us peace and security of an unexpected nature of the time for the last nearly three decades the a.b.m. treaty was abrogated by the us in two thousand and two russia effectively pulled out of the c.f.c. the conventional forces treaty in twenty six again now the u.s. is pulling out of the i.n.f. treaty and the strategic arms reduction treaty only last until twenty twenty one and currently there are no talks to prolong it so the architecture as a whole is in serious difficulty and that's where we should be directing attention towards rebuilding those achievements so when you hear the u.s. say it will increase its nuclear capacity unless quote other countries come to their senses. to say that sort of is a double edged sword of threat but also say a sort of come on let's talk about this. i think it may be meant that way but i do think that at least some of the countries in which that stare acted will sestak will see the threatening side rather than they kind of the more the more peaceful side to it. in one nine hundred seventy the late one nine hundred seventy nine nato took the decision to bring

the a.b.m. treaty and this was. disrupted a lot because for russia they really needed to. develop a new a new weapons as well because for the west or for nato they keep saying that the a.b.m. treaty and other. missile defense shield are building is simply to you know intercept this non-existent missiles from iran but it's. become more evident this targeting russia russian these are countered somehow but also this is an interceptor missiles can be converted into this intermediate range nuclear missiles so they can actually be used to target russia so russia already warned us market point out all of it in two thousand and seven put in that. treaty would have to be reconsidered because they can't live with it anymore because the with the senator what is this other believing these are controlled agreements. is that. mean we're going to have a new arms race believe that inclusion here means where it is now which would preferable near where i want to have something war us we're going to have caves because let me remind our viewers what that i never treaty is it was signed in the

russia putin announced the three doomsday weapons which were response to the us withdraw from the a.b.m. treaty you know russian the us are already modernizing their nuclear arsenals and engaging in reckless rhetoric where they're talking up the utility in the use of nuclear weapons and that is hugely hugely dangerous for global security especially when there are huge there's a huge risk of mis perhaps perception between the two countries miscalculation are these are new risks that we didn't have in the in the coal cold war and this is hugely dangerous let's bring it to me to go it here in moscow it's hugely dangerous says let's all down than in london however is it time for your own security sake for moscow's for russia's security sake to put nuclear weapons back into poland is that something that the i.n.f. treaty if the u.s. pulls out is going to happen. well russia has already just sad that we will do our best to preserve the treaty we have been a billion to the united states to the european union to everyone let's preserve the treaty but if the situation gets really dangerous than a spokes

had used to reinstate the a.b.m. treaty and we walked out of this treaty that we had since nineteen seventy two with the soviet union that allowed us to to ratchet down limits missile by live putting missiles we put them in the main year and also now they going into poland we expanded nato i mean i think i mean american there i think one country has been they had acted but i would urge russia not to do what we need to do i mean you have enough nuclear weapons even if you know build in the newborn's i mean why doesn't russia and china are in some maybe india getting care that puts the u.s. in moving out of its supreme. position as we only had just been on the planet after world war two alison why is alice what you know if we go back to this particular treaty why call trying to negotiate a new deal with the current one in place because that could take years couldn't it . yeah but the current situation in the united states we have what president eisenhower warned about the military industrial i now call it military industrial

when the bush administration bush cheney administration pulled out of the a.b.m. treaty and in fact there was a huge consequence russian found a.b.m. missiles being put in remain and threatening it with the threat of a first strike that they might not be able to retaliate against and so russia responded as i read by developing the same person on a cruise missiles which are what has the u.s. upset so and so bolton is wrong. violence and a shocking incident in a metro station in rome mog tuesday evenings champions league football match between a us robot and moscow. i hear. a collapsing escalator in the metro left dozens injured also one russian fan was involved in a fight outside the stadium after the match. that sports correspondent i'd like you to check the joint column bray in the studio with the. really bad night for c.s.k. moscow in rome this time not only their team lost three nil to as roma big defeat but also to a very bad incidents for the fans first of all the fight outside the study only because stadium the roma stadium. there were reports that one of the c.s.k

when the bush administration bush cheney administration pulled out of the a.b.m. treaty and in fact it was a huge consequence russia found maybe a a.b.m. missiles being put in remain and threatening it with the threat of a first strike that they might not be able to retaliate against and so russia responded as i read by developing the same person on a cruise missiles which are what has the u.s. upset so and so bolton destroying. the evenings champions league football match between a robot and sasco moscow was maad by an accident involving fans in a row metro station. incident happened just before the match collapsing escalator on the metro left some thirty people injured the mayor of rome has expressed sympathies to those affected the firefighter chief at the scene says the colts of the escalator my function is on. earth you must investigate this is a strange thing we need to fully understand what. causes are by looking at the c.c.t.v. recordings there is some pictures here you can see a breakdown and there there was undoubtedly a failure it seems that fans were jumping

when the bush administration bush cheney administration pulled out of the a.b.m. treaty and in fact it was a huge consequence russia found maybe a a.b.m. missiles being put in remaining and threatening it with the threat of a first strike that they might not be able to retaliate against and so russia responded. as i read by developing the same person on a cruise missiles which are what has the u.s. upset so and so bolton is wrong. about another news last night champions league football match between i asked for a mounting a scam or sky was mobbed by an accident involving fans never met tri-state still. are not going to do evil as there were a lot of people there the escalator accelerated and people couldn't get off of it people were trying to jump over each other so many fell enjoy themselves. the instant that it happened just before the match a collapsing escalator in the metro left twenty four people injured the mayor of rome commented on the incident so you saying that some witnesses had seen fans dancing and jumping on the escalator sure expressed a sympathy that tho

we're going to pull out while donald trump does have someone to learn from i have concluded the a.b.m. treaty hinders our government's ability to develop ways. to protect our people from future terrorists or rogue state missile attacks the united states of america. is withdrawing from this almost thirty year old treaty. at the turn of the century george w. bush pulled out of a nine hundred seventy two pact designed to put the brakes on both countries from constantly outdoing each other's nuclear forces freed from the shackles of the treaty washington announced the deployment of a missile defense system in europe and there's no better symbol of our desire to work for peace and security than working on a missile defense system a missile defense system that would provide. security for europe for russia having new nukes right on its doorstep posed a new security threat plans to expand certain elements of the missile defense system to europe cannot help but disturb us who needs the next step would be in this case and inevitable arms race the us missile shield started operating in romania twenty si

when the bush administration bush cheney administration pulled out of the a.b.m. treaty and in fact it was a huge consequence russia. a.b.m. missiles being put in rimini and threatening it with the threat. first strike that they might not be able to retaliate against and so russia responded as i read by developing the same person on a cruise missiles which are what has the us upset so so bolton is wrong. to say you can ings champions league football match between a and c. moscow was maad by an accident involving fans though in a rome metro station. you . look at it you feel as if there were a lot of people there the escalator accelerated and people couldn't get off of it people were trying to jump over each other many fell and injured themselves. well the incident happened just before the match collapsing escalator on the metro left twenty four injured and the mayor of rome commented on the incident saying that some witnesses had seen fans and dancing and jumping on the escalator he also expressed sympathy for those affected by the firefighting chief at the scene says th

treaty alife the same way americans were not interested in keeping the a.b.m. treaty fifteen years earlier they do not need any longer any agreements in the field of strategic armaments and intermedia missiles and all that stuff because that would create equal opportunities equal circumstances for each party involved in a certain agreement and this is what they would not like to accept any longer the or they are seeking the unilateral military advantage they want to be the only power in the world. takes decisions what is good in the waters bit who is guilty and who is innocent to judge and to punish other countries and for that they do not need these type of agreements unfortunately but what does russia want to see here at the end of the day that agreement was drawn up thirty years ago china was very much on the scene then is a worry could this could some better agreement come out of all this maybe with this meeting today. well everything is possible and nothing if there is perfect in the rules and these. i believe should be amended and recalled that mr putin of the p

russia putin announced the three doomsday weapons which were response to the us withdraw from the a.b.m. treaty you know russian the us are already modernizing their nuclear arsenals and engaging in reckless rhetoric where they're talking up the utility in the use of nuclear weapons and that is hugely hugely dangerous for global security especially when there are huge there's a huge risk of mis perhaps a perception between the two countries miscalculation are these are new risks that we didn't have in the in the coal cold war and this is hugely dangerous let's bring in dimitri go in moscow it's hugely dangerous as muscle down than in london however is it time for your own security sake for moscow's for russia's security sake to put nuclear weapons back into poland is that something that the i.n.f. treaty if the u.s. pulls out is going to happen. well russia has already said that we will do our best to preserve the treaty we have been appealing to the united states to the european union to everyone let's preserve the treaty but if the situation gets really dangerous than aspersion said recently

when the bush administration bush cheney administration pulled out of the a.b.m. treaty and in fact it was a huge consequence russia found a.b.m. missiles being put in rimini and threatening it with the threat of a first strike that they might not be able to retaliate against and so russia responded. as i read by developing the same person on a cruise missiles which are what has the u.s. upset so and so bolton is wrong on. what i'm trying to pass to have toughened his stance on saudi arabia over the killing of generalists jamal khashoggi in the kingdom's istanbul consulate speaking gave the oval office on tuesday the u.s. slated to live at his house just what i've seen yet but stopped short of committing to punish syria. there are very bored. original concept. it was carried out poorly at the cover up was one of the worst in the history of cover ups first a. bad deal should have never been thought of. somebody really messed up. and that the worst cover up ever. and where it should have stuck is at the deal standpoint when they thought about it because whoever thought of

russia putin announced the three doomsday weapons which were response to the us withdraw from the a.b.m. treaty you know russian the us are already modernizing their nuclear arsenals and engaging in reckless rhetoric where they're talking up the utility in the use of nuclear weapons and that is hugely hugely dangerous for global security especially when there are huge there's a huge risk of mis perhaps perception between the two countries miscalculation are these a new risks that we didn't have in the in the coal cold war and this is hugely dangerous let's bring it to me to go in moscow it's hugely dangerous says don't than in london however is it time for your own security sake for moscow's for russia's security sake to put nuclear weapons back into poland is that something that the i.n.f. treaty if the u.s. pulls out is going to happen. well russia has already just sad that we will do our best to preserve the treaty we have been appealing to the united states to the european union to everyone let's preserve the treaty but if the situation gets really dangerous than a spokesman said recently w

and let's not forget his precedent for this is well george bush we three united states from the a.b.m. treaty anti-ballistic missile treaty a decade or so ago and again that was why i. believe to be really could've bought upon a new nuclear arms race which is what this is about i mean donald trump of course we know he's a negotiation style we know that he makes these dramatic gestures and then backpedal us in an effort to see perhaps get some new deal under way and it looks like he's perhaps even do not with iran of course he's tried it with korea with some degrees of success and it might be another example here that's particular case of course because some in america have some justifiable i think concerns that china for example is not covered by this pact this treaty and of course china even though there's no evidence that it has so far developed such weapons of course to develop such a base weapons that would perhaps threaten in america's few perhaps american bases in the region america wouldn't under this treaty be able to actually construct its own weapons to counter that or at least to o

s with when we walked out of the a.b.m. treaty russia never kept complaining we never did a thing that it well but russian so there would be consequences and i think we're going to see that you know ted it seems to me you know with the advent of arms control agreements in the late sixty's all the way up to one gets a few days ago that was a nonpartisan issue they were almost like sacred cows that you really don't touch and it seems very quickly now the entire architecture of arms control and nonproliferation is it's turning into tatters in front of our eyes go ahead. thank you peter i would say having twenty six years of experience as an american diplomat most of that concerned with arms control with nonproliferation with the elimination of entire classes of weapons that what alice is talking about is the real danger in the real challenge here we're looking at a world where arms control may not be enough we're looking at a need for declaring first that nuclear weapons are unlawful and having all of the powers sign on to that and t

when the bush administration bush cheney administration pulled out of the a.b.m. treaty and in fact there was a huge consequence russia found maybe a a.b.m. missiles being put in remaining and threatening it with the threat of a for strike that they might not be able to retaliate against and so russia responded as i read by developing these cyprus on a cruise missiles which are what has the u.s. upset so there has been a huge consequence of the risk decision to pull out of the one thousand nine hundred seventy two nuclear treaty that had been negotiated by richard nixon hardly someone who would be accused of being soft on the soviet union so so bolton is wrong and and then the third thing i would say is that bolton has been arguing for pulling out of in our for for years and he's written about it is early and i saw it as two thousand and eleven so to say that russia is violating the treaty as the reason for pulling out is. is somewhat dishonest since it's something that will miss been pushing for long before any of the supposedly elations when w.'s talked to reporters ea

deliver news of the bush administration's decision to withdraw from the a.b.m. treaty but his message was that i am. against the facts that that's the nuts that. he wouldn't. look at us but i guess and she has since it would have to if she had a. i've even seen if you suggest that we could see this is in the step that is the go to puppet i also want to thank jon huntsman and his team they are doing a fantastic job here in moscow under very difficult circumstances limited personnel in very trying environment and they have us descend on them with all of the needs and requirements really puts a strain on the embassy so we're very grateful to him and everybody who pitched in to get that national look at that is bus alleging a concern that the form how much you can put up with make up a source that and he said what the which is lost in the cups that just took so let me get this on the deal it's a solution in the. what you could or should what they're. not sure it is if you think it's not then that's just looking to see if i'm not in the market on the form we should reach an

when the bush administration bush cheney administration pulled out of the a.b.m. treaty and in fact it was a huge consequence russia found abia a.b.m. missiles being put in remain and threatening it with the threat of a first strike that they might not. able to retaliate against and so russia responded. as i read by developing the same percent of cruise missiles which what has the us upset so so bolton is wrong. on trying to pass to have toughened his stance on the killing of journalist jamal khashoggi in the kingdom's istanbul confluent i was speaking in the oval office on tuesday the u.s. need to deliver his harshest words yet but stopped short of committing to punish riyad. original concept. it was carried out poorly and the cover up was one of the worst in the history of cover ups first a. bad deal should have never been thought of. somebody really messed up. and they had the worst cover up ever. and we're shouldst it is at the deal standpoint when they thought about it because whoever thought of that idea. i think is in big trouble and they should be in big trouble

bush pulled out of the a.b.m. treaty in two thousand and one or in two thousand and two when the from they pulled out he calls for he's opposed to extending the new start treaty in two thousand and eleven even before the accusations about the russians cheating on the i.n.f. treaty he called for abrogating the i.m.f. treaty the fact that bolton of all people is the one who's actually conducting these discussions is very very serious and we know the bolton strongly influenced trump's decision to abrogate the i.n.f. treaty but what do you think donald trump's final goal in this then is because at every opportunity gets he wants to talk about complete nuclear disarmament he said for the past few years whenever he gets the opportunity it's his big number one priority so what's the thinking here because president obama was convinced out of not dropping out of this treaty but donald trump is and yet he's the one ofa nuclear disarmament apparently. but you don't take calls for nuclear disarmament at face value from every side of

missiles installing them in europe and it's very scary prospect so i think bad things happen when the a.b.m. treaty was abandoned this is probably worse. it's. this is ronald reagan's last great achievement these people are always praising ronald reagan but now they just tossed him overboard and his his his final great achievement with prime minister gorbachev so it's it's a terrible thing bolton of course is a neo con but the neo cons are warmongers they long advocated a first strike against the soviet union many of them advocated for a strike against russia so is this what this is about to make a first strike. easier for the u.s. to bring about. i hope to goodness not no question it's going to bring about on our own an increased arms race so the russia's going to us is going to build many many more nucular into missiles i guess russia will too it's just horrendous. will a meeting between mr putin mr trump make any difference i don't think so i don't know is trump his own man i my my guess is he's not he's there for other forces controlling him i mean with with that in mind joe bolton claimed earl

with no treaty in place if this one is now biting the dust and if the a.b.m. treaty pulled out of fifteen years ago also what's going to happen next is it's going to shift the balance of power in europe likely to see more missiles being stationed in it. well you know i mean i think. that relies on a lot of other other situations you know we have we have some instability happening with saudi arabia and a lot of the news that's coming out of genuine ricky's involvement knowledge and knowing what's what's going on in a lot of discussion about what that means for for relationships with iran you know i think at this point the main concern is why you know what are the real reasons for pulling out of out of so what does this mean for for america going forward in trying to be a peaceful nation that brings people together i think it will create a lot of tension a lot of discussion at international levels but i do think the world will continue to turn it just might start to start to look a little bit more dangerous how is it anything that other international organizations coul

russia putin announced the three doomsday weapons which were response to the us withdraw from the a.b.m. treaty you know russian the us are already modernizing their nuclear arsenals and engaging in reckless rhetoric where they're talking up the utility in the use of nuclear weapons and that is hugely hugely dangerous for global security especially when there are huge there's a huge risk of mis perhaps perception between the two countries miscalculation are these a new risks that we didn't have in the in the coal cold war and this is hugely dangerous let's bring in dimitri go in moscow it's hugely dangerous says let's all down than in london however is it time for your own security sake for moscow's for russia's security sake to put nuclear weapons back into poland is that something that the i.n.f. treaty if the u.s. pulls out is going to happen. well russia has already just sad that we will do our best to preserve the treaty we have been a billion to the united states to the european union to everyone let's preserve the treaty but if the situation gets really dangerous than a spokesman said re

a.b.m. the antiballistic missile treaty everyone was worried that would be some kind of collapse of global security sat well that didn't happen and he promised that didn't it wouldn't happen again when the united states would pull out of the i am after. seven thousand people escaping poverty and violence in three. central american countries are defying donald trump by continuing them off towards the u.s. border currently heading north through mexico u.s. active state might pompei it says the caravan poses a danger and there's a warning and is warning the migrants to turn back from a security standpoint there is no proper accounting of who these individuals in the caravan are and this poses an unacceptable security rest to the united states moreover many of these people are right targets for human traffickers and others who would exploited them we don't want that to happen you know it's also has a message for those who are currently part of this caravan for any caravan which follows you will not be successful getting into the united states illegally no matter what i repeat the caribbean will not cro

a.b.m. the antiballistic missile treaty everyone was worried there would be some kind of collapse of global securities sat well that didn't happen and he promised that didn't it wouldn't happen again when the united states would pull out of the i.m.f. . the united nations says millions more people in yemen are facing famine than previously thought the u.n. humanitarian chief is giving the security council an update on the situation there mark local says the three year conflict has left some fourteen million people on the brink of famine and completely reliant on. just to be clear my assessment my advice to you is that there is now a clear and present danger of an imminent and great big famine engulfing yemen much bigger than anything any professional in this field has seen during their working lives our revised assessment the results of a new survey work an analysis is that the total number of people facing pre-fab in conditions meaning they're entirely reliant on external aid for survival could soon reach not eleven million but fourteen million that's hard for the total population of the c