i'll provide staff and commissioners, which gives fair notice of reports and contracts that we're expecting at the next several meetings and i request any questions or request regarding an agenda item leading up to the commission meeting. if there's a particular item that's particularly complex or you'd like to more information about it before the commission meeting, please send me those questions and we'll -- while the published presentation may not be able to be changed, responses to questions raised with a fair amount of notice can be incorporated into the talking points of the staff presenting. one other note, the department

will work to address any questions that couldn't be addressed during the meeting with a response that will be provided through the commission staff and chair, likely in the form of a memo. if it's a larger topic that can't be addressed in a simple memo, we'll work to add it to a future agenda. my advice is that any request for new or different items, different reports should be made with support of more than one commissioner and that the chair request that the department prepare information for a future meeting and if we can turn to slide 3, please. forgive me if i'm taking you back to procedure 101, but i wanted to take, to touch on the basics of adopting a resolution for your benefit and for the members of the public who may be less familiar with the resolutions. essentially, a resolution is the document formalizing a decision

made by the commission. whether that is approving a contract, changing the rules of order or honoring a department staff member for outstanding service. all resolutions will be accompanied by a staff report, giving you and the public a thumbnail sketch of that item and a presentation or other attachments may accompany it if the item is being heard individually on the regular agenda. or if it needs more explanation. as commissioners, you can request briefing on items you find complex, sensitive or you want to know more ahead of a decision that you'll need to make. the department will also suggest briefings. for example, we'll schedule briefings ahead of your september 22nd meeting to discuss the contract delegation policy, which is -- i'm sure several members of the staff can

say is not something that can just be explained in a five-minute presentation very easily, so our agenda will have a regular item -- it will have a regular item calendar and consent item calendar. regular items are heard and voted on individually while consent items are heard as a group and voted on with one vote. please note the consent items -- they tend to be routine matters or low dollar contracts. consent items will also be published for public review and distributed to commissioners. one other important thing is that consent items may be heard as a regular item at the request of commissioners, staff, or the public. i suggest making -- if you as a commissioner want an item heard individually, please make that request a couple of

days in advance so department staff can prepare a presentation. i'll touch on quorum. for our commission of sanitation and streets, quorum is a majority of seats on the commission, which is three and passage of items must receive at least three yes votes except for procedural matters. so, we always, in order to do business, we'll need at least three of you here and in order to pass anything, at least three people will have to be in favor of it. our general order of hearing an item is the presentation, including any clarifying questions from commissioners followed by a motion. then, public comment, discussion and debate and final a vote on it. if we could turn to slide 4, please. as i mentioned earlier, commissioners receive the drafted rules of order suggested

by staff in advance of this meeting and they were published for public review and a notice of intent was posted publicly, at least ten days in advance of this meeting, so this commission is able to consider the drafted rules of order having met those requirements. the commission will -- may discuss any amendments raised. i suggest we discuss any amendments and then make a single motion to adopt all non-substantive changes, non-substantive amendments might include changes -- changing dates of terms of office so the chair or vice-chair or other minor procedural things. if there is a substantive amendment raised, those amendments -- their adoption can either be made at a later date or we can continue -- they can be made at

a later date after we adopt the rules today or we can continue the adoption of the rules of order to a later date depending on how the commission wants to do this. okay! okay! and any substantive changes to these rules of order would require, again, public notice and we have ample time before the september 22nd meeting to do so. substantive amendments might include adding or deleting a section to an article or changing the powers of the chair. always of course, in alignment with the city charter and administrative code and the laws of california and the constitution of the united states as well. i will take note of any non-substantive amendments for which there's a consensus to include in a single

motion. i will take note of any substantive amendments for adoption at a later date as well. so, and i send -- i send this to the commission earlier this week and two amendments raised by staff and sent to commissioners in advance of this meeting, the first one is the amendment to article ii section iii, deleting july and replacing it with december so the commission calendar of meeting is organized on a calendar year as opposed to currently it's organized on a fiscal year. most other commissions in the city do have their regular meeting calendar organized on a calendar year. the amendment for this would also require the insertion of language along the lines of

the commission will adopt the initial regular calendar for september 2022 through june 2023 as it is on the agenda today and then the commission will then adopt a calendar of regular meeting dates for july 2023 through december 2023, this december 2022. afterwards, the regular calendar will be adopted for a 12-month calendar year. this is -- this is a non-substantive amendment and can be made today on the face of the document. we can discuss this amendment and if there is consensus included in a single motion of non-substantive amendments. is there any discussion of this proposed amendment? just so you know, you can -- especially for the

commissioner sitting behind me while i'm chairing, you can ask to be recognized and i'll see you on here, so that the folks in front of me don't get more attention than the folks behind me. so. .... hearing no comments, we can include this amendment in the full motion. it sounds like we have consensus, okay. >> i move to accept. >> okay. we won't take a motion just yet. we'll talk about each potential amendment and then we'll take a single motion. thank you, commissioner. okay. so, we'll include that first amendment. the second amendment is -- would be to article ii, section i and this is a very similar one. deleting july and

inserting either december or january as the month of annual officer elections. changing to either december or january would align this commission with most other commissions that are organized on a calendar year. the amendment would also insert one of two options for the initial terms. the first option being that the initial term of officers will conclude in december 2022 or money lex of officers -- upon elections of 2020 and officers will be elected to serve a full 12-month term. so this option would be the shortened first term with an election at the end of this year. the other option that we can discuss is a longer initial term with the next election

scheduled for december 2023, so the initial officers instead would have a roughly 15-month term. and the initial terms of commission of officers would end 2023 or money lexs -- and after this initial term, officers will serve a 12-month term. this is a non-substantive amendment and can be made today on the face of the document. we can discuss this amendment and the options that are in it and if there's consensus included in a single motion of non-substantive amendments. is there any discussion of this proposed amendment? >> is this the discussion of the proposed amendment or -- >> commissioner mogannam? >> i'm sorry. is this the discussion of the amendment or a

choice because i believe we have to make a decision here? >> so the choice would be and we have two choices. we could continue to have officers serve on a fiscal year calendar which would be doing nothing to the rules of order. if we amending the rules of order for the term of the chair, it would be either having the first chair and vice-chair serve a very short-term until december and then getting on to a normal schedule or the second option or i guess, it would be the third option, it would be having those initial -- those first officers serve a longer term until december of next year. are there any preferences around this amendment? >> i have no problem with sync

up with everyone else's calendar. it helps staff more than anyone and i don't have much of an opinion whether we want to do -- i think short-term is great to get everybody's feet wet and we'll continue regardless, so i would recommend going with the shorter term. >> okay. >> yeah. >> is there any other -- commissioner harrison? >> yes, i would agree with that shorter term. >> okay. any other discussion of this proposed amendment? okay. hearing no opposition, we can add this second amendment with a shorter term for the first -- for the initial officers to serve through december 2022 and then we will hold an election at

that time so that the next term of officers would be for a full 12-month period. okay, thank you. having gone through the two amendments suggested by staff, is -- are there any other amendments to these rules of order that the -- that commissioners would like to suggest? okay. seeing, for those listening along, i'm seeing a lot of shaking heads saying no further amendments. do i hear a motion to adopt the sanitation and streets commission rules of order including amendments to the calendar year and to the term of service for officers? >> commissioner harrison some

>> i would move to approve with the amendments. >> i'll second it. >> commissioner kwon seconded it. okay. having a motion on the table, we will now turn to public comment before talking a vote on it. before any further discussion and a vote. okay. thank you for that motion. we will now turn to public comment for these amended rules of order. members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment on this item no. three, the amended rules of order, if you are here with us physically in room 408, please line up against the wall furthest from the door. and if you are calling in from outside of the hearing room, please dial 415-655-0001. and the meeting number access

code is 24867157568. followed by pound and pound again and in order to be recognized, please dial star 3 on your touch pad. and it appears that we do not have any members of the public present lining up who want to speak. sfgov tv, do we have any members of the public who have called in and expressed interest in speaking?

>> can you hear me now? >> you're now unmuted. you will have three minute to speak and i'll give you a 30-second warning at that time. thank you, caller. go ahead and begin your comments. >> okay. assuming you can hear me okay. it's david. i'm in another meeting but just wanted to take a moment and say if you've got a motion to adopt an amended set of the rules, that's fine. if there's anything else that needs to be updated, i'm assuming we'll be back looking at the rule from time-to-time and if i see anything, i'm happy to share and i'm sorry i'm out with you right now but as soon as my other meeting wraps up, you'll have my full attention. i promise that. thanks for listening. >> thank you, caller. sfgov tv, if there are any other callers, please unmute them. okay.

hearing no other, seeing there are no other members of the public interested in speaking on this topic, is there any debate on this motion to adopt the rules of order? amended rules of order, pardon me? okay. hearing no debate, i will call the roll. please answer either yes or no. >> commissioner harrison? >> yes. >> harrison votes yes. commissioner hartwig-schulman? >> yes. >> commissioner hartwig-schulman votes yes. >> commissioner kwon? >> yes. >> commissioner kwon votes yes. commissioner mogannam?

>> yes. >> commissioner mogannam votes yes. commissioner simi? >> yes. >> commissioner simi votes yes. with five votes in the affirmative, the resolution as amended is adopted. the rules of order will be published to the commission website and made available to the public as well as distributed to commissioners for their use on this commission. thank you very much. [gavel] we'll turn to item no. 4. the election of sanitation and streets commission chair and vice-chair. if we can bring up the slide for this, please. okay. so, given our amendment to the rules of order, the term of the chair and vice-chair will begin after this vote and run through december 2022. for the

chair, i have suggested remarks to system in leading the rest of the meeting, so you're not flying without control. the commission may elect the chair and the vice-chair in a single motion or can elect them individually. i'll take questions and then we can hear all nominations for both the chair and the vice-chair. are there any questions about this election? okay. hearing none. do i hear a nomination for chair of the commission? commissioner harrison? >> i'll take the liberty of nominating ike kwon as chair.

>> do i hear a second? oh! commissioner kwon and you can second yourself if you would like. >> well, i appreciate the nomination. i was going to nominate maryo mogannam for president or chair. >> to be clear, commissioner kwon, you are not accepting the nomination? >> i'll decline at this moment. >> okay. >> thank you. >> and making a separate nomination for maryo, commissioner maryo mogannam. okay. and then it appears that commissioner harrison, did you want to respond to that? >> no, i'm sorry. >> okay. and then commissioner kwon, did you also have -- okay, you just took yourself off of there, but commissioner mogannam, do you have any response to this nomination? >>

>> i will graciously accept. >> okay. [laughter] >> okay. thank you. are there any other nominations for chair or vice-chair? >> i was going to graciously second, i think. >> oh, thank you for the second. >> for commissioner mogannam. >> okay. okay. thank you for that second. are there any nominations, any other nominations for either chair or vice-chair? >> uh yes, i have one and i was going to nominate thomas harrison for chair. >> i would decline. >> okay. okay. and then commissioner mogannam, do you

have a nomination? >> i have a nomination of ike kwon as vice-chair, if you would graciously accept. >> am i permitted to -- >> yes, please, commissioner kwon. >> am i permitted to ask my fellow commissioners if i'm interested in vice-chair? >> certainly -- you certainly have the floor, yes. >> okay. if my other commissioners -- no. >> i'm fine either way. >> would you like to be vice-chair? >> not really. [laughter] >> okay. then, i accept. >> okay, commissioner kwon accepts. is there a second to this nomination? >> i'll second that. >> harrison seconds. okay. are there any other nominations to either chair or vice-chair?

okay. hearing none. we can take this either as a single vote for both the election of commissioner mogannam to chair and commissioner kwon to vice-chair or we can vote on them separately. is there any preference amongst this group. commissioner mogannam, your hand is up. >> i would make it that we make one single vote. >> one single vote. is there any objection? okay. hearing no other nominations, we will now turn to public comment on this nomination of commissioner maryo mogannam as chair of this commission and commissioner ike kwon as vice-chair of this commission. members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment on item 4, the nomination of commissioner

chair and vice-chair, if you are present here in the hearing room, please line up against the wall furthest from the door. and if you are calling in, you can dial 415-655-0001. and meeting number access code is 24867157568. followed by pound and then pound again. and then press star three to raise your hand to speak. okay. it appears we have one caller, sf gov tv. oh, looking in the room, we do not have any members of the public here with us today interested in speaking. and sf gov tv has let me know there's one caller who would like to speak. please unmute them. caller, you have three minutes

to speak and i will give you a 30-second notice when your time is about to elapse. >> david, i assume you can hear me. i'm still stuck in my other thing but i'm supportive of the motion. anyone willing to serve, happy to have you. do a fine job. thanks for listening. >> thank you, caller. sf gov tv, do we have any others? they are lesing me know there's no other callers -- they are letting me know there's no other callers. thank you to the public for speaking to this. that concludes any public comment. is there any debate on this motion to elect commissioner mogannam as chair and commissioner kwon as vice-chair? seeing no hands raised, i will call the roll on

this nomination to elect maryo mogannam as the chair and ike kwon as the vice-chair of the sanitation and streets commission. please answer with a yes or no. commissioner harrison? >> yes. >> harrison votes yes. >> commissioner hartwig-schulman? >> yes. >> hartwig-schulman votes yes. commissioner kwon? >> yes. >> commissioner kwon votes yes. commissioner mogannam? >> yes. >> mogannam votes yes. commissioner simi? >> yes. >> simi votes yes. with five votes in favor -- in the affirmative, this nomination succeeds. congratulations, commissioner mogannam -- chair mogannam. we'll take a moment to transfer you the gavel and provide our new chair with suggested remarks. [gavel]

okay. [laughter] >> we'll just take one moment. >> other duties to the side. >> [indistinct chatter]

[laughter]

>> thank you, everyone. thank you for your confidence or -- thank you for your confidence and as chair, i'll strive for clarity and brevity and this is

an inaugural commission for us so we can carve out things to make this city better and cleaner. with that being said, we'll move to item 5, secretary fuller, please read the item. >> item 5 is the adoption of the streets and sanitation commission regular calendar of meetings. the staff report resolution and attached calendar of regular meeting dates was distributed to the commission and published for the public to review. meetings on this calendar can be rescheduled or cancelled and special meetings can be added with adequate notice to commissioners and the public. following the final study and learn meeting of this commission on thursday, september 22nd, regular meetings will normally be held on the third mondays of the month, with

the exception of january, february and june when a national holiday fall on that day and meetings were scheduled to alternative monday dates. as -- i would like to note, as one of the newest commissions using city hall hearing room, availability was limited and i would like to thank the department staff and city hall building management for finding consensus meeting times for these meetings and at times where the public would be able to participate as well. and also, wanting to note that the -- i believe in the staff report for the january and february meeting that those -- while they will -- for january meeting, it

would be the budget hearing and the february meeting would be the budget vote, those meetings will also include regular items, so those are not exclusively budget meetings but a lot of the content will contain the budget. and i'm happy to take questions about this calendar or suggestions. >> are there any questions? i do -- i make a motion to adopt the calendar of regular meetings of the streets and or sanitation and streets commission. >> i'll second that. >> okay. >> chair mogannam motions to adopt and commissioner harrison

seconds. a motion to adopt the regular calendar of meetings for the sanitation and streets commission. we'll need to move to public comment given the motion, so.... members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment on item no. five, the adoption of the regular meeting calendar, if here in person in the hearing room, line up furthest from the door. if calling from outside of the hearing room, the number is

415-655-0001 and the meeting access number is 24867157568. followed by pound and then pound again. and then you'll need to press star three on your touch pad to raise your hand to speak. it appears there are no members of the public who have expressed interest in speaking here in person. sf gov tv, do we have callers in the queue? there are no members of the public who have expressed interest in speaking in the teleconference queue either. so, that concludes public comment on this item.

>> if i'm not mistaken, is there any debate on this motion? seeing none. hearing no further debate, secretary fuller, please call the roll on this motion. >> on the motion to adopt item 5, the calendar of regular meetings of the sanitation and streets commission, please answer with yes or no. commissioner harrison? >> yes. >> harrison votes yes. >> commissioner hartwig-schulman? >> yes. >> hartwig-schulman votes yes. commissioner kwon? >> yes. >> pardon me, vice-chair kwon. chair mogannam? >> yes. >> commissioner simi? >> yes. >> okay. and just to note that commissioners kwon, mogannam and simi all voted in the affirmative. that brings us to five votes in the affirmative.

>> the motion to receive. secretary fuller, please publish the calendar of the regular meetings of the commission website and [gavel] secretary fuller, please call the next item. >> item 6 is the adoption of findings under the state urgency legislation. consideration of action to allow hybrid in-person meetings during the covid-19 emergency, adopt finding under california government code 54953(e) to allow remote meetings during covid-19 emergency, continue remote meetings for the next 30 days, and direct the commission secretary to schedule a similar resolution at a commission meeting within the next 30 days.

this resolution was distributed to the commission and published for the public to review, adoption of it will allow hybrid meetings for the next 30 days and you'll need -- and assume the resolution will need to be adopted regularly at this commissions monthly meeting. i'm happy to take any questions about this resolution. >> are there any questions about the resolution to allow for our hybrid meetings? yes, i have one. can this be under a regular consent calendar in the future? >> that's an excellent question. i think it has been brought up as -- i've heard that question previously. deputy city attorney taylor is with us. >> i can double check on that but i believe it has to be its own item. >> thank you. hearing no further

questions, do i hear a motion to adopt -- >> oh, wait. >> oh, i'm so sorry. commissioner simi. >> a question for the city attorney, is there a possibility to adopt it for more than 30 days at a time. maybe 60 or 90? >> no, there's not. >> hearing no further questions, do i hear a motion to adopt the resolution? >> so moved. >> seconded by commissioner harrison. given the motion -- yeah, given the motion, we'll hear public comment. secretary fuller, please open up the public comment. >> okay. and i apologize. i know commissioner harrison seconded it. who made the initial motion? >> i believe i did.

>> chair mogannam, okay. >> that's the way i understood it. >> okay. commissioner kwon or vice-chair kwon? okay. commissioner mogannam made the motion and commissioner harrison seconded it the motion to adopt this resolution of findings. members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment on item 6, the adoption of findings under state urgency legislation to allow hybrid meetings, in person or the hearing room may line up -- line up furthest from the door or if you're calling in, you can dial 45-655-0001 and the access code is 24867157568 followed by pound and pound again and to raise your hand to speak, please press

star 3. it appears there are no members of the public physically present who want to speak on this item. sf gov tv, do we have callers in the queue who expressed interest? there are -- i'm getting a message there are no callers in the queue. that concludes public comment on this item. >> is there any further debate on this motion? hearing no further debate, secretary fuller, please call the roll on this motion. >> on the motion to adopt item 6, the adoption of findings under the state urgency legislation to allow hybrid meetings, please answer with yes or no. commissioner harrison? >> yes. >> harrison votes yes.

commissioner hartwig-schulman? >> yes. >> hartwig-schulman votes yes. commissioner kwon? >> yes. >> commissioner, vice-chair kwon votes yes. chair mogannam? >> yes. >> chair mogannam votes yes. commissioner simi? >> yes. >> simi votes yes. there are five votes in the affirmative on this matter. >> the motion succeeds. secretary fuller, please publish the resolution on the commission website. [gavel] secretary fuller, please call the next item. >> item 7 is the adoption of minutes from the july 28, 2022, meeting held concurrently with the public works commission. these minutes were distributed to the commission and were published for public review. i'm happy to take questions or hear corrections to the minutes. >> are there any questions about

the minutes for corrections? >> no. >> hearing no further questions or corrections, do i hear a motion to adopt the minutes? >> i will move to adopt. >> harrison motions to adopt. >> second. >> harrison motions to adopt. hartwig-schulman motions to or seconds to adopt minutes from the july 28, 2022, sanitation and streets meeting held concurrently with the public works commission. >> given the motion, we'll hear public comment. secretary fuller, please open up to public comment. >> thank you. members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment on this item 7, the adoption of the minutes from the july 28th meeting may, if you're here in person, line up against the wall furthest from the door and if you're

calling in, dial 415-655-0001. and the meeting access number is 24867157568. followed by pound and pound again and you would raise your hand by dialing star three on your touch pad. there are no members, no members of the public who are present today who have expressed interest on speaking on this item. sf gov tv, do we have callers in the queue for this item? i'm getting a message that there are no callers on this item. so that concludes public comment on this item. >> are there any further debate or any debate? hearing no

further debate, secretary fuller, please call the roll on the motion. >> on the motion to adopt item 7, the minutes from the july 28, 2022, meeting, please answer with yes or no. commissioner harrison? >> yes. >> harrison votes yes. commissioner hartwig-schulman? >> yes. >> hartwig-schulman votes yes. vice-chair kwon? >> yes. >> kwon votes yes. chair mogannam? >> yes. >> mogannam votes yes. commissioner simi? >> yes. >> simi votes yes. there are five votes in the affirmative. >> the motion succeeds. secretary fuller, please publish the minutes to the commissions website. we will now move on to item no. 8. mr. fuller, please call item. >> okay. so members of the

public may address the commission on topics that are within the subject matter of the commission but are not part of this agenda. comments specific to an item on the agenda may be heard when that item is considered. members of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. general public comment may be continued to the end of the agenda if speakers exceed 15 minutes of general public comment. for item 8 for general public comment. members of the public who wish to make three minutes of general public comment may line up against the wall furthest from the door if you're in the chambers. if you're calling in, dial 415-655-0001. the meeting number access code is 24867157568. followed by pound and pound again. and to raise your hand, please dial star three to speak. seeing no

members of the public who are physically present to and expressed interest in speaking on this item, we'll turn to members of the public who are calling in. sf gov tv, do we have any callers for this item? there are no callers who have expressed interest in speaking on this item. so, with no further speakers, public comment has concluded. >> that concludes general public comment. [gavel] secretary fuller, please call the next item. >> item 9 is the overview of sanitation and the -- the

sanitation and streets department contract presented by alex burnes from the public works contracted administration. this is an informational item. >> good morning, commissioners. my name is alex burn and i'm the manager of the contract administration division at public works currently. i have ten years plus experience at public work in contract works administration and currently we have a team of 7 professional contract analysts. some of our main duties including taking procurement ask contracts to life cycle to ensure they meet city requirements and i think the initial goal, i'm trying to get to is -- the presentation is a broad understanding of the laws that govern or procurement in contracting in the city of san francisco. there's

additional meetings to be set up in the future. i know there's one scheduled already for september and as desired, there can be more personalized meetings as well. one-on-one for some of the complexities of the contracting and procurement rules in san francisco. so, just broadly, currently at public works, the legislation can govern from the creation of a new fire station or hospital down (indiscernible) that's needed by staff to complete their work. so san francisco's is a charter city and it establishes its own charter and own code that governs, that has its own rules and regulations. so, today, i plan to go over some of the prevalent codes in the administrative code under the san francisco charter thacht

incles