SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
41
41
Feb 17, 2022
02/22
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 41
favorite 0
quote 0
aaye. [roll call vote] with the increase in the contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until october 9. >> z i understand it, the further extension would be subject to board action to wave any applicable -- >> yes, we would not be -- we would not extend beyond august 31 without the board's ordinance. at this time if the contract is decreasing, it is not a substitute change. >> and just to be very clear, the purpose of the resolution is to increase the amount. the amendment to the resolution maintains the same dollar amount as the original resolution. awe and un. thank you. >> so do we continue it or approve it? >> i think t
aaye. [roll call vote] with the increase in the contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until october...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
100
100
Feb 20, 2022
02/22
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 100
favorite 0
quote 0
aaye. [roll call vote] with the increase in the contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until october 9. >> z i understand it, the further extension would be subject to board action to wave any applicable -- >> yes, we would not be -- we would not extend beyond august 31 without the board's ordinance. at this time if the contract is decreasing, it is not a substitute change. >> and just to be very clear, the purpose of the resolution is to increase the amount. the amendment to the resolution maintains the same dollar amount as the original resolution. awe and un. thank you. >> so do we continue it or approve it? >> i think t
aaye. [roll call vote] with the increase in the contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until october...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
88
88
Feb 23, 2022
02/22
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 88
favorite 0
quote 0
aaye. contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until october 9. >> z i understand it, the further extension would be subject to board action to wave any applicable -- >> yes, we would not be -- we would not extend beyond august 31 without the board's ordinance. at this time if the contract is decreasing, it is not a substitute change. >> and just to be very clear, the purpose of the resolution is to increase the amount. the amendment to the resolution maintains the same dollar amount as the original resolution. awe and un. thank you. >> so do we continue it or approve it? >> i think the committee can move it up to the full bo
aaye. contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until october 9. >> z i understand it, the further...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
108
108
Feb 23, 2022
02/22
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 108
favorite 0
quote 0
aaye. [roll call vote] with the increase in the contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until october 9. >> z i understand it, the further extension would be subject to board action to wave any applicable -- >> yes, we would not be -- we would not extend beyond august 31 without the board's ordinance. at this time if the contract is decreasing, it is not a substitute change. >> and just to be very clear, the purpose of the resolution is to increase the amount. the amendment to the resolution maintains the same dollar amount as the original resolution. awe and un. thank you. >> so do we continue it or approve it? >> i think t
aaye. [roll call vote] with the increase in the contract amount, that will be deemed substantive and we should continue the matter. >> excuse me. there is no change in the amount from the original resolution. >> just a change in the amount of time. >> correct. deputy city attorney? >> fs either a change in the contract about o or the extension of the term and this would be a substantive amendment. so what we are doing here, the original resolution to delay until october...