court judge's suspension of the travel ban. a legal victory would reinstate at least for now that travel ban. >> and the appeal has been filed with the 9th circuit court of appeals which will hear the case. the three judges who may hear the case were an pointed separately by former presidents jimmy carter, george w. bush and barack obama. the justice department is making several different arguments in its appeal to get the suspension of that travel ban overturned. >> cnn justice reporter laura jarrett told us earlier what those argues might involve. >> this is a strongly worded legal filing. just after midnight here on the east coast, the u.s. justice department moved for what's called an emergency stay of the sweeping decision out of seattle that temporarily halted the enforcement of president trump's travel ban on a nationwide basis. and in this legal filing, the justice department says that block the travel ban "harms the public," and second-guesses the president's national security judgment. the thrust of the argument here being made by the justice department are two different prongs. first one is that the plaintiffs in the case, the case wa

liz: and 9th circuit court of appeals will release its decision, between now and 9:00. ling on legality of president's executive order, issuing a travel ban from 7 countries, protester calling the -- racist. do middl middle east ern leaders and europeans feel the same way? president calls many mideast leaders to talk about it details next. >> dr. jasser will weigh in after this, back in two, don't go away. why pause a spontaneous moment? cialis for daily use treats ed and the urinary symptoms of bph. tell your doctor about your medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas® for pulmonary hypertension, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have a sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision, or an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis. this is one gorgeous truck. special edition.

because that ruling yesterday from the 9th circuit court of appeals also addressed the merits of thisas specific on these seven countries that he was talking about here. so, that's what his lawyers and the -- here at the white house, the justice department, have to figure out if they can draw in a more narrow way here, wolf. but the president, of course, wants this, but he's getting his first taste this week of the limits at times of executive power. >> yeah, we're going to get the tape. >> indeed. >> once everyone emerges from air force one, you're looking at live pictures on the tar mack there, the president, the japanese prime minister abe will be coming down the stairs momentarily. we'll also get the tape of the q. and a. with the president aboard the plane. one other thing, i'm just reading the pool report. president was asked about the iranian president's comments that any nation that threatens iran will, quote, regret it. the president responded, quote, he better be careful. we're going to get that tape and play it for our viewers as soon as it comes in. but david shalian, let

of comments from the president. wolf? >> athena jones, our white house court, thank you very much. and we have some breaking news. the 9th circuit court of appeals in san francisco has just announced the three judges have reached a decision on president trump's proposed travel ban. that decision will be announced. the 9th circuit court of appeals says within hours before the close of business day out on the west coast. that would be in san francisco, of course, cnn will have extensive live coverage once we get the decision from those three judges. in the meantime, let's get some more on what's going on with the democratic senator jean sha heen of new hampshire, she's a member of the foreign relations and armed services committee. you see the breaking news we're getting. what do you hope the decision is, senator? >> well, obviously i hope they will strike down the executive order on immigration. i think this is an order that is unamerican, it's not consistent with our values of a nation that's built on immigrants. it was poorly implemented. there is still a lot of confusion about what it means. i think it's not good for us economically. i'm heari

9th circuit, wants all of his or her colleagues. to vote whether or not 9th circuit on bank should rehear the case that the three-judge panel denied the stay of. now 9th circuit court of appealing reaching out for briefs to whether or not the case should be reheard. i informed reince priebus of that, he ran back into the white house coconfer with his colleagues, then white house may rewrite the executive order on extreme vetting, tighten up the language so there is no legal problem with it. president trump spoke to the pool about it. >> the unfac unfortunate part is it takes time, we'll win that battle. we also have a lot of other options, including filing a whole new order, i like to surprise you, we need speed. for reasons of security. it could very well, that we to that. reporter: difficult to hear but president said they might rewrite the order that would be extreme vetting executive order, a pi big problem that 9 circuit judge had, it did not have a specific carve out for legal permanent residents of the country. and people who were here on visas, if they were students or professors might not be able to get back in, if they left to visit family at home, white house is mull

court. of the cases reviewed by the supreme court. 86% of the 9th circuit court of appeal case were overturneddon't review all of the ruling from the 9th. but of those they decided to take a look at, 86% were overturned. so this is by no means a final victory for washington and their lawyers. they believe they will win at the supreme court and they say they will take it all the way up there if they need to. lou: that victory could cost american lives. so i hope they are not clicking their heels too loudly. up next, president trump insisted his executive order is legal. >> here it is. people coming in. suspend. the entry of all aliens. right? it's not like -- again, a bad high school student would understand this. lou: attorneys david ritman and john hoffman join me next. d pay. you've earned your medicare. it was a deal that was made long ago, and aarp believes it should be honored. thankfully, president trump does too. "i am going to protect and save your social security and your medicare. you made a deal a long time ago." now, it's congress' turn. tell them to protect medicare. this is one g

court. of the cases reviewed by the supreme court. 86% of the 9th circuit court of appeal case were overturned. they don't review all of the ruling from the 9th. but of those they decided to take a look at, 86% were overturned. so this is by no means a final victory for washington and their lawyers. they believe they will win at the supreme court and they say they will take it all the way up there if they need to. lou: that victory could cost american lives. so i hope they are not clicking their heels too loudly. up next, president trump insisted his executive order is legal. >> here it is. people coming in. suspend. the entry of all aliens. right? it's not like -- again, a bad high school student would understand this. lou: attorneys david ritman and john hoffman join me n n n n n liberty mutual stood with me when i was too busy with the kids to get a repair estimate. liberty did what? yeah, with liberty mutual all i needed to do to get an estimate was snap a photo of the damage and voila! voila! (sigh) i wish my insurance company had that... wait! hold it... hold it boys... there's supposed

top story, 9th circuit court of appeals ruling against the trump administration withholding a temporary restraining order. president responding, see you in court, the security of our nation is at stake. the 9th circuit courts ruling stated this among other things. we hold that the government has not shown a likelihood of success on merits of its appeal or failure to enter a stay would cause irrespectable injury. the justice department argued that the extreme vetting order is a traditional national security judgment that's assigned exclusively to political branches of trudg trump administration. to ask a larger panel of judges to hear the appeal on temporary restraining order to ask the supreme court to weigh in on an emergency basis. to accept th the appellate court order go back to seattle base federal district court and begin a new. joining me on the phone, judge andrew napolitano. this order coming from the most reversed and most left wing appellate court in the country is no surprise, but it is on its face shocking to see their dismissal of the constitutional powers that are reserve

i want to turn first to this 9th circuit court of appeal. hat on it face looks reasonable. everyone -- nearly everyone is saying what is the point of what this district court did. >> i think obviously the law is on the side of the president. but i do think this. the appeals court, two members voted to hold it up. the same two judges will be two of the three tomorrow. both democrats. they add one republican. lou: that's a balance. >> june canaby is 85 and an expert in indian law. and one graduated from berkeley law. when you look at the entire court, there are 18 democrats and 7 republicans. howie: do you love these people who say the president is politicizing the judiciary saying so-called judge when this court is known as the most left wing court in the country. you have got chuck schumer as i said earlier, going after in a scorched earth pursuit june neil gorsuch, to deny him a seat, arguably one of the most qualified jurists since scalia. >> the way you get to be a federal judge is you get nominated by a senator from your state. in those t

of washington also reacted calling the court's refusal to reinstate the travel ban a win for washington and the country. >> this is a complete victory for the state of washington. the 9th circuit court of appeals in a unanimous decision effectively granted everything we sought. we are a nation of laws. and as i have said, as we have said, from day one, those laws apply to everybody in our country, and that includes the vice president the united states. >> and also tweeting tonight is california's senator kamala harris. she wrote, the fight is not over but this is a great victory for our values. the judges said they acknowledge there is strong public opinion on both sides but also said the ideas behind the ban, quote, run contrary to the fundamental structure of our constitutional democracy. >> so can dierks what's next here? >> that's the big question now. based on the president's reaction it sounds like the administration is going to appeal and fight to reinstate this ban. sought can go before the supreme court. now, however, the ban is set to expire in 90 days. so it would likely run its course before it even gets to that point. >> candice nguyen in our newsroom, thank you. still to come we

the 9th circuit court of appeals in san francisco has ruled that president trump's controversial ban ll remain on hold. >> for more we're joined by david la screen, prefer at the school of law. david first of all, what are the options now for the department of justice and the trump administration? >> sure. they've got probably three options. the most likely one they are going to take is that they're going to go to the supreme court in washington, and they're going to try and get the emergency stay that they failed to get today from the 9th circuit from either justice kennedy or more likely try to get five votes of justices in washington. that's one way to go. another way to go would be to follow the briefing schedule with judge robart set up for the next phase in the case in seattle, and the least likely one is to try and get a majority of the 9th circuit judges to intervene at this stage. so two long shots and one is more of a sure thing in the sense that the proceedings can go in the normal course. we have a briefing schedule in seattle. that's where they should go. let's move along

the 9th circuit court of appeals made it very clear that the current executive order ru ns that the currents afoul of the constitution and would not lift the ban on the executive order. i don't think the president will fare much better in the supreme court, we only have eightjustices the supreme court, we only have eight justices sitting there the supreme court, we only have eightjustices sitting there and if it would make it to that court in all likelihood there would be a split decision along ideological lines which would mean the night 9th circuit court of appeals opinion would defect to be the law. essentially a major loss for this president and his administration and i don't think rewriting the ban is going to fare much better because a sio you and other civil rights lawyers have vowed to continue to fight in the court systems any effo rts fight in the court systems any efforts to ban individuals from this country on the basis of their religion. i want to move onto illegal immigrants in the united states now concerned they might be deported. tell us why they're concerned? there's been

court judge's suspension of the travel ban. a legal victory would reinstate at least for now that travel ban. >> and the appeal has been filed with the 9th circuitappeals which will hear the case. the three judges who may hear the case were an pointed separately by former presidents jimmy carter, george w. bush and barack obama. the justice department is making several different arguments in its appeal to get the suspension of that travel ban

this weekend, the 9th circuit court of appeals denied the trump administration request to set aside a judge's ruling putting a hold on the ban. companies are not a party in the lawsuit. this friend of the court filing could allow them brief with the intent to influence the court's decision. president trump said he is trying to protect americans. president trump criticized the decision, tweeting, because the ban was lifted by a judge, many bad and dangerous people may be pouring into our country. a terrible decision. you can see the brief and the names of all 97 tech companies a are on our website. matt keller, abc 7 news. >> thank you. >>> a young girl from yemen finally reunited with her family who lives here in california. her parents are both u.s. citizens. because of immigration laws, it further co -- further complicated by president trump's travel ban, she was stranded in yemen for years. >> reporter: after four years apart, ali waited anxiously for her little sister, i mman, to arrive at sfo on u.s. soil for the first time. >> over here! >> reporter: with a grin across her face,

he is moving on from his defeat at 9th circuit court of appeals. he have breaking news on that. white house source telling fox news that white house will likely not appeal the 9th circuit decisions or file an appeal with the supreme court. the plan is to fight it out in u.s. district court in seattle on the merits of the executive order, and at the same time still doing extreme vetting. this has market closes at record highs, president's new tax cut plans take shape, retro active to the beginning of the year. welcome to risk risk, -- "risk & reward." including refugees, from 7 terror hot spots, president turning to extreme vetting, again. >> we will be extreme vetting, which is a term that i developed early in my campaign, because i saw what was happening. i have learned tremendous things that you could only learn if you were in a certain position, namely president. and there are tremendous threats to our country. we will not allow that to happen. liz: the attorney general for washington state, which started the fight against president, celebrated after last night's decision. >>

tomorrow afternoon arguments are set to be heard by a three- jouling panel of the 9th circuit court of appeals. >> a number of groups have joined together to challenge the white house ban on immigrants from seven muslim- majority cubs. among those groups the state of california and more than 90 tech companies. >> ktvu's monty francis is here now with the government response which was just filed. >> the government filed this 15- page brief late this afternoon. the white house is calling the lower court's injunction vastly overbroad and is reasserting the president's authority to impose rules on immigration. travelers who had been previously barred from entering the u.s. are now making it past customs at u.s. airports since the ruling on friday from a federal jig washington state halted the ban on immigrants from seven majority muslim countries. travelers such as this woman who lived in the u.s. with a visa for seven years but went home to attend her father's funeral in libya. she was initially prevent from returning home to the u.s. >> it was a tough experience. i am proud that i'm libyan, but

the hour-long hearing will take place by telephone...the judges are with the 9th circuit court of appeals in san francisco. they will determine the immediate fate of the nationwide temporary restraining order áagainstá the president's travel ban....after a federal judge in seattle halted the ban last friday. and today...97 tech companies, including apple google facebook and twitter filed a brief...opposing the ban, calling it unconstitutional and bad for business and the economy. the white house says its confidnet the ban is constitutional. i'm gl, k4n. the rain is really coming down in parts of the bay area...and it's not going to let up. meteorologist brittney shipp is back with what you need to know..before you head out the door. lots of rain tonight into tomorrow. flooding concerns for us. what are you doing up? mom said i could have a midnight snack. it's not even midnight, it's ten forty-three. well, let's have a ten forty-three snack. quietly, though. okay. yeah. mmmm. shhhh. hey i'll share my yoplait custard if you share your yoplait dippers? deal. deal. mmmm. the family favorite.

the 9th circuit court of appeals is probably the most liberal court in the nation. so the white house is looking to the supreme court to eventually decide all of this. >> wow. this morning new reaction from the president on a poll about extreme vetting, right? we've been watching ing thating by online. >> a lot of people have a lot of different opinions. the opinion research corporation cnn poll finds 53% of people are against the extreme vetting order whereas 47% agree with it. think it's necessary. that prompted the president to lash out again on twitter saying, quote, any negative polls are fake news like the cnn abc, nbc polls in the election. sorry, people want secure borders and vetting. the court battle may go on longer than it was supposed to last. the longest portion of this was 120 day refugee suspension from seven countries and indefinite suspension on syria scheduled to last four months. the court cases could go on for longer than that. >> thank you for that. >> what will happen in the ninth circuit? let's bring in the chef political correspondent for th

has until 3:00 this afternoon to respond to the latest round of legal finding and the 9th circuit court of appeals could make a decision on this as early as tomorrow. the 9th circuit court covers most of the western united states including alaska and hawaii but it is head quartered here in san francisco. so that's why the next chapter in this legal battle is going to be happening here. back to you guys. >>> in an interview over the weekend, president trump said he may take action against california where lawmakers are considering legislation that would make california a sanctuary state. >> i don't want to defund the city or anybody. i want to give them the money they need to properly operate as a city or state. they will have sanctuary cities -- we may have to do that. certainly that's a weapon. >> on another issue president trump said he respects vladimir putin. >> i respect a lot of people but that doesn't mean i'm going to get along with them. he's a leader of his country. i say it's better to get along with rushsz than not and they can help us in the fight against isis -- -- russia and islamic

the 9th circuit court of appeals is set to determine whether president trump's executive order on immigration remains effectively frozen, or whether it will resume. it began with a sweeping decision late friday when a federal district court judge in washington state issued a temporary restraining order blocking key provisions of the policy. for now, that decision lifts the travel ban imposed on seven mostly muslim countries, pending a final decision on its legality. in the wake of that ruling, president trump took to twitter to attack the federal judge's decision as well as his legitimacy, "the opinion of this so-called judge which essentially takes law enforcement away from our country is ridiculous and will be overturned." now we await a decision from the reliably liberal the 9th circuit court in san francisco, department of justice filed a brief asking that court to reinstate the president's policy. they argue that "the president has expansive constitutional authority over foreign affairs, national security and immigration." well this could be the beginning of a constitutional showdown, ex

something brand-new happened at the 9th circuit court of appeal. e of the judges of the 29 active judges on the 9th circuit requested the entire 9th circuit court vote on whether to rehear that case en banc. and they asked the white house and the states in washington state and minnesota, the plaintiffs in the state to file briefs as to whether this thing should be reheard. this is a moving target. and things change minute by minute. that's where we are with all of this right now. this right now. charles: a lot to o o o o afoot and light-hearted i take to the open road. healthy, free, the world before me, the long brown path before me leading wherever i choose. the east and the west are mine. the north and the south are mine. all seems beautiful to me. >> obamacare as you know is a total and complete disaster. so we'll end up with tremendous healthcare at a lower price and i think people will be extremely happy. difficult process, but once we get going, tom price was just approved a few hours ago. so we finally have our secretary. now we get down to

something brand-new happened at the 9th circuit court of appeal. of the judges of the 29 active judges on the 9th circuit requested the entire 9th circuit court vote on whether to rehear that case en banc. and they asked the white house and the states in washington state and minnesota, the plaintiffs in the state to file briefs as to whether this thing should be reheard. this is a moving target. and things change minute by minute. that's where we are with all of this right now. charles: a lot to talk about so we'll be right back. tting edge university counts on centurylink to keep their global campus connected. and why a pro football team chose us to deliver fiber-enabled broadband to more than 65,000 fans. and why a leading car brand counts on us to keep their dealer network streamlined and nimble. businesses count on communication, and communication counts on centurylink. >> obamacare as you know is a total and complete disaster. so we'll end up with tremendous healthcare at a lower price and i think people will be extremely happy. difficult proce

what the 9th circuit court of appeals basically said today, is that the federal gov't can't show an urgent reason as to why people's right should be violated.pkgsot - this is only one step in what will be a long, legal battlevisa holders and refugees can continue to enter the united states, after the 9th circuit court of appeals placed a temporary restraining order on the muslim ban. executive director of the northern california a-c-l-u abdi soltani says president trump is basically carrying out campaign promises. and this won't be the end of it.sot - donald trump said he wants to ban muslims, that he was considering a muslim registry, and there's going to be many many manifestations of that basic policy over the course of the next 4 yearspresident trump tweeted his response to the ruling"see you in court, the state of our union is at stake."sot - who knows what he meant when he said see you in court. he may have meant see you in court im going to appeal this to the supreme court. the problem is, there's only 8 judges on the supreme court. and the chances are it would be a 4-4 tie at best.

what the 9th circuit court of appeals basically said today, is that the federal gov't can't show an urgent reason as to why people's right should be violated.pkgsot - this is only one step in what will be a long, legal battlevisa holders and refugees can continue to enter the united states, after the 9th circuit court of appeals placed a temporary restraining order on the muslim ban. executive director of the northern california a-c-l-u abdi soltani says president trump is basically carrying out campaign promises. and this won't be the end of it.sot - donald trump said he wants to ban muslims, that he was considering a muslim registry, and there's going to be many many manifestations of that basic policy over the course of the next 4 yearspresident trump tweeted his response to the ruling"see you in court, the state of our union is at stake."sot - who knows what he meant when he said see you in court. he may have meant see you in court im going to appeal this to the supreme court. the problem is, there's only 8 judges on the supreme court. and the chances are it would be a 4-4 tie at best.

president trump with a real critique of the legal system in the 9th circuit court of appeals. here is a piece of what he said in his speech? >> i listen to lawyers on both sides last night. they were talking about things that had nothing to do with it. i listened to a panel of judges and i'll comment on that. i will not comment on the statements made by certainly one judge. if these judges wanted to, in my opinion, help the court in terms of respect for the court, they do what they should be doing. it is so sad. >> john, lawyers in any case often advise their clients not to talk if they have pending litigation if they are in the middle of a lawsuit. was it wise for the president to jump in before anything has been decided and be so critical? >> that's a really good question. if you go and condemn the judicial branch, the supreme court does not look at that very nicely. think of it in the long-term. if this ends up in the supreme court and president trump is attack the whole judicial branch, they are going o probably stick up for their colleagues. from that perspective, it is no

this report was requested in light of the 9th circuit court of appeals conclusion that the trump administration, quote, has pointed to no evidence that any alien from any of the countries named in the order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the united states. but cnn has also learned that some current intelligence officials in the trump administration are concerned about this assignment. first, some disagree with the trump white house's position. sources telling cnn that the department of homeland securities in-house intelligence agency which is called the office of intelligence or analysis or ina has filed a report disagreeing with the view that blocking immigration from these seven countries strategically makes senls. some dhs officials have said they do not think that nationality is the best indicator of potential terrorism. a spokes woman for the department of homeland security confirmed this report to cnn saying, quote, while dhs was asked to draft a comprehensive report on this issue, the document you're referencing was commentary from a single intelligence source versus an official r

cnn's sara sidner is at the 9th circuit court of appeals, where the notice of appeal was just filed aours ago. and cnn's jessica schneider is there in west palm beach. let's go ahead and start with sara. very convoluted legal story. sara, help us understand what happened today and what happens next. >> reporter: so what we so far now is the department of justice has put together a notice for a motion to appeal. we don't know what the merits of that will be because they haven't actually filed the appeal. but what they're really asking for is to stop the judge in washington from enforcing what he has said is a pause or a stop on the ban for now, a temporary restraining order. so what they want to do is have the travel ban or restriction, if you will, in place and that's what the doj will eventually be fighting for. you are seeing protests all over the place. there are protests here in san francisco as well. but there are legal merits that the court will have to look at very closely and to help us understand what's going to happen next we have rory little. he is a law professor here at u

9th court of appeals is exceptionally liberal, almost in my opinion, i think they're likely to p reject president trump's order on the supreme court. it's tied 4-4, they'll kick it back to the 9th circuit court of appealswhere that stands. >> if the appellate upholds judge robard, the clip that ashley has been commenting about and the supreme court ties 4-4 on a government appeal, that puts the 9th circuit court of appeals ruling in effect because the tie doesn't disturb the decision below. stuart: so the president could lose. >> yes, but remember, this is a preliminary restraining order. this is not permanent. this is a preliminary restraining order until there can be a trial. what would the trial be? it's the state of washington and the state of minnesota versus donald j. trump. the state's arguing in behalf of their residents and taxpayers, that people in those states will be harmed. in my view, the 9th circuit will surprise you and the 9th circuit will say that the states don't have standing to sue. in federal court you can't sue and say i'm here because someone else has been harmed. the person or entity who has been harmed is the one that has to bring the suit. stuart: i'm significant that we have

will the 9th circuit court of appeals be able to move more quickly? eneral of washington -- of course, washington state where this ruling came down from federal district court, is speaking out. here's what he is saying. >> is the executive order in its entirety blocked? and the technical answer to that is no. we only challenged the parts that are actually sort of affecting people immediately, which are the parts about refugees and the parts about targeting these seven countries for not being allowed to enter the country. so technically, we were challenging parts 3 and part 5 of the order. the other parts are things like policy statements, long-term directives to homeland security that do not have immediate impact, so we weren't challenging those rightway. but the parts that were getting so much attention and causing harm to people, stranding them overseas and such, are halted right away. >> so, paul, when we hear that, when he says challenging parts of it, i want to be clear, these are the parts that everybody has been talking about so much. this is re

a three judge panel from the 9th circuit court of appeals ruled just the opposite last week saying thent's authority on immigration has often been reviewed. attorney general paxton filed a friend of the court brief with the 9th circuit court of appeals. the court asked the states of washington and minnesota to file briefs by midday tomorrow arguing whether the case should be reheard by an 11-judge panel or another panel. the texas attorney general is hoping his brief compels the court to do just that. watch. >> this is obviously an issue that affects us. we are a border state. it has an impact on the states. washington and minnesota are probably less affected by this travel ban than we are. >> reporter: paxton is the first attorney general to support president trump's executive order on immigration. at least 18 states have filed briefs opposing the order. the cases brought by washington and minnesota ultimately led the district judge james robart issuing a temporary restraining order against the travel ban. if the 9th circuit decides not to rehear the case, the administration either ha

francisco, a federal appeals court starting to discuss the future of president trump's temporary travel ban. >>> all eyes a san francisco as a three judge panel from the 9th circuit court of appeals listened to oral argument president trump's travel ban. the judges will decide to uphold a restraining order or put the travel ban back in effect while the merits of the order are decided. both sides had 30 minutes to argue. the three judge panel peppered the attorneys starting with the special justice arguing for the trump administration. >> we have been talking about the level the risk acceptable. as soon as we are having that discussion, it should be acknowledged that it is the president that is the official that is charged with making those judgments. >> are you arguing that president's decision in up reviewable. >> yes. >> now there is no set timetable for the 3 judge panel to issue a ruling. however legal experts expected a ruling until the president's travel ban -- until the travel ban will remain suspend. >> for more on the last dramatic hour we are joined by david levine professor at the law school here and you listen to the entire back and forth. what about

all right 9th circuit court of appeals probed both sides of the travel ban executive order. all done over conference call, the three-judge panel asked tough questions of the trump administration lawyers. >> how many federal offenses have we had being committed by people who came in with visas from these countries? >> i could -- >> the ultimate answer was there haven't been any. >> the department of justice argued we need to have a balance in immigration policies that guard against terrorists who want to do americans harm. >> the president struck that balance, the district court's order has upset that balance. >> reporter: the attorney for the states of washington and minnesota says it is the court's responsibility to make sure that the president does not overstep his authority and send the country into the chaos we saw when implementing the travel ban. >> that judicial role has never been more important than today. >> reporter: president donald trump won't back down. >> some things are law. some things are commonsense. this is commonsense. >> isis is trying to do us harm. >>

maria: react continues to the 9th circuit court of appeals decision last week and trump administration response, joining me right now senator lindsey graham. good to have you back to the program. >> thank you. maria: your reaction to donald trump's response, he said, look, i'll see you in court? >> well, he should think about, i believe is issuing another executive order that is modify the. if president really believes we'rwe're at threat, and there s good reason to believe that. he should issue another executive order. but with th the 9 circuit, theyt struck down more than they get upheld. but in a 4-4 supreme court, president should be careful about appealing this order. maria: you think it was a weak response? >> no, i think that president needs to make a good decision for his administration. the country as a whole. if i were him i would issue a new econom executive order makie that green card holders and interpreters are not included on the ban. maria: do you think he wins if it does go to supreme court. >> most likely, the president has a lot of discretion with entering intos coun

9th circuit and doj. thank you so much as we monitor these protests around the country and world. we're also monitoring the 9th circuit court of appeal, where the white house says it's going file an emergency stay against the judge's order at the earl yers possible tile. if and when it's filed, it could go to the supreme court. let's head over to sara sidner in service. back to this judge in washington state. how did this zigs wind up in his courtroom? >> very simply there was a lawsuit that was placed in his courtroom by the attorney general of washington. bob ferguson. he argued on board terms that what president trump did with his travel ban or restrictions was uninstitutional. and should be stopped. and the judge said you know there are some grounds for this and i'm going to put what i call, what they call a temporary restraining order to stay this order. in other words, stopping everything that donald trump was trying to do temporarily in order for the courts to be able to look through this and for both sides to be b able to battle it out. let's listen to what bob ferguson told anderson cooper last night. >> arguments were in tw

appeal this case to the u.s. supreme court or ask all of the judges in the 9th circuit court of appeals to make a ruling. >> edwardthank you very much for that report. >>> to sports. the miami marlins baseball team may be on the block. owner jeffrey lurie has a handshake agreement to sell the franchise to a group that includes a new york real estate developer for $1.6 billion. espn says that developer is charles kushner, the father of white house adviser and president trump's son-in-law jared kushner. the "new york times" reports jared's brother, josh who runs the investment firm thrive capital has been pursuing the marlins for months. lurie bought the marlins in 2002 for $158 million. the commissioner's office must be informed of a potential sale and it hasn't heard directly or indirectly of conversation involving charles kushner yesterday. >> the rumors are he could sell it for $1.6 billion. not a bad return on investment. >>> when we come back, the top stories and a round up of global markets. plus apple already took away our headphones, now they may be kitikit i cutting another cord. this idea i love. it's som

tomorrow, president trump is hammering away at the judiciary, accusing federal judges on the 9th circuit court of appeals of playing politics if they rule against him. a quote, bad high school student would know to decide in his favor, the president said today. and he warned the horrible dangerous and wrong decision to pause his ban could prevent the u.s. from ever having the safety and security to which he said we are entitled. we are all entitled. pretty tough stuff. cnn seechbier white jeff sell any joins me. jeff, for the sake of discussion let's forget for a second whether the president is right in his description of the judges. forget about the merits of his case. the trump administration's own lawyers must be hating that he is personally attacking the intelligence and integrity of the judges who are in the middle of deciding how to issue a rug on his travel ban. >> reporter: jake, privately the lawyers here at the white house and at the justice department i'm told are cringing at those blistering words. now, white house press secretary sean spicer today when asked about the word disgraceful and wh