they have a lot of reasons. there is not really one consensus explanation. quite a few people i spoke to focus on the campaign itself and it was not necessarily one simple way. the campaign was running a sophisticated modern campaign, but not very well. compared with the tightly scripted obama campaign from 2008-12 saying clinton folks didn't have it down so one volunteer i spoke to in iowa said you should not be talking to anyone in favor of the opposing candidates. that was a waste of time, a waste of resources. the suggestion this is not being run well, the campaign organization was incompetent, other people were saying it was plenty sophisticated but they were too blinds on the data. a person in south carolina told me clinton had a lot of people who thought we had so many campaigns telling us what to think, we have data. i heard from a lot of people but they only talk to people on the ground they would know what the problems were and might have caught on to things their data organization were missing in wisconsin, michigan and pennsylvania. they don't say

care a lot rouge putting a thought out there. you can compute in no need to listen can i when are all in the loving to place in mind for planted america at the now motown not a little show here where by now without all that i thought oh yeah marley carlin contra. area where he look at me think it's a guy by i love you not for consequential i don't for a year she know this who conducted. see the dial there to what. what is happening. is a simple only quote that i want to say that we're sorry and we simply seeded percocet coloradoans when i was in all your put ok warn i sincerely i'll do it all today was he not a lot more to much he or they'll have put aside you for you i'll be still comment that i went this week in infinite justice or homicide today is in the field of no problemo so you know landy cannot again come upon the most evil man. henty i can't help thinking and i'm not alone that if this crisis is not resolved quickly politically nicaragua could end up being embroiled in yet another civil war and all appearances he known

only recently, there's been a lot more scrutiny of the law. host: when you say lax enforcement, does that mean they have used this law a dozen times, a hundred times? guest: a lot of people were not necessarily filing on-time. we've seen a lot of attractive filing. -- as retroactive filing lot of retroactive filing. a lot of it went undisclosed for years. host: what is the danger of that? guest: people don't know who is spending and who is behind influencing their opinions and the policies that affect their lives. trish, callingto in from new york on the democratic line. good morning, trish. caller: good morning. say i just don't think any foreign government should have any influence over a political party, whether it's republican or democrat. what it basically boils down to andhe system is so corrupt it's because we've gone so far away from god and his laws and now it is coming to an end. that's why everyone should go to truth.net to find out the real truth about what is going on. thank you. have we seen any movement in congress to tighten up

they have a lot of reasons. [laughter] there is not really one consensus explanation at least when i was talking to them. quite a few people i spoke to focused on the campaign itself. this is not necessarily one simple way. some people said well, the campaign was running a sophisticated modern campaign, but just not very well. they sort of compared it to the tightly scripted obama campaign from 2008 and 2012 in saying the clinton folks just didn't have a quite down. one voluntary spoke with an iowa -- one volunteer i spoke with in iowa said by the beginning of october you should not be talking to anyone who's in favor of the opposing candidates. at their campaign organization ent. some what incompet some people were saying it was sophisticated but they were too reliant on the data. i heard this from quite a few people. a person in south carolina told me that clinton had a lot of people on her campaign who thought they knew everything and were not listening to people on the ground. i heard this from quite a few pe

a lot of people raised their hand. i said ray should you get something in your life would rather forget. everybody raised their hand and that's just a little. he has lots of things would rather forget. for me what school is every time i get it on the page i have no idea what is going to do. >> host: when you start and think about series, all of your books premature are a series come he said you don't want to do the one offs, too much work, do you have a sense of how many you can play out with him or is doesn't just evolve? >> guest: i'm not good at predicting stuff like that. i'm not like jk rowling, there will be seven books in the harry potter series and that's it. for me i've written series that have two, witnesses that have five, written series that lot more than that. for me it's how much gas intake does the character have and i want to keep discovering things about him. i'm excited about writing him or her on the page. if the answers to that is just barely keep going regardless of the book count is. if the edge is

edwin howard armstrong, the a lot of a.m. radio, which, of course, was big in the our's and really starts wireless world, but he's also the inventor of f.m. radio, inch is a huge improvement the 1930's. but it takes him about five years just to get out with his to servehnology consumers. andtarts out and then stops in fact is demolished by a thelocation by regularities, bending to new othersion interests and politics. in fact, edwin howard armstrong, superior radio technologies that they said really wouldn't work, he ends up committing suicide in the early 1950's, as a result of his frustration over his great innovation being throttled. 1960's, finally, in f.m. radio is allowed, liberated, and allowed to with a.m. radio. within a few number of years, it dominates, because of its superior sound quality. highest fidelity. and at the end of the day, you know, if he had lived to see a lothe would have been happier man to see that his great invention got to the market. the tragedy. the inefficiency of the old system. over time, tho

a lot of people don't call it eugenics anymore. we tend to think of these issues of reproduction and genetic technology is about individual choice, rather than a fake, controlled vision of eugenics we saw the first half of the 20th century. i would argue that the questions that eugenicists were asking in 1910 are some of the same questions we are using to talk about things like clothing and designer babies and new genetic technologies that crisper. those kinds of questions are still being mobilized in our modern conversations the ideas don't go away even if we use different names to talk about them. >> and sounds from your last answer it is going to get more complicated because of technology. do you see that these questions and the ethical considerations around them are going to get bigger and bigger for our society? >> i think so, i think it is going to get more complicated because there are still a large portion of our society to think about things and genetic terms. talk about certain ideas in our dna. we often see ideas -- artic

a lot of clinics couldn't do that. you have to have doctors on your have admitting privileges at a local hospital. that sounds like the big deal. turns out, a lot of hospitals don't want doctors who practice abortions because in a lot of communities it is very unpopular. that ended up shutting down a lot of clinics. there has been a lot of litigation about abortion, but it is also on the margin. it is about regulation. justices whoive are antiabortion, then it seems to me the state could go much further to say no abortions after 15 weeks. no abortions for sex election, or down syndrome. there will be much bigger restrictions coming to the court now than in the last few years. >> let's look at what the chair of the senate judiciary committee said. it was about brett kavanaugh's nomination and roe v. wade. right after, we see what assistant minority leader patty murray had to say. >> another attack on judge kavanagh is that he is outspoken to abortion rights. this attack misrepresents his record on the d.c. circuit judge.

>> not a lot of running room. i think that -- let me put it this way, stock prices three, four years from now will be where they are today. lots of ups and downs but i don't think we'll make a lot of progress. i'm not calling for the end of the bull market but i think the best days of the bull market are behind us. neil: all right, you base that on -- there are a lot of people who look at the value of this market and say, you know, historically it's not all that rich, you could make a good run since more than half of the american people are invested in the market, more might be intrigued to do so following this. what do you think? >> three things. one, we can debate valuation, but it's on the high side of fair value. maybe slightly overvalued. it's not like it was in the late 1990s for sure, or 2,000, it's on the high side of fair value. second, the federal reserve is going to be raising rates. the unemployment rate is heading lower because of the fiscal stimulus and the fed is going to have to raise rates. that's

i see a lot of excellent journalism being done. this is a golden age of journalism in a lot of ways "the new york times," "the wall street journal." there is some great journalism being done right now. there is a lot of really excellent journalism being done. often seever, too journalists running into a defensive crouch when president trump calls us the enemy of the course, isch, of ridiculous, acting as if that is the most important story in america. it is not. it is indecent, it should be condemned, but we are not the story. -- often i see journalists twitter is a problem with that, and i am not blameless with this -- when it comes to reacting emotionally and instantaneously. i do not think that helps our cause. i do not think that helps with journalism is supposed to stand for. we make mistakes. we are human beings, but when we make mistakes, we need to acknowledge and correct them. think journalists need to do today is rise to the moment and not i recently wrote a novel and i think some of you have a copy of it. it takes place i

>> we have been making a lot of progress. last quarter, we announced a bunch of improvements. we start their and then when we think about a higher tiered plan , some of the newer features are only available in the highest version,n the business so we focus on making the products as good as possible and then we do a lot on the back into drive conversion, ways to .atch people if you are running the space on a computer, we can show you smart sink and that has driven a lot of the expansion and growth at last couple of years. >> at the same time, you have these cloud giants like amazon and google wanting a bigger piece of the pie. what is dropbox going to continue to do to differentiate? >> for us, competition is not zero-sum. what our customers turn to us to do is to tie it all together. they keep do within their apps, but when you look at the customers, they have everything. is helping them pull them together and so the fact we have partnered with everyone and we help organize content across ecosystems place to our strength. lan

there is a lot of outrage on the streets. ian president is sitting in this tough middle ground. he has been traditionally a moderate. he dresses in the traditional clerical garb, but by historical accounts, he is a moderate, especially compared to the regime that preceded him. he is getting pressure from the conservative clerics who did not like this deal, and getting a lot of heat from pro-western moderates on the left who think he wasted the window they had by not being more aggressive and pushing through economic reforms. carol: $175 billion will be spent to lift citizens out of poverty in china. jason: some of the would-be beneficiaries of this program are questioning be strategy. carol: we got more from our editor. christina: this year alone, the government will spend $170 billion on poverty reduction. jason: this story takes us to a specific place where there has been a transfer of people from rural settings to gleaming, urban settings. that has come with a lot of complications. christina: this little village of about th

i'm also a sister. i'm lots of things. when i show up at work, i'm a eader who's there to build an kxtraordinary business. and i don't thf it as -- it's a female-run business, it's a business that fully expresses the commitment and passion of the people that come to work for us. d the movement that we're building. and so i think the landscape has anged in that having that real seat at the table something that's very important. i represent not only my business experience but also my personal experience. and my, you know, 89% ofe purchasing in this country is done by women. >> right. >> so the idea that women wouldn't have a seat at the table for any consumer business, let alone an business to begin with is kind of crazy. don't think about it as, oh, i'm a woman, therefore. i think i'm tina, and this is my experience. and i don't want to be laned or given an advantage -- to be labed or given andvantage other than skills and passion and what i'm building and executing. >> to experiences you bring it -- >> absolutely. that's be

lot, a lot, a lot. but it was one of those things. all right, now behold. you know what that is? >> what is that? >> cookies and cream. >> oh, they are beautiful. >> yes, so we got to get --. >> all right, all right. we treat the cookies like wine tasting. i don't ever want anybody to bite into a cookie and not get what they want to get. we're training staff because they can look at the cookie and tell if it's wrong. >> oh, here we go. >> you smell it and then you taste it, clean the plat palate with the milk. >> i could be a professional painter because i know how to do this. >> i can tell that it's a really nice shell, that nice crunch. >> but inside. >> oh, my god. so you are going to -- cheat a little bit. i had to give you a heads up on that. >> what's happening tomorrow? these cookies, there's a lot of love in these cookies. i don't know how else to say it. it really just makes me so happy. man, you bake a mean cookie, anthony. >> i know. people really know if they are getting something made with

a lot of eades intentions area as well. as a matter mac costing. controlling who took. place outside the local delivery will be high high lots lots and has has heats request. by one of washington the u. when u. s. president while also actually it'll classified. on the language of this. ticket hundred on has has a unity since the u. s. left social economic structures is hip hop some from brown to release. washington has had one wonders action should be on the on the client. took. back back president's vegemite her tired one wants hold old are just so they don'n't do as well as others on thanks on the in the united states. primarily reason can be helpful say say ninety nine state day and night fall for us. the democrats running. the nation's says jan gentleman over the up and up and socialist. well well to be part of the world and i gotta get despite might make history how is clinton didn't. she was on thosese face pubc public and h home company. thought he remember me. down craters for prince places a state. faith. meanwhile known. a test. russian district strict. i'm a d

there is a lot that's gone into -- as a missionary when e's made a lot of mistakes and perhaps told a lot of untruths, especially in this particular find ion, and the sec may hat he's engaged in market manipulation and securities fraud. the let me start with truth aspect. i have never met elon musk but i talkingnt a lot of time to people who have worked closely with him. up until -- ssured they haven't weighed in on this though hent, is, even can be a very frictional person to work with, they have always the truth.e told so i think that, i'm not signature he did or didn't here, but i think the precedence is, we have to take everything and look at the bigger picture here. the end of the day, he's -- maybe he made a mistake. maybe he didn't. i think they have enough legal how that m, we'll see plays out with the last action lawsuits. i think he's also being for transparency. and maybe that's his learning here, he can't be totally like he was in "the new york times" story, but i do on k we're hyper focused what i think is something that he's a very unique person. ultimately, i think he's

because a lot of these sites are hard to get to. and also a lot of sites are privately owned. so, you know, property owners don't necessarily want people, you know, constantly coming out to their sites to look at these structures. but the property owners have been very helpful and willing to work with me. but at the same time, you know, it's easier to have something that's available online somewhere that you can get to. in total i have done survey work at about 150 sites. about 120 to 130 have been in virginia. i've been focusing on virginia the last couple of years. i found this place through a co-worker and mentor of mine who has -- originally he worked at colonial williamsburg and did documentation through there. now he's an architectural historian and works for a private architectural firm, practice. he knew about the site and told me that it's one that he knew i would want to check out. >> so he's here today. could you tell us what the two of you are going to do? >> yeah, his name is mark winger. this site is special because it has a subfloor pit. a subfloor pit is a hole

quite nice, a lot more choices and things that we can do, but it is going to be a rusty year.ot leaning so much on the central banks. jon: let's talk about em. with the columnist earlier this week, take a look. >> if you are overexposed to turkey, i would reduce exposure. turkey is trying to re-write the playbook for emerging markets. it is trying to go without the trade hikes. it is trying to do it without the imf. that is not impossible but it is hard. jon: he said if you is back in the game, he would be loving what is happening right now because the market is not the differentiating. agree.tally in turkey, they are ignoring the signs in front of them. with the idea of keeping growth alive, so they are not to raising interest rates as fast as they need to. they are not seeking help from the imf. it is hard to think that this is not just one bad case after the other that could cause a contagion. i do not see why they are not reaching got right now. jon: is it still idiosyncratic? >> the fact that these are really large reasons within the em -- argentina was also in the news a

you make a lot of people talk about this question. my wife does some work in this area but it is about pushing decision-making to the lowest level you can comfortably make a decision that was national security is a federal issue but if you've been you've been through the town fans essays generally lot less dysfunctionality because now you are on the local school board but with localism and federalism. but to pass those organizations. and with that sense of tribalism. so that this will actually form community. and that we have a lot alike. but to be misunderstood in this judge that for a lot of people that they can gravitate to those. and it becomes mutually reinforce. and that may be something that was illuminated of the national service. and with those people that are a lot different with you. and one thing that we talked about a generation of young folks. so right after 911. and to say amen to that working with a wide variety of backgrounds and locals and they understand the human being. i am hopeful there is a generation rising that

another thing is a lot of the debts are owed by corporations and banks. the imf is geared toward lending to sovereigns. they would have to come up with a mechanism where they lend to the sovereigns, the sovereign lends to the corporate's. it is not with the imf is designed to do. taylor: we talked with a lot of em investors and they would like to see a $600,000 basis point rate hike to stem the high inflation and they are not. how concerned should we be the independent is from erdogan? peter: it is not independent. something has got to give and we are wondering what it his going to be. orthodoxy,e economic raise rates -- which will cause recession, by the way, which is a bad thing but it is the lesser of two evils possibly. jason: recession versus the financial crisis? peter: yeah, and another is capital controls where you can't put -- take your money out. jason: which erdogan has been to date very reluctant to -- peter: right, because it is an admission of defeat. jason: we talked a lot about turkey so far, but i would love to get a sense of how investors

emily: is it a little bit behind or a lot behind? port shows they deployed over 300,000 new cell sites in the china -- china outspent the u.s. on billions of dollars compared to the u.s. couldn't that gap widen? jeff: they could certainly widen, but we are seeing activity both in asia for development and activity likely benefiting the u.s. it certainly could widen, but i think you also have to mention -- remember qualcomm is in the u.s. and they were a leader in the 4g lte and we see them having a stronghold in big contribution in the u.s. with their chip size as well. emily: this administration is very concerned with china outpacing the u.s. in technology, in particular. how does the trade dispute -- do you think, how will that impact the u.s. versus china 5g race? jeff: if you look specifically for 5g in our business, which is again these high-performance filter chips that operates very high in the spectrum, there are only two competitors in the space. those two competitors reside in the u.s.. whether it is trade tariffs, the world

behold a lot of democratic. gimpel that were meant to have said boy i don't know what i was so i mean. i'm old i'll go won't you a court of showing can walk for you in america latina. a. cement thing it would do what i knew paid all it bought by whole lot really the home we're going to put it here in this a lot but a sweet grass i. put up on the that i decide i carry around iraq and i know it shown we're talking to our elected officials what i want to press here and that they're manipulating that were done to. the president to come productive it will show you i've got to sell it just feel warm but on bravo or number one don't buy bluebird variance on the walk i thought and this it was a thought ok everyone has just received a little boy to provoke in the see you make you you make it or commotion here it doesn't get a good you've got to know literally that an element they said ten years sunday. is one morning i thought i. could last a year and when he got i was going crazy you mchale yes joe all of the mass you my

it will be a lot of work. hired a woman who many of you may know but many of the people in the community know who will be our project manager. is. it will help to have her with us. it's a lot of work. we need someone to move us in the right direction. i'm excited about that. we had our first meeting august 8th and we will continue to meet monthly. we will have some committees working alongside that bigger workgroup. we also just launched residential care for at the elderly group. this is something that the coordinating council has taken on, in part at the request of supervisor he who is really interested in ensuring that there are residential care facility beds in san francisco. as we know a lot of them have disappeared and there is just a whale in the city to make sure that we maintain what we have and hopefully for entice people to grow the number of beds that they have that they're contracting the city for. this is something that we have announced we are very interesting and. we put $1 million into really he

a lot of resilience and a lot of the termination in terms of the community and that would be been doing for the past twelve years. according to the red cross blood services division every two seconds in the united states someone needs a blood transfusion that means thirty six thousand red blood cells seven thousand units of platelets and ten thousand units of plasma needed each day that this week a new discovery by researchers at the university of british columbia presented at the american chemical society could change everything while only type o. blood is universal meaning it can be given to any blood type a and b. type blood contains sugar molecules called it's up until now the challenge has been finding a way to remove those antigens well it turns out the answer was in our guts all along that's right it seems there's an enzyme in our stomach that can break down those sugars and when applied to blood cells removes the antigens even thirty percent better than any other enzyme what this means is that donated blood could be converted into a universal blood type for any patient by using

jason: that is a big question a lot of people are asking. i want to go back to something i mentioned which was a fair point about when companies typically go through this type of process. this is going to depend largely on how much debt if any that musk and has led have to take on. part of what we do in a leveraged buyout, the leverage being debt, is servicing the debt. one big problem with taz luck, both of you know much better than i, is the cash burn. -- has luck, both of you know much better than i, is the cash burn. your point about the sec, a lot of people were tweeting and asking a lot of the questions in our markets live blog as well about whether this was kosher. how much was this planned and how much of this was e line getting sick of the haters and throwing this plan out there? emily: on that note, he closed the blood point saying this has nothing to do with a cumulative control of the company myself. and i about 20% myself have tried to accomplish an outcome where tesla can be free from as much as -- asthma distracting and short-t

a lot of challenges ahead. spoke with a reporter and really got some insight into the starwood sends and why they are not so keen on their program at marriott. patrick: marriott, which is an older company, they were sort of at the beginning of the hotel expansion in the u.s., whose loyalty program was really based on some variation on buy two get one free. you state a certain amount of nights, and you are going to get a free night. taylor: more of a value proposition there. patrick: what they call rewards, or what loyalty wonks call rewards. starwood didn't come around until the 1990's. marriott was always sort of known for a company that was good at executing on the business plan. starwood was always known as a creative company. julie: the integration of these programs two years after the acquisition is finally about to happen. marriott has already made some concessions like the late checkout. you have an anecdote at the end of your story involving an spger who books a lot of travel over the course of the year

a lot of enthusiasm and i want to show you why. mpany that was very popular in the retail sector for a while and it fell off the map for a little bit but the last recorded, it has done get busters. quarter, upent about 13% for its anthropology brand up about 17%. optimism.rowth and what happened as the day went on, shares started to sell up a little bit. 36% this year prior to today but about 152% from last year. this week from last august. it was on a good run. they little profit taking which tends to be the norm for earnings day. it tends to sell into earnings and then it gives us the breath a couple of days later. joe: what are they do because a couple of years ago, the view was that they are totally out of step. early 2016, he revamped inventory controls and expanded overseas, remodeled a lot stored -- a lot of stores and put a lot of emphasis on anthropology, a higher-priced were -- with they the discounting in the markdown, that really help to boost same-store sales growth quarter to quarter that we have seen in the last few t

there a lot of regulations and things can change on a dime.there's a weather event or something happens if the chemistry is different in the water it's hard work. people are well-paid and heroes. they may be in the q. people. >> right in there a number of -- the legal part of this. the attorney general announced criminal and civil investigation into what happened in flint that resulted in charges. a few of them are city workers. a couple of emergency managers and the rest of them employed by the department of health and human services. there are ranges charges the most serious of them involuntary manslaughter related to the legionnaires outbreak in others are smaller crimes. these people have been going through preliminary examinations for a long time. actually in a in at least one case this whole process has been going very slow. we do have a lawyer who is part of the case in the room so he might able to answer more questions about that. the guy in the pink over there. we will come back to it. but does anybody else have any questions? >> it w

there are a lot of high earners who are working a lot of hours, but maybe have a lot of control over whether they would rather work fewer hours. a lot of the folks are most affected by the regulations around how many hours they have to work when overtime kicks in, those tend to be lower wage workers and those people are people who are already working overtime, might be working a second job have someone else in , the family working to earn more money. those are not the people wishing they could work less and are -- work less and earn less. when we asked how much people want to work, relatively speaking, the people earning a lot of money have more choice over how much they work. people who are not earning a lot of money are not the ones wishing they could work fewer hours and earn less. they're the ones trying to work and earn as much as they can. host: that line for displaced workers, (202) 748-8002. rob is on that line. edgewater, maryland. what is your story. caller: i would like to recommend a book called taming the tiger, the struggle to control technology. and another one, the do

of it he built lincoln center he did a lot with the central park but he also destroyed a lot and he destroyed and he cut through neighborhoods particularly poor neighborhoods and avoided the rich neighborhoods and so his movement restructuring a city. you know for better or worse must goes in a point where it needs to restructure and so how do you do those things when you have all the millions and millions of people who have different ideas you have to listen to them and i think the. robert moses was a woman named jane jacobson very much getting community participation but that slows things down a lot and you can understand when there's a need for change why people don't want to engage the community but nevertheless if you don't it doesn't work and so i think it's a very difficult i don't begin to second guess the things that have been. but i wish them well well mr barclay thank you very much farai this conversation has been delightful at first. and i also encourage our viewers to keep it going on our social media pages as for me hope to hear again same place same time here on worlds

turned out they have a lot of reasons. there is not really one consensus explanation, at least when i was talking to them. quite a few peoplefocused on the campaign itself . and this was not necessarily one simple way, some people said the campaign was running a sophisticated modern campaign but just notvery well . they compared it with a very tightly scripted obama campaign in 08 and 12 and saying the clinton folks didn't have a quiet down. one spokesman in iowa said by the beginning of a over you should be talking to anyone who is not an opposing candidate and that's a waste of our time, a waste of resources so suggesting that this is not being run right. that there's campaign organization was somewhat incompetent. other people were saying it was plenty sophisticated and they had a good data organization that they were too reliant on the data . i heard this from quite a few people. a person in south carolina said clinton people in her campaign pumping you everything and they were listening to the people on the ground. her

why shouldn't we be tested a lot more? why shouldn't you find out that your blood or some of your vital signs has a little something just to check out when you have sort of a latent, you know, you got the computer in your pocket right now, why don't you do more of that and have the big data i can come from feeding that into these analytical models and your artificial intelligence systems helping on this and mining the information that is coming in. i'm very excited about, particularly the health and also the personal security. the social networking and connecting, it's also a fantastic revolution that's taking place but it's also hard to figure out. that environment is controversial today are good reasons but it's also very popular for good reasons. it's changing our lives in ways that we want to pay attention to and we have to be smart. every challenge to history that sad -- every advanced through histories have these challenges, but if you look at what some economists call the great enrichment, the economic historians plo

he always had a lot to do. was not a person who would suffer fools and certainly not a person who would waste time? is that accurate? >> that's a very accurate assessment. he was well studied. he understood the issues. he was very astute to what was happening. his passion was national security and the military. that makes sense having been a naval academy pilot. he was passionate to make sure america did not engage in methods he believed were torture. he had bent subject of being tortured during his years captivity. nobody can take away from him the courage that he had when he was given a chance to get out of captivity early because of the status of his far it and grandfather as admirals, he refused. he said no i'm not going to go unless everybody gets to go. how many people would do that. a lot of people would have said i'll do everything i can to get you out, but i'm going to check out of here. but he didn't. he voluntarily stayed with the other pows. he didn't believe he should be treated differently because

that isain, a lot of missing today. even though you have a common able to reach out. >> you alluded to the fact that you were an advocate for reforming mental health services. what got you into that issue? were there any other women in particular that you worked with on that? rep. myrick: i got involved with mental health because we have a granddaughter who is bipolar. fortunately she is fine now. she has been through some horrible years in her life, but now she is fine. because of that, because of dealing with her, i have become a more aware of issue in general on then i saw kay jamison larry king, back when we were dealing with our granddaughter and i was serving here. i called her and said i would like to come talk with you. she was doing a series on mental health with young people. so, i did. she was very gracious to help me. i started getting involved nationally i always admired patrick kennedy. he and i had worked together on this. came out and said -- i have a problem and i've dealt with it. the thing that the ser

and handles these issues he knows that a lot of people did vote for the opposition he has to appear as a president who is working for all the bob inspired a way to unify a divided country especially in urban areas where most people support the main opposition is not going to be easy i can tell you that is not going to be easy especially improving the economy but he says he's the man for the job or the bbs can do now is watching closely to see if he delivers and ultimately all the one does is jobs that they can be able to earn enough money to send to school to buy food for their children and of course the the thing that's also frustrating to some is the moderns is you wake up every day and most people know they have to wait in long lines outside bags because of the cash crisis and when you get to the front of the line you told by the bad manages sorry you spent five hours the line but the cash is right out so you go back home empty handed no money to look after your family people just when the frustrations in this country used to be called the bit the bread basket of southern africa it

a lot of them had to get all these missions but. his was wrong to teach children away from their parents and herd them into a school against their will there was no mother no father figures they put is the big player and we sort of looked after ourselves i don't remember the children's names i'll never forget the courage counted as doc secret on al-jazeera . this is a really fabulous news from one of the best i've ever worked in there is a unique sense of bonding where everybody teams in that's something i feel every time i get on the chair every time i interview someone who are often working round the clock to make sure that we bring events as i crudely as possible to the viewer that's what people expect of us and that's what i think we really do well. they set sail for gold. but discovered their resources worth more than its great human being. driven by commerce enabled through politics and religion executed with brutality. in episode one slavery roots charts the birth and rise of the african slave trade nothing in history that is

differentean a lot of things but ultimately it means creating a program that connects people who are still students with jobs and on-the-job training. you actually need to bring the employer into the education process in partnership with the school in a way that has the student in class part of the time but also on the job for part of the time as well. that is obviously a different model for running education, and for the trump administration and the federal government, it means we have to change the rules for how we test, what our standards are, what certification teachers have to have and where all of the funding goes. all of the funding goes to college. we spend about a hundred $50 billion a year trying to support students in college. $1 billion aram is year supporting cte. host: we will be talking about the future of the american workforce and american workers for about the next 40 minutes on the washington journal. oren cass is with us for that discussion. eastern and central time zones can call in at (202) 748-8000, mountain pacific time zones, , a special line for displaced wo

i had a lot of friends. i was always the one that loved the boys, but they didn't necessarily like me. - why? - i don't know. i think i was a very aggressive child. - ( laughing ) - so it was more your personality? more personality to play. i used to always say, "let's play. boys chase the girls." and then no one would chase me, so i'd have to chase them. you suffered severe sexual abuse as a kid. you know, i did, and it was a female babysitter who was, uh... the bad person in my life, and my parents thought she was the best babysitter ever because she always brought presents. she was always there. but she was-- she molested me, and, yeah, it was very difficult. i remember i used to wish her dead and then she died. she died in a-- on her graduation night, and i thought i killed her. so i couldn't tell my parents that she was doing these things to me, and i couldn't tell her that i killed her. i really thought that i had these magical powers that i-- whatever i thought was going to happen, so... - you had a 25

why shouldn't we be tested a lot more? why should we find out that your blood or vital signs have a little something to check out when you have sort of a late -- you've got the computer in your pocket right now. what i can do a little bit more of that and had the big data that comes from feeding into the analytical models and we've got the artificial intelligence system mining the information coming in. i'm very excited about particularly the personal security. it is a fantastic revolution taking place, but it's also hard to figure out that environment is controversial to date for good reasons, but it's also very popular for good reason and is changing our lives in ways that we want to pay attention to and we have to be smart in every challenge through history has had advancement in these challenges. you look at what some economists commend your drummer koski calls the great enrichment, economic historians point out the graph do we really took off the 1700s, 1800s with the industrial revolution all this comes than in our in

has graded a lot of uncertainty for our industry. and then obviously is section 232 which is something we've never heard of it until probably this year or last year. it's a statue that was created in the 60s and created for national security purposes. it has been used a handful of times. we now see the administration use that fact sheet to impose restrictions. and potentially we may see some restrictions on imported autos and auto parts. it gives you an idea of the various policies that i mentioned. and the magnitude of each action. this investigation has the ability to expose significant amount of products way more then steel and aluminum. in the previous actions on washing machines. it's a big investigation that has potential implications coming forward. the impact that they are having on the economy. and now we are starting to see them and the impact that they are having on businesses and consumers. they all noted the unanticipated additional burden that they were having. even at the domestic company that forced 90% of their steel

so i still have a lot of ties. have an appreciation for the complexity and the importance of everything that you do on a day-to-day basis, so, i really appreciate that and value you what you do for our profession. i'm going to start with a quick story. this is one of my favorite memories from practicing in this segment, goes back to when i was in tulsa and we had a very large governmental client that i was working on and we got into an accounting issue with the client and i needed what i felt like was some support from one of my partners who is now on a board. i contacted him and said, hey, i've got a technical issue with a client and they want to reply to their situation. so he arranged a conference call and jim gets on the phone with me and our client and we start talking through the issues. and the kind of conversation turned to, well, why are you applying the standard in this way? and jim kind of referred them back to, if you go back to the preamable of this standard and kind of read it, here is a spirit of wha

that was a lot more than i could ever teach. it is a pleasure to be here. before i start talking again, who here is unfamiliar with the whole structure of international soccer? just a quick primer. every country in the world to play soccer, there's 211 of them, has the national association that runs their soccer program. then, they all belong to fifa, the international umbrella over all of soccer. and fifa for organizational purposes devised the world into regions. so the catch out with all the scandals going on is the fifa scandal. in one sense it is because it's under the umbrella, but most of the horrendous corruption occurred mostly in south america and north america. obviously, they get their organizational bona fides by being part of fifa. basically all these local entities in all these regional entities have their own competition, marketing and sponsorship rights is where the money comes from. i want to make sure you all have that background. as bert said, this is really, soccer is the gathering story if you will. what fascinated me in reading it if

the election has been over for two years and a lot of history isn't written down. so it's just a way for people to see how unique the institution is. and also just the personal stories that the women give that make things a little bit easier to understand, maybe a little bit more interesting. and then again, just that information that you wouldn't find anyplace else. >> yeah, i agree on all those points, and i would add that going into it, i thought that people might reflect more on individual pieces of legislation, and they do through the interviews. but the thing that really emerged with a lot of these women was just how important it was to grow the number of women in congress so that there was a woman's voice at every table, whether it was leadership or committees and how important that was. and that's a striking thing that almost every one of the interviews touches on. >> thank you very much. >>> sunday we sit down to talk turkiya lowe career. watch that at 7:00 p.m. eastern only on american history tv. >>> sue myrick served in the house of representatives. she

of revenues and did not have a lot of employees and certainly did not have a lot of ways to train them. going all the way back to jefferson they could say okay here from west point we have people that are scientifically trained. remember at a time when most colleges were still training in the classics of latin and greek and rhetoric. so west pointe had the scientific and engineering training that they could do things like survey for roads and railroads and canals. building lighthouses and infrastructure. because they were in the army in essence the government could say we have these guys for national defense but while they are not out fighting and there's a 30 year period where we are not fighting a major war against a conventional adversary during that time there would be a lot of demand and pressure to use them to survey canals and railroads or explore out west. so they did that, especially the 1820s and 30s. during the 30s that started to become a bit of an issue because some people would say the government basically paid this army officer to go survey a railroad on a route that goe

they are working our federal government a lot. a billion dollars is kind of a lot of money. read that somewhere. it's not really clear that there is one system of justice for hillary clinton, the democrats, deep state bureaucrats. the obama white house, they have one system of justice. anyone else, you and me, anyone tied to donald trump, a different system of justice. this republic can't survive with a dual justice system, which brings us to our next critical point. i have been shouting this from the rooftops since may. it we are about to face what i'm calling the most important midterm elections in our lifetime. 76 days from today while the deep state is working around the clock to dig up dirt on anybody anything associated with this president that you elected, the american people, democrats are now planning to use this information to bring articles of impeachment against the president. it doesn't matter that there's no collusion. mark levin was right last night. robert mueller will write an impeachment document. it doesn't matter that the president did nothing wrong and b

i have met a lot of great people. visiting the structures and being inside is different than seeing a picture of them. also the private properties that i am going to, recently i have always discovered things about the building but the property owners are opening up to me and sharing things. for example i went into a fight and the man there has blankets from an enslaved woman. really good conditions. them unless i went out to the site, you know, and spent the time with the property owner and talked to him and that's why he shared them with me, and that's amazing. so to be able to see things like that that i never would have known about or seen because they're not in a museum. they're not anywhere that i would have known about publicly. they're just sitting in someone's private home so that's truly amazing that i'm getting to see things that private property owners have and are willing to share with me. >>> you can learn more about jobie hills' project at her you can use this and other american history tv programs at c-s

this was basically a leather helmet with a lot of brass to it. camouflage cover to cover up the brass on a bright, shiny day. plenty of brass. this would stick out like a sore thumb on a sunny day. depending on what area of germany you were from, this would change. if you are from bavaria, it would be a lion. each different district or area of germany would change the plate on front of their pickelhaub. you also notice i had the same cockades. towards about 1915, leather, like i said, became scarce so they also made another version made out of pressed felt and subdued the plates and the actual pickel, or the spike itself to help camouflage the helmet itself. 1916 they introduced what they referred to as a stahlhelm and made out of 100% steel and more practical in combat. you may notice the vents. this actually allows some air to go into his head to ventilate him so he doesn't pass out from wearing the helmet on a really hot day. and they refer to as a brow plate, extra protection at the front of the helmet which can come down and partially cover