it sound here they might have scope of work í] design where you produce full archittu that was a helpful clarification. thank you very much. i also then had questions for open to my on i-m and o. these were some of development grant extensions. my question really is just one, is if the pit stop contracts, the trashcon steaming contract and street cleaning contract be /p july 31, 2025 so we don't have to amen them next year for june, the month of june? hello deputy director robertson.

starts july 1 but don't get a budget un for another day why that is a problem. &j commissioner turner.

>> just want to-more of a around those samitems and thof discussion and also want to commend staff a i want to make sure as we continue to really push jj workforce development training and programming, i see mr. hill in has done a tremendous job, pawith deputy director durden to make sure we are clear of our goals with workforct and how impactful they are and how thosme who are stewards of the funds. asize our fiduciary responsibility and the city good stewards, so this is a budgetary kind of quag myer we have best team every year, so i thank you. but i do want to be that these are significant increases and changes for these non profits 7.thneed to be accountable for and that is what i'll look for. do every day, but being dependent upon others we need to make sure ry clear about our expectations,

outcomesi'm grateful, particularly since it has been about 9 engaged and started working, i have seen thing but improvement and think the efficiency with the small amount of money small non profits. my other comments, as we ask-as the commissio we look forward at the end of the 18 mont une on these six contracts and the success, both from the department point of view and we invited them to come back so lo e contract for a full report how everybody thinks they are ing or changed or not changed. >> thank you for that. commissioner turner and commissiondurden team and my team and have cadence and looking at data and approved the analysis. i know friends of the urban forest is here.et with [indiscernible] cyc and hunter po forward producing that report and think

it will be thorough and robust. commissioner zoubi. >> those increases, were all included in the bu >> correct. >> these increases are included in the 10 percent plus 6 cuts that we presented? >> correct. that was a as we are working with the mayor's budget june 1, and then work wg the board of as their review a hold up is we were sure until june 22 what the final number would be. all the reductions that were submitted and approved and accepted of supervisors are included in these amounts and we budget to fully fund the items before you today. >> are we going to have a date of the final final? >> yes. budget staff are working on we issued shortly after the mayor signed in mid-august. we should be on a similar timeline this go-r i have seen preliminary draft. we making

sure no numbers change. >> thank you. >> thank you. commissioner turner reminded me re today. since they took the time and trouble to come to g, did anyone want to come to the podium an"'dont have to, but i like to acknowledge when people make the effort. >> good morning chair post and commissioners, brian friends of the urban forest. my only comment is that, we are looking forward to partner with public works to meet the goals include not only workforce development, training folks in green collar jobs getting placed in permanent full time anting watering and caring for thousands of trees across our city, so i do want to also commend public works the last time i was up here we talked about delays in invoicing and ar for the record we have seen improvement in that from our end ope to continue that positive relationship, particularly wirks accounting team. thank you. thank you for >> did anybody else want to come to the

podium or will i just want to be sure. thank you all for coming. with that, with the changes we mention one item the consent calendar. is there a second? thaichck. thank you. secretary fuller, please open the motion to blic comment. >> members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment in r on the motion to approve item 4, consent calendar and all contained in it, excluding 4b line up against the wall furthest from the door.e chamber, press raise your hand button in the webinar or star 3 on your phone to be recognized. the wireless microphone that is right in the middle there.ng with so many microphones and you have three minutes to speak an30 second warning.

>> thanks very much. just want to make sure i understand. thdewalk inspection repair program is being discussed at a separate >> postponed to our next regular meeting september 9, exactly. got you. okay. not appropriate then to make of it? given the documents are made e on the-- >> [indiscernible] >> it is like to make them in september. >> there is enough members of the organization here i think it makes say something. [indiscernible] helpful support in this. i want to note that th#te description of the ada compliance and the need to update be that. my understanding, there is a sole bidder for this. i should say, disappointed there isn't more outreach to find more bidders fwr this in the event there is a sole bidder. there is discussion of curb ramp instillation, street resurfacing. street resealing.

is a bit in there about making sure that sidewalks are good and curb ramps and everything else are to speck. the reason i bring this up is because, i mentioned before and thank you di78rector short set up meetings with me with city engineers. the current design of the citymeet ada standard and so despite the engineers told me drive ways for anything else and heard here the design of the lip is for drainage the fact remains they are not ada compliant e standard set forth. i'm concerned that we are throwing millions dollars after a single bid and looking at e documents the scope does not include adjusting driveways to be ada compliant. it seems a gr. mentioned again and again, riding down et with things of small wheels one has to vigilant of the quality of the driveway lip, because not only -u regular impassable with the current design and beyond the scope of makes it very dangerous to be riding which we are legally

allowed to do and dangerous to transition we are legally allowed to do because the current definition set fort by city do notuse of the street, desprecognized vehicle class in san francisco. i understand this is moved to later date, buof the project revised to include the grinding down lips to be beveled as specified the ada in section we can actually see those areas ma >> your time is up. not have other in person commenters and there are-no one raised their hand to speak over the phone as that concludes public comment. >> thank you. if there are no more questions, all in favor of approving the calendar say aye, or yes. passes unanimously. and the resolutions will be posted commission's website. secretary fuller, please call the next item. >> turning to the regular

calendar, item 5 is the joint development technical advisory services for sfmta pomodernization project. pr manager and the earthquake safety anre to present the contract odific ioif we can continue using that wireless re >> thank you. chair post, commissi i am here to ine [indiscernible] my colleague from mta will walk througthe presentation about the project in request post. she was curious about the project. it is a hisince this is managed by sathought it was more appropriate for the drether of the e you to the project. my part here is to recommend approval of modification number five.

[unable to hear speaker] this is--under contract with public works and provide consulting service management consulting service mta, and this is request for of $578 thousand to !rtheir existing contract, which would make the entire contract amount 4 mi thousand dollars and we'll extend the services, which incl commercial and technical advisory through 2026, which is 30, 2026. this is-qul think that introduction of and requesfor your with that, i am turning it to

over to [indiscernible] >> good name is director for potrero yard. just to pgive back ground, this is the first pu partnership that is part of a ladollar program that we are referring to as the building progress program, and the first of what we hope are ects to modernize our transit access to san franciscans across the city, as well as allowing us to better meet our mandate to fleet by 2040. talk about what that means. this improves efficiency. i guess i should potrero is a 109 year old bus facility. it is our electric trolley coach facility. it was originally built over a

hundred years ago and was orfor street cars, so it is highly inefficient because we different age of vehicles and maintenance required for the s project envisions not only to consolidate all bus fleet into this one facility, but also conditions for our operations and maintenance staff and then set standard for doing these types of provements at presidio yard and other yards in the future. also a key component, as i mentioned. achieving fully electric fleet by 2040 this helps us kind of start moving achieving that. additionally, by improving this facility, replacing it with a new state of the art able to increase the number of buses that operate out of this fuisility by roughly this says 54 but we that further and looking at joint development as a way of

also serving the community beyond improving transit operations. here you can see a rendering of the potrero yard and you notice a bus facility here, but we are also looking toup to 465 units of affordable and in fact, a portion of the workforc housing that is slated for construction we are looking to also have some x)for mta staff, including those operations and work at potrero yard, again increases efficiency, instead of many staff from long distances at hours where and other partner rt transit agencies are you will see in the foreground is alonet, there is the first phase of affordable housing is=i roughly a hundred units give or take affordable housing planned family housing at that site that would up

the point 4 acres. we are on the edge of districts 9 there are currently 6 transit operate out of potrero yard and i believe i cove already, but again, this is about 109 it is also not-has ?m seismically retrofited, so this is also a way to insure that the building is also safe, both for our afwell as the community. showing on again about 246 electric trolley are slated for storage and operation at means we'll have roughly i believe over 800 staff that will be working on different shifts in the building,may not all necessarily be in the building at the same time, providing ample facilities for them to be able to use and l house our future training facility. i alluded

to, climate action is a important part not just for electrifying our d fleet and improving efficiency of the building this does also meet our equity by improving transit to those that need it the most in the community. this serves communities throughout the citincluding the adjacent hill neighborhood. and then as i mentionedthe affordable housing will actually be not just the bryant street phas will be two additional phases on top of the bus th affordable and workforce looking at 465 total units with beof 776. there have been the unit count throughout the process of going through the environmental review, and part of the reason for that is, initially bryant street housing was seen as senior housing development, which would have included more

with the decision to transition that to a family housing buils did have to redu accommodate larger units, but the overall bedroom es to be consistent. a couple other things that are worth pointing out.of the amenities planned for the new potrero is much requested public restrooms for adjacent franklin square park as several commercial spaces for then in addition, alp# improve ment to the street surrounding this block. in terms of our outreach, i think it is important to note sw part of why we started this project with outreach and in 2018, throughout the process, we have insured that public engagement and public comment has this project

throughout the process. in fact, we ha neighborhood working group that meets monthly on everything going on with the project and theiris again, incorporated throughout. we have a present. the developer team both for the bus yard and the housing are also present in those meetings so had over 150 public meetings an the public to be engaged in the project and provide their feedback. so again, we started ocess back in 2017 and 2018. we first did an rfq for actual public private partner s in the project and then we ultimately bring on potrero neig which is spearheaded by [indiscernible] their office is part of the development team includes those eve enin the mission district who supporting this effort, both in terms of

housing as well as public outreach. our entitlements and review were approved by the board of sors and mta bord earlier this yoor, so we are preparing to re)@le for design build contractor who wird and so we anticipate cu being on schedule to bring that again to the board for approval of the project agreement fallowed by approval of the design build thin 90 days we expect the developer to mobilize to begin decommissioning the site, demolishing the existing structure and construction and so we do anticipate roughly a four from beginning to end where potrero yard would be back online early 2029. with the

where -with that , thank you for your time and i'm available along agestions. >> thank you very much mr. lazaro. good to see you again. i do have questions. which should i do? i will start at the covid pandemic change city. this project was started before the pandemic no one could have predicted. how is post p e of the system and how has that change and design fwr the project if it has? >> thank you for my understanding from our tumlin, transit ridership especially on ny bus routes rebounded nicely. i don't know we fully achieved pre-pandemic ridership accept a few key rounts. one example we exsided is south van i think part of our strategy for

achieving that pre-covid ridership and exceedg these kinds of improvements so we by efficiency and getting the vehicles on the streets for needed maintenance and will definitely support that. again, i think we have been on the see ridership increase, especially including these bus potrero. >> great. thank you. that is good news. 12 years to deliver, which i find excessive. we always want to commend the city on outreach, what you described is this is a neighborhood activist who appreciates and think it is public participate in city government and give feedback, soi don't know if that is what they are demand, but sounds excessive public and could be effecting the timing of this project. day your commission, your bo

considered bringing-delivering the projecere a housing expert runs the show. that one housing delivery departments runs this as housing project where sfmta has the bus yard, more a partnership between entity that knows how to build i deliver housing and expertise how-what is needed in that train i'm sure left the station 12 years i have been hearing about this project a long time and showed it has been discussed a long time and on another 5 years. again, was discussed being primarily a housing project rather then transi >> great questions. couple c the developer team was brought on november 2022, so that off the design process. what has preceded that is again, related to actually detethe needs of the bus yard itself, what is looking for in terms of what kind be willing to accept

in terms of height and how many units is considered acceptable to and so, couple things--so, again with the pre-development phase begin in late 2022, we really in the thick that and so fro2022 through 2029 for the size and scope we are quite on track actually to stick have originally set out for back in 201 facility framework was first developed. as far as the neighborhood working group, i think one thing didn't cover in the presentation, the project beyond the bus yard and the housing. there is also public art, other things that are kind of tied into this projecto insure the public is in th every step of the way, and then as far as question around which direction to start the project from. this had always been envisioned as a project first with any supporting delo

second, because this bus yard is really the key notto improving mta operation across the board, but start a domino future projects that we intend to deliver on a current property that the mta does own and operate and so, the housing was seen as something that the community of course are supportive that and i very much look seeing housing built there as well, but it very much has to be yard first fallowed by the housing. >> i'm not ques >> sure. >> speaking !.housing, you addressed the conversion from senior to families, but the dire situation of housing in san francisco, particularly the past ouand few months it ramped up and can't seem to build too project looking building more housing in the 465 units?we need more and this might be a place to put something since t thhasn't been built yet? entitled to 465 housing units and based on the ongoing outreach, as well as the work that the been doing

over the past couple years to figure feasible financially, the 465 is really pretty much at can be accommodated here. that being said, again, future sites that also we are looking development opportunities there to incorporate housing on future sites, but that is what can be accommodated there today. >> i realize the decision is made and late to the party and fully aware that, but i'm a taxpayer and citizen of the i'm still unclear, but think you tuesday public engagement, maybe covid, all of the above i would like to ask,how have expectations on this projecwhat is learned along the way and what are you asparticularly dismayed about and have any of those effected the project? >> i'll just mention, i think again e community throughout this process has

really shown through in the fact that when we went to both the the board of supervisors earlier this year with entitlements our environmental review, that that y without any opposition. there was no appeal pwe believe that was due to the fact e community and the public at large involved at every step of the way. we continue to post all the updates on our website.a e-mail list that goes out every a new out there and drafted and try to stay in front of the communication through every step and we believe that is paying off in terms of the support we are seeing for e project. >> anything that hasn't gone well we are benefit from? looking for lessens learned that could be applied to city projeblths. >> i think i have to get back to you. the fact we are fairly close to out for i think is a good sign. >> great is a very high profile project. a verygood

project. i'm excited to see it completed so thank you for coming and speaking with us. commissioner turner. pick up where commissioner post left, which is, i'm amazed. i have been on vacation in the the country and was so eager cause of all the amazing things we do and this is one of the projects. i'm not other yards outside hudson yard in new york where le are from how do we of tight communities, transform the communities through projects, unlike new york, we are delivering as affordable and workforce housing reflective of the community and need.. i'm proud to see how the took advantage of valuable land v4and throughout how to take advant age of i have a couple things. as we get moving through this. there is i think a really important point chair post is is, scale replication and also the

uniqueness of some -of coming to us and we are happy to make sure our role is really clear, and that often happens is people lose sight 06 who i thank outreach and trying to make sure folks know what the project is important and encourage our team to make sure it is means and the role we are playing, because with many multiple projects, i think about the civil grand jury report and those projects are so unique and how challenging sometimes one off and are delivered every last one proud to be partnered with you and will be good stewaand very accountable and have to point out challenges as where we can scale and replicate. i got my eye on a couple police stations, a fire station and others i love to see housi particularly workforce housing to bring police officers and reofficers, bring emergency officers all back to the city the every day,

so i thank you and look foto make sure this is a replicable project for public works. >> thank you. the presentation. pretty big project and it hits two one stone. my question is, is there a place n go maybe online or the community input, rather then just i can see there is outreach.a talks to the neighborhood, e these meetings every month, but is there a place-like any resident of san francisco can go and look the input of the community? like what are they afraid of if like it and what do they like, is there a place can mments? >> thank you. we for the potrero yard project where we co"t to post everything, historically from the project and all of our

meeting minutes from all hood working group meetings, as well as all the documents again to ceqa and entitlements are all there.we also proactively go out to in fact, we will be doing more this fall and always making sure that we give people in the public an rtunity to share if there are things they have questions about xor concerns about, that we address those either person or on the website in some way. >> for majority of the neighborhoods they have are there letters from these associiog or not approving or giving input feedback or just minutes of the meeting? >> many letters were submitted in entitlements and environmental review, but also we ie earlier this spring and received letters of of the community, friends of frag

others, so yes, absolutely. >> thank you. my last question is, there were fourthe past five years. should we anticipate up soon or next year? how do you the project and do you think there will be a need for more modification for this? >> this should be the we will be moving into the project next year and so there will be a separate agreement withfor advisory services that agreement so this will be the last for that. >> >> you said sfmta is project manager of this project? >> we have a-this is a p3, so we a-the potrero neighborhood collective will be more or less overseegn build contractor, but that will be in partnership with sfmta, yes. >> potrero neighborhood collective. what is that? ouping of all of the

[indiscernible] lead developer and so they will actually be issuing the design build contractor rf that contractor directly for delivery of the d, but of course, because that will be bus yard, we will be involved ever step of the way. familiar with maerb. america. >>they are large company. a local who is the team on the project. >> thank you very much. director shx-áwort, will public work role be in this project? will also have management responsibility as well so in partnership with the mta to and we helped lead the pre-development phase. f i don't think i knew that, so thank you very much. that's if there are no further questio comments on this--i'll second to --no it is contract

modification, so i'll second that motion.motion to modify the contract. thank you very mr. lazaro and open public comment. >> members of the public who comment in person on the motion to approve item ent technical advisory services dufor sfmta potrero yard modernization, may line up against the door. if you are chamber, press the raise your hand button in the webinar or star 3 on your phone to you will have three minutes to speak. use the middle wireless microphone that might be easier for you you will get a 30 notice with your time >> great. look frgward to this. thank you for yo really lovely. commission city where public works and municipal transare one agency. something i continue to come back to

that there is so much extra work being done, so many spent and siloed conversation because you different commissioners and two if you consider the split here and so ends up getting replicateed and po split. showing on the screen, group of me and my friends in of a bus with skateboards. you can 4 bikes $onbut you can fit as many skateboards as you can people.t clear in the discussion is the sidewalks and not there is opportunities for invasion there. i appreciate all the i think that is really great.bus and sidewalk and everything else are addressed in the documents on e website just mentioned. i took a look at it. just want to note opportunities for public works to engage as far as curb design especially considering accessible of low income people and people in continue with [indiscernible] continue to limit access given how timeline, given insistence on climate mitigation, gichben [indiscernible] a feature focused reducing carbon intensity.

as i said, designing with small wheelicize a way to encourage multi-modal a ses and reduce carbon emission and older people access to transit. seattle is working on this. working on beveled edgeto loading zones in and out of mobility lane. i argue that a ÷"softel is more important. noted in the design, we dont have yond any sort of tree basin such it could be used passing lane outside the main thoroughfare of the sidewalk. again, this area here could be widened be more accessible. just noting here, what is in the design right now, linear protected bike lanes. love to see that adjusted, love to see more accessibility brought into the conversation. with regard to thpublic outreach, i ocontinue to show up to conversations like this ansee distinct difference between the mta stated in outreach and actual ability to be in

the middle of their day to make an you for your comments. not have any further in person commenter jz any callers who expressed inest interest in this item so public comment. >> thank you. motion, all in favor of the contract modification for the potrero yard modernization project say aye or yes.the contract modification resolution will be postedthe commission website. it is now 1027. break at 1040 to i anticipate the zuckerberg10 or 15 minutes, yet i don't want to delay. with apology to mr. chen and his item 6 now please and sorry you will to be interrupted along the way, but i like to keep moving. >> item san fr5 seismic up

grade and renovation and projecr joe chen will present this contract modification. it an action item. >> testing. vice chair zoubi, commissioner turner. my name joe chen, public works program health and safety bond program joined by [indiscernible] department of public health.[indiscernible] jackson, interim deputy officer, capital project oversight advisor and jason capital on the zuckerberg san francisco general b5il5 seismic up grade and renovation contract.

sorry. public works is requesting commission consideration and approval to increase to the contract cost and duration contingency and authorito approve future modification for this contract. the revised at 94 million, 662 dollars and 9 cents which includes all approvedblic works is requesting commission pl to increase the construction cost contingency by 25 million 923 thousand 76 dollars. the duration by 572 public works requesting approval to increase thcompletion of the bidding and buy out and execution ofch to complete the projects. all project included is in

building 5 located on the caat 1001 potrero avenue the project clients for this funding for the project is provided by the 2016 public health and safety bond program. dph levefrom the 2020 health recovery bond program general funds as well as sfgh foundation gift donation funds. the bureau architecture with public works in lbe architectural firm. public works targfor all projects by second quarter 2026. all projects included are part of the 2016 building 5 component. the scope of work is rt of dph long-term plan to convert building 5 new outpatient care consolidated specialty clinics on or off campus to unlike more typical e ontract is asked to deliver 6

[indiscernible] one of the typical proj allows public works to select a not based on lowest price but finding most qualified based on project experience and approach to be in the position to be most successful. the six projects seismic up grade, recaention, public health laboratory, it infrastructure, psychiatric emerand clinical laboratory. selected because of the complexity of hospital construction. the need bord prior to construction start for complicated phasing logistics and inspection control plans performed reviews and investigation as well as develo the seismic upgrade enlargement and work scope coordinated oing construction activities for lab, pes and

by utilizing the method, we are working with one general contractor able to plan construction activities for all projects which avoids the you are working with multiple general contractors that a common project site. all the tasks are performed as part of pre-construction prior to construction start. two slides provide a status update of all six projects. go through each project, but let me mention a few keylights. you get a of different level. lab is target completion by third quarter 2024.ure and pes, seismic ap grade is most rcent based on location completed. more then ppy to complete seismic, remaining locations are the most challenging, because the team focused building out the new two foot [indiscernible] pes main renovation is the ft public works

issued construction on may 13, 2024. summary of the construction cost and contract tion contingency based on change orders. the contract is 86 million, 410 thousand, 253 dollars. change orders total 8 million, dollars and 9 cents which leaves and 91 cents remaining cost contingency reserves.s are not adequate to complete the project. the original construction duration is 1429 calendar which equates to final completion date 7, 2024. even though public works has not extension to date, not expect to complete the last project until seconquarter 2026. public works requesting approval to increase the duration contingency of 572 calendar days which result

in duration of 2144 calendar days orders to extend public works request approval to increase 25 million, 923 thousand, 76 dollars which result in authorized contract cost limit of million, 974 thousand, 334 dollars. provides a summary- has a hard stop at 11. i wanted to know if he had anything to say to the commission before we take our break? >> sure. mr. primo, you want to come up? >> sorry to cut madam chair, commissioners, mack primo, a oversight advisor for director of to give insight how we cisions within public health. veloped as part of retreat we go on frequently with dph

leadership and about 50 to rs from both campuses as well as amvelop something we call, safe building igns us with the city cpc capital plan, and soreally granular 10 year capital plan specifically on buildings, upcoming bond issues, what's in the bond ish the capacity has and how we competing with the all the other departments in the city. on the 2016 bond that joe was referring to, ckground on that. 2015 and the ask time was $535 million so the bond was 350 ared by three departments so the zuckerberg 222 million even though the estimate wacatching up and thank god we have the san francisco who is embarking on $220 mpgn,

specifically for building 5 and those buildings that support building 5. also, we grant work. jason is here the executi project manager and can talk about a huge grant we got from the state. these things and we do m to make decisions we did an analysis. madam chair, i can't remember when. s and compared renovating the building to achieve what we needed to do versus building. the 330 renovate or $1.3 billion to do a new one. the others if we took it down we would have about mth ceqa process and so by keeping it there a voluntary structural upgrade, gea categorical exemption, so that is paperwork and we the schedule. the other operational issues critical to keep four things func that is psych emergency service, the the new building but not in the new

building that supplies food, the pharmacy and then-joe, what is the other function? so, they all support each other even though they are two structures.we built and finished in 2015 we are renovatingism there is you haven't been out there it is insightful to goand see the flow of the physicians and nurses and work and radiology and everything else that has to take place between so the decision was to keep it, because we don't estate available at this point on the 2 after the ucsf transactional research we have very little space to do anything, sowere to take it down, build new, we have to do temporary pharmacy, temporary facilities that would just go away when the we are throwing the money y so we made a decision to keep it. we were locked that is a example how we look at each decision. we currently have been working with the

mayor office and controller and on composition of 2024 bond that is being proposed by the ma supervisor peskin for november, so with the alignment put into each of these things. if th a hard stop. you have a hard stop. >> thank you. that was very helpful and thank you for asking the qu't tear it down. for mr. primo before we take our break? thank you so much. velpful. thank you. we will now til-let's plan for 11. let's plan for thank you. [recess until [meeting reconvened]

>> we are back in session. thank you for the wait and thank you mr. chen for we appreciate it. please continue with your presentation. >> thank you.you commissioners. as i mentioned earlier, the next slide is a graphical summary of the contract duration coningeancy calculation.approved contingency of in this contract, it was planned to stagger because [indiscernible] received plan whether the construction contract and start pending completion [indiscernible] the bottom 6 show the duration in yellow and blue bar the

complete the projecre two yellow bars because the project separate separately permitted projects. the first started november 2021 and the hazardous material abatement [indiscernible] the second is main re the project team decided to lessens learned from past projects.te the demolition scope first. eleminate concerns regarding unforeseen conditions and [indiscernible] we have seen in other pr for example, after the completion of demolition, proceeding with early scopes to floating scanning and new wall layout.y, the team was able to identify conflerebar prior to construction start and t developing drawing revisions needed to avoid the conflicts. this was a huge schedule impact where over 60 percent of the new walls with existing floor conditions. the main renovation project anned to start construction much later then the other

project because was still in the project did not receive plan approval until july 2023. the early demolitioproject completed october 2023. [indiscernible] also delayed because the rehab department relocation prope of work for this contract. this project manage works and awarded to bill group as the general contractor.project were driven by combination ndns, existing conditions that were identified as code compliant and [indiscernible] damaged by a contractor. these issued project completion. requesting for increase to the cost and duration cause of cost and time reconciliation, higher bid prices and change orders. [indiscernible] cost and contract structure is based on cost by public works during the request for proposal phase. once the cmgc is unboarded and and

trade packages bid out to the trade of the project are finalized. there is inherent process to true up and reconcile the difference between the cost estimate and bid prices. the higher bid prices public ed for all the projects necessitated the need for dph difficult decisions regarding project that were part of the contract. [indiscernible] removed from by a contractor selected in the future.funding limitations, the health center is phased to proceed with demolition first. the project is in the bidding phase and targeting to award the bid build contract the third quarter 24. [indiscernible] also placed on hold during design until can be identified. public works is working sign of the project and targeting to proceed to construction by 2026 2027. cost reduction measure was reduction of the scope for the it infrastructure. the original scope for is

infrastructure including the build ouf . out new electrical low voltage infrastructure for the [indiscernible] for existing and new teledata rooms. oject was determined to be higher priority as needed to nctionality of existing and new teledata rooms. dph is identifying strategy to implement the electrical and ltage scopes in the phased manner and possibly incorporate into project scopes. of the 25 million increase to approximately $9 million is needed to complete the pts and it infrastructure. the remaining 16 milfor public received and not approved future change order ringe to project completion.72 calendar day increase to duration contingency is needed completion of seismic upgrade and pes targeted to achiev second quarter of 2026. project team is always tr our cost estimate to be able to more accurately forecast brilding

working with operational iscernible] unforeseen conditions, [indiscernible] existing code issues make it challenges.factors contractors increase pricing for perceived protect themselves. the project team is trying to minimize--for example, working existing buildings one greatest concern is whether design is ased on constraints above ceiling. designers typically use drawing to map possible routes for piping and duct work in the always acaret. accurate. and not does show the space in three dimension.with cmcg for field investigation to the extent possible to better map out the existing above ceiling conditions as well as using laser scanning provide as built computer model tuesday share with trade contractor which reduce cost that trade contractors include in the bid pric uncertainties. another strategy is team a

separately permitted project as a way to minimize risk. [indiscernible] tends to help reduce bid pricing. of trade contractors willing to work in hospital construction, to outreach to trade contractors to talk to them and garner ects. more trade contractors willing to subm competitive prices. depending on the scope of work, public works is work wg better control cost and manage these perceive eme bid price. public works and dph more operational constraints will increase the bid pricing, so possible, public works is working with dph to identify complete enabling projects that relocate uion start to minimize increase cost associated with and reduce labor productivi at this point, i know mr. the question regarding whe versus replacement. i went go into more detail and questions you

have regarding a8that topic. the last slide is just reminder of why public works is here tod public work requesting consideration to approve increase to contract contingency ) approve future modifications and that concludes my presentation for today answer questions you may have. thank you. >> thank you very much for your presentation and we also wanted to thank you all three of us for last week's the construction site and all the multiple d today. the difficulty of ngtruction work safely and efficiently in a setting and extensive site mitigation to put it mildly. punt intended, but the surgical precision public works and contractors keep the hospital safe and clean was it was a shock. a pleasant shock, but a shock.also want to thank you and complement you on the excellen that

you prepared describing complex construction project, the staff memo inthe meeting. it was excellent. and again, thank you answering the questions i sent ahead of time. you uded to a number of been learning along the way that can t a fine point on it because i know i you managed non-hospital projects as well. what lessens learned are there some that you just want to point out that through the zuckerberg project tied to other public works projects overall city client? >> thank you for the question chair post. that's a excellent question. have the magic bullet and all issues will thin when it comes to managing renovation projects in general it br uncertainty and concern and i think a lot of time designers am tends to rush into design immediately to construction.

i think what we learned just sometimes the long run to take the effort to field investigation. extent possible. the reason i to extent possible, because a lot of spaces in the hospital are occupied very difficult to go and open ceiling, cut do investigation while the space is use by staff and patients.it is delic the client department and do research and we do our best to look gs that changed, go out to the field. i think it does make in the effort to do additional field investigation where we can avoid these surprises is typically what delays project. >> thank you. it reminds me project, we couldn't move everybody out there. they had emergency calls. there are a lot off in the room and nice to hear what transferred to other clients project. i want to thank you. increase to project cost and contingency

the original contract award, which is considerable but you have given why the projected cost turned out to be such odds mate, so i thank you for that.i am satisfied with that so thank you. commissioner turner. , i believe is ongoing plan for $300 million bond this project and if expands the scope of project meaning more then likely come back assuming bond issuance is successful? >> um, i think-yes, there is still a plan to issue the bond. as i understand it details of how some would be spent is still being finalized, i'm not sure--as mark primo mentioned, there is pital campaign underway by the friends of-don't know if that is the right term. zuckerberg. i don't know the answer at this time. i don't know knows whether that

bond resources into this project. i know-okay, project manager are different buildings bond would support. >> commissioner zoubi. >> i k and thank you for the of the hospital building 5, and showed me exact example of $@changing engines mid-flight, but i everything was organized and again, i blove the partnership with public health anyou are working together with them.ask a break-down of $25 million and the other night i i ask just ask? so thank you for that. i just want to ask the question as commissiur we already started those six projects, we already hit the ground, start working.d we expect another either

extension or increase in the next 6 to >> commission zoubi, thank you for the question. we know today, we don't anticipate coming back itional approval. this approval if approved commission does include future change orders built based what +:the current projects. we have all most complete so minimum riskism clean lab a couple months so we already have a smaller the one project that just start which is pes psychiatric emergency service, so we carried a larger contingency, so our plan based on what we know e cards on the table, be sufficient to allow us to ongect. thongect. project. >> thank you very mitch. a motion-did anyone wah to the podium and add a word to what mr. you

have taken the time and trouble to come to the meeting. you dont have to. you can handle it? okay. that we approve this great. thank you there is a motion to approve and second. please open the motion to public comment. e public who wish to make three minutes of comment in person on the approve item 6, the zuckerberg san francisco 5 seismic upgrade line up against the wall. co press the raise your hand button in the webinar or star 3 on your be recognized. it does not appear we have on this item, is indicating we do not have callers either so that conclude >> thank you. if no other favor of the motion please say aye or yes. aye. the contract modification resolution will be posted

to commission's website. thank you very much again mr. chen. the item from the consent calendar postponed another zuckerberg hospital item, 4h. item is rg different general hospital building rehab department relocation phase 3 contract modification and this originally on the consent calendar, but be heard individually.ect manager lindsey who is here toprint print esent the report. 4n. >> good morning everyone. vice chair zoubi, commissioner turner, director short and attorney. my name is lindsey who, project manager with san today i'm here to present the zsfg building 5 rehab department relocation phase 3 construction contract 'ç i had the pleasure meeting a few of you eek. this isn't a project we toured

so i'll give ion. today we are seeking approval to increase the contingency as well as the duration contingency for the rehab project. the original approved contract amoun is 4 million, 103 th54 cents. today we are seeking approval 559 thousand, 624 dollars and 395 consecutive calendar days. contractor is klw construction and the reason this will allow us fl future change orders incl comple the project. the department of public health. funded by the 2016 plth and safety bond. we are also receiving additional funding resources from the sfgh foundation grant and gift doimation. donation. the architect of record bureau architecture:constructor is

isto substantial completion. ted completion date was april 25, 2024. wed a more traditional design bid the scope is in to all the other projects mr. oor. phase 1 and phase 2, the the plan area shown in the light blue. current work of phase 3 is highlighted in yellow and includes th new out-patient urology clinic, waste holding area and new accessible restrooms. currently 51 percent complete with ouwork areas, urology area has the working on waste holder area is working on the partition wall instillation. the 3a accessible restroom is ongoing and have framing instillation and 3c accessible restrooms are just starting th

our construction barriers. here is mmary of the contract amount. the original construction million, 730, 831 dollars. the approved change orders to e 1-3 totaled 258 thousand, 417 dollars for total revised contract amount of--sorry, that is a error.$9 million. the approvthe original contract and remaining is 114 for the contract duration, the duration of substantial completion and final completion was 550 with approved reserves of 55 days. we have not approved any to date. for today is an additional reserve of 15 percent of 559, thousand for authorized contract limit of million, 663 thousand,

for the construction duration, we are asking for of 395 days for total duration and projected final comp of may 20 this slide helps summarize the changeor executed to date. 1-3 totaling 258, 417 dollars of 329 thousand. sorry, 123 thousand. 123 conditions of a client request and code related issue of thound. as you see on the right, we do a all the change orders that go into our oval process.

two design specifically requested was one that was project was bid out between phase 1 and phase 2, there were missing drawings from the set. they were separa and so piping was missing the original bid set and added as a cost 83 thousand, 754. the other design error was a lights.-r it was found it was not additional and needed to two exam rooms one of the major additional change orders we r e that we approved but not yet executed exceeds 10 percent limit is the time extension due unforeseen conditions related to conditions, framing conditions, mold, as well as hand over from occupancy that delayed the construction process. that to 211 calendar days, with 133 of those days being compensable and associated cost

of $163.324.highlighted before working, very campus. renovation projects in general are much mow construction, but when you are trying to keep a impact to the hospital, it could further complicated and often chceed the 10 percent construction cost or construction duration contingenci we have ex1970 building, reinforced concreate that require expertise in scanning and delays. there is many conditions relatesed to mechanical electrical and plumb and architectural components. we have environmental health procedures and infection control plans can delay the start of the work.particular,b the rehab phase 3 started days after due to work plan. and lastly, we are under risdiction of

the healthcare organization information. this additional oversight through material operations. we have field review from the field staff officersoversight from the inspector of record.ract modification will allow public works to continue complete the work. in summary, again, today we seeking increase contract cost and duration $559.624.71 and 395 consecutive calendar thank you. >> thank you very much. nice to see you agand again, thank you for taking us through last week. i really appreciate how quickly you pulled together the presentation after learning late la you answered all my questions and thank you very much. i thought it nice complement to mr. chen's presentation, went together very nicely.we go back to page 22?

page 22. >> we don't have presentation in - >> it should be a . >> thank you. it was and the page, the break-down of the reasons is something i would love to see future presentation for all presentations we get. this is--so, we asked all these questions. what is going on? why is there extension of time?up, please? i'm showing it on my computer. >> yeah, on >> this is great. you even worked on the extension, how long that cost.ch that will cost the project. this is-i commend you on this. i haven't seen this before and like to make request any extension and increase future to have this.eakdown, so we-anyone

now can look at this and say okay, i get it. thank you. >> no problem. our dpw public works team cm a good job tracking and vetting all the change orders.through rigorous analysis. we don't approve them easily and have backup documentation. >> i share commissioner zoubi's good point about continuing to see this. if you can bring up one more page 22.s listed on the left, start this regularly and tracking it we can see trends how often is the client requested delays how often uncothe civil grand jury criticized the department for number of issues and we will always need to be able to respond to criticism when we can say we are tracking the reasons for ll always admit when it is public works mistake so need to always understand when

it is out of anyone's control, unforeseen condition and the like.is client request. i are agree, this eat table to see in reports going forward. commissioner turner. >> just be clear, is oduced as >> it is from the construction management group. they we have final numbers have a projection. t%review process. if it is above a threshold we have a third party estimator to eare view it and onceeach change order is tagged with a type from design omission or design requested change unforeseen condition is the t mon, code changes, we also have categories that are a result of in the panko contract of cmgc or preconstruction, a item miss used for contiancy, so typically maybe not exactly the t the teams are tracking it through an

excel log. i just want to echo my colleagues, because i think if we think performance metric you can use these commissioner zoubi and don't know if you [indiscernible] but i do think these are those you would see fluctuations given they are utilizing the software can help us consolidate the information d you and think that is a great idea. >> thank you. if there are no more comments, i will this contract modification. is is there great. please open this em to public comment, secretary fuers of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment in person motion to approve item 4n, originally on thconsent calendar, the zuckerberg san francisco building rehab department relocation phase 3 against the wall. enting outside the chamber, press raise your hand or star 3 on your phone to

no one approached to speak in person and thany callers who ther, so that concludes public comment on item 4 and the motion to approve it. >> thank you. there is no further discussion or favor of the motion please say aye or yes? aye.motion passes and the contract modification is approved. coming today and the resolution will be posted to secretary fuller, please call our next item of business. to designate authorize the commissioner to the civil grand jury report from june chair post has volunteered to draftand will discuss this action and this is an >> thank you. secry fuller noted as you all know the commission has been requested to respond to findings and recommendations in the civil grand jury report. to do so, but it is just request, but of course we will do so. what i was going to propose is up

a proposed response from the commission our retreat next monday the 29 will discuss the grand jury report among ourselves and then we can discuss our response this request and so, i can with secretary fuller and we can return by the august 19 deadline since we won't again between july 29 and the august 19 deadline. but we are not planning to meet again between it is an ambitious goal for but i intend to meet it. that is what is going on here and we thought this would be nice to ly designate me to draft response subject to your approval at next meeting. commissioner turner. >> chair post, i different then the delop a letter around street conditions and we are grateful that you got our consensus and developed a letter and believe issued so that is the same process we are

following here and be the process we follow here, given it is [indiscernible] on behalf of the commission, so i just move , we approve you drafting necessary and apto the civil grand jury. i second that motion. >> thank you. we'll take public comment on the motion, please. >> members of the public who comment in person on the motion to designate ize chair post to respond to civil grand jury report may li press raise your han or star 3 on your phonebe recognized. eak and we do not have t in speaking either. >> thank you. favor of the motion please say aye or yes. it carries. thank you very murch.

much. good. next is new business. secretary fuitem. >> item 8 is new mmissioners and this is a opportunity for commissioners to suit is a informationa >> thank you. i do not have new business. any ofeagues have new business to initiate? hearing none, please open this item to public comment. >> members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment on item initiated by commissioners may line up against if commenting from outside the chamber, press raise your hand button in the webinar or star 3 on to be recognized. we do have one commenter you have three minutes to speak.have anything to present? >> i like to offer that and rolling plan by the mta has not presented to this commission. i love to be proven wrong, my understanding

is after a year of community outreach, if yet to discuss what that really looks like. i argue neshould include a call by public works to request presentation from the people who are putting that to discuss it, especially given the fact it is a currently curb to curb program and does not include any new for sidewalks. to that same enthis commission should have some sensitivity tosmall wheel access. i'm excited and look forward putting in a application for it because i missing from this space. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. it does we have any other inperson commenters and there are nowho have requested to speak on this >> thank you.l goes into closed session and do not anticipate further session so staff doesn't have to hang around if they dont i will note, as i mentioned we

will be a week from today, monday the 29 off-site. ita informal retreat rather then a meeting and it the pupublic works commission response to the civil grand jury public infrastructure delivery. our next regular meeting sinee at the end summer monday september 9. i wish everybody pleasant summer until then. alrighty. yes, do i hear a motion and second >> so moved. >> alright. and then given the moy6ti >> members of the who wish to comment on the motion to enter closed session to #the director's evaluation may line up against the wall furthest from the commenting from outside tyour hand or star 3 on your phone to be recognized. speak on this item and we do not have any this time, so that concludes public comment. >> alright.

hearing no further questions or comments, all in favor closed session say yes or aye. alrighty. members of the public and staff not part of the ing room and we'll take a few minutes for [meeting reconvened] >> entered-exted closed session. please call the next item on >> item 10 is announcement following ank you. there are no announcements following the closed sessioary fuller, please open this item to public comment. mbers of the pub lic who wish to comment on item announcement following closed session may line up against the the door. commenting outside the chamber press raise your or star 3 on your phone to no one approached and no k on it either, so that concludes public comment. item on the agenda. >> item 11 is regarding whether to disclose discussion

during closed session. >> thank you. disclose the discussion heard during closed session. is there a sec >> second. >> thank you. please open the blic comment. >> members f the public who wish to comment on there motion to not disclose discussion during closed session may line up against the wall an the chamber, press the raise your hand button in 3 on your phone to be recognized. we have to speak on this item, and no one is on the eak either, so that concludes public comment. >> thank you. all in favor of the motion to not disclose discussion of closed session say aye or yes. the motion passes unanimously. and i believe secretary fuller we do item, item 12, the general public comment, correct? >> thatnot necessary. >> great. we are now thank you for lpingtook so long. thank you very much. [meeting adjourned] 7á>> my name

is jamieho episode, we are featuring the romantic park locations in your very own backyard. this is your chance to find your heart in san francisco with someone special. our first look out is here atbuena vista park a favorite with couples and it is as old as its neighbor and forest life. the pass meander we do under a canopy of 0, pine, and eucalyptus. chill out an environment

and you might see butterflies, dandelions. blue jays between the eucalyptus. it is accessible. six, 24, or 71 bus. have conquered the steps we walked dogs, and we have enjoyed a beautiful view the park has to offer.s the place to take someone special and enjoyed a beautiful l" come to corona heights, te of this district. it offers a spectacular skyline, the bay bridge, and the east bay. secrets. unlike t peaks, it is hardly ever crowded. on any given into a few locals. hop on a 37 to get there with that any parking their dogs to run with other dogs. there also grass for small dogs. >> it is a great place.

city to pr of parks. the dog owners appreciate it. >> take t to notice the wildflowers on the grassland. the lookout for hawks and other bird camera and be prepared to review the city in a way it is prominent with beautiful watch the sunrise from the this is another one of our at mount davidson. it has the highest point of san francisco 928 feet. bring someone special. enjoy all of the pathways, trails, and greenery that it provides a peaceful oasis of public o and great hiking trails. the spectacular view offers a perfect place to watch sunrise, or sunset, with someone you love. a good place to get away from the hectic life fresh air.

the view is fantastic. >> wear sturdy shoes to conquer the trail,you have the feeling of being in davidson is also a great place to escape then the city with your partner. -- bustleof the city with your partner. 0njdit is quite a hike to the top at mount davidson but the view is every step. this is the place to for more informat reserving one of these romantic locations, or anylocation, 831-5500. ovens weddings the county for building. for any athletic field and neighborhood parks, call 5510. you can also write us atations. or walking in and say hello at old log golden gate park.

information at sfrecpark.org. work on that ismy new. high masa fund. ambitious. that's why i b was a good.

you were. this is you, that ambition you got. oh. you know so there's liquid inside. thank you. i my. oh. no problem. yeah. better that. good. how are you? and of the arts commission on monday, august 5th,4. may i ask everyone, including my, se on silent? yes. okay