are stone of san francisco's commitment to young children and families. create and sustain high quality childcare space. someone who worked on this project i see first, hand the informative impact over the years them program enabled providers to improve, comband capacity and serve the families. especially in under served neighborhoods. continuing to fund the programming ensure the legacy of success allows more families to access the childcare that they need. thank you. >> there has been how high up a percentage. [inaudible] in autism autism

according to our program is due to lack of socialization. people the children don't socialize. last year [inaudible] preschool center, the motion was academics. natural school and parks and libraries. and another thing is one when we have [inaudible] love, trust and trust the make sure they go to school that teachers and providers make sure the schools [inaudible]. >> thank you. >> thank you for sharing your

comments >> that completes our queue >> public comment is closed. >> supervisor melgar would you like to make a motion >> thank you make a motion we sends this to the board with positive recommendation. >> roll call, please. >> on had motion by member melgar forwarded to the boor with positive recommendation. member melgar. >> aye >> chair chan. >> aye. >> we have two with vice chair mandelman combuzed. >> motion pass with this i will call an item out of order item 26. >> 26. >> yep >> okay >> item number 26. >> a resolution approving and authorizationing the direct of property on behalf of child support services to lose real property approximately 15. 5,000 rental square feet and 2

thousand of storage space at 101 new mont gom row street. 617 mission street from mc clain properties and 1 where are 1 month gom rew street for 7 year term commencing january first, 25 through december 2032. an initial base rent of 580,000 with rent increases of 3% plus 5 year option to extend and authorize the director of property to enter in amendments or modifications to the lease this don't increase the obligations nor liabilities to the city. >> we have our director here. the floor is yours >> good afternoon. chair chan. director of real estate. will at first i like to thank you chair chan and your staff for encountering this time matter on a busy schedule.

i like to extend thanks to president peskin for sponsorship. >> before you this afternoon on a new lease at 101 new month gom rew or sick 17 mission street on behalf of child support service. this lease extends css's occupancy at the site. they have been there since march of 1995. the terms of the deal are favorable. commence am date is february 2025 it is 15,000 square feet plus up to 2 thousand square feet of basement storage. lease term is 7 years. base rent is 556 thousand dollars, fully serviced except electricity. basement storage is 24 thousand

dollars per year or 12 dollars per square foot. escalation on the rentses are 3%. the base year is 2025. well is a smallt i allowance of 75 thousand dollars for pin and carpeting to refresh the floor. there is also one option to extend for 5 years. css serves 7,000 children and 8,000 case and fiscal year 23, are css is 100% supported by the state. so the lose will have zero impact on the general fund. >> loom is in impact on the general fund the lease represents a savings for css. we cut premesis in half. going from 34,000 square feet down top 15,000. cut the base rent 20 dollars per

square foot from 56 dollars down to 36 dollars per square foot. why are weave not considering a buy option for this? first, the property is zone in the family trust and the owners refuse to sell. second, neither the state nor the city has money for a purchase opportunity. and lastly, css occupies two floors a 6 story building. most of the buildings in the your are medium to high rise and find other occupants to partner with css to make a buying tune a reasonable business decision. karen roy the executive director was here in the earlier session. unfortunately show had to get become to her office. that concludes my presentation.

>> item 26 to approve a new lease at 101 new montgomery street. has a 7 year term and optional 5 year extension. terms on page 85 of our report. it is for office space for the department child service. and the lease so there is a current lease at the site expireing month. that lease is about 1 million dollars a year this the base rent is 585 thousand dollars per year initial low. so the new lease does reflect the new market rate of office space in san francisco which is 36 dollars a square foot. over the senor term of the lease, the department would pay 4.4 million dollars in rent costs funded by the state.

and recommend approval of item 26. >> thank you. yol am nothing compared to having your rent cut in half. on annual base i i appreciate the negotiation and appreciate your work on this, like to see more of this type of am renegotiated leases that contain to the reflect the current market to look us in the space and look forward to continuing to see along with city add administrator chu to talk about how we do assets management and be may be less leasing and more of owning some of the space begin where the market is today. but i like that balance approach and where we see cost saving we will take it. joo i agree and thank you are chair chan >> thank you, go to public comment.

>> we have no speakers. >> public comment is closed. and mr. clerk, going to move the item to full board i roll call, please >> on this motion to forward this to the board with a positive recommendation. member melgar. >> aye. >> chair chan. >> aye >> we have two aye's with vice chair mandelman excused. >> motion passes. we will go back to the order of the agenda and mr. clerk call item 19 >> item 19 a resolution approving amendment number 5 to grant agreement with the office of economic and workforce development and mid market foundation for management of the mid market center community based safety from increase the grant amount by 7.7 million not

to exceed amount of 68. 8 million. the period of july 22 through june 25. effective upon approval by the board of supervisors and the director of the on whiches economic and workforce develop to enter in modifications to the contract prior to the final execution by all parties. that don't increase the obligations nor liabilities to the city and necessary for the purposes of the agreement. madam chair. >> next. san francisco office of economic and workforce development w. middle east is sam the director of the street response cordination from the san francisco d. emergency management. start by talk about this agreement purpose and history. batch lorp programs part of a recovery effort. designed to increase safety, actual and perception in areas

they operate. this contract was awarded and amended 4 times. increasing the duration of the contract and increasing the not to exceed amount. >> latest amendment was on november first, 2023 with that amount. rise to 61 million. this amendment going forward there say propoedz amendment increase it by 7 million for a total not to exceed 68 million, 858 thousand dollars continue base service reinstaithe 4 million dollars reduce in the the 24 budget ask restore in the the 25 budget through june 25. would expand service and locations with 3. 7 million budgeted in funding from various departments. through june 25 limp is a

proposed revised amendment instead will increase the grant amount. not to exceed 64 million, 851 thousand dollars. continue the base and xabdz 've expand service this expireos june 30 of 2025, for w to continue a new and procure am will have to be issued and new contract executed. like to pass it over to sam from emergency management. on the screen is the current deployment map funds through this contract and able to proceed. if this proposed lower amount or would be able to continue to the

end of the fiscal year. i will note there are areas here that have been expansions and able to believe do together with the d mack operations to address areas like mid plaza and van ness and market and lark and i know polk that are not included in this. the mid market tenderloin community safety program best known for the deployment of urban alchemy practitioners. that might be better understood as street corny mediators. they are deployed address incidents using trauma, nonviolent prosocial intervention. . and provide resources and services. such as over dose reversals. service agencies and organizations to individual in crisis and address physical disorder.

sweeping loiter washing feces on sidewalks. they are deployed 7 days a week. assigned to the same area for months to develop ties and trust with residents businesses and others. practitioners are hired for lived experience. and cull roll competency. draw on these with training support and super vision and relationships with people to curtail the activity and responded to behavioral healing crisis. here you see some of the out come from last fiscal year. positive engage. i think it is explained but this can be directions or referral says to service or other information.

inviting space intervention. can be practitioners and stake hold tore join in creating a safe space and inviting space for all and shared social norms.

twice's year in the contract a survey for residents and people who use the public space in the bottom shows the positive results from the last survey. dm, we work to support the contract. and we meet weekly with the contractors and the subcontractors and new stake holders around operations. and we also set up systems for you know occurrence or incident trackings to reach to follow up and follow through on any incidents. that happen with practitioners

to street response and as far as the drug market agency cordination centers and as far as any support provided in the tenderloin and mid market area. and finds ways they spread out and cover more territory and support each other when needed. >> thank you very much. and we are here to answer questions. >> thank you. item 19 is a resolution that approves a -- grant agreement amendment between the office of economic and workforce development. 7. 8 to the existing grant

agreement.

the street conscience in the tenderloin have in the improved they decided to reverse the ramp down plan. and in addition to that 2.3 million dollars here for extending the program hours on segments of market street from 7 p.m. when most of the ambassadors program ends to 11. . 30 p.m. and 1. 4 million dollars forraly ways the request of sociality service agency in san francisco that is funded by the 3 want dids we detailed the changes on page 68 of our report. i do have a couple considerations for the committee to consider. one is that -- i think the grant

tracks like activities of the ambassador in terms how many they are speaking to. the city collects dataeda about street conscience. 911 calls and park calls. 311 calls. street conditions and trash this public works releases a report on every year. that information i think could be better used and applied when making the decision around this service. um, i think as the department explain they'd have a more informal process for mote with stake holders to identify needs. and deploy am decisions. i think that could be the city could do more with the existing information it has already at its if anything are tips. i think that would go a long we

in explaining yet ramped down plan was reversed. i think in the future to the extent the city wants to extend it to next fiscal year. that could be defined the rfp process and new grant the other point is that -- there is a lot of administrative costs in this contract. this grant is with the mid market foundation and the they subcontract to -- urban alchemy and the other subcontracts you know for other am das bas dorse and so there is a lot of indirect costs skimmed off the top and each layers. and i don't think that needs to be the relationship that the city has with the providers. the city could contract directly with a provider in a new rfp process. if we look at the two year grant

for last fiscal year 1 and a half million dollars in administrative costs this is enough to funds 100 people through a residential drug treatment program. or 275 people in and out patient program. i raise that point because the bulk of the contract is funded by opioid settlesment money. i think that the structure of this contracting relationship could be improved and made cost effective in the new procurement and the city's contract directly with an ambassador provider. happy to answer questions. >> thank you me question is buzz now we are talking about you know the bulk and may be first i want to confirm this, i think you are saying a bulk of this is funded by the opioid

settlement? >> the existing grant budget which we show on page 68 of our report, was 16 mission this year. opioid funded 11.2 million dollars of the 16. >> can we just have a confirm thagz is the case for this fiscal year. i was trying to ask for that answer to member me not the settle am spending. but i was directed to department of public health i'm now trying toned if we have an answer to that question >> thank you, jack english the mayor's budget office that is correct. a portion of the opioid settle am money is sent from dph to the office of workforce development. to your question, at large to

the director, dph can give a holistic view. this is one component within oewd's budget from dph throughout opioid settlement >> great. that is an outstanding question just outside of the entire budget conversation as we prepare for tackling the ballooning budget defy sits the mayor breed actually issue instructions for us to tackle. the deficit. i like to understand the opioid settlement funding how we will move forward and are is this program qualifying to the spending that if wore spending according to the legislative analyst spending 1.2 million dollars for administrative cost? and we can find identifying cost

savings again based on this current contract, especially if we move forward i like it see that. i don't have a lot of questions i wanted confirm mr. dodge or mr. corp us we near agreement for reducing from the 7. 7 to 3.7 million dollars. for the funding. which indicated that from what i understand while expiring june 302025. should latch you until april 2025. thank you, chair chan we are in agreement >> help me understand which point because you are budgeted 16 million dollars. and that now you decided that you know total 3 opinion 7 million previously clearly not you but as the administration determine said that 7.7 mission

on top of the 16 million. but that is more than what you budgeted in during the budget process because you budgeted for 4 million. help us understand the decision instead of the commitment of ramping down the covid program. and you extending it:ask colleagues since are not answer figure this is okay with you. >> chair, thank you. department. emergency management. there is -- all the funds were approved in the budget it was the department of public health and the d. aging service they came with a plea for ambassador support for willow al and he polk street they have two critical programs colocated in a

building and needed to some support. so. and were -- they asked to be able to join in with this project work order funding they had to support this in this contract. and two, was not everything came before the board in extension of the hotel as a temporary shelter and dialogue with the board of supervisors and the public stake holders and hsh around the need for you know -- this program to be on that street of elis street. so it was hsh was looking for a way to deploy this in a rapid way to comply with stake holder agreements and trying to find a way they could enters in their own contract or find one they had that could accommodate this and they asked to be able to join in with this contract. and so those other two.

>> how many teams or ambassadors are under your management? best practices and try to work together with the upon different teams. there is private and public entities and we have a website to play it out it is complex mechanisms. how many does the city very much 18? finish it. >> no. >> how many? >> it dependses what you call a street team there are 5 major ones. which 5? san francisco homeless out reach team. the dph best neighborhoods team.

which is there is extreme medicine which is with best. b 1 or two teams. and you know the i'm sorry i was not ready for this and i definitely have a presentation we gave you you know 2 hour hearing and i got that information i'm happy to give it to you it is not 18. how many ambassadors. i think the question at the end of the day. i think for the city for the board of supervisors we my colleagues dean preston has legislation i think which requires street teams reporting back. correct?