so some of a.k. khan's worst scenarios could come true, he talked about war between the americans and the soviets, he also wrote about catalytic war where a smaller nuclear state triggered off a war between major nuclear states. here i think pakistan's relationship with india and china is something that deserves further study. and, of course, the new issue did not write much about nuclear terrorism. there's a third paradox in that pakistan's relation with other major power is the deeply problematic. india/pakistan relations are better than u.s./pakistan relations. it professes to be a democracy, but it's three most important allies are china, north korea and saudi arabia. so pakistan's identity, i think marvin hinted at this, is problematic. but i'm can confident that there are enough good people in pakistan, i think, husain haqqani at the top of this list, really could manage the state given the opportunity to do so. so crises are going to continue. the fact that the military may take over in form,