> what's the difference between the ar part and pro diedictable >> it is a unique application of a.i. a.i. has the last amount of technology to understand language and understand pictures and make sense. >> the software bots that go into the bad guy bots go into twitter and facebook. facebook is having a devil of a time trying to get rid of those things. here is the problem, not your bots but bots in general are going to get better and better and better to the point the bots are saying man, did you see last night's warrior's game with steph curry? meanwhile, there is a human would say that's probably human because he's talking about the game. can bots get to the point where facebook and twitter will not be able to detect who is real and who is not? >> i think if you recall the old days of programs, how did we take care of it? we wrote another program that was virus and stopped them. as bad bots come, it's too hard for people to watch them. so the good bots watch the bad bots. >> the next company might be the anti bot. >> thank you. >> thank you. >>> a hard look at silicon valley when "pre

a.i. developers would mean. what does it take to insure that a.i. will do no harm? what does it take to train a new generation of people so that they can work on a.ith that kind of commitment and principle in mind? and one should never think that this is just a question that is going to need to be thought about by people who happen to work at some large tech companies. because given where a.i. is going -- especially given the kind of approach that we're taking as a company finish it's all about insuring that anybody can build an a.i. solution. we're creating building blocks. the vision building blocks, the speech building blocks and the like so that other people -- companies, governments, universities, individuals -- can take them and create their own a.i. solutions. it's a wonderful thing, but it means that a.i. ethics are not just for a few people, they're for almost every part of society. if we're going to reremain true to what -- remain true to what i think we would typically say are timeless values, we also need to recognize one other question; do we want only ethical people to behave ethically, or would we like everyone to behave ethically?

a.i. topped the list of trends that bodies -- would disrupt business over the next several years. a.i. has creeped into everyday lives like a.ient. yesterday will smith posted a video about a date with a life like creation, sophia. watch this. >.>> you're so easy to talk to. you've got a clear head, literally. ♪ >> i think we can be friends. let's hang out and get to know each other for a little while. you're on my friend's list now. >> yeah, i read that wrong. >> dagen: i think that there's an entire movie in that. joining me now is a chief technology officer, author of the new book "human plus machine, reimagining work in the age of a.i.," paul daugherty. how will artificial intelligence change all business in th next w years? >> it's interesting you started with sophia. i kicked off a conference we hosted two weeks ago and sophiea was my co-host. she said she liked my job and was coming for my job next. the reason we wrote the book was we found there wasn't great guidance out there for business leaders on how to apply a a.i. to their business and we believe we're an innovation economy. companies are competing based on inno

a.i. will really help and are there areas where you would say a.i. should be walled off as it gets closer to human intelligence, we shouldn't let it have thoughts or make decisions about a certain group of things. >> yeah. i think the current boom in a.iou can really reason about as a decrease in the price of prediction. a.i. is a tool that's made prediction a lot cheaper and you can use all your practice ditra tools of economic naanalysis to think about that people, because the price is lower, people will use prediction in places where they didn't used to you can now afford to put a speech predictor on your phone that guesses what you are saying so siri can listen to you. that's the current era of a.i., the decrease in the price of prediction the future of a.i. is about robots and decrease in the price of labor, specifically dangerous labor. that sort of factory work and packaging, that kind of stuff. that's really where we live. we are focused on building robots that can do jobs in factories that are too dangerous or expensive to have robots do the last part of your question, what should we wall off, i really think autonomous weapons are among the world's worst ideas, dumbest ideas the problem with them is if you have an autonomous

a.i. robotics you recognize this tariff story is much more than just aluminum and steel. >> absolutely. >> nafta, china. >> 80 is absolutely more important, because the way chinese economy is going, you talk about a.i., you know, chinese are now the leaders in quantum communications quantum computing, they put a lot of state money in a.iknows what is going to happen we don't have that project of let's go the moon john kennedy, we may need one of those projects for a.i. and quantum, because they control those, you control a lot in tomorrow's world. maria: thank you, latest there coming up a leadership shake-up andrew liveris about officials requires from. dagen: chemical details on replacement at dow dupont next. you know what goes here... and your approval rating... goes here. test drive the ztrak z540r at your john deere dealer and learn why it's not how fast you mow, it's how well you mow fast. nothing runs like a deere. save 250 dollars when you test drive and buy a john deere residential z540r ztrak mower. maria: breaking news a plane crash in nepal kills at least 38 onboard cheryl casone with details. cheryl: that death toll may rise, we are getting some details about the crash, it was a twin propeller passenger plane from bangladesh crashed at kathmandu international airport 67 onboard four crew members official

a.i. are make are our live -- we're about to see a.i. used in health and you'll never have a radiologist against because a.i. will be more effective. the access to data and the use of data doesn't give the consumers things that not only life changing changing and lifeg but will save lies and that's unlike any other analogies and i wonder if you think i'm wrong. >> of course you're wrong. let's ask the audience. how many of you want an al -- algorithm as a doctor. >> one two. >> that's the wrong question, how many of you want your doctor to have algorithms and other cases just like your case, telling her or him the right answer for what you need for you? and i'll tell you -- >> we all want that. >> i don't -- you do i don't think you can ask anyone under 3035 who want say that's what they want. they want to live longer. >> you're changing the goalpost here. i mean, firstly, i celebrate netflix in the book. i think one of the tragedies of digital history is that we fell under the great sedes ducks and incredibly destruction of free information. and that decimated the news industry, decimated the music industry, for a while it decimate

a.i. you'll be at a disadvantage. there are sophisticated thinks likeke a.i.ine shopping and good delivery and getting something delivered in two hours like amazon is doing. can anybody beat amazon? >> i do think amazon is the most ferocious company in the u.s. at this point. and if you were -- it is probably the company you don't want to be competing against. i think there's always this verw big difference between companies like apple, microsoft, google, facebook, where the core businesses are quite high margin and the internal conversation is always, well, we can expand into this other business but we're only going to expand into other businesses that are equally high margin. and so you end up -- these companies end up being not that aggressive on the expansion side. they talk about it a lot. they think about it a lot. but most of the time the calculus always is does our margin go down if we do this and if we do it maybe we shouldn't. i'm not sure that's the right way think about it. maybe the t right way think abot it is you're earning 1.5% on your money in

a.i. lawyers using my human skills of legal persuasion. but what if robot lawyers were just the beginning. what if a.i. is take over the entire legal system? legal tech expert tim wong. >> increasingly, we're seeing the use of these automated systems, even in the application of law. judges, for example, are now using algrythsims to stacy whether people should be released pretrial. >> wait a minute, robots are already judging humans? >> oh, yes, in many states around the country. >> he's right. robot judges are already performing pretrial risk assessment, helping human judges to determine bail or if a person should be detained. >> and over 1 million criminal cases have been processed using these systems. >> what is the benefit of having a machine in the judiciary? >> some are saying they will be free of bias in the way that judges are not. >> i don't know about you, but i would rather be (bleep) over by a human than a machine any day of the week. unless it's one of those realistic swul bots. obviously, those things are like-- whoa. are you told when you feel them, it feels like the real-- >> i think that's a whole other issue. >> sorry. ( laughter ) ( applause ) but even sox bot addicts can see a.i >> a great study a few years back looked at the specific case of a pretrial risk-assessment system and they were able to find it was actually quite racist, that actually, black defendants who are not likely to commit crimes in the future had substantially higher risk ratings. >> you're saying these judging machines were racist? >> yeah, that's what it look likes in this case. >> oh, then that means the system works then. >> i don't know about that. no, i'm sorry. ( laughter ) but increasingly, we're seeing robots implemented all across legal practice. >> this is so ridiculous. where does it end? eventually you're going to see machines judging humans. >> a lot of systems we're seeing are not that advanced -- >> that's exactly what's to happen! robot lawyers? robot judges? what's life going to be like in this soulless new legal world? will no one stand to defend humans in law? your honor, members of the jury, this is about the essence of humanity itself. because unlike that thing, i wen

a.i., but we -- it is missing. neuro-coupling does not occur between an a.i. and a human being. regardless of that movie. her? she? the name of that movie? yeah. oh, she has a question. >> so i'm going to go buy three of your books and give it to three of my family members -- [laughter] and give them some thorough instructions from you. listen was one, but what would the other two be? >> the other one, obviously, put away your cell phone. put it away. and the last one would be if you're not able to have a conversation right then, walk away. if you can't focus and you can't listen, that's fair, that's fine. just excuse yourself. don't put the other person through the pain of talking to you when you can't listen. don't waste their time, just walk away. politely. other questions? don't you worry, i got plenty more. >> so there are a lot of people in -- i'm a millennial, and there are a lot of people in my generation and i'm sure the one below us now finish. >> the i-gen, they're calling it. >> right, right. that's scary. but they would argue that they are having meaningful conversations over text and over social

a.i. system that he said could essentially replace him by doing research and analysis. the a a.i.rticles, scans social media to understand what moves a stock and amazon is one of the stocks that ira analyzes. it thinks boston will score amazon's new headquarters. chicago in second place, atlanta in third place. but here's the new concern about atlanta. delta, major airline there, decided to stop the nra discounts and georgia's threat to eliminate the jet fuel sales tax exemption could make amazon walk away. let's go back to boston. amazon executives are visiting boston last week. the city totally pitching themselves as an old city with new ways of doing things, great transportation, tons of universities, and really a top city for fostering innovation and entrepreneurial growth. the robot tried to make science out of all of this but the more unscientific studies indicate that washington, d.c., which of course is home to jeff bezos who is amazon's ceo, the washington post thought d.c. is the favorite to win. we'll get a decision sometime this year. i don't know. what do you guys thi

a.i. pure technologies -- something unique about china is that moded and very highly aggregated data set. a.i. thrives on the ability to incorporate technology into that dataset. that's the only way you get that flywheel effect. have got to hit the critical number of data points for machine learning technologies to really take affect. and so, what we've done, rather .p.'s toking at u.s. ip bring in the smartest minds. so, you are seeing now is china leading in terms of the number of papers being produced on the a.ie the combination of data sets with brilliant minds working on problems together, i see it as less of a intellectual property or tech transfer issue, and the ability to monetize and grow learning using datasets, which frankly are not as highly aggregated in the united states. rishaad: so, has the horse bolted already? on copyrightown infringement, on tech at least, too little and far too late? very sector it is specific. certainly areas like hardware, chips, specific spaces around manufacturing, in those instances, there is still value to be captured by preventing i.p. infringement and reducing the technology transfer here locally, but when it comes to consumer internet, the times of models and the haves platforms that are being rolled out by folks like alibaba, tencent, ba idu, i think the horse is already gone. these businesses now have built such large and robust and motive platforms that are not just battle tested in china, but are beginning to go global and they are taking on new

a.i. >> we offer 24/7 concierge levl customer service. we use a.i. to help people who want to text us in the middle of the night, no matter when. it's a giant revolution. customer service used to be a misery for most people. now you can use a combination of humans and software to give people service that's as good as the best travel agent and they're using their phone 24/7 and texts. it's remarkable. it's going to sweep all of business. >> maria: that is so great, jay. >> big defer inshatte differente net promoter score in customer satisfaction. >> in business travel, the flight ills delayed, you're landing 1:00 in the morning, you need somebody to help you. business moved to a 24/7 cycle with mobile, people are looking for service no matter when and where and we're changing the game and you'll see it across travel. that's the leader. you're going to see it a across everything. today you call your cable company, you call your long distance provider, it's often an experience in misery. fairly soon that kind of system using humans and software is going to give you the kind of service that in the past only the most expensive got. >> maria: you figured out efficiency in business travel. >> your a.ihe traditional names you think of. >> it's true. so many of these google execs and microsoft and amazon people leave these giant companies, they go start a small company and their leading edge is thousand of spinoffs that are building applications and syndicating them across businesss in the united states and globally. >> maria: while on the subject of travel, do you want to comment on the dodo bird who put a dog in an overhead bin on an united airlines flight. we're all very upset. >> the fact is there's incredible things that happen good and incredible things that happen bad every day when they're 2 million flights a day. i would say don't rush to judgment. maybe somebody didn't say there was a dog in there. maybe somebody didn't hear it. >> maria: we didn't know there was a dog. >> when a disaster like that's t happens, your heart goes out to people. no organization wants to hurt people. >> dagen: if i killed somebody's dog i would say i didn't know it was in there either. >> nobody

a.i. this is not two chess moves from some new technology that may be created in 2021 and be applied by 2029. this is based on a.i. that exists today, what share of global economic jobs are disrupted within the next 12 years. that's not to say, mind you, 5% of jobs evaporate. this is 55% of tasks. when you bundle and unbundle current jobs, they speculate that 60% of today's jobs are more than 30% automatable. automatable. that tends to set off bells in people's minds that make the assumption nobody is going to be able to have any stability in a job. that's not true, but you probably won't have stability in a job if you don't plan to upscale as you go forward in your career. this is what atms did that surprised americans in the 1970s and '80s. my mom, farm kid, coming off the farm, didn't go to college, didn't know anybody who had really gone to college in her family and she became a bank teller soon after graduating from high school and this is in the late 1960s. the atm is created in 1967 in london and starts coming to the u.s. in 1969-70. the assumption at the time was that atms are going to upend all of these

a.i. they are obsessing over cutting -- breaking new areas in technology. you have the american president obsessing literally on 1800 technology. i'm not kidding. while they're looking at a.i., the american president is looking at mining. he wants to revive mining like he's in york, england, in 1863. it's true. and while they're talking about creating alternative energy sources that will dominate the next century, so they won't need oil or anything that we have, donald trump is talking about recreating a manufacturing base that owes more to 1957 in the great lakes region than what china is doing. it's really frightening. >> we're exactly right. we're a century different from china. they're looking ahead. we're looking back. the president asked what's a country that doesn't produce steel? that might be a country that's leader in a.i. or alternative energy or in robotics, that's training its workers not for the jobs that will never come back but it's training its workers so they're able to take the jobs that will come into existence. china is looking forward. we're looking backwards. guess who will dominate the 21st century if this continues? >> well, last week china announced a move to alter its constitution, paving the way for xi jinping to rule for life. >> boy, who ever saw that coming? >> during a closed door speech on saturday at mar-a-lago, president trump said, quote, he's now president for life. president for life. no, he's great. look, he was able to do that. i think it's great. maybe we'll have to give that a shot some day. >> i think he's great. i think it's great. >> i'm telling you -- >> you know, that was like -- last week was just stunning thing after stunning thing after stunning thing. that was one of the most stunning things that the chinese leader makes a clear play to become leader for life, t