hi. everyone. it is working. >> okay. on a beautiful, rainy day gathered here to talk about public utility's commission items we have in front of us today. madam secretary, please call the first item >> roll call. >> ajami. >> hee >> vice president maxwell >> aye. >> paulson. >> here >> commissioner rivera. >> here >> commissioner stacy.

>> here >> due to the healing emergency and the recommendations issued by the san francisco d. public health and the emergency order the governor and mayor concerning social distancing and lifting restrictions on teleconference this meeting is via teleconference and televised by sfgovtv. be aware well is a time lapse with the live meeting and what is viewod sfgov.org. thank you to sfgovtv staff for assistance. if you wish to comment dial 415-655-0001 then access code: 2487 556 5294 ## press star 3 to speak. you must limit your comment to the topic discussed unless under general public comment. chair can interrupt and ask to

you stick to the agenda item. be respect and will refrain from profanity. address remarks to the commission as a whole and not individuals. >> the first item of i would like to announce san francisco public utilities acknowledges stewards of the lands within the historic territory tribes mission sand hoseef alameda county and recognizes every citizen residing within the greater bay area has and continues to benefit from the use and occupation of the tribe, lands. before and after the san francisco puc founding in 1932. it important we not only rescue noise the history of the tribal

land but also acknowledge and honor the fact that the people have established a working partnership with the puc and productive and flourishing member in the greater san francisco bay area communities today. call the first item. >> item 3, adopt fining in state emergency legislation to allow hybrid/in person meeting and direct the second to agendize a resolution at a meeting within the next 30 days. have public common law. member who is wish to comment on item 3 press story 3 to speak. anyone present to provide comment on this item? do we have callers with hands raised for item 3? there is one caller in the queue

>> this is for item 3. >> thank you. chair ajam sxhe commissioners i'm bari nelson i'm call nothing to introduce myself and our coalition. mr. hillson this is for item 3 adoption of state legislation. i thought i heard said public comment i will wait. thank you. there are no more callers in the queue. >> public comment on item low is closed. can i have a motion and second? move to approve. >> second. >> please call the role.

>> president ajami. >> aye >> maxwell. >> aye >> paulson. >> aye. >> rivera. >> aye. >> commissioner stacy. >> aye. >> you have 5 aye's. >> item passes and please call the next item. >> item 4 approval of the minutes of the special meeting of october 24 of 22. any comments? on the minutes? can we have public comment? members whether wish to comment on item 4 approval of the minutes press star 3 to speak. do we have members present who wish to comment on item 4? do we have callers with hands raised? >> there is one caller in the queue. i opened your line you have 2 minutes. >> can you hear me okay? loud and clear.

excellent. david pillpel i was unable to reach the commission secretary this morningil share with her minor edits after the meeting or tomorrow on 5 page. i think given the public comment at the last meeting and the technical, she did a fine job of sum rising what happened. good minutes and i will share the edits shortly. thank you. there are no more callers in the queue >> public comment on item 4 is closed. >> can i have a motion and second. >> moved. >> second. joof take the call of the roll >> president ajami. >> aye >> vice president maxwell. >> aye. >> commissioner paulson. >> aye >> rivera. >> aye. >> commissioner stacy. >> aye. >> 5 aye's.

>> item passes and madam secretary call the next item. >> next is 5 general public comment. member who is wish to make 2 minutes of general public comment on matters in the jurisdiction but not on the agenda today press star 3 to raise your hand. do we have members present to provide general public comment? do we have callers with hands raised? >> there are 5 callers in the queue. i opened your line you have 2 minutes. >> sounds good. david pillpel. 5 upon points. following up on a comment that i made at the last meeting i understand and see from the calendared item list is new puc letterhead. next, i enjoyed the revenue bond

committee tour of the ocean side treatment plant last friday morning and i have not been there in awhile. new building with recycled water facility. i did not visit but will in the future. tour was great. next, i was not able to give public comment at the end of the last meeting on items 16, 17 and 18 but would not have changed the outcome and its fine. next i note the apparent water main break yesterday at union and fillmore. the quick repair work by proved despite the difficult work environment and the weather. and i note the over night and expected upon rainfall which is good on the water side and the affect on wastewater plants and process as well. ch that's all i very much

vehicle. thank you. next caller, you have 2 minutes. >>ed upon commissioners i would like to talk about huge development by lake merced and other huge developments in the city that are planned. without redoing an upon sound need's assessment. we talk about conversation and yet we think we can provide sewer and clean drinking water to over 6-7,000 new units.

and lake merced. where you are planning build 3,000 new units already over 1, 100 units are empty and have been. the general manager and the commission. and we have to be mindful [inaudible] that we are not upgrading our existing clean water pipes. thank you very much.

thank you. i would like to thank staff for gracious ness and professionalism during the november fourth tour of the ocean side treatment facility. the existing infrastructure is partner low built beneath the zoo rec and park land and [inaudible] national guard facility on federal land this indicates a number of jurisdictional, have been worked out. the new water facility on 3 levels at the ocean side. they indicate that the site is fully built out. this begs the questions, what future puc expansion under the site of the former pool on rec

and park land. extends 4 and a half mile in thes pacific and partial low within the monterey bay sanctuary bound easier. this seems to indicate that the jurisdictional issue has been work the out. this begs the question how this would play you out with a new golden gate sanctuary and the ocean beach and the eccollusion area on the monterey bay sanctuary? thank you. >> thank you. next caller you have 2 minutes. >> thank you. i'm dave warner, thank you for you were service. wait to thank you for item 7c. a topic not examined closely are

water rates our wholesale rates are the highest in the state of major water supplier. 2, projected to increase 50% in the next 10 years. i'm not certain but as commissioners you should know how water rates compare to other agencies and where they will be 10 years from now. ask staff to update you on water rates the update should cover, how they compared to other major supply nears california. where are water rates 10iers from now and what assumptions are they based on. how different levels of demand affect the water rate sns the bonds affect the water rates how far in the future. this point could be the own agenda item. 5, how funding for alternate water splice affect the rates. all these seem important

knowledge fundamential to issues and decisions water rateos a steep path. that can affect how we play for water splice. paid off the next decade funt for additional funding. rused demand causes water to go up more should we understand that relationship. the length of design affected supply planning affects water rates this should be understood. consider asking staff to address these items if you don't know the answers i don't the thank you. >> next caller? >> this is bari nelson. apologize for jumping the gun earlier. i am calling immediately during

general public comment and then later on 7c to welcome commissioner stacy to the commission. association is in san francisco. we represent the california salmon fishing community. that community is facing growing challenges because our salmon runs you will hear today are in trouble. that is per of a larger crisis facing the ecosystem in rivers. our groups and our alis are doing work to address that. the issues are a major part of that. and the last several years we appeared before the puc many times to talk about the ecosystem protection and science. we also have been work to ensure that the puc has reliable water splice. commissioner stays, welcome we look forward to working with and you you will hear from a number

of us later today on item 7c. thank you. >> public comment is closed. >> thank you. please, call the next item >> item 6, communications. >> any comments about the communication provided by the staff? i want to thank everybody for information i appreciated reading the reports provided by the power side on solar panels and and -- demand and supply for the balance you are dealing watch i appreciate that. thank you very much. and -- do we need? public comment?

thank you. >> members of public when wish to make comment on item 6 communications press star 3 to speak. do we have members present to provide comment on item 6? mr. moderator do we have callers for item 6? there is one caller in the queue. great. daved pillpel a brief comment on 6c related at a previous meeting i was concerned from reports from the board of supervisors provided to the commission that was an among late this report was the next available commission meeting which is today i appreciate the time liness of the copy of communications to the commission. that's all. thank you very much.

thank you. there are no more callers in the queue >> public comment is closed. >> please call the next item >> item 7 report of the general manager. >> thank you, item 7 aa commission update from steve ritchie. good afternoon steve rich hope the microphone is coming through limp i will provide the drought condition update that i do including that is happening in the last day or so.

>> our reservoir storage is -- has not changed much. at this point we are not seeing a lot of run off now. the hempy storage is about 73% normal for this time year. water bank is down 45% that is the one concerning item on the slide. upon the other california residence wires again the project residence virus in the central valley project, shasta and orville are 31%. folsom 31st % capacity. throughout california the water projects are short on storage this is of concern to the state

for sure. california draught monitor this picture has not changes. may be tell change next week when we seat results of the starm coming through. this was prepared the line is flat on the woman. 2 inches of rain that is good and an inch of rain at the higher could you want real is a foot of snow. october was dismal. the ends of the day the sick station index is about 2 and a

quarter inches. so -- the first week of november and already about 2 thirds of the way to normal for this time of year. i don't have updated numbers i will speak from my house in oak land rang at midnight last night and did not stop until noon today. we got a shot in the arm from this storm. on the snow pack front a foot or 2 at high elevations the snow level down to 4,000 feet about hetch hetchy. no paths are closed for traffic well is a winter storm warning out snow throughout the sierra this storm is covering all the way from chico to bakersfield a

good shot for the state over all. >> water available to the city we see there is little. coming in october from the storm we will see more in the system. and as a result of this the state board last week suspend curtailments on river diversions, we are able to divert water again. there is water in the streams. last year, in october they started the suspendd and did in the reinstate them until some time earlier this spring i believe it was. we will see how it goes. but if the stream flow continuous curtailments will stay suspended that's the way it worked last year. the precipitation forecast shows last week and the concern week

definitely a lot of activity. nice red and orange colors in california which is when we have been missing for a long time the week after not much. for now we are benefitting from the storms. and lastly, the slide is the most important out of these. is in the demand of the total deliveries. this shoes 1 quick million gallons per day this is tracking close to 2015. i just sought latest from last friday and dropped down to 171 million dollars this week. tracking close low to 2015. we are doing as well as the last drought overnight last 10 weeks or so. that has been a good sievenl degree below 2020 and way below

2013. those are good signs. again, look to next year, we'll see where we are you know make november early december and start talking in early january about what do we do next for seeing precipitation that will be good. if not talking with our wholesalers about alternatives to manage our supply the coming year. happy to answer questions. >> any questions? is there any way in the slide that we showed the precipitation, month low versus average. is there a way to have a bar chart that are shows from 2,000 to now i wonder how they the patterns are changing or at all. would that be possible. >> we can show different things.

i just saw very interesting data yesterday that for the 3 month period i believe it was january through march. if you look at 2021. lowest 3 mont in that period then and there we had before. it was by a lot. little precipitation. that is the data we will share more showing that things are changing >> right and seat bars and how the trendses are month to month. again thshg is one data point, one way of showing it but good on have it. >> another graph showed how we assess probability of what will happen. we have our period of record and

one there was 2021, off the chart. other end 2017, off the chart. extreme what is we are seeing. >> the bars would be great, too. we will see wa we can do. it may take work but we can do things. thank you. >> one question mr. ritchie. i don't know if i saw this yesterday or this morning. . yesterday in the l.a. times or chronicle or a mass piece that was in the public but some anecdote someone said we saved 20 billion gallons. i forgot if you saw it. how would that be interpreted to a commissioner or someone watching. >> the l.a. times i saw before i came here and i think it was 6 billion gallons.

billions of gallons when you talk about a large service area that's what they had to do in north western los angeles. they had to comfortable a lot. for our system this year as a whole i believe the number is 3 billion gallons we saved during this time period. people are saving a lot of water in total. >> could have been a brag piece for l.a. they were hit hard y. they had a 35% reduction and people responded. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> okay. okay. . members who wish to make comment on 7 athe drought commission update press star 3 to speak.

do we have anyone present to provide comment on 7a? well is one caller wish to be recognized. your line is open you have 2 minutes. >> commissioners, it would be nice [inaudible] for us to invite the local tribes from the region to give their comment on the situation at hand. and also photographs of the river. >> for thousands of years the prize result protected the

rivers. we talk about the salmon. and we don't do that. & who is the ordinance of 23,000 years referring to the tribes and give honor to the salmon. if not we'll fall flat on our face. kilt land and water. talk about how much we saved but we don't follow the act. when you follow the act. you should see who is useings the water. all we care about is telling the water to the highest bidder. thank you. thank you for your comments.

>> there are no more callers in the queue. public comment is closed. item 8 perform review report i like to take into account opportunity to many of you seen nancy hahns the department cfo for the agency we were proud over the summer promoted her to the cfo for business services and happy that she agreed to take the job! and i know that for all of that you had the opportunity to deal with her you have seen professional willism. that's hai think impressed me and the panel. in during the interview process. we're happy to have nancy in the new position i will let her say a few words and introduce our

next presentser. >> thank you for the kind words. i started 3 months ago. i served in the city for 18 years with the controller and then child support office. i look forward to working with you. and if you have questions you are woman to contact me. the audit director for the quarter low audit and performance review report.

some of you worked with her in her new position. we are lucko have her as a newarkdition to our executive team and for those of you who don't know her i will let her share about her background she serving in the position in city government inspect different agencies we are luck tow have her here as well and has the best laugh, too. always has good humor and professional. >> thank you. welcome commissioner stacy and rivera. audit director for the sfpuc i started in the city 12 years ago in controller's office as a part of city service auditor manager. from there befwan on go to the tax collector's office the chief

auditor there and also at the mta a grant's ash counting manager. thank you for having me today. i'm here to present the audit updates. in the first quarter 4 audits 14 percent completed. 15 or 54% for the year are in progress and 9or 32% of the audit in thes portfolio are upcoming. >> for the audits that were issued for first quarter they included the post audit by office of controller on august first. and the sfpuc audit physical inventory about the p you c finance team on september 7 of 22. covered water, wastewater and

hetch hetchy. bureau is monitoring open audit recommendations throughout the agency to ensurety recommendations are on track to be addressd and implemented by the deadlines. currently, of the 7 total recommendations issued for social impact program remain open external, fairs is addressing. 3 of those recommendations have been implementd and closed by office controller city service auditor. the 2 recommendations for revenue fwounlds audit on track and the audit bruro in communication on the recommendations. >> the out look for audits complete instead second quarter includes the 2021. 22, fiscal year audit and

financial statements. the franchise fee audit pg and e and energy center for limited liability company. 2020-21 fiscal year wholesale revenue requirement with changes in balancing ash count. 2021-22 fiscal year annual comprehensive financial report. upon 21 and 22 fiscal popular financial report. sue are system contract audit for 165 and information technology operational technology network audit. >> the 2020 through 22 california independent system operator scheduling coordinator audit for hetch hetchy and the revenue lease audit for crystal

springs. san francisco puc revenue bond program audit phase 2. the statement changes approximate balancing account and the 22 through 23 fiscal year connections security agreement. as well as the management cyber security assessment. i'm available for questions thank you very much. welcome to both of you. wonderful to have you. comments or questions? >> i wanted to welcome both of you and we are quite fortunate to have an everaccomplished people working for us.

thank you very much for coming over. great to have a positive attitude. great to have people who laugh and bring brightness to the day. so. >> okay. can we have public comment. >> mechanic who is wish to comment on item 7 b the audit report. press star 3 to speak. do we have callers with hands raised? >> there is one caller in the queue. >> i opened your line you have 2 minutes. >> commissioners, i would like to see the audit report on the building 1515 evans. and like to see twhan audit the

final audit. this is what we do. rejoice we get new employees. upon comment on the demeanor, that's fine. but i would like to see a final audit on the building 1550, who signod it. after quality control was done? thank you very much. >> thank you. there are no more callers in the queue. >> thank you. public comment on 7 b is closed. >> 7d report on san francisco puc commission activities. and it is a brief thing i wanted -- do we have 7c?

>> apologies the river background and you want. bill spaers the present. >> good afternoon commissioners. i'm phil serious a policy analyst with national resource at the sfpuc. today i will present on biology for you. on salmon on the river and look at the statement the number of adult fish coming and history and challenges.

tuolumne in the upon spring they are on higher flows usually the snow melt flows from the river. >> after that time they are migrating spend 2-4 years at sea and come back as adults. >> what is the statement? literally adult fish escaping harvest and mortality to arrive back in the river as adults.

to look at this mathematically the number of juveniles that go out in spring and subtracting mortality they are experiencing and harvest they experience you have lower tuolumne the san joaquin, big delta ocean mortality. harvest in ocean and fresh water environment and prespawn that die before they are able to spawn that gets you the natural fall run escapement. this it is not include escapement from hatchery fish in the system from other river systems and hatcheries, cow do we know what is happening with the fish on the tuolumne. there are 2 ways we monitor the population on the tuolumne river. adults counted on their way in. there is a spot that indicates the low are tuolumne river adult count thanksgiving is where they

count adults coming in. and 2 locations on the river, they track juveniles in the spring headed out of the river. theful 2 traps serve the give us the total number of juveniles headed out and more talitity and understand that is happening between the 2 traps. how is this looking so far this fall? here is a plot showing passage at the rear. and this year is in black. might be difficult to see there but so this is indicating we got low escapement. low numbers compared to recent years. when i put this together a week ago we were on parwith last year. and updates from yesterday have us escape am at 356 pish puts us

on parwith purple line of 2020. tuolumne run declining over democracied. this is the plot of escapement from -- apologize for the tiny numbers from 1952-2021. the populations gone through cycles in the past more and less fish. you see that were they don't get a break over time. there is a series of droughts. ocean fisheries collapse closed the fishery in 2008 and 9. a company bright spots the wetter years in the past tended to produce higher numbers of fish and the settle am agreement the ssa that was implemented in 98 resulting in higher flows on

the river. the spring flow escapement is broken down in the past you have a lot of adults coming back that has not worked for the last 15 years. used to be this clear relationship but does not seem to be working. escapement again like the last slide. spring flows over it 2 natural years later that shoes the break down in the last 3 peeks to the right. what are the factors to low escapements? one is that juveniles don't survive their trip. ow migrating to the ocean. they don't make it typically. also the tuolumne escapement is hatchery fish. not fish from the tuolumne. and due to the hatchery strays

we lost the natural adapted population the natural population, it it is gone. and one other factor that hatchery fish that are spawning in the river and have juveniles coming out of the river, than i have low are productivity in general than natural fish would. one problem is that the commercial and recerational harvest does not distinguish. so -- the natural fish are captured and that is rudzing the population. and just for context the commercial harvest for fall run schnook over 2014 to 18 is 53% and 68% of the adult population. we had drought. ocean collapsed. in dry years, we have nonnative

invasive plants that blocks passage in the san joaquin and tuolumne river. okay. so haare we doing about it? the sfpuc per to the voluntary agreement. and it contains measures that are designed to increase productive tit and surverify in the river for juveniles. habitat restoration that is on going. flood plain rearing flows. larger spring pulse flows. and there is a pervasion suppression component should increase survival. but continuing is important to note the strays will under mine our efforts despite all the additional work because they are continuing to degrade the natural population of the

tuolumne river. so -- to mention where the hatcheries are. there are 5 am 4 are operated in by california fish and wildlife one by the united states fish and wildlife and throughout the central valfresouth to north there. moving on. what is next in december and january we will have updates on escapement. and moving into upon winter and early spring, we will have updates on the juveniles headed out of the river and the counts of fish we have. turn toing the upper tuolumne river, we will provide you wuchts on upper tuolumne river ecosystem program. and provide updates on spring ecosystem management releases from the damn we doll that in

march and follow up in september. and that's all i have for you today. >> happy to answer questions. >> thank you. >> go ahead. >> vice president maxwell. how dot hatchery strays degrade and the natural. how does that snap intergregz gregz it is traits. you have fish in the hatchery population they are not adapted anything they are adapted to the hatchery environment. those fish breed with the natural fish that are more adapted a dilution to say it simply the genetics that are present in the natural fish when you do that over generations, you ends up with a single

homogenized genetic strain. >> did you mean to do that? was that done on purpose? somebody not know it would happen like, oops? >> there is a long history to that i'm happy to explain it briefly upon so -- the production hatch easier the d. fish and wildlife hatch easier were established make up for losses due to building of damns and gold mining. so they were meant to make up for that lost population. over time, as conscience degraded in the bay delta and in the tributaries, they had to release the hatchery fish away from the hatch easier. if you release the fish a juvenile fish at the harshary

testimony come back if it was able to travel down the river it is unable to revolve and releases far from the tributary they are strays because they go other places. did we mean to do it? i think it was a primary effort of trying to bolster the population to have a population. the trade off with that is that we have the homogenized population of fall run and could be part why we see the decline in populations. >> thank you. >> i think you will flush it out in a further report but did a point of time and -- and indicated spring flows can you

flush that out what a spring pulse flow is. so -- approximate the life cycle. spring flows function to move juvenile fish out of the river. they can ride that flow out and it is a natural phenomenon. a pulse flow is meant to mimic that and a half pulse flow in the snow note push this out in the spring. and past for water conscience. and other issues that might result in mortality. >> this is what is happens naturally you are adding the release piece? >> on the low are tuolumne

river. don pedro does not spill as often at hetch hetchy. they were intentional the reservoir is large it holds most of the water coming inform they are intentional releases. turning valves to turn up the water moving fish out. >> thank you. >> i have a few questions. on the slide that you had. with the escapement the number. i noticed there is like a shift in time. you have between 2016 special 22 i don't know if somebody can fwlang slide up. i noticed you have gone from september 16 to like the you --

october first to october like 16 and 17th. is that something that -- is that they like if you look at historical data would we see the shift happening related to later -- rain events you are saying. >> climatic patterns >> we don't know. everybody year is slightly different sometimes when they put county we are in they take it in and out every year. sometimes conscience don't it in there if there are high flows they hold back until they come down a bit. well is inform variation when adid you tell us come back usually within a 2 week to month performed might be delays due to flow or hi sing and post flows

in the fall now. those are meant to help with the conscience special improve them so fish with move through the rivers there are no blockages. i don't know what is happening there. >> and then as you are looking at the next slide i was looking -- you have okay i'm going to come back to this. we have you are talking about the difference with hatchery and natural fish. i wonder if you have statistics on do we know, how easy to recognize between the 2. and then -- how do we know what percentage are will natural and

what are stray. if they are sort of mixing eventually at that point you are losing that natural gene quickly etch >> natural adult looks the same as a hatchery fish except the california department of fish and wildlife mark 25% of the hatchery fish they release that mark is cut the adipose fin a visual thing and tag in their bodies you scan. so, the counting on the tuolumne has a camera on it that takes an image of each fish you can tell which is marked. the cut fin and is not. we know how much marked fish come through but not how much

hatchery fish. we do statistics later to figure out capture and figure out how much fitch were showing up. use the tags. ja this is a guess based from math equation? do you know what [inaudible]. high. so and they vary by year and there are error embarrass. they can be i don't have specific years but you know between 50% and 100% are estimates. and may be the last 5 years. we can provide you with when we have. california department of fish and wildlife their analysis of hatchery strays going to upon

different strolls that work is delayed by 5-10 years. we don't have up to the minute information or annual information on how much hatchery fish are showing up in streams. so that the knowledge the understanding. hatchery is limited. . there have been proposals and i think we have been advocates of this. to do 100% marking instead of 25% to count them in real time of is it hard to do. >> labor intensive. they have machines now that can do some of that work. it is expensive. >> is there a way that they can introduce biodiversity in the fish in the hatch easier. >> yes. there are recommendations from a group hatchery scientific review

group. are a panel tasked with how to improve the hatchery stock in the central valley. one of the recommendations was 100% marking and to reduce the amount of off site releases they do to reduce the straying. the hatch easier have been implementing some of the things.

thez rt fish hago to the san joaquin river and travel to the tuolumne. i of course this it is a good point the coupling is happening if you i mean the hatchery process did not start yesterday. it hen going on for a long time. >> true. >> it is like there needs to be another thing driving this decoupling. beyond just hatchery fish. if we go back here there are many factors. out planning of hatchery fish degone in the 80s in that time frame. a few decades ago and a good

point. what i see looking at this plot here is that we had several droughts and it seems to increase. we have this ocean fishery collapse. the problem where the timing of juveniles headed out to the organization does not line up with food availability and conditions in the ocean were porfor the fish in that year of 2008. and as a result, the cohort of fish that did not make it to adult hood. hatch easier were functioning. we had more fish to release. but what i think happened there probably is that any natural fish this remained were probably wiped out and left with the hatchery population of adults in the ocean and i think that what we see for the tuolumne is that

we are seeing small are response. to all of the anything done because we dot the hatchery population not linked to conditions on the tuolumne and are not adopted to the tuolumne river. or merced river or any of the -- i like what you mentioned there i was wondering if there is did thea that shows that -- that ocean fishery collapse lead to more hatchery fish coming become that way we can test that and see if that is the case there. at some point we have to put the pieces together and figure out what works. obviously flow is important. now, yes well is a level of decoupling happening we need to look at other things in addition to the flow. we need to know what is it that

matters. that can help us. i'm about trying to prevent more you know greater collapse of speesh ease the question is, is that the way to go or xhg something else we can do. and i'm very curious i would love to see what happened in the 2008 or 9. sort of across california coast this happened. just in the bay area or you know -- delta and golden gate area that we. central valley or the river meet the ocean right. in the san francisco bay. so like i'm curious to know how was this how we can sort of take

the piece out and better understand what is going of otherwise, we are like you know having all of the hypotheses we have no way of proving and throwing money at things that may not work or commit to thing this is may not be helpful. we are community committed to the environment we want to survive. we'll provide you more information what happened in 2008 and 9 time frame and happy to provide you with other information you need. you know the voluntary agreement does focus the in river things we see that could be improved. those are things that improve productivity and the modeling by

districts shown that should increase productivity. increase on the tuolumne river does not mean the fish will make it we don't have control in the bay delta or the ocean. does not mean we will get more fish back. we can do things in the tuolumne river and that's when we are focussed on. there are other things like the hatchery issue outside of our influence that -- could be using to have improvements. >> we need a holistic approach. broad are than counting fish or trying to make sure we have all the right tools to help us to protect the fish you are sort of meeting the reliability required meet and all that. >> yes. >> thank you. >> sorry. >> could you give me an example

of the genetic management plan? >> that's trying to bring more diversity genetic diversity into a spawning program they have admit hatchery. so you are not pick the same fish from year to year you are increasing the genetic diversity. >> would that have anything to do getting fish from the tuolumne or from certain strolls that would have that genetic 8 to go back? >> it could. . i don't know if that's what happens bringing fish in from other treatments could increase. i could provide this i have to look how they are implementing the plans. and then contributing factors says one was nonnative invasive

plants. block adult migration during dry years. could you flush that out. >> well is a plant if you have a pond you bought it for your koi. it is an invasive plant. it grow in in mats the mats can span the entire river after several years they have not upon been flushed out by high flows. they're grow. the plants die and new grow and create this deep mat of vegetation that creates block ajs or premesis courage fish from coming through. they are 19move some out did snot sd not always do that. thank you very much is a problem on the river and the san joaquin

river down stream. >> thank you. >> are there hatch easier out in the world that are dealing with this am. >> yea. >> columbia river is another example of where they had hatchery issues. that are similar. >> they have solutions they have tested and it works? >> same problems some of the same we face. scale of central valley is significant. it it is a universal problem well is a conversation hatchery that are is tightly managed they

have small production for coho salmon but they are hard to scale up they take the genetic management and raise it to a high level and breed in natural fish to keep know genetics diverse >> in europe? kwloo i don't know what is happen nothing europe inform the east clove is atlanta salmon there have been attempts but it is a universal problem in terms of diluting the genetics. in terms of and hatch easier are a double edged sword you produce a lot of fish but in order to do that they will be homogenized.

you take 2 fish use their eggs and you produce all the young from them and that's not diverse. >> thank you. >> yes, go ahead. had a quick question is there a mitigation program until accomplice for the plant that seems like it is blooming all over the rivers? obvious that is manage we can do immediately. to happen help the saul movenl california boating and water ways addresses issues with boats trying to get through the rivers. that is i problem in the stockton shipping channel they have been active well and the san joaquin electronaries in the past. efforts involve manual removal they drag them up on the combarj

take it away. involves spraying to kilt pleasants they usual low do both. i know california boating way system involved in changing the way they operate. bringing on contractor to increase capacity. so i know upon irrigation directs are working on this issue. i could give you moror that i am not close to that issue. >> thank you. can we have public comment, please. members who wish to make 2 minutes of comment on 7c. press star 3 to speak. do we have member present top provide comment on 7c. do we have callers with hands

raised? there are 5 callers in the queue. your sloin open have you 2 minutes. >> commissioners, when we have a presentation given from one entity we need to invite the federal agencies. let us so what they have to say. gentlemen did not mention once about the. temperature of the river. y'all have heard it before in the workshops. none of y'all could ask the question about the temperatures in the river. and the algae. and the pesticides.

and the. sfpuc swaying sacramento. are we going to have way of addressing the solution? or are we [inaudible]. all the goobly gook about the [inaudible] give the federal agencies i will contact sdmem call the federal agencies and let's see. what the hell is happening. sfpuc should do it on the progressive side. as the commission y'all have to lead the way. good leaders know the way, go and show the way. y'all is not, commissioners. thank you very much. >> thank you.

next caller you have 2 minutes. >> hello, thank you i'm frederick [inaudible] i'm customer of the hetch hetchy water. this [inaudible] in the last 6 years shows the count guess down, down. the tuolumne fall run goes on 1952 and does not show before the 1919 to 23 building of the [inaudible] dam creating the hemp hempef river. historical salmon count higher than highest shown in that graph. the data 3 years before and to fill 2 years after the 21 year period next period was this cycle of peek and valys had an

average of 11.5,000 salmon. in the. [inaudible] conthereat had an average of 2.2,000 salmon. that's 80% decline from the initial 21 years. latest number of [inaudible] is the 99% reduction from the historical value for 40,000 salmon compared to 30,000 in 98% reduction. the salmon have [inaudible] the. [inaudible] because of the high percentage of [inaudible] salmon in the tuolumne we fear it is not take in acount 90% reduction tuolumne fish dominate. . does not make sense to destroy the salmon habitat and excuse to

not offer [inaudible] salmon. voluntary compromise is responsible and does not [inaudible] flows. >> thank you. your time is expired. . next caller, have you 2 minutes. >> thank you. bari nelson with golden state salmon. thank you for agendizing this item i hope you do ittanual and he consider doing one addressings the [inaudible] the existence of the [inaudible]. the slide you have been discussing the slide search about population on the tuolumne in relationship with flow. i want to point out that as staff admits, until recently

there is a strong connection with flows and salmon populations on the tuolumne river. in the in natural world you seldom see a clear correlation very consistent with plants and consistent with our community presentation in science workshop a year ago. the view on fish model. i point out there is no similar relationship for harshary production soing a similar relationship with impacts on salmon. hatchery production bunkham [inaudible]. what that flow population has will connection does not clear butt problem is not that we raised fishing hatcheries we are killing the wild salmon eggs and juveniles. and that is clear and i urge to

you review science. ive sent you a slide yesterday that shoes the tuolumne river has the worse record of any river in the sierra nevada because the tuolumne has the worse flows. really disturbing pattern. stead decline. . next, your time is expires. next caller? you have 2 minutes >> peter tuolumne of river trust p. prosecute a big problem with slide 6s salmon numbers. the slide use 2 data source. surveys until 2008 and the

tuolumne after. these are different counts. i looked compared them since 2009 the tuolumne counts higher than the surveyed. embarrass at the end on the right should be 2-1/2 times lower than they are. whether this was intentionally misleading or a big error. this slide needs to be corrected. i sent you a letter yesterday. can i don't know if you have read it. but the salmon have spoken. i refer become to a comment commissioner moran made bh weave had a proposal that the puc could voluntarily contribute the fills for 2 scombreers if we hit a dry year, revert become to the current base loads and you would

make it through the design drought. well is will interest on the commission and commissioner moran said i would like sto to see the salmon approximate speak. you have a restoration, chshg is good. the salmon have spokenism sent you that yesterday. in the tuolumne not the bay delta. in a wet year 265 thousand juveniles with more talitity and a dry year of upon 51,000 few are juveniles and 98% survival. i read mr. decosta hear from federal. >> thank you for your comments. your time is expired. next caller. >> i'm dave warner.

thank you upon commissioners and staff for the report and for plan to provide regular updates. thank you for the thoughtful questions and discussion. in my opinion the approximate purpose of the. periodic report is commissioners have current evidence of the state of the tuolumne ecology. how it it is begin that the environmental steward ishmael is important part of the mission and appreciate you taking time on this. as you discussed the data is bad. it is hope that was actions will be taken i deally in a time frame when you are still serving the commission. a comment all trends 16-22 are poofrm and 21 was exceptional poor. you seeept this from the shart showing salmon escapement. going to the 2016 line is not our goal.

commissioners 2 callers have joined the queue. you have 2 minutes. hi, commissioners. john mcmahon gold know gate salmon association. excellent presentation. i would love to see a follow and up agree with the point that getting different points of view in would be helpful. the point that refer temperatures were not mentioned is crucial. salmon eggs need 53.4 degrees or they die and the tuolumne is

warmer than. . to commissioner ajami's question in the year 2,000. good question watch i'd like to point to the fact that delta exports increased by 16%. starting in 2,000. between the year 2 upon dmnd 200 sick. 3 all time high water records were set. set update collapse in 08 and 9 this suspect go 2 much water taken out of the delta. love to seat commission use its influence to address this. the current v. a. proposal does not. we need more flow in the river and more flow would devolve more out flow through the delta. you saw the chart 1985 you had 40,000 adult salmon return the

river in good position but poor flow conditions, that was a 30 second warning. >> i'm sorry. anyway, the other point i like to make the business about hatch air fishery a problem that is not your problem it is a plumbing problem. >> they don't stray. of now i'm cut off. >> your time has expired. thank you for your comments. your sloin open you have 2 minutes. >> hello this is cindy charles i live in san francisco. and i'm a mfbt tuolumne river

trust. i have fished for tuolumne for steel head and trout. i have not dhan in a long time because of the fishery degraded and of course it pains me. i want tochlt hair when i was fishing well in early 2,000. i did catch salmonful i noticed that on the reporting of the juveniles of salmon on the lower tuolumne there are numbers and not much on the condition of the juveniles. when i was fishing in 2000. the salmon juveniles were will large. they looked like 5 and 6 inch trout that mean i were in robust

conscience. panging in the river longer. to enhance development before they head out to the organization. when you are looking at the juvenile salmon you don't pount the numbers you look at their positions because they are factors that -- contributing to their better condition and size so they can make it out and avoid the predators and have the wherewithal to get out to the delta. i wanted to share that. i adopt to thank you for putting the item on the agenda. the fish need more attention and i'm looking forward to future reports. thank you very much. >> thank you. there are no more callers in the

queue. >> thank you, public comment on 7c is closed. >> any other comments or questions. i -- mr. -- i d. pass fosh got to ask temperature in my list of questions for and you forgot to mention it. want are good good to have theed have the inld indicators reflecting climate change and the likearctivities like pesticides or other toxins might be an important factor. these are important to the history data it is like important. i had written i was a little --

the difference with caring us data and [inaudible] data. dast at from most of the cents roll valley. doing it for a long time. and this is a mark recapture experiment where they go out and find fish that have spawned. take their heads off and become to the lab and find the tages they are not guilty fish and category what the escapement was to the individual. the tuolumne data came on in

2008 is direct observes a small space and cam ramp well is an observer sometimes every fish gets a picture taken and counted. i consider that and many others would consider that a better source of dast it a direct observation not a statistical observation. >> that data came on finely 2008. that's why we switched. >> yea. >> thank you. >> and they are doing the caringus surveys. peter mention the the other dastast it is around typically as peter mentioned they are lower than the counts. >> i guess to your point if we had data since 19 poot number of

saul machine we seen would have been more significant. the point is they are 2 data points collected differently. one can be more accurate than the other meaning they are not the same so. there are errors in one versus the other? >> 2 ways to mfsht same. one is statistical and other is a direct observation. >> stacy go ahead. >> i wanted make comment, may be you can give us information but strikes me that not only we need the best science on all of the factors that affect the health and the numbers of fish and also seems there are so many players

who have very big influenceos what is happening. whether the health of the bay, oceans, how the fish easier are handled and managed and conduct the. how we collect the science i assume almost is a collaborative effort with the state and federal agencies as well as all of the other central valley river system. of course, we need to be if important part of that and want to be the best stewards we can be. it seems that there are so many factors and players with the health of the fish populations i'm interested to hear a bit about what collaboration is going on out there. why we are working west state on the voluntary agreements.

there are processes going o. numerous and have gone on in the pass. some failed or petered out. others have provided information into the world of fish easier management in the central valley picked up and used. often time its is very doyle get central valel effort that can globalally address the issues. because there are many players involved. upon even upon fishery agencies don't afternoon agree on things. dalta or ways to manage fish.

bring together the interests, state and central valley contractors and all the agencies and tribes, there are a lot of players. you know other comments? is this helpful?

>> i would add one the single learningest program is the ecological program focused on delta conscience driven by the state and federal agencies and the state water contractors and the central valley project contractors. they have been workoth delta upon since. 1970 clantively i put that in quoteses. great to find the smoke gun and sometimes people think they found temperature nutrients from the sacramento wastewater treatment plant. i'm in the sure what changed. they eliminated that problem. they keep on going and keep

trying different ways and -- that is the best we can do now. keep trying. >> thank you. i think >> 7 d. i wanted to a bit our last commission meeting occurred right after what was a seminal event for our agency. i failed to talk about temperature i know many of you were there the opening on october 22nd of the new southeast community center on evans. you probably read about temperature it was an absolutely beautiful facility and i think we can take provide in the opportunity it'll provide for the broad are community and programming.

and really helping the southeast sectors and the rest of the ecstasy the whole city. in terms of youth programming and opportunities. and you already for those of that you were there, right when we open that you saw we got a first market located in bayview across the street. it is having positive affects. one thing should really appreciate was the volunteer effort we had from the agency. a great deal of work done by folks in the agency but i wanted everybody to understand that it was an agency commit we had volunteer efforts not involved in manage the program. they were there on a saturday and signify the the agency commitment and excitement about

the center and -- we are happy it is there and the landscaping is beautiful. great space. sxoep airy. hopefully signifies the on going commitment to be a good partner. we are excite body t. i wanted make sure i brought that you want. thank you. >> that was great. >> really exciting. i saw that facility as it was being b. excite to see it finish exclude in operations people can use it. it is fantastic. >> can you of call the next item >> public comment on this item. member who is wish to make

remote commentom 7d press star 3 to speak. do we have anyone present to provide comment on 7d? do we have callers with hands raised. >> there are no callers. >> public comment is closed. >> next is item 8. new commission business. >> colleagues any -- new business. >> move to next item. >> next is consent. item 9. any comments questions about the items in the consent calendar. if seeing none. public comment. if you wish to make 2 minutes of

comment on item 9 the consent calendar, is there anyone present to provide comment on item 9? >> there are 2 callers. i opened your line you have 2 minutes. >> coalition for san francisco neighborhoods. regarding item 9b and 9d. i'm not requesting they be severed from consent that being said i'm requesting staff justify yet 2 contracts are inconsistent with the city's policy. will be once every 5 years and involve all work needed.

designed to min niez the needed and min niez the impacts on the neighborhoods. thank you. your line is open you have 2 minutes. >> daved pillpel. i have comments on 9b and d. do not need them severed. on item 9b i read the materials carefully. i got more from the environmental documents than from the staff report on the condition assessment. i think it is upon important for the box in the staff report. on background to have information on the back grounds of assets to be replaced or

rehabd and it does not say. constructed in the 20's does not say there was assess am and night to bes replaced or anything about that. more verbiage is needed and no discussion coordination with other projects in the area. across the street -- or of the great highway closure and the traffic impact on 46th avenue and other locations near by. i think that is missing. i i don't have a problem but that is 9bes 9d i upon found a typo in the seconded where as clause. let me go to that. on the resolution where as on

august 82011. august 8, 2022. the staff report indicates. thanks for listening. item 9 is closed. >> a comment on the 2 i wonder if doing these replacement fist we use that opportunity to digitize the location, the know the maps you are pulling how to do this. we need an opportunity to build up on our digital director real of assets. this might be one opportunity to do that. just a thought. any comments? can i have a motion and second

on this. >> so moved. >> and -- does it need to be for item from [inaudible]. resolution is 11 rather than upon 2022. we can do. 9d and resolution. okay. we have a motion and second to have a roll call for the consent. >> thank you. president ajami. >> what is the amendment you are talking about the >> commissioner paulson can you speak in the comment >> a date on the resolution. came from public comment. thank you. >> president ajami >> aye >> vice president maxwell. >> aye >> commissioner paulson.

>> aye >> commissioner rivera. >> aye. >> commissioner stacy. >> you have 5 aye's. >> item passes. thank you. can we have the next item. >> item 10 discussion and possible access amend 17 to thursday general management install am grant state rolling fund loan for the san francisco west side recycled water project i am the grants and lone manager surveying on business services team. the item is a request to authorize the general manager to

scout an amendment to the state revolveingly fund loan low any financing to the water project. this amendment would increase the upon glooent everand grant value from noot not exceed 186 million to 191 admissible and extend the financing agreement for additionaling 28 months this is one of 9 state revolving fund or srf financialsing agreements that the puc executed with the state resource control board since 2014. low interest rate loans provides a cost saving alternative to revenue borne bonds financing. the original resolution to execute the funding agreement was approved in 2017. the project budget and duration increased and those changes to the project have been approved

by the commission. this amendment would. improve the a line am with the loan agreement with the state and the schedule and budget of the project. happy to take questions you might have on that. >> colleagues comments or questions? thank you. approximate can we have public comment, please. >> member who is wish to make remote comment on item 10 press star 3 to speak. anyone present for item 10. >> there are 2 callers in the queue. you have 2 minutes to comment on item 10. >> great. dave you'd pillpel i appreciate staff for saving money. this is a complicated financing

thing. distribute that financial. as to ceqa appreciate the reference to the eir. i think this is action today ceqa under 15378 and not project approval to my way of thinking on page 7 off packet and 1, 2, 3. 4. page 3 of the resolution. would does not require any change in the wording at the ends of the last where as clause i say now therefore about it and tends and start i new paragraph in all capps and clear there is

and the clause in here somewhere. sections 1-6. which i'm sure or carefully drafted meet the state requirements for the isa and grant amendment. that's my thought on item 10. >> thank you. your line is open. you have 2 minutes. >> eileen coalition for san francisco neighborhoods. received amounts of funds being from the state from the west side recycle prvenlth on loan and grant. approximate pac sued the state and 10 the 2 actions seen at best at [inaudible] thank you.

>> there are no more callers in the knew. >> motion and second, please? >> thank you. can we have take a roll call. >> president ajami >> aye >> maxwell >> aye >> commissioner paulson. >> aye >> commissioner rivera. >> aye. >> commissioner stacy. >> you have 5 aye's. >> item passes. of next item. >> 11 authorize the general manager to request approval of a supplemental appropriation ordinance for fit calgary year 22/23 clean power sf foodservice

energy efficiency programful by the california puc from clean power sf rate payir purpose program funds the total program budget is 4, 517, 056 over 3 years. >> good afternoon i'm andrew analyst with clean power sf customer solution team. last year the commission approved the application to the puc for funding of new community foodservice energy fortunate program. california commission approved the design special asked funding. california commission action we seek approval this requires supplementation by the board of supervisors. if approved tell allow us to

spends that and begin implementing the program. clean power sf budget increased by 4, 573, 056 dollars. funsdz limited to the energy efficiency program and no funding for program is amounted. the source of the funds is the public purpose program. california commission directors utilities to collect the fundses from electric and gas customers. the california commission decides how to spends the funds. our community food service program is the first time clean power awarded funding and we are excited have that money and spends it. >> we are requesting to you authorize the general manager to

request the mayor recommend the approval of this appropriation. i'm happy to answer questions you may have. >> thank you. any comments or questions? >> that's exciting. congratulations. wonderful to see this sxhoen help us use less energy. can we have public comment. >> members of the comment who wish to comment on item 11 press star 3 to speak. do we have anyone present to comment on item 11. >> do we have callers with hands raised >> there are no callers. >> public comment on item 11 is closed. >> callers there are no questions or comments can i have a motion and second. >> so moved. >> excellent. can we have a roll call. >> commissioner paulson aye

>> rivera. aye. >> commissioner stacy. >> aye. >> item passes. >> madam secretary call the next item; award a contractor in the amount of 11, 500,000 with 30-days to v. i. p. power line co operation. of >> good afternoon. president ajami and xhfrns. deputy city manager for puc power. we are here to request for you to award the contract pw009r. electric installation and construction support contract v.

i. p. existing enter sxriez provide electric to hetch hetchy customers throughout the territory. services that need to be provide includes new customer connections to the new transmission and distribution project we are building. to the existing electrical distribution network to support the substation work we need to condition with san francisco airport as well as the new [inaudible] and also to connect the new customers to the system. the contract is approximately 11 million 5 huh thousand dollars for 2 years. and there is an lbe commitment of 6.05%. and it is the assess am of 12 million dollars for 2 years. so the -- rfp sent out on

december 23 of 21. no bids received after 4 weeks. it was readvertised again in february of 22 and no bids were received. on march 22 ndz. 22. this commission authorized the general manager to negotiate a contract with a contractor. allowed in san francisco code and negotiations with several qualified firms. v. i. p. corporation submitted a proposal that accepted the city standards terms and conditions. the price is below the estimate. and they are qualified to do the work. i ask for your support on this item 12, and i'm happy to answer questions you may have.

skwoo thank you. commissioner paulson. >> deputy manager i had questions. and feface by saying my years on the commission i have been pleased with no matter what the enterprise. this one i understand the difficulties you put the bid out twice and nobody came in. that ebbs and flows base on the economy and the job and the needs there. in this one you know despite that piece it is very skilled and important w in the city. i have a couple questions about this company. which i never heard of until i saw it today. do they have a track record of doing this work with a staff that prouven they have been able to use previously. >> yes, they do.

we interviewed them intensive low. and look at qualifications and check the reference as well they are qualified. >> i asked a specific question do they have a staff that is skilled and traind and through promise that has been part of that track reference that you went through. why we have staff -- >> am people that will do the work if needed with the team. >> we don't the challenge we have is we don't have sufficient staff to do this work. gi understand that i'm asking about v. i. p. and their ability to dot work and subelement the work that we are contracting out to make sure we are covered. >> i'm sorry i have a hard time hearing you. >> i understand that of internal low there are not enough staff to feel do what you are anticipate in this bid you are

conout but i mite my question was about v. i. p. if they have a track record of having skilled and trained that have done this work before or if they are going to wing it. am >> deeper in who this organization is and what they are bringing to the table. why they have track record they have qualified staff as far as hiring the specific staff they have not done that they are waiting for the contract to be approved. >> they don't have like a staff to do this skilled aparensises. >> not currently. not in this area. they are members of ibew1245 am they have access to 1245 members. 1245. utility. >> correct.

>> union. >> okay. >> i think you answered my questions. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> public comment on the item >> thank you very much. off this item y. member when is wish to comment on item 12 press star 3 to speak. do we have anyone present to provide upon commentom item 12? >> do we have callers with hands raised. >> tr is one caller in the queue. your line is open you have 2 minutes. >> david pillpel again inch don't want to get in the way of getting the work done. supportive. but i had a couple questions similar to commissioner paulson. does this item which appears to be a staff augmentation does

this need approval from civil service commission or prop j approval from the board of supervisors? this men a new approach or new precedent. i heard the response about the staff of this contractor being represented by local 1245. but 1245 represents private sector and pg sxeshgs electrical workers. and iv w local 6 represents public sector including puc line workers and other electrical workers. has there been out reach with local 6 about this contract or this approach to augmenting staffing given the current labor environment. it is different and raising

questions. a baptist discussion. thank you for your comments. there are no more callers in the queue. >> public comment is closed. >> is there clarification? on this item? i thought -- private sector. >> you have a question i will answer you, commissioner. >> this sell a proof sector >> they need to have a different kind of >> we reached out to local 6 and they are supportive of this effort. we want to make sure that folks were in the loop and reached out to local 6 they are aware and they support it.

>> okay. no more questions or comments have a motion and second? so moved. >> second. >> could you take the call yoochl president ajami. >> aye >> maxwell. >> aye >> commissioner paulson. >> aye >> commissioner riverasm >> aye >> commissioner stacy. >> aye. >> item passes. thank you. police read the next item. >> next is public comment on the matters to be discussed during closed session. member who is wish to comment on item 15 in closed session conference with council regarding litigation oaks versus san francisco. san francisco superior court cgc-20-585373. settle am of litigation by

michael oaks against san francisco. with the city to may michael oaks 95 thousand for full and final release. do we have members present to provide comment on this item? do we have callers with hands raised. >> there is one caller in the queue. this is item for closed session. >> have you 2 minutes. >> can you hear me now. >> loud and clear. >> david pillpel. today's item description for this closed session matter does not summarize the nature of the claim or litigation i thought the based on the last closed session of september we were including a line this does indicate that the proposed settlement for 95,000 in

exchange for full and final release but not a line that has complaint or flooding claim or whatever the matter was. i thought we were doing that on agendas going forward if i thinked get like a 1 sentence on what the subject matter is that happened be great and going forward. include that in the agenda item description, that would be great. no issue with the settle am. not my concern. just sum row description of the nature of the claim of litigation. thanks for listeningch more fun next time. appreciate it. >> thank you. there are no more callers. >> public comment on item closed session is closed. >> can i have air motion to

start the attorney client privilege. why move to acert. >> second. >> president ajami. >> aye >> vice president maxwell. >> aye >> commissioner paulson. >> aye >> commissioner stacy >> aye. >> commissioner rivera. >> aye. >> we are okay. um -- colleagues we are back from the closed session and want to announce that commission recommended the board of supervisors approve the settle am under closed session item 15. i would like to have a motion and second on not to disclose to disclose not to disclose.

>> yes. >> second. >> thank you, can we have a roll call yoochl president ajami >> aye >> commissioner paulson. >> aye. >> commissioner rivera. >> aye >> commissioner stacy. >> aye. >> the item passes. could you read the next item. >> that concludes your business for today. meeting is adjourned. thank you. thank you.

>> important inform keep the drains clear it impacts the flooding in the environment and the neighborhoods. >> hopefully, we'll have another rainy season that is important people keeping up tare trains 72 hours one thing to captain about things but take responsibility. >> we will in the best city in the world keep it clean. >> i invest a live-in san francisco for 38 years and proud owner of here. >> if we chip in i'm daniel a small business owner in the tenderloin and named in any drain after any boss. >> wear gloves.

>> i'm diane this is kay we're in the golden gate hewitt's area and deposited 3 >> when i open up the paper every day, i'm just amazed at how many different environmental issues keep popping up. when i think about what planet i want to leave for my children and other generations, i think about what kind of contribution i can make on a personal level to the environment. >> it was really easy to sign up for the program. i just went online to cleanpowersf.org, i signed up and then started getting pieces in the mail letting me know i was going switch over and poof it happened. now when i want to pay my bill,

i go to pg&e and i don't see any difference in paying now. if you're a family on the budget, if you sign up for the regular green program, it's not going to change your bill at all. you can sign up online or call. you'll have the peace of mind knowing you're doing your part in your household to help the environment. >> goovend, everybody. >> how is everyone doing today? >> awe some. great weather we were dreading it would rain today and look at the sky behind me. gorgeous.