you know -- the fleet watch system is installed on every bumps based on driving conditions, generates data data is generated for miles. driven by a bus. which then is multiployed by the tires. so that information is then used to make payments to michelin. we gent rit that data and identify the mileage. and that we mta approved payment based on the mileage used. >> other thing is outside of the fleet system. you know the contract requires road call. if there is a coach or bus out there out of service on the street, and it it is tire

related, they are called michelin is called and in time to respond to that road call. and correct it or request the bus to be towed if it can not be corrected on the street. that information then could be garthed for performance standards. from our central control facility. the bus will community throughout central control office and we have data that we gent rit to use the contractor compliance on the 60 minute window they respond by. as said, we have michelin has tire inventory on our property all bus facilities. any time there is usage deficiency of contractor condoleed any location. and you know. get the buses back on.

>> those other controls that are in place prior contract and in this contract. michelin also additionally produces their own data. which we have access to and if we need to use any of that, we request it. ruche as the wear of the tires. mitch listen measures the wear prior to replacing it. we can ask for that information any time we wish to. in this case, the contract that is irrelevant not a critical thing. only because. it is up to michelin. and theeds to be they would buy additional tires and we don't pay for the tires. we pay for the mileage. that means michelin needs to buy

and should buy high quality tires that will last longer time. those are the systems and control in place now. we had discussions in the past week related to potential low adding additional and willing to do so we could ask whether in a periodic manner records of the experience this identified mechanical defects. or conscience that would reported by michelinful road call arrival time compliance. we can monitor this and document that. total number of tires at each location they have that data we can request that any time. and -- any safety related usage of a tire. moneying will do any time a tire

that -- defects in quality or -- they would have that information. those things and also the last thing being weather their employees are on site in an adequate amount of time as required yoochlt and mta is willing to do those [inaudible]. additional reviews >> great. thank you. and quick low bla independent to this. thank you. >> we had a very productive conversation with oca and mta and healthy exchange of idea and received new data. regarding fleet performance which pokes to the performance of this contract. locked at 2 different metrics. one a sample of road call this

is michelin respondses when there is a tire issue for a bus that is out on a run. under the contract they are supposed to respond in an hour and the sample data from march of 23 it locked like they were meeting that requirement. and the other pos we looked at was the mean distance between tire failure. >> which speaks to the quality of the tires and the also the efforts of mta and michelin to maintain the tires on the bus. mta has a goal of having 12,000 miles on average. between the failure of each tire. it is trackd and did look at that going back to 2017. that 12,000 mile met trick is established by the against and federal transit administration

provides ref mou to agencies cross the kroint approximate per of that revenue provision directs data from them. this metric is a widely used metrics for transit agencies in the united states temperature is reason. that the data showed is that mta actually has been improving their performance of their float. and in other words the mean distance with failure related to tires has been increasing. it was below 10,000 precovid now to the 12,000 figure this is good. it pokes to the performance again of michelin. and providing toires and i was noted they have a business incentive too do that. i think there is in the like for every scope of work we did not look at -- data pertaining to

each scope with the contract but able to assess the float performance. approximate do recommend approval of this resolution based on this. >> thank you, i appreciate having that data point of 60 minute for response time for roll cal and 12 thousand dollars each tire the expectation we have this gives understanding and you know, as these performance evaluation in we understand that is the standardized matrix we had electric at. supervisor safai? >> can you pull up the left slide you had? that one. so -- appreciate the work the extra work. that -- contract administration mta did to work with the bla this is the information we were

looking for up front. another in a parallel example when we were work width mta one thing we discovered was the light rivehicles they bought and instructing there operators instead. oozing the manual break to hit the emergency break. because of that training and request. it was causing the light rail vehicles to get far less mileage than they were designed for. and so for me the total number of tires supplied and inreason tory by location they installd and removed. that would tell us if there is something going wrong with condition of the roads in an area. if a maintenance -- any of the deficiencies instead system it is important to have this information that will then let the system know if it is

operating appropriate low. i like not being by tire but mys they have a business incentive. i appreciate that. is this something in the contract or something they are offer to do or how are we going to memory yellize this will take place. should we see deficiencies from the did thea we work with the uponen vender to improve their performance and again -- to note, there is daily evaluation the buses have to run timely.

and so again there is incentive daily for michelin to perform. >> thank you for the additional work to the bla. something we had multiple conversations b. and of so i appreciate getting us to the right spot and feel comfortable supporting this new. >> thank you all and seeing no questions go to public comment. member who is wish to speak and joining person line up now and for those remote call 415-655-0001. access code: 2484 035 3728 ##.

sir? tires give you a lot of information how things come and go and know when your bus is coming and trin is coming. i like mta is a great department, mazing department. i utilize muni. since day one and still dom great thing and this tire lease and associated service 18 million dollars is a lot of money. i could you could do a lot with 18 million dollars. a bus 860 bus last time.

times 4 tires. i know there is somebody out there told me back way back from the -- childhood. where are you. are you going to let this help this is a great thing. 18 million dollars is great. i can retire on 18 million dollars. you know you tell us. >> so. that's all i gotta say. >> thank you. thanks.

seeing no further speakers here. and we have no one in the queue. public comment is closed. i like to move this with positive recommendation. a roll call, please. >> on that motion to forward this to the full board approximate a has recommendation. >> vice chair machine man. >> aye yoochl member safai. >> aye >> chair chan. >> aye. >> thank you and the motion passes. call item 5 >> a resolution authorizing the office of contract administration to execute a second modification and contract with bay cities produce for the purchase of fresh and frozen foods for hospitals by d. public health increasing it by 6 million dollars.

extending the term tw years for duration of 7 years from october of 19 through december of 26. member hos are joining and baptist to comment call 415-655-0001, access code: 2484 035 3728 ##. thank you. remember with them we are our city purchaser the floor is yours. >> thank you. the subject contract provides public health fresh and frozen produce which allows for healthy meal service to the resident and parents at laguna hospital and zukerberg hospital. the contract was, warded bay cities prowse for a competitive

solicitation. not to exceed value of for you million dollars. covering the 3 year term if october of 19 through september of 22. the initial mte based on the 3 year usage of the time of award. the condition transact has been amended once to extend to sick million dollars and extend by 2 years to september 30 of 24. i would like to note this is a catalog contract the pricing based on supplier cost plus mark up. oca is seek to amend this contract to increase the mte to 11.bob million dollars and the duration additional 2 years through september of 26. note the original resolution submitted indicated know met amount of 12 million but they adjusted it down to correct this value and the bla avenue recommendation. and this mte counts for

estimated usage for the additional requested 44 mont it is this usage is based on the actual average expend sures and 15% to account for fluctuation in pricing. at this time oca asks for your approval authorizing oca to amend the contract to extend the contracted boy 2 years to september 30 of 26 with an increase in the amount bringing the total to 11.1 million dollars. >> thank you. bla? it is approving the second modification to the cityy agreement with bay city produce as mentioned provides appreciate and frozen prowse to laguanine gowna and general hospital. the amendment extends the green

light to september of 26 approximate increases not to exceed of this agreement to 12.1 million dollars we recommend a reduction based on the only to future expend tours not the past. and thisrouses the not to xoed amount to 11.1 million dollars. we did -- get -- evaluate the vend are performance. we got certifications of food quality. we also got i sum row of an audit that the department of public healing has done on the general hospital side. which showed 100% time low deliveries. this is the key purpose of this contract to keep the food flowing. so i do feel comfort recommending approval of this resolution. >> as amended. >> thank you.

i was going to ask. i think the bla report was saying as of the writing at that time the d ph compiling documentation for satisfy produce delivery. now you have received thez information the delivery is 100%. and long with food satisfactory. >> correct. we have the delivery audit for general hospital we are waiting on it for lagunasm general hospital is the bigger portion here and did get their food quality certifications. >> great. and i think this is like you originally have until september of 22 when first cop tract with bicities. and then we are as the board approve today, to 2024, now you are coming back to 2026. my assumption is this owen in

the previous year in 2024 that they met the performance evaluation in 2024 when we approved the first time extend friday 22 to 24? >> i think the first amendment did not require board approval it was under the 10 million dollars threshold. why understood. this time is because you are asking for 12 million dollars and recommended for in the to exceed 11 million instead that you are here. >> any questions? let's go to public comment. >> members who are speaking in person line up you in. those remote call 415-655-0001. access code: 2484 035 3728 ##.

>> may, may i think may, i don't know. this item is very person because it guarantees that you know the hospitals yes or no hospital and laguna hospital patients can eat great food. they can in this vender or this condition tracting individual company is going to take care of that. this is great. wonderful. hospital food. it is something, right. manage. and always the sort of thing around you coming to eat. what will i each the fear. food is just the most essential thing in your life. well is a famine in somalia and africa a draught and hunger

situation. nobody says famine anymore it is crazy. glad to see this is getting moved on and patients enjoy this wonderful country we live in wonderful place we live in and wonderful stele it is so great. so thank you. >> thank you for your comments. >> seeing no in person speakers here. and madam chair no speakers in the queue >> public comment is now closed. would like to move this item to full board with positive recommendation and with that call the roll. >> move amend the item according

to let's amend the item to reduce not to exceed amount of the contract for total not to exceed 11.1 million dollars. with this call the role >> on this motion to amend this resolution to accept the recommendations androus not to exceed amount of 1.1 million >> vice chair machine man. >> aye >> supervisor safai. >> aye >> chair chan. >> aye. >> the motion passes i like to move this to amended item to full board with positive recommendation. on this motion, vice chair machine man. >> aye. >> member safai. >> aye. >> chair chan. >> aye. where we have 3 aye's >> thank you the motion passes

and mr. clerk call item 6, 7 and 8 together. >> items 6, 7 and 8 item 6 resolution authorizing the rec and p to accept and extend cash in kind grants from bay area young survivors up to 500,000 for design and correction of the seating area with events and golden gate park for the term of upon approval of this resolution until notice of substantial completion and authorizees the rescue and p general manager to enters in modifications to the guarantees this don't increase the obligationsor lieblthds in the city and the purposes of the grants or this resolution. items seven and eight authorizing the rec and p department to accept and extend the following guarantees from california department of park and rec in the following amounts and the associated grant

agreement for a term from july 1 of 22 through june 30 of 26 and authorizing the rec and park to enter in amendments or modifications to the agreement that don't increase the obligations or liables to the city and necessary for the purposes of the project are these resolutions. 7 not guilty amount sings million for the portsmouth square and 8 for the sunset club house and play ground renovation. members who wish to comment call 415-655-0001, access code: 2484 035 3728 ##. press star 3 toern the speaker line. when you robbery un muted you can comment. madam chair? >> thank you. for item 6 we have abigale from

deputy director if rec and park and item 7 and 8 we have tony analyst from the rec and park capital and planning division the floors are yours. >> hello madam chair and mandelman and safai i'm abigale here for item 6 resolution authorizing the rec and park department to except and extend cash and grants from bay area young survivors up to 500 thousand dollars for design and construction of seating area with memory yell element in golden gate park. bay area survivors is a support and action group for young people in the san francisco bay area diagnosed with breast karjs at the age of 45 or younger. in 2015, hay volunteered in the park under the guidance of rec

park staff. inkwoired about opportunity to honor women had passed due to breast cancer they discussed the possibility of a landscape improve am project with memorial elements. inspired by civic aids grove in golden gate p as an example of the public, menity and dedicated memory yell space the team settled on a mall seating area located in golden gate park. the rejuvenated seating area will offer the public respite from daily life. an accomplice to sit, lone or with others. add moire nature. connect it community. contemplate lives lost and reflect on survivors. offer to fund the design and construction of the seating area. the initial cost estimate is approximately 330 thousand dollars. if there are initial costs than i offered to donate up to 500

thousand dollars to cover the full cost of the project. per city policy this level requires approval. on december 15th of 22 rec and park recommended the board authorize the department to accept and extend the grant this is concludes my presentation. thank you for your consideration. >> thank you. >> good morning, chair person, and mittee members tony with the to the division of reshg and park i will present the next 2 grants. we are requesting your recommendation to the board of supervisors to retroactively approve a california department of parks and recreation grant in amount of 6 million dollars to portsmouth square and approve

the grant agreement and the authorization of the rescue and p to enter in groement or modifications metropolitans this don't material low increase the obligations or liabilities to the city. the specified guarantee i'm presenting for portsmouth square was advocated by self help for the elder low. a group this provides meals for seniors throughout the city and do work out of 2 of our club houses. it is process portsmouth square currently was is a capitol project. we have done a bit of communities out roach and has result in the a park design that will if silltate residents of all ages improve park safety and scour and improve the p as well as acknowledge the cultural significance located in china town there are elements in the

design that reflect on the culture of our chinese community. the phil ting -- has secured this funding for us through the california state budget fiscal 22/23. as the money will be transferred to us through theed california state d. parks and rescue rigz in the form of a specified grant. the press of the guarantee approval will be upon the board's adoption of the resolution we will submit the contract and then application for the project. that's the process for this grant. i did mention retroactive but in the in a sense that we have noterned in agreement nor spent funds. it is specific low the date of the grant performance period

will be. july first of 2022. the second grant is the specified grnlts for the sunset play ground and club house. this project also was this -- grants advocated by self help for the elderly and providing hot moles and programming for over an upon handled seniors. used to renovate the club house, provide access improve ams and landscaping and beautification. at this time, the project south central project has not went through the commune process. that will occur in the fall of this year. there is 3 million dollars to help with play ground

improvements. similar to the portsmouth square grant. this was allocated to the department through the 22 california state project state budget with the support of phil ting. and am be administered by the park's department in a grant. i would like to be a coporns for 7 and 8 and thank you to phil ting and budget mittee chair who has been allocating for these funds for san francisco and our parks. i want to ask, quickly.

you mentioned and i understand both you have been for portsmouth square is per and south sunset club house and play ground are part of the infrastructure bond of prop b. that we have allocated funding for renovation with the funds and the ports mug squirrel from had i read through the sick million dollars is for the kitchen, which is in need of renovation and the bathroom is in the working. but this was per of the over all capital renovation for the bond project. hudo you reconcile the spending. will that be -- now -- 6 million goingon want to bond renovation in spending or you will spepdz it first it renovate the kitchen and bathroom before the full

renovation. >> tell be part of full reason vision. based on your feedback i want to explain that of those funds 1 million dollars is going to the waler lum roadway for improvements and also 500,000 go to art. these are additions to the scope of work. another 500 thousand for the club house the new club husband we are constructing there and the remaining 4 million to the learning are project. but all constructed as one contract. >> understood. where are we landing with the bridge demolition? the bridge demolition. lamont can speak to that. >> thank you. the city attorney office is in negotiations with stake holders regarding this. >> that none will go toward demolition?

i believe so i will confirm and get become y. great i want to clarify looking at the dollars for reason vision and sick mission from pille ting will not go toward demolition of the bridge for the >> i will clarify and get back. >> i appreciate. i'm in support of this i'm cosponsor of the sick million dollars grant funding would like to have this brought before next tuesday the clarification of it. with that voice chair machine man. thank you i would like to be added 7 and 8. >> sponsor. and same for supervisor safai. thank you, see thanksgiving no more questions go to public comment on the 3 items 6, sxeven 8 >> member when is wish to speak on 6, 7 and 8 joining person line up you in. for those remote call

415-655-0001, access code: 2484 035 3728 ##. when you are unmuted you can begin your comments. sir? thank you portsmouth square am i saying it right. portsmouth square park i have been there once. in the financial district i believe. and a part of the financial district i don't go their often i don't know why. i great park you know hui got there applied for food stamps and general assistance and there was i training workshop at this park where you go and fulfill the requirements and had us line up and orange vests. approximate stuff like that and

get in a straight line xu know sallow the person that works for the funds and stuff. this is my experience with portsmouth now on 6, 78. core pondses and 5 does that's the limits of my the extent i'm allowed to mount approximate be a part of this city. that's all i got i got numbers. okay. this is a big city and i'm one individual and cut off from everybody at all times and i here to sigh i exist and i'm alive and been this way for a long time. i came from -- had a great family.

go luck competence stuff if you have anything you can help me be that will be great. that's a start. i feel better. thank you. >> thank you. can you unmute our callers, please? hi. good morning i'm maggie i'm call manage to support the guarantee from california department of punishes to san francisco rec and park. i think it is important to have this money to improve portsmouth square it is the living room of china town you see residents and

folks from the community who use it as a garthing space and the living room the only places where well is open space that is accessible and free within district 3. so -- improve am project was community lead and designed for residence denial and park users i remember going to the early stages of -- these community workshops and -- i think that throughout over 8 years of commune engagement and need's assessments and design. we want to see portsmouth square an asset to the communal. i'm call nothing for support. thank you. >> thank you. for your comments. mr. lamb.

next speaker. >> hello i'm i'm speaking on behalfing of the bay's memory yell i'm a san francisco resident a short walk from the site in golden gate park. ridge trail is longest trooil trail through the bay area and stretches over 400 miles 14 miles go through san francisco and by the bay site. the memorial project is directly adjacent to the route on conserve tory drive. feels tell provide a resting point for hiker and bikers along the ridge trail stopping for a rest or snk or connect with nature. we know first hundred how heeling nature can be and

crediting this in a beautiful out door space will provide a comforting accomplice for member and families as well as others. beyond recognizing how important it is we know it will agree opportunity for other resident and visitors to celebrate and connect with nature. we see it as a great benefit to our trail use and improve am to the park and asset to the community. bay youth involved us in this project the past year. we then and there than i have a strong and reliable they are strategy and reliable committed to maintaining the space for future member and support project and ask you approve the concept and fund the project and move it forward. thank you. >> thank you.

i'm alley sxent i'm also peeking on complafl of the bay area young survivor area. i'm a bay member and forder bay board member and san francisco residents of over 47 years. bays has been around since 2003 we celebrate our 20 yearn refers row this year we are established within the bay your. we are dedicated to supporting this project. we see this memorial garden as a gift to golden gate p and the folks who go through the park as a place to just relax and i place to celebrate. as a place to mourn loved ones they may have lost to breast cancer or any other answer. base has offer 800 member in

thes bay your and have new joining every week. we than cancer is manage this touched men and will continue to in the future. >> we think that this public pace will be a beautiful location once renovated forfects to reluxury and connect with nature and just celebrate and come together. thank you for listening to us today we are very excite body this project and moving it forward and we ask for your support of approval of this grant. thank you very much. why thank you. mr. lamb? >> good morning, supervisors, madam chair, supervisor mandelman and safai. i'm amy chong from [inaudible]

self help for theelderly i'm speaking for the south sunset and portsmouth square. we are the renter and tenant of the [inaudible] and the west [inaudible] club house to run our senior programs. all of you have in men times. approximate then and there for the past 10 years have been looking pardon to a rebuild of the portsmouth square. support 6 million dollars. who gracious low helped for more funds to extend the kitchen and club house. and for art work and the other general improvement for portsmouth square it is an i conand the heart and soul of china town we hope you will support this. also for south sunset we are

grateful this rec and park included that south sunset house for capital improvement. it was in the enough money. again, phil came to our rescue and gave us another 2 opinion 3 to add to the recreation bond funds so the south sunset get the new make over. we have been there for over 30 years approximate thousands of seniors come for meals, activities and service, ridiculousination you know you anymore it. both club house are error important to the sunset and the chien town area. so thank you very much. police support both resolutions. thank you. why thank you very much. public comment is now close said. i -- vice chair machine man

reminder from mow and i appreciate. mr. clerk add mow and as well as voice chair mandelman as coporns to item 6. and as well as supervisor safai a cosponsor to item 6. sounds like we have a unanimous support for rec p today. i would like to make the megz to move all 3 to full board with positive recommendation with that call the roll. >> on this motion to forward all 3 resolutions to the full board with positive recommendation vice chair machine man. >> aye. >> measure safai. >> aye. >> had i ever chan. >> aye. we have 3 aye's. >> the motion passes for all 3 items. call item 11 and 12 together. >> items 11 and -- 9 and 10.

items 11-15 together so 11, 12, 13, 14, felony for major's office of housing. >> yes. items 11-15. resolutions approving and authorizing the director and or major's office of housing and community development 11 and 47 authorize to execution and delivery of multifamily housing ref now notes for the purpose. providing financing for construction of multifamily rental housing projects approving and executing authorizing the execution. funding with agreements providing terms and conscience of loans from funding lends and the execution and delivery of the notes. approving and authorizing the execution of borrower and loan green lights the term and conscience of the loans from the city to borrower.

authorizing the execution of regular agreement and declaration of restrictive cover nance and collection of fees for purposes of irs code of then 86. issuance and execution and delivery or sale of residential mortgage ref now bonds by the city. approving modifications, changes and,ditions to the documents. are theifiying action here taken in connection with the become to back loans the notes and project granting general authority to official and take actions necessary to implement them defined. the item 11 not to exceed 43 opinion 7 million in a taxable multifamily housing note in principle amount not to exceed 25 million for sunny valley hope sf not to exceed 68.7 million. authorizing the execution of assign am of deed of trust and

loan documents and issuance and execution and delivery of residential mortgages bonds by the city. and principle amount not to xoed 53 million. item 14 not to exceed 76 million for within 18 multifamily rental housing project hunters vow. and authorizing the execution of an amend exclude restated project loan agreement provides the terms and conscience of the loan from the stele to the borrower authorizing the issuance and sale of revenue bonds by the city not to exceed 76 million. items 12 and 15. execute the amendd and restated loan agreements to finance the construction of multifamily units for low income households loan agreements consistent with machine torand reporting program under ceqa. general plan of the policies of planning code of the planning

code. item 12 the sunnydale block 3 ahousing partners for a total loan amount not to exceed 47. 8 unit for rental housing development known sunnydale hope sf. and loan agreement with sunnydale commercial not to exceed approximately 12.4 million to finance the communities serving commercial percentel connect today 100% affordable housing project in the to exceed 27.2 million. item 15, is with h/f e3lp for a total loan amount not to exceed 50.5 million. the construction of 118 unit multifamily rental housing development, hunter's view hope sf vertical fizz 3 and ocd or

his or her designee to enter in any amendments or modifications to the upon loan agreement and any other loan documents or instruments necessary. in connection to the director determines in the interests of the stele that don't increase the obligations or liabilities for the city or diminish the benefits of the city and necessary or affect the purpose and intent of this resolution. and finally item 13. execute the agreements with the california department of husband and community development urn the fordable housing and sustainable communities program a will told award of 21.2 million. 10.8 by hcd i tloenlt sunnydale blockly housing lp as a developer for a hundred % everpercent fordable housing project 10. 3 million to be dispursed a grant to the city for public transportation

improvements near 1545 sunnydale avenue for the bridge on the skougz date of the agreements to november 30. 20 fro. and authorizing the stele to accept and extend i grant 10.3 million for transportation, street scape and pedestrian improvements and other transit programming and improve am as, proved by hcd. member his wish to meant on the 5 items call 415-655-0001, access code: 2484 035 3728 ##. madam chair >> thank you. thank you for calling through all the items and i want to flag that through all the items 12 and 15 have the budget and

legislative analyst report. and with this said today we have over view introduction by jason lou. who is the hope s footwork policy director the presentation is coming from i will let you introduce them. . i'm jason lou. policy director for hope s footwork initiative in the mayor's office i'm here to introduce 2 items 11, 12 and then for the affordable housing developmentment at sunnydale site sunnydale hope sf block 3a and items 47 and 15 for next affordable housing phase 3 located at hunter's view. both of the cites on potrero are the core of the hope sf initiative. the initiative credited by mayor new some in response to funding for san francisco largest and

neglected public how doing sites. hope sf20 year human and real estate capitol commitment n on going trauma. institutional race sxichl deep poverty. hope sf defiance an prop to reconciling and heeling harm experienced by communities historically impacted by racism and oppression. to follow through on the smiment of replacement housing [inaudible] we are excited approve financing for the next phases of affordable housing construction thissier we welcome exciting mile stones construction out of 3 of the 4 sites and hunter's view phase 3 will be the first to see welcome former community members back through the hope sf rit to return preference. current resident vs a priority

know preference in replacement unit fist than i have yet to do so. after them those who left over displaced am have an opportunity to return. addressing the historic harms impacting this community. so i'd like to welcome my colleague ryan [inaudible]. to present on items 11, 12 and 13. thank you. thank you. jason. the purpose of the 3 resolutions before you, prove affordable housing financing for sunnydale 3 a. 11 authorizes deliver of 69 million dollars in tax exempt and taxable boundaries to financials the project. item 12, proved the loan agreement for a loan up to 20 million dollars. and item then an accept and

extend authorize to scout an green light withical cal department of husband and mount development under the fordable housing communities program award of 21.2 million dollars. sunnydale block 3 an a new 80 unit development. the sunnydale hope sf mysterier plan redevelop the 775 unit of public husband to maked income community 1770 units with streets and open space. block 3a the fourth development of the 80 new units 60 for replace am units for existing public housing residents earns 50% area median income. remaining lot row restricting it those earning 60%. residential unist mix is for families and includes 8, 4

bedroom units. 15, 3 bedroom. 28, to brchlt 24 and 4 studios and 20,000 square feet for 5 commercial spaces a wellness center. mercy customer service center and early childhood education center. total costs is expected to be 99.8 million dollars. the loan before you is for 26.2 million dollars. city lone leveraged with the state hcd affordable housing program and housing tax credits were applied for by the experiences and mercy. with the tax credit, ward the sponsor secures a per minute nan loan. thanks to approval of the infrastructure loan last year near twoochl infrastructure work proceedd and vertical construction on block 3a is expect in the may. construction is expected to last

until winter of 2024. i'm joined by representatives nguyen and pilthser and help to answer questions. thank you for your consideration and next is cindy heavens. >> thank you, ryan. i'm here to respondent to hunter vow the vertical phase. file number 23 where are 3 sfan for taxable bobbled not to exceed 76 million. and for a city loan of up to 50 million dollars. this is a request for tax exempt and taxable bond and city loan financing for hope sf and the sponsors and myself this is a celebration. if budget and financing recommends this loan for approval, hunter's view will be the first hope sf development to come least all of the affordable

housing replace am obligations, this has been a 16 year endeavour from the time the board establishes hope sf in 2007 and hunters vow will be first hope sf to have a right to return extended to the public housing residents allowing people to return to the communities. this is i big deal this has not been without challenge and all over come and would not be possible without the support of the board and the stele's continuing investment and not only public housing beaut the entire neighborhoods. assuming your approval today once construction stars the only cites remaining at hunters's view related to hope sf are market rate parcel and like all other cites they have been difficult to begin due to test the market and test the hope sf mixed income municipality.

there is a builder identify said far phase one on blocks 2, 3 and 9 but due to market conscience the project has been on hold. huntery revitalation sponsored boy yawn stewart company. and ridge point north point housing corporation and hope sf vertical 3 they doing business as hv per ins 3 aical cal limited per inship this will own improvements. this fourth and final affordable housing development lect in the underwents vow is fizz 3. a little history since this is may be the left time i come to you for this hope sf hunters rowel is 2013 phase one blocks 4, 5 and 6 were complete exclude contained within where are 7 of affordable housing that included public housing replace am and new affordable and 2017, phase

2a block 7 and 11 were complete exclude later near this year block 10, 2b was completed together blocks 2a and or hunters's view 2a and b together have public housing replacement and new affordable units 179 units. hunter's view phase 3 will condition tain 118 units which on this over head are the yellow orange figures on the slide. well is a publicly open p that is owned privately. the park being completed under the infrastructure loern that the board approve in the assessment of 2021. infrastructure is over 50% come least and the condition this and is a condition to start we needed start needed to complete vertical to start we need to complete infrastructure to start

vertical. this is i good thing you approve exclude we are at this mile stone because of it. however of the park will be complete when phase 3 vertical is completed the park will be used for staging. 118 units cldzs a manager unit. once completed 53 public housing replace am unit this is are pritted with public project based vouchers and affordability will rink from 40% to 70% city median income. skoor for new afford annual u firsts without an operating subsidy rinking from 55 to 70% city median income. it commercial spaces with one pace a learning center and other i cafe pace. financing in addition to the city, 50 opinion 4 million loan citibank providing a loan 24

opinion 7 million. housing trusts siliconville pro vieding apple loans an apple lone, 2.2 million and this is throne the apple corporation granted to the housing trust fund to give the machine tow affordable housing. tax credit in the amount of 62 million and deferred fee, 1.3. and the schedule if the bond special loans are recommended for approval construction begins in miof this year. construction is anticipated to commolest in 2 years in may of 2025. with full occupancy assumed the end of 2027. know that if the loans and bonds are, proved there will be residential construction on on 3 of 4 help s footwork cites another mile stone and i'm here

with the project experiences for hunter's vow than i are here today. category rain and julie we are available for questions. >> thank you. nick from bla. item 12 pertains to the sunnydale block 3 adevelopment the resolution approves tw loans one 14.8 million dollars with sunnydale block there ,'s housing lp to develop 80 fordable units. and 12 opinion 4 mended restated loan with sunnydale llc to develop 20,000 feet of commercial space within this development your. space be dii haved in the 5 parts include 2 retail space. office pace for mercy.

d. public health helling center and -- afternoon early childcare center boy the [inaudible] institute. we showed the budget for the total development on page 40 of our report and note the city costs per unit is 340 thousand dollars we recommend approval item 12. and item 15 is i resolution approving a 50.5 million dollars amended and restated loan agreement. to construct within 18 affordable units. this loan includes within 1.3 to build out of a [inaudible] 2 commercial space cross 2 buildings the 10 notes for retail until this development and sunnydale have in the been identified.

we showed the budget for the total development in on page 49 of our report within 47 million dollars. and the city's funding 428 thousand dollars for housing unit. and hunters vow and recommend approval of 15 as well. thank you. voice chair mandelman. thank you. i'my excited about the projects. i think than i fulfill historic obfwigzs to pers of the tethis we have under invest immediate and to people we under invested in. approximate so i would like to be added as a cosponsor to all of them this is i great model and think this mixed finance and income and housing development is what we should be doing. i have a question for ocd which

is, as a young lawyer i did a baptist w on hope fix projects. and the theory of the hope sick projects was similar to the hope sf projects, gosh, we were doing public housing wrong. we need to have a mix of incomes and sources and we will build and take down the olds stuff and build the now and the new stuff will last longer. there is one development where we are seeing 20 years approximate we are talking about doing another one in and so i'm curious if ocd has thank youos why and how and whether these projects are financed differently or will left long are then and there 20 years?

>> good afternoon i'm lydia deputy for housing ocd the hope 6 projects were redeveloped housing cites. most of them provide a subsidy in the earlier lower public housing amounts the hope sf converse low are all subsidized with section 8 vouchers or higher tax credit rent. so the projects are much more in i better position to succeed operations, repairs and capital improvements supported and the hope sf model in a way they have been unable to do in the hope 6 model. >> that's good to know and hope they left and look good on paper. of the trouble is we need a lot

more of these. thanks for your work. >> thank you. supervisor safai. >> thank you, want it thank the team for tremendous hard work on this. amaze to see manage this in conversation began almost 20 years ago manage to fruition for the developments that were mentes to be temp refer in nature. excited about the please add me as a cosponsor and i really happy to see them being rebuilt. thank you. and seeing no more other questions. mr. clerk go to public comment. >> thank you, members who wish to speak on the 5 items and gin nothing person line up now. for those remote call 415-655-0001, access code: 2484 035 3728 ##. press star 3 to enter the queue.

this is a great i didn't mean want to passport it all the wait a minute as a former homeless person there is nothing a person who lives on the streets want more then and there housing in san francisco is in a dire wagz in terms of getting this to people. especially this community it is being built up and supported and make sure people who lived in san francisco get to stay here and not expensive for them temperature is affordable and get the machining low rent way less then and there 80% of whatever you are talking b. um -- society other thing is you

know what more does a person need than housing, nothing. and you know get this all right. build t build it. okay. thank you. thank you. >> thank you for sharing your comments. >> good evening supervisors. and to considered the team. most of y'all have not met i have been knowing for a number of years, this program star the 20 years ago ace owns the case was there. i was there with the mayor newsome ed lee. i was there. and i participated i was a consultant for the tenants there in hunter's vow. i'm here to say that i said then tenants will be mad at the rad of san francisco helping the

programs the tenants has admit been represent exclude if you would go become to all of the units given in the san francisco hope there are big problems you in. i want to all hands on deck with the developer union stewart. i know him quite limp john stourt is prebl retoired now. i know them all. like i know y'all. butt bottom line is they got to be all hand's on deck with developers the city department and it is teams because reality who is going to live in these houses in 5 or 10 years, it ain'ts us. not anyone had look like me they are getting rid of people now. all hands on deck meeting to find out had is going on in the houses and what we can keep blacks staying in the place. you know the reparation is going

on i'm saying. i'm here watching i'm ace bennett and i'm on the case. i like to meet you all the new team. so thank you very much. >> thank you for sharing your comments. seeing no further speakers here. mr. lamb, can you unmute our caller? >> great. daved pilpel. good afternoon. i can be heard noise to know this aces become on the case. on these issues i have no concern about the develop thes or financing, rangements i wanted to express a concern about pg and e. i hope before, during and after -- excuse me. pg xeshgs are the next 2 items 16 and 17. >> all right i'm i was talking

about the housing? proposals. 11-15. >> go ahead. >> i'm sorry. my concern is about the approximate terrible for pg and e connections to slow the development or if the developments are constructed this at the end pg and e could flult a lengthy delay in electric connection and prevent occupancy of those new housing units. justs we have heard that a number of projects are being heldz held up by pg and e i help we give attention to that issue so that unfortunate outcome is avoided here that was my concern as relates to items 11-15

>> thank you david pilpel for your comments. and that come leasts our queue. >> thank you, public comment is closed. colleagues i would like to send these items 11-15 to full board with positive recommendation. mr. clerk i roll call wrchl on this motion to forward all 5 items to the full board with positive recommendation. vice chair mandelman. >> aye yoochl member safai. >> aye. >> chair chan >> aye. why we have 3 aye's >> i will continue to call the items out of order item 16 and 17 together. >> yes , sir. items 16 and establish resolutions approving and authorizing the skougz of a first amendment it loan agreements related to the multifamily rentsal developments for low income households and thursday the mir and director of mayor's office of housing and

community development. enters in amendments or modifications to the first amendment that do not material low increase the obligations or liabilities to the city and necessary to purpose and green lights of the resolutions. 16, a first amendment to the amend exclude restated longhorn agreement with turk 500lp. increase the loan boy 4.2 million a new amount 23. 8 million and finance construction costs on the loss of per minute 99 financing related to the within 08 unit development at five 55 larkin street in the tenderloin neighborhood. adopting findings the first amendment and loan agreement are consistent with the journey plan and priority policies of planning code. item 70. execute the loan agreement with photography 40 missioning associates lp. to increase the loan amount boy 8.9 million a new will total

lone amount not to exceed then.7 million. finance construction costs related it 137 unit development at 4840 mission and take action and that resolution defined. members who are remote and wish to comment call 415-655-0001. access code: 2484 035 3728 ##. press star 3 to enter the queue. when you have been unmuted you mibegin your comments. in dam chair. thank you we have presentation by li, deputy director of housing from major's office of housing commune development and these 2 items is frustrate to see for loan amendments before us. referencing become to the public

commenter these 2 items are pg and e have i bla report we will have the presentation and the bla report. why thank you. chair chan and members of the mittee again i'm lydia deputy for housing ocd. buffer today the 2 resolutions request be additional funds on 2 projects you proposal approved. next slide. . specific low we are requesting funds it cover additional heard costs for required improvements to the projecty power infrastructure. as a result of status as hole wholesale projects and design approval and per minute 99 power electrification. so, previously, projects like these would be retail customers for pg and e and require on

crews to bring power to the project are site from the closest point and pg and e would come plea off sight improvements necessary to bring the purto the project. now as wholesale projects the costs are carried by a projects that we bruto you today. for these project and many around the stay pg and e is having difficulties meeting design dead liven and delays on electrification of projects cross sectors not just affordable housing. it is i chronic problem mou for many, many stake holders. for the projects the cost implications are severand for our portfolio we are fearful there may be tense of millions of dollars of costs across many

act ever projects. we men in fronts of you again before long for more support. in 2021 this board approved an agreement with the puc and pg and e affecting 100 affordable project and intent of the green light to pave the way and smooth the bumps as we navigated this new wholesale distribution project which is with it. territory. and -- we established through this agreement some prosecute cols for stake temp refer power. but with the agreement did not get at is that the costs that coming to you with today essential low engineer and redesign of projects. next slide. 4840 mission. sorry.

let me switch here. 555 larkin, yes. so this project is completed construction and in lease up. the delays we are facing not with electrification. the delays are related to puc efforts to final per minute 99 power drawings to pg and e in january of 22 a mont after construction was supposed to be completed pg and e did not approve the lay out for several months. will as a result power did in the begin until may of 2022. building was not until september. this is 10 months after the original schedule completion date. so as a result this consist kayeding number of affects, right? because the project was done

later. we were not able to use a permanent reality look it expired. we had to get a new per minute nan loan with higher terms you know. the interest rate environment has been volatile the last year and continues to be. so. we went prosecute a 3 opinion 67 rate to 5.73 and reduced the term of the loan we could support. that per minute 99 loan within dun boy 2.3 million to 8 opinion 6 million of another is that the when a project delay exclude not losed boy a time the tax equity investor implements the tax credit and pull? of their equity from the project.

oui upon not able to convert the construction loan for i per minute nan loan for the reasons the project was not leased up. so next slide this is a beautiful family project. most low 2 and 3 bedrooms for families. we have vouchers from our partners at the housing authority and income rink from 30% to 80%, mi this is a

fantastic project. we are proud of it. with new funds from the city, total development is 83 million. the good now system this the per unit city subsidy is 220 thousand dollars a unit this is right where we want it to be. this does not make it necessarily expensive. more expensive then and there we wanted it to be but not out liar. because the project is done with construction and have no opportunity to secure more funds from the tax credit investor. this is -- five 55 wellin. next 4840 mission another beautiful project. nearing construction come plosion. but in this case we are waiting for pg xeshgs to sign off on the design of infrastructure imimprovements we were ready to lose up in july of this year now am we are looking at a lease up

at the end of the year. you will hear similar costs. losing permanent look and tax credit equity. you are seeing hard costs which you are not on larkin. again lengthy development period. the original application to puc for power was submitted in 2020. y have i healing sxernt community pace and a wide income range so, again we are increased our development costs up to

within 15 million butt ocd subsidy per unit is not beyond our rink. 253 thousand dollars. which is comp republic to the pipeline of current and recent projects. we will finish construction at the end of thissier approximate les up will start immediately and if things move quick lethal be finish taft exhibiting can have the savings come back from ocd. so, we are working with ocd with clothes at the puc and p gashing and e to identify road block and try to make sure our projects are connected engineer exclude designed and connect today power within time lines. preventing delays and costs is

beyond our control. this is we are department on the puc and pg and e collaboration with us and our sponsors. next slide. that's the end. i will close per mir breed's housing for all sdrektive, puc and you will the city diameters are looking at our irrelevants and what we can provide and improve the provision of infrastructure to our projects. so this w is on going. and in conclusion, we ask for your support for the 2 projects. these costs are beyond the developer's control and, cd avenue control and number one goal to get the projects finished, occupied and red to go

in our communities. i'm happy to take questions we have clothes from the puc and representatives from the development team and the ocd project managers had know the details on the projects best. thank you. bla. why thank you. item 16 is i resolution approving a 4.2 million dollars increase for a proposal approved city throne 500 turk associates a tenderloin community development project. this was described by the mayor's office of housing. item 17 approved 8 opinion 9 million dollars imagination to an existing approved city loan for 4840 mission. that bridge house suggest developing. and you know both cases these loan increases are funding

changes in project financing this are related to pg and e approval delays and noted the change in the fret 40 mission includes 5 million dollars budget to pay for unbudgeted infrastructure costs theory being required by pg and e. i think that we it is -- these delays that p -- that pg xeshgs are causing here in the 2 projecteds are systemic cross the service your and on going for years. from our perspective this suggests to some extent this these are planning issues. that the loans are the loan amendments are fact bail outs to the developers who did not

manage the project risk entirely. and i say that because there are 9 other projects in the pipeline that may come for future funding you know to pifor pg and e related delays. and i think that whatever happens will set i president -- going forward. i think it is important to point this out. we think the city could potential low consider cost sharing with the afford annual how doing developers who are gent rit being fees from this project. another source of funding we locked at both of those upon loan amendments are drawing on the housing trust funds on pay for the unbudgeted development costs. you know puc does have a role it play the san francisco puc but those revenues are high low

restricted. they can only be used for shared infrastructure. and it does not appear to be the case that the costs the change in financing costs are an allowable use of ref nows i don't see that as an alternate source of funding. so for those reasons. can you repeat. you don't think the power retch nows could be used based on our conversations with the puc and the city attorney's office. to pifor these especially the change in financing cost of the projects than i can be used for shared infrastructure that benefits all rate payers. i know there was that add back but may be on a case by case basis going forward for other project this is is a potential

use going forward but those other discussions we had with the departments. it is future these reasons we consider approval to be a policy matter for the board. >> supervisor safai. >> thank you. i have a number of questions. i have some problems with the path that is presented with us today. i certainly don't want to do anything this will jeopardize the affordable housing but i want to talk about how some of the cost over runs and delays. i know there was an easement green light that is negotiated with the sponsor and 4840. and pg and e and the puc. but where the transformer would

go. developers have the ability to revisit refinancing policy. we should have a conversation about refinance being policies this are in accomplice. lot of the buildings themselves a lot of the properties have equity. i know there are restrictions on refinancing and so instead of asking the general fund and asking tupps take this pool of money for affordable housing, there should be further conversations with the developers themselves. and i'm not absolutely convinced that this their is in the i way this becomes shared

infrastructure. i understand it is a franz former serving this building but wonder if there is i way to adjust it is serving more than the build and men serving the immediate area or ties in the immediate your. we are looking at this in too restricted way. how much extra money is this costing affordable housing funds for 4840? if you could come. >> the question is 8.98 million and 5 five 5 larkin is 4.26 million. start with where is the update on the negotiations with puc and pg and e. i reached out to pg and e there

is an ease am agreement and design and reviewed this hen going on for a long time. >> sour there is a lot of history there. i can bore you with the details now. >> please. in miof 2020 the project team submitted an application to the puc and pg sxeshgs for permanent power appropriated by their consultant through the puc based on pg and e monopoly and two subsurfist transformers. pg and e asked it have it reschmitzed under the terms of the new agreement that i mentioned early in the presentation. but pg, and e would not accept it until the agreement of finalized the submittal was delayed for a year. pg and e,llows puc to mitt it in

september of 21 and by that point the construction was under way. 3 months in. we are 18 months later still witting for approval the application for permanent power from pg and e. we are thinking we get this approval by may. monett total pg and e review period of 3 years and project schedule drill of upon 7 mont it is. all this is to point out that besides pg and e exclusive (s there lay are of complications we are faced can the coordination with puc. the project sponsor is in the fshgs pg xeshgs cline the puc is -- [inaudible]. so everything has it go through from the developer to the puc to pg and e and back again.

this communication and rep and coordination between the puc and pg and e are difficult enough and adding extra layer. you understand we had to do approximate w with our pol in our district. the free clinic. it is happening all overnight city but we know it is happening. i understands it was submitted i believe bridge housing gone through 3-4 project managers during the time since this conversation stard and enengage exclude have it get back up to ped and mohcd get miss and start over and have a good representative we can work with. this is responding to our questions and not taking months but the whole thing with puc and pg and e plays out over and over

again. approximate what happens is we go to the yes or no funds and say bail it out! and my question is --y don't being i think we are looking at it in i narrow way. on the -- i had 20 plus people on the street public works, puc, pg and e condition tract, everyone trying to solve for where the location of the transformer would g. find out there was an under ground pregnant way the puc -- i'm saying all 3 wrong. public works had not fill informed nil in. find the location. they were talking about adding poleless. it is so many different jurisdictions and i think in this instance, we are saying use this pool of money affordable housing money. your we not asking harder questions on the mu. this is the puc is coming in to

be the operator. pg and e controls some infrastructure. upon that takes away from affordable housing for the city. and then when we come to the next project we say, major's office will say, we don't have the money. we have to wait and not competitive and les out on tax credits. might have next question is sounds like i know there was an attempt by sponsor. trying to get the ball rolling but we are stuck with missing

out on affordable house thanksgiving will be done special tell not be energized. you will have to redo your loan document and cost more money. i know that there is stricter policies on cash out and refinancing. as it regards to receipts. is there -- look at purke the developers and allowing them to take money out? and -- funds this as well. we are giving machine tote projects. taxpayers get, let. we get tax credits. there is other source of funding we can go after to funds in infrastructure upgrade. >> thank you for this question.

i can finish the 4840 story. quick low. so far the solution from pg and e was they signed the project a time and location 1800 linear feet from the site. original low we thought it was 30 feet from the site. you know how much it costs trench 1800 feet in the city. 5 middle in additional hard costs. 1800 versus 30. i wanted to tie this up. this guess that's what we did on site for the free clinic. i stood there and we said not there, not tlshg here. why not here. this is the cheapest and closest route in the saying that was not done but here we are paying 5 million dollars.

and they did it. in the street or has not happened yet. >> we are waiting. >> we on another project in d7 the bell boa park upper yard had challenging issues. >> upper yard. why that's me >> pardon me. we did do creative problem solving i'm sure you are aware of with reducing the amount of trenching we needed do and. i think time lineos that that are literally like today or tomorrow. we are not here asking money for this there was huge amount of collaborative problem solving done and a solution was deratify for this project. and this was all hand's on deck to come to that solution. but we have not been able to get to this solution and like i said we have noted gotten approval

the permanent power application for this project yet. why i know they said, mi. >> right. >> witness this is done then it is another however many months until the prokt will be done. >> right. >> to your question about the cash out policy. just background for folks about this. a policy that says if you refinance ocd a project financed bithem you need share the proceeds. of that transaction. we have waiver press where we allow our owners to take that moncompetence put it in other projects this need rehab or repair. the primary vehicle for recapitalizing project and refinancing projects used to be the tax credit and bond program by up in sacramento.

so. the cash out waiver policy and the cash out waiver policy are underutilized now as a result. so well is in the that much opportunity for owners to cash out as there was before. >> y think bridge done a phenomenonal j.w. i know we are trying to do our best to resolve a frustrating wagz. it is frustrate to me to see millions. dollars of money go that should be spent on affordable housing spent on -- i want to talk to the puc for a mobile home.

good afternoon i'm catherine spaulding department general manager at sfpuc barbara hail apologized she cannot be here in person to talk >> catherine? >> thank you. okay. so -- i want to say this the right way so i'm noted being cristical to the puc i believe we should move toward cleanpowersf. a lot of this has to do with this movement. has to do with pg sxeshgs not having control of the infrastructure and control and shifting over to puc. and i think we believe in that. but the puc saying, we have chapter 26, this is a single

source transformer only serving one belling we can't use our energy money to -- i don't think that puc is being creative enough. can you tell us how can be more creative. to state the obvious it is an extremely frustrating wagz. we wish tht cost this is pg sxeshgs is passing to customers were not so high. the general principle with cost allocation wushg tillity system already discussed. if the infrastructure is serving that project the customer pays. if i shared cost the utility participates in some costs. i assure you our engineers look at the electrical infrastructure and distribution infrastructure and seeing if there is cost sharing opportunity available.

so that we could fairly allocate costs broadly. so well is in the a high burden on one customer. unfortunately this is not the wagz in thiscasion. and i know, supervisors, you are familiar with the on going issue we have the unfair and costly requirements there imposing upon us which is why we are actively litigating at the federal energy commission. and it is the very requirement this is we are trying to get more fair treatment so this we can better provide services her in san francisco. you mentioned not just affordable housing it is more broad. very good news we do have negotiated an agreement guess forward so this future are

affordal housing projects will be connected at secondary. which is a much less complicated, mauler footprint, less expensive connection. this is the very good news for affordable housing going forward. the customer pays for a secondary connection the way the costs are allocated across the utility and customer is the same as if that customer would have been served boy pg and e retail. puc can have thes and the connection process is the same. and than i are lower and easier. so this is the good news going forward for affordable housing now. i'm sorry. i think that is great. i would be great, i understand you have city attorneys that have opined on this. i would like to see what you all

are referencing. that restricts your ability. if you were not in the conversation, pg and e would recoop having the customers there. you are recooping costs and crediting new customers but noted going to invest in this infrastructure has to be the of client or the tenant or the whoever. dp that's an affordable housing entity. low encome -- not only you are not paying for the infrastructure but getting all the customers. >> seems like there should be a way to recoop costs. in an expedited manner. i don't know. sounds like you say there is a chapter of code saying you can't no flexibility. buoy don't think we are being creative enough.

i know there is a charter. section 16. it does specific low restrict the puc for belling infrastructure that developers are responsible for. there is state law on prop 26 limits charging rate payers for costs this don't benefit them and cost allocation how we allocate costs for the utility versus the customer is specified in our rules upon governing electric service. those are the reference we are drawing from, supervisor. i will note that fortunately, our hetch hetchy power rates are lower than pg and e. this is a huge benefit for customers. >> the electricity not the gas. >> yes. >> i can tell you the gas bills

through the officer. >> iel >> no pun intended. i know we need to follow up on this it is extreme low frustrating that because of this transfer of infrastructure from pg and e to puc customers are of affordable housing asked and the city to foot the bill, teches away from the ability of the city to do more of this. when you are an enterprise department of the i met with your team and youure asking for 8% increase the next 3 dwloers is alegality of money. so, i foal like we gotta figure out a way to be creative i don't want to boat a dead horse. we need to come become to that. and i have one more question for the mohcd. sorry.

you will appreciate that question, chair chan. so i notice in exhibit e of the government requirement loan agreement. it requires prevailing wage for all the w on the job site? and i know the previous director had a letter that was sent july 8, 2019, was sent to the sudden front building construction trades. and state in this letter also committed to ensure on site covered work involved in skilled and trained w force section 26 where are 1 of theical cal public condition tract code subject to obligations to meet hiring requirements imposed boy hud with city local lb requirements. that was a letter sent from the previous director. that memorialized that on the

bond funded monies this it would be there would be a commitment to involve skilled and trinned w force it is in the an issue on this project because it is already has been doing skilled and trained. i wanted highlight that i did not see it. wanted put this out to see the response. thank you. you pointed out 4840 mission is 100% unions the others before you earlier today hunter's view and sunnydale are bond fundd and 100% union. in this letter from director hart low from 2019 in 99.25% of

the labor on projects is union we will look on a project by project basis to see what the if any nonunion trades are participating. >> i just asking more it was manage memory yellized and a commitment med from the previous director. i was -- interested to see why it was not reflected in the loan documents. i understand a reference of 99% prior to and going forward these are all the categories of bond funded w and making a commitment to do and this project sponsor, this nonprofit developer is doing this. i think this there are instances where it motive not be going forward. this was i commitment made based

on that bond funding. i was wanting to know why it was not in the loan documents. you are correct it is in the in the documents for this project. i think what i learned >> manslaughter there is skilled and trained is in the the same as union. that's what i have it is public to be nonunion and skilled and trained this is the needle that some of our subs may be threading. but we are looking at it as we move forward. dp continuing to meet the spirit of this letter. >> thank you. thank you for allowing me all the questions appreciate everyone's pregnancy and end with saying i'm happy that this is being done for the referred

there has not been any family affordable housing ever built in district 11 we have the upper yard and 4840 and 2 private for family doing 50 and 25% affordable. we are prosecute happy i think if you go around the city we other only neighborhoods that are cranes in the sky and projects coming to completion the this complefl this number. 600. which is a big dole for district 11. we are help and help the composition to support hope sf and relocated families and manage that always had a strong commitment to. really happy and then now once the let row guess we violate local preferences and a lot of people that ask daily the super help to see and design projects and being bhlt a very, very

strong and consistent american and it is added to the economy of the neighborhoods employmented to end with positive note and want to thank mohcd and the team, bridge housing. >> vice chair mandelman. thank you, chair chan i would like to ask to be added coporns

cosponsor. i share frustrations 13 million dollars is alotted of money to not spends on other projects. that is00ue know -- district 8 small cites but it some dozens of units if put this a project this had other funding source. so it is a major bummer you know we talked about the costs of projects in san francisco. wean this. these are -- sounds like you know not purke the envelope of most expensive units. we ask you to do a lot of things that express our values and many of those are things we'll want to continue on do. i knowledge it is important and folks asked this you think about

it is ways to driveway down the costs. i don't think it is on ocd or developers this we are locked in conflict. given highway costs we are and how much we demand of developers and our own staff and fundsers to try to like figure out to make this work the negotiation we will push these costos the developer, i'm not. it sucks, it does we gotta pay for it and that's a loss but anyway those are reflections on

the items. >> thank you. i therein say amendment for item 17 on page 4 i like someone >> mayor's office to explain that amendment. >> good afternoon, director of housing development. it was our intention to put through an amendment for resolution to include the easement for pg xeshgs this document is in the done at the moment. that would be remove friday this and the sponsor as well as ocd will attend lands use in the future to get what approval. >> i think for me where i stand it is given fact that thinking about so the 2 funding sources you are taking from to be act

the dollar amount is the housing trust and the affordable housing bondful i think this is unimportant it take that monfret 2 pots means ticking, way from other project and of course it is [inaudible] think about this it is in the just these 2 but other its come you will seek additional money and approval for a very similar issues with pg and e. the question i have on the committee. you know, i know this supervisor safai had questions with temperature are we feeling and just note that the budget and legislative analyst says, this is you know, recommendation there is in recommendation in fact this is a policy decision for this body to decide. we approve this money.

to allocate additional monies or not. i think the question sill want to open up is where are we going? are we thinking we will move this forward. proving this or thinking this we need more time to decide because we need to have more information? from sfpuc, give us direction about not just the 2 projects this is irrelevant not just these 2 projects. really about over all how the city you know manage affordable housing project in electrify them or the design and conversation with about trenching and approval and delays. what are our thoughts? >> i would say i mean the one thing that feels in the balance is finding out more information from puc.

i would not want to slow anything down this impacts the projects i don't know if we were allowed a week to get more information from puc would that i gotten don't want to affect loan documents i have to hear from them on that. but if it impacts more costs or delays i would not want to. >> of course it, does. >> may be. >> thank you. lid why. we request approval today if possible because any delay to the closing of loan amendments will result in lower construction interest carry and extended over head piment to the yes or no condition tractor for conditions at the site. and another week of lost income from losing the units 425 thousand dollars a mont for

these costs for a week we are looking at 100 thousand more in costs. time is of essence here. >> thank you >> supervisor safai. i say what we can do is approve this today and what i ask is if there was information that we found gave flexibility to puc to cover some costs you would not have to pend this you have the authorization and the money is there that additional money we approve today if it -- something came out that they could help funds some of it. you could holds on to the money >> sloulg. return them become to ocd for use on other projects. >> thank you. >> and i think this i will like more information. i know that like in your presentation you mentioned sb

question by scott wiener. i think the in this bill requiring that i think the bill is really coming from the place of identifying the problems we are facing. may be not everything gut goal is to how do we either speedup

or -- you know just stop the delays from pg xeshgs. or in the events we have to have a type of drills that pg and e is financial low responsible as well. in the wagzs. you know the bill require electrical corporation to interconnect a development project with the within 8 weeks. sf the conversations my assumption is this perhaps and i know the puc is in support of the bill and so my assumption is this hopeful leave that helped the city conversation we don't know if the bill will go anywhere. but if it does i hope we utilize the bill and try to recuperate the money down the road. i know this will not be retroactive but help the projects that are now in the upon pipeline. i'm fine with voting out today. clear about this body about be it -- may be the bla that has

suggest today is planning with the developer the conversation it is puc has puc has a solution moving forward. for not just with these projects but for all public works project we need to electrify. with this would that be okay with you. voting them out but before we do that i believe we need public comment. >> yes, in dam chair. members who wish to speak are in person line up now. remote call 415-655-0001, access code: 2484 035 3728 ##.

>> good afternoon i'm [inaudible]. i over see northern california development bridge housing. i want to thank the mayor, board of supervisors supervisor safai and staff with the major's office of housing for partner help and support of our project the 4848 mission. if you would bear with me some of what i say is discussed today but want to reiterate after several years of perseverance include being procuring tax credit and exempt bnldzs to a competitive funding cycle in 2020 we would be 35ed break ground in june of 2021. amidst the pandemic to deliver 137 units of affordable housing and neighborhood healing clinic in the excelsior. our project is on schedule and welcome fells to the new homes in july this year. but as we heard we are

[inaudible] without pg and e providing power and have no choice but wait for their approval. we followed the procedures established by the puc and pg xeshgs 10 all actions needed date over several years to cope with the current press in san francisco, doing what it takes to push forward our application. unfortunately despite our efforts we have not got pg sxeshgs to act timely. i would appreciate your support today as you have supported us in the past years to deliver these needed housing units and the health clique clinic who i you work toward improving the process for prosecute curing purfor future developments. thank you.

long discussion and personal one i'm glad to be a part television we all want to help we will want to be understand what is helping. you know what is going on. and i can only acounsel for today i can, count for what happens until i go to sleep at night and wake up the same thing if you have a wrong notion about what things are gog and hopes for tomorrow you are met with different things on the street. violence, attack and strangers getting close to you and it krez. we you will want help. a shame i come and request this for the body figo anywhere else the body i'm asking does not reflect this. i get a different environment which switchos and off

engineered by member. are we i want housing we want housing if i had a house i accomplice to live i have not had a place to live in 20 years. 20 years i have have not had a place to live am okay. a very precarious situation. xu had a chunk of [inaudible] any by. go by. and you you wonder. great to be here i'm feeling great. see what happens. happy san francisco, i guess. thank you. next speaker, please.

>> good afternoon supervisor safai, chan and mandelman. elizabeth practical developer at mission housing. we are appreciative you are hearing the item and providing insight regarding the issues facing five 55 larkin and 4840 mission. we support recommendations provide gap funding to the projects murder to off set the impacts they are facing. today's ideas go beyond the scope and the sxroesz hope the problems will be addressed in a quick manner moving forward. as a developer no stranger to the issues with our [inaudible] development. faced lsdz of 2 million dollars in cost savings due to delays resulting from power issues we understand the gravity of the situation. the real impact this has on residence denial hos are awaiting this housing.

thank you for your time and consideration. good afternoon kevin kitchen on mission hougz. thank you for bring thanksgiving thumb is needed daylight for a language time. i think there are a couple things going on. under funded mandate put on developers i like what the supervisor brought earlier. and explaining this trade off the idea of a revenue share i say i don't want to peek on affordable developers the idea that on the thin majorityince of doles we have local subsidy and he serving low income families. where would the ref now share come from. we like predictability in the market place. real estate development relios this in the market accomplice.

we have it when we had low side metering with pg sxeshgs that disappeared. goal posts are moved. we missed our time lines and put upon us by this relationship. we would not chose this. ourselves. as of risk mitigation. thank you. thank you. no future speakers here can you unmute our caller? >> good afternoon. i'm charlie i want to thank you for your time and consideration of mohcd recommendations for larkin and mission street affordable housing. on behalf of the counsels of commune housing organizations we fully support the recommendation to the committee to provide additional gap funding to the projects to off set the impact

it is of the delays associated with u stillity infrastructure at each assignment as a result nonprofits experience financial empictures caused outside of the developer krell. i gap funder and prosecute voids financial support for situations like this to keep the housing production moving. and helps ensure this experiences deliver the best project and secure the best terms. we support mohcd to the board and urge the finance committee to approve this request to handle the projects. thank you. >> david pilpel. on these to items good discussion. lots of issues. i don't have specific thoughts on mohcd i agree with catherine

if the puc had is irrelevant about the wholesale distribution tariff and facilities. i have in the locked at the state legislation upon the topic. but either of the wiener bill or perhaps something by members ting and hene should require utilities to connect custody commerce independent it engineering requests within a time frame? when you called puc about water they connect you. it is in the like there is a legnhi delay. and pg sxeshgs gets away with delay here and further issue state legislation i think should only require minimal innervenaling fasill uts for grid protection and safety. pg and e using innervenaling approximate sillities as an xous to upgrade their infrastructure at customer costs in the case of

affordable housing at the cost and delay to those using projects. >> hello. i'm calling from san finish housing development. community based [inaudible] bay vow hunter point and western edition we are supporting the [inaudible] recommendation. to increase [inaudible]. we oppose cost sharing with affordable developers there are significant can costs. the [inaudible]. state limited lands. and developers reduced.

what is supporting the fordable housing things get b. so ultimate low the costs are beyond control. we love to see a solution like sb83 but most important others get [inaudible] to [inaudible]. thanks. thank you. and with this in dam chair that conclouteds the queue >> public comment is closed. i think vice chair you were here when i mentioned move it i know this recognized you are coporns to the 2 items let's move this out to the full board without

recommendation and with that mr. clerk call the roll. >> for i point of clarity. there was an amendment offered we are in the taking that. the amendment was offer by mohcd i will move so let's move the amendment. let mow my apologies i need to put actually machine from mayor's office read the actual i know page 4 and striking the line help me out quick. line page 4 line 13-18 striking that paragraph. about easement. iot easement it is in the done yet wrchlt thank you. with this motion to amend mr. clerk? >> on this motion to amend this resolution to strike the language as stated by member safai, vice chair mandelman. >> aye yoochl member safai. >> aye. >> chair chan? >> aye

>> thank you the motion passes and with that move the amended items 16 and 17 to full board without recommendation and with that mr. clerk call the roll. >> on that motion to forward the 2 resolutions as amended to the full board without recommendation vice chair mandelman. >> aye >> member safai. >> aye. >> chair chan. >> aye. thank you, the motion pass and mr. clerk item 9 and 10 together. why item 9 and 10. resolutions, proving the 23, police agreement with the city acting by and through airport commission. conduct flight operations at the san francisco airport for 10 groers july first of 23 through june 30 of 2033 the planning determination and authorize of the director for modifications

to the lease this don't increase the on gigzs or liables to the stele and are necessary. the purposes of the lose or resolutions. item 929 airline and 10 with 11 airlines and identified in the resolutions. members of public joins us and wish to comment call 415-655-0001, coped code. . press star 3 toern the peeshg line a prompt will indicate you have raised your hundred and your significant medical to begin comments. why thank you, mr. clerk i have received i request for san francisco the airport requesting for continuance on the items. with this i will like to condition the 2 items to the call the chair but let's go to public comments for these. >> thank you, in dam chair. member when is wish to spoke on the conditionance of the airport items lineup mou come those

remotely call 415-655-0001, access code: 2484 035 3728 ##. no one instead which i am ber. unmute our caller, please. >> great. david pilpel i poke on this issue 2 weeks ago said there great work by the airport staff on this matter. as i think i saw buried in the item the rate and terms go to 1981 and the lease agreement from this time and so i think it is worth updating it. more then and there 40 years later. these agreements would provide more certainty and stability for

the tenant airlines for the airport and for the city and so i think we will all benefit from now 10 year agreements here. i did note the continuing service payment i understand is unusual and u nobodying providing 5 million or 15% of condition session ref moues to the yes or no fund and the continuance today i say take whatever time you need to get this right. i think it is better it get it right. i continuing is good the 11 agreements caught up with the original 29 so they will w together so as i say take the time get this right x. tell get done. thanks for listening. >> thank you david pilpel. that completes our queue >> public comment is closed. and clothes i like to move the 2 items to continue the 2 items to

the call of the chair and with this mr. clerk call the roll. >> on this motion to continue both the resolutions to the call the chair. vice chair mandelman. >> aye. >> member safai. >> aye. >> chair chan. >> aye. >> thank you the motion passes the 2 items continued to the call of the chair and let's circle become to item 2 where we need to move the amendments. which is the increasing the dollar amounts for all the city departments listed. and also adding rec and p to this list. allocation by a million dollars. would you like to read off dollars for us? before we make the megz to move? >> i don't have the amendments the budget director is on her

way back. no problem you know because we need to get on to the budget and finance budget we need to wrap xup must have to budget and appropriation i believe i have the copy in front of mow if i may give mow a second here. from 63 million to 65 million total. >> thank you. 1040 item 2. from 62 million dollars to 65 million dollars. and adding rec and p department.

with this motion to amend mr. clerk. call the roll. >> on that motion to amend as read boy the chair. royce chair mandelman. >> member safai. >> aye. >> chair chan. >> aye. we have three aye's >> motion pass and now we will continue this item to next week. >> and with that, i move to continue for the next april 26. budget and finance mitto with this mr. clerk call the roll. >> on the motion to continue to the 26 meeting as amended vice chair mandelman. >> aye >> member safai. >> aye. >> chair chan. >> aye. >> we have throw aye's >> the motion passes. and mr. clerk do we have item

before us? >> this completes the business per this committee. i am going to ask you should we come become at 1. . 45 or continue at we have 5 minutes. >> i need a break. >> okay. so we will be -- fine. we will be back for budget and appropriation at 1:50 p.m. thank you the meeting for budget and finance is adjourned.

>> >> (indiscernible) faces transformed san francisco street and sidewalks. local business communities are more resilient and our neighborhood centers on more vibrant ask lively. sidewalks and parking lanes can be used for outdoor seating, dining, merchandising and other community activities. we're

counting on operators of shared spaces to ensure their sites are accessible for all and safe. hello, san francisco. i love it when i can cross the street in our beauty city and not worry whether car can see me and i want me and my grandma to be safe when we do. we all want to be safe. that's why our city is making sure curb areas near street corners are clear of parked cars and any other structures, so that people driving vehicles, people walking, and people biking can all see each other at the intersection. if cars are parked which are too close to the crosswalk, drivers can't see who is about to cross the street. it's a proven way to prevent traffic crashes. which have way too much crashes and fatalities in our city. these updates to the shared spaces program will help to ensure safety and

accessibility for everyone so we can all enjoy these public spaces. more information is available at sf dot gov slash >> it was an outdoor stadium for track and field, motorcycle and auto and rugby and cricket located in golden gate park, home to professional football, lacross and soccer. adjacent to the indoor arena. built in the 1920s. the san francisco park commission accepted a $100,000 gift from the estate to build a memorial in honor of pioneers in the area. the citynd