excuse me i had a question when it went a.b.c. long and they're rewarding when n.b.c. lies in their reporting they're not they're not held to this accountability standard that you're applying to private citizens why is that. well i mean. are there. laws it's practice journalism no no no no no look here's the thing about. the whole citizens united and super pacs we have to see this in the historical context of the destruction of the fairness doctrine in one nine hundred eighty seven by the reagan administration there are another. public airwaves they are public in the interest to regulate the public airwaves to have a healthy democracy and by these corporations and wealthy individuals being able to funnel in tens of millions of dollars they are controlling the public airwaves and now what it has to do is. of opinion it's not about that you can spend hours or days maybe finding a dissenting opinion it's what people are bombarded with every day that's why they start to believe that global warming is a fraud even though the evidence is. there they. are ever found. again an

excuse me i had a question when it went a.b.c. long rewarding when n.b.c. lies in their reporting they're not they're not held to this accountability standard that you're applying to private citizens why is that. i mean. is they are they're just they know they have no laws it's practice journalism no no no no look you know here's the thing about the whole citizens united and super pacs we have to see this in the historical context of the destruction of the fairness doctrine in one nine hundred eighty seven by the reagan administration there was.

excuse me i had a question when it went a.b.c. long. when n.b.c. lies in their reporting they're not they're not held to this accountability standard that you're applying to private citizens why is that. i mean he is they are their case they have no laws it's practice journalism and i don't no no no no look at here so here's the thing about the whole citizens united and super pacs we have to see this in the historical context the.

current internet meme rick santorum added another radical position to his long list of radical positions in an interview with a.b.c. news yesterday santorum pushed back against a nearly fifty year old supreme court ruling and said the states should have the right to arrest you for having or using a condom even if you're married and using it in your own home. are in their view out of the mainstream and they talk about the griswold versus connecticut case that was an issue that casey used against you about whether or not a state has the right to make a law against a married couple using contraceptives is that something you're at all concerned about is has a right never questioned the citizenry that's right if rick santorum were dictator he'd let states ban contraceptives no more condoms in kentucky no more birth control in alabama back in october santorum railed against contraceptives saying one of the things i will talk about that no president has talked about before is i think the dangers of contraception in this country it's not ok it's a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are su