for example, the paris agreement is one big compromise and that is what we are constantly referring backhe 1.5—degree target, we don't have time for the small steps in the right direction, we don't have time to reach net zero 2050, which is a big compromise. when it comes to the climate emergency, winning slowly is the same thing as losing. we can't really compromise with the laws of physics and that's kind of the idea. either we go on as a civilisation, or we don't. "build back better, blah, blah, blah." "green economy, blah, blah, blah." "net zero by 2050, blah, blah, blah." "net—zero, blah, blah, blah." "climate—neutral, blah, blah, blah." there are people who say, looking at what you've done over the past four years, that one of the dangers of your approach to politics is you create a cynicism about politicians. glad you are laughing because not what the politicians are laughing. i mean, people say that, "the thing about greta thunberg "is that she makes people think that all politicians "are rubbish, useless, blah, blah, blah." yeah. what do you say to that? one third of our anthrop

world's biggest financiers of fossil fuel companies providing $111 billion of debt since the paris agreement. pfizer signed an agreement to sell its antiviral drug paxlovid in china through a state-owned company. do y'all -- the deal with the group is effective immediately with terms not disclosed. covid infections are surging across the country as authorities make a rapid about-face in their strict covid zero policy. >> we continue to see resilience in emerging market currencies after we had two sessions of gains and despite the downside we saw in risk assets. following the fed's rate decision and the hawkish downshift. we continue to see the drop in volatility in emerging market currencies. when you follow the jp morgan measure of implied volatility for em currencies, now at a 10 month slope. the market opens in seoul and tokyo are next. this is bloomberg. it's official, america. xfinity mobile is the fastest mobile service. and gives you unmatched savings with the best price for two lines of unlimited. only $30 a line per month. that means you could save hundreds a year over t-mobile, at&

that will allow the united states to reduce carbon emissions and meet its obligations under the paris agreementfinance a 15% corporate tax for companies with revenues of more than billion dollars a year, the united states will continue to introduce low-carbon and carbon-free energy sources to develop nuclear power, but democrats consider the main achievement in the world. in the health care industry, physician-insurance holders can get a discount on expensive prescription drugs. in the event that the manufacturer does not want to reduce the price, they will keep up to 95% of the income from sales of this drug, the measures begin to work in january, but for the europeans. they cause confusion. they fear the law could lead to unfair competition, market closures and the disruption of critical supply chains that have just passed the pandemic test. these are the words of the head of the european commission, the usulu fund, and the head of the trade committee of the european parliament, generally called for complaining about the us to the wto. there are important and often decisive advantages over lo

so how do you balance the global goals, like the paris agreement and limiting global warming with geo political needs and europe growing demand for gas? what is laughable because we are back to using the or the factory that produce cold and we back to the nuclear energy we back to the dirty energy that we said we putting on the side. and we have worked for the last decade on clean energy, and suddenly we decide to spoil the planet to spoil the air that we are breathing to go against. every principle that we said, we believe in, just because we want to impose sanctions on our sentence and russia and in politics, politics and is not always meaningful. and it is most of the time damaging, but not as damaging as we are closing today. so we no longer looking at the atmosphere, we no longer looking at the global warning. we no longer looking at the clean energy and nothing of all that. we buying the liquid guys we establishing new time . and there's because we don't have that, we're going back to call 3800 factory that are back now to produce energy when they were shut down more than 10 yea

government's 2 accounts ah, and the stakes has never been higher. meeting the targets ratified by the paris agreement in 2015, a 45 percent reduction in emissions by 2030 and net 0 by 2015 seam ever further away. the consequences of dangerous crime change will be such that nobody can escape and that it will be the largest human rights violation that we've ever witnessed in the world for eternity. because there's no way back once we reach certain different points. so down the question arises, what does this mean for private entities like oil, gas and gold companies, ah, act of his say, just $100.00 companies are responsible for 71 percent of global emissions. the life threatening impacts of f, a higher greenhouse gas levels are now being felt on every continent. and yet, emissions continue to rise as does public frustration and anger at corporate inaction around the world. that the law enable citizens to force companies to change. oh, on the 5th of april, 2019 in the hague headquarters of the energy major shell were unusually lively awe. representatives of 7 organizations, including 1000000 to fancy t

for example, the, the paris agreement in 2015, which focused on climate talks, these commitments are not always honored. i mean, really big promises were made in terms of global warming and, and parents at that point on the way things are going right now. we're not honoring them. so with this deal we also got to see, okay, we made the promises, but are we going to walk the walk? you mentioned the, the climate shot negotiations that are been going on. we've says in seeing those, there's agreements broken. how does this deal on biodiversity plug in to the whole notion of climate change because they are, of course closely related. exactly. experts are saying that they're completely inter length and that to fight climate change. we also got to protect our biodiversity, especially ecosystems, as such as for us. so to come back to my example of the amazon, the, this like massive rain forest is absolutely crucial to absorb carbon from the atmosphere because this keeps the atmosphere from heating up. so the more we deforest, the more we threaten our climate also, and similarly for us to prot

because we've seen in the past that we've made historic deals before, like the paris agreement in 2015. which in to tackle claim change. what was now very important goals on climate, on global warming, and the way we're going right now, we're not really on track to meet those goals. is there the hope then that this will spill over if countries walk the walk as you say, will protecting by diversity if it happens that way, also protect the fight against climate change. it's definitely a very important component because protecting or bio diversity and fighting climate change are completely interlinked, especially when it comes to protecting ecosystems. like for us, going back to the example of the amazon, this massive rain forest plays an important very important role in absorbing carbon from the atmosphere. and that keeps the atmosphere from heating up so much. so the more we deforest, the more we threaten our climate and also vice versa. if we pollutes and emit that, also very bad for biodiversity. of course, such a big mom a great to have you here to talk about it. they doubly reported

agreement. there are a lot of comparisons to t paris climate agreement. agreement is to climate -- similar to how we were looking at -- how we see that paris climate agreement to biodiversity. think of what is really happening on our mother earth, we think of the climate csis, would we think of the mass extinction crisis we are facing mother earth, we are in multiple crises -- i don't need to name them all, but this is in advance, yes, and she mentioned, it is -- it acknowledges indigenous people and that is advance inomparison to wt we would see in past years. it is better than nothing. it is a framework for looking at this as a framework for biodiversity and how we can move forward to avoid further extinction and further harm to biodiversity. yet there still a long way to go. the aim, we look at target 3, the aim is 30 by 30. that means protecting 30% of land, water, resources by 2030. and that is what the majority -- that is what the agreement calls for, one of the key elements of the agreement. however, there are others were calling for 50 by 2030. so

fed into the conversation and then the strategies could assist with the efforts to reach the paris agreementne.5 degrees celsius target. so whatar you make of international regimes like these? so environmental technologies affect co2 emissions. and whether it is worth the cost so how can these sorts of approaches and with the paris climate accord and then to put out atw report basically saying we are nowhere close to meeting the 2-degree target let alone one.five. so countries have promised little is actually implementation but on washington state our governor and then to see a climate later that co2 emissions have been going effort we have to recognize that there's a lot of false promise and hope because of the history is they don't do it very well that we do it f because they don't think there is an alternative. >> as of yet then you talk about how he take cars off the road see that yes.hi so there are a lot of cool things we can apply technology and that is a great one. there is a cool company called pandemonium that is in canada is macro transit on demand. so rather than the normal trans

fundamental, theses, the fundamental provisions of the minsk agreement and the first number in these paris agreementss a ceasefire and disengagement of forces along the entire length of the line of contact. this was agreed upon by everyone when the four leaders sat down at the round table, and we, who were accompanying us, settled down along the perimeter of the elysee palace zelensky was the first thing he said that he would not do this and subscribe to the disengagement of forces along the entire line. he can't connect. and the maximum that he can do is to choose three experimental sites on this line of contact and there we have clarified to try to carry out this breeding. well , the suspicion arose instantly, but they clarified the reason why there is between the consensus of experts and the destruction of this consensus at the level of heads of state. but such a metamorphosis took place, the americans sent him a signal that if you disengage forces along the entire line of contact, then the russians will never donbass will not be given away. well, you see, probably this is logic and you know, as a

another words if you don't support the paris agreement or un deal you are now the grandma killer becausees all new burial and forms of covid and they love that angle.e the next thing that happened with the eye eae and the journal that published doctor fauci, basically they say we need a response to cover on —- covidd response to climate using the same template as covid. so what they are doing according to the ap, "washington post" joe biden is set to declare a national climate emergency the center for biological diversity is very exciteden already touting 130 new presidential powers biden would have extended too mayors and governors. we know from a fewew months ago we know the blueprint from an energy lockdown. on and even days gas stations upon rotatingt days, thermostat controls what you just saw in august under an energy emergency andes colorado. prescribed blackouts. under a climate emergency limiting airline travel. the "washington post" just had an article detailing what the new report global tax on airlines. some flights could be $200 tax going after business travel. are the enoug

in the six years since the paris agreement, the wood's 60 largest banks have financed fossil fuels tone of $4.6 trillion. >> europe's biggest bank takes a major step in the fight against climate change. hsbc says it will no longer fund oil and gas deals that received their final approval after the end of 2021. the decision hailed by climate campaigners. >> large infrastructure projects do not happen without bank financing. for a bank to take a position they will not be funding new oilfield explorations is a big deal. quickly move is in line with with the international energy agency says is necessary for the world to reach net zero emissions by 2050. it comes after years of criticism from activists and major shareholders that the bank has been a key financer of greenhouse gas emissions, providing nearly $55 billion to top fossil fuel producers since the 2016 paris climate accords. hsbc's project-specific limitation is largely symbolic. it affects only around 4% of its financing, funding for existing projects and nonspecific plants will continue. activists, though, say it could lead to

own policy, contrary to thearis agreement which says financing fls should be aligned with the paris agreementsg the tempature below 1.5, and we would argue that it is also incompatible with national law r the guyana government to do this on manyifferent realms. not simply the violation of the right to a healthy environment. amy: let me ask antonia juhasz, could guyana cope with a massive oil spill at the one triggered by the bp deepwater horizon in the gulf of mexico? you wrote the book "like tide: the devastating impact of the gulf will still." it is so interesting to be talking to you both about this now as the people of the united states, to say the least, are experiencing what is being called a climate bomb, a once-in-a-generation cold -- level of cold and snow that has not been experienced here in a long time. >> while melinda wrote incredibly good environmental provisions into guyana's laws and constitution, guyana does not have anything close to the capacity to regulate and oversee deepwater highlight technical offshore drilling. the united states did not have the capacity to do it. we

-paris agreement, you're now a grandma killer because it's going to kill virulent forms. and this is facted the journal cell which published anthony fauci all saying we need the response to covid, the same response-- the response to climate using the same template as covid. and so what they're doing, is they're-- and this is accord to go the associated press, washington post from july article, joe biden is set to declare a national climate emergency. in has groups like the senate for biological diversity excited and touting 130 new war time presidential powers that biden will have. presumably to extend to mayors and governors. we know from the international energy agency report from a few months ago we know the blueprint for what you could call an energy lockdown. they're talking car-free cities, odd-even days, gas stations open, rotating days. they're talking more thermostat controls if we just saw in august in utility companies doing it under an energy emergency in colorado for their aren't. prescribed blackouts under a climate emergency limiting airline travel, "the wa

so in other, if you didn't support the green new deal or the un paris agreement, you were now a grandma killer because this going to create all new virulent forms, covid, and they love that angle. the next thing that happened and this is in fact the international energy agency this has infected british medical. this is in fact the new england journal medicine. this has infected the journal cell which published anthony fauci. they're all basically saying that we need a response to covid the same response at the using response to climate using the template as covid. and so what they're doing is and this is according to the associated washington post from july article, joe biden is set to declare a national climate emergency. this groups like the center for biological diversity very excited. they're already touting 130 new war time presidential powers that biden will have presumably to extend to mayors, governors. we know from the international energy agency report of a few months ago that we know the blueprint for what you could call an energy lockdown. they're talking about car free citi

follinthe un paris agreement, they said this in 2013, a top u.n. official sttg down the whole economy. how prescient? how did they know seven years bere it go? here's where it gets rll creepy. november 2019, the un demanded a 7% annual cut in carbon dioxide just months bere covid lockdowns. 2019 november. we need 7% cut actual headlines next presto. by december 20, the un got exact what it called for actual headline emissions fall 7% because of covid lockdowns. they called for it. they asked for it. it happened. they got it next. and now what do they want? oh, my gosh. now they demand lockdown. a mission. this is actual headline uk guardian a global lockdown every two years to meet pis goals. that's a study. this is what's happening in academia. our peer reviewed journals and our corporate media. this it. we need it every two years at least they're not saying every year. they're giving you a year reprieve, a lockdown. next, covid could covid lockdown have helped save the planet? this is corporate media all excited how great the lockdowns were. natu

and she asks if have any ideas about how your strategy could assist with efforts to reach the paris agreements 1.5 degrees celsius target follow on question which we can. so what do you make of international regimes like these now? so let's start with the the easier one. how can nimble nimble technologies affect co2 emissions? so i will set aside the 1.5 degree target because people have big fights over that and whether it's worth the cost. so i will just address the question of how can these of approaches, you know, reduce co2 emissions rapidly and effectively. the first thing, though, i think, is is that there is an assumption in these questions that the paris climate accord and other things like are effective. and i find that simply not to be the case, the u.n. actually put out a report recently basically saying that we are nowhere close to meeting the two degree target, let alone the 1.5 degree target. so, you know, countries promised that we're going to meet these goals. many of them don't even have plans that are that can meet those goals, let alone the actual implementation. here in was

if, if you have any ideas about how your strategies could assist with efforts to reachgr the paris agreement 1.5 degrees celsius target? follow-on question which we can explore, what do you make of international regimes like these? >> now -- >> let's start with the easier one. how can nimble environmental technologies affect co2 emissions? >> i will set aside 1.5° target because people have big fights over that and whether it's worth the cost comes i will just address the question of how good these sorts of approaches, you know, reduce co2 emissions rapidly and effectively. the first thing though i think is that there is an assumption in these questions that the paris climate accord another things like that are effective. i find that simply not to be the case. the u.n.. actually put out a report recently basically saying we're nowhere closehe to beating the 2° target let alone the 1.5-degree target. two countries have promised we would meet these goals. many of them don't even have plans that can meet those goals let alone the actual application. here in washington state our governor has bee

the entire goal of the paris 2015 agreement was to not increase global temperature by more than 5 degreescentigrade over time. there is a timeline. we don't have another 40 or 50 years to work on this to get it right. we really need to stop global warming as soon as possible, and i think the only way to move that forward is to get off carbon and that is why wind and solar continues to be very important. a lot of critics of fusion are saying if we invested as much in these alternative technologies we would see a lot of progress there and that we really do need to keep our eyes on that, as well. >> all right, thank you so much. before i let you go -- this is a different topic, but since you are up there in lake tahoe? how is the snow? how is the energy up there, what are you seeing? >> it's a lot of buzz. people are pretty stoked, to use the ski expression. conditions are pretty lovely. not a lot of snow in the near term forecast but the resorts are doing really well at maintaining the big coverage we have. >> all right, lisa krieger with the mercury news. thank you for being with us. >> th

turns out that you can use more ancient technologies and forget about the principles of the paris climate agreementour partners from unfriendly countries , we and nadeli show that our statement does not differ in words. here are our words and deeds russian do not diverge among themselves. we promised to launch a system, including a regulatory one, and a monitoring system to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. we're on that course, we're not deviating from it, we're, uh, very softly approaching. uh, today uh, together with industrialists and entrepreneurs, and to the topic of emission quotas. you know that you decided to test such a system only in one russian region in the sakhalin region. let's see how it works. there and we will move on well, that this is the sakhalin region, because how are you right in question was noted. we have friendly countries, including china, and with whom we have established once again in the framework of the last climate conference, that we think to rush in this in the same way. the question does not need hmm so as not to ruin the owners of our own industrialists and entre

states out of the world organization, health care took time of course, in the 17th year of the paris climate agreement, nato almost did not appear, which is why the former national security adviser wrote in his memoirs that it was literally sure that there was a sign announcing the withdrawal of the united states. that is, this absolutely isolationist tendency is not new, by the way. this is exactly what happened in the 1930s and at the beginning of the second world war, the former combined tripod was very strong. this is what the ultra-right movement, which was actually supported in rural germany, which advocated that it was necessary maintain good relations with nazi germany. this lasted until the japanese attack on the hairdresser on december 7, 1941. after that, this morning, the right-wing movement of the news is simply not one of them, but it ceased to exist and the same thing is happening, and now there is such an ultra-right movement, it is not makes up the majority of it. it has its own influence, and therefore, to overcome its cycles, well , we will have to meet next year, better with regard

that trump took health care somewhere out of the world organization, took it out during the paris climate agreement course, in the 17th year, he almost didn't take it out of nato, why bolton, a former adviser from of national security wrote in his memoirs that it was literally sure that there would be a sign announcing the withdrawal of the united states. this is such an absolute isolationist tendency, by the way, it is not new. it also happened in the 1930s and at the beginning of world war ii. the former joint tripod was very strong. that the far-right movement that actually supported nazi germany, that advocated maintaining good relations with nazi germany, and that continued until the japanese attack on the hairdresser on december 7, 1941 after that this morning, the right-wing movement for exchange, it simply did not disappear, but it ceased to exist and the same thing is happening, and now there is such a far-right movement , it does not make up the majority of it. it has its own influences, and that is why, in order to overcome its cycles, it will have to grow next year regarding aid to ukra

neither is covered by either the paris climate agreement or the emissions trading scheme. most goods are delivered according to the just in time system. in other words, they are produced only when needed in order to avoid storage time. only when transport runs absolutely smoothly can the european economy function. the pandemic in the war, and ukraine have shown us how interwoven and fragile the supply and production processes are. and how helpless we are when they're interrupted. shipping is followed by the next important link in the transportation chain trucks. even coal, if is a truck driver, he loves his job. his home is in bulgaria. is a short video girl. love bower and bowl that blows cheap, but it's vulnerable 15. it will, you know, to started with my grandmother. go dressed herself with her brother, god rest. his soul was also a truck driver 25 or 30 years ago. when he gets lost, you must, you are going. he came home. he always brought our children something like it, the dishes. we were 246 i grandkids. he always had a whole bag of candy for us. walk one time, let m