this sunday the strange twists and turns of the 2012 presidential race. president obama tries to quiet critics who say he wasn't born in the u.s. by releasing his long form birth certificate, setting up a showdown with donald trmp who inches closer to getting in the race. >> i did something nobody else could do. i got obama to give his birth certificate, and it was about time. >> we do not have time for this kind of silliness. we got better stuff to do. >> what about the real issues? jobs? government red ink and the debate over taxes and spending now gripping washington? with us for an assessment this morning of the political landscape, independent mayor of new york city, michael bloomberg. republican governor of virginia, bob mcdonnell, plus former

senior white house adviser to the president and now campaign strategist of the obama reelection campaign, david axelrod. then the views from freshman senator and up and coming gop star mike arubio of florida. plus, the debt ceiling debate, america's role in libya and the prospects for the republican party struggling to attract minority voters. finally, after a week like this, you just got to laugh. >> donald trump has been saying he'll run for president as a republican, which is surprising, since i just assumed he was running as a joke. >> inside political comedy from the star of last night's white house correspondent center and head writer for saturday night live, seth meyers. >> from nbc news in washington, "meet the press" with david gregory. >> good morning.

big news developing overseas this weekend in libya. muammar gadhafi has survived a nato air strike on a tripoli house that reportedly claimed the lives of his youngest son and three grandchildren. this according to a government spokesperson. u.s. security officials say they believe such attacks may be the only way to force gadhafi from power. and in rome, the late pope john paul ii moved a step closer to sainthood as he was celebrated during a joyous ceremony that drew more than a million people to st. peters square. back in washington, the congress returns from a two-week spring recess. i'm joined by mayor michael bloomberg. david axelrod, white house adviser and strategist of the 2012 bid, and also bob

mcdonnell. welcome to all of you. i want to start with mayor bloomberg to talk about some crucial matters that are really determining the reelection fight, but also the debate here in washington, and that is the economy. here is the cover of "the economist" magazine that caught my eye this week with the statue of liberty on the cover. here's what they say. the economy is recovering, yet american confidence remines mired at levels more commonly seen in recessions. for that blame unemployment, petrol prices and a deeper, nagging feeling that america is in decline. a gal, up poll in february asked americans to name the world's leading power, and they said china. this is obama's presidency from 2009, high point in october, 10.1%, now we're at 8%. what kind of recovery is this, mayor? >> when you come out of a

recession, the first thing people do is tighten their belt and try to do more with less. it's not surprising that corporate prices are going up and governments are finding ways to provide services with fewer people. it is only a little further into the recovery that you start to add more people, companies are willing to take risks, governments think their tax base is going to be better and start expanding services and hiring people to provide that. like anything else, some parts of the country are doing poorly, some are doing well. new york city, for example, is doing better. we're not back to where we were before, but we're doing better. i think what's happening here in this country is petroleum prices. the industry is less dependent on petroleum than it used to be, but if you drive a car, you're very dependent on petroleum, and four-plus dollars for gas is something americans find very difficult to work into their budget and they don't have a lot of choice. the price of food has gone up

dramatically, and statistics don't show the impact on individual families because they cover a lot of different costs. having said all that, there are some bright spots. i think if you want to go buy a house, and if you can afford it, you're secure in your job, mortgage rates are low, housing prices continue to fall, you can get great bargains and you shouldn't wait until the end. the most important thing, however, is jobs. we have a great mismatch in this country between the skill sets of those that are unemployed and the demand in industry and in government for people with a very different set of abilities. and it's a function of years and years, decades, of poor schools and not training people. >> well, this disconnect where we hear that the economy is getting better, stock market is improving, so much has gone on on wall street to get healthy again, with the major banks getting healthy again, and yet we're in this state where you have stubbornly high unemployment. >> well, there's a couple different things here. one, there is a crisis of confidence, and the one that really is worrisome is not just when you go out and say, do you feel better or worse about the

economy, it is a crisis of confidence among business people. they look at washington and they say, you can't run something this way. no company would survive if you ran it the way washington runs where they focus on small issues that have nothing to do with the real america, on issues they ka can't come together on. the most obvious one is immigration. this is a company that was built on immigrants, this is a company that became a superpower because of its immigrant population, and unless we continue to have immigrants, we cannot maintain as a superpower. i give you an example of how you can fix some of the problems in america. take a look at the big, old, industrial cities, detroit, for example. they have a great mayor, mayor bing, but the population has left. you have to do something about that, and if i were the federal government, assuming you could wave a magic wand and pull everyone together, you pass a law letting immigrants come in as long as they agreed to go to detroit and live there five or ten years. start businesses, take jobs,

whatever. you would populate detroit overnight because half the world wants to come here. we whip ourselves a little bit too much. we still have the world's greatest democracy, we still have hope that if you want to have a better life for yourself and your kids, this is where you want to come, and you could use something like immigration policy at no cost for the federal government to fix a lot of the problems that we have. >> let me ask you about taxes. big debate in washington over the future of taxes for the wealthy, for the middle class. do you think it's possible to bring the budget into balance? >> if you don't just raise taxes on wealthy americans but also on those so-called middle class making $250,000. >> last week they said the bush cuts should expire for everyone. >> what democrats have to understand is you can never balance the budget unless you make meaningful changes in entitlemen entitlements. we used to have 30-odd people supporting every retiree, now it's 3 people supporting every

retiree. the government has to understand we can't get through this with the same entitlements we had with benefits, and expect people to pay those benefits. you also can't balance the budget just with cuts. the american people, whether they vote republican or democrat, in the end they don't want their programs cut back, particularly the big ones, medicare, medicaid, social security, those kinds of things. i thought the alan simpson and erskin bowles came up in their committee with exactly the right answer. you can tweak it, you can change some small things. i assume the gang of six will come up with something similar. you have to have some combination of cuts and expenses and some revenue enhancements, call it taxes, whatever you want, and i was talking to erskin yesterday. his idea is 25% increasing revenue and three-quarters in terms of cutting expenses and some ratio like that is the solution. how much chaos and destruction to our economy we have to do before everybody in washington starts acting like an adult,

coming together and not pandering to small voting blocks but saying, hey, this is in the interest of the country. i'm not going to do a poll, find out where my constituents are and follow them. we need leadership from the front. that's true in congress, it's true to the other end of pennsylvania avenue, it's true on both sides of the aisle, it's true in states. the governor is very proactive and he's steered virginia through some very tough times, but he's done it by making decisions and pulling together, and people know where they stand with this government in virginia, and that's what we need to have in america. >> let me widen this discussion out to all of us here at the table and we'll get back to the economy. i want to touch on some other issues, though, that are part of the political dialogue, for sure. the economy is certainly the backdrop. governor mcdonnell, the tornado damage has just been horrific throughout the south. we have a map here that shows just how devastating it's been throughout alabama, georgia, tennessee, mississippi, and virginia as well had significant damage. 342 deaths, 288 tornadoes.

this kind of outbreak has not been seen in this country. as much as $5 billion in insured losses. the president and the first lady were touring the damage in alabama on friday, getting down there with folks. both in terms of what you've gone through in virginia and assessing the president's response, how would you rate it? >> it's been heartbreaking. we've had three weeks in a row with catastrophic damage and loss of life in virginia. over 25 tornadoes reported. i've been there as recently as friday to view the damage. we're not used to that in virginia. but i tell you what i see. if the plans from the first responder works like it's supposed to, while the american people might disagree on some things, when we're attacked or have a catastrophe like this, we bind together and work together better than any other country on earth. the president called me on thursday saying the federal government will do anything they could to help. secretary napolitano followed

up, and we've declared a state emergency, and now we're asking for some federal help for isolated counties that have been particularly affected. i think the system is working as good as they can, but it is going to be a long road back for some of these communities, particularly alabama and mississippi. but weaver g've got some people hurting in virginia now. >> david axelrod, you're inside the white house, outside the white house, but certainly top adviser to the president, still, as he campaigns for reelection. i mentioned at the top of the program the strange twists and turns of the presidential race. we're talking about the economy and jobs. there are huge distractions, and we saw that play out this week. the president released his long form birth certificate to try to quiet people who actually still believed he was -- >> he released earlier the short form birth certificate. >> right, and he had to get a special waiver to release the whole thing. this came about in part because donald trump, who may be a presidential candidate, was talking about the need to do this. this was the scene that played out on wednesday, a kind of

split screen america between donald trump and president obama. watch this exchange. >> today i'm very proud of myself because i've accomplished something that nobody else has been able to accomplish. i was just informed, while on the helicopter, that our president has finally released a birth certificate. >> we're not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by side shows and carnival barkers. >> why did the white house wait this long to do this? >> let me say i'm happy that we could contribute to mr. trump's self-image, that he feels good about himself, proud. he needs that little ego boost. >> yeah. >> the reality is, it isn't -- you say it became a distraction. donald trump didn't make the decision to put himself on a split screen. donald trump didn't make the decision to cover this over and over and over again once he raised the issue, and the president's point was the day

after he made a speech on this issue that the mayor was talking about that's so important to our country, which is how do we solve this debt problem in a way that is balanced and fair and serves our future, the president did an interview, answered a lot of questions about it, got one question on the birther issue, and on the evening news that night, that led the news. at that moment the president said, you know what, we've got to put a stop to this. he wanted to make the point we have more important issues in this country and we ought to move on. the point was, frankly, david, to your industry as much as anything else. >> if republicans ever have a chance of getting into the white house, they have to get off issues like the birther issue. we need to talk about the economy and the deficit and immigration and health care and lots of social problems here and not waste our time talking about frivolousness. >> governor mcdonnell, why is it republican leaders have not stood up while this was going on and said, this is nonsense. speaker boehner was on this program and said, look, i can't tell people what to believe.

can't he? >> i've said that. i thought it was a waste of time. the problem with the president, it's not where he was born, it's some of the policies he's advocating. the feeble attempt, i think, to get our debt in control with the proposal in the president's budget really are at issue in this campaign. we're $14 trillion, and under the president's proposal, we'll be under 20. that's the crisis in america. until we have serious dialogue about that and reduce r do you say -- reducing spending, including entitlements, like the president said. i think that's a side issue. >> the president said this himself in the white house, standing up. the president gets out there and does it. was this motivated by a sense of, hey, i am going to raise donald trump up to beat him down and say, hey, this is the republican party. >> it wasn't about donald trump, it was about the media fascination with this, and because we agree, we ought to have the debate the governor is

talking about. both the president and the republican party say we have to deal with this issue. we both have proposals. the difference is the president thinks we have to do this in a balanced way that's fair. if you essentially do away with medicare, as it true under the republican proposal, and at the same time give $200,000 tax breaks, a trillion one in new tax breaks to millionaires and the wealthy, that is not a prescription for a better america. if you slash education by 25%, if you slash research and development and clean energy activities by 70%, this is a prescription for economic failure and an imbalance in our country, and that's what we should be talking about. and so that's why he spoke out on that. >> one more thing on this birther issue. is racism involved? does the president believe that? >> i'm not going to -- i've not had that discussion with him, and frankly, i'm not going to entertain that question. i don't think that's a worthy question. because --

>> you may not think so, but there are a lot of african-americans who think it's offensive the president has to go up there and defend this. >> i don't think it was just african-americans, i think a lot of americans were offended by it of all stripes. we're a country, and the mayor can speak to this. he has the most diverse city in the country. we're a nation of immigrants. we come from all over the world. there are americans of every stripe and every background who have built this country, and that whole episode was offensive to a lot of people. but the point is, we've got big challenges in this country. we've got big problems. we have a big debate of how we build a better future and we ought to get through it. >> mayor, on the cover of "bloomberg businessweek" is donald trump. not on this issue but with a simple question. does he have a real voice in this campaign if he gets to issues of what he has contributed in business? >> anyone can run. he has a right to run. he is a new york icon, bigger than life in a lot of things,

and he can put himself into the mix. there are an awful lot of people whose names surface looking to potential ly be the republican candidate in 2012. some will fall by the wayside really quickly when they realize what they have to do in terms of disclosure, raising criticism from the press and raising money. >> you call him an icon. is he worth serious consideration? >> that's up to the voters. i'm not going to pick any one candidate and say they are or they aren't. the nice thing about america is you get a chance to go out there and make your case. i will say, however, and it talks to david's point and the governor's. when you talk about the problems facing this country, and they both talked about the deficit going forward, i've always thought we do this wrong. we take a look at the deficits and say we've got to cut. we should stop and say, what do we need to keep this country going? whether it's education or research or defense or a variety of other services. these are the services we

absolutely need if we're going to keep america, the great country that it is and the land of opportunity. then try to find out what it's going to cost to do it efficiently and then go and have a debate about how you raise the money. you can spend less, you can get more coming in, but you don't start with -- there's nothing magical about deficit as opposed to making sure the streets are safe. there's nothing magical about a deficit as making sure we're protected from terrorists. there is nothing magical in the deficit in the context of if we don't educate our kids, they don't have a future and we don't have a tax base down the road. so we're all looking at this the wrong way. the debate should be whether or not government should provide this kind of education, that kind of education, this kind of defense policy, that kind of defense policy, not let the money drive it. we're spending money we don't have, we shouldn't be doing it, but the first and most important thing is what are we going to do to keep this country safe and growing. >> i think we're a lot closer to

that thinking than you suggest. that's exactly what the president is saying. we have certain responsibilities. one is to be fiscally responsible, but we also have a responsibility to our future, we have a social contact that we have to keep with our senior citizens, with our children to educate them and give them the tools to compete. there are certain things we know what we have to do. that ought to guide our decision making here. it's not just an exercise. >> governor, what about the pessimism in the country? what do you see in virginia as people struggle in a state that still has unemployment so high? >> it's a business. we're down to 6.3% unemployment. we've gone from 9% unemployment in the last six months. i think we're there because we made a lot of tough decisions in the last year, david. we cut the balance to a $6 million deficit. it included education, it included health care.

yeah, there was some short term pain, but we ran a surplus in six months and we're coming back. the government has a balanced budget amendment. we can't make excuses, we can't form committees, we can't kick the can down the road, we can't increase the deficit willy-nilly, we have to make tough decisions. that's what i think the congress and the president need to do. most of this deficit has been run up by republican presidents in the last 30 years. it's a bipartisan congress and we need bipartisan cooperation to get it fixed. >> you're a good guy, and i commend you for this operation. your predecessor made a huge deficit, but you also borrowed money in the recovery act, you balanced your budget by borrowing $3 billion against future receipts on transportation to fund your transportation program. you borrowed money from your pension plan that you're going to have to return, and you did it because you were managing through difficult times, and you

didn't want to burden the taxpayers of your state through these difficult times, but those bills are going to have to be paid. so you are wrestling with the same problems that the president, governor and marthe mayors are wrestling with and there are no easy answers. >> the federal government for the longest time, 30 years after the second world war, we cut the deficit every year. the last 30 we, for the most part, ratcheted it up. 70% of the gdp ran it up. for most people they don't get why congress can't find a way to cut the deficit and balance the budget. >> when you borrow millions of dollars from future receipts and you borrow money from your pension system and you say the budget is balanced, the next governor has to wrestle with that. i know you only have one more term there, but the next governor has to work with that. >> handling the economy, if you look at recent polling on this, that's still an area of considerable weakness for him.

57% disapprove of his handling of the economy. you have something of a pulse on independent voters around the country. particularly as it talks about surging gas prices. a lot of independent voters say in polling they will not support obama, particularly because of this issue. this hits them particularly hard. >> number one, it's a long time from now to the election and who knows what gasoline prices will be or what the issues, the debates will be about. i think the president has to show that he understands the pain, that he understands that we need businesses to come here and thrive. he has to give people confidence that he's not going to support policies that will stop job creation, that government can't be the solution to everything. in the end it is the private sector economy that really does give us the hand up rather than the hand out that america needs, skpe

and he's just got to get out there. i've said this a thousand times, he needs more contact with the business community and not just by calling in a thousand well-known business personalities and talking to them around a table and leaving. that doesn't get things done. it's small business that's going to create the jobs, it is people's confidence that will get them to buy a car so that general motors will go hire more people. it is an intelligent tax policy that people not only can understand, and it doesn't cost them a fortune just to fill out the forms, but a tax policy they think is going to be consistent going forward. unless you know that government is going to have labor policies taxed, policies regulations that are predictable and consistent, businesses can't adapt and plan for the future and make the kind of investments. we have banks with a lot of money. they're scared to make loans. why? because every time they turn around, they get attacked. now, whether they should or shouldn't get attacked is not the issue here. the issue is it does not leave them, when they go back home and sit around the table and say, what are we going to do?

well, you know, everybody is after us, let's not run any risks. in fact, we want banks to take the risks. we vilified banks for giving mortgages, but that's what we want them to do. we want them to take risks. unless they do that, nobody will get anywhere. >> the governor sounds pessimistic that the president should be up for reelections. >> the president is a great campaigner. we'll have great candidates. we have three or four in already. i think we'll probably have two or three more. >> you'd like to see a governor. >> i'd like to see a governor because governors can balance the budget, they've got to be decisive, they can't make excuses, they've got to lead. >> we had a governor the previous eight years and we started with record surpluses and we ended up with record deficits. >> being a governor is no guarantee of anything.

>> no. but that's what we need right now is decisiveness and getting confidence back into the economy. i think the mayor is right, to some degree we've had attacking wall street and business in this white house. we need pro growth, pro economic policies, we need to keep taxes in check and have to have the fortitude to cut spending and that's what i think a governor will bring to the table. i think we've got some good candidates, they'll get stronger, and for the crucible of these debates, i think you'll see good candidates. >> david, i have two questions for you in our remaining moments. the first has to do with campaign financing. a new expenditure group called 527 started by bill burden who worked in the press shop at the white house. back in 2007, then-candidate obama was critical, decried all of these independent expenditures. it's thought that he might spend a billion dollars on his reelection campaign. >> that's a speculative number. >> is president obama ultimately going to represent the death of campaign finance reform in this country after being a champion

for -- >> this independent group that was performed was formed in response to the ones that spent hundreds of millions of dollars in the lars campaign to defeat democratic candidates with lanch contributions. we tried to pass a law that would force all groups to disclose who was giving them the money so the public could see. it got 59 democratic votes in the united states and 41 republicans blocked it. so of course, now there is a reaction to it because the democrats are saying, we can't play with two sets of rules. the governor and i should walk down to capitol hill, urge them to pass the law and then people will see -- >> democrats have a huge financial advantage going into 2012, do they not? >> i don't know because the campaign is just begun. we won't have a huge financial advantage if people like the coke brothers who funded tens of billions of dollars to these organizations, carl rove and his

group and others spend up to billions of dollars they say they're going to spend. we don't really know who is going to spend what. i don't think this is healthy, yorng iti don't think it's good, but it's the system we have and you can't expect one side to operate under one set of rules and the other side to operate under another. >> what if iraq says they want troops to stay beyond the predicted date. is that something president obama will do? >> i want to be careful, i don't want to misrepresent, but the president feels strongly that our mission needs to be wrapped up in iraq. i've seen no change in that. >> he wants to keep that promise and not have it go beyond? >> yes. >> i'm going to leave it there. thanks to all of and you the debate will continue on all fronts. coming up, how will the tea party influence 2012 and what habits impact on this congress? plus, budget battles, raising the debt limits and america's role in the mideast.

we'll talk live to senator of florida, mark arubio. plus, a break from the seriousness of the week because sometimes you just got to laugh. inside political comedy and its role in politics. from the host of last night's correspondents dinner, head writer for saturday night live, seth meyers. opportunity can start anywhere. and go everywhere. to help revitalize a neighborhood in massachusetts. restore a historic landmark in harlem. fund a local business in chicago. expand green energy initiatives in seattle. because when you're giving, lending, and investing in more communities across the country, more opportunities happen.

coming up, my exclusive interview with a rising star in the republican party, florida senator marco rubio weighs in on 2012, the tea party and the budget battles here in washington, up next after this brief commercial break. i've seen beautiful things.n ] ♪ i've seen the sunrise paint the desert. witnessed snowfall on the first day of spring. ♪ but the most beautiful thing i've ever seen was the image on a screen that helped our doctor see my wife's cancer was treatable. [ male announcer ] ge technologies help doctors detect cancer early so they can save more lives. bringing better health to more people. ♪

but i wasn't winning any ribbons managing my diabetes. it was so complicated. there was a lot of information out there. but it was frustrating trying to get the answers i needed. then my company partnered with unitedhealthcare. they provided onsite screenings, healthy cooking tips. that's a recipe i'm keeping. ( announcer ) turning complex data into easy tools. we're 78,000 people looking out for 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare.

we are back joined now by the freshman senator from florida, republican marco rubio. welcome to the program. >> thanks for having me. >> good to have you here. so much talk about the tea party and the tea party's influence in washington. you were known as a tea party senator and candidate, embraced by the tea party, but you have your independence from the tea party caucus. what has the tea party or the tea party sentiment, what kind of impact has it had on the debates we're having in washington? >> first let's remind ourselves was it was. it was everyday americans tired of the country, often tired of the direction both parties were taking our country, and they wanted people to come up here and change direction. and i think for the first time in quite a while, you're seeing a debate in washington about how much to cut.

in the past, it was about how much to reduce the increases. now there's a real debate about how much to cut and i think that's an important influence and important impact. on the other hand, we need to remind ourselves that our problems are big and they're moving very fast. they're moving faster than perhaps any problems our country's ever faced have moved. i think the real risk is are our problems moving faster than our solutions or our ability to solve them? and that's one of the issues that's overlying all of the debates we've had. >> that's interesting. do you describe yourself as a tea party senator? >> first of all, i don't ever run away from the folks who have supported me who are in the tea party moment. i've never askricribed that to myself because i think the tea party movement is a grassroots movement of a lot of people that's not necessarily all republicans. some independents and some democrats that are not of washington. they want to influence what happens in washington, but ultimately, the principles that i stand on i think are principles that people in the party identify with. >> but there is a thought to the party, don't compromise. you've said you don't think people in washington are serious, i assume republicans and democrats, about really

taking on the toughest challenges we face. as you think about yourself, are you here to leggeislate? are you here to compromise? >> compromise shouldn't be a dirty word. in washington, compromise seems to be a deal and that's what it's meant to people over the last 20 years, a deal that's meant to be a solution but doesn't solve anything. i think the compromise is between two folks with the same goal but different ideas of how to do it. that's not a negative thing. >> you voted against the compromise boujt deal in the lame duck session. you apparently didn't think that was a good deal, that that was a fair compromise. did the republican leadership fail here? >> first of all, i respect the work that speaker boehner put in. he was in a tough spot. let's remind ourselves of the last election cycle and what it was about. we were dealing with major issues in our country, big issues that deserve big solutions. now, people like me, who were elected in the wave of 2010 to make a difference, if we don't stand up and say that, who is going to stand up and say that? if folks like me elected in 2010 don't come here and say these

big issues, these big problems deserve big solutions, no one's going to say that. >> right, but you still have to compromise. i mean, you say he was in a tough spot. he's in a tough spot because you either have the votes or you don't. so, you send a statement or you compromise and get things done. which is what senator rubio believes in? >> well, i think you want to have a compromise. a compromise better do something. my problem is the problems have to be solved. to say we compromised for the same of compromised, that may get you short-term likes in the media, but long-term, it doesn't solve anybody. we need solutions. >> you have a debate over raising the debt ceiling, the limit on america's credit card. you said no, i won't vote to raise the debt ceiling unless we talk about serious cuts and reforms in entitlement spending. the president said this would be a catastrophe and this is irresponsible. this is what he said this week. >> the idea that the united states would take the risk, people start to believe we won't pay our bills is a ridiculous proposition, irresponsible, completely unacceptable risk for

us to take. >> is it irresponsible for you to krr through to the voters? >> it's irresponsible to continue to borrow trillions a year with no plan to end it. i marvel how people in this town run around with their hair on fire because of the potential of a technical default over not raising the debt limit, but they're not concerned about not paying our debt obligations because we don't have the money. my point is we know this is a problem. let's start dealing with it now. let's use the debt limit debate as an opportunity to begin to put in place a plan and execute a plan that gains the confidence of the world. >> but the treasury secretary says let's talk about it, work on parallel tracks. the tea party's got everybody talking about spending, but if you can't reach agreements on social security reform, medicare reform, other specific cuts, do you then take the next step and say we're going to -- >> first of all, there is no magic bullet. in essence, you can't solve this debt problem america faces with one solution. there's not a magic bullet.

a series of reforms have to happen. what i'm saying and what i think others are beginning to think, including many in the democrat party, is now as part of the debt limit debate, let's not just talk about the debt limit, let's talk about how we're going to put this country on a fiscal path -- >> all right, one of the ways to do that, as you well know, chairman paul ryan of the budget committee said we have to change medicare as we know it, premium support or a voucher system, but it's going to change. okay, are you prepared to vote to support the ryan plan? >> medicare as we know it becomes bankrupt, so you can't sustain it the way it is. between the next 5 and 12 years, medicare as we know it will go bankrupt, and all of the people out there attacking the ryan plan, where is your plan? introduce your plan. because if your plan is to keep medicare the way it is, then that's bankruptcy and it doesn't work for anybody. number two, i will support any plan that saves medicare, doesn't impact current seniors or hurt economic growth. if the ryan plan does that, if people don't like the ryan plan,

introduce your own plan. >> you'll vote for the plan? >> i'll vote for any plan that saves medicare, doesn't hurt seniors and doesn't hurt economic growth. if someone has a better idea on how to do that, they should propose -- >> you can't assert that it saves medicare when there's so much uncertainty about it, and it certainly dismantles the way medicare operates. and you have said recently you don't want to dismantle a program like medicare or social security that your own mother relies upon. >> that's right. >> look at some of the reaction in terms of how people feel about cutting spending for medicare. we'll put it on the screen. cutting medicare spending -- 78% oppose. medicare spending -- 69% oppose. you're not operating in a political vacuum here. you well know that. you are a senator from florida with a lot of older voters. are you prepared to stand up to them and say, sorry, folks, we've got to do this? because a lot of republicans think this is handing something to the democrats that will be potent against republicans. >> the ryan plan increases funding to it and the only people that are voting to cut

medicare supported obamacare, which cut trillions out of medicare and is usi it to fund a science experiment somewhere outside of medicare. the only people who voted to cut medicare spending are the people who voted in favor of obama care. that's a fact. the truth is -- >> but you don't deny, if you introduce a voucher system into medicare, that there is going to be a set amount of dollars seniors have to go into the private marketplace. that is not medicare as we now have it? >> well, medicare as we now have it goes bankrupt. it's not an option. here's my challenge today -- anybody out there who thinks there is a better way to save medicare should introduce a bill on monday. tomorrow, when we get back to work here in washington, run up to capitol hill and introduce your bill. why hasn't the president proposed a medicare plan? why hasn't the congressional democrats proposed a medicare plan? why haven't the leaders in the senate who control the senate -- they haven't even proposed a budget, much less a medicare plan. what is their plan to save a program that's going to go bankrupt in 5 to 12 years? don't just criticize, propose. otherwise, you're not serious. you're playing political games. >> you've been here for a matter of months in washington, so you

have a fresher perspective. what is your assessment of the president's leadership? >> well, i think unfortunately, the president has failed to lead. and i say this with sadness. let me tell you something, i'm a republican, i'm proud to be a republican, but i love my country even more. i desperately want america for the next 100 years to be what it's been for the last, an exceptional country in many ways, socially, politically, economically. america has been unique and special. i want it to continue to be that way. it cannot unless the president leads. i want the president to lead. i want the president to lead. we can't solve this medicare issue, we can't keep it from going bankrupt if the president doesn't lead. we can't put our country on a sustainable path of spending if the president doesn't lead. we can't play america's proper role in the world if the president doesn't lead. i want him to lead. americans want him to lead. ultimately, i'd rather him lead than just hope that my party succeeds, but he's not leading and we're going to pay a tremendous price for that. >> do you think he's beatable in 2012? >> well, i think he has to lead. if he doesn't, i think he should be replaced. >> but the question is he beatable in 2012? >> sure. anybody's beatable in american

politics. i learned that myself. >> what about your political future? you said no run in 2012. people in your party are depending on you. if your party comes to you and says look, you can focus on florida, but in the fall of next year, we need you on the ticket to carry florida. are you saying there's no way you'll consider it? >> i won't consider it. i don't want to be the vice president of the united states. i want to be a senator. i want to be the senator from florida. i think i can have an impact on the issues we're facing. i'm saddened that americans are so pessimistic about the future. they shouldn't be. there's nothing wrong with the american people. we are the same people that built the greatest society in all of human history. we just need some government policies that allow the american people to once again do that. >> so, under no circumstances would you serve on a ticket in 2012? >> no. i'm not going to be on a ticket in 2012. >> under no circumstances? >> under no circumstances. >> what about donald trump? is he a serious candidate? >> well, you give him a lot of attention, so yes, he is. >> is he a true conservative? >> i don't know much about donald trump's politics. i know you have to ask that, but i'm more concerned about the

issues happening here on planet earth, and back here on this planet, we're facing the issues that our country owes $15 trillion. our debt is larger than our economy, almost about to be larger than our entire economy, with no plan in sight to reverse course on that. around the world is the most dangerous as it's been in a long time. there are people as we speak planning to attack american interests at home and abroad. these issues have to be dealt with. if we deal with them, the next century can be an american country as well, but we can deal with them and the president has to lead. >> quickly on american policy. you've thought a lot about u.s. policy. there are reports that gadhafi's son and grandchildren were killed by a nato attack. will this push him from power, in your view? >> well, i hope the libyan people will push him from power. i think the united states and nato and the international community have a role to play in that and he must be removed from power. for saddam hussein -- i'm sorry, for moammar gadhafi to hold on to power in libya would be the worst possible scenario i can imagine. he would be emboldened to act against our interests. he would create a blueprint for others in the region to act as

he has. >> you would target him specifically? >> well, he hides behind civilians to shield himself. unfortunately, if he's involved in military operations and military installations and command centers, he's going to find himself in the line of fire. i think the best thing gadhafi can do is leave libya. >> we'll leave it there. senator rubio, thank you for your time this morning. up next -- >> look at the options republicans are kicking around, palin, gingrich, trump. that doesn't sound like a field of candidates. that sounds like season 13 of "dancing with the stars." >> inside political comedy and its role in politics in our elections from the host of the correspondents dinner, head writer for "saturday night live," seth meyers. [ male announcer ] your hard work has paid off.

and you want to pass along as much as possible to future generations. at northern trust, we know what works and what doesn't. as one of the nation's largest wealth managers, we can help you manage the complexities of transferring wealth. seeking to minimize taxes while helping maximize what's passed along. because you just never know

how big those future generations might be. ♪ expertise matters. find it at northern trust. two of the most important are energy security and economic growth. north america actually has one of the largest oil reserves in the world. a large part of that is oil sands. this resource has the ability to create hundreds of thousands of jobs. at our kearl project in canada, we'll be able to produce these oil sands with the same emissions as many other oils and that's a huge breakthrough. that's good for our country's energy security and our economy.

and we are back. last night, the white house correspondents association hosted its annual dinner at the hilton here in washington, where president obama spoke, and he took the opportunity to take some real jabs at his most vocal critics. >> and then, there is a vicious

rumor floating around that i think could really hurt mitt romney. i heard he passed universal health care when he was governor of massachusetts. someone should get to the bottom of that, and i know just the guy to do it, donald trump! is here tonight. now, i know thathe's taken some flack lately, but no one is happier, no one is prouder to put this birth certificate matter to rest than the donald. and that's because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter, like did we fake the moon landing? >> silence there. on saturday, i sat down with the featured entertainer at the dinner, the head writer from "saturday night live," seth meyers. we talked about how he prepared for his hosting duties last

night and the role of political comedy. seth meyers, welcome to "meet the press." >> it's great to be here! i'm so excited to be on "meet the press" without having to run for office. >> right. >> so much easier this way. >> if you want to declare something, feel free to do that. >> i think i'm mostly just go to run from previous statements and hit some talking points. >> good. >> i've been watching a lot of "meet the press" to prepare for this, so. >> actually, it's appropriate we're at the white house. >> yes. >> you and your family getting a tour here, which is always nice to see the people's house. >> yep. >> and of course, you are the star attraction because i picked up "politico" here, and here it is, "snl comes to washington," as you're presiding over it. >> yes, very exciting. >> this is, this dinner -- and i'm talking to you before you're doing it here on friday -- this is a tough thing to prepare for. >> it's very hard to prepare for, but it's fun to prepare for as well, you know. it's exciting to be able to tell jokes that, you know, i feel like everybody here will get, and maybe the rest of the country won't. i mean, it's obviously a very wonky room.

not a strong field. and who knows if they can beat you in 2012? but i'll tell you who could definitely beat you, mr. president, 2008 barack obama. you would have loved him. >> you're sitting around your office as you're all getting ready for the show, and a week like this happens. >> right. >> where you have this split-screen effect. the president releasing his birth certificate, donald trump announcing that he's proud of himself. >> right. >> and on cable television. do you just fall off your chair and say could they have made this any better for us? >> i was very excited. when you do stuff like this, in a lot of ways, it's about the year in politics, but i feel like the closer the news is to the actual day, the better, and obviously, this is an exciting time to be doing the show. >> so, we both do weekly news programs. >> yes. >> and you, of course, you talk a lot about politics. >> right. >> as i mentioned, talking about donald trump. so, where do you get your

material? >> well, i mean, i think donald trump sort of brings it with a bow on it and leaves it at the front door, but you sort of follow, watch the news, and you know, spend a lot of time on the internet. for us, "weekend update," it's easier if it's a story that our audience is familiar with. we don't educate very well on our show, but if it's a big story, i feel like we can analyze it pretty well. >> but it's interesting, you spend a lot of time sort of insisting that you're topical, right? >> yes. >> you want to be relevant. >> i insist it constantly. say it right before bed and first thing when i wake up. >> "saturday night live" has been doing fake news long before it was cool to do fake news. >> how dare you? how dare you call it fake? >> is part of the motivation that you have an agenda, that you feel like you can really influence? >> i don't think you ever -- as a comedian, i don't think you aim to influence. but it's really nice when people think you're influential. so, it's a nice side effect, but i don't think -- i mean, i think our first goal is always just to be funny. >> so, what is your impression

of politicians generally, especially those who participate on the program? you had some impressions working with then candidate obama before you will skewer him while sitting on stage at the white house correspondents dinner. >> obama is great. he was really charismatic, he was great on our show. it's been intimidating to watch old correspondents dinners and see how hard he kills. he's very good at telling jokes. >> and when he was on the show, there was that bit, a halloween show, where with the halloween mask. >> right. and he took off his halloween mask and revealed that he was then candidate obama. so i guess we were really influential. i don't think anybody thought he was going to win and now he's president. >> so, you dressed as yourself? >> well, you know, hillary, i have nothing to hide. i enjoy being myself. i'm not going to change who i am just because it's halloween. live from new york, it's saturday night! >> he struck you as funny? >> he struck me as very funny. i remember going to his room, his dressing room beforehand to run over some lines with him, and i mentioned that i grew up

in new hampshire and he jumped right out of his chair to shake my hand, which i, as i primary state, like he appreciated. >> like you understood where he was coming from. >> yes, yes, yeah. >> tina fey. you've done something on "saturday night live" i haven't been able to do, get sarah palin to appear on the program. and you had a very positive experience with her. >> well, i mean, she was a great sport. that was a crazy time. you know, that was the month before the election, and she came on and was really funny in a sketch, and then i think one of the probably best things i've ever been next to in my time at "saturday night live" was watching her do the sarah palin rap and i got to jam out and dance with sarah palin, so what's better than that? ♪ my name is sarah palin, you all know me, vice president nominee of the gop ♪ ♪ gonna need your votes in the next election, can i get a whoop, whoop from the senior section ♪ ♪ put your hands up >> she got the joke and she was okay with it? >> she did. she did. i wouldn't say that i don't think she trusted us 100%, but

you know, i think she knew that we were good sports and she wasn't turned off. >> didn't think comedians in new york city would be -- >> she put a toe in first. she entered every room toe first, yes. >> all right, is there a difference between how republicans and democrats come to play on "saturday night live"? >> i have to say, i think republicans are just so happy to be, like sort of invited to the party? john mccain's been one of the most fun people we've had on the show and he's always been an excellent sport. >> right. >> and i think probably the sarah palin sketch i'll remember the most is when, you know, he came on as himself and tina fey played sarah palin and they did a qvc sketch together. >> good evening, my fellow americans. i'm john mccain. >> and, you know, i'm just sarah palin. okay, listen up, everybody, i'm going rogue right now, so keep your voices down. available now, we've got a bunch of these t-shirts -- >> you look at this republican field. you know, you look at some of the polling, and there's not a

lot of excitement -- >> no. >> -- about the republicans who are going to challenge president obama. does that worry you? >> no. it's excellent so far. this field is excellent for us. >> why is that? >> this is a really good field for impressions and comedies, and i already can't wait for the first republican debate. i know they have to get enough to actually hold a debate, but i think it will be really good for us. >> do you lay awake night after praying that you're topical and relevant that donald trump is a candidate? >> i would love it. if donald ran for president, it would be the greatest thing for us. it would not be good for anyone else, but it would be excellent for us and i'd be selfishly willing to take that. >> seth meyers, thank you very much. good to have you on the program. >> you bet. >> we'll be right back. [ male announcer ] myron needed an mba to turn his technology into a business.

so he chose a university where the faculty average over 14 years of experience in their fields to help him turn a thesis into a business plan and accelerate the path between ideas... and actions. my name is myron sullivan, i'm developing a robotic system to clean oil spills,

and i am a phoenix. [ male announcer ] learn more about the school of business at phoenix.edu. lord of the carry-on. sovereign of the security line. you never take an upgrade for granted. and you rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle. and go. you can even take a full-size or above. and still pay the mid-size price. i deserve this. [ male announcer ] you do, business pro. you do. go national. go like a pro. that is all for today. visit "press pass," our press pass blog, for a wrap-up of today's program and updates from me throughout the week. it's presspass.msnbc.com. we will be back next week. if it's sunday, it's "meet the press." ♪

♪ [ male announcer ] doctors have been saying it forever. let's take a look. but they've never actually been able to do it like this. let's take a look. v-scan from ge healthcare. a pocket sized imaging device that will help change the way doctors see patients. that's better health for more people. ears? that will help change the way doctors see patients. aside from laser guns and time travel, the first plastic water bottle ever made

will finally decompose. so reuse. recycle. you can save the future... the more you know. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com