see this as just a missing persons. there's something amiss in this, they make a decision to go into that house to see whether or not someone is there. there are all kinds of things we asked the officer to do and overtime, you are able to add things to your tool belt, so to speak, that gives you ideas of things to try to figure out whether that person is there. >> i guess, i'll take responsibility. i don't think my question was asked as clear as possible. so, in the situation with the officer goes out there and makes the determination that oh, this look like everything is ok here. is there someone, a supervisor, that reviews that decision, someone with more experience to determine hey, maybe we should take a double check here. maybe we should send someone out again? >> not necessarily. sergeant may be there and a officer may have a conversation, but they're not required to have that conversation with a supervisor and -- we respond on so many different things. we can have a officer who responds to a simple assault. we don

but just that i would use it as a personal reference. rtunately some of these things make me sound like dana carving -- carvey. i tried to do it religiously. the would be a gap. i would do it by dictating and subsequently it was transcribed quite a bit later. brian: when you read it, was it on microfilm or was it the actual diary itself? dr. engel: at that point the audiotapes have been lost from the 1970's. all we had from the 1970's were transcripts that had been done. the system is really important. transcripts were done of audiotapes by people back in houston in his office, sometimes a year or two after bush had recorded them in china. remember, bush does not speak chinese and he had had a few drinks. he is trying to describe chinese people he met and have it be transcribed by people who did not speak chinese, trying to imagine what he might have been trying to say. the most fascinating and difficult part of the diary was trying to figure out, who was bush talking about? i think we got most of it. i will tell you a really interesting

a record? >> this person is believed to have a prior record. there's a little bit of confusion about that record, about some of the things that he has in the past, and right now, the nbc news investigative team, we are pouring over the records, and we will be able to, we will be able to get that. and in addition, we have, and we may have a picture of a prior arrest, and white male in the 50s, and we then circled that the around to 56 and now we can name the person as cesar sayoc jr. taken into custody, and this the van belongs to him or something that he drives or in connection to this, the one live on the screen right now, and we will continue to get some more information as to what he is charged with. we should be hopefully getting that in the next hour or so. >> all right. our justice correspondent pete william s williams is also reporting that dna evidence played a role in his arrest. i am going to step aside and andrea mitchell reports starts now. >> thank you, craig. i'm andrea mitchell in washington, and breaking news with the 12 package

a functionary political person, a federalist. he is appointed as justice of the peace, four-year term. he was one of those midnight appointees, and the story goes that the person who had this group to deliver to the white house got waylaid in old town alexandria at a pub. [laughter] sen. harkin: imbibed a little bit too freely and couldn't make it out of bed the next day. never made it to washington. jefferson is sworn in and says to madison, forget about it. don't appoint these people. marbury brought this case to court and said, you have to carry that out, you have to do that. so the case made it up to the supreme court. john marshall is the chief justice. marshall was worried, because jefferson was president, and he is worried that if he tells jefferson that he has to do this, that jefferson and the republican democrat as they were called, might do something to harm the judiciary. marshall wanted to protect the court. on the other hand, he did not want to make the federalists mad, because they might be back in power again prett

they can be a component of a missing person. they can be a well-being check for a couple of youth left in the house and they want someone to check to make sure they're ok. it can run the gamut. as it applies to a missing person, we asked the officers who are responding out to look at the circumstances that are presented to them, in front of them at that time, or information they mayor may have from prior responses to the accident. or information they may have from information they have obtained from individuals. make a reasonable decision that they believe there is an exoden circumstance that they will make it an exogent report or take other actions as they are out there. we rely on them to look at what is in front of them at the time and to make all reasonable efforts to try and locate the person based on the information they have in front of them. we also ask them to converse with their supervisors if they have questions or concerns about whether or not it is a an exceptional circumstance. when it it comes to well-being checks,

personally. some would confide in me with a whisper about a personal experience others had a look in their eyes and i realized this meant a lot to them for reasons they did not want to share but that hearing last week was a moment i have never seen before in american politics since i have been around. i noted the comments about doctor ford. except for a still photograph i have never seen her before she walked into the committee room to testify under oath. i did not know what to expect and she began her testimony. they would describe her condition is fragile she said she was terrified. terrified and why wouldn't she? at this point in her life to become a national person or profile or celebrity? to see her experience her family life turned upside down to take refuge in a secure location some with praise and some with criticism. the kind of thing that even politiciansse are supposed to get used to and never do. and i listen to her testimony and i hear what she had to say why this event took place and i realize at this moment she had a civic duty to come forward before the white house made its final de

as a person could no longer function because they can't remember how to be. or how to think about a problem, it better. you would say the cause is not what's important. it is whether they are cognizant deficiencies to fill in the blank. >> that's right. causing disorientation from inability to understand circumstances have the kind of symptoms we have here. mr. madison can't say the season of the year pity cancer the month of the year, the date of the week. he can't recite the alphabet. >> understand to justice sotomayor's question. if a person simply has without memory of his commission at the capital offense, does that in itself render that person and competent to be executed? >> i think it could. the reason why i qualify it is because they are our circumstances i believe with what we've argued here. >> that's a question that calls for yes or no answer. the only thing that is lacking his memory of the commission of the capital offense. does that in itself render the person incompetent to be executed? >> you would render someone incompetent at the basis for t

but imagine a normal person. i heard what she had to say and i realized this woman in californiale believed she had what she called a civic duty before the white house made its final decision on the choice of the supreme court nominee because she believe she hadnt important information about brett kavanaugh that congress should know. for those who argue she was part of a political conspiracy she didn't know which way to turn so she turned to her local congresswoman and talked about this letter this confidential letter to put in the hands of somebody to make a decision about the future of the supreme court. it was a perfectly reasonable explanation. so when you finally get in contact with the senate judiciary committee with the same confidential letter , making communications with senator feinstein she stressed she wanted this to remain confidential and didn't want her identity to be disclosed for what it would mean to her and her family. i want to say a word about senator feinstein you may quibble or debate or arg

he said you are a smart person and you will be a successful person and i made a mistake, that had such weight for me. it really carried a lot of value for me that he owned that and he apologized. and he said you may do no mistakes. so i am struck by judge kavanaugh and i are both catholics. it's like forgiveness, a biology, grace, all of that, i see none of that. maybe he did not do it. i'm not certain. >> should something that happened at age 17 have these consequences at age 53? >> oh, of course. for those two guys, it was probably a lot, a funny thing, a drunken crazy thing on a night of a bunch of drunken crazy incidents. and for her, it lasted her whole life. and the weight is so different, the funny little thing that you do with your buddy and the you do something else versus her whole life being traumatized by this. i think absolutely it should be something to preclude -- if you haven't done any kind of time or penance in any way, sure, that is something i would say would disqualify for a lot of positions. >> just to push back and give you a quick chance at this one -- as you ju

if a person -- if a person simply is without memory of his commission of the capital offense, does that in itself render that person incompetent to be executed? mr. stevenson: i -- i think it could. but i think the reason why i qualify it is because there aren't circumstances that i believe are consistent with what we've argued here. justice alito: no, i think that's a -- a question that calls for a yes or no answer. if the only thing that is lacking is memory of the commission of the capital offense, does that in itself render the person incompetent to be executed? mr. stevenson: i think it would render someone incompetent if the basis for that inability to remember is medical rather than something else. and here what we've argued is that we are -- justice kagan: in your original question presented, you ask whether a person, a prisoner whose mental disability leaves him without memory. stevenson: that's correct. justice kagan: -- of his commission of the capital offense. so do i take you now to be saying that if you are left without memory of the commission of the capital offense for s

>> someone that does a lot for a community like a brave person. that a lot of people look up to. >> someone who is respected. we could go on. we can pick apart these ideas and get a longer list. i want to tell you something about this, when i am done telling you done about the men of the master class of the old south, they have a few of these characteristics when they talked about honor. they mostly don't they mostly would be horrified and they may be characteristics of someone who is quite dishonorable. the danger is, if you bring our concept of honor and you just study those people that talk about honor and a fight duels, you will never understand the dual. we don't have it. by the time you're done with this class you have to figure out what was there about the dual that fit in with their idea of honor. that is the topic of the class. to understand how they meant something different by honor and i also believe and i will try to show you this, it was related to the fact that they owned other people. it was their notion of honor deeply connected to

i had a personal relationship with president bush. treated me very well and it was the highlight of my career. i always maintained i had a distance, a professional distance. one way i tried to maintain that was whenever i was writing and i found myself saying, i would have the president is going to react to that word or that sentence, i would stop and push myself away from the desk and walk around and say you cannot think about him while you're writing this. you have to think about what you think about him. brian: when does the paperback amount? dr. engel: november 17, 2018. brian: "when the world seemed new: george h.w. bush at the end of the cold war." professor jeffrey engel, thank you for joining us. brian: thanks a lot. which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2018] >> for free transcripts or to give his comments about this program, visit us at q-and -a.org. >> next week on q&a, d.l. university historian joanne freeman on her book "the field of

my thing is that if a person taped a lie about the person then that person's life should be taken and that's what i believe. gerry received training to operate the electric chair and later to administer lethal injections. he became chief executioner in one thousand nine hundred two. i would say my team members take pride in the work that preparations. get in this person brady plays make step in life prepare him just to see if it's for the last time and. a last kiss of his mother sister amy's wife or daughter. all of human badness not like me. and the recognition of that about me was scared because that isn't who i am. if pled not guilty to all thirty counts seventeen punishable by death. the federal prosecutor asked victims if the us should seek the death penalty. i don't know. i don't know. i don't know what justice is. i've got an e-mail. terrorist acts are rare much more common are the murders and other violent acts that happen every day across the united states. in philadelphia shannon schieber was finishing her first year of graduate school. she had been up studying it was early

my thing is that if a person take a life of about a person in that person's life should be taken and that's what i believe. jerry received training to operate the electric chair and later to administer lethal injections. he became chief executioner in one thousand nine hundred two. i would say my team members take pride in that work that preparations. getting this person brady was mixed up with my prepare him just to see as kids for the last time with. a last kiss of his mother sister amy's wife or daughter. and all of human you know in this is one human that had made a mistake. we had to carry out the orders. outside of this team of eight jerry told no one about his work as an executioner not even his wife. to keep it a secret and i kept it a secret from my my family. since one thousand nine hundred seventy seven other executioners across the united states have put over one thousand four hundred sixty people to death it's a punishment that's supposed to be reserved for the worst of the worst. it was a gorgeous day it was a beautiful morning we met some friends and lost and. twenty t

well one way to determine a person's worth is very simple just take a look at that person's paycheck the value of your labor as one key measure of your was some countries define a lower limit on the value of your labor that's the minimum wage but if you end up in prison for example you might end up losing a lot of that value. the inmates at this present are hard at work from seven in the morning until three in the afternoon five days a week. in most german states work is compulsory in prisons. and our time said in germany prison inmates earn one to three year as an hour or that's well below the legal minimum wage it's the same here in this prison but is a system fair or are companies that outsource their manufacturing to prisons exploiting this cheap labor. here at the plame affair at present in lower saxony about two hundred seventy convicted criminals are held serving sentences ranging from months to years. their cells measure just ten square meters. all of the inmates here work. we ask manuel how much he earns. to feed i'm in wage bracket for i get the highest rate in thirteen your

i have a clear picture in my mind with a person with a keg of b beer in their hand slowly pouring it on my pillow, into my mattress. i can't tell you who the other person was with me setting up and returning the furniture to the room. but it's -- sorry. >> if judge kavanaugh in his testimony is implying you have animus toward him because he was closer to another one of your roommates who you had fistfights, fights with, a contentious relationship with, and that has caused you animus and animus toward judge kavanaugh, you say what? >> i think that's absurd. i didn't really care much about the third person. i had an incident with him which made it so that i wasn't interested in socializing with him, but, you know, i had my own social circle and things to do. i wasn't spending a lot of time and energy worrying about him even while i was there. we're 30 something years s afte that now. the idea i would take the sort of social and reputational damage that i'm already taking for this in order to settle a score with a guy 35 years ago who i don't care about, it just make sense. >> more of my

that is a question of intent. did that personin there as part of a broader plan that said once we murder the saudi journalist, we're going to have a body double walk out to have the turks question whether he's alive or not. i have a question of the saudi team, did you intend when you went into that consulate knowing you were going to have a body double. i have a question about intent, we'll never see, did they want to do that from the outset, walk out of the consulate like that. >> they brought a bone saw and a -- look at what kushner said about the crown prince, they're two young guys, jared doesn't know him well or anything, they're just two young people, they're the same age, they like each other. that's kinds of an odd way to describe one of the most powerful people in the his administration and the most powerful person in all-star break. >> yeah, and i pushed kushner about that, i said, it seems like, when you get down to it, you've got this sort of young, american prince you have the saudi arabian prince, they're kind of pa

at this point in her life to become a national person come a national profile, national celebrity coming to see her experience during our family life upside down to the point where she was forced to move out of her home and her family had to take refuge and safety in a secure location, all the attention being paid to her, somed with praise and some with criticism. it's the kind of thing that even politicians are supposed to get used to it never do. imagine an ordinary person. we listen to her testimony and i heard what she had to say about why this event took place. i realize that this woman in california believe she had what she called a civic duty before the white house made its final decision on the choice of a supreme court nominee. she had important information about brett kavanaugh that the president should know, that congress w should know and she didn't know where to turn. she was part of some political conspiracy. she didn't know which way to turn. she ended up turning from the place most went to her local congresswoman, anna eshoo, sitting down with her in california and talkin

far more ineffective than having a person drives a truck or a robot walking obviously. those are powerful amplifiers. it's growing faster. you think about the task described to engineer in the industrial violence where manufacturing complex. but it's starting to grow very rapidly. so it is an exciting place to be because again you are buying the stock circa 1918. it might not have been so good that you had a 90 year run that isn't so bad. artificial intelligence flight are more popular and wall street right now because they have correctly figured out that it's going to grow a lot in its early days and get a lot better and it will get a lot less sort of annoying. right now i think most of us would agree to utility and the value sometimes it works well. they don't work quite as well as they look like yet. as powerful as they are they still are not good enough. but the trajectory is still happening and getting more powerful year-by-year. computing is useful. i don't have to figure out how to install something. if i have to ask a question it is natural and a computer and th

just a good person, a nice guy who was about to get as lucky as a person can in life. that is, lucky in love. with her. >> i found him very attractive and interesting, and he was fun to talk to. >> reporter: her name is angie ver huel. and what happened to angie and justin was that thing that some people don't even think exists. they fell in love at first sight. bingo. just like that. >> and after our third date, i texted my friend and i said, i am pretty sure i am going to marry this guy. >> reporter: wow. he seemed to feel the same way about you. >> yep. it was very easy from day one. we both knew. >> reporter: so they did what people do. they tried out each other's interests. and angie discovered that the man she was in love with also loved things like skydiving. which, of course, he wanted her to do, too. lured you out a time or two? >> yeah. >> reporter: he had you jumping out of an airplane? >> yes. >> reporter: what the heck were you thinking? >> yeah. i'm terrified of heights, so -- >> reporter: so he took you up there? >> yeah. it was so exhilarating, though.

much is being said and it's not taking into account the fullness of his humanity and decency as a person and his record as a judge. >> is he a-political? >> absolutely. i think his 12 years on the court show that. the dispassionate judge or justice sets aside his political beliefs, and there's differences on the constitution, does it protect flag burning or not, and justice stevens says -- >> the world you say is dispassionate, and you are describing what you are saying is 12 years on the bench, but dispassionate is not a word you can use as a what he used in the hearing last week. >> there are different perceptions. i do think that our system is not performing as it should. if what is hanging in the balance is anything other than a retired judicial record that is so exemplary. >> always appreciate the discussions. >> thank you, john. >>> how is this debate over brett kavanaugh affecting voters ahead of the mid-term elections? harry has been crunching the numbers. "there's something about harry," next. talk to your doctor and say yesss! to linzess. yesss! linzess treats adults with ibs w

a week. it's going to take time to get adjusted to society. me personally, when i came home having a place to say and not telling me what to do, just let me find my own path. that's the route that i took. >> other questions. [inaudible] >> thank you. [inaudible] >> any other questions? alright, so if not, please join me in giving bettye and terence a round of applause. please pick up a copy of their book. pick up two copies. raid one, give one to somebody else who needs it. definitely stick around for the whole weekend. we've got some amazing talks coming up. we actually have sunday at noon, a really amazing presentation by mary ann kavanagh of her brand-new book called missing daddy, which is a children's book about incarceration. a children's book about a young girl who goes to visit her father in prison. it's amazing and powerful if you're thinking about these things you definitely want to come back and check these out. at 2:00 with god chandra talpede mohanty and linda carty talking about their book, subfloor. [applause] [inaudible conversations] >> goo

not easy for a person without the necessary money to leave. we have sent buses, -- we are doing a lot of different things to try and remove people. a lot of people are very poor in those areas and it is tough for them to leave. that is one of the problems you are finding, i guess? >> yeah, in some cases what we have to do is ask people on blue sky days who may not have the means or mechanisms to get out of town, to register with emergency management and florida has been robust dealing with that. we do what we can to be able to support the movement of people. when it comes to georgia, we are not evacuated for storm surge. this will be high wind. we are asking people to get within a facility that can withstand the wind and try to shelter in place or seek out public shelters. president trump: when you look at the size and how long it is and the red area basically is the area it will hit heavily. that is a lot of shore. a lot of land. >> it will be all the way down to tampa bay, which floods very easily. to give you an idea of the breadth of the pa

. >> hillary is a dishonest person. if you look at the things she says. they are dishonest. >> i think brennan is a bad guy. if you look at it, a lot of bad things happened under his watch. he's a very bad person. >> and of course, the legendary low iq maxine waters. low iq person. >> it was polarizing under president obama. unbelievably polarized under president obama. >> he'll go to a person holding a sign who gets paid by soros or somebody. >> you heard the president talk about john brennan as a very bad person. last night, brennan had this to say about the pipe bomb addressed to him here at cnn. >> donald trump has not helped to encourage the type of civil discourse and public engagement. his rhetoric too frequently fuels the feelings and sentiments that now are bleeding over into potentially acts of violence. >> the white house did not reach out to president obama or clintons or any of the officials who received the pipe bombs. >> in fairness, the president is not the only politician using overheated rhetoric. conservatives quick to point to comments

a person at sex unless vetted by genetic evidence. hhs is not commenting on an alleged linked proposal but it point out in 2016 a federal judge ruled the obama administration went too far using a broad definition of sex to conclude discrimination based on gender identity was a civil rights violation. that was one of many moves the obama administration made to expand the legal concept of gender and one of many the trump administration is working to roll back. of the rule goes forward it would mark a major shift for transgender rights based on how gender is defined. today they will protest at the white house and activists said the administration is trying to wipe away transgender society altogether. >> the notion that hhs can just wish into being a fantasy world in which transgender people don't exist and decades of law no longer apply to the federal government is not how this works. >> the president said he wants to protect everyone in this latest proposal is just one being looked at. >> a lot of different things happening, transgender,

as a personality, he is adored by the chelsea players because he trusts them. start him against croatia or spain? yes, without a doubt. think you so much forjoining us on sports day. the challenges for dame kelly holmes continue — as she journeys through malawi to raise awareness of child malnutrion. and we'll hear from paralympian ali jawad who is fighting for a change of wada policies. now, tomorrow england's one—day team will begin their five—match series in sri lanka and jos buttler says they are relishing the favourites tag. eoin morgan's side are ranked number one in the world, with sri lanka eighth, and they are just seven months away from a world cup on home soil. however, their preparation has been hampered with heavy rain ahead of the series. time in the middle, some guys say it isa time in the middle, some guys say it is a big thing. some are not too fussed. if you get the practising around those games and you have a good day, we managed to dodge the showers. the guys are feeling good and there is more experience in the side of the guys know their ga

one is a standard missing persons report. one that may have exceptional circumstances or at risk circumstances that play a different role. when someone makes a missing persons report the aid will take the report. they're required to notify the department operations center within a very short period so they will go back to the station and make a immediate notifications. at the department center, the personnel will enter the person into a missing and unidentified person system. if it is required to be entered within two hours if it's not, it's within four hours but we generally enter it within the two hour time period. when there is a report that is not exogent, it is assigned to the station investigative teams so he or she would, over the next 30 day period, take actions to try and identify locations that the person may or may not, contact the family. locate the person and if they do, they would close the missing persons with it with a filing persons report. if they do not locate the person within 30 days, that report then gets

a person like. this if he had left the consulate would he not pick up his fiancee who was waiting for him outside. these childish excuses to not be a responsible state and they did not befit responsible statesmanship. let me. in the meantime security intelligence is and its judicial officers carried out a meticulous investigation and a lot came to light. but at the same time do you see an important saudi official makes the following statement. what we said was it's very clear that this person was killed. but where is the body we asked. that ministers you have to show us the body you first of all claimed that the person had left the consulate so we said where is the evidence to that effect there was no evidence forthcoming. and then there were eighteen people fifteen plus three. then they admitted that eighteen people had been arrested. and of course i found this out that actually from the king of saudi arabia. and a question as follows emerges following these. questions. view these this eight thousan

voice something had just happened publicly in america some would confide in me in a whisper about a personal experience that i realize this meant a lot for reasons they did not want to share but that hearing last week was one i had never seen before. the second thing that i noted was the comments about doctor ford except for a still photograph until she walked into the committee room to testify under oath. as she sat down with testimony. people describe her condition and inmo her own words she said she was terrified. at this point in her life to become a national profile or celebrity to see her experience turn her family life upside down to the point she was forced to move out of her home and her family had to aftake refuge in safety in a secure location all that attention paid some with praise and criticism it is that politicians are supposed to get used to but never do. i heard what she had to say about why this event took place and i realized this woman in california believed a civic duty to come forward before the white house made its final decision on the supreme court nominee. because

person. sometimes it really does not. once a week i will have someone and i will think i know exactly who this person is and at the end of the first sentence, i know i was wrong. i get a strong feeling from people. all the time -- i just had one who i thought, this person, this is ridiculous. this woman comes on, a lawmaker and i instantly liked her. i really got the sense, and i always trust my gut instinct on people, that she was trying to do the right thing and reaching a very different conclusion from mine. she was totally sincere, and i really liked her. i was nice to her. the opposite happens when you think you like someone or agree with the person and you get a sinister, dishonest vibe. brian: here is a famous moment in your life from the actual 2004, date i don't have. you will remember this. it is 17 seconds. tucker: 35. brian you wear a bow tie. :>> i do think you are more fun on your show. you're a bigger stick -- your a did on your show as you are in any show. brian: what was that particular moment like and what was

to escalate death sentences the result was a dramatic increase in executions by one thousand nine hundred nine jerry was putting to death more than one person a month. and a death certificate reads. death by almost. you know don't make sense i don't want to be consider person committed. but that's what every. six to two executions and only kilobit aca was myself and i refused to look into the mirror. he nearly took the life of her washington and couldn't help but wonder if there were others. research now shows that for every nine executions there is one inmate found innocent and exonerated. one out of ten who might have been mistakenly put to death. in a world of big parts of the law and conspiracy it's time to wade to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's taught for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the truth the time is now we're watching closely watching the hawks. you need to lead the audience you need to let people decide what is the relevance of them you don't need to filter the