approved before may of first and were the committee to take action on next wednesday the 26th, it would get to the full board on may second which close to mifirst xu go it administrative code yes, i will for one night. i think that just to preserve this option, i would -- suggest and request you make this amendment today it preserve the 8 to do t. if you decide not to you can tick it out next week but you kennel if you in this would telephone it mithird and in the to the board until may ninth and a week in admin code jill >> do we have the language? i just read it. why i condition only read it sill circumstantial lit it.

please. hold on one second. a few clicks of a button. our clerk would need the language and the city attorney. you will all have it i'm help to reread it. can i ask a question related. i don't feel red to mech this decision yet because i said i think it irrelevant depends whenned with the regional bond and i'm wondering if you could layout whether we approve before us todayer mendz it to switch them. what does in permanent low look us in. no. >> the reality is -- i'm make thanksgiving up but in the month of september this year.

we have to vote to determine when we are putting on the march ballot. no. had there was a ballot a big fight between members of the board and public and organizations the mayor and board about what things will be next and there was no batting order and absolute chaos. the last decade envelope we have done it with intention and science and data and it has been i good thing noise get had right. i'm not will married to the zap i continuing is i conversation worth having knowing that -- i'm

not communicating to the 5 of you butt mayor's office and i said to the major's office when this light bulb went off when we don'tment, which is the hsh affordable housing bond on the same ballot with regional housing bond that does not make sense. is the bonds going to come in november of 24? looks like it but it is too early to say. i ask the administration this is in the seem goed have them at the same time and the answer was -- if this is the case. we'll wap out the hsh bond other delay it and back fill with another bond down the batting order.

there is not a right answer. we're pick amongst our children. sorry. i like why don't we as we review the language by president peskin i agree. go to public comment and see how it go and who i we have time to review the language. so mr. clerk go to public comment. >> members who wish to speak and joining person line up. phone football, access code: 2484 035 3728 ##.

thank you. there are roej nal bond and hsh bonds. can't put it in the board president said i'm asking is do that -- get this passed. 10 year infrastructure plan is great. >> thank you. next speaker, please. good afternoon president peskin and supervisors. i'm joyce.

i was noticed about the climate emergency coalition we need now. i'm coming from a cap background. remember who you are. we are san francisco. we are the city of st. francis. praise be my lord with all your creation. e specially [inaudible]. who is the day through whom you give us let. bears a likeness to you most high. praise to the monand stars in heaven you formed them and precious and beautiful.

approximate brother winds whom you give it creatures. cyst are water who is useful and precious and chased. praise fire you light the night and beautiful and complafl robust and strong. praise to you my lord through sister earth who sustains us so remember who you are. you are san francisco the city st. francis saint of animals sxrierment eccology. thank you.

thank you i'm suzanne green a district 8 resident. you know from the calls and e mails you robbery receiving we have been calling for a climate bond on the ballot in 2024. heard there is no room for it in the bond schedule and addresses mitt gigz in the details. last weekend i read the plan. there are i handful this address our 2 reduction challenges belling and float electrification. solar bat row and energy project. a strategic building electrification project identify need and fund small pilots. and e very close charging

prushth for bus and other city vehicles. they could kick start and positions a leader in vehicle electrification. each one is an unfunded e merging project to indicate awareness of future needs. mixture to nothing that funds cashon e mission reduction in the next 10 years. aware sentence in the enough. and we are increasing our acaptation you have an opportunity to change this given the scale, claimant mitigation is an issue address exclude fund immediate this plan if a bond priors a temp refer increase you

have the opportunity to champion this. don't improust plan. thank you. i a approximately yoiz if you cut you off we are timing each speaker at 2 minutes today. i'm nancy i live in district 7 and i'm here today it add my voice to the ask to you push for a climate mitigation bond on the bell on the in 2024 we need bold and speedy okay on climate mitigation reducing green house gas e missions beyond the adaptation measures we are taking. we must plan and include measures a part of every 63

concern and goal. strong are economy and w force remember out door environment and more. you had this opportunity now as you consider the proposed 10 year plan before you. as proposed does not add quit low fund efforts torous e missions or to support all san francisco resident in our need to transition to a clean, all electric city. i appreciate this the board unanimously approved the report recommendations to fund significant and climate mitigation strategies. and i urge you all now and i

appreciate your comments today to this affect. to push harder for climate mitigation measure this is this plan can vote, no until we have a climate bond that schedule that -- the climb bond that san franciscans can vote on in 2024. thank you. why thank you for sharing your comments. next speaker, please. >> hi i'm e 11a engle with the san francisco climate emergency can aligz and 350 san francisco. i'm a d 9 resident. exit want to thank you, supervisors, for mentioning climate change. the for bidden name. and i'm encouraged by this.

being resistant or resilient does not necessary low reduce emissions. supervisors, you need to take bold action to make sure that the capital plan includes a climate focused bond measure for 2024. waiting for later does not do anything to solve our climate crisis. saying we can't does not stop the damage will continue unless we take positive, pacific actions to stop temperature it doyle imagine the cheer scale of what awaits us if we don't act. water shortages with extreme

floods. those are happening already. crop failures, more healing plans and problems. more pandemics. more damage to property. more damage to our economy and the stability of the city finance. resource warriors can you stop for a moment and instead of thinking we can't. >> thank you. >> good afternoon i'm core competence live in district 11. i want to thank supervisor safai and mandelman and ronen for comments about crimes. i'm here to ask you to push for a climate bond. the proposed bond schedule

contains a bond to adopt manage this traeszs halting chime change. vote, no until a know bond is on the schedule. thank you. thank you for your comments. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon. madam chair and president peskin, supervisors walton and mandelman and ronen i'm charlie i'm here representing community ouzing occasions. the community rooted organizations working hard to build community to plan and house community and partner with the city on now affordable housing. the discussions around the capital plan in the context of multifold increase in affordable

housing mandate special the shortage of dedicated affordable housing funding this is a moment we need an accelerated time prim to achieve the man days. great to see it embed in the the capital plan and bond rotation schedule this . it is a change to consider affordable housing as public infrastructure. building resources and increase our share of stock in the city is investment in prushth how we stabilize neighborhoods and house those that are most vulnerable and experiencing displace examine house our workforce and keep the next generation here in the city. according to the plan the mated need to condition effort on affordable housing is 23.sick

billion. this board passed a resolution unanimous low really -- recognizing the need to do due diligence how to stage a local and affordable housing bond and appreciate this conversation as an opportunity irrelevant to mechanic myself our possibility of success in order to leverage the revenues in order to achieve our mandates. 2031 is not distant future. i'm calling last call for in person speakers. i'm sarah. we need a climate bond in 2024. the plan does in the put climate

action funding on the ballot. there is a certain amount to deal with the damage from not taking climate action but nothing to prevent us from making worse. when the plan talks about climate tell talking about projects it does not cover it defers for 10 years. had is might put in the plan in time. we need a climate bond in 2024. to bring clone power to lift the burden of death and sdoezs e approximately in our most vulnerable communities.

climate bonds is less than failing to start the work. with this last peeshg in the chamber. we have 8 listeners on the phone and 7 in the queue. hello. do we have a caller in we will come back to that one, mr. lamb, thank you. >> [inaudible] i'm not in support c ip as drafted.

the issue is departments throw out of four receive bond fundseen though they are supposed to be self funding the port has a high credibility rating. however, much lower on the scale is the mta. they have used bond funds on the l taraval and other controversial projects. government reform should be impmrementd before mta bonds weer credibility scale and the mta is the puc. the puc used the bond funds to construct new on the west side even though it takes 2 fire engines to use the water and go automatically refill. puc prosecute posing drinking water emergency firefighting system with lake merced as the

primary source. management acknowledge this is lake merced is in the drinking water. that money when we use the city issue a boil water alert and require flushing the pipes after which would take 2 days. if the board endorse the bond funds for the puc could make the board complicit with the noncompliance of prop 218. thank you. thank you. mr. lamb, next speaker. >> david pilpel. so i have made comments on the capitol plan at the planning committee. i think the tality plan is limited partner win and balance the needs and issues. very carefully work through

document. i support the plan as written. i support resolution before you and the concern version of the bond schedule i understand this this is a plan it does not necessary low look the city into this sekwenls of bonds. and clearly lifting the 3.25% cap is a policy matter for the board and got a number of different implications proand con. i did finds a few minor typose in the plan. in the acknowledgment page for some reason. listed the next general agency. for and i will community those minor typos to staff.

for mack flexibility you could duplicate file, sends the plan to the full board with or without recommendation perhaps without, amend and condition the plan with the peskin amendment and see what transpires in the following 7 days. i don't have i strong sense of how best to juggle the afford annual housing climate and public healing transportation and needs. i leave this to combrour wise judgment. those are my thoughts on the capital plan. good work to staff. thanks. thank you. next speaker, please. director strong this is joni resident of d 10 and member of the climate emergency coalition.

i'm glad have you questions before approving the capital plan. i want to thank president safai, mandelman and ronen recognizing and mentioning how dire the need is to address climate change. it is in the obvious woo where in the plan this happens that is why i appreciate supervisor ronen's request for information how exactly each bond would respect to e missions the public can know had they are voting for i look forward to ronen's collaboration with director strong about this issue and city departments sf environment wing together. now it looks like the projects can make an impact androusing planet warming emissions deferred or e merging. with no funding. men pursued later.

what world will be around later thanks to our neglect now it stretches over 10 years and affects of climate change notrousing the frequency of affects. these are 10 years which is t is crucial for state and countries to step up bould boldly and quickly. continue to ask questions about climate action and insist on answers we heard about budget restraintses but future expenses will be weirs if we go on kicking climate down the road. be bold and raise the property tax limit for climate action. voters do care. thank you. thank you for sharing your comments. next speaker, please. good upon afternoon will supervisors i'm paul worm upper another d2 resident. i will simple low reference the comments from other members of

the climate emergency coalition about the need for funding. and i like to pick up on the comment of scyllos made. one of my concerns is having had many discussions with city people both in elected office and departments. i fear we are treating climate action largely this agency to that and this agency this and inspect operations. but when we are talking about climate change we will talk about dealing with the way we get and use energy in the city to do massive number of things. from transportation, to providing food. heating and cooling. and -- actions by one department

or one agency sfpuc or private entities like pg and e, will impact what other entities are doing. for example. building and improving house and upgrade electric system. it is in the clear in the capital planning that people are looking how the system will link issues will be dealt with. and it is not clear to me that anywhere in the plan people have locked at -- the types of issues that sb257, i believe it it is david is introducing about how do we prune gas lines and how do we build energy net works improve energy efficiency. significant cannot for san francisco our costs will be driven by the demand. >> thank you.

next speaker, please. >> supervisors. if y'all don't listen to public comment upon without talk you are insulting the public. on the climate change, the language is very general in nature. so i want to reminds you -- that this land is indigenous land stolen and pollute exclude upon contaminated this is your opportunity to destroyed and pollute exclude contaminated the land to address the issues of

climate change. thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. hello i'm lawrence a d8 resident. in spchlt climate emergency coalition the city efforts are a lotable you heard through the report full transition to sustainable city costs 20 million dollars we need urgency from the proirz and stele a major multibillion dollars measure in 2024. and unfortunately tandem out to climate denial. don't pass a plan without a climate fund, thank you y. thank you for sharing your comments. next speaker, please. confirm if we have anymore

callers. this concludes our queue. seeing no more public comment it is now closed. clothes i think that -- just to keep so this we continue on a kwoer and up finish the meeting we have time to review president peskin's amendment. and let's go for supervisor safai >> thank you i'd like to make a motion to move that amendment so we are switching the order. >> read in referred? madam city attorney? i think >> it is read already. >> good. >> okay. seconded by supervisor ronen. with that, mr. clerk call the

roll on the motion to amend basically switching out the schedule for affordable house and shelter bond to march 2024 and public helling and shelter bond on november 2024. with this motion, made by supervisor safai seconded by supervisor ronen let's have a roll call. on that motion. to amend the resolution as stated just stated. voice chair mandelman. >> absent. >> member safai. >> aye >> member ronen. >> aye >> member walton. >> aye >> chair chan. >> aye. >> we have 4 aye a with vice chair mandelman absent the motion passes with that a motion to move to the full board? >> we have to continue. so i will make the motion to continue for a week.

and yes, second? >> seconded boy supervisor safai and call the roll to continue. on that motion to continue this resolution to the april 26 meeting of this committee. as amended vice chair mandelman. absent. why member safai. why aye >> member ronen. >> aye >> member walton. >> aye >> chair chan. >> aye. we have 4 aye's with vice chair mandelman abdent. thank you the motion passes. do we have other items before us today? >> this concludes your business. thank you. the meeting is adjourned.

>> candlestick park known also as the stick was an outdoor stadium for sports and entertainment. built between 1958 to 1960, it was located in the bayview hunters point where it was home to the san francisco giants and

49ers. the last event held was a concert in late 2014. it was demolished in 2015. mlb team the san francisco giants played at candlestick from 1960-1999. fans came to see players such a willie mays and barry bonds, over 38 seasons in the open ballpark. an upper deck expansion was added in the 1970s. there are two world series played at the stick in 1962 and in 198 9. during the 1989 world series against the oakland as they were shook by an earthquake. candlestick's enclosure had minor damages from the quake but its design saved thousands of lives. nfl team the san francisco 49ers played at candlestick from feign

71-2013. it was home to five-time super bowl champion teams and hall of fame players by joe montana, jerry rice and steve jones. in 1982, the game-winning touchdown pass from joe montana to dwight clark was known as "the catch." leading the niners to their first super bowl. the 49ers hosted eight n.f.c. championship games including the 2001 season that ended with a loss to the new york giants. in 201, the last event held at candlestick park was a concert by paul mccartney who played with the beatles in 1966, the stadium's first concert. demolition of the stick began in late 2014 and it was completed in september 2015. the giants had moved to pacific rail park in 2000 while the 49ers moved to santa clara in 2014. with structural claims and numerous name changes, many have

passed through and will remember candlestick park as home to the legendary athletes and entertainment. these memorable moments will live on in a place called the stick. (♪♪♪)

>> good morning. everyone. welcome to the april 11th meeting of the upon san francisco county transportation authority board i'm rafael mandelman. our vice chair is commissioner melgar and i want to change coppeena from sfgovtv our clerk is elijia saunders i will excuse

vice chair melgar and safai and stefani. will you call the roll. >> commissioner chan. >> aye >> commissioner dorsey. >> present. >> commissioner engardio. >> present. >> chair mandelman. >> present. >> melgar is excused. >> commissioner precinct. >> present. >> commissioner pest pest. >> present. >> commissioner steph no is excused. commissioner walton. >> present. >> we have quorum. >> thank you. i think you have a public comment announcement. >> for members interested in participating we welcome you here in person room 250 in city hall or watch channel 26 or 99 depending on provider or live on sfgov.org. for those wish to comment remote the best way is dialing

415-655-0001, access code: 2590 151 2915 ## and press star 3 to enter the queue. you am listen in real time. when public comment is called press star 3 to be added to speak. do not press it again or you will be remutualed from the queue. when your line is unmuted the operator will say you have 2 minutes to speak when that is up we am move to the next caller. calls taken in the order received. speak slowly, clearly and turn down televisions or radios. public comment will be taken first from the public in attendance from the chamber and after on the phone line, thank you. >> before calling our next item i would like to invoke 3.26 to limit total comment for 30 minutes. my intention to give each speaker 2 minutes to speak

unless i indicate otherwise prior to public comment for that item. mr. clerk, item two approval of the minutes march 22st meeting. we have one comment on the item posted website. open public comment for the minutes. why do we have remote ment on item 2? >> check for example remote public comment. there is no public comment. >> great. public comment on item 2 is closed. is there a motion to approve item 2. moved by peskin? a seconded. >> by preston. mr. clerk call the roll. >> commissioner chan. >> aye. >> commissioner dorsey. >> aye. >> commissioner engardio. >> aye.

why chair mandelman. >> aye. >> commissioner peskin. >> aye. >> commissioner preston. >> aye. >> commissioner ronen. >> aye. >> and commissioner walton. >> aye. >> we have eight aye's the minutes are approved. >> item 3, community advisory community report. we received a public comment posted to the website. >> i think we have kat siegel. >> >> good morning, commissioners. this is cat siegel cac member representing district 5. we had our anticipated first in person meet nothing over 3 years. there was interesting discussion for programming tnc tax funds for the quick build program and the application based traffic calming program. regarding quick boulevard membersmented to know how sfmta

plans to implement safety improvements on the network by 2024 in compliance with the vision zero time line city committed to. membersmented to know whether sfmta prioritize project in communities of concern. >> the chair requested quarter low updates for quick build projects going forward. theme was supportive but wanting to see more and faster. regarding the mrakz based traffic calming program of members ammed to know how mta will handle the wave applications it is expecting to receive. and how projects might be prioritized and whether staffing is a concern. they anticipate applications in the first round in july they expect to advance eligible projects able to do with the old program and reevaluate if this is not the case.

on the trial the travel diary survey item. membersmented to see it included harder to reach folks those in non-english speaking communities and lower income folks the sends round of data collection would take into account for lack of representation of those populations. >> we received the presentation on bay area express lanes that came in march. members were interested in hearing about the benefits of managed lanes and supportive of studies. several expressed concerns about equity implementations with paid compared to hov and priority transit lanes. thank you very much, i'm here for questions. >> thank you. i don't see any comments from colleagues.

is there public comment on item 3? anyone in the chamber? come forward. seeing none do we have remote comment on three. >> checking. there are no public comment. >> all right. public comment on item 3 is closed. >> item 4 ash point 2 members to the community mittee report this is action item and received a public comment which has been posted to our website. why all right. i think we have mike pickford here to make a presentation. we are continuing the d1 we will continue d1 and consider the d three? >> good morning. transportation authority as an 11 member committee with each member serving 2 years the board apointses to fill open seats starch nor the cac make recommendations on appointments.

applicants must be san francisco residents and appear before the board once to describe interests and qualifications there are information on each applicant. there are 2 open seats you may act of but -- chair mandelman provided guidance on that. can i take question and chair mandelman rosa chen who's term expire in the march 23 is here to speak to her interest in reappointment. >> all right. bring up ms. chan. >> good morning i'm here for reappointment for the pack. during my time i contributed to prospect well transportation expenditure plan. beyond this i'm a part of transportation research improve am plan. working on transportation [inaudible] work in china town and the greater san francisco. specific low working a lot on

the one california and central subway. i have experience in transportation work and getting voice heard on transportation issues from my job as a community planning manager and china town community development center and hope that being on the pack again i can work on safety, out reach and make projects more accessible to monolingual folks. thank you. >> all right. >> thank you. >> commissioner peskin. >> thank you, chair mandelman i wanted to thank ms. chen for her service and wellingness to continue to serve the work she has done it has been helpful to this commissioner and i very much appreciate her service. >> commissioner chan. i wanted to note that the another appointee for district one is my mistake that i just mixed update scheduling and

would like to continue this appointment to april 25th and which time our appointee sean king will show up and i can speak to that appointment for your support. >> thank you, commissioner chan and that's what i will do. and we should open up to public ment if there is anybody in the chamber come up. let's see if there is remote comment on item 4. >> checking for remote comment. there is no public comment. public comment on item 4 is closed. i will take commissioner peskin's remarkses. >> that is true. >> is there a second, seconded boy dorsey and i think we is take this same house same call without objection. >> mr. clerk. call item 5.

>> 5, federal legislation update. we received one comment posted to the website. i think we have mark watts remotely? i don't see him. >> hi. apologize there was something i'm ready. >> good ahead. >> thank you very much. golly. so, today the staff is before you to bills to consider. both on the watch list waiting for amendments. that we were anticipating, what happened the amendments did and you in they are recommending a support position for both of these. first measure is ab251. by mr. ward from san diego area. he has interesting proposal.

would require the state transportation commission to do a study to look at or task force and a study to look at the relationship between vehicle wait moving on the roadways, and the severity of injury when is there are incidents on the roadway. the measure the will require a report to be submitted by january of 2026. and staff is recommending this support position because of vehicle weight fee would have a change consumer behavior and generated by a fee could spent on traffic safety improve ams. that's the first item. the second is -- ab645 by the chair of the transportation committee. laura freed man. would establish or 6 cities in

the state including san francisco. taxicab the 80 to conduct a speed safety pilot program. and in san francisco the gold be to look at the safety corridors. on streets with my numbers of speed contests. and school zones. the bill was added to the watch list in march. this more substantive language add as i indicated. and the use of speed safety cam ares are part of san francisco vision zero strategies. we believe that chp will be neutral this year. and as well we will see some of the traditional opponents of take a lighter position since they are limited pilot programs rather then and there state wide series of measures. with that, i would bring the 2

bills to a close. they do require action. would comment on the state budget, it hen a quiet couple of week this is is due to the fact that the department of finance typically issues what they controversy as april finance letters in the first week of april that happened so staff and the budget committee members are busy looking at the minor changes that are recommended in the april finance letters there has not been heavy budget submittee hearings other than informational items. so that's it for now. and amber crab is rib if you have questions. and i would bring my presentation to a close. thank you very much. >> thank you, mr. watts and i don't think amber has any to ad.

i believe former chair peskin pushing on automated enforcement trying to get law enforcement support for that, thank you for your work and -- commissioner dorsey? >> thank you, chair mandelman. i wanted say, thank you to mr. watts and everybody cta and everybody i know working on this over the years. it is gratifying to see ab645 move from watch to recommend upon. left week the board unanimously supported a resolution supporting this. which would create a speed safety pilot program. i know a lot of advocates and many at sfmta are advocating for the passage. this is a measure introduced by laura freedmachine and our members hene and phil ting and scott wiener the co-author in the senate. i will add this i'm working with bill scott to engage with the state wide law enforcement

interests in sacramento hain year's past. have been resistant to this. so. you know as we all know we have seen presentations that san francisco is going in the wrong direction on vision zero this is trough in district 6. i think this bill is important chance for us to get going in the right direction. i want to express my gratitude to everybody for their work on this and hopefully we can get this done this year. >> thank you, commissioner dorsey. >> let's open up to public ment. i don't see anybody. see if there is row mote comment on item 5. checking for remote public comment. >> public ment on item five is closed is there a motion to approve item 5. moved by dorsey.

seconded by engardio. we can take this same house same call without objection. >> and mr. clerk call the next item item 6 adopt a mitigation tax program guideline and freshman 1, 451, 857 in 22, 23 and 23, 24 to the sfmta we received 1 public comment posted to the website. >> welcome. >> sfgovtv i have my slides up. >> great. so i will present on the actions before the board and we will bring on gent wong quick builds program manager and damon curtis

for the vision zero quick build and the structure of the application traffic calming program including review of project deliver and he goals of each program. gi will start with background information the tax was pass in the november of 2019 the measure is i surcharge on trips starting in san francisco for the portion of the trip within the city. tax includes private transit companies and autonomous vehicle. tax are 3.25 for single occupant. discount for ev and 1.5% for shared trips. >> back in 2019, revenue projections at 30 million per year had we collect friday january of 2020 to december of 22 is 40% of that. the revenues collected is 33 million. and the first guide lines were

approve immediate october of upon 2020 and due to revenue levels uncertainty programmed to the vision zero quick build program and the board allocated these funds. everwe are keeping consistent with the prior guidelines and taking prop to programming and allocations. we recommend programming funds anticipated to be collected through the dis fiscal 23-24 and allocate after collected. >> this graph provides how revenue is performing. this bar graph includes the total revenue and the pandemic and remote trends reduced traveling. the travel reduction impact revenues collected the past 3 years. fiscal 22/23 and the prosecute jerked revenue based on

controller report. fiscal 23-24 estimate is based on controller reports. we use 3% of ref nows for program administration and data analysis. >> and total the ta share of revenues collected overnight past year since 2020 and projected to be collected the remainder of 23 and all of fiscal 24 totals 20.7 million allocated 7.million with the first update to the guide lines recommend programming 21.2 million in additional revenues we expect dye by june of 24. of the total available for programming the ta received 8.1 million as of december 22. and after consulted with mta about needs to meet goals proposed program ref nows to the vision zero quick build and application traffic calming program. current program and the new roll

in program and in the presentation for quick builds address that program. il not go in detail here. >> this is our proposed program. the first project fully funds the quick build the board approve in the february 23. and the second would provide double amount of fund to the quick build in 23-24. the next project would fund the construction phase for the application traffic calming program for the applications received between july of 20 and june of 21. record number. the last project be funded the new application base the program we are excited see off the ground. >> and chair mandelman du want me to pause for questions or want mta to present their program? >> let's go to mta. nope hear from commissioner peskin. >> thank you, chair mandelman

i wanted to determine or better understand whether or not the monies realized and projected include money from autonomous vehicle trips? >> commissioner, we request that information from the treasure office combu they are not allowed to disclose. they did confirm autonomous vehicle company and roadway hail companies are subject to this tax but could not confirm whether or not the av companies are paying the tax. >> okay. so just by wave reminding you, colleagues, when we had to seek permission from the state to seek permission from the voters; where in, thankful lee assembly

member ting ushered through a bill haallowed san francisco to put a tax on the ballot extraordinary that we could not actually put a tax on the ballot without the permission of the state. we did and the people of san francisco voted by over 2 thirds to allow that tax. you may recall, that general motors which owns cruise opposed that bill we got out of assembly with one vote to spare. i want to finds out whether or not cruise is paying their fair share or not. and would like to determine with staff whether or not we can by law, wave the confidentiality as to this group of taxpayers as we vadone in other arenas including but not limited to the commercial vacancy tax where

next among we'll all see who is. why don't we take that off line. i want to than cruise is paying. >> thank you. commissioner peskin. now mta. >> great. i will present general and quick build program manager to you. >> good morning. i'm jennifer wong a transportation planner at san francisco mta. and also the vision zero quick build program manager. i'm here to present a bit more information about our vision zero quick build program to implement street changes using a stream line delivery method and support of the city's vision zero commitments. the scope of the program is to make physical traffic safety improvements that are

adjustable, lower cost approximate implemented useings city staff. and those improvements fall in the 4 categories we have signal timing changes and minor hardware upgrades. parking and loading changes, transit stop changes. and anything accomplished using paint, signs and posts. to date we completed 30 corridor projects. and any begin moment we have more projects in the construction and planning and design phases. in our most recent fund request, we are planning add more quarter style locations to that queue along side that, we also plan to install core improvements daylighting or slow are pedestrian walk signals throughout the high injury network.

all of this work is in religion to our 2021 vision zero strategy in which the sfmta committed quick build treatment throughout all of the high injury met work where work still remains. >> we mate this to be roughly 50 miles remaining as shown by blue lines here. we have a consultant study to determine had scope can be done at the remaining locations and we remain confident in fulling this commitment. we seen positive out come that includes the ability to place emphasis on our designity rigz and violation project phases. the ability to responded a bit more quicker with community identified requests and

construction coordination opportunity and stretch our local funding. >> we have seen a lot of positive out come from the individual project level as well. and all of our project evidences can be found on our safe streets evaluation program website. when we aggregate results across all the different projects we see in challengerer trendses as well. and that was the main focuses of our latest vision zero safe streets evaluation practical report. and it found that -- capitol projects are performing with strong intended results but quick builds are performing as intended, too. with this we find that quick builds to be an effective way of

bring street changes ahead of larger capital improvements and fifth street ask an example. it achieved similar scope at a fraction of the time and cost. and it is irrelevant a way for us to test ideas outer prior to committing them in literal concrete. this program spends 250 thousand dollars per mont the past 3 years to support planning, out roach, design, construction and evaluation phases of 30 plus quarter sale projects and numerous spot improvements. so in closing. i want to emphasize that we believe quick builds to be an effective way of advancing traffic safety. and we can stall them through various means through the

corridor style projects i mentioned. through spot improvements. but also through other efforts as well such as our bicycle program. muni forward and transit forward quick build and answering 311's from residents. it has been helpful for mack myselfing resource. i will note this it is in the a solo effort. it is one of the many tools we use to improve our street and we intends to continue this work with the knowledge this it fit in a larger strategy in of on pursuit of vision zero. next i will turn it over to my colleague damon curtis who will talk about our traffic calming program. >> good morning, chair approximate commissioners. damon kurt i guess traffic

calming mc manager at mta. i appreciate the opportunity to tell you about the traffic calming program. il start with a brooefr history of the program and go in reasons why mou is a good time to implement the changes and the changes themselves and the improvements we expect we will enjoy from those changes. first program history in 2000 the traffic calming guidelines were developed and the program was established. first decade of the program was focussed on area projects. that involved a multiier planning effort that locked at an entire neighborhood to identify traffic calming needs. the end result was a formal report with mir and improvements this took years to implement. in 2013 the program was restructured to focus on

projects the intents was to address the shortcomings focusing on evaluateses applications on a block by block base i. goal was to speedup delivery. this has not happened to the degree we would like due to process constraintsil explain in a bit. >> that brings us to 2023, today. the intent of the changes now is to use the lessons learned from the last 20 plus years of the program to credit a project delivery focus program witness and for all. who thes driving the change in why you in? first, received increased significant low in the last few years begin nothing fiscal year 21. this cycle includes applications received between july of 19 and june of 2020.

of the 221 applications received this cycle, over half submitted during the last 3 months of application period coincides with the on set of the pandemic related shelter at home orders. and those pandemic related increases continued the following year. so during the application period july 2021, july 20 through june of 2021 received 341 applications. and we did see that number return to prepandemic levels. the following year but this was a one time drop due to number. different factors. not least which being so many applied the 2 previous years and we were e merging the latter half from some other restrictions from covid-19.

that folks were getting back to living their lives opposed to focusing on traffic calming at this point. >> we anticipate receiving between 100 and 150 applications every year going forward this graph shows we have been installing more device each year. trendses continue to go up and this year 2023, we are projecting to install 300 devices which is double when we thought 3 to 4 years ago. there has been an increase in proactive traffic calming projects the last few years including direct requests by elected officials. emergency responses to

incidents. requests associated with separate projects or programs such as quick build. slow streets program, vision zero ask schools engineering. traffic calming, counts for 25-40% of all traffic calming devices installed each year. all traffic calming projects regard manslaughter of the source compete for the same resources with plan, design and implement them. it is proactive the proactive traffic calming shows no signs of slowing down. makes it person we make the application base program stream lined and efficient as possible. what are the changes? first, important to note the criticism we hear is traffic calming takes too long. we agree. and the primary contributors to that long time line aror own

processes. first of all we have a 12 mont long application period. and secondly, extra time required to manage separate fund requests for each phase. existings program shown here assuming the cycle begins july first a 12 mont application period followed by 12 mont planning phase. 12 mont design phase and 18 mont construction phase. total is 3-4 and a half years. >> comper se that to the time line under the new program structure we are proposing where a separate be application period removed. funding is consolidated and evaluations for on a rolling basis. the cycle begins july one the first quarter is planning. applications come in they will be evaluated to which mote or

not meet criteria for acceptance and notifications will be cent. 2, design and approved and quarters 3 and 4 those approved will be installed. total time for applications impmrementation of the new structure reduces to 9-12 months. this slide i include today to show the program structure. did not include it to get in details but really to show we do have a plan to manage the over limited partner and recuring phases of the now program and the plan to integrate cowing phases from previous cycles and deliver them with the roll out of the new program. quick low the graphic shows planning phase in orange. design phase in graenful construction phase in blue. with the previous program phases the bottom in pink.

we realize the changes are ambitious. but we believe they are necessary and confident than i can be achieved. with that, i will open up to questions. thank you, mr. curtis. commissioner engardio. >> i have some questions and comments about the quick build program. like i understand why it is necessary you know. it is quick. better then and there nothing. it is a way to test things observe you commit so it makes sense. except we are seeing a lot of men millions spent on many new quick build programs and i wonder when are we going to use the data from quick builds to build the permanent corrected structures. cyclists are beg for protection. they north can thing it.

place like for years protective bollards on laguna honda. many years that should be a concrete bear in i'm concern body a quick build plan by the zoo. i'm hearing that you know it is not connecting to sky line because people don't want to deal with cal tran and people will have to navigate the intersection. so my question is, when we do the quick builds how much are we thinking ahead to making permanent and -- are we trying to do too many. with the quick builted concept

sounds good cyclists don't like it and motorists are frustrated. does anybody like the quick build. we had do them to get data what point do we build the barriers? >> thank you for your comments i'm happy to discuss more about when we heard in response to our work. has a range in some people like it and don't and all various reasons. i will say that with the quick build program we are trying to establish intentional feedback lop in terms of having implementation. evaluation and adjustment and implementation and crediting that feedback through the projects. we have already been coming become to the street. to implement the tweaks and improving them. one example is007th and eighth

street we have already taken 2 or 3 or 4 different iterations of it in terms of upgrading. the intersection with bike signal and further upgrading with transit only lanes to compliment the boarding islands. of course, i know more about our quick build projects but i know this there is a connection to our street scape projects upcoming. i'm going become to the fifth street example, there is currently detailed design phase for upgrading that quick build to the final form. it does take time. to supplement efforts we have other projects with that come

additional regulations we should follow and -- in terms of conduct for our environment will reviews those are additional steps this make it is capitol projects apore to have a long are time line. not appear, have a long are time line. >> are there streets or yours where we than the quick build wed and put up a real protective concrow barrier for cyclists. if you can identify this it would be noise to build this right, way pick this a per minute nan quickly build something per minute innocent if we know it will w and cyclists are. yea that is a great idea.

again i think through quick builds we are trying to mechanic myself when we can do using city staff. a balance and -- yea. we can look at that there are additional consideration when is we do start to dot more capital improvements for example in order it install anything using concrete we would have to check for utilities. trickers investigations about cond wit and kitchen basins and curb r. and accessibility. we want to do all that but again as that starts to kinds of when

the, surface that's what adds time. >> last question. thank you. you mentioned the concrete you look at utilities and all this stuff is it possible to put concrete up put update barriers that you see on highways or you know like plopped down not imbedded that would make a cyclist happy. >> yea. i would love to see that, too. and i think there could be opportunities for that and i think -- you when we compare our program with other quick build programs throughout the u.s., we are very proud of being able to deliver concrete elements through quick boulevard for example. transit boarding items we deliver that through our colleagues at public works we have in house capacity in san francisco. as well as some of the concrete

element catharsis between the bicycle way and moving traffic. we are prud we do have that ability and we have done it in certain place. compared to, jurisdictions. that you know rely on rubber elements. commissioner ronen. is there anything this body can do either in our capacity as stshgs a commissioners or on the board to hasten the process. it is just so many of our constituents want and need traffic calming in the neighborhoods and as you explained that it takes long and i want to be helpful in trying to stream line the press or make it easier in any way we can.

>> i appreciate that, commissioner. and i think the changes we are proposing now will go a language way to getting us there. i think just shrinking the time line from 3 to 3 years to 4 and a half down to a year. will aleaveiate the concerns and the questions we get from the public regular low. all right. i don't think that beyond, proving this, this application there is much more i would ask from the supervisors at this moment but i'm sure i can think of manage and get back to you. a year is still too long. look. we are in this proisz for so

many different aspects of our city. we are trying to trim bureaucracy and make things faster and cheaper where we can. right. without losing you know our ability to meet other really important goals. i just of course i'm looking forward to supporting this item today but i don't want us to stop there i want to keep purke ourselves to shortening this time line. i just when you -- talk to i'm sure all supervisors feel this way. when i talk to contwit went in district 9 how long it take and how burdensome the press is to get traffic calming. keep think burglar it. and feel fro to come to me if you figure out ways to --

shorten the process. we gain so much good well for doing a good job and push ourselves to make a strong and better program. why thank you. thank you. i want to say i want to make sure i manage expectations properly. i think the 9-12 mont time period is about as compressed as i can imagine us getting it. without creating a new sort of special branch that you know has its own asphalt crew to build

the things. um beyond this i think we are already really pushing the envelope a quarter low evaluation and sick mont construction period that is in the to say we will not continue to tweak and improve. it is a can iing cant change. i appreciate that. i'm very excitid don't want to damper on it. i -- also to, yes. i also think that it is still a long time and i'm wondering so. mta does dot work or dpw? >> right now mta does all the planning work. data collection and evaluation, mta does the design work and construction is or it is done 2

ways. upon one is the bureau of street and sewer and asphalt shop that public works builds a number of our device and in the last couple of years taking advantage of as needed contracting press through mta and public works to upon veterans for devices to is up element the w they don't have the capacity. may be you can get a traffic calming crew. and i will crank them out faster then and there you can imagine mag. i like it. >> thank you. why commissioner walton. >> thank you. chair mandelman. was that a suggestion this mta set up asphalt crew to handle quick build projects y. obviously i don't want to speak for my colleagues at public

works. than i welcome the work we give them but we have more w then and there they can handle now. i think this it would should begin or have a discussion with managers at public works to see if it can be done. i can seep a full crew busy. thanks to riand wong and mr. curtis and -- and commissioner preston? >> thank you, chair mandelman i wanted to add is great to seat slide reducing the 3-4 years to one year we all feel the urgency and he i appreciate commissioner ronen's comments. i department to add that there

is a part of this this rare low discuss and i had think is a big impedament to executing this is cordination between departments. this is a reason that our we did a resolution at the board of supervisors eli having the urgency tow recommit around vision verzero. and one thing we had got the funds to design the dot quick build bike lane on oak street. look at the time line and great under a quick build program it can be done over the course of i year. low and behold, the puc was take up oak street the following year. the department's mta and puc don't coordinate about this. in fact when we were set to move

forward and do turns to a project they are lining up to different department in the same space. i do think it is essential that we increased the communication between departments so this we can execute on the time line you just laid out, thank you. thank you. let's take public comment on this item. if there is anybody here that would like to speak on item 6 come forward. seeing none. do we have remote comment on item 6? checking for remote comment on item 6. and there is no public comment. >> public comment on item 6 is

closed. >> is there a motion to approve item 6? peskin this is your money. >> moved by preston and seconded by dorsey. i think we can take this same house same call without objection. allocate 2, 4 one, 887 to the stay stay for you the fiscal year quick build program part 2. we received one 2 public comments posted to the website. >> welcome back. >> hello. all right. this next presentation on the tax allocation. sfgovtv i'm sharing slides to fund the construction phase of the program.

and in february of 23 the board allocated to million in tax fund and 245,000 in prospect k for design phase and portion of the construction. approval of this request is upon the guide lines which recommend programming the funds to this project. with this i'm able to answer questions. >> thank you. i don't see comments or questions from colleagues. so we will open this to public ment. do we have remote comment. >> checking for remote comment on item 7... and there is no public comment. >> okay. public comment on item 7 is closed. a motion to approve item 7. moved by preston a second by

peskin. same house same call without objection. item 8. >> authorize the executive director a funning agreement with the mta for an amount not to succeed 270 thousand dollars by travel diary data collection this is know action item and have a public comment posted the website. we have drew cooper. >> good morning. i'm sharing my screen. the bay area survey is lead by the metro transportation commission. they have a 10 year contract with the vender to do data collection every 2 years. this would be the first year. in the first year mtc is contributing 500 thousand dollars to do data collection.

sfcta contributing would allow them to contribute additional 270 thousand dollars to recruit people to participate in the data collection halive in san francisco. the data is a week long record of daily travel by people who participate in the survey. it is is begin through a smart upon phone app that people download on the phone. >> identify trips and prompt them to answer questions about the trips including why they made the trip and things like that. in addition to the mart phone there is a web based -- prefer not to it use the phone and the survey given in chinese. >> this data would support men of the ta efforts, and updating

and calibration and validation of travel demand model. a molthsdz we maintain part of responsibilities as a conjestion management agency. use project evaluation to develop forecasts in projects like the san francisco trapgdz plan. jot dataald help support the development of condition jestion management prk program we release every 2 years. the travel demand market management travel market analysis study correcting within 30 thousand dollars and this money is to ensure we get adequate participation from people in all parts of the city and help the study to identify markets this are well suited for travel demand management investments. and final low the transportation

sustainability program evaluation tool would contribute 40 thousand dollars targeted evaluating the affect of parking that is built in new developments on the amount of driving that the residence of the buildings to. and this supports the city's travel demand management ordinance requires new buildings to have tdm plans. one of the tools within the tdm kit is torous parking supply. than i would contribute 270 thounz. 1600 survey in san francisco and above what we get from mtc parts. there is pilot and the spring in

a few weeks -- and the fall in september and future round of data collection -- with that i will take questions. thank you, mr. cooper i don't see questions we will open to opinion ment if there is anyone when wants to speak on item 8. come forward. see if there is remote comment on item 8 >> looking for remote comment on item 8. and there is no public comment. >> public comment on item 8 is closed. is there a notion to approve item 8. moved by peskin and seconded by dorsey. and i think we can tick that same house same call without objection. mr. clerk, call item 9. >> item 9 amend the adopted

fiscal 22-23 budget to increase revenues therein, 243, 544. decrease expend tours 19, 121, 435 and increase sources 5 million dollars decrease of 8 pick, 528. this is an action item and have one comment added the website. [speaking fast]. first of 2 items we will have our deputy direct for finance presenting. >> good morning. commissioners cynthia fong i have fiscal 2/23 mid year budget amendment. this is a point in time we steak stock how much revenues earnd

and what has been spent there are reasons why we change the mateos the next slide you see this revenues have proposed to increased 31.2 million dollars. a blue chart represents the fiscal 23 adopted budget and a gray chart the proposed changes to the fiscal 23 mates. we have change in mates for sales tax ref now. hold steady the vehicle registration fee. we have a slight decrease to our traffic congested mitigation tax. and we are alining our mates to the city controller's estimates. we have a large increase to our interest income. we have revolving credit agreement up to 125 million to serve a lone and line of credit. we estimated that we draw down

up to 75 billion dollars this fiscal year. proposing to draw down up to 20 million. since we are drawing down less we will had more cash in the city treasure pol earning an interest rate the past month. we have program revenues we are changing the estimates as well. >> on the next slide these other major changes this can be identify in the 2 different areas increasing our sales tax revenues 9 politic 5 million to 111.2. we have a conservative mate. we were in the pandemic. and we are now out of that pandemic we are confident we will increase the sales tax revenue this . it is a one time adjustment don't get excited you will see modest increases going forward. now in terms of program revenue

this is is another unusual increase. this is related minly to the yerba buena project. we near construction phase with entering in the west side construction phase. over the during the pandemic we have been incurring 20 mission of expend tours through construction. that time our grantor had limited to 20 million dollars of reimburse ams nought end of south gate alignment project they say it is okay or given us the green light to in from for reimbursements increasing program ref nows by 21.3 million. in addition, we do have in decreases. to our projects. you see here this we have either paused efforts or are deferring costs to future fiscal years for

the be month management program and hill crest road -- widening project in addition to our i280 ocean avenue off r. realinement project. >> have new funding. and there are 3 different projects for again the west yerba buena bridges retrofit and broorth headway transportation corridor and decarbonizing delivery studies. >> in terms of ecpend tours recommending a decrease of 9.1 million. interest increased on the flip side for the same reason we are decreasing our debt service cost since we are not pulling down as much from line of credit loan we will not ing kershaws much interest as anticipateded.

we are increasing administrative operating costs. back in december i brought the request to migrit current, counselling system it a new cloud base system. i am proposing we are purchasing needed equip like serve and computers as we paused them during the pandemic. at that point in time sales tax revenue were not as high as now. in capital project costs the largest expenditure. our sponsors they have points of time may request reimbursement from other funding sources their dead lines are less flexible. in addition there may be projects this are delayed such as light rail vehicle prosecute curement and l tear very well transit enhancement. we have a few increase efforts.

again for our yerba buena project we are incurring more cost and progressing on the project faster then and there anticipated. >> we have new prop circumstance appropriations that were approved by this course eversource the largest the market upon analysis and mission bay access plan this item was heard before the cac at the march 29 meeting and there was a motion of support. with this i'm happy to conclude my presentation and take questions. >> thank you. why thank you deputy director fong for your report and for your keeping our finances in good shape. and -- i don't see comments. take public comment on this item and if there anyone in the chamber come forward.

and if in the see if we have remote public comment on item 9. checking for remote comment on item 9. hi, caller your 2 minutes begins now. >> francisco decosta. i have been listening to this meeting intently. i see that we are now going to have some [inaudible] type of computers. and i cloud so this we can have better transparency. during the pandemic won't spent with mta over a billion dollars.

i think we need to have a meeting or a hearing for that we analyze need's assessment. how you have done things in the last 2 years. y'all don't see, i think -- don't [inaudible] public comment. there is no public comment. this means something is not happening that should happen. you know. so public comment is very important. and we see no public comment every time y'all are ask for public comment. you need to have focus on public comment. and a hearing on how we have been spending our monet last 2

years. thank you very much. >> thank you, caller. there is no more public comment. >> public ment on item 9 is closed. is there a motion to approve item 9? moved boy peskin and secondeded boy walton. i think we can take this same house same call without objection. mr. clerk call item 10. >> item 10 approved the code and debt equal benefits investment rules of order and sunshine policy this is is an action item we received a public comment come has been posted to the website. >> hello deputy director if any. why this is a routine administrative item before you. we are proposing updates to 6 various ta governing policies. furthermore of good management practices. had our legal council and financial advise ors assist us and prosecute posing updates to

the policies. we have our administrative code. duties of board and executive director are prescribed. debt policies construct and prefers to issue dent. equal benefit policy enforces nondiscrim nigz in contracts. investment policy procedures to handle investments. our rules of order guides how meeting conducts and sunshine policy the procedures that comply and relate it brown and public record's act. they are brought for update due to the following reasons. to conform with applicable law. provide clarity come flexibility and reflect administrative and organizational, since we have been in the pandemic the past 3 years. in addition to many of our minor recommended changes we are that are related clarity. grammar and typos and readable and consistency, current and current circumstances, we are

recommending 5 changes. since the november ballot measure for prospect k to l we are making those reference changes throughout all documents. recommending an increase to the executive director contract authority if 75,000 to 100,000 and will, line with other transportation authorities. we recommending compensations going forward in fiscal year 23-24 to prosecute mote diversity in cac groups. we are updating meeting protocols with state of emergency guidance and lastly conforming with admin code on nondiscrimiation policies inner contracts. there are no fiscal impact to the item. and march 29 meeting, which at the time included our policy for prosecute curement and travel. but the request of chair

mandelman we recommend bring them later as the board of supervisors may be hearing more information on chapter 12. with this, i'm help it take questions on the policy updates. thank you. >> thank you, deputy director fong. i don't see comments. thank you for your work on this. if let's open equip item 10 to public comment. first if anyone here. i don't think there is. see if there is remote comment on item 10. >> checking for remote public comment on item 10. there is no public comment. >> public comment on item time is closed is there a motion. moved by ronen seconded by chan. take this same house same call without objection. mr. clerk, item 11. why item 11 introduction of new

item this is is know information will item j. i dent see now items. mr. clerk item 12. >> public comment we have received 1 public comment posted to the website. if there is anyone in the chamber withhold like to address us under item 12, come forward. let's see if there is remote comment on item 12. >> checking for remote public ment on item 12. and there is no public comment. >> all right. public ment on item 12 is closed. call item 13. why adjournment. >> we are adjourned. clear clear complaints and

not (indiscernible) that concludes today's overview. thank you for your time. >> what happens after a complaint is submitted? when dpa receives a complaint, the first step is it to assign it to a investigator. if the complainant provides contact information, they receive a letter telling them knoo they assigned investigator will be. if the complaint is submitted anonymously they will not receive further contact from dp. >> what happens when dpa finds a police miscucktd? >> the dpa find misconduct, meaning sustain a

complaint, the next step is to determine how serious the misconduct is and what discipline the dpa will request (indiscernible) the dpa does not itself impose discipline and can only recommend discipline in a sustained case. >> what happens if a complaint turninize to a chief nonnob >> if the dpa decides to recommend 10 days suspension or less, the chief of police is the final determner of both whether misconduct occurred, and if the chief agrees misconduct occurred, what the disciplineitary penalty will be. in those cases if the chief disagreewise dpa, the case is over and dpa does not have any recourse. if the chief decides that misconduct occurred, and to

impose discipline, an officer has a right to a hearing before that decision is final. >> what happens if a dpa complaint turns into a commission level case? >> if the dpa determines a 11 day suspension all the way up to termination is the appropriate outcome for a misconduct case, a trial is held in front of the police commission. normally, one commissioner presides over the trial, then the entire commission will read the transcript and vote. if the commission determines misconduct occurs, then the commission also determines what the penalty will be. if you are stopped by a police officer you should follow the officer direction, keep calm, keep still, and do not make sudden movements do not reach for anything, especially in your pockets, keep your

hands visible at all times. you have the right to remain silent. this means you do not have to say anything. tell the officer i want to remain silnts. you have a right to a attorney. tell the officer i would like a attorney. if you are arrested do not talk about your case or immigration status to anyone other then your attorney. do not sign anything without your attorney. do not lie to law enforcement officers and if you are property are being searched make sure i do not consent to the search. do not challenge the officer, you can file a complaint about police services later, if you are not comfortable speaking english you can ask for a bilingual officer who speaks your language and also ask for a interprerererererererere