references to the law. this system of laws failed kate. this is more than an academic state department's decision about prosecution, political pandering to voting or supremacy clause or common dearing cause. this is life and death. the are criminals motivated by malice and a conscious disregard for the lives of others and there are cities more interested in providing a sanctuary for criminals than law-abiding sit sit -- citizens. i have listened to the debate over immigration. you don't hear witnesses on the other side talking about background checks or enforcement mechanisms. but you hear phrases repeated with catatonic frequency as if repetition makes it true somehow. you hear functional control over the border by witnesses who are uniquely well positioned to know better. citizenship for 11 million undocumented aspiring americans as if 11 million of any category could pass a background check. you hear arguments against empowering the assistance of federal authorities. we trust state and local law enforcem

the reason for that is not only this law and the influence of this law, but specifically the fact the her negro voter registration to a point where it would be suicidal to try to cancel out a vote that strong. the present governor, was not regarded as especially liberal in this area when he was elected. even so, he made a point already , realizing this basic fact of political life, he made a point to do certain things no other governor was willing to do in our state. this is real progress. i do not think in the south we will have many elections in which there will be an open issue of antagonism against negroes expressed. >> governor collins's state had one of the highest percentages of negro registration, second to texas. >> important to all of this is the wisdom the negro uses in the exercise of the ballot. many organizations, such as the naacp, the urban, and other groups, international election put on an important campaign across the country to raise the participation of negro voters everywhere. this participation nationally of the negro in the path election will serve the future w

chai is also a professor of law at the law center. at the law center she founded the federal administration and law clinic the national disability rights network and the lounge center for mental health law. she also founded and codirected -- workplace possibility. a place focused on finding common ground. as legislative council for the american civil liberties union from 1988-1991, chai played a leading role in the groundbreaking disabilities act of 1990 and i had an opportunity to work with chai in my role as the president of the leadership conference as we worked to get the americans with disability act amendments and 2008 which overturned supreme court decisions that had reduced protections for certain people with disabilities. those who were originally intended to be covered by the ada. in addition chai helped to draft the employment nondiscrimination act, i bill that would prohibit employment destroyed nation based on sexual orientation and gender identity. neither john nor i could think of a better person to be tonight's lecture

that immigration laws are any more complexion than eye criminal laws. why are your officers not able to work for immigration enforce. >> my understanding for individuals to be credentials required three weeks of training. that's a substantial mittment -- commitment for training of police officers. can't thing of any agency that coot spend that amount of time with personnel in train. the training requirements now being proposed through the state of ohio, there's a number of task forces established that presidential task force that are once again emphasizing the need for additional training for law enforcement i can tell you training time is an absolute premium, particularly for -- specifically as it relates to critical staffing levels holm do we spend time training police officers and i just talking to those who are in this area. the law is constantly changing. so three weeks of training is only valuable as long as the laws don't change. >> thank you, i yield back my time. >> the gentle lady from california. >> thank you. mr. chairman, first i appreciate

if we are violating the law name the law we are violating. we are not violating any law. you just don't like the policy. don't take the donald trump bait. don't punish others for the crime of someone else. in our country, you go after the person who is criminally liable. go after that individual. and lock them up forever. but don't tell the police in los angeles or in manchester or in knoxville tennessee, and all the other cities that are trying to have a working relationship between their police and their growing immigrant communities that they will be able to collaborate so we can go after the criminals. because that's what you're doing. you're taking money away from l.a., even though this crime did not happen in my city. and you're telling my police department and the men and women in uniform in l.a. that they will have fewer officers on either side because you're going to take money away, because you don't like that some guy committed a criminal act he killed someone, he should be punished for it, but we had nothing to do with it. go after the folks that are accountab

sentencing laws are sticky. once you seat high laws in practice they come down more slowly than they arise. that is true as urban neighbourhoods were less scary. and remained so high rates of long-term incarcerations in many communities, it starred to be less true when more and more cash-strapped states started to take the steadily climbing cost of imprisonment seriously, especially as more members start to enter their most expensive years of care. what do you know? it's easier to think clearly about equal justice under law when there's serious dough on the table. if politicians are not scrambling like bidders at an auction, it may not be important how they got there. i'm ray suarez that's the nds story -- "inside story". >>> cheers in aiden as exiled leaders loyal to abd-rabbu mansour hadi return to the recaptured yemeni city >>> hello, welcome to al jazeera, live from our headquarters in doha. i'm elizabeth puranam. also ahead - four u.s. marines are shot dead in the state of ten. tennessee. >> pressure from i

law. denying funding them is one strong message to sanctuary cities. over 300 now in the united states that they're doing the wrong thing and needlessly endangering or losing the lives of kate steinle from illegal immigrants. i urge passage and ask the senate take it up as well. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> to speak on the floor for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, so ordered. mr. aguilar: thank you, mr. speaker. watching the news lately, it's nothing but donald trump and his baseless rhetoric. he's attacked a war hero but first attacked an entire country of people. donald trump is trying to get into the white house but it looks like he's already infiltrated congress. this bill on the floor of this house today has donald trump written all over it. this donald trump bill treats people like criminals who haven't even been arrested yet. c

law. it is complex, it is broken. this is the -- these are the statutes and the codes of regulation that our folks have to deal with every day and it is -- i implore your help in that regard. second johnson has made it clear that our borders are not open to illegal migration. as such i.c.e. is dedicating our resources towards the removal of individuals considered enforcement priorities. we are making some progress. along the southwest border this year apprehensions are down 110,000. that i see as a significant cost of time. 34,000 last year at this time. i, likewise our interior enforcement efforts are also paying off. of those people detained in our detention centers, 96% of them meet our top two priorities. 76% of them, 76% of them meet our top priority. so i believe that our people are doing a good thing and focusing on where the focus should be with respect to these hardened criminals. and you all know, of course, the enforcement work and the investigative work that our other side of t

now, with a new law in voting rights, i think we can say to you that we feel that that law is going to help move this country towards where we want to be. that all men are created equal. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2015] >> viewer watching american history tv, all weekend, every weekend on c-span3. to join the conversation, like us on facebook. >> each week, reel america brings you archival films that help tell the story of the 20th century.

references to the law.he system of has failed others like her. this is more than an academic discussion about prosecutorial discretion it is more than political pandering to certain voting constituencies, more than the supremacy clause. it is quite literally life and death. this is the real world where everyone isn't a dreamer and everyone isn't a valedictorian. there were criminals motivated by malice and a conscious disregard for the life of others and there are cities more interested in providing a sanctuary for those criminals than for their own law-abiding citizens. i have

it is a state law that states that. >> it is. >> the state law that states that. >> the city law says 2 hours and were going to watch people's coffee breaks and deduct that. >> no. >> more flexibility. >> excuse me. i'm feeling sick i have to leave. >> they may leave to leave 15 minutes early they can leave and collect on that 15 minutes but from my understanding the employer has to put that in writing so again, we went with what was the more - what benefited the employee more bans those two laws. >> so if someone calls in sick how does that work they have to ask for an 8 hour - >> i think if they call in sick for the day maybe a day maybe they get off at 5 and go to a doctor's appointment so left at 4:30 so ranch using an hour of sick leave thirty minutes. >> it's not exclusively. >> it you had to take someone to a doctor's appoint and you might miss 15 minutes of work coming in late it i think as stated it is designed to allow for the maximum flexibility for the employee to take that time and use it went. >> okay. >> and the hours are based on the regular shift times correct so if t

the rule of law is not a one-way traffic. the law, which only the government have to obey. the government have to obey it too. indeed, by chapter 60 of the original charter, the customs and liberties which the king had granted to our men, which meant, my men, the barons, had also to observe towards their men. they cascaded down through the feudal ranks. these three great ideas, the essentials of modern constitutionalism can all be found in the original magna carta of 1215. the idea that fundamental life -- rights can only be taken away or interfered with by due process and in accordance with the law. although when i get to the end of my lecture, you will see the debate whether "and" means "and" or "and" means "all." >> [laughter] justice hale: the idea that government rests upon the consent of government and that the government is bound by the law. no wonder lawyers get so excited by it. all three ideas begs the question of where the law comes from and who makes it. but i will come back to. -- that. historians, at least in my country, tend not to be so excited about the mag

law. one of the bills would grant permanence residence to maria ramirez and jay rojas whose u.s.-born children suffer from severe health conditions that could not be treated in their parents' home countries. the second would grand carina tarsinovik who came to the u.s. to care her fiance and then later husband who was a quadriplegic after being hit by a drunken driver in new jersey. mass love miss lofgren, would you like to make any statements. >> i would just note that we are of one mind when it comes to these private bills. >> without objection i would ask any written statements regarding these bills be made part of the written record. i move the subcommittee request departmental reports for these private bills pursuant for private immigration bills. the question is on the motion, those in favor say aye. the ayes have it, motion is agreed to and the reports are requested we will begin by welcoming everyone to this morning's hearings on sanctuary cities, a threat to public safety. i will

banking laws, environmental laws, and so on. we want that. we want that security.again, we are proud puerto ricans, but we are also proud american citizens. host: from largo, florida, a democrat. caller: good morning. guest: good morning. caller: my question to you is, you say that you are an american. you say that you are taking all the benefits that we give you. we have given you plenty of benefits, because i am a landlord. i rent a lot of homes to puerto ricans be a housing authority. my biggest question to you is, why don't you become a state? why the you take everything from the u.s., but yet you are not a state? therefore we should cut off everything that goes to puerto rico seÑor. whenguest: i like your attitude. that's what i'm all about. my quest in life is to change the status of puerto rico, make it the 51st state of the union. that makes sense and that is what i am fighting for. the bill that i have before congress called for an up or down vote on the admission of puerto rico to statehood. the same boat to hawaii and alaska had before they joined the un

. >> will congress pass kate's law?lost loved ones to criminal aliens spoke out. >> kate fell, looked a at me and said help me, dad. those are the last words i will ever hear from my daughter. >> caution, you are about to enter the no spin zone. the factor o'reilly factor special begins right now. ♪ ♪ >>> hi, i'm bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. we have a factor national exclusive, an interview with the parents of kate steinle shot to death by illegal alien felon. by all accounts, kate was a fine young woman. she grew up in pleasantton california outside of san francisco, earning a communications degree from cal poly. kate loved it to travel, exploring different cultures all around thehea world. she was also very charitable working with the challenged athletes foundation. summing up, kate wason a generous and caring person. her parents have set up a fund that will help causes close to kate's heart. we will give you that information in just a few moments. joining us nowmoment from pleasantton, jim steinle k

you have to go back to the voters i'm witnessing we're revisiting a law we passed last year already believe whether it is short-term rentals and housing or other types of sharing economy as we sunday evening to regulate it as companies grow like and we'd we're going to have to revisit those time after time going to the ballot is the wrong approach now there's been accounts that dive into the impact of the short-term rentals and i welcome that analysis i want to point out one statistic that is overlooked and is extremely important in the impact report the report looked at u.s. census daylight over 20 percent of units are a steady impact from 2012 to 2013 when the platforms started come to the market rapid increase in rent since 2010 and the - this means the impact of the short-term rentals is unclear and needs to be reexamined further and taking a heaven approach is the wrong approach to this complicated topic no denying the technology has changed the traditions and certain serves as we come to know and understand them i believe that government has and should play a role for the atmo

as a result, the law's original requirements have stayed in place. this as cost almost all of america's schools to be classified as failing under the terms of the law. president obama's education secretary offered waivers from the terms of the law. in return, the secretary told each of the 42 states currently operating under waivers exactly what steps to take and exactly how to evaluate teachers. so much new federal control of local schools has produced a backlash against common core teacher evaluation, and against tests in general. governors complain about federal overreach. infuriated teachers say the u.s. department of education has become a national human resources departments, or, they say, a national school board. no wish you has stirred as much controversy as testing. no child left behind requires students to take 17 standardized test over the course of kindergarten through their 12th grade education. as we study the problem, the issue seemed to be the stakes attached to the tests. a third grader is required to take one tests in math and one i

first of all, have you now written a law that we dubbed kate's law. and it's aggravated felony. alien with aggravated felon deported and comes back gets the minimum here. what's aggravated felony? who would oppose this law? who would oppose that? >> you have to remember there is advocacy group just today who said we should not change public policy just based upon isolated incident of the steinle murder. >> you are going to have a legion of people. >> five people testified but, remember, since in the last five years, 121 people have been murdered by criminal aliens. >> but why would any advocacy group and you figure that they want to help the poor, say you shouldn't put a person who is deported and comes back, who is a felon aggravated felon in prison? that's insane. i'm just trying to get the logic of this. you have been around a long time. is there any logic to not doing what you want to do? >> not as far as i'm concerned. but there are some people so fearful of certain segments of our population that you might call illegal aliens that anything to defend them, they are very rel

law. that's coming up in just a moment here on c-span3. before that, though, a look at how certain parts of the u.s. are neglecting immigration policy in places known as sanctuary city. >> marc rosenblum is with the migration policy snoout institute. there's been so much focus recently on these so-called sanctuary cities in light of the catherine steinly case. in your research can you help put some of the data to that issue. how many sanctuary cities are there out there and the numbers of undocumented aliens that live in those jurisdictions. a group called the irc estimates a little over 360 jurisdictions that limit their cooperation with i.c.e. when they do detainers. that's exactly what we mean when we're talking about sanctuary cities. mpi estimates those counties or counties and states are home to at least 5.9 million unauthorized democrats. that's about 53% of the unauthorized population in the u.s. more than half of the unauthorized immigrants live in jurisdictions that don't coopera

law?one? anyone here like to let me do that? every one of them here threaten national security because we don't know who they are. so they are a threat. we don't know who -- they make a decision to come here. they are not scared. they are invited by sanctuary city policies. they are not scared to stand in line for a handout that every american here has paid into the system for our children. if need be. they mistrust police because they come from countries that mistrust police. they are not scared here. i want you to know that our family is broken forever. we are forever broken. thank you. i thank you for your time. i don't want the sympathy. i want you to do something about it. everybody sitting here is in a position to do something. just throw your hat into the ring for americans. quit sitting silent because it's going to help you get a vote. throw your hat into the ring and take care of american families. thank you. >> thank you. senator grassley: personal thank you -- first of all thank

is bad law. it's bad precedence. if you want to do something creative, why don't we means-test everybody? so everybody knows what we're getting?and we help the people that need the help, and to tell you the truth, it looks to me like if we tag-team tenants from google, we're going to have people in these apartments for decades. thank you. >> thank you, next speaker. >> i'm here today because i'm concerned that this legislation will hurt both tenants and landlords and make the housing problem even worse. first the legislation regarding irl legal in-laws punish and scare away from those who encourage in-law rentals that the city needs. there are non-rent-controled single homes in the city, but the threat of any rent-control will scare away further develops of in-laws. second i hope our elected officials and elected leaders keep a balanced view and protect right of both tenants and landlords. it seems very popular and easy to vilify landlords, but please remember that the small landlords are also regular middle-class pe

kate's law senator ted cruz.ey graham. governor rick perry. governor bobby jindal, dr. ben carson and donald trump. senator rubio and jeb bush would not tell us if they would support kate's law. that surprised me. this is a vital issue and to sit it out doesn't seem to be in the interest of the public. if you oppose kate's law tell the folks why guys. to say nothing disturbing it me senator rand paul noncommittal saying he does not take a position on legislation not yet written. governor mike huckabee says he would support a law that would call for immediate deportation with illegal alien felons the problem with that governor, they come back as we have proven in the kate steinle murder. hillary clinton and bernie sanders ignored our request not unusual for mrs. clinton. on the senate side though, there is some very good news. senator chuck grassley chairman of the senate judiciary committee has scheduled a heerlg for illegal alien crimes next tuesday. parents of kate steinle have invited we are hoping they will a

state laws. when i hear the phrase, century city. as benign sounding as it is, it may have been a sanctuary for that defendant, that it sure as hell was not a sanctuary for a woman walking with her father. so at a minimum, change the name of whatever benign sounding program cities like san francisco want to follow and the money ought to be cut and i would hope that you would insist that federal detainers be honored and not be discretionary. with that, i yield back. chairman goodlatte: the chair thanks the gentleman and recognizes the gentleman from new york. >> mr. chairman, i would first welcome secretary johnson. i would like to remind mr. gowdy that it does not trump the federal amendment. the federal court has held the fourth amendment. there were indeed troubles and the courts and i want to commend the administration for trying to violate policy that is not unconstitutional. as the prior policy was. now, secretary johnson, i have heard significant concerns. i realize this is of the one topic

and federal law trumps state law, so god knows it trumps the law in san francisco. and when i hear the phrase sanctuary city, as benign sounding as it is it may have been a sanctuary for that defendant, but it sure as hell was not a sanctuary for a young woman walking with her father. so at a minimum changed the name of whatever benign sounding program cities like san francisco want to follow and the money ought to be cut. and i would hope you would insist federal detainers be honored and not discretionary. with that i would yield back to the chairman. >> chair thanks the gentleman and recognize the gentleman from new york mr. nadler for five minutes. >> as the former chairman of the constitution subsubcommittee, remind mr. gowdy, the federal courts have held detainers unconstitutional as violations of the fourth amendment. so when secretary johnson said there were troubles in the courts, there were indeed troubles in the courts. and i want to commend the administration for trying to follow a policy that is not unconstitutional illegal on its face as the prior polic

law? anyone? anyone here like to let me do that? every one of them here threaten national security because we don't know who they are. so they are a threat. we don't know who -- they make a decision to come here. they are not scared. they are invited by sanctuary city policies. they are not scared to stand in line for a handout that every american here has paid into the system for our children. if need be. they mistrust police because they come from countries that mistrust police. they are not scared here. i want you to know that our family is broken forever. we are forever broken. thank you. i thank you for your time. i don't want the sympathy. i want you to do something about it. everybody sitting here is in a position to do something. just throw your hat into the ring for americans. quit sitting silent because it's going to help you get a vote. throw your hat into the ring and take care of american families. thank you. >> thank you. senator grassley: first of all thank you for your test

, integration laws? the federal response would be sweet, certain and immediate. now, for those of you who want to protect illegals and allow them to cooperate with law enforcement, no sanctuary is needed. the law is already in place. it's called a u shvisa. i used it as district attorney. if you are illegal and you want to report a crime, this visa protects you, allows you and your family, sanctuary, fro deportation. so enough of this benign-sounding sanctuary nonsense that protects illegal criminals. at what point do we say these killings must ends or are you willing to risk it to protect the criminal illegal? and who would it be okay to lose? your son? your mother? or as mr. steinly did last week, his own daughter, katherine? and that's my open. tell me what you think on my facebook page or twitter #judge seeni jeanine. >>> let's get to form a national co-chair of president obama's re-election campaign and also founder and executive director of the accountability project, mickey, thanks, for joining us

but the enshrined view is from now on the law is not -- we're not a nation of laws. we're a nation of judges. this is a rule of judges. and you have to appeal to their policy preferences. not to the legal materials that should form their judgment. so a gigantic step backwards in terms of the rule aflaw. >> i knew there was a risk that we would not get to all the cases i wanted to discuss but let's say we can get a couple more in and hopefully time for a couple of questions. so john, let's turn back to you. so the court decided in a number of significant criminal law cases this having to do with the death penalty and fourth amendment and cases having to do with men's rea requirements including one of the cases which you argued. talk about that. >> anthony alonice was a 27-year-old working at a park when his wife of seven years dumped him and took their two kids. being an american he thought this was something -- if there's something worth saying it's worth sharing with everyone on earth. so every thought he had on the subject he posted to facebook. some of the things

in 1996 a bill that i haven't introduced became law. a part of that law mandated that local officials cooperate with federal immigration officials. do you feel that san francisco and other cities are violating current federal law? >> i don't have the judgment with regard to that. >> you have no opinion as to whether or not you think that these are provided in current or federal law. >> i do not have a legal judgment on that question. >> i am appalled that you do not. the number of sanctuary cities has been increasing dramatically has the administration on anything to discourage a city from becoming a sanctuary city. >> absolutely, every day. >> has the administration tried to talk about >> county supervisors, city council members with those individuals pursuant. >> i'm asking you if you discourage anyone from becoming a sanctuary city. >> i am encouraging people to cooperate. >> it says that you are encouraging operation and i'm asking you to try to become a sanctuary city. >> that is pretty critical if you're not doing anything for enc

the family wants to be involved in the language of the law so we have a sense of kate within the law.t's very important to us. >> i think what we would like to do is bring you both to washington to talk to the congressman and the senators who are putting the law together. they go on vacation in august. i think when they come back we will get you both to washington to talk to them face to face. maybe to testify in front of some committees there so you can have input and we will report every step of the way. i think you are absolutely right that this law is named after your daughter and you should have input into it. so we are going to make that happen for you. it will be at our expense and we will fly you into washington and set up the meetings for you. would that be okay for you guys to do? >> that would be wonderful. >> that would be fantastic. >> yeah. because we will make that happen. >> kate would be proud. kate would be proud. >> we are doing it for her. we are doing it for you and doing it for all americans. >> absolutely. >> i have researched your daughter. you know, i'm thinki

that's a criminal offense because the federal law as you know, overrides the state law the city law.ion won't enforce the 1996 law signed by bill clinton, these cities, it's anarchy. it's total anarchy. >> this is not the only issue on which the obama administration unilaterally stops enforcing the law. it's done so with low level drug crime where they basically told their prosecutors supposed to be discretion but it's really overriding the law unconstitutionally that certain crimes with minimum sentences are simply not to it be prosecuted and even evidence to be withheld so it doesn't trigger the automatic sentence. they have done it, of course on immigration where they essentially unilaterally passed the dream act. you can argue that the dream act is a good idea. but that's for congress to go. it's not for the administration to do. and the whole thing the beingsive order obama signed last year that is now being held up by a texas judge because it is unconstitutional is a way of simply unilaterally saying we are not going to enforce the immigration laws that are on the books passed

is your suit premised on the change in the law, or is it premised on the law as you found it when your client was not allowed the conceal permit? >> the law may have changed but our theory has not. >> just a minute. it seems to me if if i am to apply the law as existed as to the carry. open carry that existed at the time when your client was not given this conceal permit at that point, your client could have opened carried if you will an unarmed weapon, and also could have carried some ammunition to put in the weapon. now, it is that he can't carry either. does your case live or die on that change? >> no, it does not. if anything our case has become stronger. at the time -- >> why is it stronger? it didn't change for your client. i'm trying to say can i apply the facts as they were at the time your client was denied his permit, are you suggesting i have to change the theory and apply the change in the law? if so, why not go ask the district court again whether you're really right or not? i'm just trying to test you. >> sure. the court's opinion didn't turn on that availability. >> i th

he made clear that the law is the law and it can continue to work.he enforcement will continue at the rate it is and that companies will thrive and innovate. host: we will have to leave it there for now but thank you for being part of "newsmakers." >> next, homeland security secretary jeh johnson at a house hearing on immigration enforcement. after that, president obama talks with reporters about the iran new year deal and other issues. -- the iran nuclear deal and other issues. tonight on "q&a," matt -- molly crabapple on her use of rawlings to tell investigative stories from around the world. >> gang affiliation might mean reading a book by a black panther even having a tattoo. pelican bay is not alone in this. around the country, you can land in solitary for your art reading, believe, sexual orientation, or your friends. i go around with a sketchbook and draw. that is not necessarily to show the venice drawing but to build a rapport with people. when you have a camera, it puts a difference -- a distance between you and the person. you're taking th

violating federal law.eople who are not doing their jobs, the san francisco people ne don't do it they get charged with crime. you know they are going to do it, the other thing william is, in l.a. there is a lot of illegal alien gangs. cops know who these gangs are. they know who has been convicted. once kate's law passes they swoop them right off the street and they are out five years. okay? they can swoop them up just for being here with a felony. so, that's why we have to get it done. so this trial of this drug dealer is ongoing in spokane, right? >> right as we speak the murder trial? >> it's actually coming up in november, bill but yeah, they are in custody right now. >> all right. now, in fresno, california, there was such a problem with criminal illegal aliens that the sheriff there did the right thing. tell us about that. >> so california has a law called the trust act which prohibits sheriffs, which run the jails from honoring these ice detainers but in fresno the sheriff there margaret mims says i

we have this law in play. kate's law. this guy, by the way, who killed kate five times he was deported and then kept coming back to sanctuary cities because they give him a free pass. >> no, you're absolutely right, david. it's so disturbing on so many levels. serious immigration challenges in this country. this particular story is just horrific and heart wrenching, especially for any parent out there. the question is, is our federal society being undermined. a lot of oissue issues at play. what rich suggested this knee-jerk politics where we're rushing to pass laws that i very often feel uncomfortable with that immigration is bad and all immigrants are bad and i don't think that's the tone that republicans want or that's good for the country. we need to address some of the very serious challenges and i'm not sure this law is the right way of doing it. >> the bottom line is, we're focusing on immigrants. we should really be focusing on policies, bad policies create bad behavior. when you have sanctuary cities you have cri

we will change laws to allow us to implement law and justice as soon as possible. within days laws against terrorism should be presented. >> those developments could be a direct reference to monday's assassination. the car bomb bore the hallmarks of a group based in the sinai peninsula waging attacks on security forces. police are investigating how the group was behind another explosion on tuesday, in the cairo suburb of 6 object. three people were killed. some opposition leaders were worried that president abdul fatah al-sisi will use the new laws to crackdown on the outlawed brotherhood group. >> this will lead to noing but a catastrophe. it will undermine and shake the foundation of justice in egypt. it will find the judiciary system in egypt. >> reporter: hundreds of muslim brotherhood members have been sentenced to death, including the ousted president mohamed mursi. he still has many supporters like these demonstrators calling for reinstatement and return of democracy. they say the government is out to crush dissent, replacing mass protests with mass arrests

there are larry that was the law passed by this commission in 2010 and it gutted any reporting from the chamber of commerce you have not fixed it you're trying to fix what was done wrong in the fail to do so it will be a problem for this commission i would like to point out in terms of of the issue of nonprofit your confusing 501-c 3 and 4 3s can spend a southern percentage and have to report to the irs are you saying to the sfifkts that has to be recorded to the irs but we don't have to report to the people of san francisco that's nuts. >> i'm bob planet hold i want to advocate for pga 24 pretty much in the form it is again, we're going going back to once was in the event and when it was in the event the sky doesn't fall and city government if freeze it is inappropriate to talk about the speculative problems now, one reason to pass this we've heard the example of airbnb bush your chart our agency showed on lobby expenditures showed for 6 and a half months in 2014 they spent $604 yet the staffers were talking to different people and reporters was talking to people in the planning co

, integration laws? the federal response would be sweet, certain and immediate. now, for those of you who want to protect illegals and allow them to cooperate with law enforcement, no sanctuary is needed. the law is already in place. it's called a u shvisa. i used it as district attorney. if you are illegal and you want to report a crime, this visa protects you, allows you and your family, sanctuary, from deportation. so enough of this benign-sounding sanctuary nonsense that protects illegal criminals. at what point do we say these killings must ends or are you willing to risk it to protect the criminal illegal? and who would it be okay to lose? your son? your mother? or as mr. steinly did last week, his own daughter, katherine? and that's my open. tell me what you think on my facebook page or twitter #judge seeni jeanine. >>> let's get to form a national co-chair of president obama's re-election campaign and also founder and executive director of the accountability project, mickey, thanks, for joining u

for pending releases for repeat felons including those deported on multiple occasions how some of the law enforcement leadership has chosen to exercise or ignore their existing authority remains a question of concern for example there's a policy in place today that prohibits this kind of communication within it the sheriff's deputies and officials in the case of repeat felons this policy is a threat to public safety this policy should be rescinded immediately supervisors to you i say thank you for standing strong in support of our values to protect the immigrant communities like those who politicalize her murder and slander the city awhile much of the nation and certainly this city has been focused on this heartbreaking tragedy and event we are keeping focus on other critical needs especially housing today this board is posed to vote on the biggest affordable housing bond in this city in this investment it is historic $210 million housing bonds that will not raise property tax i want to thank uh-huh for your support and partnership this will help build public housing and speed up housing

of a lawful court order. i think most people involved in the encryption process and development-based products would not want to thwart law enforcement, whether it is for a criminal case or terrorism. but that kind of advertising does trouble me. and i won't ask you to respond to that. i do want to switch to access to a different kind of information. that suggests how much we need a computer cyber security law. i just met with the ceo of a large bank. he relayed to me an incident where the fbi knew that his bank had been targeted for cyber attack. here is what he told me had to happen. he said that the fbi, under current law, could not immediately go to this bank and convey the information. first, they had to go to the bank regulators, the occ regional office. then the information had to go from there to the occ in washington. from there, it had to go to the department of homeland security. then the department of homeland security approved the fbi contacting the bank to warn them of this eminent attack. well

and due process of law is. that is where the conversation has ended. it is extremely sad that we are here in this place, reflecting on the killing of miss stienle and looking at how we can prevent further tragedies. and this brings me back to the days when i was a super visor in other neighborhoods. i made it a point because public safety is important to me in my time as a legislature to attend every homicide scene which i did in all seven years and meet with the family and loved ones to sort through and assess ways to prevent tragedies like that happening again. i haven't left that same instinct that i carried forth as sheriff to the family when they are ready and should care to i would be more than happy to meet with them again, so that we can learn from this and summon that collective wisom without the political oportunism to remedy of what has been spotlighted by this incident. and i hope that the legacy of the tragic event propels, propels all of us, i think to muster the measured minds that how we can imp