heather, i'm going to have to put you on hold for a second and go to "washington post" reporter aaron blakelot more now we were wondering if this were a possibility given the lengthy delay. of course, they were supposed to start the trial on monday and that really didn't happen. we just learned that the judge set this and we don't know the terms. we're waiting to see what happens. >> we also have paul butler, our legal analyst, former legal prosecutor, paul, people are waiting for a final verdict on this case, but again, you can settle up until the verdict is read what do you think of this? >> so, there's a huge amount of m money at stake and fox doesn't have an obvious defense. the judge is already upset with fox for not turning over information it should have to the other side the judge also in an earlier ruling, said there are no factual issues about whether the statements that fox put out were true he said, as a matter of fact, those were lies. the only thing the jury has to decide is whether fox knew they were lies when they broadcast them lots of evidence that they did so it makes sen