$m i francisco public works commission. today is monday, it is ÷ . commissioner turner is present. paul wool absent. fady zoubi, pre with three members present . public commentaken for #f informational and action items. to comment in please the wall, near the sce for members of the public wishing to comment on an ring room, you may do so by joining webinar 2 of and to be recognized please select the raise your hand icon in the webinar. you may also comment from outside the chamber by dialing 415-655-0001 the meeting 7685476 #, # again

and to raise your hand to speak press star 3. the telephone log in information is also available on of today's agenda. commenters may speak for up to three minutes per item and you will 30 second notice when your speaking time is about to expire. in the event we have many commenters on an item, the chair may reduce the public comment time to less then three minutes per person. unless you are speaking under general public comment, please note you must limit your comments to the topic of the agenda item discussed. if commenters do not stay on topic the chair may interrupt and ask to limit comments to the item at hand.public comment made in a civil respectful manner and refrain from profanly. abusive or hate speech will not please direct your remarks to commission as a whole not individual commissioners or staff. the public is always well come to submit comment in writing

publicworks.commission@sfdpw.org or by mail to 49 south van ness avenue, suite 1600, san on behalf of the commission, to sfgovtv building management and media service staff helping make this meeting possible. chair post. >> thank you. before calling the next item, i like to amend today's agenda. i like to change s on consent calendar. staff requested item 4b, the sidewalk inspection postpone to the next regular meeting september 9. further, i like to move item 4h, l engineering team for not 4h. pardon me. i beg your pardon.

4n, the san francisco contract modification to the regular calendar right after the other item about zuckerberg on the regular calendar item 6. suggest we hear the regular item and afterwards take up 4n. do colleagues have any questions or objections to that move? great. thank you very much. alrighty. hearing nothing else, we will move to my announcements as well as yours and secretary fuller's. i have first, i live in the east cut neighborhood south of street between embarcadero and second street.nth i received a news letter aprizing of the folsom street project along folsom between [indiscernible] combine would road paving an pedestrian and bike safetym provements. this commission briefed on this major capital project and approved

the contract for it.commend public works public information officer for excellent news letter to residents businesses non profits and other property owners and occupants this large important project over the next two plus years. there will be many inconveniences and hassles but to receive this thorough description of the project, including the helpful information what i should expect in the months to come n. director short, was this news letter dated june 25 typical of the notification public works sends to effected properties in the vicinity of infrastructure projects or was this a special case? >> good morning. carly short. director. thank you for the question, chair post. glad you were pleased with the news letter. that is typical for the outreach performed for significant capital projects and particularly if there are changes to the schedule or

unexpected items we definitely try to proactively, but i would describe that as typical, yes. >> great. thank you. and thank you again tothe communication department announcement is to call out june nees letter in the works. a interesting document. it started with deep dive to annual sand removal at ocean beach briefed on by director short. featured video footage of the machinery and work required in the short window of time. public works universal operating engineer shifted ththe great highway to be added back to the beach. in the works also showed the public works department in june annual float department staff with massive cleaning crew that up at the parade late into the night. the news letter launch of computer game for children to

teach and give appreciation for diverse works of public works to maintain public spaces. minnesota street scape improvement project the public works commission wreefd on in the summer upgrading access to the lush and beautiful knhunty created and maintained public amenity featureed. also featured public works employees and [indiscernible] to restore and paint 32 landposts sprucing up this important boulevard and making more weplcoming and finally, june love our city neighborhood and clean up work was profiled in district 11. that concludes announcements. do my colleagu have questions or announcements of their own? secretary fuller do uhave announcements today? >> i have onle brief announcement and that is my repoitation and streets commission, who they hemeeting on july 15 and that meeting including a report from bureau urban forestry on

performance measures for the fisc 2023 through 2024. as well as update about the racial equity action plan and that next meeting will be is september 16 wiclude a report from the bureau et repair on their performance measure and that is my only announcement this morning. >> thank you. if no further announcements, please open public comment on this item. >> members of the public who wish to comment on announcements by the chair, commissioners and secretary may agai from the door. if you're commenting from outside the amber, press the raise your hand button in the webinar, or star 3 on be recognized. and we do have one member of the public who has come forward to speak on this item, and do you have something that you need to project? okay.

sfgovtv, if we can have if you can introduce yourself affiliation and you have three minutes to speak and i'll provide a 30 second notice. >> hello commissioners, director. you mentioned something i think i can respond to here. my name is adam, do skateboards and small wheel device, that crut like. you mentioned project so that is worth noting. earlier this month the [indiscernible] dolores street. event no permit holder. i will this more during public comment. it is notable the city coordinated cross departmental fortunate to shut down dolores street public. the entire street was blocked 21 to 18 using more then 400 barricades provided by dpw. here is a image what hay like. they are the entire

sidewalyou can see it looking southbound. this is copy of the letter that sent and included dpw notifying everybody of the large order barricades. there is a screen shot the invoice, 401 barricades totalin$6 thousand. here is the very expensivlation. can't count the number police officers here. setting them up and guarding all day and breaking them down. here is a person with a cane trying to navigate those barricades. walking down from 20th street all the you can see they have to go around the barricades in order to get access to public right of way. so, i'm not sure any communication kage or make people reasonably safe, fwut it is important to note there was absolutely no communication to the public and this infrastructure project no how

temporary definitely cost the city at least a hundred thousand dollars. thank you. 9 >> thank you for that is the only in-person commenter and we do not have anyone who called in so that public comment. >> thank you. please call the next item. the director's public works director carla short is cj here to present and this is a informational item. >> good morning commissioners. carla short, director. we have a full ag a few items i wanted to bring to your first up, recap of pride. also respner zoubi request for information. sunday june 30 concluded a tivities with the internationally fan francisco pride parade. i believe public works is very much backbone of this incredible event. staff for many bureaus and

divisions are focused on the downtown and civic center areas before, during and after the parade to insure that the ? public right of way is n,accessible for the 10s of thousands ofers. beginning weeks before the parade, the crews are filling potholes and construction management team in contact with contractors to insure construction sites in the area are clean and the public right of way is safe. our bureau street use and mapping inspector walk the whole te and visitor areas to insure there are no draw up hour by hour an and launch the doc during the event itself. we also participcity wide pride planning meetings to insure the event goes smoothly. during the event, our doc is in contact with the city emergency operation center, or eoc, which allows us to be with the police, fire and depadoc and eoc are staffed with public to insure coordination throughout the event and

practice response systems. as the last down market street, our well corio graphed street cleaning team began their work. by the enof difficult to see evidence of thes maive event. the downtown area was sparkling. this year was particularly exciting as the parade ended with what we believe is our largest ever public works float. many thanks to t lgbtq qia committee for spearheading the float and in-pride programming. e our paving score went from 63 d7 ood and san francisco e best among large bay cvexceed the regional score of 67 consider 506 blocks exceeding our goal of 500. on the website there depth about the pavement and a map where the public can access timing ng block by block. i wanted to highlight a little

good news in terms of the budget.ully advocated for some staffing for our street g street inspectors, and we funding for ort so, these positions are critical toour additional hours and allowing our enforcement to perform more evenening and weekend work and taking some of the pressure off our existing team. we will be able to fill five street inspector position, two senior street inspector positions and one street inspector supervisor. this is a great addition our illegal vened ing enforcement effortseen it yet, our al report for fiscal year 22, 23 is out and it and online. the report spotlights the core subs and out of the ordinary work from the response of dedicated and determined front line crews during the historic

winter two new health centers we designed and management and give thaj p thanks for the communication team putting it together so beautifully t. is a beautiful document. we had a successful neighborhood kay day saturdand greening in the marina, pacific heights, cal hollow and presidio heights. thanks to our stafvolunteers. as you noted chair post, we have a game launched on our website called, et. i just wanted to share a little more about it. spby our communication team and i feel like we have one of the more creative communication teams in the city. i think moving beyond traditional government communications. this video game designed to capture the spirit maintaining cleaning and greening san francisco streets and sidewalks, so it is on our and

really units civic pride with style gaming to promote the value caring for neighborhoods while having fun. with that-one other update., you asked for a follow up update to the transit shelter permitting and so i wanted to just give all submitted transit shelter applications have been reviewed by our bureau of street use and am. there are seven inactive or on hold but ose holds were placed by not public works. six permits are so updated plans orresubmittal. there was clarificat requested. there are 10 permits for site planning and schedulefor hearing this wednesday so that essentially means we nin a back-log currently, and there is these ten locations and the previous locations and as of right now, there were three that had put on hold pending outreach .

of the three mta is performing for two locations and one withdrawn, so i wanted to close on that request. with that, i'm happy to take >> thank you very much d thank you for getting back to me on the transit shelter issues given we had members of the public here who had some good information about that. thank you. i have no other questions or comments.colleagues have questionshort on her report? commissioner zoubi. >> good morning. short for the report and i really wanted the work of publduring this huge parade that for that. i want the public to know how pu works and what their position is during the celebration. congratulations on the score, keeping score up. i would like to ask, what is for that score? what are we going for? >> well our to maintain a score of 75 and we it, so now our

goal is to maintain a score of 76, we dont want to drop. that was what we were trying to maintain. >> thank you for that. i would like to make a request--future time to discuss the of supreme court how we handle encampments and thank you. >> great. thank you. >> thank you. secretary fuller, before we open to public comment, if you can please for the next regular meeting attach a etmooing to the 22-23 annual report.never hurts to have another outlet distribute to the public. we will look forward for the briefing on the supreme court commission as commissioner zoubi requitem to public comment. >> members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment in person on item 2, the director's report may line up against the wall furthest from the door.

from the door. if you are commenting from the chamber, press the raise your hand button or star 3 on yourbe recognized. it appears we do have one membspeak on this item. you want to come forwardare you projecting again? minutes to speak and i'll provide with 30 second notice when your time is about to expire. >> thank you advocate for things with small wheels. i like to commend you guys on improvements and street quality. particularly sensitive to improvements.strict and have seen quite a bit of new pavement going down and it is all really great, however, i do want to raise a question. something i brought up before about the type of resurfacing that gat has a particular impact on things with small wheels.ctured is shotwell streets. a slow street.to the super market. if you can tell and perhaps easier to see here, the new pavement is quite a bit rougher then the old

pavement there before.b' there is great new pavement on bryant street going h/south in the mission, however other streets that re residential feature some of the rougher texture.down things with small wheels and much more likely to injure small children who fall or elderly who fall because it is sharpermentf they don't understand the nature of the metric these pavements are judged. if it is just about pothole jz has to do smoothness and newness of the surface, how [indiscernible] always there is a opportunity for san francisco to lead the have more rigorous standards applied more regionally to make things more accessible to people. this is particular concern to me because i think at the end the day we spend a lot of money to do this and i understand how this type of pavement will be a cost saving measure, but it doesn't provide equitable travel through different regions and concerned people in the mission are not receiving notice of the type of pavement

they are and their streets may be less passable for the modes they use.thank you. >> we have no more in-person commenters no callers expressed interest in speaking on this item. >> thank you. please cathe next item, the consent calendar. >> item 3 is general comment. >> i beg your pardon. thank you. >> item 3 is general public comment, which is for topics under the commission mandate specific item on today's agenda. members of the who wish to make three minutes of general public comment in person may line ainst the wall from the door and commenting outside the 3jchamber, press the raise your hand button in the webinar or star 3 on your phone be recognized. mr. [indiscernible] you are in

person commenter. you have three minutes to spak and you'll get a 30 second chime. >> is a image at 15 and mission. this particular building block away from myself placed barricades on the a year. the barricades are there all most every day. i reported them to 311 at least 5 times because they are ada compliant. yesterday i saw they have been put not only between the traffic and sidewalk and also between the sidewalk and building front, so this is aimage yesterday. you can see here the building front has been blocked and access from sidewalk has been blocked. here is a woman who is at

least 70 years old getting out of she had to walk an tional 50 feet to get around the barricades. they go around the bike locks provided for the people who live in the building. this is ago, similar problem. again, a year ago on a differen stroller blocked from the sidewalk. i are return to the video clear the department of public works is lend city infrastructure to private citizens or for the protection of private property in a way compromise people. people use canes or rely vending in using canes or strollers and i like to offer be a significant difference organization and actual actions of the organization. i infrastructure de available to building owners to block the right of way.

i don't believe it is legal and ada compliant so i have a ton of questions about this and raise the efficacy of 311 because it doesn't seem to matter how many times i report this, e not held ac people seem to pay fines if they receive any and persist pu this infrastructure in the street. it isn't equitable or just and don't understand why happening and love someone to look into that. thank you. >> have a couple follow-up questions for the speaker, please, if you can return to the podium.you said you filed reports with 311 about >> numerous times overthe last year. >> thank you. have you attempted to public works staff directly, called anybody? >> i followed with 311 if that has put me with publici'm not sure, but i had people say-one people i ey showed up and saw nothing. they looked at the wrong intersection, despite the fact i tagged it in the 311 repyou very much. >> yep.

>> issioner turner. >> director short, i have been on a little vacation, buthing i came back to was the summer is getter warmer, kids are out, skateboarding down hills.many different things to help protect the right of way, protect the public. some of these pictures seemingly are in some of those places where we in collaborative way with the city are trying to mitigate multiple hazards happening at one time. can speak quickly to-we l see this occurrence coming more e and more. how do we judge and more importantly balance really enforcement with again, right of way access, but also what people have commandeered as a place of entertainment that is about the right of way? >> thank you cosioner turner. carla short, director. yeah, it is a tricky balancing act and i do just want to note that we

do respond 311 requests and there are inspectors i think we in other places as well. we may go out and we engage with the responsible party and they y to the previous condition after we have left. wesee with the illegal vending when we try to e qm around that. also, many of the requests for barricades are at the request department, don't generally provide barricades-we don't provide barricades . let me not say generally but be intersection an 15 and mission c, ekends with a of people gad illegal vending and so i'm with those barricades and th were provided for certainly i am will follow up about the access but the sidewalk did meet ada from what i could see in the photos, so we are always looking -to insure there is ada access for the public right of you note, a huge

crowd of people also is a blockage and so we try to manage those two different things. than the phone. >> thank you, please call the next item. the consent calendar including the draft minutes from june 24, 2024 meeting )of the public works commission, and also includes four nine contract modifications, but now excludes item 4b, which was postponed the next-until the september 9 meeting and 4n, which will be heard following item 6. note corrections for clarity e in the draft minutes and these in the documents posted on the ieco consent calendar items can be heard £ individually upon request by a commissioner, staff or the public and adoption of the consent calendar and all resolutions contained in it is an

action item. before motion is made, i'm happy to take corrections to the minutes or any questions. >> thank you.couple of questions before we entertain a motion to the consent calendar. director short, this regards item h, the new fire training modification. i want to know why the additive alternate cost full mep design was not included as part of the initial contract scope of work. it seems that have avoided the requirement >> carla short, director. i don't know if project manager ryer might be able to answer that question. i'm not sure why we were not able to include that previously. could you repeat your question? l

it was regarding fire training facility mep desig why the capital additive capital alternate cost to provide the full mep designs was not included as part of the initial contract scope of work. e modifying to allow it today. if it was there to begit need to modify it today. that is i was asking. >> i will have to get back to yo apology we don't have that answer. >> thank you. i will not-- >> okay. it seems that our tor project management may be available. >> great. thank you. >> [unable to hear speaker] >> i

think it is good enough. i'm not hold up for it. maybe more info at the sep meeting. >> we can do a follow-up. >> i'm not sure it answered my question, but it sounds like-that's okay. it could be a funding thing. more funds were available or something. okay. >> it sound me like the-we did include this alternate proposal

at the same time, but we wereoing with design build model and then realized it was more prudent to go with this additive alternate proposal, so that is why-it was initially d, but we didn't go down that path initially, but i'll get more it was more prudent to switch. >> if i just add, taylor, deputy city attorney procurements, it is quite common that out initial solicitation, you put a base scope of work that you ask all proposers to bid or propose there might be other scopes that at the procurement you may be contemplating, but might not have enough funding at the time to full amount. there might be you are contemplating putting in the project in the future so you add them in what is called, additive alternat sometimes they mi

say a certain type of tile and in the base shave the basic run of the mill tile. your alternate might be something fancier and more expensive and quite úting might.ternate can be additional scope or sloitly different scope in to allow proposers to give information, sometimes pricing on those alternates so that once the project 7? awarded and you start the project maybe more funding comes in and you can use a al something you might add later, by inclutime of procurement you get a public pricing and public proposal on if it is design it might the approach for that thing might be. it sounds like sometimes they mentioned mep, that is and plumbing scope. that is doneof the design is done later. it sound here they might have that scope of work

into design builbut full design where you produce full architectural documents. nk you very much. that was a helpful clarification.you very much. i also for open to my colleagues on i-m and o. these were some of the workforce development grant extensions. my estion really is just one, is if the two pit stop the trashcon steaming contract and street cleaning contract be in effect through july 31, 2025 so we don't have to amend them next year for june, the month of june? hello deputy director robertson. sp

[no audio]

>> thank you very much. it sound it is a budget problem we have a fiscal year that starts july 1 but don't get a budget until mid-august and thtopic for another day why that is a problem. commissioner t >> i want to-more of a general mm coaround those samitems and think we had a lot of discussion and also want to commend staff a lot of progress and i want to make sure as we continue to really push forward workforce development training and programming, i see mr. hill in the ba he has done a tremendous job, particularly with deputy director durden to make sure we are clear of our goals with workforce and how those investments are important. who are stewards of the funds. i want to and the city fiduciary be good stewards, so this is a budgetary kind of quag myer we have the éz

best team every year, so i thank you. but i do want to be mindful gnificant increases and changes for these non profits that they also need to be accountable for and that is what i'll lo or. i'm proud of the wo but being dependent upon others we need to make sure that are very clear about our expectations, outcomes and and i'm grateful, partic since it has been about 9 we really engaged and started working, i have seen nothing but improvement and think the efficiency with the small amount of money that goes to small non profits. >> agree wholeheartedly. my other comments, as we ask-as the commission asked for we look forward at the end of the 18 month contract period for a full report next june on these six contracts from the department point of view and grantees point of we invited them to come back so look forward to the end full report how

everybody thinks they are going or changed or not changed. >> thank you for that.and commissioner director durden team and my team and have cadence and looking at the a and approved the analysis. i know friends of the urban forest is here. th [indiscernible] cyc and hunter point family, so i look forward producing that report and think it will be thorough and robust. >> thank you very much. commissioner zoubi. one question. those increases, they in the budget presente >> these increases are included in the 10 percent plus the 5 percent cuts that we presented? >> correct. that was a bit of the delay. as we are working with the mayor's office to her budget june 1, and then work wg the board of supervisors as their review a hold up is not 22 what the final number would be.that were

submitted and approved and accepted by the board of supervisors are included in these amounts and we have suffic budget to fully fund the items before you today. >> are we going to have a update final final? >> yes. budget staff are working on that report. last year we issued shortly after the mayor sig we should be on a similar timeline this go-round as welt. i have seen preliminary draft. we are working on it and numbers change. >> thank you. >> thank you. commissioner turner reminded me racucners are here today. since they took the time and trouble to come to the meeting, did anyone want to come to the podium and say you dont have to, but i like to acknowledge when people make the effort. post and commissioners, brian friends of the urban forest. my only comment is that, we are looking forward to continuing to public works to meet the goals of our grant which include not only workforce development, training green collar jobs getting placed in

permanent full ti planting thousands of trees across our ciwant also commend public works staff. the last time i was up here we talked about delays in invoicing and are payment and i want have seen improvement in that from our end vhover the last and hope to that positive relationship, particularly with thank you. thnk you for ur support. come to the that to be sure.all for coming.changention one item will be postpoto september and another heard there a second?aichck. secretary the motion to public comment. >> members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment in motion to approve item 4, the consent calendar and all solutions contained in it, excluding 4b and 4n may line up against the wall furthest from the door.g outside the chamber, press raise your hand button in 3 on your phone to be

okay mr.--we need you to use the wireless microphone that is right in the middle there. sorris confusing with so many microphones and you have three minutes to speak and you get 30 second warning. >> thanks just want to make sure i understand. the is being discussed at a separate meeting? >> postponed to our next regular meeting september 9, exactly. >> got you. okay. not appropriate then to make on the details of it? given the documents are made available on the-- >> [indiscernible] >> it is up sto you if you like to make them in september. >> there is enough members of the organization here i think it makes sense to say something. [indiscernible] helpful support in this. i want to note that the of the program ed to update street sidewalks to be that. my understanding, there is a sole

bidder for this. i should say, disappointed there isn't more outreach to find the event there is a sole bidder.discussion of curb ramp street resurfacing. street resealing. grinding and ng and there is a bit in there about making sure that sidewar$good and curb ramps and everything else are to speck. the reason i bring this is because, i mentioned before and thank you th me with city engineers. the current design of the not meet ada standard and so despite the factme drive ways for cars and not anything else and heard here the design of the lip is for drainage and anything else, the fact remains they are not ada t and do the standard set forth. i'm concerned that we are be throwing millions dollars after a single bid and looking at the documents the scope does not include adjusting driveways to be ada compliant. it seems a gross oversight to me.

mentioned again and again, riding down the street with things of small wheels one has to nstantly vigilant of the quality of the driveway lip, because not only are they regular impassable with the current design and beyond the scope of wdphat is acceptable and so it makes it very riding thin allowed to do and dangerous to transition to the lowed to do because the current definition set fort by thcity do notcover our use of the street, despite beingally recognized vehicle class in san francisco. i understand this is moved to later date, but i scope of the project revised to include the grinding down lips to be beveled as specified by the ada in section 303.1, such that we can actually see those areas made accessible. >> your time is up. thank you. do not have other in person commenters and there their hand to speak over the phone as well, so that concludes public

comment. >> thank you.more questions, all in favor of approving the or yes. passes unanimously. it is adopted and the resolutions will be posted to commission's website. secretary fuller, please call the next item. >> turning to the is the joint development technical advisory services for sfmta potrero yard project. bureau of prt management manager and the earthquake safety and emeresponse manager is here to present the contract modification. if we can continue using that wireless remote. it will help you a lot better. >> thank you. chair post, commissionerto introduce one [indiscernible] my colleague from mta will walk through the presentation about the project in request chair post. she was curious about the

project. it is a high and since this is managed by san thought it was more appropriate for the drether of the to the project. my part here is approval of modification number five. [unable to hear speaker] this is--under contract with public works and we provide consulting service management consulting service to sfmta, and this is request for approval of $578 thousand to existing contract, which would make the entire co4 million, 'll extend the

services, which include financ commercial and technical advisory service through 2026, which is 30, 2026. this is-qul think that introduction of and request your approval. with that, i am turning it to over to [indiscernible] >> good morning commission. my name is chris, project director for potrero yard. just to pgive back ground, this is the first public privaof a larger lti-billion dollar program that we are referring to as the building progress program, and this is the first of what we hope are m several projects to modernize

our faciour transit access to san franciscans as well as allowing us to meet our mandate to electify our fleet by 2040. talk about what that means. this improves efficiency. i guess i should ba u potrero is a 109 year old bus facility. itelectric trolley coach facility. built over a hundred years ago and was originally it is highly inefficient because we are different age required for the vehicles. this project envisions not ony to consolidate all our electric trolley bus fleet into this one facility, but also improve operations and maintenance staff and then set these types of improvements at

presidio yard and other yards in the future. sustainability is also a key component, as i mentioned. achieving fully electric fleet by 2040 is our mandate, and so this helps us kind of start moving the achieving that.eé additionally, by improving this facility, replacing it with a new state of the art are able to increase the number of buses that operate out this fuisility by roughly this says 54 but we are looking to increase that further and looking at joint development as a serving the xfcommunity beyond just improving transit operations. here you can see a rendering of the potrero yard and you notice there is not just a bus facility here, but we are also looking to inup to 465 units of affordable and work

in fact, a portion of the workforce is slated for construction atolooking to also have some preference for mta staff, including those operations and maintenance stafthat work at potrero yard, again increases efficiency, instead of many staff having to commute from long distances at hours where bart partner transit agencies are nosee foreground is along ryant street, there is the first phase of affordablehousing is there. roughly a hundred units give or take affordable housing planned family housing at that site that would take up the point 4 acres. we are on the edge of districts 9 and 10. there are currently 6 transit routes that operate out of potrero

yard and i believe i covered this already, but again, this is about 109 facility. it is also not-has seismically retrofited, so this is also a way to insure that the also safe, both for our staff well as the community. showing on the slide, briefly again about 246 electric trolley buses are slated for storage and operation at the that means we'll have roughly i believe over 800 staff that will be working on different shifts in the building, so .u

improving efficiency of the building this our equity goals improving transit to those that need it the most in the community. this serves communities throughout the city, including the adjacent trero hill neighborhood. and then as i mentioned, housing will actually be not just the bryantstreet phase, but there will be two additional phases on top of the bus including both affordable and workforce housing. we are looking at 465 total units with bedroom count of 776. there have been the unit count throughout the process of going through review, and part of the reason for that is, initially the street housing was seen as a senior housing development, which would have included more units but with the decision to transition that to a family housing

building the number of units did have to reduce tobut the overall bedroom count co. a couple other things that are worth pointing out. one of the amenities planned for the new potrero yard facility is much requested public restrooms for the adjacent franklin square park as as several commercial spaces for and then in addition, se improve ment to the pe this block. in &tterms of the scale of our , part of why we started this project with outreach and in 2018, throughout >[+the process, public engagement and public in in fact, we have a neighborhood working group speed on everything going on with the project and

d are also present in those meetings so we 150 inrtun in the project and provide their feedback. again, we started the k process back in 2017 and 2018. we first did an rfq for our actual public private partner s in the project and then we ultimately did bring on potrero neighborhood collective which is spearheaded by [indiscernible] their is based in la, but part of the development team includes s partners, including those eve enin the are both in terms of housing as well as public outreach. our entitlements and environmental review were approved by the board of supervisors and mta bord earlier this yoor, so we are preparing to release rfp for design build

contractor who will ultimately actubus yard and so we anticipate currently being on schedule to bring that again to the board for approval of the project november, fallowed by approval of the design build contractor early 2025 and within 90 days we expect the developer to mobilize to begin commissioning the site, demolishing the existing structure and beginning anticipate roughly a four beginning to end where potrero yard would be back online early 2029. d i apparently didn't catch up with the slides there. where -with that time and i'm available along with magtions.

>> thank you i-very much mr. lazaro. good to see you again. i do have questions. which should i do? i will start at the covid pandemic changed transit ridership in the city. the pandemic no one could have predicted. how is post covid ridership and how has that changed planning and design fwr the project if it has? >> thank you for my understanding from our dire tumlin, transit ridership especially on d nicely. i don't know we fully .e-pandemic ridership accept a few key rounts. one example we exsided is south van nene. i think part of our strategy for improving ridershi achieving that pre-covid ridership and exceeding it making these kinds of improvements

so we by improving vehicles on the streets for needed maintenance and repairs, this will definitely support that. again, i think we have been on the trajectory of continuing to see ridership increase, especially including these bus routes that operate out of potrero. >> great. thank you. that is good news. this project takes 12 years to deliver, which we always want to commend the city on public outreach, what you described is what is excessive amount of meeting. this is a neighborhood activist who appreciates and think it is very public participate in city government and give feedback, soi don't know if that is what they are demand, but sounds excessive public engagement and could be effecting the timing of this project.

i also wondered if back in the day your commission, your board ever considered bringing-delivering the project reverse, where a housing expert runs the show. of housing delivery departments runs this as a housing project where sfmta has (épartnership between an entity that knows how to build i deliver housing and your expertise how-what is needed in a . that train i'm sure left the station many years ago. 12 years i have been hearing about this project a long time an been discussed a long time and will go on another 5 years. again, was this discussed being primarily a housing project rather then transit project? >> great questions. couple clarifications. the developer team was brought on november 2022, so that really cked off the design process.

much of preceded that is again, related to actually determining e bus yard itself, what is the in terms of what kind of building would they be willing to accept in terms of height d how many units is considered acceptable to community, and so, couple things--so, the pre-development begin in late 2022, we are thick that and so from 2022 through 2029 for the size and scope of this project on track actually to stick with the schedulewe have originally set out for back in 2017 the facility framework was first developed. as neighborhood working group, i think one thing that the presentation, there are many pieces of the project beyond the bus yard and the housing. there is also public art, there is kind of tied into this project that we want to insure the public is in the driver with us every step of the way, and then

as far as the question around which direction to start the project from.always been envisioned as a bus yard supporting development beis really the key not to improving mta operation across the board, but it does again start a domino future projects that we intend to deliver anthis is on a current property that the mta operate and so, the housing was seen as something that the community wanted and are supportive that and i very much look forwa well, but it very much has to be bus yard first fallowed by the housing. >> i'm not questioning the ne bus yard. >> sure. >> speaking of housing, you addressed the conversion from senior to families, but given the dire situation of housing in san francisco, particularly the past couple yea ramped up and can't seem to build too much housing, is the ing in the

465 units? it seems to me we need more and this might be a place to put something since the project hasn't been t is 465 housing units and based on the outreach, as well as the work that the developer team over the past couple years to figure what ncially, the 465 is really pretty much at the cap of can be accommodated here. that being said, again, we have future sites that also we are looking at development opportunities there to incorporate housing future sites, but that is what can be accommodated there today. made and late to the party and fully aware that, of the city. i'm still unclear, but think you 5 year tuesday public engagement, maybe covid, all of i would like to ask, on this project

gone or ne@ñg tavly, what is learned along the way and what are you pleased about and particularly dismayed about and have any of those effected the project? >> i'll just mention, i think again the involved the community throughout this process rough in the fact that when we went to both the mta board supervisors earlier this year with entitlements and that that was done unanimously without any opposition. there was no appeal to the ental review and we believe that was due to the fact that kept the community and the public at e way. we continue to post all the updates on our website. we out every a new drafted and try to stay in front of the ation through every step and we believe that is paying off in terms of the support we are seeing for the anything that hasn't gone

well we are benefit from? we are looking for lessens learned that could be applied to city projeblths. >> i think i have to get back to you. are fairly close to the schedule we set out for i think is a good sign. >> great. thank you very much. this is a very high profile project. a very needed pr really good project. i'm excited to see it completed speaking with us. commissioner turner. >> i like toup where commissioner post left, which is, i'm amazed. i have been on vacation in the middle of was so eager toget back because of all the amazing things we do and this is one of the projects. i'm not suother yards outside hudson yard in new york where people how do we take advantage of communities, transform the communities through pr unlike new york, we are delivering as affordable and workforce

housing reflective of the community and need. not end resort. i'm proud to see how the took advantage of valuable land hout how to take advant age of density. i have a couple things. as we get moving through this.a really important point chair post is making which is, scale replication and also the uniqueness of some of the jects coming to us and we are happy to play a le and want to make sure our role is really clear, and that often happens is people lose sight 06 who is who.outreach and tryi make sure folks know important and encourage our team to make sure it is clear what this means and the role we because again, as we challenged with many multiple projects, i think about the civil grand jury report and how projects are so unique ing sometimes one off and are

delivered every last one of with you and will be good stewards and very accountable and have to point out challenges as chair out and also where we can scale and replicate. i got my eye on police stations, a fire station and others i love to see housing, particularly workforce housing to bring police officers and fire emergency officers all back to the city the place they serve so i thank you and look forward learning more and how to make sure this is a scapeable and replicable project for public works. >> thank you. >> commissioner z>> thank you for the presentation. pretty big project and it hits two birds with one stone. my question is, is there a place where i can go maybe online or just to the community input, rather then just outreach? i can see there is outreach. cneighborhood, have these but e-anat the community?

like what are they afraid of if don't li like, is there a place can y can these comments? yo we cated site for the continue to post everything, historically from all of our meeting minutes from all ne as all the documents again lated ceqa and entitlements are all there. dition, we ctively go out to events in fact, we will be doing more always making sure that we give people in the public an things they have questions about or concerns about, that we address those either there inon the website in some way. >> for example, every neighborhood--majority of the neighborhoods they have associations. are there letters from these associations approving or approving or giving input the meeting?

>> many letters were submitted in support of entitlements and environmental review, but also we applied for grant funding earlier this spring and received letters of support members of franklin square being one example among others, so yes, absolutely. >> thank you. last question is, there were four modifications in the past five years. should anticipate one co next year? how do you the project and do you think there will be a need fofication for this? >> this should be the contract, because we will be moving into the project agreement will be a separate agreement with for advisory services tied to that agreement so this will be the last for that. >> thank you. >> you said sfmta is the manager of this project? ::

>> we have a-this we have a-the potrero neighborhood collective will be more or less overseeing design build contractor, but that will be in partnership with sfmta, yes. neighborhood collective. what is that? >> that the grouping of all of the so [indiscernible] lead developer and so they actually be issuing the design build contractor rfp with that ctor directly for delivery of the that will be our will be involved ever step of the way. >> sorry, not familiar with plannery maerb. maerb. america. >> they are large company. a local office in la who is the team on the project. >> thank you very much. director short, what will public work role be? >> we will also have nsibility as

well so in partnership with the mta to deliver the project and we helped lead the pre-development phase. f >> great. i don't think i knew that, so thank you very much. that's great news. if there are no rther questions or comments on this--i'll second to --no tg it is contract modification, so i'll second that motion. we do have a motion to modify the contract. thank you very much mr. lazaro and open public comment. >> members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment in person on the motion to approve item development technical advisory services potrero yard modernization, may line up against the wall furthest from the door. if you are commenting outside your hand button in the webinar or st on your phone to

you will have three minutes please middle wireless microphone that might be easier for you a 30 notice with your time is about to expire. >> great. look frgward to this. thank you for your questions. really lovely. commissioner turner mentioned new york city where public works and municipal trone agency. something i continue to come back to here is the so much extra work being done, so dollars spent and siloed conversation because you two different commissioners and two if you consider the split here and wfso much ends up getting replicateed and opportunities are missed as a result of the split. showing on the screen, if a group of me an friends in thards. you can 4 bikes on a bus but you can fit as many skateboards as you can people. something not clear in the s and space ararea and whether or no

opportunities for invasion there. i appreciate all the questions around housing. i think that is really great. een the bus and sidewalk and everything else are addressed in the documents on i took a look at it. just want to note there are s to engage as far as curb design goes especially considering accessible of low income people and people in and if we kcontinue with [indiscernible] continue to limit access given how long timeline, given insistence on climate mitigation, gichben the interaction with [indiscernible] a feature focused organization and interested reducing carbon intensity. as ze a way to encourage multi-modal a ses and reduce carbon emission and give nger and older people access to transit. seattle is working on this. working on beveled edges with to loading zones in and out of th i argue softer bevel is more important. noted in the design, we dont significant space beyond any sort of tree basin such it could be

used as a passing lane outside the main thoroughfare of the sidewalk. again, this area here could be widened this to be more accessible. just noting here, what is in the design right now, linear protected bike lanes. love to see that adjusted, love to more accessibility brought into the conversation. with regard to the mta public outreach, i ocontinue to show up to conversations i see distinct difference between the mta stated intent outreach and actual ability to be up in the middle of their day to make >> thank you for your comments. we do o9not have any further in person commenter jz do not callers who expressed inest interest in this item so that concludes public comment. >> thank you.questions on the motion, all in favor of the contract modification for the potrero yard modernization project say aye or yes.

the motion carries and the contract modification resolution will be posted to the commission website. it is now 1027. we will have to take w4a break at 1040 to 11 o'clocmaybe earlier. i anticipate the zuckerberg item taking more then 10 or 15 minutes, yet i don't want to delay. with apology to mr. chen and his colleagues, let's get started on item 6 now please and sorry haved along the way, but i like to keep moving. >> item 6 is san francisco building 5 seismic up grade and renovation and project r joe chen will present this contract modification. it is an action item.

>> testing. post, vice chair zoubi, commissioner turner. my name is works program managerbond program by [indiscernible] department of public health. we have [indiscernible] jackson, interim deputy chief operation officer, capital project oversight advisor and jason capital planning director. here toprint on the zuckerberg san francisco general building seismic up grade and renovation contract.

sorry. public works is requesting commission consideration and approval to approve increase to the contract cost and duration contingency and authorize pu works to approve future modification for this contract. the revised contract is at 94 million, 662 thousand, dollars and 9 cents which includes all approved public works is requesting commission approval construction cost contingency by 25 million 923 thousand 76 dollars.duration by 572 days. public works requesting approval to the contract allow the completion of the bidding and buy out and execution of change to complete the projects. all project included is in building 5 on the campus at 1001 potrero avenue district 10.

the project clients for this projethis th. funding for the project is provided by 2016 public health and safety bond program. dph levereraged funding from the 2020 health recovery bond program general funds as well as sfgh foundation gift donation funds. the architect of record is bureau architecture with public works and rnible] in lbe architectural firm. public works targeting to achieve final completion for all projects by second quarter 2026. all projects included are part of 16 building 5 component. the scope of work is part of dph long-term plan to convert building 5 into new outpatient care center, consolidated specialty clinics on or off campus to building 5 unlike more typical contracts, the contract is asked to deliver 6 perm

[indiscernible] one of the typical project deli meá(od. allows public works to select a general contractor not based on lowest price but finding right partner most qualified based on project he position to be most successful. the six projects are grade, relocation, public health laboratory, it infrastructuce and clinical laboratory. selected because of the complexity of hospital construction. the need to have ntractor on bord prior to on start complicated phasing logistics and inspection control plans performed reviews and investigation as well as develop construction schedule. the seismic upgrade includes column enlargement and work scope coordinated and completed ongoing construction activities for lab, pes and

by utilizing the method, we are working with one general contractor able to plan construction activities for all projects which avoids the blame game when you are working with multiple general contractors that need share a common project site. all the tasks are performed by the cmgc as part of pre-construction prior to construction star the next two a status update of all six projects. i wont each project, but let me few keylights. you get a sense of different level. lab is jcompletion by third quarter 2024. infrastructure and pes, complete at 52 percent based on location completed. more then seismic, remaining locations are the most challenging, because the team e two foot [indiscernible] pes main renovation is works issued construction on map-13, 2024. summary

of the íh construction cost and contract prove change orders to date as remaining cost contingency based on change orders. the contract amount is 86 million, 410 thousand, 253 dollars. approved change orders total 8 million, 252 thousand, 705 dollars and 9 cents which leaves 388 thousand and 91 cents remaining cost contingency reserves.remaining reserves are not adequate to complete the project.construction duration is 1429 calendar days to final completion date of october 7, 2024. not approved time extension to date, does not expect to complete the last project until second quarter 2026. public works is requesting approval to increase the duration calendar days which result in duration of 2144 calendar days

and allchange orders to extend through september 31, 202 public works request approval to increase cost 25 million, 923 thousand, 76 dollars which ized contract cost limit of 120 974 thousand, the neslide provides a summary- >> sorry, i colleague has a hard stop at 11. i wanted to know anything to say to the commission before we take our break? >> sure. to come up? >> sorry to cut you off. madam chair, commissioners, mack primo, a oversight advisor for director of health commissi i want to give insight how we decisions within public health. so, retreat we go on frequently with dph

leadership and about 50 to 60 capital managers from both campuses as well as ambulatory care. call, safe building program that :/gically aligns us with the city cpc capital plan, and so we çado a really granular 10 year capital plan specifically on buildings, upcoming bond issues, what's in the bond ish sueess, the capacity has and how we fit intothe other on the 2016 bond that joe was referring to, just a little background on that. that in 2015 and the ask at the time was bond was 350 but shared by three departments so the zuckerberg piece got 222 million even though the estimate was 330. thwe are catching up

and thank god we have the san francisco foundation who is embarking on $220 capital campaign, specifically for building 5 and support building 5. also, we have jason is here the executive project manager and can talk about a huge grant we got from the state. we are piecing toall these things and we do meet to make decisions building 5. we did an analysis. madam chair, i can't remember when.4 we used outside renovating the building we needed to do versus tearing it down and rebuilding. the 330 to renovate or $1.3 billion to do a new one.sue. the others if we took it down we would have about a 3 month ceqa process and so by keeping it there structural upgrade, we are able to get a categorical exemption, so that is paperwork and we are able to d up the schedule.

the other operational issues that are critical to keep four things same time. that is psych emergency service, the the new building but not in the new building food, the pharmacy and then-joe, what is the other function? the clinical lab.otr even though they are two structures. the new building we built and finished in 2015 and we are renovatingism there is them and if you haven't been out there it is insightful to go through and see the flow of the physicians and nurses and lab work and radiology and everything else that has to take place between those two buildings, so the decision was to keep it, because we don't have real estate available at this point on the 24 acre campus, cially after the ucsf transactional research at parking lot. we have very little space to do anything, so if we were to take

it down, build new, we have to do temporary pharmacy, temporary kitche just go away when the building was built so we are throwing the money away so we made a decision to keep it. we were locked fronts so that is a example how we look at each decision. we currently have been working with the mayor office and bru bond that is being proposed by the mayor and for november, so with the same strategic alignment put into each of these things. if there-i know you have a hard stop. you have a hard stop. >> thank you. that was very helpful and thank you for asking the question didn't tear it down. any questions for mr. primo before we take our break? thank you so much. very useful and helpful. thank you. we will now break plan for 11. let's plan for 11 o'clock. thank you.

[recess until [meeting reconvened] >> we are back in session. thank you for the wait and thank you mr. chen for your patience and please continue with your presentation. >> thank you. thyou commissioners. as i mentioned earlier, the next slide is a graphical summary of contract duration coningeancy

calculation. the approved contingency of 143 and [indiscernible] in this contract, it was planned to have 6 projects stagger because . [indiscernible] received plan approval construction contract awaand start [indiscernible] the bottom 6 s show the duration in yellow and blue bar the time extension ed to complete the project. there are two yellow bars because the project separated separately permitted projects.started november 2021 and include material abatement [indiscernible] the second is main renovation and ao build the project team decided to utilize the strategy result of lessens learned from past projects.complete the demolition scope

first. unforeseen conditions and [indiscernible] we have seen in other projects.after the compic demolition, proceeding with early scopes to complete floor floating scanning and new wall layout. scanning early, the team was able to identify conflects with existing rebar prior to construction start and start developing drawing revisions needed to avoid the conflicts. le impact where over 60 percent of the new walls in ions. the main renovation project was lso always planned to start construction much later then the other project because was still in and review. the project did not receive ly 2023. the early demolition project completed october 2023. [indiscernible] also delayed because the rehab department relocation project which waoutside the scope of work for this contract. this project managed public

works and awarded to bill group as the general contractor. the bbrehab project were driven by combination of conditions, existing conditions that were identified as non code compliant and [indiscernible] damaged by a contractor. correction of these issued impacted project completion. public works is requesting for increase to the cost and duration contingency because of cost and time reconciliation, higher bid prices and [indiscernible] cost and contract structure is based on cost estimate provided by public works during the request for proposal phase. once the cmgc is unboarded and tas completed and trade packages bid out to the trade contractors, the actual cost of the project are finalized. there is inherent process to true up and reconcile the differences between the cost estimate and bid prices.

the higher bid prices public work the projects necessitated the need for dph to mault decisions regarding the project that were part of the contract. [indiscernible] removed from the cmcg contract and delivered by a contractor selected in the future. funding limitations, the health center is phased to . the project is in the bidding to award the bid build contract the third quarter of 2024. [indiscernible] also placed on hold during design until new source can be identified. public works is working with dph to complete design of the project and targeting to proceed to construction by 2026 2027. another was reduction of the scope for the it infrastructure.is infrastructure including the build ouf out new electrical low voltage infrastructure for the buil and [indiscernible] for existing and new teledata rooms.

the scope for the project was determined to be higher priority as needed to support functionality of existing and new teledata rooms.tifying strategy to implement the electrical and low voltage scopes in the phased manner and possibly incorporate into future of the 25 million increase to cost contingency, approximately $9 million is needed the ng for pts and it infrastructure.16 million is needed for public received and not approved of ringe to project completion. the 572 to duration contingency is needed to allow upgrade and pes targeted to achieve final completion second quarter of 2026. project team is always trying to better calibrate our cost estimate to be able to more accurately forecast construction budgets for the brilding projects. working with operational conditions, [indiscernible] issues

make it challenges. ese are factors contractors increase for perceived to protect themselves. the project team is trying bto minimize--for example, working existing buildings one of is whether design is constructable iling. designers typically use as built drawing to map possible routes for piping and duct work in the overhead not always acaret not all changes does show the space diwith cmcg partner to the extent possible to better map ounditions as laser scanning tol tuesday share with trade contractor which reduce the factor cost that trade contractors include in the bid price to account for uncertainties. anotheras a separately permitted project as a way to minimize [indiscernible] tends to help reduce bid pricing. there is limiters willing to work in hospital construction, we ha [indiscernible] to outreach to trade contractors to

talk to them and garner inton our projects. more trade contractors willing to submit bids more competitive prices. depending on the scope of work, public work wg cmgc to better control cost and manage these perceive risks public works and dph understand more operational constraints will increase the bid pricing, so to extent possible, public works is working with dph to identify opportunit to complete enabling projects that relocate staff prior to construction start to minimize increase cost associated with phasing labor productivity. at this point, i know mr. responded to the question regarding whether rebuild buildi5 versus replacement. i went go into more detail and happy to questions you have regarding that topic. the last slide is just reminder

of why public works is here today. public work requesting consideration and appral to approve increase to contract contingency approve future modifications and that concludes my presentation for today and available to answer questions you may have. thank you. >> thank you very much for yoyou all three of us for last week's tour of the construction site and all the multiple projects you he difficulty of performing this construction work safely and efficiently in a setting and extensive site mitigation requires was eye opening to put it mildly. but the surgical precision public works and contractors have to work to keep the hospital safe and clean was again, a pleasant shock, but a shock. i also want to thank you and complement you on the excellent memo that you prepared describing complex

construction project, the staff memo in our materials to prepare for the meeting. it was excellent. and again, thank you forer answering the questions i sent ahead of time. you alluded to a number of processes that have been learning along the way that can be car want to put a fine point on it because i know i have known you before and you managed non-hospital projects as well. what lessens learned are there some that you just want to point out that you have been learning through the zuckerberg project that could be applied to other public works projects overall for any city client? >> thank you for the question chair post. that's a excellent question. i say, have the magic bullet and all issues will be think when it comes to

projects in general it comes with uncertainty and concern and i think a lot of time designers and th?7 team tends design and going immediately to construction. i think what we learned just sometimes in the long run to take the effort to the field investigation. extent possible. the reason i say lot of spaces in the hospital are occupied so it go and open ceiling, cut openings and do investigation while the space is still being operationally in use by staff and patients. it is delicate plans the client department and research and we do our best to look at field. i think it does make in the long run to spend effort to do additional field investigation where we can so you can avoid these surprises is typically what delays project. >> thank you.

it reminds me of the 911 project, we couldn't move everybody out there. they emergency calls. there are a lot of senior staff in nice to hear what can be project. i want to thank you. this is a 27 percent increase to project cost and contingency from the original contract award, which is considerable but you have given description why the projected cost turned out to be such odds with the original estimate, so i thank you for that. i thank you. commissioner turner. >> director short, i believe there is ongoing plan for $300 million bond issuance, would that impact this project and if imagine it expands the scope of project meaning more then likely come back assuming bond issuance is successful? >> um, i think-yes, there is still a plan to issue the bond.

as i understand it, i think the details of how some of theresources would be spent is still being finalized, so i'm not sure--as mark primo mentioned, there is a capital campaign underway by the friends of-don't know if that is the right term. zuckerberg. i don't know the answer at this time. i don't know if joe knows whether that bond infusing resources into this project. i know-okay, project manager there are different buildings that that bond would support. >> commissioner zoubi. >> i do want to piggy back and thank you for the great tour of the hospital building 5, and just showed me example of changing engines

mid-flight, but i everything was organized and again, i the partnership with public health and how working together with them. break-down ñ@of $25 million and the other night i what did i ask just ask? so thank you for that. i just want to ask the question as commissioner turner. we already started those six projects, hit the ground, start working. should we expect another either extension or increase in the next 6 to 12 m >> commission zoubi, thank you for the question. we know today, we don't anticipate coming back to commission for additional approval. this approval if approved commission does include contingency for future change orders built based what

we know baseon the current projects. we have a few all most complete so minimum riskism clean lab in a couple months so we already have a smaller t into it. the one project that just startsing which is pes psychiatric emergency service, so we carried a larger contingency, so our plan based on what we know all the cards on the table, this contingency should be sufficient to allow us to sh the thongect. prongect. project. >> thank you very mitch. a motion-did anyone want the podium and add a word to what mr. chen said today, since you have taken the time and trouble to come to the meeting. you dont have to. you can handle it? okay. great. i move that we approve this modification. great.

thank you there is a motion to approve and second. please open the motion to public comment. >> make three minutes of comment in person on the motion to approve item 6, the zuckerberg san francisco general ital building 5 seismic gr upradification may line up against the wall. if commenting outside the chamber, press the raise your hand button in the webinar or star 3 to be recognized. it does not appear we have commenters iperson on this item, and sfgovtv is indicating we do not have callers either so that conclude >> thank you. if no other question the motion please say aye or yes. aye. the motion carries and the contract modification resolution will be posted to very much again mr. chen. we will now take the item from

the consent calendar postponed for another zuckerberg hospital item, 4h. >> the next item is zuckerberg different general hospital building 5 rehab department relocation phase 3 contract modification and this item was originally on the consent calendar, but pulled to be heard individually. project manager lindsey who is here toprint print present the report. 4n. >> good morning everyone.ñ) good morning chair post. vice chair commissioner turner, director short and city attorney. my name is lindsey who, project manager with san francisco public w today i'm here to present the zsfg building 5 rehab department relocation and the phase 3 construction

contract modification. thank you for touring with us. i had the pleasure meeting a few of you project we toured so i'll give backgrouare seeking approval to increase the the duration contingency for the rehab project. the original approved contract amount is 4 million, 103 thousand, 914 dollars and 54 cents. today we are seeking approval thousand, 624 and 395 consecutive calendar days. the construction and the reason this will allow us fl execution of future change orders including time extensions to co the project. as the department of public health. the funded by the 2016 public health and safety bond. we are also receiving additional funding resources from grant and gift doimation. donation. the architect of record is

bureau of architecture:constructor is kl to substantial completion. the projected completion date was april 25, 2024. this fallowed a more nal design bid . the scope is in the similar to all the other projects mr. the third floor. phase 1 and phase 2, the rehab department was completed in the plan area shown in the light blue. our current work of phase 3 is highlighted in yellow the new out-patient urology clinic, waste holding area and new accessible restrooms. currently the about 51 )our multiplearea has the lls erected on working on the

partition i this ongoing and have framing instillation the 3c accessible restrooms ar starting thconstruction with our construction barriers. here a summary of the contract amount. the original construction 3 million, 0, 258 thousand, 417 dollars for revised contract amount of--sorry, that is a error.$9 million. the approvede 10 percent of the original contract amremaining is 114 thousand 665. for the contract duration, the original duration of substantial completion and final completion was 550 with approved reserves of 55 days. we have not approved any days to date. in summary, what we are asking for today is an additional percent of

559, 624 thousand for authorized contract limit of 4 million, 663 thousand, the construction duration, we are asking for additional request of 395 days for total duration of 1,000 days. and projected final completion 20, 20 this slide helps summarize the change approved or executed to date. 1-3 totaling 258, 417 dollars ha this summary in the top right summarizes those executed to date, witherrors of 329 thousand. sorry, 123 thousand. 123 58 unforeseen of 250 a client request and

code related issue of 65 thousand. as you see on the right, we do a usders to our approval process. two design errors specifically requested was one that was related to as this project was bid out between phase 1 and phase 2, versus phase 3, m the set. they were separate tors and so piping was missing and added as a cost of 83 thousand, 754. the other design error was a si exam lights. it was found it was not additional and needed to be added to two exam rooms and totaled $39.623. one of the major rs we are seeking approval for that we approved but not yet executed because it exceeds 10 percent limit is the time extension due to unforeseen conditions related to existing

conditions, framing conditions, mold, as well as hand over from to occupancy that delayed the construction process. that totaling to 211 calendar days, with 133 of days being compensable and associated cost of $163.324. ase jobefore working, very + complex and challenging campus. renovation projmuch mothen new construction, but when you are trying to keep a impact to the hospital, it could and often ge orders exceed the 10 percent construction cost or construction duration contingencies. we have exist1970 building, reinforced concreate structure that require expertise in scanning and delays. there is many unforestesed to mechanical

electrical and plumb and architectural components. we have environmental health y procedures and infection control plans can delay the start of the work. in this case particular,b the rehab phase 3 started 190 days after due to approval that infection control work plan. and lastly, we are under the jurisdiction of e healthcare organization information. this requires additional oversight through material operations. we have field walks with staff. review from the field staff officers oversight from the inspector of record. approval of this contract modification will allow public works to continue complete the work. in summary, again, today we are seeking increase contract cost and duration contingency by $559.624.71 and

395 consecutive calendar days. thank you. >> thank you very much. nice to see you king us through last week. how quickly you pulled together the presentation after learning late last week. you answered all my questions and thank you very much. i thought it was a mr. chen's present i think they went together very nicely. commissioner zoubi. >> can we go back to page 22? >> page 22. >> we don't have this presentation in - >> it should be a contins presentation. >> thank you. it was a clear informative presentation and the page, the break-down of the reasons why love to see future presentation for all

presentations we get. this is--so, we asked all these questions. what is going on? why is there extension of time?put it up, please? >> i'm showing it on my computer. >> yeah, on the >> yeah. >> this is great. you even worked on the extension, how long that cost. how much that will cost the project. commend you on this. i haven't seen this before and like to make request any extension and increase in the future to have this.breakdown, so we-anyone now can look at this and say okay, i thank you. >> no problem. our dpw public works team cm team does a good job tracking and vetting all the change orders. they go through rigorous analysis. we don't approve them easily and always have backup documentation.

>> i share commissioner zoubi's this. if you can bring up one more time page 22. it just--the items listed on the left, start seeing this regularly and tracking it we can see trends in all this on how often is the client requested delays how often unforeseen coaware the civil grand jury criticized the department for of issues and we will always need to be able to when we can say we are tracking the reasons for things and we will always admit when it is public works mistake or , but we also need to always understand when it is out of anyone's control, such as unforeseen condition and the like. when it is client request. i are agree, this is a great table to see in reports going forward.

commissioner turner. >> just be clear, is that table produced as software? >> it is from the construction management group. they tabulate every request and are ahn before we have final numbers have a projection. review process. if it is above a threshold we have a third party estimator to eare view it and once it approved each change order is tagged with a type ging from design omission or design ient requested change unforeseen condition is the common, code changes, we also have categories that are a result of in the panko contract of cmgc or preconstruction, a item missed ybe used for contiancy, so typically maybe not exactly the same way, but the teams are tracking it through an excel log. >> great. i just want to echo my colleagues,

because i think if we think and performance metric you can use theseknow if you [indiscernible] but i do think these are those areasee fluctuations given they are utilizing the software that can help us consolidate information in a meaningful way so commend you and think that is a great idea. >> thank you. if there are no more comments, i will this contract modification. is is there great. please open this comment, secretary fuller. >> members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment in person on the motion to approve item 4n, originally on the consent calendar, the zuckerberg san francisco building 5 rehab department relocation phase 3 contract modification, may line up against the wall. the chamber, press raise your hand or star 3 on your phone to be recognized.

no one approached to speak in person anany callers who expresse concludes public comment on item 4 and the motion to approve it. >> thank you. there is no further discussion or z'all in favor of the motion please say aye or yes? aye. the motion passes and the contract modification is approved. thank you for coming today and the resolution will be posted alrighty. secretary fuller, please call our next item of business. >lmotion to designate authorize the commissioner to respond to the civil grand jury report from june 20, 2024. chair post has volunteered to draft the sponse and will discuss this action and this is an action item. >> thank you. secretary fuller noted as you all know the commission has been requested to respond to findings and

recommendations in the civil grand jury report. we are not required to do so, but it is just request, but of course we will do so. what i was going to propose is that iaft up a proposed response from the commission nsideration at our retreat next monday the 29 and we will discuss the grand jury report among ourselves and with staff, and then we can discuss our response to this quest and so, i can clean it up with secretary fuller and we can return it to the judge by the august 19 deadline since we won't be meeting again between july 29 and the august 19 deadline.special meeting but we are not planning to betweeis my goal. it is an ambitious goal for myself, but i intend to meet it. that is what is going on here and why webe nice to officially designate me to draft response subject to your

approval at our next meeting. commissioner turner. >> chair post, i don't know if there is develop a letter around street conditions and we are grateful that you got our consensus and developed a letter and believe it was issued so that is the same process we are following here and that should be the process we follow here, given it is job the commission, so i just move thatpost, we approve you drafting necessary and applicable to the civil grand jury. >> i second that motion. >> thank you. we'll ta3i >> members of the public who mathree minutes of comment in person on the motion to designate respond to grand t may line up.

w[be recognized. approached to speak and have interest in speaking either. ç >> thank you. all in favo please say or yes. it carries. . much. good. next is new business. call that item. >> item 8 is iated by commissioners and this is a opportunity for commissioners to suggest business for a future agenda and it is a informational item. >> thank you. i do not have new business. any of my colleagues have new business to initiate? hearing none, please open this item to public comment. >> members of the public who wish to make three minutes of comment on item 8, new business initiated by commissioners may line up against the if commenting from the chamber, press raise your hand button in the webinar or star 3 on

your phone to be recognized. we do have one commenter person. you have three minutes to speak. do you have anything to present? your time begins now. >> i like to offer that the biking and rolling plan by the mta has not ted to this commission. i love to be proven wrong, but at point my understandin a year of community outreach, if more, they yet to discuss what that really looks like. i argue new business should include a call by public works to request presentation from the people who are putting th to discuss it, especially given the fact it is a currently curb to curb program and does not include any new designs for sidewalks. to that same end, i offer this commission should have some sensitivity to small wheel access.

i'm excited to see there is a vacancy and look forward putting in a application for it because i missing from this space. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. it does not appear we have any other inperson commenters and there are no urther callers who have requested to speak on this item either. >> thank you. we'll goes into closed session and do not anticipate further commission business conducted out of closed session so staff doesn't have to hang around if they dont i will note, as i mentioned we will be having a special meeting a week from today, monday the 29 off-site. it is more a informal retreat rather then a meeting and it the the public works commission response to the civil grand jury report of june on public infrastructure delivery. our next regular meeting where our normal business will take place

will be at the end of summer monday september 9. i wish everybody a summer until then. alrighty. yes, do i hear a motion and second to enter closed session? >> so moved. >> alright. and then given the motion we will turn to public comment. >> members of the public who wish to comment on the motion to enter closed session to discuss the director's evaluation may line up against the wall furthest from the door and if you are commenting from outside the chamber, press raise your hand or star 3 on your phone to be recognized. proached to speak on this item and we do not have any callers at this time, so that concludes public comment. >> alright.

hearing no further questions or comments, all in favor of entering or aye. alrighty. we will move to closed session and all members of the public and staff not part of the leave the hearing room and we'll take a few minutes for peo [meeting reconvened] >> we have entered-exted closed session. please call the next item on da. >> item 10 is announcement following >> thank you. there are no announcements following the closed session. secretary fuller, please open this item to public comment. lic who wish to comment on 10, announcement following closed session may line up agqlainst the wall furthest from the door. commenting outside the chamber press raise your hand in webinar or star 3 on your phone to be no one approached and no on the line to speak on it either, so that concludes public comment. >> thank you. please call the next item on

the agenda. >> item 11 is th whether to disclose discussion during closed session. >> thank you. i move that we not disclose the discussion heard during closed session. is there a second to my motio >> second. >> thank you. please open the public comment. >> members oic who wish to comment on there motion to not disclose discussion during closed session may line up against the wall and commenthe chamber, press the raise your hand button in the inar or star 3 on your phone to be recognized. we have no one in person to speak on this item, and no one is on the phone waiting to speak either, so that concludes public comment. >> thank you.ofto not disclose discussion of closed session say aye or yes. the motion passes unanimously. and i believe secretary fuller we do not need the next item, item 12, the general public comment, correct? >> that's correct. 12 is not necessary.

>> great. we are now adjourned.very much. thank you for helping out today. sorry it took so long. thank you very much. [meeting adjourned] (music). >> i started the o a financing and had a business partner all ended up wanting to

start the retire and i did waso me so i bought them oust and two weeks later the pandemic h-4 one of the moments i thought to myself we have to have the worse business a lifetime or the best. >> we created the oasis out of a need basically so other people bars and turning them into space and when the last performing wasn't used turned those buildings into condos so we decided to have a space. >> what the pandemic did for us is made us on of that we felt

had to do this immediately and created this. >> where we would offer food delivery services with a curbside professionalism live music to bring spe lives we are going through and as well as employ on the caterers and the performers and drivers very for that i think also for everyone to something. we hadthe roof and and with a restaurant to support the system where we are and even with that had terribly to have an old-fashioned one we

created you can watch to online or be on the phone and raised over one quarter oar that incredible and something that northbound we could do. >> we got ourselves back and made me realize how for that people will show up if i was blown away but also had commitment now i can't let anyone down i have to make the space serviceable s this is a full process it became much more about a space used by the community. and it became less about starting up a business and more about the heart of what we'doing. this building used to be a- and one

of the first one we working on had we came out what a mural to the building and took a while but able to raise the money and pay 5 artists to make a design around many this to represent what is happening on the side and also important this is who we are this is us putting it out there because satisfies other people we don't realize how much we affect the community around there when he show up and show ourselves outside of those fabulous. and inspires other people to be more fabulous and everyone want to be more fabulous and less hatred and hostility and that is how we change the

[music] the opening on third and mission the grove epicenter.community. we bring tourist, we bring convention ears and have a huge group of locers who live here. we are theiliving room and love to see them on a regular and seek newcomers to the city of san francisco and serve themof san francisco ke everything in house from scratch every dape we vahand carved [indiscernible] the chicken pot pie red thousand if not more. roasted chicken, prime rib,

salad[indiscernible] coffee cake and rnible] all the pies are fresh baked. the home made once, twice a day, depending how fast they go. we believe in old fashion home cooked food. we want to be a welcoming, warm hospitable place for everyone to come and hang respond time with friends and family, meet new people. have rtant conversation. relax and enjoy, rejuvenate, restored, enjoy one another and the at mus sphere the growth. gk over 730 days a week, breakfast, lunch and dinner. >> sanitation and streets commnone day july 15, 2024 and is 1003 a.m. secretary fuller,

pleasé?e call >> good morning. please respond with, here, or present. present. ope is present.]. chair hartwig-schulman is present and christopher simi has with four membersprint we have quorum for sanitation streets commission. public comment for ional and action items on