they think that this is a tactic that will work for them. and they're divided into two groups in the republican conference. the folks who would vote no on raising the debt ceiling, and a larger group that would vote hell no. and the larger debt here, i think speaker boehner knows this ultimately can't prevail. it will do too much damage. because the power to default is the power to destroy. if we have a percent increase that costs the american taxpayers a trillion dollars over ten years, but he has a conference that thinks they have the president right where they want him. that is all this talk about the leverage equation changing. so our position from the outset has to be zero tolerance when it comes to a tactic that says it is a legitimate option for america to default. >> well, congressman peter welch, we'll look anxiously to see if you can convince them they're wrong. thank you for joining us. >>> coming up, the job reminders coming up. the fiscal cliff deal that might have been possible. it was still terrible. up next, what it should hav

they think that this is a tactic that will work for them. and they're divided into two groups in the republican conference. the folks who would vote no on raising the debt ceiling, and a larger group that would vote hell no. and the larger debt here, i think speaker boehner knows this ultimately can't prevail. it will do too much damage. because the power to default is the power to destroy. if we have a percent increase that costs the american taxpayers a trillion dollars over ten years, but he has a conference that thinks they have the president right where they want him. that is all this talk about the leverage equation changing. so our position from the outset has to be zero tolerance when it comes to a tactic that says it is a legitimate option for america to default. >> well, congressman peter welch, we'll look anxiously to see if you can convince them they're wrong. thank you for joining us. >>> coming up, the job reminders coming up. the fiscal cliff deal that might have been possible. it was still terrible. up next, what it should hav

to be able to do, vanished among the population if they want to. >> 2000 prisoners, it is just a tactical retreat. it might not be a fierce as it is now, but it is something i am afraid is here to stay. >> but if you say that they are going to return when they want to, this also suggests that that is when the french and molly troops leave in the future, we could see that as well. >> definitely. although neighboring countries have shown a lot of cooperation by trying to block their borders. but we know that their borders are porous. that there are financial difficulties for these poor countries. so, they can indeed come back and it is a problem. the population might be better prepared to identify and spot them when they tried to regroup. >> what needs to be done to make sure that they do not? >> what needs to be done is to go to the root of the problem. why did they manage to organize themselves in such a way? a development problem and corruption problem, moving around in an area for years, organizing themselves it was a borderline between the military and is long, why did it occur? why di

on one hand, it's a tactical -- looks like a tactical retreat. you guys had set a precedent, you thought, that any time you raised the debt ceiling, it would be $1 for spending cuts for every dollar in debt ceiling raised. that is not what you got this time. and you have put the focus on senate democrats, a political tactic, perhaps a very successful one. but is that really a tactical retreat? >> i don't think so at all, chuck. and i was curious to hear steny's comments about this being a gimmick. 86 democrats supported the bill that we had on the floor yesterday, the no budget, no pay, so clearly they didn't think it was a gimmick. this was a bipartisan effort. look, if you look at the goal, we've got to get our fiscal house in order, we've got to balance the budget, and in order to do that, the senate actually has to produce a budget, which they haven't done in nearly four years. the house has had budgets for each of the last two years that actually get to balance. so what we did, in this bill, is to say to the senate, look, you've got to do a

it was a tactic that he used against some of the most powerful people in the nation at the time. so that question, i went there to try to see what obama would say. i think he said some interesting things about how we need to understand that king was not the movement. in some ways, he is saying, i am not the progressive movement in this country. there has to be something at the level of neighborhoods, institutions, what we used to call the black community. a lot of things have happened in the black community, but is still has some vibrant institutions that need to be revitalized in order to deal with the problems of the 21st century. i think what obama was saying there was a reminder that, even as president, his power is limited. even as martin luther king, his power to control the movement was limited. there were other people out there that he had to deal with. malcolm x, stoically carmichael, all of these people that i knew so well. they did not see themselves as followers of martin luther king. they thought of king as following them because they were in the vanguard of the move

ryan knows it's not a viable tactic. but there's a lot in the republican conference that continue to see this doomsday kind of approach as a viable approach. and i think that cooler heads are starting to prevail on the republican side. and that's a good thing. >> and you are part of this no labels coalition wanting to reach across the aisle. but let me read to you what david brooks wrote. polarization is too deep, special interests are too strong. the negotiators are too rusty. republicans are not going to give up their vision of a low-tax america. democrats are not willing to change the current entitlement programs. so realistically, do you really believe that the next four years are going to be different than the last four years? >> well, you know, i don't have a prediction. i have a job. and my job is to try to solve problems. and the only way ultimately we're going to solve problems is having some common ground and working together. in fact, the fiscal cliff, john boehner did something bold. he violated the rule, he p

we had enough to get by so when they did call an objective meeting or a tactics meeting, we knew what he was talking about. when he was developing an action plan, we understood that, but we could have benefited more and we take this on board, too, to get more people trained up at that next level down. >> from my experience as the exercise, i would agree with everybody here. the first thing we have to do is understand, to understand what the priorities are so the first thing we need is an orientation. not just a map orientation, although that's very helpful, we're not that familiar with san francisco, where the hospitals are, where the priority routes are, but we also need a quick orientation what the priorities are. where is the focus of effort so we can orient ourselves and our capabilities towards that. second thing we need is to understand the intent. what is the priority, where are they and that also keys us to what capabilities we might be able to focus on. of course the third thing we need to know what the resource shortfalls are. that will allow us to determine what kinds of eq

a squad. all the tactics of war. >> each one of these recruits has to be a basically trained marine. we have to give our brothers and sisters in the fleet who are going to be in charge of these marines a finished product. >> i want to prepare people to deal with stress better. if that doesn't work out, to help them to fight through the challenges in the aftermath of stress. >> hi, i'm skip r uizzo. anybody that goes to war is going to be changed. it is just a reality. on the other hand, ptsd is a significant challenge. it's not about being weak. it's about having an experience of stress that really has a neurological impact. >> we've seen now potentially hundreds of thousands of veterans who may be returning from iraq or afghanistan with posttraumatic stress disorder. one in five folks coming home. >> the whole virtual iraq/afghanistan exposure system is a set of scenarios like villages, afghan villages, iraqi villages, city environments resemble middle eastern context and we can pop a user into any of these environmentses that match what their experience was. >> the idea is that you

on the other thing, as a tactical matter, the republicans punting, i think it's a smart thing. you know, i think if they're going to really go to battle on this thing, they've got to get their acts together and have a game plan. because i'm telling you-- >> get their ax-- >> and if we default, this country is going to go through some major, major issues, and government's going to stop working and that's going to affect a lot of people. and we have not been through, when two-thirds of the federal government has shut down. >> adam, adam, this is it, charlie put it it in a nutshell, the scare tactic, that we're obligated to this mountain of debt until it falls on top of us, if that's the only route we have. >> we are, but let me try to put this in perspective. i absolutely agree with you, charles, politicians should be prepared to lose their jobs on major issues. there comes a gut check time. i'm going to do what's right. now, the question is, is this that time? i don't think delays the debt ceiling issue for three months, for punting, which it absolutely is, is the worst thing in

coricidin hbp. >>> one of oakland's newest city council members wants to use a tactic called stop ands tok get guns off the street. >> the councilman wants police to have all tool to stop what is a skyrocketing crime rate. >> counsel member says he wants his police to have all of the tools that are necessary to stop the escalating crime rate. he says he also favors youth curfew, which is controversial but, perhaps more hotly debated, the practice of stop and frisk. the city council member sworn no office, wasting into no time in announcing he supports strategize including stop and frisk in a city in which more than 500 people were shot last year. >> the reality is that i'm trying to save lives. i don't want to make excuses why a child or teenager was shot and killed over the weekend or overnight its become a controversial tactic. last year when ed lee suggested looking at it as a means of getting about guns off the street, angry demonstrators rallied outside city hall. police do have the authority to stop and frisk someone if they have suspicions the person is breaking the law or arme

a. tactic. communists raised the will be able. to step in the stomach getting. the government but you know presumably take the low fees can't expect. us to. college a couple. of. blocks of. the official would like to be slaves sure that she's a slave trying to get this next season it was really a holy day bank bill and it was told mum. was in a particular the lobby a major player was released sat in a. nutshell so explain the street to let. me explain that you can never please. in a snow globe. right now. but what julie's saying based on the sound it seems. to. be a. great place to live next to me in the country to make. up for me everything from old like space twenty one in making the three strikes claim modern day usa even after just a good game in a lot of playing we just go into a whole lot of crammed in a ball the way trying to escape the shower with a hammer to make sure the flow of capital among the street chunks of a place to eat shrimp and their place of pleasure you gotta eat you jack the moment they want to go i'm told it would ship the ocean in the st

we appreciate the fact we can go ahead and enter a tactical command air control. those are operations that are familiar to us and they are, it's a great exercise for us tactically as well. we are able to integrate

it is a tactic of economic mass destruction. it is also ineffective.hey may succeed in using their power to default on the debt and the question for them is whether they'll have the restraint not to use it. but if they do, there is going to be a ferocious market reaction that will pistol whip congress into doing the obligation that america has that's to pay its bills. it is a bad tactic that will do an immense amount of damage and won't succeed. but unfortunately, when i talked to my republican colleagues, they have enormous confidence this is "the leverage they need." >> john: to never be elected again. let me throw you out the number one argument i get from my republican loved ones. what about the argument that president obama himself voted against raising the debt ceiling under president bush when he was a senator back in 2006? >> yeah, he regrets it. he acknowledges that was part of the grandstanding approach. because what both parties have done in the past is use the debt ceiling as an opportunity to basically vilify and castigate the economic pol

we appreciate the fact we can go ahead and enter a tactical command air control. those are operations that are familiar to us and they are, it's a great exercise for us tactically as well. we are able to integrate with cal fire itself with the objective being the fire itself. those work out for us here and we can go ahead and use those skills forward as well. thank you very much, we appreciate the opportunity. >> thank you, i'd like to thank our panelists and open it up to our group for any questions of our panelists today. yes, sir, secretary. >> there are a lot of things you can do in a forest that tend to make it easier it fight a fire like most importantly burning off the fuel during the wet season so there's less for the fire to feed on. to what extent in cal fire and all your other things do you encourage people to do things in their forest when you don't have a fire that make it easier and more effective in fighting the fire? >> it's an excellent question, sir. we spend a large time in cal fire on public education and prevention and also with respect to you

they also made a tactical throw back. if they do not, they will get rolled. >> charles' advice is thoughtful, but when asked if they would accept $10 for $1, everyone said it was unacceptable. we are in a position where we'd like to take tough positions but we do not like to make tough calls. >> i think we will see something inherently different. i think the president is serious when he says he will not negotiate over the debt ceiling. he should not. this is something that is artificial. >> will the new congress make a difference? more women, more latinos, gays and lesbians. or african-americans, asians. will the makeup of congress make a difference? >> if anything, congress is more polarized because of redistricting. this is part of the problem. >> you do not see a ted cruz of texas and elizabeth warren coming to terms over legislation? >> i doubt it. there's another thing here that i just want to mention. the president says he will not negotiate a bar raising the debt ceiling. that is paying the bills we have already inc

tactic of war will. rather such thinking is a recipe he for endless conflicts.are not at war against terror because terror is a state of mind. >> sean: that's one of the people suppose today try to keep people safe from terrorists? joining me now is the former mayor of new york, rudy guiliani and also jihad is a legitimate part of-- >> you listen to the first part. i get it, they're-- i can understand why he would be by islam and the muslim religion, the second part i don't get at all. i mean shall the fact is, all this have nonsense we're not at war against terror. they're at war against us, it's not terror, it's extremists, muslims, who are at war with us. they actually declared war on us, so i don't know how he doesn't get the fact that there's a war going on. what the heck does he think happened in libya a couple of months ago? that's part of their efforts to try to kill us, to try to destroy us. they were at war with us when they attacked us on september 11th. they were at war with us when they killed our ambassador a few months ago. >> sean: here is the wo

a priest of the tactic. general templar also ended this indiscriminate jumble bashing, sending large formations pressing for the jungle in search of insurgents, as the u.s. armed forces would later do in vietnam. instead what he did was to emphasize the gathering of intelligence. he placed the emphasis on expanding special branch, expanding actual intelligence and sending specially trained units with knowledge of where the insurgents were hiding to get their health. even imported headhunters from borneo to act as trackers. but ultimately the general knew that it all came back to the population. he is associated with two very famous sayings. he said, the shooting side of the business is only 25 percent of the trouble. the other 75 percent lies in getting the people of the country behind us. he also said, the answer lies not in pouring more troops into the jungles, but in the hearts and minds of the people. now, that is a very famous phrase which has become iconic and is often misunderstood by hearts and minds

not believe that corporations deserve constitutional rights and now we're willing to use this as a tactic rather than just zoning the factory farm out of our locality we are passing laws that say we as a people deserve the right to local control and we are denying corporations personhood in our locality so so def is doing if they're challenging this idea and hopefully it will be by. every level of government and the will of the people have heard. a friend of mine jonathan freeman. is an attorney and he has a family foundation and so he took the incorporation papers for his family foundation put them in the glove box of his car and for weeks went out and sang with california for weeks one of the. in the high occupancy the h.l.v. lane you know you've got to have at least two people and because the california code the signs say you must have two persons they actually use the word persons and the california code uses the word persons and earlier in the code says for the purpose of this code person means a person or corporation he finally got pulled over by a cop about two weeks ago pulled out

or is occupy a tactic that anybody can use at any moment? would somebody like to -- >> let me add quickly that there was a process within occupy, and they lost control, the particular moment was when the individual tents went up. at the had been able to keep alcohol and drugs out. once the tents went up, they came in, activists were staying up all night in de-escalation teams and we were also seeing the nypd dropping homeless people off to essentially overload the system. and so by the end, at least within new york, i don't know what your experience in boston was that the park didn't work. consensus worked very well. when you have small groups, it worked very well at the beginning. it did not work well with 4,000 people especially with the capacity for a bloc. i went get too caught up in -- movements and i speak as someone who covered them. movements have a kind of mysterious life force of their own. it's always the ruling class that determines the configuration of rebellion or response. the inability of the ruling class or the ruling elite i

though we're unlike any other war at least and in history that i've learned i mean we're fighting a tactic that will always exist there's no end in sight i mean what is the danger of this new mindset of fighting terror. well i said behind me in the houses of parliament just a few days after nine eleven when the house was recalled for the emergency i said i despise osama bin laden the mediæval just savage the difference i said between me and you the rest of you is that i always despised them i despised them when you were giving him guns and money on the moral principle that my enemy's enemy is my friend the enemy at the time of course being the soviet union and the british and the americans brought. into afghanistan in the first place but in the same speech i said if we handle this the wrong way we will create tens of thousands of new bin ladin's and of course underestimated we have created hundreds of thousands maybe millions of new bin ladin's everything that we have done since nine eleven has almost been designed to multiply proliferate terrorism extremism fanaticism around the world and

or is occupy a tactic that anybody can use at any moment? would somebody like to -- >> let me add quickly that there was a process within occupy, and they lost control, the particular moment was when the individual tents went up. at the had been able to keep alcohol and drugs out. once the tents went up, they came in, activists were staying up all night in de-escalation teams and we were also seeing the nypd dropping homeless people off to essentially overload the system. so by the end, at least within new york, i don't know what your experience in boston was that the park didn't workment consensus worked very well. when you have small groups, it worked very well at the beginning. it did not work well with 4,000 people especially with the capacity for a bloc. i went get too caught up in -- movements and i speak as someone who covered them. movements have a kind of mysterious life force of their own. it's always the ruling class that determines the configuration of rebellion or response. the inability of the ruling class or the ruling elite in

couldn't have articulated that better myself man i totally agree sanctions are nothing more than a tactic to go oppressed regimes in a lashing out which of course then that lashing out would be used as a pretext for invasion and like you said it's the population of these countries that suffers in response to our interview with mega upload founder kim dotcom historical records v.l.t. had this to say he said i love this guy he's really intelligent the us government bit off more than they can shoot with the stude he's making them look like complete idiots. that's why i came dot com is also he's just doing his thing and by doing that he's exposing how ridiculous this cross planetary witch hunt is against him on facebook rick tongue. important comment about my ok segment that i was i was watching this about m.l.k. you said many question whether or not the f.b.i. played a role in his assassination the king family has on their website the information about who assassinated him this is from the court transcript quote an answer to the question did lloyd jobbers participate in a conspiracy to do ha

against any building of settlements and a larger percentage in the center i don't see it more as a tactical issue with regard to negotiations with the palestinians that if there is a palestinian partner we can move forward with the palestinians then those people would support abandoning settlements withdrawing from settlements freezing the building of settlements but the public here is very very split pretty much down the middle between those on the left and those on the right right but if we see wins for jewish home at combined with netanyahu his party like you said which is a possibility where does that put him with nets now his i should say plans for settlements where does that put the peace talks with palestine just briefly for us put that into perspective he still he still needs to form a coalition government with at least sixty one seats his own party and the jewish home party will not be enough to form a coalition he will have to then either turn to the center parties or to the ultra-orthodox parties or to both if he brings in any of the center parties that's going to be a moderating

a tactic that is fueled anger among many residents, afraid it will result in racial profiling. in n.new york during bratton's tenure there are 700,000 stop and frisk incidents a year. he blames it on police department that's have been using the practice inappropriately. >> the tools given to work with have you to use them legally. constitutionally. have you to use them compassionately. >> a center piece of the strategy will be the computer crime tracking system he helped develop. enabling brass to track in realtime frequency of crimes how effectively it's handling that louing to mobilize forces to a hot spot and stuff it out before it escalates. >> you can see accountability as to what is going on. >> there is a central part of the policing. >> i met bratton when he was chief of the lapd three years ago. i went down there to do a story. oakland adopted the system a while back. bratton wants the department department to do more witness like new york and l.a. has. he hopes to start as soon as the contract is finalized. >> vic, thank you f you'd like to listen to the conversation j

quarter and then a plunge of defense spending later do you think that was intentional that that wasn't a tactic that they use. well it might have been but you know also our trade deficit got a lot bigger and that subtracted from g.d.p. that is a problem that's only going to get worse and you know think about this we've had a tax increase on everybody here in two thousand and thirteen so americans are going to be paying higher taxes i think we're going to have larger not smaller budget deficits so i think two thousand and twelve might be the high point of the obama term and obama often talked about the lousy economy he inherited from bush well now he's dealing with the lousy economy he inherited from himself and i think whoever succeeds succeeds bush i mean to obama the next president is going to actually inherit a worse economy than eve did in his first term i think the obama recession is going to be much worse than the obama recovery and you know the obama recovery has been the weakest recovery ever you could imagine how bad the recession is going to be that's certainly a scary thought for a l

still get two-thirds and that served as a check on the use of the minority of the filibuster as a tactic of paralyzation. but as the senators from world war ii started to move out of this chamber and as those from the house, who had adopted kind of a ruthless partisanship strategy came to move into this chamber, then we saw that social cohesion break down and we started to see more and more use of the filibuster. i'm going to chart it -- it out for you. i think this first chart probably sums it up pretty well. during the time that lyndon johnson was majority leader for six years, he faced one filibuster. one. harry reid during his six year years -- at the time i made this chart a week or so ago, it was 387. now it's in the 390's. probably going -- well, in two days, i guess we wouldn't have anymore filibusters so we may not break 400. but what a contrast between one when lyndon johnson was majority leader and basically 400 in the six years that harry reid has been majority leader. that's an enormous change. and in addition, normally the objection to a majority vote was done on the final

some worry that bratton's use of stop and frisk, a tactic in which officers pat down anyone suspectedin a recent interview bratton defended the practice. >> for any city to say they don't do stop and frisk, i'm sorry, they don't know what the hell they're talking about. >> reporter: there are certainly some people who say bratton's tough-on-crime techniques are tough-on-minority techniques. >> you know i'm african-american. that's the excuse they always use. if you give the police any additional tools, that's racial profiling. >> reporter: they say it's large lay because the city has cut its police officers from 800 to 600 police officers. >> on any given shift in a city of 400,000 people, there's only 40 officers on our streets to deal with the issues that this city is faced with in california. >> reporter: is that why shootings are so much because the criminals know the police can't get there? >> you're absolutely correct. >> reporter: as well as hiring william bratton, the city council also took a few more steps to put more officers on the streets, but vice mayor reed is looking fo

of them kind of reverberates the same criticism when it comes to drones meaning that just from a tactical standpoint killing a person versus capturing them you lose a slew of information a slew of intelligence so you might be killing the people that are organizing these these attacks right now but you're not necessarily preventing future attacks by gathering the intelligence that these people hold also another point to bring up that critics. have brought up is that anybody over the age of fourteen. i think it is qualifies as a potential militant so anybody in pakistan and afghanistan that is over fourteen is potentially a bad guy and that's not necessarily the case it's just that they fall within the some fortunate age range of their kind of stipulation being that they're male what so offensive when john brennan comes out and says we haven't had any civilian casualties with drone strikes if you're counting every military age male in just a region of a strike zone as a militant and you're not counting them as dead and these double tap methods they haven't mean it's completely outrageous of

so it really has shifted how we're thinking literally from a tactical, just immediately taking care of what's in front of us, to a strategic kind of plan that we can now look at and really do the best for the city. >> so the captain and the colonel, through the discussions that took place yesterday, what are some of the things you learned about relating to civilian issues that will exist and how will you be able to help? ?oo ?a northern california has rich and diverse medical response capabilities. it's impressive the types of capabilities, the

karem: nothing can replace the human being in a tactical environment saying what to do next and why not this and why not that. karem: an airbus 320 with 150 passengers goes into a flock of canadian geese and needing to land... karem: "i can't do it-- i'm going on the hudson." you want to be in a robotic 320 in that situation, or do you want sullenberger to land you? because you can't anticipate everything. narrator: this ability to respond to the unknown may be the final hurdle if drones are ever to fully replace manned planes and start making decisions on their own. karem: i think we're far, but let me say i am the last guy who says impossible. narrator: as human ambition drives innovation forward the only thing that's certain is that the predator and other drones of today are nothing compared with what's to come. ultimately darpa's mission is the creation and prevention of strategic surprise, so if we are successful, we will all be surprised. chad: historically you look at when the wright brothers first flew in 1903. a hundred years later, we are actively flying remotely piloted aircr