a.j. liebling, there isn't anybody as good as a.j. liebling. >> exactly. >> i think that's a very good way to analyze a key part of this. that's a very weak -- a rather weak story in the paragraph. which is of course the achilles heel in the story. he gave his pledge he wouldn't publish it, then he broke the pledge. what you have to understand about liebling and kennedy, liebling himself had been a war reporter and had been extremely frustrated by what he had seen. and that article is an expression of the frustration that he was seeing, not just -- kennedy becomes an exemplar of the problem he had been seeing for so long during the war. so he's defending kennedy, as by the way i think he should have, because he thought kennedy was finally resisting what had happened, what the government had been systematically doing, and had become so willing to be compliant, as he put it, that they were constantly saluting, that they had gotten out of the habit for thinking for themselves. the book, the manuscript, that julia's brought forward, her fa