one of them, aaron david miller, who was one of the people we dealt with and who's been involved with us for decades in his book describes the united states as acting as israel's lawyer. he was, in fact, quoting henry kissinger, who should know. the docmta cited in the book shows american diplomats time and again took positions as a result of careful prior coordination with the israeli side. how do you get to a solution in that situation is hard for me to understand. as i said, sometimes these positions were more proisraeli, quote-on-quote, and from camp david onwards, there's an unbiased intermediary, but generally operated in defense of israel's interests, and on top of the systematic detriplet of those of the palestinians, and in my view, systematic detriment to the possibility of a just and lasting peace between the two people. all of this was cloaked in high sounding, but thoroughly dishonest language. in conclusion, let me say that a number of broad patterns contributed to this position. palestinian weakness, i have not talked about. i wrote a book about hat, "thecs how badly th