— linnell. you essentially agree to theirappointment? yes. is linnell.ointment? yes. is it that extent. would _ their appointment? yes. is it that extent, would you _ their appointment? yes. is it that extent, would you accept that you and the jfsa extent, would you accept that you and thejfsa were both therefore involved in the appointment of second sight? to involved in the appointment of second sight?— involved in the appointment of second siaht? ., . , , second sight? to that extent, yes. can we turn — second sight? to that extent, yes. can we turn to _ second sight? to that extent, yes. can we turn to second _ second sight? to that extent, yes. can we turn to second sight's - second sight? to that extent, yes. | can we turn to second sight's remit, please. you tell us in paragraph 11! of your statement that you do not recall being involved in setting a second site the public remit in terms of reference. —— second sight's remit. if we look at the e—mail at the bottom of the page from simon baker to you on 14th november, head of business change mr bak